1.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
2.
WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use, http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/.
3.
World Intellectual Property Organization: WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use. WIPO, Geneva (2004).
4.
Dinwoodie, G.B., Hennessey, W.O., Perlmutter, S.: International intellectual property law and policy. LexisNexis, Newark, N.J. (2001).
5.
Goldstein, P.: International intellectual property law: cases and materials. Foundation Press, New York (2001).
6.
Gervais, D.J.: The TRIPS agreement: drafting history and analysis. Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters, London (2008).
7.
Drahos, P., Braithwaite, J.: Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy? Earthscan, London (2002).
8.
Chang, H.-J.: Intellectual property rights and economics development: historical lessons and emerging issues. Third World Network, Penang, Malaysia (2001).
9.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
10.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
11.
Malbon, J., Lawson, C.: Interpreting and implementing the TRIPS agreement: is it fair? Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2008).
12.
Great Britain: Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy, http://www.iprcommission.org/graphic/documents/final_report.htm.
13.
Great Britain: Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. CIPR, London (2002).
14.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A., Strowel, A.: Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
15.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A., Strowel, A.: Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke [England] (2008).
16.
Helfer, L.R., Austin, G.: Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
17.
Austin, G., Helfer, L.R.: Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2011).
18.
Abbott, Frederick M.: The international intellectual property system : commentary and materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.1.
19.
Abbott, Frederick M.: The international intellectual property system : commentary and materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.2.
20.
Anderfelt, U.: International patent-legislation and developing countries. Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague (1971).
21.
Keith Aoki: Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic Resources. Carolina Academic Pr (2008).
22.
Arup, C.: The new World Trade Organization agreements: globalizing law through services and intellectual property. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
23.
Beier, F.-K., Schricker, G., Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht: From GATT to TRIPs: the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. VCH, Weinheim (1996).
24.
Bertin, G.Y., Wyatt, S.: Multinationals and industrial property: the control of the world’s technology. Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead (1988).
25.
Bellmann, C., Dutfield, G., Meléndez-Ortiz, R., International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Trading in knowledge: development perspectives on TRIPS, trade, and sustainability. Earthscan Publications, London (2003).
26.
Blakeney, M.: Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: a concise guide to the TRIPS agreement. Sweet & Maxwell, London (1996).
27.
Boldrin, M., Levine, D.K.: Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008).
28.
Boldrin, M., Levine, D.K.: Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008).
29.
Braga, C.A.P., Fink, C., Sepulveda, C.P., World Bank: Intellectual property rights and economic development. The World Bank, Washington, D.C. (2000).
30.
Coombe, R.J.: The cultural life of intellectual properties: authorship, appropriation, and the law. Duke University Press, Durham, N.C. (1998).
31.
Cornish, W.R., Llewelyn, D., Aplin, T.F.: Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters, London (2013).
32.
Correa, C.M.: Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: the TRIPS agreement and policy options. Zed, London (2000).
33.
Correa, C.M., Yusuf, A.: Intellectual property and international trade: the TRIPs agreement. Kluwer Law International, London (1998).
34.
Correa, C.M.: Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 1. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2010).
35.
Correa, C.M.: Research handbook on the interpretation and enforcement of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 2. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2010).
36.
Cottier, T., Mavroidis, P.C.: Intellectual property: trade, competition, and sustainable development. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2003).
37.
D’Amato, A.A., Long, D.E.: International intellectual property law. Kluwer Law International, London (1997).
38.
Drahos, P.: A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth, Aldershot (1996).
39.
Drahos, P.: Intellectual property. Ashgate Dartmouth, Aldershot (1999).
40.
Dreyfuss, R.C., Zimmerman, D.L., First, H.: Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge society. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001).
41.
Dutfield, G.: Intellectual property rights and the life science industries: past, present and future. World Scientific, Singapore (2009).
42.
Fawcett, J.J., Torremans, P.: Intellectual property and private international law. Clarendon, Oxford (1998).
43.
