[1]
S. M. Cahn, Aesthetics : a comprehensive anthology. Blackwell Publishers 2008.
[2]
P. Lamarque and S. H. Olsen, Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : the analytic tradition: an anthology, vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2004.
[3]
A. Neill and A. Ridley, Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2008.
[4]
M. Kieran, Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art, vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[5]
B. N. Gaut and D. Lopes, Eds., The Routledge companion to aesthetics, Third edition., vol. Routledge philosophy companions. London: Routledge, 2013.
[6]
J. Levinson, The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279456.001.0001
[7]
J. Levinson, The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[8]
P. Kivy, The Blackwell guide to aesthetics, vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470756645
[9]
P. Kivy, The Blackwell guide to aesthetics, vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
[10]
R. Stecker, Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : an introduction, 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2010.
[11]
S. Davies, The philosophy of art, vol. Foundations of the philosophy of the arts. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[12]
N. Carroll, Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction, vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/warwick/Doc?id=10054555
[13]
N. Carroll, Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction, vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge, 1999.
[14]
A. Danto, ‘Works of Art and Mere Real Things’, in The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1981, pp. 1–32 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f1a77ea0-5520-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[15]
A. C. Danto, ‘Extract’, in After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history, vol. The A.W. Mellon lectures in the fine arts, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dc68b7ef-5620-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[16]
H. M. Curtler, Ed., What is art?, vol. Art and philosophy. New York: Haven Publications, 1983.
[17]
M. Weitz, ‘The Role of Theory in Aesthetics’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 15, no. 1, Sep. 1956, doi: 10.2307/427491. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/427491
[18]
J. O. Urmson, ‘What Makes a Situation Aesthetic?’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 31, pp. 75–92, 1957 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4106645
[19]
R. Lind, ‘The Aesthetic Essence of Art’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 50, no. 2, Spring 1992, doi: 10.2307/430951. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/430951
[20]
M. Mandelbaum, ‘Family Resemblances and Generalization concerning the Arts’, American Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 219–228, 1965 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20009169
[21]
S. Davies, Definitions of art. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ph/ph346
[22]
T. Adajian, ‘The Definition of Art’, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/art-definition/
[23]
N. Carroll, Theories of art today. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press, 2000.
[24]
B. Gaut, ‘The Cluster Account of Art Defended’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 273–288, 2005, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayi032. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/aesthj/ayi032
[25]
R. Stecker, Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : an introduction, 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2010.
[26]
A. Danto, ‘The Artworld’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 61, no. 19, 1964, doi: 10.2307/2022937. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2022937
[27]
G. Dickie, Art and the aesthetic: an institutional analysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1974.
[28]
R. Wollheim, Art and its Objects, Second edition., vol. Cambridge Philosophy Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316286777
[29]
R. Wollheim, Art and its objects, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.
[30]
A. C. Danto, Beyond the brillo box: the visual arts in post-historical perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998.
[31]
International Wittgenstein Symposium, Aesthetics: proceedings of the 8th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Part 1, 15th to 21st August 1983, Kirchberg am Wechsel (Austria), vol. Schriftenreihe der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, 1984.
[32]
P. Kivy, The Blackwell guide to aesthetics, vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470756645
[33]
P. Kivy, The Blackwell guide to aesthetics, vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
[34]
R. Stecker, ‘The End of an Institutional Definition of Art’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 124–132, 1986 [Online]. Available: https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/oupjournalsaesthjaesthj_26_2pdf124pdf
[35]
S. Davies, The philosophy of art, vol. Foundations of the philosophy of the arts. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[36]
C. Abell, ‘Art: What it Is and Why it Matters’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 85, no. 3, pp. 671–691, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00498.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00498.x
[37]
A. Danto, ‘Aesthetics and the Work of Art’, in The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1981, pp. 90–114 [Online]. Available: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/Ph/Ph346
[38]
A. Danto, ‘Interpretation and Identification’, in The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1981, pp. 115–135 [Online]. Available: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/Ph/Ph346
[39]
A. C. Danto, The philosophical disenfranchisement of art, vol. Columbia classics in philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.
