[1]
Abbott, F.M. 2006. Intellectual Property Provisions of Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements in Light of U.S. Federal Law. ICTSD.
[2]
Abbott, Frederick M. The international intellectual property system : commentary and materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.1.
[3]
Abbott, Frederick M. The international intellectual property system : commentary and materials / by Frederick Abbott, Thomas Cottier & Francis Gurry. Pt.2.
[4]
Afori, O.F. 2013. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 44, 4 (2013), 392–417.
[5]
Alston, P. 2005. Ships Passing in the Night: The Current State of the Human Rights and Development Debate Seen through the Lens of the Millennium Development Goals. Human Rights Quarterly. 27, 3 (2005), 755–829.
[6]
American Intellectual Property Law Association and William S. Hein & Company 1984. AIPLA quarterly journal. (1984).
[7]
Amy Kapczynski 2008. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. The Yale Law Journal. 117, 5 (2008), 804–885.
[8]
Anderfelt, U. 1971. International patent-legislation and developing countries. Martinus Nijhoff.
[9]
Aoki, K. and Luvai, K. 2007. Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex. Michigan State Law Review. 2007, (2007), 35–70.
[10]
Arup, C. 2000. The new World Trade Organization agreements: globalizing law through services and intellectual property. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Austin, G. and Helfer, L.R. 2011. Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
de Beer, J. ed. 2009. Implementing WIPO’s Development Agenda. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
[13]
Beier, F.-K. et al. 1996. From GATT to TRIPs: the agreement on trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights. VCH.
[14]
Bellmann, C. et al. 2003. Trading in knowledge: development perspectives on TRIPS, trade, and sustainability. Earthscan Publications.
[15]
Bertin, G.Y. and Wyatt, S. 1988. Multinationals and industrial property: the control of the world’s technology. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[16]
Blakeney, M. 1996. Trade related aspects of intellectual property rights: a concise guide to the TRIPS agreement. Sweet & Maxwell.
[17]
Boldrin, M. and Levine, D.K. 2008. Against Intellectual Monopoly. Cambridge University Press.
[18]
Boldrin, M. and Levine, D.K. 2008. Against intellectual monopoly. Cambridge University Press.
[19]
Borowiak, C. 2004. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics & Society. 32, 4 (Dec. 2004), 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979.
[20]
Borowiak, C. 2004. Farmers’ Rights: Intellectual Property Regimes and the Struggle over Seeds. Politics and Society. 32, 4 (2004), 511–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329204269979.
[21]
Boyle, J. 2003. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, (2003).
[22]
Boyle, J. 2003. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 66, 1–2 (2003), 33–74.
[23]
Boyle, J. 2003. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. Duke University.
[24]
Boyle, J. 2003. The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, 1 (2003), 33–74.
[25]
Braga, C.A.P. et al. 2000. Intellectual property rights and economic development. The World Bank.
[26]
Braithwaite, J. and Drahos, P. 2000. Global business regulation. Cambridge University Press.
[27]
Brennan, D.J. 2002. The three steps test frenzy: why the TRIPs Panel might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2 (2002), 212–225.
[28]
Broude, T. 2005. Taking Trade and Culture Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 26, (2005).
[29]
Broude, T. 2005. Taking ‘trade and culture’ seriously: Geographical indications and cultural protection in WTO law. University of Pennsylvania journal of international law. 26, 4 (2005), 623–692.
[30]
Bygrave, L.A. 2002. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review. 24, 2 (2002), 51–57.
[31]
Centre for Legal and Business Information and LexisNexis (Firm) Intellectual property newsletter.
[32]
Chang, H.-J. 2001. Intellectual property rights and economics development: historical lessons and emerging issues. Third World Network.
[33]
Charnovitz, S. 2002. The Legal Status of the Doha Declarations. Journal of International Economic Law. 5, 1 (Mar. 2002), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207.
[34]
Charnovitz, S. 2002. The legal status of the Doha declarations. Journal of international economic law. 5, 1 (2002), 207–211. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.1.207.
[35]
Chimni, B.S. 1992. Political Economy of the Uruguay Round of Negotiations: A Perspective. International Studies. 29, 2 (1992), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020881792029002001.
[36]
Chon, M. 2007. Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education. U.C. Davis Law Review. 40, 3 (2007), 803–854.
