Abbott, Frederick M. 2006. Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law. ICTSD. http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/dialogue/2006-05-03/Frederick%20abbott%2012%200405b.pdf.
Abbott, Frederick M. n.d. The International Intellectual Property System : Commentary and Materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.1. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&2%2C2%2C.
———. n.d. The International Intellectual Property System : Commentary and Materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.2. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&1%2C1%2C.
Afori, Orit Fischman. 2013. ‘The Battle over Public E-Libraries - Taking Stock and Moving Ahead’. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 44 (4): 392–417. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7.
Alston, Philip. 2005. ‘Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals’. Human Rights Quarterly 27 (3): 755–829. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20069811.
American Intellectual Property Law Association and William S. Hein & Company. 1984. ‘AIPLA Quarterly Journal’. Electronic resource. http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=AIPLAQJ&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none.
Amy Kapczynski. 2008. ‘The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property’. The Yale Law Journal 117 (5): 804–85. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20455812?origin=crossref.
Anderfelt, Ulf. 1971. International Patent-Legislation and Developing Countries. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Aoki, Keith, and Kennedy Luvai. 2007. ‘Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex’. Michigan State Law Review 2007: 35–70. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mslr2007&collection=journals&id=41.
Arup, Christopher. 2000. The New World Trade Organization Agreements: Globalizing Law through Services and Intellectual Property. Vol. Cambridge studies in law and society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
‘Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country Case Studies: Bulgaria’. n.d. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_bulgaria_case_study.pdf.
Austin, Graeme, and Laurence R. Helfer. 2011. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beer, Jeremy de, ed. 2009. Implementing WIPO’s Development Agenda. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. http://web.idrc.ca/openebooks/454-3/#page_24.
Beier, Friedrich-Karl, Gerhard Schricker, and Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht. 1996. From GATT to TRIPs: The Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights. Vol. IIC studies. studies in industrial and copyright law. Weinheim: VCH.
Bellmann, Christophe, Graham Dutfield, Ricardo Meléndez-Ortiz, and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. 2003. Trading in Knowledge: Development Perspectives on TRIPS, Trade, and Sustainability. London: Earthscan Publications.
Bertin, Gilles Y., and Sally Wyatt. 1988. Multinationals and Industrial Property: The Control of the World’s Technology. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Blakeney, Michael. 1996. Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Concise Guide to the TRIPS Agreement. Vol. Intellectual property in practice. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Boldrin, Michele, and David K. Levine. 2008a. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511510854.
———. 2008b. Against Intellectual Monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Borowiak, C. 2004. ‘Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds’. Politics & Society 32 (4): 511–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979.
Borowiak, Craig. 2004. ‘Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds’. Politics and Society 32 (4): 511–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979.
Boyle, James. 2003a. ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’. Law and Contemporary Problems 66. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
———. 2003b. ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’. Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (1–2): 33–74. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&collection=journals&id=39.
———. 2003c. ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’. Law and Contemporary Problems. Duke University. http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=lcp.
———. 2003d. ‘The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain’. Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (1): 33–74. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20059171.
Braga, Carlos Alberto Primo, Carsten Fink, Claudia Paz Sepulveda, and World Bank. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights and Economic Development. Vol. World Bank discussion paper. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank.
Braithwaite, John, and Peter Drahos. 2000. Global Business Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brennan, David J. 2002. ‘The Three Steps Test Frenzy: Why the TRIPs Panel Might Be Considered per Incuriam’. Intellectual Property Quarterly, no. 2: 212–25. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Broude, Tomer. 2005a. ‘Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 26. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&div=24&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
———. 2005b. ‘Taking “Trade and Culture” Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law 26 (4): 623–92. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&collection=journals&id=639.
Bygrave, Lee A. 2002. ‘The Technologisation of Copyright: Implications for Privacy and Related Interests’. European Intellectual Property Review 24 (2): 51–57. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICF96B900E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838.
Centre for Legal and Business Information and LexisNexis (Firm). n.d. ‘Intellectual Property Newsletter’. Electronic resource. http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB04STJrnlsSrch&csi=280316.
Chang, Ha-Joon. 2001. Intellectual Property Rights and Economics Development: Historical Lessons and Emerging Issues. Vol. Intellectual property rights series. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network.
Charnovitz, S. 2002. ‘The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations’. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 207–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207.
Charnovitz, Steve. 2002. ‘The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations’. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (1): 207–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207.
