[1]
P. Smith and C. Wilde, A companion to art theory, vol. Blackwell companions in cultural studies. Oxford: Blackwell, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.Wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470998434
[2]
Francis Frascina, ‘Institutions, Culture, and America’s “Cold War Years”: The Making of Greenberg’s “Modernist Painting”’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 71–97, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3600447?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[3]
J. A. Hiddleston, ‘Baudelaire, Manet, and Modernity’, The Modern Language Review, vol. 87, no. 3, Jul. 1992, doi: 10.2307/3732920.
[4]
Meyer Shapiro, ‘“The nature of Abstract Art”’, Marxist quarterly, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–98 [Online]. Available: https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=’The+nature+of+Abstract+Art’&title=Marxist+quarterly&aufirst=Meyer+Shapiro&auinit=&aulast=&issn=&eissn=&coden=&volume=1&issue=1&spage=77&epage=98&quarter=&ssn=&date=Jan+&sid=&reqtype3
[5]
F. Frascina, C. Harrison, D. Paul, and Open University, Modern art and modernism: a critical anthology. London: Paul Chapman in association with the Open University, 1988.
[6]
C. Harrison and P. Wood, Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
[7]
Clement Greenberg, ‘“Avant-Garde and Kitsch”’, Partisan review, vol. VI, no. 5, pp. 34–49.
[8]
T. J. Clark, ‘Clement Greenberg’s Theory of Art’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 139–156, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343277?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[9]
T. J. Clark, ‘A Bourgeois Dance of Death: Max Buchon on Courbet-I’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 111, no. 793, pp. 208–213, 1969 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875972?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[10]
Michael Fried, ‘Painter into Painting: On Courbet’s “After Dinner at Ornans” and “Stonebreakers”’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 619–649, 1982 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343190?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[11]
Alan Bowness, ‘Courbet’s Proudhon’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 120, no. 900, pp. 123–130, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/879130?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[12]
A. Bowness and G. Courbet, Courbet’s L’Atelier du peintre, vol. Charlton lectures on art. Newcastle upon Tyne: University of Newcastle upon Tyne, 1972.
[13]
L. Nochlin, ‘Gustave Courbet’s Meeting: A Portrait of the Artist as a Wandering Jew’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 49, no. 3, Sep. 1967, doi: 10.2307/3048470.
[14]
Ting Chang, ‘“The Meeting”: Gustave Courbet and Alfred Bruyas’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 138, no. 1122, pp. 586–591, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/887242?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[15]
P. ten-Doesschate Chu, Courbet in perspective, vol. The artists in perspective series. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
[16]
T. J. Clark, The absolute bourgeois: artists and politics in France, 1848-1851. London: Thames and Hudson, 1973.
[17]
T. J. Clark, Image of the people: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 revolution. London: Thames and Hudson, 1973.
[18]
P. B. Crapo, ‘The Problematics of Artistic Patronage under the Second Empire: Gustave Courbet’s Involved Relations with the Regime of Napoleon III’, Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte, vol. 58, no. 2, 1995, doi: 10.2307/1482704.
[19]
Frédérique Desbuissons, ‘Courbet’s Materialism’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 253–260, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20108023?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[20]
S. Faunce, L. Nochlin, G. Courbet, Brooklyn Museum of Art, and Minneapolis Institute of Arts, Courbet reconsidered. [New York]: Brooklyn Museum, 1988.
[21]
Michael Fried, ‘The Structure of Beholding in Courbet’s “Burial at Ornans”’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 635–683, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343377?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[22]
Michael Fried, ‘Manet in His Generation: The Face of Painting in the 1860s’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–69, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343753?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[23]
M. Fried and G. Courbet, Courbet’s realism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990.
[24]
M. Fried, Manet’s modernism, or, The face of painting in the 1860s. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
[25]
K. Herding, Courbet: to venture independence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1991.
[26]
D. Lesko, ‘From Genre to Allegory in Gustave Courbet’s Les Demoiselles de Village’, Art Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, Spring 1979, doi: 10.2307/776270.
[27]
J. F. Moffitt, ‘Art and Politics: An Underlying Pictorial - Political Topos in Courbet’s “Real Allegory”’, Artibus et Historiae, vol. 8, no. 15, 1987, doi: 10.2307/1483277.
