1.
Dutfield G, Suthersanen U. Global Intellectual Property Law: Commentary and Materials. Edward Elgar; 2008.
2.
WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/
3.
World Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. Vol WIPO publication. 2nd ed. WIPO; 2004.
4.
Dinwoodie GB, Hennessey WO, Perlmutter S. International Intellectual Property Law and Policy. Vol Casebook series. LexisNexis; 2001.
5.
Goldstein P. International Intellectual Property Law: Cases and Materials. Vol University casebook series. Foundation Press; 2001.
6.
Gervais DJ. The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis. 3rd ed. Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters; 2008.
7.
Drahos P, Braithwaite J. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? Earthscan; 2002.
8.
Chang HJ. Intellectual Property Rights and Economics Development: Historical Lessons and Emerging Issues. Vol Intellectual property rights series. Third World Network; 2001.
9.
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
10.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
11.
Malbon J, Lawson C. Interpreting and Implementing the TRIPS Agreement: Is It Fair? Edward Elgar; 2008.
12.
Great Britain. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. Published 2002. http://www.iprcommission.org/graphic/documents/final_report.htm
13.
Great Britain. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. CIPR; 2002.
14.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230582392
15.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
16.
Helfer LR, Austin G. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface. Cambridge University Press; 2011. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302910&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
17.
Austin G, Helfer LR. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface. Cambridge University Press; 2011.
18.
Abbott, Frederick M. The International Intellectual Property System : Commentary and Materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.1. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&2%2C2%2C
19.
Abbott, Frederick M. The International Intellectual Property System : Commentary and Materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.2. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&1%2C1%2C
20.
Anderfelt U. International Patent-Legislation and Developing Countries. Martinus Nijhoff; 1971.
21.
Keith Aoki. Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic Resources. Carolina Academic Pr; 2008.
22.
Arup C. The New World Trade Organization Agreements: Globalizing Law through Services and Intellectual Property. Vol Cambridge studies in law and society. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
23.
Beier FK, Schricker G, Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht. From GATT to TRIPs: The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Vol IIC studies. studies in industrial and copyright law. VCH; 1996.
24.
Bertin GY, Wyatt S. Multinationals and Industrial Property: The Control of the World’s Technology. Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1988.
25.
Bellmann C, Dutfield G, Meléndez-Ortiz R, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Trading in Knowledge: Development Perspectives on TRIPS, Trade, and Sustainability. Earthscan Publications; 2003.
26.
Blakeney M. Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Concise Guide to the TRIPS Agreement. Vol Intellectual property in practice. Sweet & Maxwell; 1996.
27.
Boldrin M, Levine DK. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press; 2008. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511510854
28.
Boldrin M, Levine DK. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press; 2008.
29.
Braga CAP, Fink C, Sepulveda CP, World Bank. Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development. Vol World Bank discussion paper. The World Bank; 2000.
30.
Coombe RJ. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Vol Post-contemporary interventions. Duke University Press; 1998.
31.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Vol Classics series. Eighth edition. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
32.
Correa CM. Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options. Zed; 2000.
33.
Correa CM, Yusuf A. Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPs Agreement. Kluwer Law International; 1998.
34.
Correa CM. Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Vol 1. Vol Research handbooks on the WTO. Edward Elgar; 2010.
35.
Correa CM. Research Handbook on the Interpretation and Enforcement of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Vol 2. Vol Intellectual property in the WTO. Edward Elgar; 2010.
36.
Cottier T, Mavroidis PC. Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition, and Sustainable Development. Vol World Trade Forum. University of Michigan Press; 2003.
37.
D’Amato AA, Long DE. International Intellectual Property Law. Kluwer Law International; 1997.
38.
Drahos P. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Dartmouth; 1996.
39.
Drahos P. Intellectual Property. Vol The international library of essays in law and legal theory. Second series. Ashgate Dartmouth; 1999.
40.
Dreyfuss RC, Zimmerman DL, First H. Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford University Press; 2001.
41.
