1
Smith P, Wilde C. A companion to art theory. Oxford: : Blackwell 2002. http://0-onlinelibrary.Wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470998434
2
Francis Frascina. Institutions, Culture, and America’s ‘Cold War Years’: The Making of Greenberg’s ‘Modernist Painting’. Oxford Art Journal 2003;26:71–97.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3600447?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
3
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire, Manet, and Modernity. The Modern Language Review 1992;87. doi:10.2307/3732920
4
Meyer Shapiro. ‘The nature of Abstract Art’. Marxist quarterly;1:77–98.https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=’The+nature+of+Abstract+Art’&title=Marxist+quarterly&aufirst=Meyer+Shapiro&auinit=&aulast=&issn=&eissn=&coden=&volume=1&issue=1&spage=77&epage=98&quarter=&ssn=&date=Jan+&sid=&reqtype3
5
Frascina F, Harrison C, Paul D, et al. Modern art and modernism: a critical anthology. London: : Paul Chapman in association with the Open University 1988.
6
Harrison C, Wood P. Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Oxford: : Blackwell 1992.
7
Clement Greenberg,. ‘Avant-Garde and Kitsch’. Partisan review;VI:34–49.
8
T. J. Clark. Clement Greenberg’s Theory of Art. Critical Inquiry 1982;9:139–56.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343277?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
9
T. J. Clark. A Bourgeois Dance of Death: Max Buchon on Courbet-I. The Burlington Magazine 1969;111:208–13.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875972?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
10
Michael Fried. Painter into Painting: On Courbet’s ‘After Dinner at Ornans’ and ‘Stonebreakers’. Critical Inquiry 1982;8:619–49.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343190?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
11
Alan Bowness. Courbet’s Proudhon. The Burlington Magazine 1978;120:123–30.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/879130?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
12
Bowness A, Courbet G. Courbet’s L’Atelier du peintre. Newcastle upon Tyne: : University of Newcastle upon Tyne 1972.
13
Nochlin L. Gustave Courbet’s Meeting: A Portrait of the Artist as a Wandering Jew. The Art Bulletin 1967;49. doi:10.2307/3048470
14
Ting Chang. ‘The Meeting’: Gustave Courbet and Alfred Bruyas. The Burlington Magazine 1996;138:586–91.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/887242?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
15
Chu P ten-Doesschate. Courbet in perspective. Englewood Cliffs: : Prentice-Hall 1977.
16
Clark TJ. The absolute bourgeois: artists and politics in France, 1848-1851. London: : Thames and Hudson 1973.
17
Clark TJ. Image of the people: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 revolution. London: : Thames and Hudson 1973.
18
Crapo PB. The Problematics of Artistic Patronage under the Second Empire: Gustave Courbet’s Involved Relations with the Regime of Napoleon III. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 1995;58. doi:10.2307/1482704
19
Frédérique Desbuissons. Courbet’s Materialism. Oxford Art Journal 2008;31:253–60.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20108023?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
20
Faunce S, Nochlin L, Courbet G, et al. Courbet reconsidered. [New York]: : Brooklyn Museum 1988.
21
Michael Fried. The Structure of Beholding in Courbet’s ‘Burial at Ornans’. Critical Inquiry 1983;9:635–83.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343377?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
22
Michael Fried. Manet in His Generation: The Face of Painting in the 1860s. Critical Inquiry 1992;19:22–69.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343753?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
23
Fried M, Courbet G. Courbet’s realism. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1990.
24
Fried M. Manet’s modernism, or, The face of painting in the 1860s. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996.
25
Herding K. Courbet: to venture independence. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1991.
26
Lesko D. From Genre to Allegory in Gustave Courbet’s Les Demoiselles de Village. Art Journal 1979;38. doi:10.2307/776270
27
Moffitt JF. Art and Politics: An Underlying Pictorial - Political Topos in Courbet’s ‘Real Allegory’. Artibus et Historiae 1987;8. doi:10.2307/1483277
28
Nicolson B. Courbet, The studio of the painter. New York: : Viking Press
29
Przyblyski JM. Courbet, the Commune, and the Meanings of Still Life in 1871. Art Journal 1996;55. doi:10.2307/777743
30
Rubin JH. Realism and social vision in Courbet & Proudhon. Princeton: : Princeton University Press 1980.
