1.
Dutfield G, Suthersanen U. Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2008.
2.
WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use [Internet]. Available from: http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/
3.
World Intellectual Property Organization. WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use. 2nd ed. Geneva: WIPO; 2004.
4.
Dinwoodie GB, Hennessey WO, Perlmutter S. International intellectual property law and policy. Newark, N.J.: LexisNexis; 2001.
5.
Goldstein P. International intellectual property law: cases and materials. New York: Foundation Press; 2001.
6.
Gervais DJ. The TRIPS agreement: drafting history and analysis. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters; 2008.
7.
Drahos P, Braithwaite J. Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy? London: Earthscan; 2002.
8.
Chang HJ. Intellectual property rights and economics development: historical lessons and emerging issues. Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network; 2001.
9.
Resource book on TRIPS and development [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
10.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
11.
Malbon J, Lawson C. Interpreting and implementing the TRIPS agreement: is it fair? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2008.
12.
Great Britain. Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy [Internet]. CIPR; 2002. Available from: http://www.iprcommission.org/graphic/documents/final_report.htm
13.
Great Britain. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. London: CIPR; 2002.
14.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual property and theories of justice [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. Available from: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230582392
15.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
16.
Helfer LR, Austin G. Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=302910&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
17.
Austin G, Helfer LR. Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011.
18.
Abbott, Frederick M. The international intellectual property system : commentary and materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.1. [Internet]. Available from: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&2%2C2%2C
19.
Abbott, Frederick M. The international intellectual property system : commentary and materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.2. [Internet]. Available from: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ/XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System/1%2C4%2C4%2CB/frameset&FF=XCottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&searchscope=1&SORT=DZ&extended=0&SUBKEY=Cottier+The+International+Intellectual+Property+System&1%2C1%2C
20.
Anderfelt U. International patent-legislation and developing countries. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1971.
21.
Keith Aoki. Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic Resources. Carolina Academic Pr; 2008.
22.
Arup C. The new World Trade Organization agreements: globalizing law through services and intellectual property. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
23.
Beier FK, Schricker G, Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Strafrecht. From GATT to TRIPs: the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. Weinheim: VCH; 1996.
24.
Bertin GY, Wyatt S. Multinationals and industrial property: the control of the world’s technology. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1988.
25.
Bellmann C, Dutfield G, Meléndez-Ortiz R, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Trading in knowledge: development perspectives on TRIPS, trade, and sustainability. London: Earthscan Publications; 2003.
26.
Blakeney M. Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: a concise guide to the TRIPS agreement. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1996.
27.
Boldrin M, Levine DK. Against Intellectual Monopoly [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2008. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511510854
28.
Boldrin M, Levine DK. Against intellectual monopoly. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
29.
Braga CAP, Fink C, Sepulveda CP, World Bank. Intellectual property rights and economic development. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank; 2000.
30.
Coombe RJ. The cultural life of intellectual properties: authorship, appropriation, and the law. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 1998.
31.
Cornish WR, Llewelyn D, Aplin TF. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Eighth edition. London: Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters; 2013.
32.
Correa CM. Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: the TRIPS agreement and policy options. London: Zed; 2000.
33.
Correa CM, Yusuf A. Intellectual property and international trade: the TRIPs agreement. London: Kluwer Law International; 1998.
34.
Correa CM. Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 1. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2010.
35.
Correa CM. Research handbook on the interpretation and enforcement of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 2. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar; 2010.
36.
Cottier T, Mavroidis PC. Intellectual property: trade, competition, and sustainable development. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 2003.
37.
D’Amato AA, Long DE. International intellectual property law. London: Kluwer Law International; 1997.
38.
Drahos P. A philosophy of intellectual property. Aldershot: Dartmouth; 1996.
39.
Drahos P. Intellectual property. Aldershot: Ashgate Dartmouth; 1999.
40.
Dreyfuss RC, Zimmerman DL, First H. Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
41.
Dutfield G. Intellectual property rights and the life science industries: past, present and future. 2nd ed. Singapore: World Scientific; 2009.
42.
Fawcett JJ, Torremans P. Intellectual property and private international law. Oxford: Clarendon; 1998.
43.
Finger JM, Schuler P. Poor people’s knowledge: promoting intellectual property in developing countries. [Washington, D.C.]: Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press; 2004.
44.
Fink C, Maskus KE, editors. Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research. Washington, DC: World Bank;
45.