Dutfield G. Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: Past, Present and Future. 2nd ed. World Scientific; 2009.
42.
Fawcett JJ, Torremans P. Intellectual Property and Private International Law. Vol Oxford monographs in private international law. Clarendon; 1998.
43.
Finger JM, Schuler P. Poor People’s Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. Vol Trade and development series. Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2004.
44.
Fink C, Maskus KE, eds. Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. World Bank
45.
Heath C, Kamperman Sanders A. New Frontiers of Intellectual Property Law: IP and Cultural Heritage, Geographical Indicators, Enforcement, Overprotection. Hart Publishing; 2005. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000356.html
46.
Heath C, Kamperman Sanders A. New Frontiers of Intellectual Property Law: IP and Cultural Heritage, Geographical Indicators, Enforcement, Overprotection. Vol IIC studies. Hart Publishing; 2005.
47.
Landes WM, Posner RA. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2003.
48.
Maskus KE. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Institute for International Economics; 2000.
49.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Cambridge University Press; 2005. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42229&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
50.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
51.
Matthews D. Globalizing Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPs Agreement. Routledge; 2002.
52.
May C, Sell SK. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Vol Ipolitics. Lynne Rienners Publishers; 2006.
53.
Merges RP, Menell PS, Lemley MA. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age. 3rd. ed. Aspen Publishers; 2003.
54.
Oguamanam C. Intellectual Property in Global Governance: A Development Question. Routledge; 2012. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=346025&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
55.
Pugatch MP. The International Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights. Vol New horizons in intellectual property. Edward Elgar; 2004.
56.
Richards D. Intellectual Property Rights and Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of the TRIPS Agreement. M.E. Sharpe; 2004.
57.
Ryan MP. Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Brookings Institution Press; 1998.
58.
Sell SK. Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust. Vol SUNY series in global politics. State University of New York Press; 1998.
59.
Sherwood RM. Intellectual Property and Economic Development. Vol Westview special studies in science, technology, and public policy. Westview Press; 1990.
60.
Cornish WR, Vaver D, Bently L. Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. Cornish. Cambridge University Press; 2004.
61.
Wallerstein MB, Mogee ME, Schoen RA, National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Research Council (U.S.). Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. National Academy Press; 1993.
62.
Wadlow C. Enforcement of Intellectual Property in European and International Law: The New Private International Law of Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom and the European Community. Sweet & Maxwell; 1998.
63.
Watal J. Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. Oxford University Press; 2003.
64.
European intellectual property review. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I43D027A1A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
65.
European intellectual property review.
66.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. IIC: international review of industrial property and copyright law. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.IB2135AA0A70911DDA77AF52796FF0BEB&ndd=2&athens=true
67.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. International review of industrial property and copyright law.
68.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly. Published online 1997. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I4A579A40A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
69.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly.
70.
The Journal of world intellectual property. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1796
71.
The journal of world intellectual property.
72.
Managing intellectual property. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/30314
73.
Managing intellectual property.
74.
American Intellectual Property Law Association, William S. Hein & Company. AIPLA quarterly journal. Published online 1984. http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=AIPLAQJ&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none
76.
George Washington University, Franklin Pierce Law Center, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. Idea. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/idea&collection=journals
77.
LexisNexis (Firm). Intellectual property decisions. Published online 1978. http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB04STJrnlsSrch&csi=280314
78.
Centre for Legal and Business Information, LexisNexis (Firm). Intellectual property newsletter. http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB04STJrnlsSrch&csi=280316
79.
Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law.
80.
University of Georgia, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The journal of intellectual property law. http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=JIPL&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none
81.
Journal of international economic law. Published online 1998. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/jiel
82.
Journal of international economic law.
84.
University of Texas at Austin, State Bar of Texas, William S. Hein & Company. Texas intellectual property law journal. http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=TXIPLJ&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none
85.
United States Trademark Association, International Trademark Association, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Trade-mark reporter. http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB00STGenSrch&csi=10751
86.
Edwin C. Hettinger. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1989;18(1):31-52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265190
87.