Finger, J.M., Schuler, P.: Poor people’s knowledge: promoting intellectual property in developing countries. Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press, [Washington, D.C.] (2004).
44.
Fink, C., Maskus, K.E. eds: Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research. World Bank, Washington, DC.
45.
Heath, C., Kamperman Sanders, A.: New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2005).
46.
Heath, C., Kamperman Sanders, A.: New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. Hart Publishing, Oxford (2005).
47.
Landes, W.M., Posner, R.A.: The economic structure of intellectual property law. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass (2003).
48.
Maskus, K.E.: Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C. (2000).
49.
Maskus, K.E., Reichman, J.H.: International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2005).
50.
Maskus, K.E., Reichman, J.H.: International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2005).
51.
Matthews, D.: Globalizing intellectual property rights: the TRIPs agreement. Routledge, London (2002).
52.
May, C., Sell, S.K.: Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Lynne Rienners Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2006).
53.
Merges, R.P., Menell, P.S., Lemley, M.A.: Intellectual property in the new technological age. Aspen Publishers, New York (2003).
54.
Oguamanam, C.: Intellectual property in global governance: a development question. Routledge, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon (2012).
55.
Pugatch, M.P.: The international political economy of intellectual property rights. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2004).
56.
Richards, D.: Intellectual property rights and global capitalism: the political economy of the TRIPS Agreement. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk, N.Y. (2004).
57.
Ryan, M.P.: Knowledge diplomacy: global competition and the politics of intellectual property. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (1998).
58.
Sell, S.K.: Power and ideas: North-South politics of intellectual property and antitrust. State University of New York Press, Albany, New York (1998).
59.
Sherwood, R.M.: Intellectual property and economic development. Westview Press, Boulder (1990).
60.
Cornish, W.R., Vaver, D., Bently, L.: Intellectual property in the new millennium: essays in honour of William R. Cornish. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2004).
61.
Wallerstein, M.B., Mogee, M.E., Schoen, R.A., National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Research Council (U.S.): Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C. (1993).
62.
Wadlow, C.: Enforcement of intellectual property in European and international law: the new private international law of intellectual property in the United Kingdom and the European Community. Sweet & Maxwell, London (1998).
63.
Watal, J.: Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries. Oxford University Press, New Delhi (2003).
64.
European intellectual property review.
65.
European intellectual property review.
66.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht: IIC: international review of industrial property and copyright law.
67.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht: International review of industrial property and copyright law.
68.
Intellectual Property Institute: Intellectual property quarterly. (1997).
69.
Intellectual Property Institute: Intellectual property quarterly.
70.
The Journal of world intellectual property.
71.
The journal of world intellectual property.
72.
Managing intellectual property.
73.
Managing intellectual property.
74.
American Intellectual Property Law Association, William S. Hein & Company: AIPLA quarterly journal. (1984).
76.
George Washington University, Franklin Pierce Law Center, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: Idea.
77.
LexisNexis (Firm): Intellectual property decisions. (1978).
78.
Centre for Legal and Business Information, LexisNexis (Firm): Intellectual property newsletter.
79.
Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law.
80.
University of Georgia, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: The journal of intellectual property law.
81.
Journal of international economic law. (1998).
82.
Journal of international economic law.
84.
University of Texas at Austin, State Bar of Texas, William S. Hein & Company: Texas intellectual property law journal.
85.
United States Trademark Association, International Trademark Association, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company: The Trade-mark reporter.
86.
Edwin C. Hettinger: Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 18, 31–52 (1989).
87.
Hettinger, E.C.: Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 18, 31–52 (1989).
88.
Roberto Mazzoleni and Richard R. Nelson: Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues. 32, 1031–1052 (1998).
89.
Mazzoleni, R., Nelson, R.R.: Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues. 32, 1031–1052 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506108.
90.
Goodin, R.E., Pettit, P., Pogge, T.: A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Blackwell Pub, Malden, Mass (2007).
91.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A., Strowel, A.: Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke (2008).
92.
