1.
Dutfield, G. & Suthersanen, U. Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. (Edward Elgar, 2008).
2.
WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/.
3.
World Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use. vol. WIPO publication (WIPO, 2004).
4.
Dinwoodie, G. B., Hennessey, W. O. & Perlmutter, S. International intellectual property law and policy. vol. Casebook series (LexisNexis, 2001).
5.
Goldstein, P. International intellectual property law: cases and materials. vol. University casebook series (Foundation Press, 2001).
6.
Gervais, D. J. The TRIPS agreement: drafting history and analysis. (Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, 2008).
7.
Drahos, P. & Braithwaite, J. Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy? (Earthscan, 2002).
8.
Chang, H.-J. Intellectual property rights and economics development: historical  lessons and emerging issues. vol. Intellectual property rights series (Third World Network, 2001).
9.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
10.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
11.
Malbon, J. & Lawson, C. Interpreting and implementing the TRIPS agreement: is it fair? (Edward Elgar, 2008).
12.
Great Britain. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. http://www.iprcommission.org/graphic/documents/final_report.htm (2002).
13.
Great Britain. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. (CIPR, 2002).
14.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A. & Strowel, A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
15.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A. & Strowel, A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
16.
Helfer, L. R. & Austin, G. Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
17.
Austin, G. & Helfer, L. R. Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. (Cambridge University Press, 2011).
18.
Abbott, Frederick M. The international intellectual property system : commentary and  materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.1.
19.
Abbott, Frederick M. The international intellectual property system : commentary and  materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.2.
20.
Anderfelt, U. International patent-legislation and developing countries. (Martinus Nijhoff, 1971).
21.
Keith Aoki. Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic Resources. (Carolina Academic Pr, 2008).
22.
Arup, C. The new World Trade Organization agreements: globalizing law through services and intellectual property. vol. Cambridge studies in law and society (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
23.
Beier, F.-K., Schricker, G., & Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht. From GATT to TRIPs: the agreement on trade-related aspects of  intellectual property rights. vol. IIC studies. studies in industrial and copyright law (VCH, 1996).
24.
Bertin, G. Y. & Wyatt, S. Multinationals and industrial property: the control of the world’s  technology. (Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1988).
25.
Bellmann, C., Dutfield, G., Meléndez-Ortiz, R., & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Trading in knowledge: development perspectives on TRIPS, trade, and sustainability. (Earthscan Publications, 2003).
26.
Blakeney, M. Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: a concise  guide to the TRIPS agreement. vol. Intellectual property in practice (Sweet & Maxwell, 1996).
27.
Boldrin, M. & Levine, D. K. Against Intellectual Monopoly. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
28.
Boldrin, M. & Levine, D. K. Against intellectual monopoly. (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
29.
Braga, C. A. P., Fink, C., Sepulveda, C. P., & World Bank. Intellectual property rights and economic development. vol. World Bank discussion paper (The World Bank, 2000).
30.
Coombe, R. J. The cultural life of intellectual properties: authorship,  appropriation, and the law. vol. Post-contemporary interventions (Duke University Press, 1998).
31.
Cornish, W. R., Llewelyn, D. & Aplin, T. F. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. vol. Classics series (Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, 2013).
32.
Correa, C. M. Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: the TRIPS agreement and policy options. (Zed, 2000).
33.
Correa, C. M. & Yusuf, A. Intellectual property and international trade: the TRIPs agreement. (Kluwer Law International, 1998).
34.
Correa, C. M. Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 1. vol. Research handbooks on the WTO. (Edward Elgar, 2010).
35.
Correa, C. M. Research handbook on the interpretation and enforcement of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 2. vol. Intellectual property in the WTO (Edward Elgar, 2010).
36.
Cottier, T. & Mavroidis, P. C. Intellectual property: trade, competition, and sustainable development. vol. World Trade Forum (University of Michigan Press, 2003).
37.
D’Amato, A. A. & Long, D. E. International intellectual property law. (Kluwer Law International, 1997).
38.