[37]
Coombe, R.J. 2005. Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 1, 1 (2005), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1191/1743872105lw010oa.
[38]
Coombe, R.J. 1998. The cultural life of intellectual properties: authorship, appropriation, and the law. Duke University Press.
[39]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2004. Intellectual property in the new millennium: essays in honour of William R. Cornish. Cambridge University Press.
[40]
Cornish, W.R. et al. 2013. Intellectual property: patents, copyright, trade marks and allied rights. Sweet & Maxwell, Thomson Reuters.
[41]
Correa, C.M. 2000. Intellectual property rights, the WTO and developing countries: the TRIPS agreement and policy options. Zed.
[42]
Correa, C.M. 2010. Research handbook on the interpretation and enforcement of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 2. Edward Elgar.
[43]
Correa, C.M. 2010. Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Edward Elgar.
[44]
Correa, C.M. 2010. Research handbook on the protection of intellectual property under WTO rules. Vol 1. Edward Elgar.
[45]
Correa, C.M. and Yusuf, A. 1998. Intellectual property and international trade: the TRIPs agreement. Kluwer Law International.
[46]
Cottier, T. and Mavroidis, P.C. 2003. Intellectual property: trade, competition, and sustainable development. University of Michigan Press.
[47]
D’Amato, A.A. and Long, D.E. 1997. International intellectual property law. Kluwer Law International.
[48]
David J. Brennan 2002. The three step test frenzy - why the TRIPs panel decision might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2002).
[49]
Davies, P. 2013. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. 35, 7 (2013), 402–414.
[50]
Dinwoodie, G.B. et al. 2001. International intellectual property law and policy. LexisNexis.
[51]
Drahos, P. 1996. A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth.
[52]
Drahos, P. 1995. Global Property Rights in Information: The story of TRIPS at the GATT. Prometheus. 13, 1 (1995), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029508629187.
[53]
Drahos, P. 1999. Intellectual property. Ashgate Dartmouth.
[54]
Drahos, P. and Braithwaite, J. 2002. Information feudalism: who owns the knowledge economy?. Earthscan.
[55]
Dreyfuss, R.C. et al. 2001. Expanding the boundaries of intellectual property: innovation policy for the knowledge society. Oxford University Press.
[56]
Duncan Matthews. 2006. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2006), 91–130.
[57]
Dutfield, G. 2009. Intellectual property rights and the life science industries: past, present and future. World Scientific.
[58]
Dutfield, G. and Suthersanen, U. 2008. Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar.
[59]
Dwijen Rangnekar 2006. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and Political Weekly. 41, 5 (2006), 409–417.
[60]
Edwin C. Hettinger 1989. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 18, 1 (1989), 31–52.
[61]
Evans, G.E. and Blakeney, M. 2006. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of international economic law. 9, 3 (2006), 575–614.
[62]
Evans, G.E. and Blakeney, M. 2006. The Protection of Geographical Indications After Doha: Quo Vadis? Journal of International Economic Law. 9, 3 (2006), 575–614.
[63]
Fawcett, J.J. and Torremans, P. 1998. Intellectual property and private international law. Clarendon.
[64]
Finger, J.M. and Schuler, P. 2004. Poor people’s knowledge: promoting intellectual property in developing countries. Copublication of the World Bank and Oxford University Press.
[65]
Fink, C. and Maskus, K.E. eds Intellectual property and development: lessons from recent economic research. World Bank.
[66]
Fischer-Lescano, A. and Teubner, G. 2004. Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 25, 4 (2004), 999–1046.
[67]
George Washington University et al. Idea.
[68]
Gervais, D.J. 2008. The TRIPS agreement: drafting history and analysis. Sweet & Maxwell/Thomson Reuters.
[69]
Goldstein, P. 2001. International intellectual property law: cases and materials. Foundation Press.
[70]
Goodin, R.E. et al. 2007. A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Blackwell Pub.
[71]
Gosseries, A. et al. 2008. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[72]
Gosseries, A. et al. 2008. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[73]
Gosseries, A. et al. 2008. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[74]
Gosseries, A. et al. 2008. Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan.
[75]
Great Britain 2002. Integrating intellectual property rights and development policy. CIPR.