Chimni, B. S. 1992. ‘Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective’. International Studies 29 (2): 135–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881792029002001.
Chon, Margaret. 2007. ‘Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education’. U.C. Davis Law Review 40 (3): 803–54. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/davlr40&collection=journals&id=811.
Coombe, Rosemary J. 1998. The Cultural Life of Intellectual Properties: Authorship, Appropriation, and the Law. Vol. Post-contemporary interventions. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press.
———. 2005. ‘Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference’. Law, Culture and the Humanities 1 (1): 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1191/1743872105lw010oa.
‘Copyright World’. n.d.
Cornish, W. R., David Llewelyn, and Tanya Frances Aplin. 2013. Intellectual Property: Patents, Copyright, Trade Marks and Allied Rights. Eighth edition. Vol. Classics series. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
Cornish, W. R., D. Vaver, and Lionel Bently. 2004. Intellectual Property in the New Millennium: Essays in Honour of William R. Cornish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Correa, Carlos María. 2000. Intellectual Property Rights, the WTO and Developing Countries: The TRIPS Agreement and Policy Options. London: Zed.
———. 2010a. Research Handbook on the Interpretation and Enforcement of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Vol 2. Vol. Intellectual property in the WTO. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
———. 2010b. Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Vol. Research handbooks on the WTO. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
———. 2010c. Research Handbook on the Protection of Intellectual Property under WTO Rules. Vol 1. Vol. Research handbooks on the WTO. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Correa, Carlos María, and Abdulqawi Yusuf. 1998. Intellectual Property and International Trade: The TRIPs Agreement. London: Kluwer Law International.
Cottier, Thomas, and Petros C. Mavroidis. 2003. Intellectual Property: Trade, Competition, and Sustainable Development. Vol. World Trade Forum. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
D’Amato, Anthony A., and Doris E. Long. 1997. International Intellectual Property Law. London: Kluwer Law International.
David J. Brennan. 2002. ‘The Three Step Test Frenzy - Why the TRIPs Panel Decision Might Be Considered per Incuriam’. Intellectual Property Quarterly. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014912ee97a388f087e4&docguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=20&spos=20&epos=20&td=26&crumb-action=append&context=30&resolvein=true.
Davies, Philippa. 2013. ‘Access v Contract: Competing Freedoms in the Context of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries’. European Intellectual Property Review 35 (7): 402–14. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A11BCA0D30E11E2B5068DA33E169237.
Dinwoodie, Graeme B., William O. Hennessey, and Shira Perlmutter. 2001. International Intellectual Property Law and Policy. Vol. Casebook series. Newark, N.J.: LexisNexis.
Drahos, Peter. 1995. ‘Global Property Rights in Information: The Story of TRIPS at the GATT’. Prometheus 13 (1): 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029508629187.
———. 1996. A Philosophy of Intellectual Property. Aldershot: Dartmouth.
———. 1999. Intellectual Property. Vol. The international library of essays in law and legal theory. Second series. Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth.
Drahos, Peter, and John Braithwaite. 2002. Information Feudalism: Who Owns the Knowledge Economy? London: Earthscan.
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper, Diane L. Zimmerman, and Harry First. 2001. Expanding the Boundaries of Intellectual Property: Innovation Policy for the Knowledge Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Duncan Matthews. 2006. ‘From the August 30, 2003 WTO Decision to the December 6, 2005 Agreement on an Amendment to TRIPS: Improving Access to Medicines in Developing Countries?’ Intellectual Property Quarterly, 91–130. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IBD9A3D30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=I123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&suppsrguid=i0ad82d08000001490db9d4313f13979b&spos=7&epos=7&td=15&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D15%26spos%3D7%26rank%3D7%26epos%3D7%26hitguid%3DI123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%26docguid%3DI123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%26resolvein%3Dtrue%26srguid%3Di0ad82d08000001490db9d4313f13979b%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D49&crumb-action=append&context=50.
Dutfield, Graham. 2009. Intellectual Property Rights and the Life Science Industries: Past, Present and Future. 2nd ed. Singapore: World Scientific.
Dutfield, Graham, and Uma Suthersanen. 2008. Global Intellectual Property Law: Commentary and Materials. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dwijen Rangnekar. 2006. ‘No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime’. Economic and Political Weekly 41 (5): 409–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4417764.
Edwin C. Hettinger. 1989. ‘Justifying Intellectual Property’. Philosophy & Public Affairs 18 (1): 31–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265190.
