1.
Smith P, Wilde C. A companion to art theory [Internet]. Vol. Blackwell companions in cultural studies. Oxford: Blackwell; 2002. Available from: http://0-onlinelibrary.Wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470998434
2.
Francis Frascina. Institutions, Culture, and America’s ‘Cold War Years’: The Making of Greenberg’s ‘Modernist Painting’. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 2003;26(1):71–97. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3600447?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
3.
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire, Manet, and Modernity. The Modern Language Review. 1992 Jul;87(3).
4.
Meyer Shapiro. ‘The nature of Abstract Art’. Marxist quarterly [Internet]. 1(1):77–98. Available from: https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=’The+nature+of+Abstract+Art’&title=Marxist+quarterly&aufirst=Meyer+Shapiro&auinit=&aulast=&issn=&eissn=&coden=&volume=1&issue=1&spage=77&epage=98&quarter=&ssn=&date=Jan+&sid=&reqtype3
5.
Frascina F, Harrison C, Paul D, Open University. Modern art and modernism: a critical anthology. London: Paul Chapman in association with the Open University; 1988.
6.
Harrison C, Wood P. Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992.
7.
Clement Greenberg,. ‘Avant-Garde and Kitsch’. Partisan review. VI(5):34–49.
8.
T. J. Clark. Clement Greenberg’s Theory of Art. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1982;9(1):139–56. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343277?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
9.
T. J. Clark. A Bourgeois Dance of Death: Max Buchon on Courbet-I. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1969;111(793):208–13. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875972?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
10.
Michael Fried. Painter into Painting: On Courbet’s ‘After Dinner at Ornans’ and ‘Stonebreakers’. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1982;8(4):619–49. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343190?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
11.
Alan Bowness. Courbet’s Proudhon. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1978;120(900):123–30. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/879130?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
12.
Bowness A, Courbet G. Courbet’s L’Atelier du peintre. Vol. Charlton lectures on art. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle upon Tyne; 1972.
13.
Nochlin L. Gustave Courbet’s Meeting: A Portrait of the Artist as a Wandering Jew. The Art Bulletin. 1967 Sep;49(3).
14.
Ting Chang. ‘The Meeting’: Gustave Courbet and Alfred Bruyas. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1996;138(1122):586–91. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/887242?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
15.
Chu P ten-Doesschate. Courbet in perspective. Vol. The artists in perspective series. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
16.
Clark TJ. The absolute bourgeois: artists and politics in France, 1848-1851. London: Thames and Hudson; 1973.
17.
Clark TJ. Image of the people: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 revolution. London: Thames and Hudson; 1973.
18.
Crapo PB. The Problematics of Artistic Patronage under the Second Empire: Gustave Courbet’s Involved Relations with the Regime of Napoleon III. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 1995;58(2).
19.
Frédérique Desbuissons. Courbet’s Materialism. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 2008;31(2):253–60. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20108023?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20.
Faunce S, Nochlin L, Courbet G, Brooklyn Museum of Art, Minneapolis Institute of Arts. Courbet reconsidered. [New York]: Brooklyn Museum; 1988.
21.
Michael Fried. The Structure of Beholding in Courbet’s ‘Burial at Ornans’. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1983;9(4):635–83. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343377?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22.
Michael Fried. Manet in His Generation: The Face of Painting in the 1860s. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1992;19(1):22–69. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343753?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23.
Fried M, Courbet G. Courbet’s realism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1990.
24.
Fried M. Manet’s modernism, or, The face of painting in the 1860s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
25.
Herding K. Courbet: to venture independence. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1991.
26.
Lesko D. From Genre to Allegory in Gustave Courbet’s Les Demoiselles de Village. Art Journal. 1979 Spring;38(3).
27.
Moffitt JF. Art and Politics: An Underlying Pictorial - Political Topos in Courbet’s ‘Real Allegory’. Artibus et Historiae. 1987;8(15).
28.
Nicolson B. Courbet, The studio of the painter. Vol. Art in context. New York: Viking Press;
29.