[76]
Hays, T. 2007. Secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review. 29, 1 (2007), 15–21.
[77]
Hays, T. 2006. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Parts 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 12 (2006), 617–624.
[78]
Heath, C. and Kamperman Sanders, A. 2005. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. Hart Publishing.
[79]
Heath, C. and Kamperman Sanders, A. 2005. New frontiers of intellectual property law: IP and cultural heritage, geographical indicators, enforcement, overprotection. Hart Publishing.
[80]
Helfer, L.R. 2004. Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law. 29, 1 (2004), 1–84.
[81]
Helfer, L.R. 2000. World Music on a U.S. Stage: A Berne/Trips and Economic Analysis of the Fairness in Music Licensing Act. Boston University Law Review. 80, 1 (2000), 93–204.
[82]
Helfer, L.R. and Austin, G. 2011. Human rights and intellectual property: mapping the global interface. Cambridge University Press.
[83]
Helton, M. 2006. Secondary Liability for Copyright Infringement: BitTorrent as a Vehicle for Establishing a New Copyright Definition for Staple Articles of Commerce. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems. 40, 1 (2006), 1–36.
[84]
Hettinger, E.C. 1989. Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 18, 1 (1989), 31–52.
[85]
Howse, R. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 3, 4, 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x.
[86]
Howse, R. 2000. The Canadian Generic Medicines Panel. A Dangerous Precedent in Dangerous Times. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 3, 4 (2000), 493–507. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2000.tb00139.x.
[87]
Hughes, J. 1988. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal. 77, 2 (1988), 287–366.
[88]
Hughes, Justin 1988. The Philosophy of Intellectual Property. The Georgetown law journal. 77, (1988).
[89]
Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy: 2002. http://www.iprcommission.org/graphic/documents/final_report.htm.
[90]
Intellectual Property Institute 1997. Intellectual property quarterly. (1997).
[91]
Intellectual Property Institute Intellectual property quarterly.
[92]
Ivanov, I. et al. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Turkey.
[93]
Jakkrit Kuanpoth. 2006. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand - the ddI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. (2006), 149–158.
[94]
Kapczynski, A. 2008. The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. Yale law journal. 117, 5 (2008), 804–885.
[95]
Keith Aoki 2008. Seed Wars: Cases and Materials on Intellectual Property and Plant Genetic Resources. Carolina Academic Pr.
[96]
Kuanpoth, J. 2006. Patents and access to medicines in Thailand – the DDI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2 (2006), 149–158.
[97]
Landes, W.M. and Posner, R.A. 2003. The economic structure of intellectual property law. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
[98]
Lange, D. 2003. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, (2003).
[99]
Lange, D. 2003. Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and contemporary problems. 66, 1–2 (2003), 463–483.
[100]
Lee A. Bygrave. 2002. The technologisation of copyright: implications for privacy and related interests. European Intellectual Property Review. (2002), 51–57.
[101]
Lee, E. 2005. The Ethics of Innovation: P2P Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics. 62, 2 (2005), 147–162.
[102]
Lee, Edward 2005. The Ethics of Innovation: p2p Software Developers and Designing Substantial Noninfringing Uses Under the Sony Doctrine. Journal of Business Ethics. 62, 2 (2005), 147–162.
[103]
Lerner, J. and Stern, S. eds 2010. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 10. University of Chicago Press.
[104]
LexisNexis (Firm) 1978. Intellectual property decisions. (1978).
[105]
Lightbourne, M. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Ethiopia.
[106]
Lightbourne, M. and Dutfield, G. Literature Review and Commentary on Legal Regimes and Models for Protecting Plant Varieties.
[107]
Lightbourne, M. and Muraguri, L. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: China.
[108]
Lunney, G.S. 2001. The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Virginia law review. 87, 5 (2001), 813–920.
[109]
Lunney, G.S.Jr. 2001. Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, The. Virginia Law Review. 87, (2001).
[110]
Malbon, J. and Lawson, C. 2008. Interpreting and implementing the TRIPS agreement: is it fair?. Edward Elgar.
[111]
Maskus, K.E. 2000. Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Institute for International Economics.
[112]
Maskus, K.E. 2000. Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Vanderbilt Law Review. 53, (2000).