[28]
B. Nicolson, Courbet, The studio of the painter, vol. Art in context. New York: Viking Press.
[29]
J. M. Przyblyski, ‘Courbet, the Commune, and the Meanings of Still Life in 1871’, Art Journal, vol. 55, no. 2, Summer 1996, doi: 10.2307/777743.
[30]
J. H. Rubin, Realism and social vision in Courbet & Proudhon, vol. Princeton essays on the arts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980.
[31]
L. Nochlin, Realism, vol. Style and civilization. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1990.
[32]
M. A. Seibert, ‘A Political and a Pictorial Tradition Used in Gustave Courbet’s Real Allegory’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 65, no. 2, Jun. 1983, doi: 10.2307/3050325.
[33]
P. Smith, ‘Manet Bits’, Art History, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 477–482, Sep. 1997, doi: 10.1111/1467-8365.00072.
[34]
H. Toussaint, G. Courbet, Réunion des musées nationaux (France), Arts Council of Great Britain, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), and Royal Academy of Arts (Great Britain), Gustave Courbet: 1819-1877 , (exposition organisée par la Réunion  des musées nationaux et l’Arts Council of Great Britain), Grand  Palais, 30 septembre 1977-2 janvier 1978 , (catalogue. Paris: Ministère de la culture et de l’environnement, Éditions des  musées nationaux, 1977.
[35]
G. P. Weisberg and Cleveland Museum of Art, The realist tradition: French painting and drawing, 1830-1900. Cleveland, Ohio: Cleveland Museum of Art.
[36]
J. A. Hiddleston, Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
[37]
Is Paris Still the Capital of the Nineteenth Century?: Essays on Art and Modernity, 1850-1900. Routledge, 26AD [Online]. Available: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Paris-Still-Capital-Nineteenth-Century/dp/1472460146
[38]
J. A. Hiddleston, Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1999.
[39]
J. A. Hiddleston, Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: Clarendon, 1999 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159322.001.0001
[40]
Richard Shiff, ‘Handling Shocks: On the Representation of Experience in Walter Benjamin’s Analogies’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 88–103, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360503?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[41]
R. Hobbs, Impressions of French modernity: art and literature in France,  1850-1900. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.
[42]
Tom McDonough, ‘The Crimes of the Flaneur’, October, vol. 102, pp. 101–122, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/779133?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[43]
R. L. Herbert, Impressionism: art, leisure and Parisian society. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press, 1988.
[44]
André Dombrowski, ‘History, Memory, and Instantaneity in Edgar Degas’s “Place de la Concorde”’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 93, no. 2, pp. 195–219, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/23046593?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[45]
R. Burton, ‘“The Unseen Seer, or Proteus in the City: Aspects of a Nineteenth-Century Parisian Myth”’, French studies, vol. XLll, pp. 50–68, 1988.
[46]
A. E. Benjamin, The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin, vol. Warwick studies in philosophy and literature. London: Routledge, 1989.
[47]
A. E. Benjamin, The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin, vol. Warwick studies in philosophy and literature. London: Routledge, 1989.
[48]
G. Smith, On Walter Benjamin: critical essays and recollections, 1st MIT Press paperback ed., vol. Studies in contemporary German social thought. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1991.
[49]
C. Prendergast, Paris and the nineteenth century, vol. Writing the city. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
[50]
C. Harrison and P. Wood, Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
[51]
Michael Fried, ‘Painting Memories: On the Containment of the past in Baudelaire and Manet’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 510–542, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343305?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[52]
N. Locke, ‘Unfinished Homage: Manet’s “Burial” and Baudelaire’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 82, no. 1, Mar. 2000, doi: 10.2307/3051365.
[53]
B. R. Collins, ‘Manet’s Luncheon in the Studio: An Homage to Baudelaire’, Art Journal, vol. 38, no. 2, Winter 1978, doi: 10.2307/776419.
[54]
Juliet Wilson Bareau, ‘The Hidden Face of Manet. An Investigation of the Artist’s Working Processes [Exhibition Catalog]’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 128, no. 997, 1986 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/882487?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:997&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00076287&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:i&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:128&searchText=AND&searchText=year:1986&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A997%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00076287%2BAND%2Bsp%253Ai%2BAND%2Bvo%253A128%2BAND%2Byear%253A1986%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[55]
C. M. Armstrong, Manet Manette. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2002.
[56]
J. H. Rubin, Manet’s silence and the poetics of bouquets, vol. Essays in art and culture. London: Reaktion, 1994.
[57]
T. J. Clark, The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his  followers. London: Thames and Hudson, 1985.
[58]
G. L. Mauner, Manet, peintre-philosophe: a study of the painter’s themes. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1975.
