[1]
Abell, C. 2012. Art: What it Is and Why it Matters. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 85, 3 (2012), 671–691. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1933-1592.2011.00498.x.
[2]
Adajian, T. 2007. The Definition of Art. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2007).
[3]
Anderson, J.C. and Dean, J.T. 1998. Moderate Autonomism. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 38, 2 (1998), 150–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/38.2.150.
[4]
Beardsley, M.C. 1982. Intentions and Interpretations: A Fallacy Revived. The aesthetic point of view: selected essays. Cornell University Press. 188–207.
[5]
Bermúdez, J.L. and Gardner, S. 2003. Art and morality. Routledge.
[6]
Bermúdez, J.L. and Gardner, S. 2003. Art and morality. Routledge.
[7]
Cahn, S.M. Aesthetics : a comprehensive anthology.
[8]
Carlson, A. 1981. Nature, Aesthetic Judgment, and Objectivity. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 40, 1 (Autumn 1981). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/430349.
[9]
Carroll, N. 2000. Art and Ethical Criticism: An Overview of Recent Directions of Research. Ethics. 110, 2 (Jan. 2000), 350–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1086/233273.
[10]
Carroll, N. 2001. Beyond aesthetics: philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Carroll, N. 2001. Beyond aesthetics: philosophical essays. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Carroll, N. 1996. Moderate Moralism. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 36, 3 (Jul. 1996), 223–238. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/36.3.223.
[13]
Carroll, N. 2009. On criticism. Routledge.
[14]
Carroll, N. 1999. Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction. Routledge.
[15]
Carroll, N. 1999. Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction. Routledge.
[16]
Carroll, N. 1999. Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction. Routledge.
[17]
Carroll, N. 1999. Philosophy of art: a contemporary introduction. Routledge.
[18]
Carroll, N. 2000. Theories of art today. University of Wisconsin Press.
[19]
Costello, D. 2013. Kant and the Problem of Strong Non-Perceptual Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 53, 3 (Jul. 2013), 277–298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayt015.
[20]
Costello, D. 14AD. Whatever happened to "embodiment”? the eclipse of materiality in danto’s ontology of art. Angelaki: Journal of Theoretical Humanities. 12, 2 (14AD), 83–94.
[21]
Currie, G. Ontology of Art.
[22]
Curtler, H.M. ed. 1983. What is art?. Haven Publications.
[23]
Danto, A. 1981. Aesthetics and the Work of Art. The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Harvard University Press. 90–114.
[24]
Danto, A. 1981. Interpretation and Identification. The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Harvard University Press. 115–135.
[25]
Danto, A. 1964. The Artworld. The Journal of Philosophy. 61, 19 (1964). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2022937.
[26]
Danto, A. 1986. The End of Art. The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. Columbia University Press. 81–115.
[27]
Danto, A. 1981. Works of Art and Mere Real Things. The transfiguration of the commonplace: a philosophy of art. Harvard University Press. 1–32.
[28]
Danto, A.C. 1997. After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton University Press.
[29]
Danto, A.C. 1998. Beyond the brillo box: the visual arts in post-historical perspective. University of California Press.
[30]
Danto, A.C. Encounters & reflections: art in the historical present. University of California Press.
[31]
Danto, A.C. 1997. Extract. After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton University Press.
[32]
Danto, A.C. 2005. The philosophical disenfranchisement of art. Columbia University Press.
[33]
Danto, A.C. 1997. Three Decades After the End of Art. After the end of art: contemporary art and the pale of history. Princeton University Press. 25–48.
[34]
Davies, D. 2009. On the Very Idea of ‘Outsider Art’. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 49, 1 (2009), 25–41. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayn056.
[35]
Davies, S. 2006. Authors’ Intentions, Literary Interpretation, and Literary Value. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 46, 3 (2006), 223–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayl001.
[36]
Davies, S. 1991. Definitions of art. Cornell University Press.