‘European Intellectual Property Review’. n.d. Electronic resource. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I43D027A1A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true.
‘———’. n.d.
Evans, G.E, and M Blakeney. 2006a. ‘The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis?’ Journal of International Economic Law 9 (3): 575–614. http://0-jiel.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/9/3/575.full?sid=d1a978ba-7e6e-4c58-ad88-658de03bd846.
Evans, G.E., and Michael Blakeney. 2006b. ‘The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis?’ Journal of International Economic Law 9 (3): 575–614. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/jiel/jgl016.
Fawcett, J. J., and Paul Torremans. 1998. Intellectual Property and Private International Law. Vol. Oxford monographs in private international law. Oxford: Clarendon.
‘Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark, Supported by the French Republic and the United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, Supported by the Hellenic Republic, Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02’. 2005. Court of Justice of the European Communities. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0465:EN:PDF.
‘Final Report- Impact of the IPR Rules on Sustainable Development’. n.d. http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_final_report.pdf.
Finger, J. M., and Philip Schuler. 2004. Poor People’s Knowledge: Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries. Vol. Trade and development series. [Washington, D.C.]: Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press.
Fink, Carsten, and Keith E. Maskus, eds. n.d. Intellectual Property and Development: Lessons from Recent Economic Research. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas, and Gunther Teubner. 2004. ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’. Michigan Journal of International Law 25 (4): 999–1046. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mjil25&collection=journals&id=1013.
George Washington University, Franklin Pierce Law Center, LexisNexis (Firm), and William S. Hein & Company. n.d. ‘Idea’. Electronic resource. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/idea&collection=journals.
Gervais, Daniel J. 2008. The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters.
Goldstein, Paul. 2001. International Intellectual Property Law: Cases and Materials. Vol. University casebook series. New York: Foundation Press.
Goodin, Robert E., Philip Pettit, and Thomas Pogge. 2007. A Companion to Contemporary Political Philosophy. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub.
Gosseries, Axel, Alain Marciano, and Alain Strowel. 2008a. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Electronic resource. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230582392.
———. 2008b. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2008c. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Electronic resource. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230582392.
———. 2008d. Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan.
Great Britain. 2002. ‘Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy’. CIPR. 2002. http://www.iprcommission.org/graphic/documents/final_report.htm.
———. 2002. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy. London: CIPR.
Hays, Thomas. 2006. ‘The Evolution and Decentralisation of Secondary Liability for Infringements of Copyright-Protected Works: Parts 1’. European Intellectual Property Review 28 (12): 617–24. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4.
———. 2007. ‘Secondary Liability for Infringements of Copyright-Protected Works: Part 2’. European Intellectual Property Review 29 (1): 15–21. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFD16C74083FB11DBB44ACB7302E2F64A.
Heath, Christopher, and Anselm Kamperman Sanders. 2005a. New Frontiers of Intellectual Property Law: IP and Cultural Heritage, Geographical Indicators, Enforcement, Overprotection. Electronic resource. Oxford: Hart Publishing. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000356.html.
———. 2005b. New Frontiers of Intellectual Property Law: IP and Cultural Heritage, Geographical Indicators, Enforcement, Overprotection. Vol. IIC studies. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
Helfer, Laurence R. 2000. ‘World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act’. Boston University Law Review 80 (1): 93–204. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/bulr80&collection=journals&id=107.
———. 2004. ‘Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking’. Yale Journal of International Law 29 (1): 1–84. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil29&collection=journals&id=11.
Helfer, Laurence R., and Graeme Austin. 2011. Human Rights and Intellectual Property: Mapping the Global Interface. Electronic resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302910&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Helton, Matthew. 2006. ‘Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce’. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 40 (1): 1–36. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/collsp40&collection=journals&id=13.
Hettinger, Edwin C. 1989. ‘Justifying Intellectual Property’. Philosophy and Public Affairs 18 (1): 31–52. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265190.
Howse, Robert. 2000. ‘The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 3 (4): 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x.
———. n.d. ‘The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 3 (4): 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x.
Hughes, Justin. 1988. ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’. The Georgetown Law Journal 77. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj77&div=19&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#309.
Hughes, Justin. 1988. ‘The Philosophy of Intellectual Property’. The Georgetown Law Journal 77 (2): 287–366. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj77&collection=journals&id=309.
‘Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law’. n.d.
Intellectual Property Institute. 1997. ‘Intellectual Property Quarterly’. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I4A579A40A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true.