[59]
N. Locke, Manet and the family romance. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2001.
[60]
A. C. Hanson, Manet and the modern tradition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977.
[61]
T. J. Clark, ‘Preliminaries to a Possible Treatment of “Olympia” in 1865’, Screen, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 18–42, Mar. 1980, doi: 10.1093/screen/21.1.18.
[62]
‘More on a Name: Manet’s “Olympia” and the Defiant Heroine in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France’ [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/eds/C__S%27More%20on%20a%20Name%3A%20Manet%27s%20%E2%80%98Olympia%E2%80%99%20and%20the%20Defiant%20Heroine%20in%20Mid-Nineteenth-Century%20France%27__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
[63]
T. Reff and É. Manet, Manet - ‘Olympia’, vol. Art in context. London: Allen Lane, 1976.
[64]
T. J. Clark, The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his  followers. London: Thames and Hudson, 1985.
[65]
E. Lipton, Alias Olympia: a woman’s search for Manet’s notorious model & her  own desire. London: Thames and Hudson, 1993.
[66]
O. Friedrich, Olympia: Paris in the age of Manet. London: Aurum Press, 1992.
[67]
Thierry de Duve and Brian Holmes, ‘How Manet’s “A Bar at the Folies-Bergère” Is Constructed’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 136–168, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1344137?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[68]
R. E. Iskin, ‘Selling, Seduction, and Soliciting the Eye: Manet’s Bar at the Folies-Bergere’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 77, no. 1, Mar. 1995, doi: 10.2307/3046078.
[69]
A. Boime, ‘Manet’s “Un bar aux Folies-Bergere” as an Allegory of Nostalgia’, Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte, vol. 56, no. 2, 1993, doi: 10.2307/1482637.
[70]
D. Carrier, ‘Art History in the Mirror Stage: Interpreting un Bar aux Folies Bergeres’, History and Theory, vol. 29, no. 3, Oct. 1990, doi: 10.2307/2505053.
[71]
B. R. Collins, 12 Views of Manet’s Bar, vol. The Princeton series in nineteenth-century art, culture, and society. Chichester: Princeton University Press, 1996.
[72]
J. Isaacson, ‘Constable, Duranty, Mallarme, Impressionism, Plein Air, and Forgetting’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 3, Sep. 1994, doi: 10.2307/3046037.
[73]
P. Smith, ‘“PARBLEU”: PISSARRO AND THE POLITICAL COLOUR OF AN ORIGINAL VISION’, Art History, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 223–247, Jun. 1992, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1992.tb00482.x.
[74]
R. Shiff, Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory,  technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
[75]
J. Rewald and F. Weitzenhoffer, Aspects of Monet: a symposium on the artist’s life and times. New York: Abrams, 1984.
[76]
M. T. Lewis, Critical readings in Impressionism and post-Impressionism: an anthology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
[77]
J. House, Impressionism: paint and politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2004.
[78]
R. Berson and Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, The New painting: impressionism, 1874-1886 : documentation. San Francisco, CA: Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco, 1989.
[79]
J. Rewald, The history of impressionism, Rev. and enl. Ed. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1961.
[80]
M. Ward, Pissarro, Neo-impressionism, and the spaces of the avant-garde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996.
[81]
‘Special Issue: Pissarro’, Apollo, vol. 136, no. 369.
[82]
C. Pissarro et al., The impressionist and the city: Pissarro’s series paintings. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
[83]
R. Thomson, Birmingham City Museum and Art Gallery, and Burrell Collection, Camille Pissarro: Impressionism, landscape and rural labour. London: Herbert Press, 1990.
[84]
C. Lloyd, Studies on Camille Pissarro. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1986.
[85]
C. Pissarro, Hayward Gallery, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Pissarro: Camille Pissarro 1830-1903. (London): Arts Council of Great Britain, 1980.
[86]
J. House and C. Monet, Monet: nature into art. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1986.
[87]
J. Kear, ‘MAKING HAY WITH MONET: MONETS OF THE ′90s’, Art History, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 593–599, Dec. 1991, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1991.tb00459.x.
[88]
R. R. Brettell, ‘Monet’s Haystacks Reconsidered’, Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, Autumn 1984, doi: 10.2307/4115885.