[37]
Davies, S. 1991. Definitions of art. Cornell University Press.
[38]
Davies, S. 2006. The philosophy of art. Blackwell Pub.
[39]
Davies, S. 2006. The philosophy of art. Blackwell Pub.
[40]
Dewey, J. 2005. Art as experience. Perigee Books.
[41]
Dickie, G. 1974. Art and the aesthetic: an institutional analysis. Cornell University Press.
[42]
Dissanayake, E. 1988. What is art for?. University of Washington Press.
[43]
Dutton, D. 2009. The art instinct: beauty, pleasure, & human evolution. Oxford University Press.
[44]
Eaton, A.W. 2012. Robust Immoralism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 70, 3 (2012), 281–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6245.2012.01520.x.
[45]
Gaiger, J. 1999. Danto’s Philosophy. Art History. 22, 3 (Sep. 1999), 451–454. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.00168.
[46]
Gaut, B. 2005. The Cluster Account of Art Defended. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 45, 3 (2005), 273–288. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayi032.
[47]
Gaut, B.N. 2007. Art, emotion and ethics. Oxford University Press.
[48]
Gaut, B.N. 2009. Art, emotion and ethics. Oxford University Press.
[49]
Gaut, B.N. and Lopes, D. eds. 2013. The Routledge companion to aesthetics. Routledge.
[50]
Gaut, B.N. and Lopes, D. eds. 2013. The Routledge companion to aesthetics. Routledge.
[51]
Gilmore, J. The life of a style: beginnings and endings in the narrative history of art. Cornell University Press.
[52]
Goldie, P. 2010. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Goldie, P. 2010. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of emotion. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Haapala, A. et al. 1999. The end of art and beyond: essays after Danto. Humanity Books.
[55]
Hagberg, G. and Jost, W. 2010. A companion to the philosophy of literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
[56]
Hagberg, G. and Jost, W. 2010. A companion to the philosophy of literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
[57]
Hagberg, G. and Jost, W. 2010. A companion to the philosophy of literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
[58]
Hagberg, G. and Jost, W. 2010. A companion to the philosophy of literature. Wiley-Blackwell.
[59]
Hegel, G.W.F. et al. 1993. Introductory lectures on aesthetics. Penguin.
[60]
Higgins, K.M. 2007. An Alchemy of Emotion: Rasa and Aesthetic Breakthroughs. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 65, 1 (Jan. 2007), 43–54. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2007.00236.x.
[61]
Hopkins, R. 2005. Aesthetics, Experience, and Discrimination. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 63, 2 (Mar. 2005), 119–133. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-8529.2005.00189.x.
[62]
Huddleston, A. 2012. In Defense of Artistic Value. The Philosophical Quarterly. 62, 249 (Oct. 2012), 705–714. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2012.00089.x.
[63]
International Wittgenstein Symposium 1984. Aesthetics: proceedings of the 8th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Part 1, 15th to 21st August 1983, Kirchberg am Wechsel (Austria). Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky.
[64]
Iseminger, G. 1996. Actual Intentionalism vs. Hypothetical Intentionalism. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 54, 4 (1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/431914.
[65]
Iseminger, G. 1992. Intention and interpretation. Temple University Press.
[66]
Jacobson, D. 1997. In Praise of Immoral Art. Philosophical Topics. 25, 1 (1997), 155–199.
[67]
Kieran, M. 1996. Art, Imagination, and the Cultivation of Morals. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 54, 4 (Autumn 1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/431916.
[68]
Kieran, M. 2006. Art, Morality and Ethics: On the (Im)Moral Character of Art Works and Inter-Relations to Artistic Value. Philosophy Compass. 1, 2 (Mar. 2006), 129–143. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2006.00019.x.
[69]
Kieran, M. 2006. Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Blackwell Pub.
[70]
Kieran, M. 2006. Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Blackwell Pub.