Drahos, P. A philosophy of intellectual property. (Dartmouth, 1996).
39.
Drahos, P. Intellectual property. vol. The international library of essays in law and legal theory. Second series (Ashgate Dartmouth, 1999).
40.
Dreyfuss, R. C., Zimmerman, D. L. & First, H. Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge society. (Oxford University Press, 2001).
41.
Dutfield, G. Intellectual property rights and the life science industries: past, present and future. (World Scientific, 2009).
42.
Fawcett, J. J. & Torremans, P. Intellectual property and private international law. vol. Oxford monographs in private international law (Clarendon, 1998).
43.
Finger, J. M. & Schuler, P. Poor people’s knowledge: promoting intellectual property in developing countries. vol. Trade and development series (Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press, 2004).
44.
Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research. (World Bank).
45.
Heath, C. & Kamperman Sanders, A. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. (Hart Publishing, 2005).
46.
Heath, C. & Kamperman Sanders, A. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. vol. IIC studies (Hart Publishing, 2005).
47.
Landes, W. M. & Posner, R. A. The economic structure of intellectual property law. (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2003).
48.
Maskus, K. E. Intellectual property rights in the global economy. (Institute for International Economics, 2000).
49.
Maskus, K. E. & Reichman, J. H. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
50.
Maskus, K. E. & Reichman, J. H. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
51.
Matthews, D. Globalizing intellectual property rights: the TRIPs agreement. (Routledge, 2002).
52.
May, C. & Sell, S. K. Intellectual property rights: a critical history. vol. Ipolitics (Lynne Rienners Publishers, 2006).
53.
Merges, R. P., Menell, P. S. & Lemley, M. A. Intellectual property in the new technological age. (Aspen Publishers, 2003).
54.
Oguamanam, C. Intellectual property in global governance: a development question. (Routledge, 2012).
55.
Pugatch, M. P. The international political economy of intellectual property rights. vol. New horizons in intellectual property (Edward Elgar, 2004).
56.
Richards, D. Intellectual property rights and global capitalism: the political economy of the TRIPS Agreement. (M.E. Sharpe, 2004).
57.
Ryan, M. P. Knowledge diplomacy: global competition and the politics of  intellectual property. (Brookings Institution Press, 1998).
58.
Sell, S. K. Power and ideas: North-South politics of intellectual property and  antitrust. vol. SUNY series in global politics (State University of New York Press, 1998).
59.
Sherwood, R. M. Intellectual property and economic development. vol. Westview special studies in science, technology, and public policy (Westview Press, 1990).
60.
Cornish, W. R., Vaver, D. & Bently, L. Intellectual property in the new millennium: essays in honour of William R. Cornish. (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
61.
Wallerstein, M. B., Mogee, M. E., Schoen, R. A., National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), & National Research Council (U.S.). Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and  technology. (National Academy Press, 1993).
62.
Wadlow, C. Enforcement of intellectual property in European and international  law: the new private international law of intellectual property in the United Kingdom and the European Community. (Sweet & Maxwell, 1998).
63.
Watal, J. Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries. (Oxford University Press, 2003).
64.
European intellectual property review.
65.
European intellectual property review.
66.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. IIC: international review of industrial property and copyright law.
67.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. International review of industrial property and copyright law.
68.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly. (1997).
69.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly.
70.
The Journal of world intellectual property.
71.
The journal of world intellectual property.
72.
Managing intellectual property.
73.
Managing intellectual property.
74.
American Intellectual Property Law Association & William S. Hein & Company. AIPLA quarterly journal. (1984).
75.
Copyright World.
76.
George Washington University, Franklin Pierce Law Center, LexisNexis (Firm), & William S. Hein & Company. Idea.
77.
LexisNexis (Firm). Intellectual property decisions. (1978).
78.
Centre for Legal and Business Information & LexisNexis (Firm). Intellectual property newsletter.
79.
Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law.
80.
University of Georgia, LexisNexis (Firm), & William S. Hein & Company. The journal of intellectual property law.