31
Nochlin L. Realism. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1990.
32
Seibert MA. A Political and a Pictorial Tradition Used in Gustave Courbet’s Real Allegory. The Art Bulletin 1983;65. doi:10.2307/3050325
33
Smith P. Manet Bits. Art History 1997;20:477–82. doi:10.1111/1467-8365.00072
34
Toussaint H, Courbet G, Réunion des musées nationaux (France), et al. Gustave Courbet: 1819-1877 , (exposition organisée par la Réunion des musées nationaux et l’Arts Council of Great Britain), Grand Palais, 30 septembre 1977-2 janvier 1978 , (catalogue. Paris: : Ministère de la culture et de l’environnement, Éditions des musées nationaux 1977.
35
Weisberg GP, Cleveland Museum of Art. The realist tradition: French painting and drawing, 1830-1900. Cleveland, Ohio: : Cleveland Museum of Art
36
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1999.
37
Is Paris Still the Capital of the Nineteenth Century?: Essays on Art and Modernity, 1850-1900. Routledge 26AD. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Paris-Still-Capital-Nineteenth-Century/dp/1472460146
38
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1999.
39
Hiddleston JA. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Oxford: : Clarendon 1999. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198159322.001.0001
40
Richard Shiff. Handling Shocks: On the Representation of Experience in Walter Benjamin’s Analogies. Oxford Art Journal 1992;15:88–103.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360503?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
41
Hobbs R. Impressions of French modernity: art and literature in France, 1850-1900. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1998.
42
Tom McDonough. The Crimes of the Flaneur. October 2002;102:101–22.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/779133?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
43
Herbert RL. Impressionism: art, leisure and Parisian society. New Haven, Conn: : Yale University Press 1988.
44
André Dombrowski. History, Memory, and Instantaneity in Edgar Degas’s ‘Place de la Concorde’. The Art Bulletin 2011;93:195–219.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/23046593?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
45
Burton R. ‘The Unseen Seer, or Proteus in the City: Aspects of a Nineteenth-Century Parisian Myth’. French studies 1988;XLll:50–68.
46
Benjamin AE. The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin. London: : Routledge 1989.
47
Benjamin AE. The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin. London: : Routledge 1989.
48
Smith G. On Walter Benjamin: critical essays and recollections. 1st MIT Press paperback ed. Cambridge, Mass: : MIT Press 1991.
49
Prendergast C. Paris and the nineteenth century. Oxford: : Blackwell 1992.
50
Harrison C, Wood P. Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Oxford: : Blackwell 1992.
51
Michael Fried. Painting Memories: On the Containment of the past in Baudelaire and Manet. Critical Inquiry 1984;10:510–42.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1343305?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
52
Locke N. Unfinished Homage: Manet’s ‘Burial’ and Baudelaire. The Art Bulletin 2000;82. doi:10.2307/3051365
53
Collins BR. Manet’s Luncheon in the Studio: An Homage to Baudelaire. Art Journal 1978;38. doi:10.2307/776419
54
Juliet Wilson Bareau. The Hidden Face of Manet. An Investigation of the Artist’s Working Processes [Exhibition Catalog]. The Burlington Magazine 1986;128.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/882487?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:997&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:00076287&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:i&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:128&searchText=AND&searchText=year:1986&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A997%2BAND%2Bsn%253A00076287%2BAND%2Bsp%253Ai%2BAND%2Bvo%253A128%2BAND%2Byear%253A1986%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
55
Armstrong CM. Manet Manette. New Haven: : Yale University Press 2002.
56
Rubin JH. Manet’s silence and the poetics of bouquets. London: : Reaktion 1994.
57
Clark TJ. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his followers. London: : Thames and Hudson 1985.