Heath C, Kamperman Sanders A. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection [Internet]. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2005. Available from: http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000356.html
46.
Heath C, Kamperman Sanders A. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2005.
47.
Landes WM, Posner RA. The economic structure of intellectual property law. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press; 2003.
48.
Maskus KE. Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics; 2000.
49.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime [Internet]. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42229&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
50.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
51.
Matthews D. Globalizing intellectual property rights: the TRIPs agreement. London: Routledge; 2002.
52.
May C, Sell SK. Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienners Publishers; 2006.
53.
Merges RP, Menell PS, Lemley MA. Intellectual property in the new technological age. 3rd. ed. New York: Aspen Publishers; 2003.
54.
Oguamanam C. Intellectual property in global governance: a development question [Internet]. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2012. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=346025&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
55.
Pugatch MP. The international political economy of intellectual property rights. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2004.
56.
Richards D. Intellectual property rights and global capitalism: the political economy of the TRIPS Agreement. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe; 2004.
57.
Ryan MP. Knowledge diplomacy: global competition and the politics of intellectual property. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press; 1998.
58.
Sell SK. Power and ideas: North-South politics of intellectual property and antitrust. Albany, New York: State University of New York Press; 1998.
59.
Sherwood RM. Intellectual property and economic development. Boulder: Westview Press; 1990.
60.
Cornish WR, Vaver D, Bently L. Intellectual property in the new millennium: essays in honour of William R. Cornish. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
61.
Wallerstein MB, Mogee ME, Schoen RA, National Academy of Sciences (U.S.), National Research Council (U.S.). Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 1993.
62.
Wadlow C. Enforcement of intellectual property in European and international law: the new private international law of intellectual property in the United Kingdom and the European Community. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1998.
63.
Watal J. Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2003.
64.
European intellectual property review. Oxford, [United Kingdom]: ESC Pub; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I43D027A1A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
65.
European intellectual property review. Oxford: ESC Publishing Ltd;
66.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. IIC: international review of industrial property and copyright law. Weinheim/Bergstr: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH [etc.]; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.IB2135AA0A70911DDA77AF52796FF0BEB&ndd=2&athens=true
67.
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht. International review of industrial property and copyright law. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International patent, Copyright, and Competition Law;
68.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly. London: Sweet & Maxwell; 1997; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I4A579A40A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
69.
Intellectual Property Institute. Intellectual property quarterly. London: Sweet and Maxwell;
70.
The Journal of world intellectual property. Geneva: Werner Pub; Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1747-1796
71.
The journal of world intellectual property. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company;
72.
Managing intellectual property. London: Euromoney Publications; Available from: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/30314
73.
Managing intellectual property. London: Euromoney;
74.
American Intellectual Property Law Association, William S. Hein & Company. AIPLA quarterly journal. New York, N.Y.: American Intellectual Property Law Association; 1984; Available from: http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=AIPLAQJ&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none
75.
Copyright World. United Kingdom: Informa Law;
76.
George Washington University, Franklin Pierce Law Center, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. Idea. [Washington, D.C.: Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Research Institute of the George Washington University]; Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/idea&collection=journals
77.
LexisNexis (Firm). Intellectual property decisions. London: Centre for Legal and Business Administration; 1978; Available from: http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB04STJrnlsSrch&csi=280314
78.
Centre for Legal and Business Information, LexisNexis (Firm). Intellectual property newsletter. London: Centre for Legal and Business Information; Available from: http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB04STJrnlsSrch&csi=280316
79.
Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law. United Kingdom: XPL Publishing;
80.
University of Georgia, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The journal of intellectual property law. [Athens, Ga: Students of the University of Georgia School of Law]; Available from: http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=JIPL&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none
81.
Journal of international economic law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 1998; Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/jiel
82.
Journal of international economic law. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
83.
Patent world. St Helier: Armstrong Intellectual Property International;
84.
University of Texas at Austin, State Bar of Texas, William S. Hein & Company. Texas intellectual property law journal. [Austin, Tex.]: University of Texas School of Law; Available from: http://0-www.westlaw.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/search/default.wl?ForceTo=uk.westlaw.com&DB=TXIPLJ&SP=warwicku-000&ClientID=UKLAWSCHOOLS&Action=search&RS=UKIS1.0&VR=1.0&cbhf=none
85.