Przyblyski JM. Courbet, the Commune, and the Meanings of Still Life in 1871. Art Journal. 1996 Summer;55(2).
30.
Rubin JH. Realism and social vision in Courbet & Proudhon. Vol. Princeton essays on the arts. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1980.
31.
Nochlin L. Realism. Vol. Style and civilization. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1990.
32.
Seibert MA. A Political and a Pictorial Tradition Used in Gustave Courbet’s Real Allegory. The Art Bulletin. 1983 Jun;65(2).
33.
Smith P. Manet Bits. Art History. 1997 Sep;20(3):477–82.
34.
Toussaint H, Courbet G, Réunion des musées nationaux (France), Arts Council of Great Britain, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), Royal Academy of Arts (Great Britain). Gustave Courbet: 1819-1877 , (exposition organisée par la Réunion  des musées nationaux et l’Arts Council of Great Britain), Grand  Palais, 30 septembre 1977-2 janvier 1978 , (catalogue. Paris: Ministère de la culture et de l’environnement, Éditions des  musées nationaux; 1977.
35.
Weisberg GP, Cleveland Museum of Art. The realist tradition: French painting and drawing, 1830-1900. Cleveland, Ohio: Cleveland Museum of Art;
36.
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1999.
37.
Is Paris Still the Capital of the Nineteenth Century?: Essays on Art and Modernity, 1850-1900 [Internet]. Routledge; 26AD. Available from: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Paris-Still-Capital-Nineteenth-Century/dp/1472460146
38.
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1999.
39.
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire and the art of memory [Internet]. Oxford: Clarendon; 1999. Available from: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159322.001.0001
40.
Richard Shiff. Handling Shocks: On the Representation of Experience in Walter Benjamin’s Analogies. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 1992;15(2):88–103. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360503?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
41.
Hobbs R. Impressions of French modernity: art and literature in France,  1850-1900. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998.
42.
Tom McDonough. The Crimes of the Flaneur. October [Internet]. 2002;102:101–22. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/779133?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
43.
Herbert RL. Impressionism: art, leisure and Parisian society. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1988.
44.
André Dombrowski. History, Memory, and Instantaneity in Edgar Degas’s ‘Place de la Concorde’. The Art Bulletin [Internet]. 2011;93(2):195–219. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/23046593?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
45.
Burton R. ‘The Unseen Seer, or Proteus in the City: Aspects of a Nineteenth-Century Parisian Myth’. French studies. 1988;XLll:50–68.
46.
Benjamin AE. The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin. Vol. Warwick studies in philosophy and literature. London: Routledge; 1989.
47.
Benjamin AE. The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin. Vol. Warwick studies in philosophy and literature. London: Routledge; 1989.
48.
Smith G. On Walter Benjamin: critical essays and recollections. 1st MIT Press paperback ed. Vol. Studies in contemporary German social thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1991.
49.
Prendergast C. Paris and the nineteenth century. Vol. Writing the city. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992.
50.
Harrison C, Wood P. Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Oxford: Blackwell; 1992.
51.
Michael Fried. Painting Memories: On the Containment of the past in Baudelaire and Manet. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1984;10(3):510–42. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343305?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
52.
Locke N. Unfinished Homage: Manet’s ‘Burial’ and Baudelaire. The Art Bulletin. 2000 Mar;82(1).
53.
Collins BR. Manet’s Luncheon in the Studio: An Homage to Baudelaire. Art Journal. 1978 Winter;38(2).
54.
Juliet Wilson Bareau. The Hidden Face of Manet. An Investigation of the Artist’s Working Processes [Exhibition Catalog]. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1986;128(997). Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/882487?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:997&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00076287&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:i&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:128&searchText=AND&searchText=year:1986&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A997%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00076287%2BAND%2Bsp%253Ai%2BAND%2Bvo%253A128%2BAND%2Byear%253A1986%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
55.
Armstrong CM. Manet Manette. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2002.