81.
Journal of international economic law. (1998).
82.
Journal of international economic law.
83.
Patent world.
84.
University of Texas at Austin, State Bar of Texas, & William S. Hein & Company. Texas intellectual property law journal.
85.
United States Trademark Association, International Trademark Association, LexisNexis (Firm), & William S. Hein & Company. The Trade-mark reporter.
86.
Edwin C. Hettinger. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy & Public Affairs 18, 31–52 (1989).
87.
Hettinger, E. C. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, 31–52 (1989).
88.
Roberto Mazzoleni and Richard R. Nelson. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues 32, 1031–1052 (1998).
89.
Mazzoleni, R. & Nelson, R. R. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues 32, 1031–1052 (1998).
90.
Goodin, R. E., Pettit, P. & Pogge, T. A companion to contemporary political philosophy. vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy (Blackwell Pub, 2007).
91.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A. & Strowel, A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
92.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A. & Strowel, A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. (Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).
93.
Hughes, Justin. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal 77, (1988).
94.
Hughes, J. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal 77, 287–366 (1988).
95.
May, C. & Sell, S. K. Intellectual property rights: a critical history. vol. Ipolitics (Lynne Rienners Publishers, 2006).
96.
Resnik, D. B. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 319–335 (2003).
97.
Resnik, D. B. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics 46, 319–335 (2003).
98.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
99.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
100.
World Trade Organisation. WTO/DSP (2000) Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products – Report of the Panel. (2000).
101.
Howse, R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 3, 493–507.
102.
Howse, R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 3, 493–507 (2000).
103.
Nowak, K. J. Staying within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27. Michigan Journal of International Law 26, (2005).
104.
Reichman, J.H. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement. International Lawyer (ABA) 29, (1995).
105.
Reichman, J. H. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement. International lawyer 29, 345–388 (1995).
106.
Weissman, Robert. Long, Strange Trips:  The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17, (1996).
107.
Weissman, R. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic 17, 1069–1125 (1996).
108.
Novartis Ag vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 April, 2013. http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/.
109.
Scherer, F. M. & Watal, J. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of International Economic Law 5, 913–939 (2002).
110.
Scherer, F. M. & Watal, J. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of international economic law 5, 913–939 (2002).
111.
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly 48, 143–175 (2004).
112.
Sell, S. K. & Prakash, A. Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International studies quarterly 48, 143–175 (2004).
113.
Charnovitz, S. The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations. Journal of International Economic Law 5, 207–211 (2002).
114.
Charnovitz, S. The legal status of the Doha declarations. Journal of international economic law 5, 207–211 (2002).
115.
Jakkrit Kuanpoth. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand - the ddI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly 149–158 (2006).
116.
Kuanpoth, J. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand – the DDI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly 149–158 (2006).
117.
Duncan Matthews. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly 91–130 (2006).
118.
Matthews, D. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly 91–130 (2006).
119.
Morin, J.-F. & Gold, E. R. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European Journal of International Relations 16, 563–587 (2010).
120.
Morin, J.-F. & Gold, E. R. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European journal of international relations 16, 563–587 (2010).
121.
Pogge, T. W. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy 36, 182–209 (2005).
122.
Pogge, T. W. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy 36, 182–209 (2005).
123.
Dwijen Rangnekar. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and Political Weekly 41, 409–417 (2006).
124.
Rangnekar, D. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and political weekly 41, 409–417 (2006).
125.
Rangnekar, D. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10, 365–387 (2007).
126.
Rangnekar, D. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The journal of world intellectual property 10, 365–387 (2007).
127.
Rangnekar, D. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and political weekly 48, 39–40 (1013).
128.
Rangnekar, D. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and Political Weekly 48, 39–40 (2013).
129.
Aoki, K. & Luvai, K. Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex. Michigan State Law Review 2007, 35–70 (2007).
130.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
131.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
132.
van Wijk, J. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16, 121–141 (2004).