Gosseries, A., Marciano, A., Strowel, A.: Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke [England] (2008).
93.
Hughes, Justin: The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal. 77, (1988).
94.
Hughes, J.: The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal. 77, 287–366 (1988).
95.
May, C., Sell, S.K.: Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Lynne Rienners Publishers, Boulder, Colo (2006).
96.
Resnik, D.B.: A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 46, 319–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384.
97.
Resnik, D.B.: A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 46, 319–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384.
98.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
99.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
100.
World Trade Organisation: WTO/DSP (2000) Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products – Report of the Panel, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/7428d.pdf, (2000).
101.
Howse, R.: The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 3, 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x.
102.
Howse, R.: The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 3, 493–507 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x.
103.
Nowak, K.J.: Staying within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27. Michigan Journal of International Law. 26, (2005).
104.
Reichman, J.H.: Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement. International Lawyer (ABA). 29, (1995).
105.
Reichman, J.H.: Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement. International lawyer. 29, 345–388 (1995).
106.
Weissman, Robert: Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 17, (1996).
107.
Weissman, R.: Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic. 17, 1069–1125 (1996).
108.
Novartis Ag vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 April, 2013, http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/.
109.
Scherer, F.M., Watal, J.: Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of International Economic Law. 5, 913–939 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
110.
Scherer, F.M., Watal, J.: Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of international economic law. 5, 913–939 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
111.
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash: Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 143–175 (2004).
112.
Sell, S.K., Prakash, A.: Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International studies quarterly. 48, 143–175 (2004).
113.
Charnovitz, S.: The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations. Journal of International Economic Law. 5, 207–211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207.
114.
Charnovitz, S.: The legal status of the Doha declarations. Journal of international economic law. 5, 207–211 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207.
115.
Jakkrit Kuanpoth.: Patents and access to medicines in Thailand - the ddI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 149–158 (2006).
116.
Kuanpoth, J.: Patents and access to medicines in Thailand – the DDI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 149–158 (2006).
117.
Duncan Matthews.: From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 91–130 (2006).
118.
Matthews, D.: From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 91–130 (2006).
119.
Morin, J.-F., Gold, E.R.: Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European Journal of International Relations. 16, 563–587 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366054.
120.
Morin, J.-F., Gold, E.R.: Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European journal of international relations. 16, 563–587 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366054.
121.
Pogge, T.W.: Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 36, 182–209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
122.
Pogge, T.W.: Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 36, 182–209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
123.
Dwijen Rangnekar: No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and Political Weekly. 41, 409–417 (2006).
124.
Rangnekar, D.: No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and political weekly. 41, 409–417 (2006).
125.
Rangnekar, D.: Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 10, 365–387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
126.
Rangnekar, D.: Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The journal of world intellectual property. 10, 365–387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
127.
Rangnekar, D.: The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and political weekly. 48, 39–40 (1013).
128.
Rangnekar, D.: The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and Political Weekly. 48, 39–40 (2013).
129.
Aoki, K., Luvai, K.: Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex. Michigan State Law Review. 2007, 35–70 (2007).
130.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
131.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
132.
van Wijk, J.: Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 16, 121–141 (2004).
133.
van Wijk, J.: Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology analysis & strategic management. 16, 121–141 (2004).
134.
Tansey, G., Rajotte, T.: The future control of food: a guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, biodiversity and food security. Earthscan, London (2008).
135.
Research Project: Impacts of the Intellectual Property Rights Rules on Sustainable Development, http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/projects/ipdev/.
136.
Final Report- Impact of the IPR rules on Sustainable Development, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_final_report.pdf.
137.
Lightbourne, M., Dutfield, G.: Literature Review and Commentary on Legal Regimes and Models for Protecting Plant Varieties, http://www.ecologic.de/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_legal_literature_review.pdf.
138.
Rangnekar, D.: Review of the Economic Literature on Plant Breeders’ Rights, http://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_economic_literature_review.pdf.
139.
Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Bulgaria, http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_bulgaria_case_study.pdf.