58
Mauner GL. Manet, peintre-philosophe: a study of the painter’s themes. University Park: : Pennsylvania State University Press 1975.
59
Locke N. Manet and the family romance. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2001.
60
Hanson AC. Manet and the modern tradition. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1977.
61
Clark TJ. Preliminaries to a Possible Treatment of ‘Olympia’ in 1865. Screen 1980;21:18–42. doi:10.1093/screen/21.1.18
62
More on a Name: Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and the Defiant Heroine in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/eds/C__S%27More%20on%20a%20Name%3A%20Manet%27s%20%E2%80%98Olympia%E2%80%99%20and%20the%20Defiant%20Heroine%20in%20Mid-Nineteenth-Century%20France%27__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
63
Reff T, Manet É. Manet - ‘Olympia’. London: : Allen Lane 1976.
64
Clark TJ. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his followers. London: : Thames and Hudson 1985.
65
Lipton E. Alias Olympia: a woman’s search for Manet’s notorious model & her own desire. London: : Thames and Hudson 1993.
66
Friedrich O. Olympia: Paris in the age of Manet. London: : Aurum Press 1992.
67
Thierry de Duve and Brian Holmes. How Manet’s ‘A Bar at the Folies-Bergère’ Is Constructed. Critical Inquiry 1998;25:136–68.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1344137?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
68
Iskin RE. Selling, Seduction, and Soliciting the Eye: Manet’s Bar at the Folies-Bergere. The Art Bulletin 1995;77. doi:10.2307/3046078
69
Boime A. Manet’s ‘Un bar aux Folies-Bergere’ as an Allegory of Nostalgia. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 1993;56. doi:10.2307/1482637
70
Carrier D. Art History in the Mirror Stage: Interpreting un Bar aux Folies Bergeres. History and Theory 1990;29. doi:10.2307/2505053
71
Collins BR. 12 Views of Manet’s Bar. Chichester: : Princeton University Press 1996.
72
Isaacson J. Constable, Duranty, Mallarme, Impressionism, Plein Air, and Forgetting. The Art Bulletin 1994;76. doi:10.2307/3046037
73
Smith P. ‘PARBLEU’: PISSARRO AND THE POLITICAL COLOUR OF AN ORIGINAL VISION. Art History 1992;15:223–47. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1992.tb00482.x
74
Shiff R. Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory, technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1984.
75
Rewald J, Weitzenhoffer F. Aspects of Monet: a symposium on the artist’s life and times. New York: : Abrams 1984.
76
Lewis MT. Critical readings in Impressionism and post-Impressionism: an anthology. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2007.
77
House J. Impressionism: paint and politics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 2004.
78
Berson R, Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco. The New painting: impressionism, 1874-1886 : documentation. San Francisco, CA: : Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco 1989.
79
Rewald J. The history of impressionism. Rev. and enl. ed. New York: : Museum of Modern Art 1961.
80
Ward M. Pissarro, Neo-impressionism, and the spaces of the avant-garde. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1996.
81
Special Issue: Pissarro. Apollo;136.
82
Pissarro C, Brettell RR, Pissarro J, et al. The impressionist and the city: Pissarro’s series paintings. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1992.
83
Thomson R, Birmingham City Museum and Art Gallery, Burrell Collection. Camille Pissarro: Impressionism, landscape and rural labour. London: : Herbert Press 1990.
84
Lloyd C. Studies on Camille Pissarro. London: : Routledge & Kegan Paul 1986.
85
Pissarro C, Hayward Gallery, Galeries nationales du Grand Palais (France), et al. Pissarro: Camille Pissarro 1830-1903. (London): : Arts Council of Great Britain 1980.
86
House J, Monet C. Monet: nature into art. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1986.