United States Trademark Association, International Trademark Association, LexisNexis (Firm), William S. Hein & Company. The Trade-mark reporter. New York: United States Trademark Association; Available from: http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/api/version1/sf?sfi=GB00STGenSrch&csi=10751
86.
Edwin C. Hettinger. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1989;18(1):31–52. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265190
87.
Hettinger EC. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs [Internet]. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1989;18(1):31–52. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265190
88.
Roberto Mazzoleni and Richard R. Nelson. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues [Internet]. Association for Evolutionary Economics; 1998;32(4):1031–1052. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4227385
89.
Mazzoleni R, Nelson RR. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues [Internet]. Lincoln: Association for Evolutionary Economics; 1998;32(4):1031–1052. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4227385
90.
Goodin RE, Pettit P, Pogge T. A companion to contemporary political philosophy. 2nd ed. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Pub; 2007.
91.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual property and theories of justice [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008. Available from: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230582392
92.
Gosseries A, Marciano A, Strowel A. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Basingstoke [England]: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
93.
Hughes, Justin. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal [Internet]. Washington D.C: Georgetown University Law Canter; 1988;77. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj77&div=19&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=0&men_tab=srchresults#309
94.
Hughes J. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Law Canter; 1988;77(2):287–366. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/glj77&collection=journals&id=309
95.
May C, Sell SK. Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienners Publishers; 2006.
96.
Resnik DB. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 2003;46(4):319–335.
97.
Resnik DB. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics [Internet]. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 2003;46(4):319–335. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1023/A:1025631902384
98.
Resource book on TRIPS and development [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
99.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
100.
World Trade Organisation. WTO/DSP (2000) Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products – Report of the Panel [Internet]. 2000. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/7428d.pdf
101.
Howse R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 3(4):493–507.
102.
Howse R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times. The Journal of World Intellectual Property [Internet]. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 2000;3(4):493–507. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x
103.
Nowak KJ. Staying within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27. Michigan Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2005;26. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mjil26&collection=journals&id=917
104.
Reichman, J.H. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement. International Lawyer (ABA) [Internet]. Chicago: American Bar Association; 1995;29. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr29&div=35&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
105.
Reichman JH. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement. International lawyer [Internet]. Chicago: American Bar Association; 1995;29(2):345–388. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/intlyr29&collection=journals&id=355
106.
Weissman, Robert. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Law School; 1996;17. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel17&div=43&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
107.
Weissman R. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Law School; 1996;17(4):1069–1125. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel17&collection=journals&id=1081
108.
Novartis Ag vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 April, 2013 [Internet]. Available from: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/
109.
Scherer FM, Watal J. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of International Economic Law. 2002 Dec 1;5(4):913–939.
110.
Scherer FM, Watal J. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of international economic law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002;5(4):913–939. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913
111.
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly [Internet]. Wiley; 2004;48(1):143–175. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3693567?seq=1&Search=yes&list=hide&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoAdvancedSearch%3Fq1%3D%26amp%3Bq4%3D%26amp%3Bc3%3DAND%26amp%3Bq0%3DThe%2Bcontest%2Bbetween%2Bbusiness%2Band%2BNGO%2Bnetworks%2Bin%2Bintellectual%2Bproperty%2Brights%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bc5%3DAND%26amp%3Bpt%3D%26amp%3Bq6%3D%26amp%3Bc4%3DAND%26amp%3Bc1%3DAND%26amp%3Bf3%3Dall%26amp%3Bc6%3DAND%26amp%3Bf6%3Dall%26amp%3Bf4%3Dall%26amp%3Bq3%3D%26amp%3Bf2%3Dall%26amp%3Bed%3D%26amp%3Bf0%3Dall%26amp%3Bisbn%3D%26amp%3Bq2%3D%26amp%3Bsd%3D%26amp%3Bf1%3Dall%26amp%3Bq5%3D%26amp%3Bacc%3Doff%26amp%3Bla%3D%26amp%3Bf5%3Dall%26amp%3Bc2%3DAND&prevSearch=&resultsServiceName=null
112.
Sell SK, Prakash A. Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International studies quarterly [Internet]. Cambridge: Blackwell; 2004;48(1):143–175. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3693567
113.
Charnovitz S. The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations. Journal of International Economic Law. 2002 Mar 1;5(1):207–211.
114.
Charnovitz S. The legal status of the Doha declarations. Journal of international economic law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2002;5(1):207–211. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207
115.
