[1]
Alan Bowness 1978. Courbet’s Proudhon. The Burlington Magazine. 120, 900 (1978), 123–130.
[2]
André Dombrowski 2011. History, Memory, and Instantaneity in Edgar Degas’s ‘Place de la Concorde’. The Art Bulletin. 93, 2 (2011), 195–219.
[3]
Antliff, R.M. 1988. Bergson and Cubism: A Reassessment. Art Journal. 47, 4 (Winter 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776983.
[4]
Arbiter, P. 1918. A Degenerate Work of Art: ‘The Bathers’ by Cézanne. The Art World. 3, 4 (1918). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/25588292.
[5]
Armstrong, C.M. 2002. Manet Manette. Yale University Press.
[6]
Armstrong, C.M. 1991. Odd man out: readings of the work and reputation of Edgar Degas. University of Chicago Press.
[7]
Athanassoglou-Kallmyer, N.M. and Cézanne, P. 2003. Cézanne and Provence: the painter in his culture. The University of Chicago Press.
[8]
Bengt Danielsson 1967. Gauguin’s Tahitian Titles. The Burlington Magazine. 109, 769 (1967), 228–233.
[9]
Benjamin, A.E. 1989. The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin. Routledge.
[10]
Benjamin, A.E. 1989. The problems of modernity: Adorno and Benjamin. Routledge.
[11]
Benjamin, R. 2003. Orientalist aesthetics: art, colonialism, and French North Africa,  1880-1930. University of California Press.
[12]
Berson, R. and Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco 1989. The New painting: impressionism, 1874-1886 : documentation. Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco.
[13]
Bock, C.C. 1990. Henri Matisse’s ‘Bathers by a River’. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 16, 1 (1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/4101568.
[14]
Bock-Weiss, C. and Matisse, H. 2009. Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[15]
Bock-Weiss, C. and Matisse, H. 2009. Henri Matisse: modernist against the grain. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[16]
Boime, A. 1993. Manet’s ‘Un bar aux Folies-Bergere’ as an Allegory of Nostalgia. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 56, 2 (1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1482637.
[17]
Bois, Y.-A. and Krauss, R. 1998. Cezanne: Words and Deeds. October. 84, (Spring 1998). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/779207.
[18]
Bois, Y.-A. and Sims, G. 1994. On Matisse: The Blinding: For Leo Steinberg. October. 68, (Spring 1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/778697.
[19]
Bois, Y.-A. and Streip, K. 1987. Kahnweiler’s Lesson. Representations. 18 (Apr. 1987), 33–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3043750.
[20]
Bowness, A. and Courbet, G. 1972. Courbet’s L’Atelier du peintre. University of Newcastle upon Tyne.
[21]
Braque, G. et al. 1990. Braque: still lifes and interiors : a South Bank Centre touring  exhibition. South Bank Centre.
[22]
Brettell, R.R. 1984. Monet’s Haystacks Reconsidered. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 11, 1 (Autumn 1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/4115885.
[23]
Brettell, R.R. and Gogh, V. 1986. Van Gogh’s ‘Bedrooms at Arles’: The Problem of Priority. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 12, 2 (1986). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/4115938.
[24]
Broude, N. 1977. Degas’s ‘Misogyny’. The Art Bulletin. 59, 1 (Mar. 1977). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3049600.
[25]
Broude, N. 1988. Edgar Degas and French Feminism, ca. 1880: ‘The Young Spartans,’ the Brothel Monotypes, and the Bathers Revisited. The Art Bulletin. 70, 4 (Dec. 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3051106.
[26]
Broude, N. 1991. Impressionism: a feminist reading ; the gendering of art, science, and nature in the nineteenth century. Rizzoli.
[27]
Broude, N. 2000. Mary Cassatt: Modern Woman or the Cult of True Womanhood? Woman’s Art Journal. 21, 2 (Autumn 2000). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1358749.
[28]
Broude, N. 1978. Seurat in perspective. Prentice-Hall.
[29]
Burton, R. 1988. ‘The Unseen Seer, or Proteus in the City: Aspects of a Nineteenth-Century Parisian Myth’. French studies. XLll, (1988), 50–68.
[30]
Callen, A. 1995. The spectacular body: science, method and meaning in the work of  Degas. Yale University Press.
[31]
Carrier, D. 1990. Art History in the Mirror Stage: Interpreting un Bar aux Folies Bergeres. History and Theory. 29, 3 (Oct. 1990). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2505053.