56.
Rubin JH. Manet’s silence and the poetics of bouquets. Vol. Essays in art and culture. London: Reaktion; 1994.
57.
Clark TJ. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his  followers. London: Thames and Hudson; 1985.
58.
Mauner GL. Manet, peintre-philosophe: a study of the painter’s themes. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press; 1975.
59.
Locke N. Manet and the family romance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2001.
60.
Hanson AC. Manet and the modern tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1977.
61.
Clark TJ. Preliminaries to a Possible Treatment of ‘Olympia’ in 1865. Screen. 1980 Mar 1;21(1):18–42.
62.
More on a Name: Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and the Defiant Heroine in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/eds/C__S%27More%20on%20a%20Name%3A%20Manet%27s%20%E2%80%98Olympia%E2%80%99%20and%20the%20Defiant%20Heroine%20in%20Mid-Nineteenth-Century%20France%27__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
63.
Reff T, Manet É. Manet - ‘Olympia’. Vol. Art in context. London: Allen Lane; 1976.
64.
Clark TJ. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his  followers. London: Thames and Hudson; 1985.
65.
Lipton E. Alias Olympia: a woman’s search for Manet’s notorious model & her  own desire. London: Thames and Hudson; 1993.
66.
Friedrich O. Olympia: Paris in the age of Manet. London: Aurum Press; 1992.
67.
Thierry de Duve and Brian Holmes. How Manet’s ‘A Bar at the Folies-Bergère’ Is Constructed. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1998;25(1):136–68. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1344137?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
68.
Iskin RE. Selling, Seduction, and Soliciting the Eye: Manet’s Bar at the Folies-Bergere. The Art Bulletin. 1995 Mar;77(1).
69.
Boime A. Manet’s ‘Un bar aux Folies-Bergere’ as an Allegory of Nostalgia. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 1993;56(2).
70.
Carrier D. Art History in the Mirror Stage: Interpreting un Bar aux Folies Bergeres. History and Theory. 1990 Oct;29(3).
71.
Collins BR. 12 Views of Manet’s Bar. Vol. The Princeton series in nineteenth-century art, culture, and society. Chichester: Princeton University Press; 1996.
72.
Isaacson J. Constable, Duranty, Mallarme, Impressionism, Plein Air, and Forgetting. The Art Bulletin. 1994 Sep;76(3).
73.
Smith P. ‘PARBLEU’: PISSARRO AND THE POLITICAL COLOUR OF AN ORIGINAL VISION. Art History. 1992 Jun;15(2):223–47.
74.
Shiff R. Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory,  technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984.
75.
Rewald J, Weitzenhoffer F. Aspects of Monet: a symposium on the artist’s life and times. New York: Abrams; 1984.
76.
Lewis MT. Critical readings in Impressionism and post-Impressionism: an anthology. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2007.
77.
House J. Impressionism: paint and politics. New Haven: Yale University Press; 2004.
78.
Berson R, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. The New painting: impressionism, 1874-1886 : documentation. San Francisco, CA: Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco; 1989.
79.
Rewald J. The history of impressionism. Rev. and enl. ed. New York: Museum of Modern Art; 1961.
80.
Ward M. Pissarro, Neo-impressionism, and the spaces of the avant-garde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1996.
81.
Special Issue: Pissarro. Apollo. 136(369).
82.
Pissarro C, Brettell RR, Pissarro J, Stevens MA, Dallas Museum of Art, Philadelphia Museum of Art, et al. The impressionist and the city: Pissarro’s series paintings. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1992.
83.
Thomson R, Birmingham City Museum and Art Gallery, Burrell Collection. Camille Pissarro: Impressionism, landscape and rural labour. London: Herbert Press; 1990.
84.
Lloyd C. Studies on Camille Pissarro. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1986.
85.
Pissarro C, Hayward Gallery, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Pissarro: Camille Pissarro 1830-1903. (London): Arts Council of Great Britain; 1980.
86.