[71]
Kieran, M. 2006. Contemporary debates in aesthetics and the philosophy of art. Blackwell Pub.
[72]
Kieran, M. 2005. Revealing art. Routledge.
[73]
Kivy, P. 2004. The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Blackwell Pub.
[74]
Kivy, P. 2004. The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Blackwell Publishing.
[75]
Kivy, P. 2004. The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Blackwell Pub.
[76]
Kivy, P. 2004. The Blackwell guide to aesthetics. Blackwell Publishing.
[77]
Laetz, B. 2010. Kendall Walton’s ‘Categories of Art’: A Critical Commentary. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 50, 3 (2010), 287–306. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq017.
[78]
Lamarque, P. and Olsen, S.H. 2004. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : the analytic tradition: an anthology. Blackwell.
[79]
Lang, B. 1987. The concept of style. Cornell University Press.
[80]
Levinson, J. ed. 1998. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[81]
Levinson, J. ed. 2001. Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[82]
Levinson, J. ed. 1998. Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[83]
Levinson, J. ed. 1998. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[84]
Levinson, J. ed. 1998. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[85]
Levinson, J. ed. 2001. Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[86]
Levinson, J. ed. 1998. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[87]
Levinson, J. ed. 2001. Aesthetics and ethics: essays at the intersection. Cambridge University Press.
[88]
Levinson, J. 1979. Defining art historically. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 19, 3 (1979), 232–250.
[89]
Levinson, J. 1989. Refining Art Historically. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 47, 1 (Winter 1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/431990.
[90]
Levinson, J. 2005. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
[91]
Levinson, J. 2005. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
[92]
Levinson, J. 2005. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
[93]
Levinson, J. 2005. The Oxford handbook of aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
[94]
Levinson, J. 1996. The pleasures of aesthetics: philosophical essays. Cornell University Press.
[95]
Levinson, J. 1980. What a Musical Work Is. The Journal of Philosophy. 77, 1 (Jan. 1980). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2025596.
[96]
Lind, R. 1992. The Aesthetic Essence of Art. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 50, 2 (Spring 1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/430951.
[97]
Livingston, P. 2005. Art and intention: a philosophical study. Clarendon.
[98]
Livingston, P. 2005. Art and intention: a philosophical study. Clarendon Press.
[99]
Lopes, D. 2014. Beyond art. Oxford University Press.
[100]
Lopes, D. Beyond art.
[101]
Lopes, D. 2014. Beyond art. Oxford University Press.
[102]
Lopes, D. Beyond art.
[103]
Lopes, D.M. 2011. The Myth of (Non‐Aesthetic) Artistic Value. The Philosophical Quarterly. 61, 244 (Jul. 2011), 518–536. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2011.700.x.
[104]
Maes, H. 2010. Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 50, 2 (Apr. 2010), 121–138. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp051.
[105]
Mandelbaum, M. 1965. Family Resemblances and Generalization concerning the Arts. American Philosophical Quarterly. 2, 3 (1965), 219–228.
[106]
Margolis, J. 1999. What, after all, is a work of art?: lectures in the philosophy of art. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[107]
McEvilley, T. Art & otherness : crisis in cultural identity.
[108]
Nathan, D.O. 1973. Categories and Intentions. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 31, 4 (Summer 1973). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/429328.
[109]
Nehamas, A. 1981. The Postulated Author: Critical Monism as a Regulative Ideal. Critical Inquiry. 8, 1 (1981), 133–149.
[110]
Neill, A. and Ridley, A. 2008. Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates. Routledge.
[111]
Neill, A. and Ridley, A. 2008. Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates. Routledge.
[112]
Neill, A. and Ridley, A. 2008. Arguing about art: contemporary philosophical debates. Routledge.
[113]
Parsons, G. 2004. Moderate Formalism As a Theory of the Aesthetic. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 38, 3 (Autumn 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3527441.