Jakkrit Kuanpoth. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand - the ddI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly [Internet]. 100 Avenue RoadSwiss CottageLond4NW3 3PF: Sweet & Maxwell; 2006;149–158. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad82d08000001490db35ec1276c2725&docguid=I123B4501E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&hitguid=IBD9A8B50E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=2&spos=2&epos=2&td=2&crumb-action=append&context=19&resolvein=true
116.
Kuanpoth J. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand – the DDI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2006;(2):149–158. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I123B4501E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838
117.
Duncan Matthews. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly [Internet]. 100 Avenue RoadSwiss CottageLond4NW3 3PF: Sweet & Maxwell; 2006;91–130. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IBD9A3D30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=I123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838&suppsrguid=i0ad82d08000001490db9d4313f13979b&spos=7&epos=7&td=15&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D15%26spos%3D7%26rank%3D7%26epos%3D7%26hitguid%3DI123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%26docguid%3DI123AF6E0E71311DA915EF37CAC72F838%26resolvein%3Dtrue%26srguid%3Di0ad82d08000001490db9d4313f13979b%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D49&crumb-action=append&context=50
118.
Matthews D. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2006;(2):91–130. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBD9A3D30E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
119.
Morin JF, Gold ER. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European Journal of International Relations. 2010 Dec 1;16(4):563–587.
120.
Morin JF, Gold ER. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European journal of international relations [Internet]. London: Sage Publications; 2010;16(4):563–587. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1354066110366054
121.
Pogge TW. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 2005 Jan;36(1–2):182–209.
122.
Pogge TW. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy [Internet]. Oxford: Published for the Metaphilosophy Foundation Inc. by Blackwell; 2005;36(1–2):182–209. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x
123.
Dwijen Rangnekar. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and Political Weekly [Internet]. Economic and Political Weekly; 2006;41(5):409–417. Available from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4417764
124.
Rangnekar D. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and political weekly [Internet]. Bombay: Sameeksha Trust; 2006;41(5):409–417. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4417764
125.
Rangnekar D. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 2007 Dec 7;10(5):365–387.
126.
Rangnekar D. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The journal of world intellectual property [Internet]. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 2007;10(5):365–387. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x
127.
Rangnekar D. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and political weekly [Internet]. Bombay: Sameeksha Trust; 1013;48(32):39–40. Available from: http://0-www.epw.in.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/glivec-precedent/supreme-court-judgment.html
128.
Rangnekar D. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and Political Weekly [Internet]. Bombay: Sameeksha Trust; 2013;48(32):39–40. Available from: http://0-www.epw.in.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/glivec-precedent/supreme-court-judgment.html
129.
Aoki K, Luvai K. Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex. Michigan State Law Review [Internet]. Michigan State University College of Law; 2007;2007:35–70. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mslr2007&collection=journals&id=41
130.
Resource book on TRIPS and development [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
131.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
132.
van Wijk J. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management [Internet]. Abingdon: Carfax; 2004;16(1):121–141. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0953732032000175544
133.
van Wijk J. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology analysis & strategic management [Internet]. Abingdon: Carfax; 2004;16(1):121–141. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/0953732032000175544
134.
Tansey G, Rajotte T. The future control of food: a guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, biodiversity and food security. London: Earthscan; 2008.
135.
Research Project: Impacts of the Intellectual Property Rights Rules on Sustainable Development [Internet]. Available from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/projects/ipdev/
136.
Final Report- Impact of the IPR rules on Sustainable Development [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_final_report.pdf
137.
Lightbourne M, Dutfield G. Literature Review and Commentary on Legal Regimes and Models for Protecting Plant Varieties [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ecologic.de/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_legal_literature_review.pdf
138.
Rangnekar D. Review of the Economic Literature on Plant Breeders’ Rights [Internet]. Available from: http://www.ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_economic_literature_review.pdf
139.
Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Bulgaria [Internet]. Available from: http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_bulgaria_case_study.pdf
140.
Lightbourne M, Muraguri L. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: China [Internet]. Available from: http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_china_case_study.pdf
141.
Lightbourne M. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Ethiopia [Internet]. Available from: http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_ethiopia_case_study.pdf
142.
Rangnekar D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: India [Internet]. Available from: http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_india_case_study.pdf
143.
Rangnekar D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Kenya [Internet]. Available from: http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_kenya_case_study.pdf
144.
Ivanov I, Yildiz B, Tsonkova O, Mateeva T. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Turkey [Internet]. Available from: http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_turkey_case_study.pdf
145.