House J, Monet C. Monet: nature into art. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1986.
87.
Kear J. MAKING HAY WITH MONET: MONETS OF THE ′90s. Art History. 1991 Dec;14(4):593–9.
88.
Brettell RR. Monet’s Haystacks Reconsidered. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 1984 Autumn;11(1).
89.
John Klein. The Dispersal of the Modernist Series. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 1998;21(1):123–35. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360700?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
90.
Levine SZ. Monet’s Series: Repetition, Obsession. October. 1986 Summer;37.
91.
Impressionism : beneath the surface / Paul Smith. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SImpressionism%3A%20Beneath%20the%20Surface%20__Orightresult?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
92.
Spate V, Monet C. The colour of time: Claude Monet. London: Thames and Hudson; 1992.
93.
Tucker PH, Monet C, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Royal Academy of Arts (Great Britain). Monet in the ’90s: the series paintings. 4th printing with corrections. Boston: Museum of Fine Arts; 1990.
94.
Pollock, Griselda. Vision and difference. London: Routledge;
95.
Garb T. ‘L’ART FÉMININ’: THE FORMATION OF A CRITICAL CATEGORY IN LATE NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE. Art History. 1989 Mar;12(1):39–65.
96.
Broude N. Degas’s ‘Misogyny’. The Art Bulletin. 1977 Mar;59(1).
97.
KATHRYN BROWN. The Aesthetics of Presence: Looking at Degas’s ‘Bathers’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism [Internet]. 2010;68(4):331–41. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40929541?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
98.
Harrison C. Painting the difference: sex and spectator in modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 2005.
99.
Broude N. Edgar Degas and French Feminism, ca. 1880: ‘The Young Spartans,’ the Brothel Monotypes, and the Bathers Revisited. The Art Bulletin. 1988 Dec;70(4).
100.
Marilyn R. Brown. ‘Miss La La’s’ Teeth: Reflections on Degas and ‘Race’. The Art Bulletin [Internet]. 2007;89(4):738–65. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25067359?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
101.
Frascina F. Modernity and modernism: French painting in the nineteenth century. Vol. Modern art--practices and debates. New Haven: Yale University Press, in association with the Open University; 1993.
102.
Sidlauskas S. Resisting Narrative: The Problem of Edgar Degas’s Interior. The Art Bulletin. 1993 Dec;75(4).
103.
Elizabeth Easton and Jared Bark. ‘Pictures Properly Framed’: Degas and Innovation in Impressionist Frames. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 2008;150(1266):603–11. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40479868?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
104.
Richard Kendall. Degas and the Contingency of Vision. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1988;130(1020):180–216. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/883345?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
105.
Reff T. The Technical Aspects of Degas’s Art. Metropolitan Museum Journal. 1971 Jan;4:141–66.
106.
Armstrong CM. Odd man out: readings of the work and reputation of Edgar Degas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1991.
107.
Pollock G, Kendall R. Dealing with Degas: representations of women and the politics of  vision. London: Pandora; 1992.
108.
Lipton E, Degas E. Looking into Degas: uneasy images of women and modern life. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1986.
109.
Callen A. The spectacular body: science, method and meaning in the work of  Degas. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1995.
110.
Reff T. Degas, the artist’s mind. London: Thames and Hudson; 1976.
111.
Thomson R, Degas E. Degas: the nudes. London: Thames and Hudson; 1988.
112.
Kessler MR. Unmasking Manet’s Morisot. The Art Bulletin. 1999 Sep;81(3).
113.
Broude N. Mary Cassatt: Modern Woman or the Cult of True Womanhood? Woman’s Art Journal. 2000 Autumn;21(2).
114.
Yeh SF. Mary Cassatt’s Images of Women. Art Journal. 1976 Summer;35(4).
115.
Impressionism: A Feminist Reading: The Gendering Of Art, Science, And Nature In The Nineteenth Century by Broude, Norma (1997) Paperback [Internet]. Available from: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Impressionism-Feminist-Gendering-Nineteenth-Paperback/dp/B01071FG2I/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459857940&sr=1-1&keywords=%2C+Impressionism%3A+a+Feminist+Reading
116.