[113]
Maskus, K.E. 2000. Lessons from studying the international economics of intellectual property rights. Vanderbilt law review. 53, 6 (2000), 2219–2239.
[114]
Maskus, K.E. and Penubarti, M. 1995. How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics. 39, 3–4 (Nov. 1995), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
[115]
Maskus, K.E. and Penubarti, M. 1995. How Trade-Related Are Intellectual Property-Rights. Journal of international economics. 39, 3–4 (1995), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
[116]
Maskus, K.E. and Reichman, J.H. 2005. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge University Press.
[117]
Maskus, K.E. and Reichman, J.H. 2005. International public goods and transfer of technology under a globalized intellectual property regime. Cambridge University Press.
[118]
Maskus, K.E. and Reichman, J.H. 2004. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of International Economic Law. 7, 2 (2004), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279.
[119]
Maskus, K.E. and Reichman, J.H. 2004. The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods. Journal of international economic law. 7, 2 (2004), 279–320. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/7.2.279.
[120]
Matthews, D. 2006. From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 2 (2006), 91–130.
[121]
Matthews, D. 2002. Globalizing intellectual property rights: the TRIPs agreement. Routledge.
[122]
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht IIC: international review of industrial property and copyright law.
[123]
Max-Planck-Institut für Ausländisches und Internationales Patent-, Urheber- und Wettbewerbsrecht International review of industrial property and copyright law.
[124]
May, C. 2008. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 22, 1 (Jan. 2008), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
[125]
May, C. 2008. The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 22, 1 (2008), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
[126]
May, C. and Sell, S.K. 2006. Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Lynne Rienners Publishers.
[127]
May, C. and Sell, S.K. 2006. Intellectual property rights: a critical history. Lynne Rienners Publishers.
[128]
Mazzoleni, R. and Nelson, R.R. 1998. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues. 32, 4 (1998), 1031–1052. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506108.
[129]
Menescal, A.K. 2005. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 8, 6 (Nov. 2005), 761–796.
[130]
Menescal, A.K. 2005. Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 8, 6 (2005), 761–796.
[131]
Merges, R.P. et al. 2003. Intellectual property in the new technological age. Aspen Publishers.
[132]
Morin, J.-F. and Gold, E.R. 2010. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European Journal of International Relations. 16, 4 (Dec. 2010), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366054.
[133]
Morin, J.-F. and Gold, E.R. 2010. Consensus-seeking, distrust and rhetorical entrapment: The WTO decision on access to medicines. European journal of international relations. 16, 4 (2010), 563–587. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066110366054.
[134]
Novartis Ag vs Union Of India & Ors on 1 April, 2013: http://www.indiankanoon.org/doc/165776436/.
[135]
Nowak, K.J. 2005. Staying within the Negotiated Framework: Abiding by the Non-Discrimination Clause in Trips Article 27. Michigan Journal of International Law. 26, (2005).
[136]
Oguamanam, C. 2012. Intellectual property in global governance: a development question. Routledge.
[137]
Oguamanam, C. 2006. Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends. Dalhousie Law Journal. 29, 2 (2006), 413–454.
[138]
Okediji, R. 2001. TRIPs Dispute Settlement and the Sources of (International) Copyright Law Part II. Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 49, 2 (2001), 585–648.
[139]
Orit Fischman Afori. 2013. The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. (2013), 392–417.
[140]
Owens, R. 2003. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European intellectual property review. 25, (2003), 49–54.
[141]
Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. Journal of Peasant Studies. 36, 3 (2009), 663–706.
[142]
Patel, R. 2009. Food sovereignty. The Journal of Peasant Studies. 36, 3 (2009), 663–706.
[143]
Philippa Davies. 2013. Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. (2013), 402–414.
[144]
Pogge, T.W. 2005. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 36, 1–2 (Jan. 2005), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
[145]
Pogge, T.W. 2005. Human Rights and Global Health: A Research Programme. Metaphilosophy. 36, 1–2 (2005), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
[146]
Pugatch, M.P. 2004. The international political economy of intellectual property rights. Edward Elgar.
[147]
Rangnekar, D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: India.
[148]
Rangnekar, D. Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Kenya.