Hettinger EC. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 1989;18(1):31-52. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265190
88.
Roberto Mazzoleni and Richard R. Nelson. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues. 1998;32(4):1031-1052. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4227385
89.
Mazzoleni R, Nelson RR. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues. 1998;32(4):1031-1052. doi:10.1080/00213624.1998.11506108
90.
Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. Vol Blackwell companions to philosophy. 2nd ed. Blackwell Pub; 2007.
91.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230582392
92.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
93.
Hughes, Justin. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal. 1988;77. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj77&div=19&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#309
94.
Hughes J. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal. 1988;77(2):287-366. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj77&collection=journals&id=309
95.
May C, Sell SK. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Vol Ipolitics. Lynne Rienners Publishers; 2006.
96.
Resnik DB. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 2003;46(4):319-335. doi:10.1023/A:1025631902384
97.
Resnik DB. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 2003;46(4):319-335. doi:10.1023/A:1025631902384
98.
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
99.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
100.
World Trade Organisation. WTO/DSP (2000) Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products – Report of the Panel. Published online 2000. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/7428d.pdf
101.
Howse R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 3(4):493-507. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x
102.
Howse R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2000;3(4):493-507. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x
103.
Nowak KJ. Staying within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2005;26. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mjil26&collection=journals&id=917
104.
Reichman, J.H. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement. International Lawyer (ABA). 1995;29. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr29&div=35&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
105.
Reichman JH. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement. International lawyer. 1995;29(2):345-388. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr29&collection=journals&id=355
106.
Weissman, Robert. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 1996;17. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel17&div=43&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
107.
Weissman R. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic. 1996;17(4):1069-1125. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel17&collection=journals&id=1081
108.
Novartis Ag vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 April, 2013. http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/
109.
Scherer FM, Watal J. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of International Economic Law. 2002;5(4):913-939. doi:10.1093/jiel/5.4.913
110.
Scherer FM, Watal J. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of international economic law. 2002;5(4):913-939. doi:10.1093/jiel/5.4.913
111.
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 2004;48(1):143-175. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693567?seq=1&Search=yes&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq1%3D%26amp%3Bq4%3D%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bq0%3DThe%2Bcontest%2Bbetween%2Bbusiness%2Band%2BNGO%2Bnetworks%2Bin%2Bintellectual%2Bproperty%2Brights%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq6%3D%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bq2%3D%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bacc%3Doff%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND&prevSearch=&resultsServiceName=null
112.
Sell SK, Prakash A. Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International studies quarterly. 2004;48(1):143-175. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3693567
113.
Charnovitz S. The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations. Journal of International Economic Law. 2002;5(1):207-211. doi:10.1093/jiel/5.1.207
114.
Charnovitz S. The legal status of the Doha declarations. Journal of international economic law. 2002;5(1):207-211. doi:10.1093/jiel/5.1.207
115.
Jakkrit Kuanpoth. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand - the ddI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2006:149-158. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d08000001490db35ec1276c2725&docguid=I123B4501E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&hitguid=IBD9A8B50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=19&resolvein=true
116.
Kuanpoth J. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand – the DDI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2006;(2):149-158. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I123B4501E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838
117.
Duncan Matthews. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2006:91-130. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IBD9A3D30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=I123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&suppsrguid=i0ad82d08000001490db9d4313f13979b&spos=7&epos=7&td=15&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D15%26spos%3D7%26rank%3D7%26epos%3D7%26hitguid%3DI123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%26docguid%3DI123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%26resolvein%3Dtrue%26srguid%3Di0ad82d08000001490db9d4313f13979b%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D49&crumb-action=append&context=50
118.
Matthews D. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2006;(2):91-130. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBD9A3D30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
119.
Morin JF, Gold ER. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European Journal of International Relations. 2010;16(4):563-587. doi:10.1177/1354066110366054
120.
Morin JF, Gold ER. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European journal of international relations. 2010;16(4):563-587. doi:10.1177/1354066110366054
121.
Pogge TW. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 2005;36(1-2):182-209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x
122.
