1.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell; 2005. https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
2.
Singer P. Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1986.
3.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
4.
LaFollette H. The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford University Press https://go.exlibris.link/RV7rDtbY
5.
Lantz G. Applied Ethics: What Kind of Ethics and What Kind of Ethicist? Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2000;17(1):21-28. doi:10.1111/1468-5930.00137
6.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell; 2005. https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
7.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
8.
Benatar D. Better Never to Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence. Clarendon Press; 2013. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664047
9.
David Benatar. Still Better Never to Have Been: A Reply to (More of) My Critics. The Journal of Ethics. 2013;17(1):121-151. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/42630950
10.
Elizabeth Harman. Reviewed Work: Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence by David Benatar. Noûs. 2009;43(4):776-785. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40660445
11.
Benatar D. To Be or Not to Have Been? International Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2001;15(2):255-266. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=02f32382-9cf4-e811-80cd-005056af4099
12.
Bradley B. Benatar and the Logic of Betterness. Journal of ethics & social philosophy. 2010;4(2). http://mail.jesp.org/articles/download/BenataronBetternessNote.pdf
13.
Len Doyal. Is Human Existence Worth Its Consequent Harm? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2007;33(10):573-576. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27719952
14.
Roberts MA, Wasserman DT. Harming Future Persons: Ethics, Genetics and the Nonidentity Problem. Vol v. 35. Springer; 2009. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2507751
15.
Roberts MA. Can it Ever Be Better Never to Have Existed At All? Person-Based Consequentialism and a New Repugnant Conclusion. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2003;20(2):159-185. doi:10.1111/1468-5930.00244
16.
Roberts MA. An Asymmetry in the Ethics of Procreation. Philosophy Compass. 2011;6(11):765-776. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00435.x
17.
Smilansky S. Morally, should we prefer never to have existed? Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2013;91(4):655-666. doi:10.1080/00048402.2013.775168
18.
Smuts A. To Be or Never to Have Been: Anti-Natalism and a Life Worth Living. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2014;17(4):711-729. doi:10.1007/s10677-013-9461-0
19.
Satz D. Why Some Things Should Not Be for Sale: The Moral Limits of Markets. Oxford University Press; 2010. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2629862
20.
Rippon S. Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market. Journal of Medical Ethics. 2014;40(3):145-150. doi:10.1136/medethics-2011-100318
21.
Markets without Symbolic Limits. Ethics. 2015;125:1053-1077. https://0-www-journals-uchicago-edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1086/680907
22.
Sandel MJ. What Money Can’t Buy: The Moral Limits of Markets. Allen Lane; 2012.
23.
Caney S. Markets, Morality and Climate Change: What, if Anything, is Wrong with Emissions Trading? New Political Economy. 2010;15(2):197-224. doi:10.1080/13563460903586202
24.
Freiman C. Vote Markets. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 2014;92(4):759-774. doi:10.1080/00048402.2014.892147
25.
Panitch V. Surrogate Tourism and Reproductive Rights. Hypatia. 2013;28(2):274-289. doi:10.1111/hypa.12005
26.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
27.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
28.
Pummer T. Whether and Where to Give. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2016;44(1):77-95. doi:10.1111/papa.12065
29.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell; 2005. https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
30.
Brian McElwee. Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2011;14(4):457-466. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41472612
31.
Unger P. Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence. Oxford University Press; 1996. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662628
32.
Wolf S. Moral Saints. The Journal of Philosophy. 1982;79(8). doi:10.2307/2026228
33.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3090093
34.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3090093
35.
Kagan S. What’s Wrong with Speciesism? (Society for Applied Philosophy Annual Lecture 2015). Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2016;33(1):1-21. doi:10.1111/japp.12164
36.
Michael Fox. ‘Animal Liberation’: A Critique. Ethics. 1978;88(2):106-118. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2379979
37.
LaFollette H. The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford University Press http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2665854
38.
Lomasky, Loren. IS IT WRONG TO EAT ANIMALS? Social Philosophy & Policy. 30(1-2):177-200. https://0-search-proquest-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1497161654/A6482670A892452BPQ/8?accountid=14888
39.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell; 2005. https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
40.
Peter Singer. Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1980;9(4):325-337. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265002
41.
Guerrero AA. Don’t Know, Don’t Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. Philosophical Studies. 2007;136(1):59-97. doi:10.1007/s11098-007-9143-7
42.
Campbell JK, O’Rourke M, Silverstein H, Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference. Action, Ethics, and Responsibility. MIT Press; 2010. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2948215
43.