[89]
John Klein, ‘The Dispersal of the Modernist Series’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 123–135, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360700?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[90]
S. Z. Levine, ‘Monet’s Series: Repetition, Obsession’, October, vol. 37, Summer 1986, doi: 10.2307/778519.
[91]
‘Impressionism : beneath the surface / Paul Smith’ [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SImpressionism%3A%20Beneath%20the%20Surface%20__Orightresult?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
[92]
V. Spate and C. Monet, The colour of time: Claude Monet. London: Thames and Hudson, 1992.
[93]
P. H. Tucker, C. Monet, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, and Royal Academy of Arts (Great Britain), Monet in the ’90s: the series paintings, 4th printing with corrections. Boston: Museum of Fine Arts, 1990.
[94]
Pollock, Griselda., Vision and difference. London: Routledge.
[95]
T. Garb, ‘“L’ART FÉMININ”: THE FORMATION OF A CRITICAL CATEGORY IN LATE NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE’, Art History, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–65, Mar. 1989, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1989.tb00336.x.
[96]
N. Broude, ‘Degas’s “Misogyny”’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 59, no. 1, Mar. 1977, doi: 10.2307/3049600.
[97]
KATHRYN BROWN, ‘The Aesthetics of Presence: Looking at Degas’s “Bathers”’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 331–341, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40929541?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[98]
C. Harrison, Painting the difference: sex and spectator in modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[99]
N. Broude, ‘Edgar Degas and French Feminism, ca. 1880: “The Young Spartans,” the Brothel Monotypes, and the Bathers Revisited’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 70, no. 4, Dec. 1988, doi: 10.2307/3051106.
[100]
Marilyn R. Brown, ‘“Miss La La’s” Teeth: Reflections on Degas and “Race”’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 738–765, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25067359?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[101]
F. Frascina, Modernity and modernism: French painting in the nineteenth century, vol. Modern art--practices and debates. New Haven: Yale University Press, in association with the Open University, 1993.
[102]
S. Sidlauskas, ‘Resisting Narrative: The Problem of Edgar Degas’s Interior’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 75, no. 4, Dec. 1993, doi: 10.2307/3045989.
[103]
Elizabeth Easton and Jared Bark, ‘“Pictures Properly Framed”: Degas and Innovation in Impressionist Frames’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 150, no. 1266, pp. 603–611, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40479868?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[104]
Richard Kendall, ‘Degas and the Contingency of Vision’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 130, no. 1020, pp. 180–216, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/883345?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[105]
T. Reff, ‘The Technical Aspects of Degas’s Art’, Metropolitan Museum Journal, vol. 4, pp. 141–166, Jan. 1971, doi: 10.2307/1512619.
[106]
C. M. Armstrong, Odd man out: readings of the work and reputation of Edgar Degas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
[107]
G. Pollock and R. Kendall, Dealing with Degas: representations of women and the politics of  vision. London: Pandora, 1992.
[108]
E. Lipton and E. Degas, Looking into Degas: uneasy images of women and modern life. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.
[109]
A. Callen, The spectacular body: science, method and meaning in the work of  Degas. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1995.
[110]
T. Reff, Degas, the artist’s mind. London: Thames and Hudson, 1976.
[111]
R. Thomson and E. Degas, Degas: the nudes. London: Thames and Hudson, 1988.
[112]
M. R. Kessler, ‘Unmasking Manet’s Morisot’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 81, no. 3, Sep. 1999, doi: 10.2307/3051353.
[113]
N. Broude, ‘Mary Cassatt: Modern Woman or the Cult of True Womanhood?’, Woman’s Art Journal, vol. 21, no. 2, Autumn 2000, doi: 10.2307/1358749.
[114]
S. F. Yeh, ‘Mary Cassatt’s Images of Women’, Art Journal, vol. 35, no. 4, Summer 1976, doi: 10.2307/776228.
[115]
Impressionism: A Feminist Reading: The Gendering Of Art, Science, And Nature In The Nineteenth Century by Broude, Norma (1997) Paperback. [Online]. Available: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Impressionism-Feminist-Gendering-Nineteenth-Paperback/dp/B01071FG2I/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459857940&sr=1-1&keywords=%2C+Impressionism%3A+a+Feminist+Reading
[116]
N. Broude, Impressionism: a feminist reading ; the gendering of art, science, and nature in the nineteenth century. New York: Rizzoli, 1991.