Pogge TW. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 2005;36(1-2):182-209. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x
123.
Dwijen Rangnekar. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and Political Weekly. 2006;41(5):409-417. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4417764
124.
Rangnekar D. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and political weekly. 2006;41(5):409-417. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4417764
125.
Rangnekar D. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2007;10(5):365-387. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x
126.
Rangnekar D. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The journal of world intellectual property. 2007;10(5):365-387. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x
127.
Rangnekar D. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and political weekly. 1013;48(32):39-40. http://0-www.epw.in.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/glivec-precedent/supreme-court-judgment.html
128.
Rangnekar D. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and Political Weekly. 2013;48(32):39-40. http://0-www.epw.in.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/glivec-precedent/supreme-court-judgment.html
129.
Aoki K, Luvai K. Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex. Michigan State Law Review. 2007;2007:35-70. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mslr2007&collection=journals&id=41
130.
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
131.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
132.
van Wijk J. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 2004;16(1):121-141. http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0953732032000175544
133.
van Wijk J. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology analysis & strategic management. 2004;16(1):121-141. http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0953732032000175544
134.
Tansey G, Rajotte T. The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity and Food Security. Earthscan; 2008.
135.
Research Project: Impacts of the Intellectual Property Rights Rules on Sustainable Development. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/projects/ipdev/
136.
Final Report- Impact of the IPR rules on Sustainable Development. http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_final_report.pdf
137.
Lightbourne M, Dutfield G. Literature Review and Commentary on Legal Regimes and Models for Protecting Plant Varieties. http://www.ecologic.de/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_legal_literature_review.pdf
138.
Rangnekar D. Review of the Economic Literature on Plant Breeders’ Rights. http://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_economic_literature_review.pdf
139.
Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Bulgaria. (IPDEV Work Package 6). http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_bulgaria_case_study.pdf
140.
Lightbourne M, Muraguri L. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: China. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_china_case_study.pdf
141.
Lightbourne M. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Ethiopia. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_ethiopia_case_study.pdf
142.
Rangnekar D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: India. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_india_case_study.pdf
143.
Rangnekar D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Kenya. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_kenya_case_study.pdf
144.
Ivanov I, Yildiz B, Tsonkova O, Mateeva T. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Turkey. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_turkey_case_study.pdf
145.
Borowiak C. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics & Society. 2004;32(4):511-543. doi:10.1177/0032329204269979
146.
Borowiak C. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics and Society. 2004;32(4):511-543. doi:10.1177/0032329204269979
147.
Oguamanam C. Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends. Dalhousie Law Journal. 2006;29(2):413-454. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/dalholwj29&collection=journals&id=417
148.
Van Overwalle G. Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology. 1998;39(2):143-149. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/idea39&collection=journals&id=153
149.
Patel R. Food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies. 2009;36(3):663-706. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03066150903143079
150.
Patel R. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 2009;36(3):663-706. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03066150903143079
151.
Rangnekar D. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 2014;19(3):359-383. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.796445
152.
Rangnekar D. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 2014;19(3):359-383. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.796445
153.
de Schutter O. The right to food: Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation. Published online 2009. http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20091021_report-ga64_seed-policies-and-the-right-to-food_en.pdf
154.
Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark, supported by the French Republic and the United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, supported by the Hellenic Republic, Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02. Published online 25 October 2005. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0465:EN:PDF
155.
Rangnekar D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 2011;43(9):2043-2059. doi:10.1068/a43259
156.
Rangnekar D. Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning. 2011;43(9):2043-2059. doi:10.1068/a43259
157.
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
158.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
159.
Rangnekar D. Geographical indications: A review of proposals at the TRIPs Council – Extending article 23 to products other than wines and spirits. Published online 2003. http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/06/cs_rangnekar.pdf
160.
Rangnekar D. The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of evidence from Europe. Published online 2004. http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/07/a.pdf
161.
Yu PK. Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age. Vol Praeger perspectives. Praeger Publishers; 2007.
162.