———. n.d. ‘Intellectual Property Quarterly’.
Ivanov, Ivan, Burcak Yildiz, Ofelia Tsonkova, and Tatiana Mateeva. n.d. ‘Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country Case Studies: Turkey’. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_turkey_case_study.pdf.
Jakkrit Kuanpoth. 2006. ‘Patents and Access to Medicines in Thailand - the ddI Case and Beyond.’ Intellectual Property Quarterly, 149–58. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d08000001490db35ec1276c2725&docguid=I123B4501E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&hitguid=IBD9A8B50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=19&resolvein=true.
‘Journal of International Economic Law’. 1998. Electronic resource. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/jiel.
‘———’. n.d.
Kapczynski, Amy. 2008. ‘The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property’. Yale Law Journal 117 (5): 804–85. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20455812.
Keith Aoki. 2008. Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic Resources. Hardcover. Carolina Academic Pr.
Kuanpoth, Jakkrit. 2006. ‘Patents and Access to Medicines in Thailand – the DDI Case and Beyond’. Intellectual Property Quarterly, no. 2: 149–58. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I123B4501E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838.
Landes, William M., and Richard A. Posner. 2003. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Lange, David. 2003a. ‘Reimagining the Public Domain’. Law and Contemporary Problems 66. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
———. 2003b. ‘Reimagining the Public Domain’. Law and Contemporary Problems 66 (1–2): 463–83. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&collection=journals&id=471.
Lee A. Bygrave. 2002. ‘The Technologisation of Copyright: Implications for Privacy and Related Interests.’ European Intellectual Property Review, 51–57. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001491322b0afa5b789a0&docguid=ICF96B900E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&hitguid=IB775AB10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=37&resolvein=true.
Lee, Edward. 2005. ‘The Ethics of Innovation: P2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine’. Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2): 147–62. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/198095899?accountid=14888.
Lee, Edward. 2005. ‘The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine’. Journal of Business Ethics 62 (2): 147–62. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/198095899?accountid=14888.
Lerner, Josh, and Scott Stern, eds. 2010. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10. University of Chicago Press. http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11764.pdf.
LexisNexis (Firm). 1978. ‘Intellectual Property Decisions’. Electronic resource. http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB04STJrnlsSrch&csi=280314.
Lightbourne, Muriel. n.d. ‘Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country Case Studies: Ethiopia’. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_ethiopia_case_study.pdf.
Lightbourne, Muriel, and Graham Dutfield. n.d. ‘Literature Review and Commentary on Legal Regimes and Models for Protecting Plant Varieties’. http://www.ecologic.de/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_legal_literature_review.pdf.
Lightbourne, Muriel, and Lois Muraguri. n.d. ‘Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country Case Studies: China’. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_china_case_study.pdf.
Lunney, Glynn S. 2001. ‘The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act’. Virginia Law Review 87 (5): 813–920. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr87&collection=journals&id=831.
Lunney, Glynn S. Jr. 2001. ‘Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, The’. Virginia Law Review 87. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr87&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
Malbon, Justin, and Charles Lawson. 2008. Interpreting and Implementing the TRIPS Agreement: Is It Fair? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
‘Managing Intellectual Property’. n.d. Electronic resource. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/30314.
‘———’. n.d.
Maskus, K. E., and Jerome H Reichman. 2004. ‘The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods’. Journal of International Economic Law 7 (2): 279–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279.
Maskus, Keith E. 2000a. Intellectual Property Rights in the Global Economy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics.
———. 2000b. ‘Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights’. Vanderbilt Law Review 53. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr53&div=69&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
———. 2000c. ‘Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights’. Vanderbilt Law Review 53 (6): 2219–39. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr53&collection=journals&id=2247.
Maskus, Keith E., and Mohan Penubarti. 1995a. ‘How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property-Rights’. Journal of International Economics 39 (3–4): 227–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
———. 1995b. ‘How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property Rights?’ Journal of International Economics 39 (3–4): 227–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
Maskus, Keith E., and J. H. Reichman. 2005a. International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Electronic resource. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42229&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005b. International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology under a Globalized Intellectual Property Regime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Maskus, Keith E, and Jerome H Reichman. 2004. ‘The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods’. Journal of International Economic Law 7 (2): 279–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279.
Matthews, Duncan. 2002. Globalizing Intellectual Property Rights: The TRIPs Agreement. London: Routledge.