87
Kear J. MAKING HAY WITH MONET: MONETS OF THE ′90s. Art History 1991;14:593–9. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1991.tb00459.x
88
Brettell RR. Monet’s Haystacks Reconsidered. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies 1984;11. doi:10.2307/4115885
89
John Klein. The Dispersal of the Modernist Series. Oxford Art Journal 1998;21:123–35.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360700?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
90
Levine SZ. Monet’s Series: Repetition, Obsession. October 1986;37. doi:10.2307/778519
91
Impressionism : beneath the surface / Paul Smith. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SImpressionism%3A%20Beneath%20the%20Surface%20__Orightresult?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
92
Spate V, Monet C. The colour of time: Claude Monet. London: : Thames and Hudson 1992.
93
Tucker PH, Monet C, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston, et al. Monet in the ’90s: the series paintings. 4th printing with corrections. Boston: : Museum of Fine Arts 1990.
94
Pollock, Griselda. Vision and difference. London: : Routledge
95
Garb T. ‘L’ART FÉMININ’: THE FORMATION OF A CRITICAL CATEGORY IN LATE NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE. Art History 1989;12:39–65. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1989.tb00336.x
96
Broude N. Degas’s ‘Misogyny’. The Art Bulletin 1977;59. doi:10.2307/3049600
97
KATHRYN BROWN. The Aesthetics of Presence: Looking at Degas’s ‘Bathers’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 2010;68:331–41.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40929541?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
98
Harrison C. Painting the difference: sex and spectator in modern art. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 2005.
99
Broude N. Edgar Degas and French Feminism, ca. 1880: ‘The Young Spartans,’ the Brothel Monotypes, and the Bathers Revisited. The Art Bulletin 1988;70. doi:10.2307/3051106
100
Marilyn R. Brown. ‘Miss La La’s’ Teeth: Reflections on Degas and ‘Race’. The Art Bulletin 2007;89:738–65.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25067359?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
101
Frascina F. Modernity and modernism: French painting in the nineteenth century. New Haven: : Yale University Press, in association with the Open University 1993.
102
Sidlauskas S. Resisting Narrative: The Problem of Edgar Degas’s Interior. The Art Bulletin 1993;75. doi:10.2307/3045989
103
Elizabeth Easton and Jared Bark. ‘Pictures Properly Framed’: Degas and Innovation in Impressionist Frames. The Burlington Magazine 2008;150:603–11.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40479868?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
104
Richard Kendall. Degas and the Contingency of Vision. The Burlington Magazine 1988;130:180–216.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/883345?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
105
Reff T. The Technical Aspects of Degas’s Art. Metropolitan Museum Journal 1971;4:141–66. doi:10.2307/1512619
106
Armstrong CM. Odd man out: readings of the work and reputation of Edgar Degas. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1991.
107
Pollock G, Kendall R. Dealing with Degas: representations of women and the politics of vision. London: : Pandora 1992.
108
Lipton E, Degas E. Looking into Degas: uneasy images of women and modern life. Berkeley: : University of California Press 1986.
109
Callen A. The spectacular body: science, method and meaning in the work of Degas. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1995.
110
Reff T. Degas, the artist’s mind. London: : Thames and Hudson 1976.
111
Thomson R, Degas E. Degas: the nudes. London: : Thames and Hudson 1988.
112
Kessler MR. Unmasking Manet’s Morisot. The Art Bulletin 1999;81. doi:10.2307/3051353
113
Broude N. Mary Cassatt: Modern Woman or the Cult of True Womanhood? Woman’s Art Journal 2000;21. doi:10.2307/1358749
114
Yeh SF. Mary Cassatt’s Images of Women. Art Journal 1976;35. doi:10.2307/776228
115
Impressionism: A Feminist Reading: The Gendering Of Art, Science, And Nature In The Nineteenth Century by Broude, Norma (1997) Paperback. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Impressionism-Feminist-Gendering-Nineteenth-Paperback/dp/B01071FG2I/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459857940&sr=1-1&keywords=%2C+Impressionism%3A+a+Feminist+Reading
116
Broude N. Impressionism: a feminist reading ; the gendering of art, science, and nature in the nineteenth century. New York: : Rizzoli 1991.
117
Garb T. Bodies of modernity: figure and flesh in fin-de-siècle France. London: : Thames & Hudson 1998.