Borowiak C. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics & Society. 2004 Dec 1;32(4):511–543.
146.
Borowiak C. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics and Society [Internet]. Los Altos: Geron-X Inc; 2004;32(4):511–543. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/0032329204269979
147.
Oguamanam C. Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends. Dalhousie Law Journal [Internet]. Halifax, N.S.: Dalhousie University Faculty of Law; 2006;29(2):413–454. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/dalholwj29&collection=journals&id=417
148.
Van Overwalle G. Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology [Internet]. Patent, Trademark, and Copyright Research Institute of the George Washington University: Washington, D.C.; 1998;39(2):143–149. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/idea39&collection=journals&id=153
149.
Patel R. Food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2009;36(3):663–706. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03066150903143079
150.
Patel R. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies [Internet]. London; 2009;36(3):663–706. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03066150903143079
151.
Rangnekar D. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 2014 May 4;19(3):359–383.
152.
Rangnekar D. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Carfax Publishing Company; 2014;19(3):359–383. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445
153.
de Schutter O. The right to food: Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation [Internet]. United Nations; 2009. Available from: http://www.srfood.org/images/stories/pdf/officialreports/20091021_report-ga64_seed-policies-and-the-right-to-food_en.pdf
154.
Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark, supported by the French Republic and the United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, supported by the Hellenic Republic, Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02 [Internet]. Court of Justice of the European Communities; 2005. Available from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62002CJ0465:EN:PDF
155.
Rangnekar D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 2011;43(9):2043–2059.
156.
Rangnekar D. Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning [Internet]. London: Pion; 2011;43(9):2043–2059. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1068/a43259
157.
Resource book on TRIPS and development [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
158.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
159.
Rangnekar D. Geographical indications: A review of proposals at the TRIPs Council – Extending article 23 to products other than wines and spirits [Internet]. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development; 2003. Available from: http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/06/cs_rangnekar.pdf
160.
Rangnekar D. The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of evidence from Europe [Internet]. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development; 2004. Available from: http://www.ictsd.org/sites/default/files/research/2008/07/a.pdf
161.
Yu PK. Intellectual property and information wealth: issues and practices in the digital age. Westport, Conn: Praeger Publishers; 2007.
162.
Rangnekar D. Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni [Internet]. 2009. Available from: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1564624
163.
Rangnekar D. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 13(2). Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/jwip.2010.13.issue-2/issuetoc
164.
Rangnekar D. The journal of world intellectual property. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 13(2).
165.
Correa CM. Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar; 2010.
166.
Broude T. Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Law School; 2005;26. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&div=24&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
167.
Broude T. Taking ‘trade and culture’ seriously: Geographical indications and cultural protection in WTO law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international law [Internet]. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Law School; 2005;26(4):623–692. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/upjiel26&collection=journals&id=639
168.
Coombe RJ. Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference. Law, Culture and the Humanities [Internet]. 2005;1(1):35–52. Available from: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1191/1743872105lw010oa
169.
Evans GE, Blakeney M. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of international economic law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006;9(3):575–614. Available from: http://0-jiel.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/9/3/575.full?sid=d1a978ba-7e6e-4c58-ad88-658de03bd846
170.
Evans GE, Blakeney M. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of International Economic Law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006;9(3):575–614. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/jiel/jgl016
171.
Rangnekar D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 2011;43(9):2043–2059.
172.
Rangnekar D. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and planning [Internet]. London: Pion; 2011;43(9):2043–2059. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1068/a43259
173.
Rangnekar D, Kumar S. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 2010 Mar;13(2):202–230.
174.
Rangnekar D, Kumar S. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property [Internet]. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 2010;13(2):202–230. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x
175.
Raustiala K, Munzer SR. The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications. European Journal of International Law [Internet]. 2007;18(2):337–365. Available from: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/ejil/chm016
176.
Sunder M. Invention of Traditional Knowledge, The. Law and Contemporary Problems [Internet]. Duke University; 2007;70. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp70&div=21&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
177.
Sunder M. The invention of traditional knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems [Internet]. Duke University; 2007;70(2):97–124. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp70&collection=journals&id=459
178.
Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Report of the Panel [Internet]. WTO Secretariat; 15AD. Available from: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds160_e.htm
179.
Resource book on TRIPS and development [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005. Available from: http://www.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=41624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
180.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
181.