———. 2006. ‘From the August 30, 2003 WTO Decision to the December 6, 2005 Agreement on an Amendment to TRIPS: Improving Access to Medicines in Developing Countries?’ Intellectual Property Quarterly, no. 2: 91–130. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBD9A3D30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. n.d. ‘IIC: International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law’. Electronic resource. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.IB2135AA0A70911DDA77AF52796FF0BEB&ndd=2&athens=true.
———. n.d. ‘International Review of Industrial Property and Copyright Law’.
May, Christopher. 2008a. ‘The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda’. Global Society 22 (1): 161–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
———. 2008b. ‘The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda’. Global Society 22 (1): 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
May, Christopher, and Susan K. Sell. 2006a. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Vol. Ipolitics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienners Publishers.
———. 2006b. Intellectual Property Rights: A Critical History. Vol. Ipolitics. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienners Publishers.
Mazzoleni, Roberto, and Richard R. Nelson. 1998. ‘Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents’. Journal of Economic Issues 32 (4): 1031–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506108.
Menescal, Andrea Koury. 2005a. ‘Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 8 (6): 761–96. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x/full.
———. 2005b. ‘Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 8 (6): 761–96. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x/pdf.
Merges, Robert P., Peter Seth Menell, and Mark A. Lemley. 2003. Intellectual Property in the New Technological Age. 3rd. ed. New York: Aspen Publishers.
‘Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion and Individual Judges’ Opinions’. 2005. United States Supreme Court. https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/04-480.pdf.
‘Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion of the Court’. 2005. United States Supreme Court. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/04-480P.ZO.
Morin, J.-F., and E. R. Gold. 2010. ‘Consensus-Seeking, Distrust and Rhetorical Entrapment: The WTO Decision on Access to Medicines’. European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 563–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366054.
Morin, J-F, and E.R. Gold. 2010. ‘Consensus-Seeking, Distrust and Rhetorical Entrapment: The WTO Decision on Access to Medicines’. European Journal of International Relations 16 (4): 563–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366054.
‘Novartis Ag vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 April, 2013’. n.d. http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/.
Nowak, Kevin J. 2005. ‘Staying within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27’. Michigan Journal of International Law 26. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mjil26&collection=journals&id=917.
Oguamanam, Chidi. 2006. ‘Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends’. Dalhousie Law Journal 29 (2): 413–54. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/dalholwj29&collection=journals&id=417.
———. 2012. Intellectual Property in Global Governance: A Development Question. Electronic resource. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=346025&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Okediji, Ruth. 2001. ‘TRIPs Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law Part II’. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49 (2): 585–648. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jocoso49&collection=journals&id=626.
Orit Fischman Afori. 2013. ‘The Battle over Public E-Libraries - Taking Stock and Moving Ahead.’ International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, 392–417. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7&hitguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014912deb619bca2ca01&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D3%26spos%3D1%26rank%3D1%26suppsrguid%3Di0ad8289e0000014912deb619bca2ca01%26epos%3D1%26hitguid%3DIF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7%26docguid%3DI3548911003BC11E3BCC6ADB745F40E91%26resolvein%3Dtrue%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D10&crumb-action=append&context=17.
Owens, Richard. 2003. ‘TRIPs and the Fairness in Music Arbitration: The Repercussions’. European Intellectual Property Review 25: 49–54. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IB75D1A00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Patel, R. 2009a. ‘Food Sovereignty’. Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 663–706. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03066150903143079.
———. 2009b. ‘Food Sovereignty’. The Journal of Peasant Studies 36 (3): 663–706. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03066150903143079.
‘Patent World’. n.d.
Philippa Davies. 2013. ‘Access v Contract: Competing Freedoms in the Context of Copyright Limitations and Exceptions for Libraries.’ European Intellectual Property Review, 402–14. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I3A11BCA0D30E11E2B5068DA33E169237&crumb-action=append&context=66.
Pogge, Thomas W. 2005. ‘Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme’. Metaphilosophy 36 (1–2): 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
Pogge, T.W. 2005. ‘Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme’. Metaphilosophy 36 (1–2): 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
Pugatch, Meir Perez. 2004. The International Political Economy of Intellectual Property Rights. Vol. New horizons in intellectual property. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Rangnekar, Dwijen. 1013. ‘The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South’. Economic and Political Weekly 48 (32): 39–40. http://0-www.epw.in.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/glivec-precedent/supreme-court-judgment.html.