[40]
M. Rollins, Danto and his critics, 2nd ed., vol. Philosophers and their critics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781118253045
[41]
M. Rollins, Danto and His Critics, 2nd ed. Wiley 2012.
[42]
N. Zangwill, ‘Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art?’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 111–118, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1540-6245.00059. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1540-6245.00059/epdf
[43]
D. M. Lopes, ‘The Myth of (Non‐Aesthetic) Artistic Value’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 244, pp. 518–536, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.700.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-pq.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/61/244/518
[44]
A. Huddleston, ‘In Defense of Artistic Value’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 62, no. 249, pp. 705–714, Oct. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00089.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-pq.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/62/249/705
[45]
J. Shelley, ‘Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 707–720, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1080/00048400903207104. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/00048400903207104
[46]
J. Shelley, ‘The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 363–378, 2003, doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.363. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/43/4/363
[47]
M. Rollins, Danto and his critics, 2nd ed., vol. Philosophers and their critics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781118253045
[48]
M. Rollins, Danto and His Critics, 2nd ed. Wiley 2012.
[49]
D. Costello, ‘Kant and the Problem of Strong Non-Perceptual Art’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 277–298, Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayt015. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/53/3/277
[50]
D. Costello, ‘Whatever happened to "embodiment”? the eclipse of materiality in danto’s ontology of art’, Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 83–94, 14AD [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/09697250701755027
[51]
A. C. Danto, ‘Three Decades After the End of Art’, in After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history, vol. Bollingen series, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997, pp. 25–48 [Online]. Available: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/Ph/Ph346
[52]
A. C. Danto, After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history, vol. Bollingen series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1997.
[53]
A. Danto, ‘The End of Art’, in The philosophical disenfranchisement of art, vol. Columbia classics in philosophy, New York: Columbia University Press, 1986, pp. 81–115 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=377eced5-5520-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[54]
A. C. Danto, Encounters & reflections: art in the historical present. Berkley: University of California Press.
[55]
A. Haapala, J. Levinson, and V. Rantala, The end of art and beyond: essays after Danto. Amherst, N.Y: Humanity Books, 1999.
[56]
J. Margolis, What, after all, is a work of art?: lectures in the philosophy of art. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1999.
[57]
J. Gaiger, ‘Danto’s Philosophy’, Art History, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 451–454, Sep. 1999, doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00168. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1467-8365.00168/epdf
[58]
G. W. F. Hegel, B. Bosanquet, and M. J. Inwood, Introductory lectures on aesthetics. London: Penguin, 1993.
[59]
J. Levinson, ‘Defining art historically’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 232–250, 1979 [Online]. Available: https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/oupjournalsaesthjaesthj_19_3pdf232pdf
[60]
J. Levinson, ‘Refining Art Historically’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 47, no. 1, Winter 1989, doi: 10.2307/431990. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/431990
[61]
N. Carroll, Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction, vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/warwick/Doc?id=10054555
[62]
N. Carroll, Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction, vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge, 1999.
[63]
F. Sibley, ‘Aesthetic Concepts’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 68, no. 4, Oct. 1959, doi: 10.2307/2182490. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2182490
[64]
K. L. Walton, ‘Categories of Art’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 79, no. 3, Jul. 1970, doi: 10.2307/2183933. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2183933
[65]
B. Laetz, ‘Kendall Walton’s “Categories of Art”: A Critical Commentary’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 287–306, 2010, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayq017. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/50/3/287
[66]
D. Lopes, Beyond art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591558.001.0001
[67]
D. Lopes, Beyond art. Oxford University Press 2016.
[68]
D. O. Nathan, ‘Categories and Intentions’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 31, no. 4, Summer 1973, doi: 10.2307/429328. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/429328
[69]
J. Levinson, ‘What a Musical Work Is’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 77, no. 1, Jan. 1980, doi: 10.2307/2025596. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2025596
[70]