[117]
T. Garb, Bodies of modernity: figure and flesh in fin-de-siècle France, vol. Interplay. arts and history and theory. London: Thames & Hudson, 1998.
[118]
G. Pollock and M. Cassatt, Mary Cassatt: painter of modern women, vol. World of art. London: Thames & Hudson, 1998.
[119]
Jill DeVonyar and Richard Kendall, ‘The Class of 1881: Degas, Drawing, and the “Little Dancer Aged Fourteen”’, Master Drawings, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1554585?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[120]
Daphne S. Barbour, ‘Degas’s Wax Sculptures from the inside out’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 134, no. 1077, pp. 798–805, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/885352?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[121]
R. Kendall and Joslyn Art Museum, Degas and the little dancer. New Haven: Yale University Press in association with Joslyn  Art Museum, Omaha, 1998.
[122]
June Hargrove, ‘“Degas’s Little dancer in the world of pantomime”’, Apollo, vol. 147, no. 432, pp. 15–21.
[123]
J. S. Czestochowski and A. Pingeot, Degas sculptures: catalogue raisonné of the bronzes. New York: Torch Press, 2002.
[124]
R. Shiff, ‘Constructing Physicality’, Art Journal, vol. 50, no. 1, Spring 1991, doi: 10.2307/777084.
[125]
P. Smith, ‘Cézanne’s "Primitive” Perspective, or the "View from Everywhere”’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 102–119, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1080/00043079.2013.10786108.
[126]
Richard Shiff, ‘Seeing Cézanne’, Critical Inquiry, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 769–808, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1342954?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[127]
Y.-A. Bois and R. Krauss, ‘Cezanne: Words and Deeds’, October, vol. 84, Spring 1998, doi: 10.2307/779207.
[128]
Value, art, politics. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2007.
[129]
P. Cézanne and P. M. Doran, Conversations with Cézanne, vol. Documents of twentieth-century art. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
[130]
I. Gaskell and S. Kemal, The Language of art history, vol. Cambridge studies in philosophy and the arts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
[131]
R. Shiff, Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory,  technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.
[132]
P. Cézanne, T. Reff, W. Rubin, and Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.), Cézanne: the late work. London: Thames and Hudson, 1978.
[133]
E. Loran and P. Cézanne, Cézanne’s composition: analysis of his form with diagrams and photographs of his motifs, 3rd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2006.
[134]
P. Cézanne, P. Cézanne, P. Smith, N. M. Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, and Art Gallery of Hamilton, The world is an apple: the still lifes of Paul Cézanne. [Hamilton, Ontario]: Art Gallery of Hamilton in association with D Giles Limited, 2014.
[135]
Paul Smith, ‘’Joachim Gasquet, Virgil and Cézanne’s Landscape: “My Beloved Golden Age”’, Apollo, vol. 147, no. 147, pp. 11–23.
[136]
N. M. Athanassoglou-Kallmyer and P. Cézanne, Cézanne and Provence: the painter in his culture. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2003.
[137]
T. J. Clark, ‘Freud’s Cézanne’, Representations, no. 52, pp. 94–122, Oct. 1995, doi: 10.2307/2928701.
[138]
Tamar Garb, ‘Visuality and Sexuality in Cézanne’s Late Bathers’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 46–60, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360728?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[139]
Mary Louise Krumrine, ‘Cézanne’s “Restricted Power”: Further Reflections on the “Bathers”’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 134, no. 1074, pp. 586–595, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/885313?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[140]
T. Reff, ‘Cezanne, Flaubert, St. Anthony, and the Queen of Sheba’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 2, Jun. 1962, doi: 10.2307/3047999.
[141]
P. Arbiter, ‘A Degenerate Work of Art: “The Bathers” by Cézanne’, The Art World, vol. 3, no. 4, 1918, doi: 10.2307/25588292.
[142]
Mary Louise Krumrine, Paul Cézanne. London: Thames and Hudson in association with Kunstmuseum Basel, 1990.
[143]
A. D’Souza, Cézanne’s bathers: biography and the erotics of paint, vol. Refiguring modernism. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2008.
