Abell, Catharine. 2012. ‘Art: What It Is and Why It Matters’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85 (3): 671–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00498.x.
Adajian, Thomas. 2007. ‘The Definition of Art’. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/art-definition/.
Anderson, J. C., and J. T. Dean. 1998. ‘Moderate Autonomism’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 38 (2): 150–66. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.2.150.
Beardsley, M.C. 1982. ‘Intentions and Interpretations: A Fallacy Revived’. In The Aesthetic Point of View: Selected Essays, 188–207. Ithaca, (N.Y.): Cornell University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f449d609-5620-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Bermúdez, José Luis, and Sebastian Gardner. 2003a. Art and Morality. Vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge.
———. 2003b. Art and Morality. Vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge.
Cahn, Steven M. n.d. Aesthetics : A Comprehensive Anthology. Blackwell Publishers 2008.
Carlson, Allen. 1981. ‘Nature, Aesthetic Judgment, and Objectivity’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 40 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/430349.
Carroll, N. 1996. ‘Moderate Moralism’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3): 223–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.223.
Carroll, Noël. 1999a. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Electronic resource. Vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/warwick/Doc?id=10054555.
———. 1999b. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge.
———. 1999c. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Electronic resource. Vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/warwick/Doc?id=10054555.
———. 1999d. Philosophy of Art: A Contemporary Introduction. Vol. Routledge contemporary introductions to philosophy. London: Routledge.
———. 2000a. Theories of Art Today. Madison, Wis: University of Wisconsin Press.
———. 2000b. ‘Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research’. Ethics 110 (2): 350–87. https://doi.org/10.1086/233273.
———. 2001a. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511605970.
———. 2001b. Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2009. On Criticism. Vol. Thinking in action. New York: Routledge.
Costello, D. 2013. ‘Kant and the Problem of Strong Non-Perceptual Art’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 53 (3): 277–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayt015.
Costello, Diarmuid. 14AD. ‘Whatever Happened to "embodiment”? The Eclipse of Materiality in Danto’s Ontology of Art’. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities 12 (2): 83–94. http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/09697250701755027.
Currie, Gregory. n.d. Ontology of Art. Palgrave Macmillan 1989.
Curtler, Hugh Mercer, ed. 1983. What Is Art? Vol. Art and philosophy. New York: Haven Publications.
Danto, A. 1981a. ‘Aesthetics and the Work of Art’. In The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art, 90–114. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/Ph/Ph346.
———. 1981b. ‘Interpretation and Identification’. In The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art, 115–35. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/Ph/Ph346.
Danto, A. 1981. ‘Works of Art and Mere Real Things’. In The Transfiguration of the Commonplace: A Philosophy of Art, 1–32. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f1a77ea0-5520-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Danto, A C. 1997. ‘Extract’. In After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Vol. The A.W. Mellon lectures in the fine arts. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dc68b7ef-5620-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Danto, Arthur. 1964. ‘The Artworld’. The Journal of Philosophy 61 (19). https://doi.org/10.2307/2022937.
———. 1986. ‘The End of Art’. In The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art, Columbia classics in philosophy:81–115. New York: Columbia University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=377eced5-5520-e711-80c9-005056af4099.
Danto, Arthur C. 1997a. After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History. Vol. Bollingen series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
———. 1997b. ‘Three Decades After the End of Art’. In After the End of Art: Contemporary Art and the Pale of History, Bollingen series:25–48. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/Ph/Ph346.
———. 1998. Beyond the Brillo Box: The Visual Arts in Post-Historical Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 2005. The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art. Vol. Columbia classics in philosophy. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. n.d. Encounters & Reflections: Art in the Historical Present. Berkley: University of California Press.
Davies, D. 2009. ‘On the Very Idea of “Outsider Art”’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 49 (1): 25–41. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn056.
Davies, S. 2006. ‘Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (3): 223–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayl001.
Davies, Stephen. 1991a. Definitions of Art. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ph/ph346.
———. 1991b. Definitions of Art. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
———. 2006a. The Philosophy of Art. Vol. Foundations of the philosophy of the arts. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 2006b. The Philosophy of Art. Vol. Foundations of the philosophy of the arts. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
Dewey, John. 2005. Art as Experience. Trade pbk. ed. New York: Perigee Books.
Dickie, George. 1974. Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Dissanayake, Ellen. 1988. What Is Art For? Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Dutton, Denis. 2009. The Art Instinct: Beauty, Pleasure, & Human Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Eaton, A. W. 2012. ‘Robust Immoralism’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 70 (3): 281–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01520.x.
Gaiger, Jason. 1999. ‘Danto’s Philosophy’. Art History 22 (3): 451–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.00168.
Gaut, B. 2005. ‘The Cluster Account of Art Defended’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3): 273–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayi032.
