1.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A companion to applied ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. Available from: https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
2.
Singer P. Applied ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.
3.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
4.
LaFollette H. The Oxford handbook of practical ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Available from: https://go.exlibris.link/RV7rDtbY
5.
Lantz G. Applied Ethics: What Kind of Ethics and What Kind of Ethicist? Journal of Applied Philosophy [Internet]. 2000 Jan;17(1):21–28. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1468-5930.00137/abstract
6.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A companion to applied ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. Available from: https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
7.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
8.
Benatar D. Better never to have been: the harm of coming into existence [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2013. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664047
9.
David Benatar. Still Better Never to Have Been: A Reply to (More of) My Critics. The Journal of Ethics [Internet]. Springer; 2013;17(1):121–151. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/42630950
10.
Elizabeth Harman. Reviewed Work: Better Never To Have Been: The Harm of Coming into Existence by David Benatar. Noûs [Internet]. Wiley; 2009;43(4):776–785. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40660445
11.
Benatar D. To Be or Not to Have Been? International Journal of Applied Philosophy [Internet]. 2001;15(2):255–266. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=02f32382-9cf4-e811-80cd-005056af4099
12.
Bradley B. Benatar and the Logic of Betterness. Journal of ethics & social philosophy [Internet]. 2010;4(2). Available from: http://mail.jesp.org/articles/download/BenataronBetternessNote.pdf
13.
Len Doyal. Is Human Existence Worth Its Consequent Harm? Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. BMJ; 2007;33(10):573–576. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27719952
14.
Roberts MA, Wasserman DT. Harming future persons: ethics, genetics and the nonidentity problem [Internet]. Dordrecht: Springer; 2009. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2507751
15.
Roberts MA. Can it Ever Be Better Never to Have Existed At All? Person-Based Consequentialism and a New Repugnant Conclusion. Journal of Applied Philosophy [Internet]. 2003 Oct;20(2):159–185. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1468-5930.00244/abstract
16.
Roberts MA. An Asymmetry in the Ethics of Procreation. Philosophy Compass [Internet]. 2011 Nov;6(11):765–776. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2011.00435.x/abstract
17.
Smilansky S. Morally, should we prefer never to have existed? Australasian Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2013 Dec;91(4):655–666. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00048402.2013.775168
18.
Smuts A. To Be or Never to Have Been: Anti-Natalism and a Life Worth Living. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice [Internet]. 2014 Aug;17(4):711–729. Available from: https://0-link-springer-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/article/10.1007%2Fs10677-013-9461-0
19.
Satz D. Why some things should not be for sale: the moral limits of markets [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2629862
20.
Rippon S. Imposing options on people in poverty: the harm of a live donor organ market. Journal of Medical Ethics [Internet]. 2014 Mar;40(3):145–150. Available from: https://0-search-proquest-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1781096050/abstract/EAB48131F6854E99PQ/3?accountid=14888
21.
Markets without Symbolic Limits. Ethics [Internet]. 2015;125:1053–1077. Available from: https://0-www-journals-uchicago-edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1086/680907
22.
Sandel MJ. What money can’t buy: the moral limits of markets. London: Allen Lane; 2012.
23.
Caney S. Markets, Morality and Climate Change: What, if Anything, is Wrong with Emissions Trading? New Political Economy [Internet]. 2010 Jun;15(2):197–224. Available from: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/13563460903586202
24.
Freiman C. Vote Markets. Australasian Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 2014 Oct 2;92(4):759–774. Available from: https://0-www-tandfonline-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/full/10.1080/00048402.2014.892147
25.
Panitch V. Surrogate Tourism and Reproductive Rights. Hypatia [Internet]. 2013 May;28(2):274–289. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/hypa.12005
26.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
27.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=7104082&query=Ethics+in+Practice+%3A+An+Anthology
28.
Pummer T. Whether and Where to Give. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. 2016 Dec;44(1):77–95. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/papa.12065
29.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A companion to applied ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. Available from: https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
30.
Brian McElwee. Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice [Internet]. Springer; 2011;14(4):457–466. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41472612
31.
Unger P. Living high and letting die: our illusion of innocence [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662628
32.
Wolf S. Moral Saints. The Journal of Philosophy [Internet]. 1982 Aug;79(8). Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2026228
33.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3090093
34.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3090093
35.
Kagan S. What’s Wrong with Speciesism? (Society for Applied Philosophy Annual Lecture 2015). Journal of Applied Philosophy [Internet]. 2016 Feb;33(1):1–21. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/japp.12164/full
36.
Michael Fox. ‘Animal Liberation’: A Critique. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1978;88(2):106–118. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2379979
37.
LaFollette H. The Oxford handbook of practical ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2665854
38.
Lomasky, Loren. IS IT WRONG TO EAT ANIMALS? Social Philosophy & Policy [Internet]. 30(1–2):177–200. Available from: https://0-search-proquest-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1497161654/A6482670A892452BPQ/8?accountid=14888
39.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A companion to applied ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. Available from: https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
40.
Peter Singer. Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism. Philosophy & Public Affairs [Internet]. Wiley; 1980;9(4):325–337. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265002
41.
Guerrero AA. Don’t Know, Don’t Kill: Moral Ignorance, Culpability, and Caution. Philosophical Studies [Internet]. 2007 Sep 10;136(1):59–97. Available from: https://0-link-springer-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/article/10.1007%2Fs11098-007-9143-7
42.
Campbell JK, O’Rourke M, Silverstein H, Inland Northwest Philosophy Conference. Action, ethics, and responsibility [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2010. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2948215
43.