118
Pollock G, Cassatt M. Mary Cassatt: painter of modern women. London: : Thames & Hudson 1998.
119
Jill DeVonyar and Richard Kendall. The Class of 1881: Degas, Drawing, and the ‘Little Dancer Aged Fourteen’. Master Drawings 2003;41:151–62.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1554585?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
120
Daphne S. Barbour. Degas’s Wax Sculptures from the inside out. The Burlington Magazine 1992;134:798–805.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/885352?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
121
Kendall R, Joslyn Art Museum. Degas and the little dancer. New Haven: : Yale University Press in association with Joslyn Art Museum, Omaha 1998.
122
June Hargrove. ‘Degas’s Little dancer in the world of pantomime’. Apollo;147:15–21.
123
Czestochowski JS, Pingeot A. Degas sculptures: catalogue raisonné of the bronzes. New York: : Torch Press 2002.
124
Shiff R. Constructing Physicality. Art Journal 1991;50. doi:10.2307/777084
125
Smith P. Cézanne’s "Primitive” Perspective, or the "View from Everywhere”. The Art Bulletin 2013;95:102–19. doi:10.1080/00043079.2013.10786108
126
Richard Shiff. Seeing Cézanne. Critical Inquiry 1978;4:769–808.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1342954?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
127
Bois Y-A, Krauss R. Cezanne: Words and Deeds. October 1998;84. doi:10.2307/779207
128
Value, art, politics. Liverpool: : Liverpool University Press 2007.
129
Cézanne P, Doran PM. Conversations with Cézanne. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2001.
130
Gaskell I, Kemal S. The Language of art history. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1991.
131
Shiff R. Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory, technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. Chicago: : University of Chicago Press 1984.
132
Cézanne P, Reff T, Rubin W, et al. Cézanne: the late work. London: : Thames and Hudson 1978.
133
Loran E, Cézanne P. Cézanne’s composition: analysis of his form with diagrams and photographs of his motifs. 3rd ed. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2006.
134
Cézanne P, Cézanne P, Smith P, et al. The world is an apple: the still lifes of Paul Cézanne. [Hamilton, Ontario]: : Art Gallery of Hamilton in association with D Giles Limited 2014.
135
Paul Smith,. ’Joachim Gasquet, Virgil and Cézanne’s Landscape: ‘My Beloved Golden Age’. Apollo;147:11–23.
136
Athanassoglou-Kallmyer NM, Cézanne P. Cézanne and Provence: the painter in his culture. Chicago: : The University of Chicago Press 2003.
137
Clark TJ. Freud’s Cézanne. Representations 1995;:94–122. doi:10.2307/2928701
138
Tamar Garb. Visuality and Sexuality in Cézanne’s Late Bathers. Oxford Art Journal 1996;19:46–60.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360728?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
139
Mary Louise Krumrine. Cézanne’s ‘Restricted Power’: Further Reflections on the ‘Bathers’. The Burlington Magazine 1992;134:586–95.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/885313?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
140
Reff T. Cezanne, Flaubert, St. Anthony, and the Queen of Sheba. The Art Bulletin 1962;44. doi:10.2307/3047999
141
Arbiter P. A Degenerate Work of Art: ‘The Bathers’ by Cézanne. The Art World 1918;3. doi:10.2307/25588292
142
Mary Louise Krumrine. Paul Cézanne. London: : Thames and Hudson in association with Kunstmuseum Basel 1990.
143
D’Souza A. Cézanne’s bathers: biography and the erotics of paint. University Park, Pa: : Pennsylvania State University Press 2008.
144
Geist S. Interpreting Cézanne. Cambridge, Mass: : Harvard University Press 1988.