G. Currie, Ontology of Art. Palgrave Macmillan 1989.
[71]
N. Carroll, On criticism, vol. Thinking in action. New York: Routledge, 2009.
[72]
S. Davies, Definitions of art. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1991.
[73]
R. Hopkins, ‘Aesthetics, Experience, and Discrimination’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 119–133, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00189.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3700466
[74]
A. Carlson, ‘Nature, Aesthetic Judgment, and Objectivity’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 40, no. 1, Autumn 1981, doi: 10.2307/430349. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/430349
[75]
G. Parsons, ‘Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 279–295, 2002, doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.3.279. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/42/3/279
[76]
N. Zangwill, ‘In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 50, no. 201, pp. 476–493, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1111/1467-9213.00201. [Online]. Available: http://0-pq.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/50/201/476
[77]
G. Parsons, ‘Moderate Formalism As a Theory of the Aesthetic’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 38, no. 3, Autumn 2004, doi: 10.2307/3527441. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3527441
[78]
W. K. Wimsatt, The verbal icon: studies in the meaning of poetry. London: Methuen, 1970.
[79]
W. K. Wimsatt and M. C. Beardsley, The verbal icon: studies in the meaning of poetry. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 1954.
[80]
A. Nehamas, ‘The Postulated Author: Critical Monism as a Regulative Ideal’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 133–149, 1981 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343210
[81]
M. C. Beardsley, ‘Intentions and Interpretations: A Fallacy Revived’, in The aesthetic point of view: selected essays, Ithaca, (N.Y.): Cornell University Press, 1982, pp. 188–207 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f449d609-5620-e711-80c9-005056af4099
[82]
N. Carroll, Beyond aesthetics: philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511605970
[83]
N. Carroll, Beyond aesthetics: philosophical essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[84]
S. Davies, ‘Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 223–247, 2006, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayl001. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/46/3/223
[85]
J. Levinson, The pleasures of aesthetics: philosophical essays. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.
[86]
R. Stecker and S. Davies, ‘The Hypothetical Intentionalist’s Dilemma: A Reply to Levinson’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 307–312, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayq022. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/50/3/307
[87]
P. Livingston, Art and intention: a philosophical study. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199278067.001.0001
[88]
P. Livingston, Art and intention: a philosophical study. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005.
[89]
H. Maes, ‘Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 121–138, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayp051. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/50/2/121
[90]
G. Hagberg and W. Jost, A companion to the philosophy of literature, vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781444315608
[91]
G. Hagberg and W. Jost, A companion to the philosophy of literature, vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[92]
G. Iseminger, ‘Actual Intentionalism vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 54, no. 4, 1996, doi: 10.2307/431914. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/431914
[93]
R. Stecker, ‘Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 429–438, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00221.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4622188
[94]
R. Stecker, Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : an introduction, 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2010.
[95]
G. Iseminger, Intention and interpretation, vol. The Arts and their philosophies. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1992.
[96]
J. M. Robinson, ‘Style and Personality in the Literary Work’, The Philosophical Review, vol. 94, no. 2, Apr. 1985, doi: 10.2307/2185429. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2185429
[97]
N. Riggle, ‘Personal Style and Artistic Style’, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 65, no. 261, pp. 711–731, 2015, doi: 10.1093/pq/pqv026. [Online]. Available: http://0-pq.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/65/261/711
[98]
N. Riggle, ‘On the Aesthetic Ideal’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 433–447, Oct. 2015, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayv026. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/55/4/433
[99]
N. Riggle and R. Hopkins, ‘Artistic Style as the Expression of Ideals’.
[100]
J. Robinson, Deeper than reason: emotion and its role in literature, music, and art. Oxford: Clarendon, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199263655.001.0001
[101]
J. Robinson, Deeper than reason: emotion and its role in literature, music, and art. Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press, 2005.