[144]
S. Geist, Interpreting Cézanne. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1988.
[145]
Seurat Re-viewed (Refiguring Modernism) (2010-04-30). Penn State University Press (2010-04-30), 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seurat-Re-viewed-Refiguring-Modernism-2010-04-30/dp/B01A64HFDE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459870139&sr=1-1&keywords=Seurat+Re-Viewed
[146]
Linda Goddard, ‘“The Writings of a Savage?” Literary Strategies in Paul Gauguin’s “Noa Noa”’, Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes, vol. 71, pp. 277–293, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20462786?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[147]
W. Steiner, ‘Divide and narrate: the icon-symbol tension in Seurat’, Word & Image, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 342–348, Oct. 1986, doi: 10.1080/02666286.1986.10435358.
[148]
P. Smith and G. Seurat, Seurat and the avant-garde. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1997.
[149]
G. Seurat and G. Kahn, The drawings of Georges Seurat. New York: Dover Publications, 1971.
[150]
J. U. Halperin, Félix Fénéon: aesthete & anarchist in fin-de-siècle Paris. New Haven, (Conn.): Yale University Press, 1988.
[151]
W. I. Homer, Seurat and the science of painting. [S.l.]: M.I.T. Press, 1964.
[152]
G. Seurat, R. L. Herbert, F. Cachin, G. Tinterow, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), and Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), Seurat: Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, Paris, 9 avril-12  août1991. Paris: Éditions de la Reunion des musées nationaux, 1991.
[153]
N. Broude, Seurat in perspective, vol. The artists in perspective series. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1978.
[154]
J. House, ‘MEANING IN SEURAT’S FIGURE PAINTINGS’, Art History, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 345–356, Sep. 1980, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1980.tb00082.x.
[155]
S. H. Clayson, ‘The Family and the Father: The “Grande Jatte” and Its Absences’, Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, 1989, doi: 10.2307/4108748.
[156]
L. Nochlin, ‘Seurat’s Grande Jatte: An Anti-Utopian Allegory’, Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, 1989, doi: 10.2307/4108747.
[157]
J. Stumpel, ‘The “Grande Jatte,” That Patient Tapestry’, Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art, vol. 14, no. 3/4, 1984, doi: 10.2307/3780578.
[158]
R. L. Herbert, N. Harris, G. Seurat, and Art Institute of Chicago, Seurat: and the making of La Grande Jatte. Chicago, Ill: The Art Institute of Chicago in association with University of California Press, 2004.
[159]
Museum of Fine Arts, ‘Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? | Museum of Fine Arts, Boston’. [Online]. Available: http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/where-do-we-come-from-what-are-we-where-are-we-going-32558
[160]
M. A. Cheetham, ‘Mystical Memories: Gauguin’s Neoplatonism and “Abstraction” in Late-Nineteenth-Century French Painting’, Art Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, Spring 1987, doi: 10.2307/776838.
[161]
Edward D. Powers, ‘From Eternity to Here: Paul Gauguin and the Word Made Flesh’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 89–106, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3600479?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[162]
Bengt Danielsson, ‘Gauguin’s Tahitian Titles’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 109, no. 769, pp. 228–233, 1967 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875243?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[163]
M. H. III, ‘The Origin of Paul Gauguin’s Vision after the Sermon: Jacob Wrestling with the Angel (1888)’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 59, no. 3, Sep. 1977, doi: 10.2307/3049673.
[164]
V. Jirat-Wasiutynski, ‘Paul Gauguin’s “Self-Portrait with Halo and Snake”: The Artist as Initiate and Magus’, Art Journal, vol. 46, no. 1, Spring 1987, doi: 10.2307/776839.
[165]
Ziva Amishai-Maisels, ‘Gauguin’s “Philosophical Eve”’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 115, no. 843, pp. 373–382, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/877381?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[166]
S. Eisenman, Gauguin’s skirt. London: Thames and Hudson, 1997.
[167]
B. Thomson, Gauguin, vol. World of art. New York, N.Y.: Thames and Hudson, 2001.
[168]
V. Jirat-Wasiutyński, P. Gauguin, and H. T. Newton, Technique and meaning in the paintings of Paul Gauguin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[169]
Wayne V. Andersen, ‘Gauguin and a Peruvian Mummy’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 109, no. 769, pp. 238–243, 1967 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[170]
G. T. M. Shackelford, P. Gauguin, and Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, Paul Gauguin: Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Boston: MFA publications, Museum of Fine Arts, 2013.
[171]
A. Murray, ‘“STRANGE AND SUBTLE PERSPECTIVE …”: Van Gogh, The Hague School and the Dutch Landscape Tradition’, Art History, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 410–424, Dec. 1980, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1980.tb00086.x.