145
Seurat Re-viewed (Refiguring Modernism) (2010-04-30). Penn State University Press (2010-04-30) 2010. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Seurat-Re-viewed-Refiguring-Modernism-2010-04-30/dp/B01A64HFDE/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1459870139&sr=1-1&keywords=Seurat+Re-Viewed
146
Linda Goddard. ‘The Writings of a Savage?’ Literary Strategies in Paul Gauguin’s “Noa Noa”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 2008;71:277–93.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20462786?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
147
Steiner W. Divide and narrate: the icon-symbol tension in Seurat. Word & Image 1986;2:342–8. doi:10.1080/02666286.1986.10435358
148
Smith P, Seurat G. Seurat and the avant-garde. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1997.
149
Seurat G, Kahn G. The drawings of Georges Seurat. New York: : Dover Publications 1971.
150
Halperin JU. Félix Fénéon: aesthete & anarchist in fin-de-siècle Paris. New Haven, (Conn.): : Yale University Press 1988.
151
Homer WI. Seurat and the science of painting. [S.l.]: : M.I.T. Press 1964.
152
Seurat G, Herbert RL, Cachin F, et al. Seurat: Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, Paris, 9 avril-12 août1991. Paris: : Éditions de la Reunion des musées nationaux 1991.
153
Broude N. Seurat in perspective. Englewood Cliffs: : Prentice-Hall 1978.
154
House J. MEANING IN SEURAT’S FIGURE PAINTINGS. Art History 1980;3:345–56. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1980.tb00082.x
155
Clayson SH. The Family and the Father: The ‘Grande Jatte’ and Its Absences. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies 1989;14. doi:10.2307/4108748
156
Nochlin L. Seurat’s Grande Jatte: An Anti-Utopian Allegory. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies 1989;14. doi:10.2307/4108747
157
Stumpel J. The ‘Grande Jatte,’ That Patient Tapestry. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 1984;14. doi:10.2307/3780578
158
Herbert RL, Harris N, Seurat G, et al. Seurat: and the making of La Grande Jatte. Chicago, Ill: : The Art Institute of Chicago in association with University of California Press 2004.
159
Museum of Fine Arts. Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? | Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/where-do-we-come-from-what-are-we-where-are-we-going-32558
160
Cheetham MA. Mystical Memories: Gauguin’s Neoplatonism and ‘Abstraction’ in Late-Nineteenth-Century French Painting. Art Journal 1987;46. doi:10.2307/776838
161
Edward D. Powers. From Eternity to Here: Paul Gauguin and the Word Made Flesh. Oxford Art Journal 2002;25:89–106.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3600479?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
162
Bengt Danielsson. Gauguin’s Tahitian Titles. The Burlington Magazine 1967;109:228–33.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875243?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
163
III MH. The Origin of Paul Gauguin’s Vision after the Sermon: Jacob Wrestling with the Angel (1888). The Art Bulletin 1977;59. doi:10.2307/3049673
164
Jirat-Wasiutynski V. Paul Gauguin’s ‘Self-Portrait with Halo and Snake’: The Artist as Initiate and Magus. Art Journal 1987;46. doi:10.2307/776839
165
Ziva Amishai-Maisels. Gauguin’s ‘Philosophical Eve’. The Burlington Magazine 1973;115:373–82.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/877381?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
166
Eisenman S. Gauguin’s skirt. London: : Thames and Hudson 1997.
167
Thomson B. Gauguin. New York, N.Y.: : Thames and Hudson 2001.
168
Jirat-Wasiutyński V, Gauguin P, Newton HT. Technique and meaning in the paintings of Paul Gauguin. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
169
Wayne V. Andersen. Gauguin and a Peruvian Mummy. The Burlington Magazine 1967;109:238–43.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/875245?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
170
Shackelford GTM, Gauguin P, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Paul Gauguin: Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going? Boston: : MFA publications, Museum of Fine Arts 2013.