140.
Lightbourne, M., Muraguri, L.: Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: China, http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_china_case_study.pdf.
141.
Lightbourne, M.: Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Ethiopia, http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_ethiopia_case_study.pdf.
142.
Rangnekar, D.: Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: India, http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_india_case_study.pdf.
143.
Rangnekar, D.: Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Kenya, http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_kenya_case_study.pdf.
144.
Ivanov, I., Yildiz, B., Tsonkova, O., Mateeva, T.: Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Turkey, http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_turkey_case_study.pdf.
145.
Borowiak, C.: Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics & Society. 32, 511–543 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979.
146.
Borowiak, C.: Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics and Society. 32, 511–543 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979.
147.
Oguamanam, C.: Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends. Dalhousie Law Journal. 29, 413–454 (2006).
148.
Van Overwalle, G.: Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology. 39, 143–149 (1998).
149.
Patel, R.: Food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies. 36, 663–706 (2009).
150.
Patel, R.: Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 36, 663–706 (2009).
151.
Rangnekar, D.: Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 19, 359–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
152.
Rangnekar, D.: Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 19, 359–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
153.
de Schutter, O.: The right to food: Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation, http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20091021_report-ga64_seed-policies-and-the-right-to-food_en.pdf, (2009).
154.
Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark, supported by the French Republic and the United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, supported by the Hellenic Republic, Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0465:EN:PDF, (2005).
155.
Rangnekar, D.: Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 43, 2043–2059 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
156.
Rangnekar, D.: Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning. 43, 2043–2059 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
157.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
158.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
159.
Rangnekar, D.: Geographical indications: A review of proposals at the TRIPs Council – Extending article 23 to products other than wines and spirits, http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/06/cs_rangnekar.pdf, (2003).
160.
Rangnekar, D.: The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of evidence from Europe, http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/07/a.pdf, (2004).
161.
Yu, P.K.: Intellectual property and information wealth: issues and practices in the digital age. Praeger Publishers, Westport, Conn (2007).
162.
Rangnekar, D.: Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1564624, (2009).
163.
Rangnekar, D.: The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13,.
164.
Rangnekar, D.: The journal of world intellectual property. 13,.
165.
Correa, C.M.: Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK (2010).
166.
Broude, T.: Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 26, (2005).
167.
Broude, T.: Taking ‘trade and culture’ seriously: Geographical indications and cultural protection in WTO law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international law. 26, 623–692 (2005).
168.
Coombe, R.J.: Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 1, 35–52 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1191/1743872105lw010oa.
169.
Evans, G.E., Blakeney, M.: The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of international economic law. 9, 575–614 (2006).
170.
Evans, G.E., Blakeney, M.: The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of International Economic Law. 9, 575–614 (2006).
171.
Rangnekar, D.: Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 43, 2043–2059 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
172.
Rangnekar, D.: Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and planning. 43, 2043–2059 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
173.
Rangnekar, D., Kumar, S.: Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 202–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x.
174.
Rangnekar, D., Kumar, S.: Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 202–230 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x.
175.
Raustiala, K., Munzer, S.R.: The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications. European Journal of International Law. 18, 337–365 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm016.
176.
Sunder, M.: Invention of Traditional Knowledge, The. Law and Contemporary Problems. 70, (2007).
177.
Sunder, M.: The invention of traditional knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems. 70, 97–124 (2007).
178.
Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Report of the Panel, http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds160_e.htm, (15)AD.
179.
Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
180.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development: Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005).
181.
Orit Fischman Afori.: The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 392–417 (2013).
182.
Afori, O.F.: The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 44, 392–417 (2013).
183.
Boyle, J.: The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, (2003).
184.
Boyle, J.: The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 66, 33–74 (2003).
185.
David J. Brennan: The three step test frenzy - why the TRIPs panel decision might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2002).
186.
Brennan, D.J.: The three steps test frenzy: why the TRIPs Panel might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 212–225 (2002).
187.
Chon, M.: Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education. U.C. Davis Law Review. 40, 803–854 (2007).