[172]
A. Wright, ‘Arche-tectures: Matisse and the End of (Art) History’, October, vol. 84, Spring 1998, doi: 10.2307/779208.
[173]
‘The letters - Vincent van Gogh Letters’. [Online]. Available: http://vangoghletters.org/vg/letters.html
[174]
J. Sund, ‘FAVOURED FICTIONS: WOMEN AND BOOKS IN THE ART OF VAN GOGH’, Art History, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 255–267, Jun. 1988, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1988.tb00298.x.
[175]
C. Zemel, ‘SORROWING WOMEN, RESCUING MEN: VAN GOGH’S IMAGES OF WOMEN AND FAMILY’, Art History, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 351–368, Sep. 1987, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8365.1987.tb00261.x.
[176]
T. Kodera, ‘Japan as Primitivistic Utopia: Van Gogh’s Japonisme Portraits’, Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art, vol. 14, no. 3/4, 1984, doi: 10.2307/3780577.
[177]
Loretta S. Loftus and Wilfred Niels Arnold, ‘Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness: Acute Intermittent Porphyria?’, BMJ: British Medical Journal, vol. 303, no. 6817, pp. 1589–1591, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/29714050?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[178]
Kay Redfield Jamison and Richard Jed Wyatt, ‘Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness’, BMJ: British Medical Journal, vol. 304, no. 6826, 6826 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/29714734?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:6826&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:09598138&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:577&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:304&searchText=AND&searchText=year:1992&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A6826%2BAND%2Bsn%253A09598138%2BAND%2Bsp%253A577%2BAND%2Bvo%253A304%2BAND%2Byear%253A1992%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[179]
M. A. McQuillan and V. van Gogh, Van Gogh, vol. World of art. New York, N.Y.: Thames and Hudson, 2005.
[180]
L. Nochlin, Impressionism and post-impressionism, 1874-1904: sources and  documents, vol. Sources and documents in the history of art series. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.
[181]
J. Hulsker, J. Hulsker, and J. M. Miller, Vincent and Theo van Gogh: a dual biography. Ann Arbor: Fuller Publications, 1990.
[182]
V. van Gogh, R. Pickvance, and Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.), Van Gogh in Arles. New York: Metropolitan Museum of Art, 1984.
[183]
R. Thomson, R. Thomson, and National Gallery of Scotland, Framing France: the representation of landscape in France, 1870-1914. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1998.
[184]
T. Kōdera and Y. Rosenberg, The Mythology of Vincent Van Gogh. Tokyo: TV Asahi, 1993.
[185]
D. W. Druick, P. Zegers, B. Salvesen, Art Institute of Chicago, and Rijksmuseum (Netherlands), Van Gogh and Gauguin: the studio of the south. London: Thames & Hudson, 2001.
[186]
M. W. Roskill, Van Gogh, Gauguin and the Impressionist circle, vol. New aspects of art. London: Thames and Hudson.
[187]
D. Silverman, Van Gogh and Gauguin: the search for sacred art. New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 2001.
[188]
R. Benjamin, Orientalist aesthetics: art, colonialism, and French North Africa,  1880-1930. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2003.
[189]
Y.-A. Bois and G. Sims, ‘On Matisse: The Blinding: For Leo Steinberg’, October, vol. 68, Spring 1994, doi: 10.2307/778697.
[190]
D. Carrier, ‘The Beauty of Henri Matisse’, Journal of Aesthetic Education, vol. 38, no. 2, Summer 2004, doi: 10.2307/3527318.
[191]
John Tchalenko, ‘Henri Matisse Drawing: An Eye-Hand Interaction Study Based on Archival Film’, Leonardo, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 433–438, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40540062?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[192]
H. Matisse and J. D. Flam, Matisse on art. New York: Phaidon, 1973.
[193]
Roger Benjamin, Matisse’s ‘Notes of a painter’. Ann Arbor, Mich: UMI Research Press, 1987.
[194]
C. Bock-Weiss and H. Matisse, Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009.
[195]
A. Wright, Matisse and the subject of modernism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2004.
[196]
J. D. Flam and H. Matisse, Matisse: the man and his art, 1869-1918. London: Thames and Hudson, 1986.
[197]
J. D. Herbert, Fauve painting: the making of cultural politics. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1992.
[198]
M. Werth, The joy of life: the idyllic in French art, circa 1900. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002.