Gaut, Berys Nigel. 2007. Art, Emotion and Ethics. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199263219.001.0001.
———. 2009. Art, Emotion and Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gaut, Berys Nigel, and Dominic Lopes, eds. 2013a. The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Third edition. Vol. Routledge philosophy companions. London: Routledge.
———, eds. 2013b. The Routledge Companion to Aesthetics. Third edition. Vol. Routledge philosophy companions. London: Routledge.
Gilmore, Jonathan. n.d. The Life of a Style: Beginnings and Endings in the Narrative History of Art. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Goldie, Peter. 2010a. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. Electronic resource. Vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199235018.001.0001.
———. 2010b. The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Emotion. Vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haapala, Arto, Jerrold Levinson, and Veikko Rantala. 1999. The End of Art and beyond: Essays after Danto. Amherst, N.Y: Humanity Books.
Hagberg, Garry, and Walter Jost. 2010a. A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Electronic resource. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781444315608.
———. 2010b. A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
———. 2010c. A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781444315592.
———. 2010d. A Companion to the Philosophy of Literature. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Bernard Bosanquet, and M. J. Inwood. 1993. Introductory Lectures on Aesthetics. London: Penguin.
Higgins, Kathleen Marie. 2007. ‘An Alchemy of Emotion: Rasa and Aesthetic Breakthroughs’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (1): 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00236.x.
Hopkins, Robert. 2005. ‘Aesthetics, Experience, and Discrimination’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 63 (2): 119–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00189.x.
Huddleston, Andrew. 2012. ‘In Defense of Artistic Value’. The Philosophical Quarterly 62 (249): 705–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00089.x.
International Wittgenstein Symposium. 1984. Aesthetics: Proceedings of the 8th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Part 1, 15th to 21st August 1983, Kirchberg Am Wechsel (Austria). Edited by Rudolf Haller. Vol. Schriftenreihe der Wittgenstein-Gesellschaft. Wien: Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
Iseminger, Gary. 1992. Intention and Interpretation. Vol. The Arts and their philosophies. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
———. 1996. ‘Actual Intentionalism vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/431914.
Jacobson, Daniel. 1997. ‘In Praise of Immoral Art’. Philosophical Topics 25 (1): 155–99. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/43154253.
Kieran, Matthew. 1996. ‘Art, Imagination, and the Cultivation of Morals’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 54 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/431916.
———. 2005. Revealing Art. London: Routledge.
———. 2006a. Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 2006b. Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 2006c. Contemporary Debates in Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art. Vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
———. 2006d. ‘Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value’. Philosophy Compass 1 (2): 129–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00019.x.
Kivy, Peter. 2004a. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470756645.
———. 2004b. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
———. 2004c. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470756645.
———. 2004d. The Blackwell Guide to Aesthetics. Vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Laetz, B. 2010. ‘Kendall Walton’s “Categories of Art”: A Critical Commentary’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3): 287–306. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq017.
Lamarque, Peter, and Stein Haugom Olsen. 2004. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art : The Analytic Tradition: An Anthology. Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell.
Lang, Berel. 1987. The Concept of Style. Rev. and Expanded ed. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Levinson, Jerrold. 1979. ‘Defining Art Historically’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3): 232–50. https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/oupjournalsaesthjaesthj_19_3pdf232pdf.
———. 1980. ‘What a Musical Work Is’. The Journal of Philosophy 77 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/2025596.
———. 1989. ‘Refining Art Historically’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/431990.
———. 1996. The Pleasures of Aesthetics: Philosophical Essays. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
———, ed. 1998a. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888.
———, ed. 1998b. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. 1st paperback edition. Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
———, ed. 1998c. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888.
———, ed. 1998d. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888.
———, ed. 1998e. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Vol. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and the Arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511663888.
———, ed. 2001a. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. 1st paperback edition. Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
———, ed. 2001b. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. 1st paperback edition. Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
———, ed. 2001c. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. 1st paperback edition. Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2005a. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279456.001.0001.
———. 2005b. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2005c. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199279456.001.0001.
———. 2005d. The Oxford Handbook of Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lind, Richard. 1992. ‘The Aesthetic Essence of Art’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 50 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/430951.
Livingston, Paisley. 2005a. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Electronic resource. Oxford: Clarendon. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199278067.001.0001.
———. 2005b. Art and Intention: A Philosophical Study. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Lopes, Dominic. 2014a. Beyond Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591558.001.0001.
———. 2014b. Beyond Art. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199591558.001.0001.
———. n.d. Beyond Art. Oxford University Press 2016.
———. n.d. Beyond Art. Oxford University Press 2016.
Lopes, Dominic McIver. 2011. ‘The Myth of (Non‐Aesthetic) Artistic Value’. The Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244): 518–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.700.x.