Broude N. Impressionism: a feminist reading ; the gendering of art, science, and nature in the nineteenth century. New York: Rizzoli; 1991.
117.
Garb T. Bodies of modernity: figure and flesh in fin-de-siècle France. Vol. Interplay. arts and history and theory. London: Thames & Hudson; 1998.
118.
Pollock G, Cassatt M. Mary Cassatt: painter of modern women. Vol. World of art. London: Thames & Hudson; 1998.
119.
Jill DeVonyar and Richard Kendall. The Class of 1881: Degas, Drawing, and the ‘Little Dancer Aged Fourteen’. Master Drawings [Internet]. 2003;41(2):151–62. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1554585?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
120.
Daphne S. Barbour. Degas’s Wax Sculptures from the inside out. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1992;134(1077):798–805. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/885352?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
121.
Kendall R, Joslyn Art Museum. Degas and the little dancer. New Haven: Yale University Press in association with Joslyn  Art Museum, Omaha; 1998.
122.
June Hargrove. ‘Degas’s Little dancer in the world of pantomime’. Apollo. 147(432):15–21.
123.
Czestochowski JS, Pingeot A. Degas sculptures: catalogue raisonné of the bronzes. New York: Torch Press; 2002.
124.
Shiff R. Constructing Physicality. Art Journal. 1991 Spring;50(1).
125.
Smith P. Cézanne’s "Primitive” Perspective, or the "View from Everywhere”. The Art Bulletin. 2013 Mar;95(1):102–19.
126.
Richard Shiff. Seeing Cézanne. Critical Inquiry [Internet]. 1978;4(4):769–808. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1342954?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
127.
Bois YA, Krauss R. Cezanne: Words and Deeds. October. 1998 Spring;84.
128.
Value, art, politics. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press; 2007.
129.
Cézanne P, Doran PM. Conversations with Cézanne. Vol. Documents of twentieth-century art. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2001.
130.
Gaskell I, Kemal S. The Language of art history. Vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
131.
Shiff R. Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory,  technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1984.
132.
Cézanne P, Reff T, Rubin W, Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.). Cézanne: the late work. London: Thames and Hudson; 1978.
133.
Loran E, Cézanne P. Cézanne’s composition: analysis of his form with diagrams and photographs of his motifs. 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2006.
134.
Cézanne P, Cézanne P, Smith P, Athanassoglou-Kallmyer NM, Art Gallery of Hamilton. The world is an apple: the still lifes of Paul Cézanne. Leca B, editor. [Hamilton, Ontario]: Art Gallery of Hamilton in association with D Giles Limited; 2014.
135.
Paul Smith,. ’Joachim Gasquet, Virgil and Cézanne’s Landscape: ‘My Beloved Golden Age’. Apollo. 147(147,):11–23.
136.
Athanassoglou-Kallmyer NM, Cézanne P. Cézanne and Provence: the painter in his culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2003.
137.
Clark TJ. Freud’s Cézanne. Representations. 1995 Oct;(52):94–122.
138.
Tamar Garb. Visuality and Sexuality in Cézanne’s Late Bathers. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 1996;19(2):46–60. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360728?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
139.
Mary Louise Krumrine. Cézanne’s ‘Restricted Power’: Further Reflections on the ‘Bathers’. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1992;134(1074):586–95. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/885313?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
140.
Reff T. Cezanne, Flaubert, St. Anthony, and the Queen of Sheba. The Art Bulletin. 1962 Jun;44(2).
141.
Arbiter P. A Degenerate Work of Art: ‘The Bathers’ by Cézanne. The Art World. 1918;3(4).
142.
Mary Louise Krumrine. Paul Cézanne. London: Thames and Hudson in association with Kunstmuseum Basel; 1990.
143.