Rangnekar D. Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni. Published online 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1564624
163.
Rangnekar D. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13(2). http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/jwip.2010.13.issue-2/issuetoc
164.
Rangnekar D. The journal of world intellectual property. 13(2).
165.
Correa CM. Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Vol Research handbooks on the WTO. Edward Elgar; 2010.
166.
Broude T. Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 2005;26. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&div=24&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
167.
Broude T. Taking ‘trade and culture’ seriously: Geographical indications and cultural protection in WTO law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international law. 2005;26(4):623-692. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&collection=journals&id=639
168.
Coombe RJ. Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 2005;1(1):35-52. doi:10.1191/1743872105lw010oa
169.
Evans GE, Blakeney M. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of international economic law. 2006;9(3):575-614. http://0-jiel.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/9/3/575.full?sid=d1a978ba-7e6e-4c58-ad88-658de03bd846
170.
Evans GE, Blakeney M. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of International Economic Law. 2006;9(3):575-614. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/jiel/jgl016
171.
Rangnekar D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 2011;43(9):2043-2059. doi:10.1068/a43259
172.
Rangnekar D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and planning. 2011;43(9):2043-2059. doi:10.1068/a43259
173.
Rangnekar D, Kumar S. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2010;13(2):202-230. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x
174.
Rangnekar D, Kumar S. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2010;13(2):202-230. doi:10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x
175.
Raustiala K, Munzer SR. The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications. European Journal of International Law. 2007;18(2):337-365. doi:10.1093/ejil/chm016
176.
Sunder M. Invention of Traditional Knowledge, The. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2007;70. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp70&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
177.
Sunder M. The invention of traditional knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2007;70(2):97-124. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp70&collection=journals&id=459
178.
Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Report of the Panel. Published online 15AD. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds160_e.htm
179.
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
180.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge University Press; 2005.
181.
Orit Fischman Afori. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. Published online 2013:392-417. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7&hitguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014912deb619bca2ca01&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D3%26spos%3D1%26rank%3D1%26suppsrguid%3Di0ad8289e0000014912deb619bca2ca01%26epos%3D1%26hitguid%3DIF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7%26docguid%3DI3548911003BC11E3BCC6ADB745F40E91%26resolvein%3Dtrue%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D10&crumb-action=append&context=17
182.
Afori OF. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 2013;44(4):392-417. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7
183.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2003;66. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
184.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 2003;66(1-2):33-74. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&collection=journals&id=39
185.
David J. Brennan. The three step test frenzy - why the TRIPs panel decision might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. Published online 2002. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014912ee97a388f087e4&docguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=20&spos=20&epos=20&td=26&crumb-action=append&context=30&resolvein=true
186.
Brennan DJ. The three steps test frenzy: why the TRIPs Panel might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2002;(2):212-225. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
187.
Chon M. Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education. UC Davis Law Review. 2007;40(3):803-854. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/davlr40&collection=journals&id=811
188.
Philippa Davies. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. Published online 2013:402-414. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I3A11BCA0D30E11E2B5068DA33E169237&crumb-action=append&context=66
189.
Davies P. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. 2013;35(7):402-414. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A11BCA0D30E11E2B5068DA33E169237
190.
Helfer LR. World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. Boston University Law Review. 2000;80(1):93-204. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/bulr80&collection=journals&id=107
191.
Lange D. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2003;66. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
192.
Lange D. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 2003;66(1-2):463-483. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&collection=journals&id=471
193.
Okediji R. TRIPs Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law Part II. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA. 2001;49(2):585-648. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jocoso49&collection=journals&id=626
194.
Richard Owens. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European Intellectual Property Review. 2003;25. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?src=toce&docguid=IB75D1A00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=7
195.
Owens R. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European intellectual property review. 2003;25:49-54. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IB75D1A00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
196.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion of the Court. Published online 2005. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/04-480P.ZO
197.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion and individual judges’ opinions. Published online 2005. https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/04-480.pdf
198.