133.
van Wijk, J. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology analysis & strategic management 16, 121–141 (2004).
134.
Tansey, G. & Rajotte, T. The future control of food: a guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, biodiversity and food security. (Earthscan, 2008).
135.
Research Project: Impacts of the Intellectual Property Rights Rules on Sustainable Development. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/projects/ipdev/.
136.
Final Report- Impact of the IPR rules on Sustainable Development.
137.
Lightbourne, M. & Dutfield, G. Literature Review and Commentary on Legal Regimes and Models for Protecting Plant Varieties.
138.
Rangnekar, D. Review of the Economic Literature on Plant Breeders’ Rights.
139.
Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Bulgaria.
140.
Lightbourne, M. & Muraguri, L. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: China.
141.
Lightbourne, M. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Ethiopia.
142.
Rangnekar, D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: India.
143.
Rangnekar, D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Kenya.
144.
Ivanov, I., Yildiz, B., Tsonkova, O. & Mateeva, T. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Turkey.
145.
Borowiak, C. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics & Society 32, 511–543 (2004).
146.
Borowiak, C. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics and Society 32, 511–543 (2004).
147.
Oguamanam, C. Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends. Dalhousie Law Journal 29, 413–454 (2006).
148.
Van Overwalle, G. Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 39, 143–149 (1998).
149.
Patel, R. Food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies 36, 663–706 (2009).
150.
Patel, R. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36, 663–706 (2009).
151.
Rangnekar, D. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy 19, 359–383 (2014).
152.
Rangnekar, D. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy 19, 359–383 (2014).
153.
de Schutter, O. The right to food: Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation. (2009).
154.
Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark, supported by the French Republic and the United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, supported by the Hellenic Republic, Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02. (2005).
155.
Rangnekar, D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A 43, 2043–2059 (2011).
156.
Rangnekar, D. Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning 43, 2043–2059 (2011).
157.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
158.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
159.
Rangnekar, D. Geographical indications: A review of proposals at the TRIPs Council – Extending article 23 to products other than wines and spirits. (2003).
160.
Rangnekar, D. The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of evidence from Europe. (2004).
161.
Yu, P. K. Intellectual property and information wealth: issues and practices in the digital age. vol. Praeger perspectives (Praeger Publishers, 2007).
162.
Rangnekar, D. Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni. (2009).
163.
Rangnekar, D. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13,.
164.
Rangnekar, D. The journal of world intellectual property. 13,.
165.
Correa, C. M. Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. vol. Research handbooks on the WTO. (Edward Elgar, 2010).
166.
Broude, T. Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 26, (2005).
167.
Broude, T. Taking ‘trade and culture’ seriously: Geographical indications and cultural protection in WTO law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international law 26, 623–692 (2005).
168.
Coombe, R. J. Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference. Law, Culture and the Humanities 1, 35–52 (2005).
169.
Evans, G. E. & Blakeney, M. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of international economic law 9, 575–614 (2006).
170.
Evans, G. E. & Blakeney, M. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of International Economic Law 9, 575–614 (2006).
171.
Rangnekar, D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A 43, 2043–2059 (2011).
172.
Rangnekar, D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and planning 43, 2043–2059 (2011).
173.
Rangnekar, D. & Kumar, S. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13, 202–230 (2010).
174.
Rangnekar, D. & Kumar, S. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13, 202–230 (2010).
175.
Raustiala, K. & Munzer, S. R. The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications. European Journal of International Law 18, 337–365 (2007).
176.
Sunder, M. Invention of Traditional Knowledge, The. Law and Contemporary Problems 70, (2007).
177.
Sunder, M. The invention of traditional knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems 70, 97–124 (2007).
178.
Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Report of the Panel. (15AD).
179.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
180.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development & International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
181.
Orit Fischman Afori. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 392–417 (2013).
182.
Afori, O. F. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 44, 392–417 (2013).
183.
Boyle, J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66, (2003).
184.
Boyle, J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems 66, 33–74 (2003).
185.