D’Souza A. Cézanne’s bathers: biography and the erotics of paint. Vol. Refiguring modernism. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2008.
144.
Geist S. Interpreting Cézanne. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 1988.
145.
Seurat Re-viewed (Refiguring Modernism) (2010-04-30) [Internet]. Penn State University Press (2010-04-30); 2010. Available from: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seurat-Re-viewed-Refiguring-Modernism-2010-04-30/dp/B01A64HFDE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459870139&sr=1-1&keywords=Seurat+Re-Viewed
146.
Linda Goddard. ‘The Writings of a Savage?’ Literary Strategies in Paul Gauguin’s “Noa Noa”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes [Internet]. 2008;71:277–93. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20462786?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
147.
Steiner W. Divide and narrate: the icon-symbol tension in Seurat. Word & Image. 1986 Oct;2(4):342–8.
148.
Smith P, Seurat G. Seurat and the avant-garde. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1997.
149.
Seurat G, Kahn G. The drawings of Georges Seurat. New York: Dover Publications; 1971.
150.
Halperin JU. Félix Fénéon: aesthete & anarchist in fin-de-siècle Paris. New Haven, (Conn.): Yale University Press; 1988.
151.
Homer WI. Seurat and the science of painting. [S.l.]: M.I.T. Press; 1964.
152.
Seurat G, Herbert RL, Cachin F, Tinterow G, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.). Seurat: Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, Paris, 9 avril-12  août1991. Paris: Éditions de la Reunion des musées nationaux; 1991.
153.
Broude N. Seurat in perspective. Vol. The artists in perspective series. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1978.
154.
House J. MEANING IN SEURAT’S FIGURE PAINTINGS. Art History. 1980 Sep;3(3):345–56.
155.
Clayson SH. The Family and the Father: The ‘Grande Jatte’ and Its Absences. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 1989;14(2).
156.
Nochlin L. Seurat’s Grande Jatte: An Anti-Utopian Allegory. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 1989;14(2).
157.
Stumpel J. The ‘Grande Jatte,’ That Patient Tapestry. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art. 1984;14(3/4).
158.
Herbert RL, Harris N, Seurat G, Art Institute of Chicago. Seurat: and the making of La Grande Jatte. Chicago, Ill: The Art Institute of Chicago in association with University of California Press; 2004.
159.
Museum of Fine Arts. Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? | Museum of Fine Arts, Boston [Internet]. Boston,; Available from: http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/where-do-we-come-from-what-are-we-where-are-we-going-32558
160.
Cheetham MA. Mystical Memories: Gauguin’s Neoplatonism and ‘Abstraction’ in Late-Nineteenth-Century French Painting. Art Journal. 1987 Spring;46(1).
161.
Edward D. Powers. From Eternity to Here: Paul Gauguin and the Word Made Flesh. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 2002;25(2):89–106. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3600479?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
162.
Bengt Danielsson. Gauguin’s Tahitian Titles. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1967;109(769):228–33. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875243?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
163.
III MH. The Origin of Paul Gauguin’s Vision after the Sermon: Jacob Wrestling with the Angel (1888). The Art Bulletin. 1977 Sep;59(3).
164.
Jirat-Wasiutynski V. Paul Gauguin’s ‘Self-Portrait with Halo and Snake’: The Artist as Initiate and Magus. Art Journal. 1987 Spring;46(1).
165.
Ziva Amishai-Maisels. Gauguin’s ‘Philosophical Eve’. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1973;115(843):373–82. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/877381?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
166.
Eisenman S. Gauguin’s skirt. London: Thames and Hudson; 1997.
167.
Thomson B. Gauguin. Vol. World of art. New York, N.Y.: Thames and Hudson; 2001.
168.
Jirat-Wasiutyński V, Gauguin P, Newton HT. Technique and meaning in the paintings of Paul Gauguin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
169.
Wayne V. Andersen. Gauguin and a Peruvian Mummy. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1967;109(769):238–43. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
170.