Orit Fischman Afori. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law [Internet]. Martiusstr 150502 MunchenStreifbandzeitungB 14635H: IPR Verlag GmbH; 2013;392–417. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&src=ri&docguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7&hitguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014912deb619bca2ca01&spos=1&epos=1&td=3&refer=%2Fmaf%2Fwluk%2Fapp%2Fdocument%3Ftd%3D3%26spos%3D1%26rank%3D1%26suppsrguid%3Di0ad8289e0000014912deb619bca2ca01%26epos%3D1%26hitguid%3DIF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7%26docguid%3DI3548911003BC11E3BCC6ADB745F40E91%26resolvein%3Dtrue%26crumb-action%3Dappend%26context%3D10&crumb-action=append&context=17
182.
Afori OF. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law [Internet]. Weinheim/Bergstr: VCH Verlagsgesellschaft mbH [etc.]; 2013;44(4):392–417. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF22AC1A0003211E3B164951DE82E22A7
183.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems [Internet]. Duke University; 2003;66. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&div=6&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
184.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems [Internet]. 2003;66(1–2):33–74. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&collection=journals&id=39
185.
David J. Brennan. The three step test frenzy - why the TRIPs panel decision might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2002; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad8289e0000014912ee97a388f087e4&docguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&hitguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=20&spos=20&epos=20&td=26&crumb-action=append&context=30&resolvein=true
186.
Brennan DJ. The three steps test frenzy: why the TRIPs Panel might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2002;(2):212–225. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBDA3DA20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
187.
Chon M. Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education. UC Davis Law Review [Internet]. University of California, Davis School of Law; 2007;40(3):803–854. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/davlr40&collection=journals&id=811
188.
Philippa Davies. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. 100 Avenue RoadSwiss CottageLond4NW3 3PF: Sweet & Maxwell/ESC Publishing; 2013;402–414. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?access-method=toc&src=toce&docguid=I3A11BCA0D30E11E2B5068DA33E169237&crumb-action=append&context=66
189.
Davies P. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. Oxford: ESC Publishing Ltd; 2013;35(7):402–414. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A11BCA0D30E11E2B5068DA33E169237
190.
Helfer LR. World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. Boston University Law Review [Internet]. Boston University School of Law; 2000;80(1):93–204. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/bulr80&collection=journals&id=107
191.
Lange D. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems [Internet]. Duke University; 2003;66. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&div=17&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
192.
Lange D. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems [Internet]. 2003;66(1–2):463–483. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/lcp66&collection=journals&id=471
193.
Okediji R. TRIPs Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law Part II. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA [Internet]. New York: Copyright Society of the U.S.A.; 2001;49(2):585–648. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jocoso49&collection=journals&id=626
194.
Richard Owens. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2003;25. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?src=toce&docguid=IB75D1A00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&crumb-action=append&context=7
195.
Owens R. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European intellectual property review [Internet]. Oxford: ESC Publishing Ltd; 2003;25:49–54. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IB75D1A00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
196.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion of the Court [Internet]. United States Supreme Court; 2005. Available from: http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/pdf/04-480P.ZO
197.
Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion and individual judges’ opinions [Internet]. United States Supreme Court; 2005. Available from: https://w2.eff.org/IP/P2P/MGM_v_Grokster/04-480.pdf
198.
Thomas Hays. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2006; Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad69f8e0000014913177a772ecc76c2&docguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4&hitguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4&rank=3&spos=3&epos=3&td=15&crumb-action=append&context=22&resolvein=true
199.
Hays T. Secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. London: Sweet and Maxwell; 2007;29(1):15–21. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFD16C74083FB11DBB44ACB7302E2F64A
200.
Hays T. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Parts 1. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. Oxford: ESC Publishing Ltd; 2006;28(12):617–624. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I57624030737B11DBBF38943498D024C4
201.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain [Internet]. Law and contemporary problems. Duke University; 2003. p. 33–74. Available from: http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1273&context=lcp
202.
Boyle J. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems [Internet]. 2003;66(1):33–74. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20059171
203.
Lee A. Bygrave. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. 100 Avenue RoadSwiss CottageLond4NW3 3PF: Sweet & Maxwell/ESC Publishing; 2002;51–57. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&suppsrguid=i0ad69f8e000001491322b0afa5b789a0&docguid=ICF96B900E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838&hitguid=IB775AB10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=37&resolvein=true
204.