[199]
C. Bock-Weiss and H. Matisse, Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2009.
[200]
C. C. Bock, ‘Henri Matisse’s “Bathers by a River”’, Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, vol. 16, no. 1, 1990, doi: 10.2307/4101568.
[201]
R. R. Brettell and V. Gogh, ‘Van Gogh’s “Bedrooms at Arles”: The Problem of Priority’, Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, 1986, doi: 10.2307/4115938.
[202]
P. A. Heelan, ‘Toward a New Analysis of the Pictorial Space of Vincent Van Gogh’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 54, no. 4, Dec. 1972, doi: 10.2307/3049037.
[203]
J. L. Ward, ‘A Reexamination of Van Gogh’s Pictorial Space’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 58, no. 4, Dec. 1976, doi: 10.2307/3049573.
[204]
Y.-A. Bois and K. Streip, ‘Kahnweiler’s Lesson’, Representations, no. 18, pp. 33–68, Apr. 1987, doi: 10.2307/3043750.
[205]
P. Leighten, ‘Revising Cubism’, Art Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, Winter 1988, doi: 10.2307/776977.
[206]
Patricia Leighten, ‘Cubist Anachronisms: Ahistoricity, Cryptoformalism, and Business-as-Usual in New York’, Oxford Art Journal, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 91–102, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[207]
R. M. Antliff, ‘Bergson and Cubism: A Reassessment’, Art Journal, vol. 47, no. 4, Winter 1988, doi: 10.2307/776983.
[208]
L. Zelevansky, Picasso and Braque: a symposium. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1992.
[209]
T. J. Clark and P. Picasso, Picasso and truth: from cubism to Guernica, vol. Bollingen series. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2013.
[210]
L. Zelevansky, Picasso and Braque: a symposium. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1992.
[211]
P. Karmel, Picasso and the invention of Cubism. New Haven, [Conn.]: Yale University Press, 2003.
[212]
N. Cox, Cubism, vol. Art&ideas. London: Phaidon Press Limited, 2000.
[213]
C. Poggi, In defiance of painting: cubism, futurism, and the invention of  collage, vol. Yale publications in the history of art. New Haven [Conn.]: Yale University Press, 1992.
[214]
P. D. Leighten, Re-ordering the universe: Picasso and anarchism, 1897-1914. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1989.
[215]
J. Golding, Cubism: a history and an analysis, 1907-1914. London: Faber, 1959.
[216]
G. Braque, J. Golding, S. Bowness, South Bank Centre, Walker Art Gallery, and City of Bristol Museum and Art Gallery, Braque: still lifes and interiors : a South Bank Centre touring  exhibition. London: South Bank Centre, 1990.
[217]
William Cloonan, ‘Braque’s Le Portugais and a Portuguese Nun’, The French Review, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 607–616, 1990 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/396012?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[218]
E. Kahng, Kimbell Art Museum, and Santa Barbara Museum of Art, Picasso and Braque: the Cubist experiment, 1910-1912. Santa Barbara, Calif: Santa Barbara Museum of Art, 2011.
[219]
W. Rubin and Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.), Picasso and Braque: pioneering cubism. New York: Museum of Modern Art, 1989.
[220]
E. B. Mullins and G. Braque, Braque, vol. World of art library. London: Thames and Hudson, 1968.
[221]
L. Steinberg, ‘The Philosophical Brothel’, October, vol. 44, Spring 1988, doi: 10.2307/778974.
[222]
John Golding, ‘The “Demoiselles d’Avignon”’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 100, no. 662, pp. 154–163, 1958 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/872425?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[223]
W. Rubin, ‘From Narrative to “Iconic” in Picasso: The Buried Allegory in Bread and Fruitdish on a Table and the Role of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 65, no. 4, Dec. 1983, doi: 10.2307/3050371.
[224]
L. D. Steefel, ‘The Neglected Fruit Cluster in Picasso’s “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon”’, Artibus et Historiae, vol. 13, no. 26, 1992, doi: 10.2307/1483434.
[225]
A. C. Chave, ‘New Encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon: Gender, Race, and the Origins of Cubism’, The Art Bulletin, vol. 76, no. 4, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.2307/3046058.
[226]
B. Martensen-Larsen, ‘When Did Picasso Complete “Les Demoiselles d’Avignon”?’, Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte, vol. 48, no. 2, 1985, doi: 10.2307/1482281.
[227]
R. Penrose, J. Golding, and D. H. Kahnweiler, Picasso in retrospect. London: Granada, 1981.