Shackelford GTM, Gauguin P, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Paul Gauguin: Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Boston: MFA publications, Museum of Fine Arts; 2013.
171.
Murray A. ‘STRANGE AND SUBTLE PERSPECTIVE …’: Van Gogh, The Hague School and the Dutch Landscape Tradition. Art History. 1980 Dec;3(4):410–24.
172.
Wright A. Arche-tectures: Matisse and the End of (Art) History. October. 1998 Spring;84.
173.
The letters - Vincent van Gogh Letters [Internet]. Available from: http://vangoghletters.org/vg/letters.html
174.
Sund J. FAVOURED FICTIONS: WOMEN AND BOOKS IN THE ART OF VAN GOGH. Art History. 1988 Jun;11(2):255–67.
175.
Zemel C. SORROWING WOMEN, RESCUING MEN: VAN GOGH’S IMAGES OF WOMEN AND FAMILY. Art History. 1987 Sep;10(3):351–68.
176.
Kodera T. Japan as Primitivistic Utopia: Van Gogh’s Japonisme Portraits. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art. 1984;14(3/4).
177.
Loretta S. Loftus and Wilfred Niels Arnold. Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness: Acute Intermittent Porphyria? BMJ: British Medical Journal [Internet]. 1991;303(6817):1589–91. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/29714050?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
178.
Kay Redfield Jamison and Richard Jed Wyatt. Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness. BMJ: British Medical Journal [Internet]. 6826;304(6826). Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/29714734?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:6826&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:09598138&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:577&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:304&searchText=AND&searchText=year:1992&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A6826%2BAND%2Bsn%253A09598138%2BAND%2Bsp%253A577%2BAND%2Bvo%253A304%2BAND%2Byear%253A1992%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
179.
McQuillan MA, Gogh V van. Van Gogh. Vol. World of art. New York, N.Y.: Thames and Hudson; 2005.
180.
Nochlin L. Impressionism and post-impressionism, 1874-1904: sources and  documents. Vol. Sources and documents in the history of art series. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall;
181.
Hulsker J, Hulsker J, Miller JM. Vincent and Theo van Gogh: a dual biography. Ann Arbor: Fuller Publications; 1990.
182.
Gogh V van, Pickvance R, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.). Van Gogh in Arles. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art; 1984.
183.
Thomson R, Thomson R, National Gallery of Scotland. Framing France: the representation of landscape in France, 1870-1914. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1998.
184.
Kōdera T, Rosenberg Y. The Mythology of Vincent Van Gogh. Tokyo: TV Asahi; 1993.
185.
Druick DW, Zegers P, Salvesen B, Art Institute of Chicago, Rijksmuseum (Netherlands). Van Gogh and Gauguin: the studio of the south. London: Thames & Hudson; 2001.
186.
Roskill MW. Van Gogh, Gauguin and the Impressionist circle. Vol. New aspects of art. London: Thames and Hudson;
187.
Silverman D. Van Gogh and Gauguin: the search for sacred art. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux; 2001.
188.
Benjamin R. Orientalist aesthetics: art, colonialism, and French North Africa,  1880-1930. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press; 2003.
189.
Bois YA, Sims G. On Matisse: The Blinding: For Leo Steinberg. October. 1994 Spring;68.
190.
Carrier D. The Beauty of Henri Matisse. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 2004 Summer;38(2).
191.
John Tchalenko. Henri Matisse Drawing: An Eye-Hand Interaction Study Based on Archival Film. Leonardo [Internet]. 2009;42(5):433–8. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40540062?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
192.
Matisse H, Flam JD. Matisse on art. New York: Phaidon; 1973.
193.
Roger Benjamin. Matisse’s ‘Notes of a painter’. Ann Arbor, Mich: UMI Research Press; 1987.
194.
Bock-Weiss C, Matisse H. Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2009.
195.
Wright A. Matisse and the subject of modernism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2004.
196.
Flam JD, Matisse H. Matisse: the man and his art, 1869-1918. London: Thames and Hudson; 1986.
197.