171
Murray A. ‘STRANGE AND SUBTLE PERSPECTIVE …’: Van Gogh, The Hague School and the Dutch Landscape Tradition. Art History 1980;3:410–24. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1980.tb00086.x
172
Wright A. Arche-tectures: Matisse and the End of (Art) History. October 1998;84. doi:10.2307/779208
173
The letters - Vincent van Gogh Letters. http://vangoghletters.org/vg/letters.html
174
Sund J. FAVOURED FICTIONS: WOMEN AND BOOKS IN THE ART OF VAN GOGH. Art History 1988;11:255–67. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1988.tb00298.x
175
Zemel C. SORROWING WOMEN, RESCUING MEN: VAN GOGH’S IMAGES OF WOMEN AND FAMILY. Art History 1987;10:351–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8365.1987.tb00261.x
176
Kodera T. Japan as Primitivistic Utopia: Van Gogh’s Japonisme Portraits. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art 1984;14. doi:10.2307/3780577
177
Loretta S. Loftus and Wilfred Niels Arnold. Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness: Acute Intermittent Porphyria? BMJ: British Medical Journal 1991;303:1589–91.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/29714050?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
178
Kay Redfield Jamison and Richard Jed Wyatt. Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness. BMJ: British Medical Journal 6826;304.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/29714734?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=no:6826&searchText=AND&searchText=sn:09598138&searchText=AND&searchText=sp:577&searchText=AND&searchText=vo:304&searchText=AND&searchText=year:1992&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dno%253A6826%2BAND%2Bsn%253A09598138%2BAND%2Bsp%253A577%2BAND%2Bvo%253A304%2BAND%2Byear%253A1992%26amp%3Bymod%3DYour%2Binbound%2Blink%2Bdid%2Bnot%2Bhave%2Ban%2Bexact%2Bmatch%2Bin%2Bour%2Bdatabase.%2BBut%2Bbased%2Bon%2Bthe%2Belements%2Bwe%2Bcould%2Bmatch%252C%2Bwe%2Bhave%2Breturned%2Bthe%2Bfollowing%2Bresults.&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
179
McQuillan MA, Gogh V van. Van Gogh. New York, N.Y.: : Thames and Hudson 2005.
180
Nochlin L. Impressionism and post-impressionism, 1874-1904: sources and documents. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: : Prentice-Hall
181
Hulsker J, Hulsker J, Miller JM. Vincent and Theo van Gogh: a dual biography. Ann Arbor: : Fuller Publications 1990.
182
Gogh V van, Pickvance R, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York, N.Y.). Van Gogh in Arles. New York: : Metropolitan Museum of Art 1984.
183
Thomson R, Thomson R, National Gallery of Scotland. Framing France: the representation of landscape in France, 1870-1914. Manchester: : Manchester University Press 1998.
184
Kōdera T, Rosenberg Y. The Mythology of Vincent Van Gogh. Tokyo: : TV Asahi 1993.
185
Druick DW, Zegers P, Salvesen B, et al. Van Gogh and Gauguin: the studio of the south. London: : Thames & Hudson 2001.
186
Roskill MW. Van Gogh, Gauguin and the Impressionist circle. London: : Thames and Hudson
187
Silverman D. Van Gogh and Gauguin: the search for sacred art. New York: : Farrar Straus Giroux 2001.
188
Benjamin R. Orientalist aesthetics: art, colonialism, and French North Africa, 1880-1930. Berkeley, Calif: : University of California Press 2003.
189
Bois Y-A, Sims G. On Matisse: The Blinding: For Leo Steinberg. October 1994;68. doi:10.2307/778697
190
Carrier D. The Beauty of Henri Matisse. Journal of Aesthetic Education 2004;38. doi:10.2307/3527318
191
John Tchalenko. Henri Matisse Drawing: An Eye-Hand Interaction Study Based on Archival Film. Leonardo 2009;42:433–8.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40540062?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
192
Matisse H, Flam JD. Matisse on art. New York: : Phaidon 1973.
193
Roger Benjamin. Matisse’s ‘Notes of a painter’. Ann Arbor, Mich: : UMI Research Press 1987.
194
Bock-Weiss C, Matisse H. Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. University Park, Pa: : Pennsylvania State University Press 2009.
195
Wright A. Matisse and the subject of modernism. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2004.
196
Flam JD, Matisse H. Matisse: the man and his art, 1869-1918. London: : Thames and Hudson 1986.
197
Herbert JD. Fauve painting: the making of cultural politics. New Haven: : Yale University Press 1992.