[102]
J. L. Bermúdez and S. Gardner, Art and morality, vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge, 2003.
[103]
B. Lang, The concept of style, Rev. and Expanded ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1987.
[104]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888
[105]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection, 1st paperback edition., vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[106]
J. Levinson, The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279456.001.0001
[107]
J. Levinson, The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[108]
J. Gilmore, The life of a style: beginnings and endings in the narrative history of art. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
[109]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection, 1st paperback edition., vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
[110]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888
[111]
J. L. Bermúdez and S. Gardner, Art and morality, vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge, 2003.
[112]
A. W. Eaton, ‘Robust Immoralism’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 281–292, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01520.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01520.x/full
[113]
B. N. Gaut, Art, emotion and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263219.001.0001
[114]
B. N. Gaut, Art, emotion and ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[115]
D. Jacobson, ‘In Praise of Immoral Art’, Philosophical Topics, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 155–199, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/43154253
[116]
M. Kieran, Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art, vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[117]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888
[118]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection, 1st paperback edition., vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[119]
N. Carroll, ‘Moderate Moralism’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 223–238, Jul. 1996, doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.223. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/36/3/223
[120]
J. C. Anderson and J. T. Dean, ‘Moderate Autonomism’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 150–166, 1998, doi: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.2.150. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/38/2/150
[121]
P. Goldie, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion, vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.001.0001
[122]
P. Goldie, The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion, vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[123]
M. Kieran, ‘Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value’, Philosophy Compass, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 129–143, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00019.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00019.x/full
[124]
B. N. Gaut and D. Lopes, Eds., The Routledge companion to aesthetics, Third edition., vol. Routledge philosophy companions. London: Routledge, 2013.
[125]
N. Carroll, ‘Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research’, Ethics, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 350–387, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1086/233273. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.journals.uchicago.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1086/233273
[126]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection, vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888
[127]
J. Levinson, Ed., Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection, 1st paperback edition., vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
[128]
G. Hagberg and W. Jost, A companion to the philosophy of literature, vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781444315592
[129]
G. Hagberg and W. Jost, A companion to the philosophy of literature, vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[130]
M. Kieran, Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art, vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[131]
M. Kieran, ‘Art, Imagination, and the Cultivation of Morals’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 54, no. 4, Autumn 1996, doi: 10.2307/431916. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/431916
[132]
M. Kieran, Revealing art. London: Routledge, 2005.
[133]
E. Schellekens, Aesthetics and morality, vol. Continuum aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://site.ebrary.com/lib/warwick/Doc?id=10403750
[134]
E. Schellekens, Aesthetics and morality, vol. Continuum aesthetics. London: Continuum, 2007.
[135]
A. Neill and A. Ridley, Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2008.
[136]
A. Neill and A. Ridley, Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates, 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2008.
[137]
D. Dutton, The art instinct: beauty, pleasure, & human evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[138]
‘The journal of aesthetics and art criticism’, vol. 65, no. 1, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6245
[139]
D. Lopes, Beyond art. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591558.001.0001
[140]
D. Lopes, Beyond art. Oxford University Press 2016.
[141]
A. Shusterman, Richard; Tomlin, Aesthetic Experience, vol. 10. New York, USA: Routledge, 2007.
[142]
T. McEvilley, Art & otherness : crisis in cultural identity. McPherson & Company 1995.
[143]
E. Dissanayake, What is art for? Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1988.
[144]
J. Dewey, Art as experience, Trade pbk. ed. New York: Perigee Books, 2005.
[145]
Y. Saito, Everyday aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278350.001.0001
[146]
K. M. Higgins, ‘An Alchemy of Emotion: Rasa and Aesthetic Breakthroughs’, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 43–54, Jan. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00236.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00236.x/full
[147]
D. Davies, ‘On the Very Idea of “Outsider Art”’, The British Journal of Aesthetics, vol. 49, no. 1, pp. 25–41, 2009, doi: 10.1093/aesthj/ayn056. [Online]. Available: http://0-bjaesthetics.oxfordjournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/49/1/25