[149]
Rangnekar, D. 2007. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 10, 5 (Dec. 2007), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
[150]
Rangnekar, D. 2007. Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The journal of world intellectual property. 10, 5 (2007), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
[151]
Rangnekar, D. 2014. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 19, 3 (May 2014), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
[152]
Rangnekar, D. 2014. Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 19, 3 (2014), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
[153]
Rangnekar, D. 2003. Geographical indications: A review of proposals at the TRIPs Council – Extending article 23 to products other than wines and spirits. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.
[154]
Rangnekar, D. 2009. Geographical Indications and Localisation: A Case Study of Feni.
[155]
Rangnekar, D. 2006. No Pills for Poor People? Understanding the Disembowelment of India’s Patent Regime. Economic and political weekly. 41, 5 (2006), 409–417.
[156]
Rangnekar, D. 2011. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 43, 9 (2011), 2043–2059. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
[157]
Rangnekar, D. 2011. Remaking Place: The Social Construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning. 43, 9 (2011), 2043–2059. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
[158]
Rangnekar, D. 2011. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 43, 9 (2011), 2043–2059. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
[159]
Rangnekar, D. 2011. Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and planning. 43, 9 (2011), 2043–2059. https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
[160]
Rangnekar, D. Review of the Economic Literature on Plant Breeders’ Rights.
[161]
Rangnekar, D. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 2.
[162]
Rangnekar, D. The journal of world intellectual property. 13, 2.
[163]
Rangnekar, D. 2004. The socio-economics of geographical indications: A review of evidence from Europe. UNCTAD/ICTSD Capacity Building Project on Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development.
[164]
Rangnekar, D. 1013. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and political weekly. 48, 32 (1013), 39–40.
[165]
Rangnekar, D. 2013. The Supreme Court Judgment: Lawmaking in the South. Economic and Political Weekly. 48, 32 (2013), 39–40.
[166]
Rangnekar, D. and Kumar, S. 2010. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 2 (Mar. 2010), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x.
[167]
Rangnekar, D. and Kumar, S. 2010. Another Look at Basmati: Genericity and the Problems of a Transborder Geographical Indication. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13, 2 (2010), 202–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2009.00391.x.
[168]
Raustiala, K. and Munzer, S.R. 2007. The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications. European Journal of International Law. 18, 2 (2007), 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm016.
[169]
Reichman, J.H. 1995. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPS Component of the WTO Agreement. International Lawyer (ABA). 29, (1995).
[170]
Reichman, J.H. 1995. Universal Minimum Standards of Intellectual Property Protection under the TRIPs Component of the WTO Agreement. International lawyer. 29, 2 (1995), 345–388.
[171]
Research Project: Impacts of the Intellectual Property Rights Rules on Sustainable Development: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/csgr/research/projects/ipdev/.
[172]
Resnik, D.B. 2003. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 46, 4 (2003), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384.
[173]
Resnik, D.B. 2003. A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 46, 4 (2003), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025631902384.
[174]
Richard Owens 2003. TRIPs and the fairness in music arbitration: the repercussions. European Intellectual Property Review. 25, (2003).
[175]
Richards, D. 2004. Intellectual property rights and global capitalism: the political economy of the TRIPS Agreement. M.E. Sharpe.
[176]
Roberto Mazzoleni and Richard R. Nelson 1998. Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patents. Journal of Economic Issues. 32, 4 (1998), 1031–1052.
[177]
Ryan, M.P. 1998. Knowledge diplomacy: global competition and the politics of intellectual property. Brookings Institution Press.
[178]
Scherer, F.M. and Watal, J. 2002. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of International Economic Law. 5, 4 (Dec. 2002), 913–939. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
[179]
Scherer, F.M. and Watal, J. 2002. Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of international economic law. 5, 4 (2002), 913–939. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
[180]
de Schutter, O. 2009. The right to food: Seed policies and the right to food: enhancing agrobiodiversity and encouraging innovation. United Nations.
[181]
Sell, S. and May, C. 2001. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 8, 3 (Jan. 2001), 467–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110055849.
[182]
Sell, S. and May, C. 2001. Moments in law: contestation and settlement in the history of intellectual property. Review of International Political Economy. 8, 3 (2001), 467–500. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290110055849.
[183]
Sell, S.K. 1998. Power and ideas: North-South politics of intellectual property and antitrust. State University of New York Press.