[32]
Carrier, D. 2004. The Beauty of Henri Matisse. Journal of Aesthetic Education. 38, 2 (Summer 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3527318.
[33]
Cézanne, P. et al. 1978. Cézanne: the late work. Thames and Hudson.
[34]
Cézanne, P. et al. 2014. The world is an apple: the still lifes of Paul Cézanne. Art Gallery of Hamilton in association with D Giles Limited.
[35]
Cézanne, P. and Doran, P.M. 2001. Conversations with Cézanne. University of California Press.
[36]
Chave, A.C. 1994. New Encounters with Les Demoiselles d’Avignon: Gender, Race, and the Origins of Cubism. The Art Bulletin. 76, 4 (Dec. 1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3046058.
[37]
Cheetham, M.A. 1987. Mystical Memories: Gauguin’s Neoplatonism and ‘Abstraction’ in Late-Nineteenth-Century French Painting. Art Journal. 46, 1 (Spring 1987). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776838.
[38]
Chu, P. ten-Doesschate 1977. Courbet in perspective. Prentice-Hall.
[39]
Clark, T.J. 1995. Freud’s Cézanne. Representations. 52 (Oct. 1995), 94–122. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2928701.
[40]
Clark, T.J. 1973. Image of the people: Gustave Courbet and the 1848 revolution. Thames and Hudson.
[41]
Clark, T.J. 1980. Preliminaries to a Possible Treatment of ‘Olympia’ in 1865. Screen. 21, 1 (Mar. 1980), 18–42. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/21.1.18.
[42]
Clark, T.J. 1973. The absolute bourgeois: artists and politics in France, 1848-1851. Thames and Hudson.
[43]
Clark, T.J. 1985. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his  followers. Thames and Hudson.
[44]
Clark, T.J. 1985. The painting of modern life: Paris in the art of Manet and his  followers. Thames and Hudson.
[45]
Clark, T.J. and Picasso, P. 2013. Picasso and truth: from cubism to Guernica. Princeton University Press.
[46]
Clayson, S.H. 1989. The Family and the Father: The ‘Grande Jatte’ and Its Absences. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 14, 2 (1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/4108748.
[47]
Clement Greenberg, ‘Avant-Garde and Kitsch’. Partisan review. VI, 5, 34–49.
[48]
Collins, B.R. 1996. 12 Views of Manet’s Bar. Princeton University Press.
[49]
Collins, B.R. 1978. Manet’s Luncheon in the Studio: An Homage to Baudelaire. Art Journal. 38, 2 (Winter 1978). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776419.
[50]
Cox, N. 2000. Cubism. Phaidon Press Limited.
[51]
Crapo, P.B. 1995. The Problematics of Artistic Patronage under the Second Empire: Gustave Courbet’s Involved Relations with the Regime of Napoleon III. Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 58, 2 (1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1482704.
[52]
Czestochowski, J.S. and Pingeot, A. 2002. Degas sculptures: catalogue raisonné of the bronzes. Torch Press.
[53]
Daphne S. Barbour 1992. Degas’s Wax Sculptures from the inside out. The Burlington Magazine. 134, 1077 (1992), 798–805.
[54]
Druick, D.W. et al. 2001. Van Gogh and Gauguin: the studio of the south. Thames & Hudson.
[55]
D’Souza, A. 2008. Cézanne’s bathers: biography and the erotics of paint. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[56]
Edward D. Powers 2002. From Eternity to Here: Paul Gauguin and the Word Made Flesh. Oxford Art Journal. 25, 2 (2002), 89–106.
[57]
Eisenman, S. 1997. Gauguin’s skirt. Thames and Hudson.
[58]
Elizabeth Easton and Jared Bark 2008. ‘Pictures Properly Framed’: Degas and Innovation in Impressionist Frames. The Burlington Magazine. 150, 1266 (2008), 603–611.
[59]
Faunce, S. et al. 1988. Courbet reconsidered. Brooklyn Museum.
[60]
Flam, J.D. and Matisse, H. 1986. Matisse: the man and his art, 1869-1918. Thames and Hudson.
[61]
Francis Frascina 2003. Institutions, Culture, and America’s ‘Cold War Years’: The Making of Greenberg’s ‘Modernist Painting’. Oxford Art Journal. 26, 1 (2003), 71–97.
[62]
Frascina, F. et al. 1988. Modern art and modernism: a critical anthology. Paul Chapman in association with the Open University.