Tooley M. An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing versus Letting Die. In: Killing and Letting Die. 2nd ed. Fordham University Press; 1994:103-111. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a32bc724-3b13-e911-80cd-005056af4099
44.
Shelly Kagan. The Additive Fallacy. Ethics. 1988;99(1):5-31. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2380927
45.
Woollard F. The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing I: Analysis of the Doing/Allowing Distinction. Philosophy Compass. 2012;7(7):448-458. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00491.x
46.
Woollard F. The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing II: The Moral Relevance of the Doing/Allowing Distinction. Philosophy Compass. 2012;7(7):459-469. doi:10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00492.x
47.
Bennett J. The Act Itself. Clarendon; 1995. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664823
48.
Steinbock B, Norcross A. Killing and Letting Die. 2nd ed. Fordham University Press; 1994.
49.
Kagan S. The Limits of Morality. Clarendon Press; 1989. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664863
50.
Harris J, ed. Bioethics. Oxford University Press; 2001.
51.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A Companion to Applied Ethics. Blackwell; 2005. https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
52.
Nagel T. Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press; 1979. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2790398
53.
Kagan S. Death. Yale University Press; 2012. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2966499
54.
Feldman F. Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death. The Philosophical Review. 1991;100(2). doi:10.2307/2185300
55.
Johansson J. Past and Future Non-Existence. The Journal of Ethics. 2013;17(1-2):51-64. doi:10.1007/s10892-012-9137-3
56.
SMUTS A. LESS GOOD BUT NOT BAD: IN DEFENSE OF EPICUREANISM ABOUT DEATH. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. 2012;93(2):197-227. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01423.x
57.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol 38. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SEthics%20in%20practice%20%3A%20an%20anthology%20Lafollette__Ff%3Afacetmediatype%3Ah%3Ah%3AE-Book%3A%3A__Orightresult__U__X0?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
58.
Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, and Judith Jarvis Thomson, et al. Amos Elon Murray Kempton Amy Knight Roderick MacFarquhar Lisa Appignanesi Ian Johnson Zia Haider Rahman Tom Vanderbilt Mark Greenberg. Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers’ Brief. The New York Review of Books. 1997;(March 27, 1997). http://0-www.nybooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/articles/1997/03/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/
59.
Kamm F. A Right to Choose Death. Boston Review. 1997;22. http://bostonreview.net/archives/BR22.3/Kamm.html
60.
Velleman JD. A Right of Self‐Termination? Ethics. 1999;109(3):606-628. doi:10.1086/233924
61.
Glover J. Causing Death and Saving Lives. Penguin; 1977.
62.
Singer P. Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1986.
63.
Kamm FM. Physician‐Assisted Suicide, the Doctrine of Double Effect, and the Ground of Value. Ethics. 1999;109(3):586-605. doi:10.1086/233923
64.
Shand J. A Reply to Some Standard Objections to Euthanasia. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 1997;14(1):43-47. doi:10.1111/1468-5930.00038
65.
Thomson JJ. Physician‐Assisted Suicide: Two Moral Arguments. Ethics. 1999;109(3):497-518. doi:10.1086/233919
66.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A Companion to Applied Ethics. [Paperback ed.]. Blackwell; 2005. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2830440
67.
Singer P. Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1986.
68.
Parfit D. Chapter X - Overpopulation and the Quality of Life. In: Applied Ethics. Oxford University Press; 1986:145-164. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0afb4592-9fed-e811-80cd-005056af4099
69.
Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press; 1986. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664869
70.
Parfit D. Can We Avoid the Repugnant Conclusion? Theoria. 2016;82(2):110-127. doi:10.1111/theo.12097
71.
Broome J. Should We Value Population?*. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2005;13(4):399-413. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00230.x
72.
Harris J, ed. Bioethics. Oxford University Press; 2001.
73.
Greaves H. Population axiology. Philosophy Compass. 2017;12(11). doi:10.1111/phc3.12442
74.
HARE RM. POSSIBLE PEOPLE. Bioethics. 1988;2(4):279-293. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00055.x
75.
Michael Huemer. In Defence of Repugnance. Mind. 2008;117(468):899-933. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20532700
76.
Review by: Jefferson McMahan. Review: Problems of Population Theory. Ethics. 1981;92(1):96-127. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2380707
77.
Tannsjo T. Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion. Utilitas. 2002;14(03):339-359. doi:10.1017/S0953820800003642