Maes, H. 2010. ‘Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2): 121–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp051.
Mandelbaum, Maurice. 1965. ‘Family Resemblances and Generalization Concerning the Arts’. American Philosophical Quarterly 2 (3): 219–28. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20009169.
Margolis, Joseph. 1999. What, after All, Is a Work of Art?: Lectures in the Philosophy of Art. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
McEvilley, Thomas. n.d. Art & Otherness : Crisis in Cultural Identity. McPherson & Company 1995.
Nathan, Daniel O. 1973. ‘Categories and Intentions’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 31 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/429328.
Nehamas, Alexander. 1981. ‘The Postulated Author: Critical Monism as a Regulative Ideal’. Critical Inquiry 8 (1): 133–49. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343210.
Neill, Alex, and Aaron Ridley. 2008a. Arguing about Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
———. 2008b. Arguing about Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
———. 2008c. Arguing about Art: Contemporary Philosophical Debates. 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
Parsons, G. 2002. ‘Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 42 (3): 279–95. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.3.279.
Parsons, Glenn. 2004. ‘Moderate Formalism As a Theory of the Aesthetic’. Journal of Aesthetic Education 38 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/3527441.
Riggle, Nick. 2015a. ‘Personal Style and Artistic Style’. The Philosophical Quarterly 65 (261): 711–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv026.
———. 2015b. ‘On the Aesthetic Ideal’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 55 (4): 433–47. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayv026.
Riggle, Nick, and Rob Hopkins. n.d. ‘Artistic Style as the Expression of Ideals’.
Robinson, Jenefer. 2005a. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Electronic resource. Oxford: Clarendon. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199263655.001.0001.
———. 2005b. Deeper than Reason: Emotion and Its Role in Literature, Music, and Art. Oxford: Clarendon/Oxford University Press.
Robinson, Jenefer M. 1985. ‘Style and Personality in the Literary Work’. The Philosophical Review 94 (2). https://doi.org/10.2307/2185429.
Rollins, Mark. 2012a. Danto and His Critics. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Vol. Philosophers and their critics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781118253045.
———. 2012b. Danto and His Critics. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Vol. Philosophers and their critics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781118253045.
———. n.d. Danto and His Critics. 2nd ed. Wiley 2012.
———. n.d. Danto and His Critics. 2nd ed. Wiley 2012.
Saito, Yuriko. 2007. Everyday Aesthetics. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278350.001.0001.
Schellekens, Elisabeth. 2007a. Aesthetics and Morality. Electronic resource. Vol. Continuum aesthetics. London: Continuum. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/warwick/Doc?id=10403750.
———. 2007b. Aesthetics and Morality. Vol. Continuum aesthetics. London: Continuum.
Shelley, J. 2003. ‘The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4): 363–78. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.363.
Shelley, James. 2010. ‘Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (4): 707–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903207104.
Shusterman, Richard; Tomlin, Adele. 2007. Aesthetic Experience. Vol. 10. New York, USA: Routledge.
Sibley, Frank. 1959. ‘Aesthetic Concepts’. The Philosophical Review 68 (4). https://doi.org/10.2307/2182490.
Stecker, R., and S. Davies. 2010. ‘The Hypothetical Intentionalist’s Dilemma: A Reply to Levinson’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (3): 307–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq022.
Stecker, Rober. n.d. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art : An Introduction. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2010.
———. n.d. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art : An Introduction. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2010.
———. n.d. Aesthetics and the Philosophy of Art : An Introduction. 2nd ed. Rowman & Littlefield Inc. 2010.
Stecker, Robert. 1986. ‘The End of an Institutional Definition of Art’. The British Journal of Aesthetics 26 (2): 124–32. https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/oupjournalsaesthjaesthj_26_2pdf124pdf.
———. 2006. ‘Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended’. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 64 (4): 429–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00221.x.
‘The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism’. 2007 65 (1). http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1540-6245.
Urmson, J. O. 1957. ‘What Makes a Situation Aesthetic?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 31: 75–92. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4106645.
Walton, Kendall L. 1970. ‘Categories of Art’. The Philosophical Review 79 (3). https://doi.org/10.2307/2183933.
Weitz, Morris. 1956. ‘The Role of Theory in Aesthetics’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 15 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/427491.
Wimsatt, William K. 1970. The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. London: Methuen.
Wimsatt, William K., and Monroe C. Beardsley. 1954. The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky.
Wollheim, Richard. 1980. Art and Its Objects. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2015. Art and Its Objects. Second edition. Vol. Cambridge Philosophy Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781316286777.
Zangwill, Nick. 2000. ‘In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism’. The Philosophical Quarterly 50 (201): 476–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00201.
———. 2002. ‘Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art?’ Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2): 111–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6245.00059.