———. 2003. ‘Geographical Indications: A Review of Proposals at the TRIPs Council – Extending Article 23 to Products Other than Wines and Spirits’. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development. http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/06/cs_rangnekar.pdf.
———. 2004. ‘The Socio-Economics of Geographical Indications: A Review of Evidence from Europe’. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development. http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/07/a.pdf.
———. 2006. ‘No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime’. Economic and Political Weekly 41 (5): 409–17. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4417764.
———. 2007a. ‘Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10 (5): 365–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
———. 2007b. ‘Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 10 (5): 365–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
———. 2009. ‘Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni’. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1564624.
———. 2011a. ‘Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni’. Environment and Planning A 43 (9): 2043–59. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
———. 2011b. ‘Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni’. Environment and Planning 43 (9): 2043–59. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
———. 2011c. ‘Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni’. Environment and Planning A 43 (9): 2043–59. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
———. 2011d. ‘Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni’. Environment and Planning 43 (9): 2043–59. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
———. 2013. ‘The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South’. Economic and Political Weekly 48 (32): 39–40. http://0-www.epw.in.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/glivec-precedent/supreme-court-judgment.html.
———. 2014a. ‘Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya’. New Political Economy 19 (3): 359–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
———. 2014b. ‘Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya’. New Political Economy 19 (3): 359–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
———. n.d. ‘Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country Case Studies: India’. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_india_case_study.pdf.
———. n.d. ‘Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country Case Studies: Kenya’. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_kenya_case_study.pdf.
———. n.d. ‘Review of the Economic Literature on Plant Breeders’ Rights’. http://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_economic_literature_review.pdf.
———. n.d. ‘The Journal of World Intellectual Property’ 13 (2). http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/jwip.2010.13.issue-2/issuetoc.
———. n.d. ‘The Journal of World Intellectual Property’ 13 (2).
Rangnekar, Dwijen, and Sanjay Kumar. 2010a. ‘Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13 (2): 202–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x.
———. 2010b. ‘Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication’. The Journal of World Intellectual Property 13 (2): 202–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x.
Raustiala, K., and S. R. Munzer. 2007. ‘The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications’. European Journal of International Law 18 (2): 337–65. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm016.
Reichman, J.H. 1995. ‘Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement’. International Lawyer (ABA) 29. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr29&div=35&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
Reichman, J.H. 1995. ‘Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement’. International Lawyer 29 (2): 345–88. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr29&collection=journals&id=355.
‘Research Project: Impacts of the Intellectual Property Rights Rules on Sustainable Development’. n.d. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/projects/ipdev/.
Resnik, D. B. 2003a. ‘A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property’. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4): 319–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384.
———. 2003b. ‘A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property’. Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4): 319–35. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384.
Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. 2005a. Electronic resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005b. Electronic resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005c. Electronic resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005d. Electronic resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005e. Electronic resource. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Richard Owens. 2003. ‘TRIPs and the Fairness in Music Arbitration: The Repercussions’. European Intellectual Property Review 25. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?src=toce&docguid=IB75D1A00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=7.
Richards, Donald. 2004. Intellectual Property Rights and Global Capitalism: The Political Economy of the TRIPS Agreement. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
Roberto Mazzoleni and Richard R. Nelson. 1998. ‘Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents’. Journal of Economic Issues 32 (4): 1031–52. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4227385.
Ryan, Michael P. 1998. Knowledge Diplomacy: Global Competition and the Politics of Intellectual Property. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Scherer, F. M, and Jayashree Watal. 2002a. ‘Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations’. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (4): 913–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
Scherer, F. M., and Jayashree Watal. 2002b. ‘Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations’. Journal of International Economic Law 5 (4): 913–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
Schutter, Olivier de. 2009. ‘The Right to Food: Seed Policies and the Right to Food: Enhancing Agrobiodiversity and Encouraging Innovation’. United Nations. http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20091021_report-ga64_seed-policies-and-the-right-to-food_en.pdf.
‘Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Report of the Panel’. 15AD. WTO Secretariat. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds160_e.htm.
Sell, Susan K. 1998. Power and Ideas: North-South Politics of Intellectual Property and Antitrust. Vol. SUNY series in global politics. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press.
Sell, Susan K., and Aseem Prakash. 2004. ‘Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights’. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 143–75. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3693567.
Sell, Susan, and Christopher May. 2001a. ‘Moments in Law: Contestation and Settlement in the History of Intellectual Property’. Review of International Political Economy 8 (3): 467–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110055849.