[184]
Sell, S.K. and Prakash, A. 2004. Using ideas strategically: The contest between business and NGO networks in intellectual property rights. International studies quarterly. 48, 1 (2004), 143–175.
[185]
Sherwood, R.M. 1990. Intellectual property and economic development. Westview Press.
[186]
Sunder, M. 2007. Invention of Traditional Knowledge, The. Law and Contemporary Problems. 70, (2007).
[187]
Sunder, M. 2007. The invention of traditional knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems. 70, 2 (2007), 97–124.
[188]
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash 2004. Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 1 (2004), 143–175.
[189]
Tansey, G. and Rajotte, T. 2008. The future control of food: a guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, biodiversity and food security. Earthscan.
[190]
Thomas Hays 2006. The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. (2006).
[191]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[192]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[193]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[194]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[195]
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development and International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development 2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[196]
United States Trademark Association et al. The Trade-mark reporter.
[197]
University of Georgia et al. The journal of intellectual property law.
[198]
University of Texas at Austin et al. Texas intellectual property law journal.
[199]
Van Overwalle, G. 1998. Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology. 39, 2 (1998), 143–149.
[200]
Wade, R.H. 2003. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of International Political Economy. 10, 4 (Nov. 2003), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902.
[201]
Wade, R.H. 2003. What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of ‘development space’. Review of international political economy. 10, 4 (2003), 621–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290310001601902.
[202]
Wadlow, C. 1998. Enforcement of intellectual property in European and international law: the new private international law of intellectual property in the United Kingdom and the European Community. Sweet & Maxwell.
[203]
Wallerstein, M.B. et al. 1993. Global dimensions of intellectual property rights in science and technology. National Academy Press.
[204]
Watal, J. 2003. Intellectual property rights in the WTO and developing countries. Oxford University Press.
[205]
Weissman, R. 1996. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic. 17, 4 (1996), 1069–1125.
[206]
Weissman, Robert 1996. Long, Strange Trips: The Pharmaceutical Industry Drive to Harmonize Global Intellectual Property Rules, and the Remaining WTO Legal Alternatives Available to Third World Countries. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law. 17, (1996).
[207]
van Wijk, J. 2004. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management. 16, 1 (2004), 121–141.
[208]
van Wijk, J. 2004. Terminating piracy or legitimate seed saving? The use of copy-protection technology in seeds. Technology analysis & strategic management. 16, 1 (2004), 121–141.
[209]
WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use: http://www.wipo.int/about-ip/en/iprm/.
[210]
World Intellectual Property Organization 2004. WIPO intellectual property handbook: policy, law and use. WIPO.
[211]
World Trade Organisation 2000. WTO/DSP (2000) Canada – Patent Protection of Pharmaceutical Products – Report of the Panel.
[212]
Yu, P.K. 2009. A Tale of Two Development Agendas. Ohio Northern University Law Review. 35, 2 (2009), 465–574.
[213]
Yu, P.K. 2007. Intellectual property and information wealth: issues and practices in the digital age. Praeger Publishers.
[214]
Assessing the Economic Implications of Different Models for Implementing the Requirement to Protect Plant Varieties: Country case studies: Bulgaria.
[216]
European intellectual property review.
[217]
European intellectual property review.
[218]
2005. Federal Republic of Germany and Kingdom of Denmark, supported by the French Republic and the United Kingdom v Commission of the European Communities, supported by the Hellenic Republic, Joined Cases C-465/02 and C-466/02. Court of Justice of the European Communities.
[219]
Final Report- Impact of the IPR rules on Sustainable Development.
[220]
Intellectual Property and Information Technology Law.
[221]
1998. Journal of international economic law. (1998).
[222]
Journal of international economic law.
[223]
Managing intellectual property.
[224]
Managing intellectual property.
[225]
2005. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion and individual judges’ opinions. United States Supreme Court.
[226]
2005. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc v. Grokster. 545 US 913. Opinion of the Court. United States Supreme Court.
[228]
2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[229]
2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[230]
2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[231]
2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[232]
2005. Resource book on TRIPS and development. Cambridge University Press.
[233]
15 AD. Section 110(5) of the US Copyright Act, Report of the Panel. WTO Secretariat.
[234]
The Journal of world intellectual property.
[235]
The journal of world intellectual property.