Bygrave LA. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review [Internet]. Oxford: ESC Publishing Ltd; 2002;24(2):51–57. Available from: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICF96B900E71211DA915EF37CAC72F838
205.
Helton M. Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems [Internet]. Columbia University School of Law; 2006;40(1):1–36. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/collsp40&collection=journals&id=13
206.
Lee, Edward. The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics [Internet]. Springer Netherlands; 2005;62(2):147–162. Available from: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/198095899?accountid=14888
207.
Lee E. The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics [Internet]. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company; 2005;62(2):147–162. Available from: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/198095899?accountid=14888
208.
Lunney GSJr. Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, The. Virginia Law Review [Internet]. Virginia Law Review Association; 2001;87. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr87&div=32&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
209.
Lunney GS. The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Virginia law review [Internet]. 2001;87(5):813–920. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/valr87&collection=journals&id=831
210.
Lerner J, Stern S, editors. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10 [Internet]. University of Chicago Press; 2010. Available from: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c11764.pdf
211.
Maskus KE. Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Vanderbilt Law Review [Internet]. Vanderbilt University Law School; 2000;53. Available from: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr53&div=69&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=clear
212.
Maskus KE. Lessons from studying the international economics of intellectual property rights. Vanderbilt law review [Internet]. Nashville: Vanderbilt University School of Law; 2000;53(6):2219–2239. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vanlr53&collection=journals&id=2247
213.
Yu PK. A Tale of Two Development Agendas. Ohio Northern University Law Review [Internet]. Ohio Northern University * Pettit College of Law; 2009;35(2):465–574. Available from: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/onulr35&collection=journals&id=469
214.
Alston P. Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly [Internet]. The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2005;27(3):755–829. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20069811
215.
de Beer J, editor. Implementing WIPO’s Development Agenda [Internet]. Wilfrid Laurier University Press; 2009. Available from: http://web.idrc.ca/openebooks/454-3/#page_24
216.
Amy Kapczynski. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. The Yale Law Journal [Internet]. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.; 2008;117(5):804–885. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20455812?origin=crossref
217.
Kapczynski A. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. Yale law journal [Internet]. The Yale Law Journal Company, Inc.; 2008;117(5):804–885. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/20455812
218.
Maskus KE, Penubarti M. How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics. 1995 Nov;39(3–4):227–248.
219.
Maskus KE, Penubarti M. How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property-Rights. Journal of international economics [Internet]. Pergamon Press; 1995;39(3–4):227–248. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8
220.
May C. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 2008 Jan;22(1):97–113.
221.
May C. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society [Internet]. Abingdon: Carfax; 2008;22(1):161–170. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/13600820701740753
222.
Menescal AK. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property [Internet]. 2005 Nov;8(6):761–796. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x/pdf
223.
Menescal AK. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property [Internet]. Geneva: Werner Publishing Company; 2005;8(6):761–796. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x/full
224.
Wade RH. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of International Political Economy. 2003 Nov;10(4):621–644.
225.
Wade RH. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of international political economy [Internet]. London: Routledge Journals; 2003;10(4):621–644. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/09692290310001601902
226.
Braithwaite J, Drahos P. Global business regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
227.
Helfer LR. Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law [Internet]. Yale Journal Co. Inc.; 2004;29(1):1–84. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/yjil29&collection=journals&id=11
228.
Abbott FM. Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law [Internet]. ICTSD; 2006. Available from: http://www.iprsonline.org/unctadictsd/dialogue/2006-05-03/Frederick%20abbott%2012%200405b.pdf
229.
Chimni BS. Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective. International Studies [Internet]. 1992;29(2):135–158. Available from: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/0020881792029002001
230.
Drahos P. Global Property Rights in Information: The story of TRIPS at the GATT. Prometheus [Internet]. 1995;13(1):6–19. Available from: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/08109029508629187
231.
Fischer-Lescano A, Teubner G. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law [Internet]. University of Michigan Law School; 2004;25(4):999–1046. Available from: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/mjil25&collection=journals&id=1013
232.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of International Economic Law. 2004;7(2):279–320.
233.
Maskus KE, Reichman JH. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of international economic law [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004;7(2):279–320. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
234.
Sell S, May C. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 2001 Jan;8(3):467–500.
235.
Sell S, May C. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy [Internet]. London: Routledge Journals; 2001;8(3):467–500. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/09692290110055849