Thomas Hays. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. Published online 2006. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014913177a772ecc76c2&docguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4&hitguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=15&crumb-action=append&context=22&resolvein=true
199.
Hays T. Secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review. 2007;29(1):15-21. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFD16C74083FB11DBB44ACB7302E2F64A
200.
Hays T. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Parts 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 2006;28(12):617-624. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4
201.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 2003;66(1-2):33-74. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=lcp
202.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 2003;66(1):33-74. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20059171
203.
Lee A. Bygrave. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review. Published online 2002:51-57. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001491322b0afa5b789a0&docguid=ICF96B900E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&hitguid=IB775AB10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=37&resolvein=true
204.
Bygrave LA. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review. 2002;24(2):51-57. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICF96B900E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838
205.
Helton M. Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems. 2006;40(1):1-36. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/collsp40&collection=journals&id=13
206.
Lee, Edward. The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005;62(2):147-162. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/198095899?accountid=14888
207.
Lee E. The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics. 2005;62(2):147-162. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/198095899?accountid=14888
208.
Lunney GSJr. Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, The. Virginia Law Review. 2001;87. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr87&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
209.
Lunney GS. The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Virginia law review. 2001;87(5):813-920. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr87&collection=journals&id=831
210.
Lerner J, Stern S, eds. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10. University of Chicago Press; 2010. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11764.pdf
211.
Maskus KE. Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Vanderbilt Law Review. 2000;53. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr53&div=69&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
212.
Maskus KE. Lessons from studying the international economics of intellectual property rights. Vanderbilt law review. 2000;53(6):2219-2239. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr53&collection=journals&id=2247
213.
Yu PK. A Tale of Two Development Agendas. Ohio Northern University Law Review. 2009;35(2):465-574. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/onulr35&collection=journals&id=469
214.
Alston P. Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly. 2005;27(3):755-829. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20069811
215.
de Beer J, ed. Implementing WIPO’s Development Agenda. Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 2009. http://web.idrc.ca/openebooks/454-3/#page_24
216.
Amy Kapczynski. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. The Yale Law Journal. 2008;117(5):804-885. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20455812?origin=crossref
217.
Kapczynski A. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. Yale law journal. 2008;117(5):804-885. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20455812
218.
Maskus KE, Penubarti M. How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics. 1995;39(3-4):227-248. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8
219.
Maskus KE, Penubarti M. How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property-Rights. Journal of international economics. 1995;39(3-4):227-248. doi:10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8
220.
May C. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 2008;22(1):97-113. doi:10.1080/13600820701740753
221.
May C. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 2008;22(1):161-170. doi:10.1080/13600820701740753
222.
Menescal AK. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2005;8(6):761-796. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x/pdf
223.
Menescal AK. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2005;8(6):761-796. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x/full
224.
Wade RH. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of International Political Economy. 2003;10(4):621-644. doi:10.1080/09692290310001601902
225.
Wade RH. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of international political economy. 2003;10(4):621-644. doi:10.1080/09692290310001601902
226.
Braithwaite J, Drahos P. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
227.
Helfer LR. Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law. 2004;29(1):1-84. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil29&collection=journals&id=11
228.
Abbott FM. Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law. ICTSD; 2006. http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/dialogue/2006-05-03/Frederick%20abbott%2012%200405b.pdf
229.
Chimni BS. Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective. International Studies. 1992;29(2):135-158. doi:10.1177/0020881792029002001
230.
Drahos P. Global Property Rights in Information: The story of TRIPS at the GATT. Prometheus. 1995;13(1):6-19. doi:10.1080/08109029508629187
231.
Fischer-Lescano A, Teubner G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 2004;25(4):999-1046. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mjil25&collection=journals&id=1013
232.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of International Economic Law. 2004;7(2):279-320. doi:10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
233.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of international economic law. 2004;7(2):279-320. doi:10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
234.
Sell S, May C. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 2001;8(3):467-500. doi:10.1080/09692290110055849
235.
Sell S, May C. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 2001;8(3):467-500. doi:10.1080/09692290110055849