Herbert JD. Fauve painting: the making of cultural politics. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1992.
198.
Werth M. The joy of life: the idyllic in French art, circa 1900. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.
199.
Bock-Weiss C, Matisse H. Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press; 2009.
200.
Bock CC. Henri Matisse’s ‘Bathers by a River’. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 1990;16(1).
201.
Brettell RR, Gogh V. Van Gogh’s ‘Bedrooms at Arles’: The Problem of Priority. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 1986;12(2).
202.
Heelan PA. Toward a New Analysis of the Pictorial Space of Vincent Van Gogh. The Art Bulletin. 1972 Dec;54(4).
203.
Ward JL. A Reexamination of Van Gogh’s Pictorial Space. The Art Bulletin. 1976 Dec;58(4).
204.
Bois YA, Streip K. Kahnweiler’s Lesson. Representations. 1987 Apr;(18):33–68.
205.
Leighten P. Revising Cubism. Art Journal. 1988 Winter;47(4).
206.
Patricia Leighten. Cubist Anachronisms: Ahistoricity, Cryptoformalism, and Business-as-Usual in New York. Oxford Art Journal [Internet]. 1994;17(2):91–102. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
207.
Antliff RM. Bergson and Cubism: A Reassessment. Art Journal. 1988 Winter;47(4).
208.
Zelevansky L. Picasso and Braque: a symposium. New York: Museum of Modern Art; 1992.
209.
Clark TJ, Picasso P. Picasso and truth: from cubism to Guernica. Vol. Bollingen series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 2013.
210.
Zelevansky L. Picasso and Braque: a symposium. New York: Museum of Modern Art; 1992.
211.
Karmel P. Picasso and the invention of Cubism. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 2003.
212.
Cox N. Cubism. Vol. Art&ideas. London: Phaidon Press Limited; 2000.
213.
Poggi C. In defiance of painting: cubism, futurism, and the invention of  collage. Vol. Yale publications in the history of art. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press; 1992.
214.
Leighten PD. Re-ordering the universe: Picasso and anarchism, 1897-1914. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1989.
215.
Golding J. Cubism: a history and an analysis, 1907-1914. London: Faber; 1959.
216.
Braque G, Golding J, Bowness S, South Bank Centre, Walker Art Gallery, City of Bristol Museum and Art Gallery. Braque: still lifes and interiors : a South Bank Centre touring  exhibition. London: South Bank Centre; 1990.
217.
William Cloonan. Braque’s Le Portugais and a Portuguese Nun. The French Review [Internet]. 1990;63(4):607–16. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/396012?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
218.
Kahng E, Kimbell Art Museum, Santa Barbara Museum of Art. Picasso and Braque: the Cubist experiment, 1910-1912. Santa Barbara, Calif: Santa Barbara Museum of Art; 2011.
219.
Rubin W, Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.). Picasso and Braque: pioneering cubism. New York: Museum of Modern Art; 1989.
220.
Mullins EB, Braque G. Braque. Vol. World of art library. London: Thames and Hudson; 1968.
221.
Steinberg L. The Philosophical Brothel. October. 1988 Spring;44.
222.
John Golding. The ‘Demoiselles d’Avignon’. The Burlington Magazine [Internet]. 1958;100(662):154–63. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/872425?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
223.
Rubin W. From Narrative to ‘Iconic’ in Picasso: The Buried Allegory in Bread and Fruitdish on a Table and the Role of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. The Art Bulletin. 1983 Dec;65(4).
224.
Steefel LD. The Neglected Fruit Cluster in Picasso’s ‘Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’. Artibus et Historiae. 1992;13(26).
225.
Chave AC. New Encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon: Gender, Race, and the Origins of Cubism. The Art Bulletin. 1994 Dec;76(4).
226.
Martensen-Larsen B. When Did Picasso Complete ‘Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’? Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 1985;48(2).
227.
Penrose R, Golding J, Kahnweiler DH. Picasso in retrospect. London: Granada; 1981.