188.
Philippa Davies.: Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. 402–414 (2013).
189.
Davies, P.: Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. 35, 402–414 (2013).
190.
Helfer, L.R.: World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. Boston University Law Review. 80, 93–204 (2000).
191.
Lange, D.: Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, (2003).
192.
Lange, D.: Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 66, 463–483 (2003).
193.
Okediji, R.: TRIPs Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law Part II. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49, 585–648 (2001).
194.
Richard Owens: TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European Intellectual Property Review. 25, (2003).
195.
Owens, R.: TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European intellectual property review. 25, 49–54 (2003).
196.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion of the Court, http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/04-480P.ZO, (2005).
197.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion and individual judges’ opinions, https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/04-480.pdf, (2005).
198.
Thomas Hays: The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. (2006).
199.
Hays, T.: Secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review. 29, 15–21 (2007).
200.
Hays, T.: The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Parts 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 617–624 (2006).
201.
Boyle, J.: The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain, http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=lcp, (2003).
202.
Boyle, J.: The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, 33–74 (2003).
203.
Lee A. Bygrave.: The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review. 51–57 (2002).
204.
Bygrave, L.A.: The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review. 24, 51–57 (2002).
205.
Helton, M.: Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems. 40, 1–36 (2006).
206.
Lee, Edward: The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics. 62, 147–162 (2005).
207.
Lee, E.: The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics. 62, 147–162 (2005).
208.
Lunney, G.S.Jr.: Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, The. Virginia Law Review. 87, (2001).
209.
Lunney, G.S.: The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Virginia law review. 87, 813–920 (2001).
210.
Lerner, J., Stern, S. eds: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10. University of Chicago Press (2010).
211.
Maskus, K.E.: Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Vanderbilt Law Review. 53, (2000).
212.
Maskus, K.E.: Lessons from studying the international economics of intellectual property rights. Vanderbilt law review. 53, 2219–2239 (2000).
213.
Yu, P.K.: A Tale of Two Development Agendas. Ohio Northern University Law Review. 35, 465–574 (2009).
214.
Alston, P.: Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly. 27, 755–829 (2005).
215.
de Beer, J. ed: Implementing WIPO’s Development Agenda. Wilfrid Laurier University Press (2009).
216.
Amy Kapczynski: The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. The Yale Law Journal. 117, 804–885 (2008).
217.
Kapczynski, A.: The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. Yale law journal. 117, 804–885 (2008).
218.
Maskus, K.E., Penubarti, M.: How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics. 39, 227–248 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
219.
Maskus, K.E., Penubarti, M.: How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property-Rights. Journal of international economics. 39, 227–248 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
220.
May, C.: The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 22, 97–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
221.
May, C.: The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 22, 161–170 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
222.
Menescal, A.K.: Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 8, 761–796 (2005).
223.
Menescal, A.K.: Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 8, 761–796 (2005).
224.
Wade, R.H.: What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of International Political Economy. 10, 621–644 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902.
225.
Wade, R.H.: What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of international political economy. 10, 621–644 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902.
226.
Braithwaite, J., Drahos, P.: Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000).
227.
Helfer, L.R.: Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law. 29, 1–84 (2004).
228.
Abbott, F.M.: Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law. ICTSD (2006).
229.
Chimni, B.S.: Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective. International Studies. 29, 135–158 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881792029002001.
230.
Drahos, P.: Global Property Rights in Information: The story of TRIPS at the GATT. Prometheus. 13, 6–19 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029508629187.
231.
Fischer-Lescano, A., Teubner, G.: Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 25, 999–1046 (2004).
232.
Maskus, K.E., Reichman, J.H.: The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of International Economic Law. 7, 279–320 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279.
233.
Maskus, K.E., Reichman, J.H.: The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of international economic law. 7, 279–320 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279.
234.
Sell, S., May, C.: Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 8, 467–500 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110055849.
235.
Sell, S., May, C.: Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 8, 467–500 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110055849.