198
Werth M. The joy of life: the idyllic in French art, circa 1900. Berkeley: : University of California Press 2002.
199
Bock-Weiss C, Matisse H. Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. University Park, Pa: : Pennsylvania State University Press 2009.
200
Bock CC. Henri Matisse’s ‘Bathers by a River’. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies 1990;16. doi:10.2307/4101568
201
Brettell RR, Gogh V. Van Gogh’s ‘Bedrooms at Arles’: The Problem of Priority. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies 1986;12. doi:10.2307/4115938
202
Heelan PA. Toward a New Analysis of the Pictorial Space of Vincent Van Gogh. The Art Bulletin 1972;54. doi:10.2307/3049037
203
Ward JL. A Reexamination of Van Gogh’s Pictorial Space. The Art Bulletin 1976;58. doi:10.2307/3049573
204
Bois Y-A, Streip K. Kahnweiler’s Lesson. Representations 1987;:33–68. doi:10.2307/3043750
205
Leighten P. Revising Cubism. Art Journal 1988;47. doi:10.2307/776977
206
Patricia Leighten. Cubist Anachronisms: Ahistoricity, Cryptoformalism, and Business-as-Usual in New York. Oxford Art Journal 1994;17:91–102.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1360577?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
207
Antliff RM. Bergson and Cubism: A Reassessment. Art Journal 1988;47. doi:10.2307/776983
208
Zelevansky L. Picasso and Braque: a symposium. New York: : Museum of Modern Art 1992.
209
Clark TJ, Picasso P. Picasso and truth: from cubism to Guernica. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 2013.
210
Zelevansky L. Picasso and Braque: a symposium. New York: : Museum of Modern Art 1992.
211
Karmel P. Picasso and the invention of Cubism. New Haven, [Conn.]: : Yale University Press 2003.
212
Cox N. Cubism. London: : Phaidon Press Limited 2000.
213
Poggi C. In defiance of painting: cubism, futurism, and the invention of collage. New Haven [Conn.]: : Yale University Press 1992.
214
Leighten PD. Re-ordering the universe: Picasso and anarchism, 1897-1914. Princeton, N.J.: : Princeton University Press 1989.
215
Golding J. Cubism: a history and an analysis, 1907-1914. London: : Faber 1959.
216
Braque G, Golding J, Bowness S, et al. Braque: still lifes and interiors : a South Bank Centre touring exhibition. London: : South Bank Centre 1990.
217
William Cloonan. Braque’s Le Portugais and a Portuguese Nun. The French Review 1990;63:607–16.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/396012?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
218
Kahng E, Kimbell Art Museum, Santa Barbara Museum of Art. Picasso and Braque: the Cubist experiment, 1910-1912. Santa Barbara, Calif: : Santa Barbara Museum of Art 2011.
219
Rubin W, Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.). Picasso and Braque: pioneering cubism. New York: : Museum of Modern Art 1989.
220
Mullins EB, Braque G. Braque. London: : Thames and Hudson 1968.
221
Steinberg L. The Philosophical Brothel. October 1988;44. doi:10.2307/778974
222
John Golding. The ‘Demoiselles d’Avignon’. The Burlington Magazine 1958;100:154–63.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/872425?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
223
Rubin W. From Narrative to ‘Iconic’ in Picasso: The Buried Allegory in Bread and Fruitdish on a Table and the Role of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. The Art Bulletin 1983;65. doi:10.2307/3050371
224
Steefel LD. The Neglected Fruit Cluster in Picasso’s ‘Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’. Artibus et Historiae 1992;13. doi:10.2307/1483434
225
Chave AC. New Encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon: Gender, Race, and the Origins of Cubism. The Art Bulletin 1994;76. doi:10.2307/3046058
226
Martensen-Larsen B. When Did Picasso Complete ‘Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’? Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte 1985;48. doi:10.2307/1482281
227
Penrose R, Golding J, Kahnweiler DH. Picasso in retrospect. London: : Granada 1981.