———. 2001b. ‘Moments in Law: Contestation and Settlement in the History of Intellectual Property’. Review of International Political Economy 8 (3): 467–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110055849.
Sherwood, Robert M. 1990. Intellectual Property and Economic Development. Vol. Westview special studies in science, technology, and public policy. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sunder, Madhavi. 2007a. ‘Invention of Traditional Knowledge, The’. Law and Contemporary Problems 70. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp70&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
———. 2007b. ‘The Invention of Traditional Knowledge’. Law and Contemporary Problems 70 (2): 97–124. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp70&collection=journals&id=459.
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash. 2004. ‘Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights’. International Studies Quarterly 48 (1): 143–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693567?seq=1&Search=yes&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq1%3D%26amp%3Bq4%3D%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bq0%3DThe%2Bcontest%2Bbetween%2Bbusiness%2Band%2BNGO%2Bnetworks%2Bin%2Bintellectual%2Bproperty%2Brights%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq6%3D%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bq2%3D%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bacc%3Doff%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND&prevSearch=&resultsServiceName=null.
Tansey, Geoff, and Tasmin Rajotte. 2008. The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity and Food Security. London: Earthscan.
‘The Journal of World Intellectual Property’. n.d. Electronic resource. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1796.
‘The Journal of World Intellectual Property’. n.d.
Thomas Hays. 2006. ‘The Evolution and Decentralisation of Secondary Liability for Infringements of Copyright-Protected Works: Part 1’. European Intellectual Property Review. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014913177a772ecc76c2&docguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4&hitguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=15&crumb-action=append&context=22&resolvein=true.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. 2005a. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005b. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005c. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005d. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005e. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
United States Trademark Association, International Trademark Association, LexisNexis (Firm), and William S. Hein & Company. n.d. ‘The Trade-Mark Reporter’. http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB00STGenSrch&csi=10751.
University of Georgia, LexisNexis (Firm), and William S. Hein & Company. n.d. ‘The Journal of Intellectual Property Law’. Electronic resource. http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=JIPL&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none.
University of Texas at Austin, State Bar of Texas, and William S. Hein & Company. n.d. ‘Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal’. Electronic resource. http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=TXIPLJ&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none.
Van Overwalle, Geertrui. 1998. ‘Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches’. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 39 (2): 143–49. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/idea39&collection=journals&id=153.
Wade, Robert Hunter. 2003a. ‘What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of “Development Space”’. Review of International Political Economy 10 (4): 621–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902.
———. 2003b. ‘What Strategies Are Viable for Developing Countries Today? The World Trade Organization and the Shrinking of “Development Space”’. Review of International Political Economy 10 (4): 621–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902.
Wadlow, Christopher. 1998. Enforcement of Intellectual Property in European and International Law: The New Private International Law of Intellectual Property in the United Kingdom and the European Community. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
Wallerstein, Mitchel B., Mary Ellen Mogee, Roberta A. Schoen, National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), and National Research Council (U.S.). 1993. Global Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights in Science and Technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Watal, Jayashree. 2003. Intellectual Property Rights in the WTO and Developing Countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Weissman, Robert. 1996. ‘Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law 17. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel17&div=43&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear.
Weissman, Robert. 1996. ‘Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries’. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic 17 (4): 1069–1125. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel17&collection=journals&id=1081.
Wijk, J van. 2004a. ‘Terminating Piracy or Legitimate Seed Saving? The Use of Copy-Protection Technology in Seeds’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16 (1): 121–41. http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0953732032000175544.
———. 2004b. ‘Terminating Piracy or Legitimate Seed Saving? The Use of Copy-Protection Technology in Seeds’. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 16 (1): 121–41. http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0953732032000175544.
‘WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use’. n.d. http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/.
World Intellectual Property Organization. 2004. WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use. 2nd ed. Vol. WIPO publication. Geneva: WIPO.
World Trade Organisation. 2000. ‘WTO/DSP (2000) Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products – Report of the Panel’. http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/7428d.pdf.
Yu, Peter K. 2007. Intellectual Property and Information Wealth: Issues and Practices in the Digital Age. Vol. Praeger perspectives. Westport, Conn: Praeger Publishers.
———. 2009. ‘A Tale of Two Development Agendas’. Ohio Northern University Law Review 35 (2): 465–574. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/onulr35&collection=journals&id=469.