[114]
Parsons, G. 2002. Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 42, 3 (2002), 279–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/42.3.279.
[115]
Riggle, N. 2015. On the Aesthetic Ideal. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 55, 4 (Oct. 2015), 433–447. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayv026.
[116]
Riggle, N. 2015. Personal Style and Artistic Style. The Philosophical Quarterly. 65, 261 (2015), 711–731. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqv026.
[117]
Riggle, N. and Hopkins, R. Artistic Style as the Expression of Ideals.
[118]
Robinson, J. 2005. Deeper than reason: emotion and its role in literature, music, and art. Clarendon.
[119]
Robinson, J. 2005. Deeper than reason: emotion and its role in literature, music, and art. Clarendon/Oxford University Press.
[120]
Robinson, J.M. 1985. Style and Personality in the Literary Work. The Philosophical Review. 94, 2 (Apr. 1985). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2185429.
[121]
Rollins, M. 2012. Danto and his critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
[122]
Rollins, M. Danto and His Critics.
[123]
Rollins, M. 2012. Danto and his critics. Wiley-Blackwell.
[124]
Rollins, M. Danto and His Critics.
[125]
Saito, Y. 2007. Everyday aesthetics. Oxford University Press.
[126]
Schellekens, E. 2007. Aesthetics and morality. Continuum.
[127]
Schellekens, E. 2007. Aesthetics and morality. Continuum.
[128]
Shelley, J. 2010. Against Value Empiricism in Aesthetics. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 88, 4 (Dec. 2010), 707–720. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400903207104.
[129]
Shelley, J. 2003. The Problem of Non-Perceptual Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 43, 4 (2003), 363–378. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaesthetics/43.4.363.
[130]
Shusterman, Richard; Tomlin, A. 2007. Aesthetic Experience. Routledge.
[131]
Sibley, F. 1959. Aesthetic Concepts. The Philosophical Review. 68, 4 (Oct. 1959). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2182490.
[132]
Stecker, R. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : an introduction.
[133]
Stecker, R. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : an introduction.
[134]
Stecker, R. Aesthetics and the philosophy of art : an introduction.
[135]
Stecker, R. 2006. Moderate Actual Intentionalism Defended. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 64, 4 (Sep. 2006), 429–438. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-594X.2006.00221.x.
[136]
Stecker, R. 1986. The End of an Institutional Definition of Art. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 26, 2 (1986), 124–132.
[137]
Stecker, R. and Davies, S. 2010. The Hypothetical Intentionalist’s Dilemma: A Reply to Levinson. The British Journal of Aesthetics. 50, 3 (Jul. 2010), 307–312. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayq022.
[138]
Urmson, J.O. 1957. What Makes a Situation Aesthetic? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes. 31, (1957), 75–92.
[139]
Walton, K.L. 1970. Categories of Art. The Philosophical Review. 79, 3 (Jul. 1970). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2183933.
[140]
Weitz, M. 1956. The Role of Theory in Aesthetics. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 15, 1 (Sep. 1956). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/427491.
[141]
Wimsatt, W.K. 1970. The verbal icon: studies in the meaning of poetry. Methuen.
[142]
Wimsatt, W.K. and Beardsley, M.C. 1954. The verbal icon: studies in the meaning of poetry. The University Press of Kentucky.
[143]
Wollheim, R. 2015. Art and its Objects. Cambridge University Press.
[144]
Wollheim, R. 1980. Art and its objects. Cambridge University Press.
[145]
Zangwill, N. 2002. Are There Counterexamples to Aesthetic Theories of Art? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 60, 2 (2002), 111–118. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6245.00059.
[146]
Zangwill, N. 2000. In Defence of Moderate Aesthetic Formalism. The Philosophical Quarterly. 50, 201 (Oct. 2000), 476–493. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9213.00201.
[147]
2007. The journal of aesthetics and art criticism. 65, 1 (2007).