David J. Brennan. The three step test frenzy - why the TRIPs panel decision might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly (2002).
186.
Brennan, D. J. The three steps test frenzy: why the TRIPs Panel might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly 212–225 (2002).
187.
Chon, M. Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education. U.C. Davis Law Review 40, 803–854 (2007).
188.
Philippa Davies. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review 402–414 (2013).
189.
Davies, P. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review 35, 402–414 (2013).
190.
Helfer, L. R. World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. Boston University Law Review 80, 93–204 (2000).
191.
Lange, D. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66, (2003).
192.
Lange, D. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems 66, 463–483 (2003).
193.
Okediji, R. TRIPs Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law Part II. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49, 585–648 (2001).
194.
Richard Owens. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European Intellectual Property Review 25, (2003).
195.
Owens, R. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European intellectual property review 25, 49–54 (2003).
196.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion of the Court. (2005).
197.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion and individual judges’ opinions. (2005).
198.
Thomas Hays. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review (2006).
199.
Hays, T. Secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review 29, 15–21 (2007).
200.
Hays, T. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Parts 1. European Intellectual Property Review 28, 617–624 (2006).
201.
Boyle, J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems vol. 66 33–74 (2003).
202.
Boyle, J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems 66, 33–74 (2003).
203.
Lee A. Bygrave. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review 51–57 (2002).
204.
Bygrave, L. A. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review 24, 51–57 (2002).
205.
Helton, M. Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 40, 1–36 (2006).
206.
Lee, Edward. The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics 62, 147–162 (2005).
207.
Lee, E. The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics 62, 147–162 (2005).
208.
Lunney, G. S. Jr. Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, The. Virginia Law Review 87, (2001).
209.
Lunney, G. S. The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Virginia law review 87, 813–920 (2001).
210.
Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10. (University of Chicago Press, 2010).
211.
Maskus, K. E. Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Vanderbilt Law Review 53, (2000).
212.
Maskus, K. E. Lessons from studying the international economics of intellectual property rights. Vanderbilt law review 53, 2219–2239 (2000).
213.
Yu, P. K. A Tale of Two Development Agendas. Ohio Northern University Law Review 35, 465–574 (2009).
214.
Alston, P. Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly 27, 755–829 (2005).
215.
Implementing WIPO’s Development Agenda. (Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2009).
216.
Amy Kapczynski. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. The Yale Law Journal 117, 804–885 (2008).
217.
Kapczynski, A. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. Yale law journal 117, 804–885 (2008).
218.
Maskus, K. E. & Penubarti, M. How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics 39, 227–248 (1995).
219.
Maskus, K. E. & Penubarti, M. How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property-Rights. Journal of international economics 39, 227–248 (1995).
220.
May, C. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society 22, 97–113 (2008).
221.
May, C. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society 22, 161–170 (2008).
222.
Menescal, A. K. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 8, 761–796 (2005).
223.
Menescal, A. K. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 8, 761–796 (2005).
224.
Wade, R. H. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of International Political Economy 10, 621–644 (2003).
225.
Wade, R. H. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of international political economy 10, 621–644 (2003).
226.
Braithwaite, J. & Drahos, P. Global business regulation. (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
227.
Helfer, L. R. Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law 29, 1–84 (2004).
228.
Abbott, F. M. Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law. (ICTSD, 2006).
229.
Chimni, B. S. Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective. International Studies 29, 135–158 (1992).
230.
Drahos, P. Global Property Rights in Information: The story of TRIPS at the GATT. Prometheus 13, 6–19 (1995).
231.
Fischer-Lescano, A. & Teubner, G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law 25, 999–1046 (2004).
232.
Maskus, K. E. & Reichman, J. H. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of International Economic Law 7, 279–320 (2004).
233.
Maskus, K. E. & Reichman, J. H. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of international economic law 7, 279–320 (2004).
234.
Sell, S. & May, C. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy 8, 467–500 (2001).
235.
Sell, S. & May, C. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy 8, 467–500 (2001).