Tooley M. An Irrelevant Consideration: Killing versus Letting Die. Killing and letting die [Internet]. 2nd ed. New York: Fordham University Press; 1994. p. 103–111. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a32bc724-3b13-e911-80cd-005056af4099
44.
Shelly Kagan. The Additive Fallacy. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1988;99(1):5–31. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2380927
45.
Woollard F. The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing I: Analysis of the Doing/Allowing Distinction. Philosophy Compass [Internet]. 2012 Jul;7(7):448–458. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00491.x/full
46.
Woollard F. The Doctrine of Doing and Allowing II: The Moral Relevance of the Doing/Allowing Distinction. Philosophy Compass [Internet]. 2012 Jul;7(7):459–469. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00492.x
47.
Bennett J. The act itself [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1995. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664823
48.
Steinbock B, Norcross A. Killing and letting die. 2nd ed. New York: Fordham University Press; 1994.
49.
Kagan S. The limits of morality [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1989. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664863
50.
Harris J, editor. Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
51.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A companion to applied ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Blackwell; 2005. Available from: https://go.exlibris.link/9lLqW0mJ
52.
Nagel T. Mortal questions [Internet]. [Cambridge]: Cambridge University Press; 1979. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2790398
53.
Kagan S. Death [Internet]. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2012. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2966499
54.
Feldman F. Some Puzzles About the Evil of Death. The Philosophical Review [Internet]. 1991 Apr;100(2). Available from: https://0-www-jstor-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2185300?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
55.
Johansson J. Past and Future Non-Existence. The Journal of Ethics [Internet]. 2013 Jun;17(1–2):51–64. Available from: https://0-search-proquest-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1357224661/abstract/9B1C8380367D47EEPQ/1?accountid=14888
56.
SMUTS A. LESS GOOD BUT NOT BAD: IN DEFENSE OF EPICUREANISM ABOUT DEATH. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly [Internet]. 2012 Jun;93(2):197–227. Available from: https://0-onlinelibrary-wiley-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01423.x
57.
LaFollette H. Ethics in practice: an anthology [Internet]. Fourth edition. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley Blackwell; 2014. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SEthics%20in%20practice%20%3A%20an%20anthology%20Lafollette__Ff%3Afacetmediatype%3Ah%3Ah%3AE-Book%3A%3A__Orightresult__U__X0?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
58.
Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, and Judith Jarvis Thomson, et al. Amos Elon Murray Kempton Amy Knight Roderick MacFarquhar Lisa Appignanesi Ian Johnson Zia Haider Rahman Tom Vanderbilt Mark Greenberg. Assisted Suicide: The Philosophers’ Brief. The New York Review of Books [Internet]. 1997;(March 27, 1997). Available from: http://0-www.nybooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/articles/1997/03/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/
59.
Kamm F. A Right to Choose Death. Boston Review [Internet]. 1997;22. Available from: http://bostonreview.net/archives/BR22.3/Kamm.html
60.
Velleman JD. A Right of Self‐Termination? Ethics [Internet]. 1999 Apr;109(3):606–628. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/233924
61.
Glover J. Causing death and saving lives. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1977.
62.
Singer P. Applied ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.
63.
Kamm FM. Physician‐Assisted Suicide, the Doctrine of Double Effect, and the Ground of Value. Ethics [Internet]. 1999 Apr;109(3):586–605. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/233923
64.
Shand J. A Reply to Some Standard Objections to Euthanasia. Journal of Applied Philosophy [Internet]. 1997 Apr;14(1):43–47. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1468-5930.00038/full
65.
Thomson JJ. Physician‐Assisted Suicide: Two Moral Arguments. Ethics [Internet]. 1999 Apr;109(3):497–518. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/233919
66.
Frey RG, Wellman CH. A companion to applied ethics [Internet]. [Paperback ed.]. Malden, MA: Blackwell; 2005. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2830440
67.
Singer P. Applied ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986.
68.
Parfit D. Chapter X - Overpopulation and the Quality of Life. Applied ethics [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 145–164. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=0afb4592-9fed-e811-80cd-005056af4099
69.
Parfit D. Reasons and persons [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1986. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664869
70.
Parfit D. Can We Avoid the Repugnant Conclusion? Theoria [Internet]. 2016 May;82(2):110–127. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/theo.12097/abstract
71.
Broome J. Should We Value Population?*. Journal of Political Philosophy [Internet]. 2005 Dec;13(4):399–413. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2005.00230.x/abstract
72.
Harris J, editor. Bioethics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001.
73.
Greaves H. Population axiology. Philosophy Compass [Internet]. 2017 Nov;12(11). Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/phc3.12442/abstract
74.
HARE RM. POSSIBLE PEOPLE. Bioethics [Internet]. 1988 Oct;2(4):279–293. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8519.1988.tb00055.x/full
75.
Michael Huemer. In Defence of Repugnance. Mind [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2008;117(468):899–933. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20532700
76.
Review by: Jefferson McMahan. Review: Problems of Population Theory. Ethics [Internet]. The University of Chicago Press; 1981;92(1):96–127. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2380707
77.
Tannsjo T. Why We Ought to Accept the Repugnant Conclusion. Utilitas [Internet]. 2002 Nov;14(03):339–359. Available from: https://0-www-cambridge-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/core/journals/utilitas/article/why-we-ought-to-accept-the-repugnant-conclusion/F60DB3A1B9CA4460650EA5DF9AA0540D