[63]
Frascina, F. 1993. Modernity and modernism: French painting in the nineteenth century. Yale University Press, in association with the Open University.
[64]
Frédérique Desbuissons 2008. Courbet’s Materialism. Oxford Art Journal. 31, 2 (2008), 253–260.
[65]
Fried, M. 1996. Manet’s modernism, or, The face of painting in the 1860s. University of Chicago Press.
[66]
Fried, M. and Courbet, G. 1990. Courbet’s realism. University of Chicago Press.
[67]
Friedrich, O. 1992. Olympia: Paris in the age of Manet. Aurum Press.
[68]
Garb, T. 1998. Bodies of modernity: figure and flesh in fin-de-siècle France. Thames & Hudson.
[69]
Garb, T. 1989. ‘L’ART FÉMININ’: THE FORMATION OF A CRITICAL CATEGORY IN LATE NINETEENTH-CENTURY FRANCE. Art History. 12, 1 (Mar. 1989), 39–65. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1989.tb00336.x.
[70]
Gaskell, I. and Kemal, S. 1991. The Language of art history. Cambridge University Press.
[71]
Geist, S. 1988. Interpreting Cézanne. Harvard University Press.
[72]
Gogh, V. van et al. 1984. Van Gogh in Arles. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
[73]
Golding, J. 1959. Cubism: a history and an analysis, 1907-1914. Faber.
[74]
Halperin, J.U. 1988. Félix Fénéon: aesthete & anarchist in fin-de-siècle Paris. Yale University Press.
[75]
Hanson, A.C. 1977. Manet and the modern tradition. Yale University Press.
[76]
Harrison, C. 2005. Painting the difference: sex and spectator in modern art. University of Chicago Press.
[77]
Harrison, C. and Wood, P. 1992. Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Blackwell.
[78]
Harrison, C. and Wood, P. 1992. Art in theory, 1900-1990: an anthology of changing ideas. Blackwell.
[79]
Heelan, P.A. 1972. Toward a New Analysis of the Pictorial Space of Vincent Van Gogh. The Art Bulletin. 54, 4 (Dec. 1972). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3049037.
[80]
Herbert, J.D. 1992. Fauve painting: the making of cultural politics. Yale University Press.
[81]
Herbert, R.L. 1988. Impressionism: art, leisure and Parisian society. Yale University Press.
[82]
Herbert, R.L. et al. 2004. Seurat: and the making of La Grande Jatte. The Art Institute of Chicago in association with University of California Press.
[83]
Herding, K. 1991. Courbet: to venture independence. Yale University Press.
[84]
Hiddleston, J.A. 1999. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Clarendon Press.
[85]
Hiddleston, J.A. 1999. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Clarendon Press.
[86]
Hiddleston, J.A. 1999. Baudelaire and the art of memory. Clarendon.
[87]
Hiddleston, J.A. 1992. Baudelaire, Manet, and Modernity. The Modern Language Review. 87, 3 (Jul. 1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3732920.
[88]
Hobbs, R. 1998. Impressions of French modernity: art and literature in France,  1850-1900. Manchester University Press.
[89]
Homer, W.I. 1964. Seurat and the science of painting. M.I.T. Press.
[90]
House, J. 2004. Impressionism: paint and politics. Yale University Press.
[91]
House, J. 1980. MEANING IN SEURAT’S FIGURE PAINTINGS. Art History. 3, 3 (Sep. 1980), 345–356. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1980.tb00082.x.
[92]
House, J. and Monet, C. 1986. Monet: nature into art. Yale University Press.
[93]
Hulsker, J. et al. 1990. Vincent and Theo van Gogh: a dual biography. Fuller Publications.
[94]
III, M.H. 1977. The Origin of Paul Gauguin’s Vision after the Sermon: Jacob Wrestling with the Angel (1888). The Art Bulletin. 59, 3 (Sep. 1977). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3049673.
[95]
Isaacson, J. 1994. Constable, Duranty, Mallarme, Impressionism, Plein Air, and Forgetting. The Art Bulletin. 76, 3 (Sep. 1994). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3046037.
[96]
Iskin, R.E. 1995. Selling, Seduction, and Soliciting the Eye: Manet’s Bar at the Folies-Bergere. The Art Bulletin. 77, 1 (Mar. 1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3046078.
[97]
Jill DeVonyar and Richard Kendall 2003. The Class of 1881: Degas, Drawing, and the ‘Little Dancer Aged Fourteen’. Master Drawings. 41, 2 (2003), 151–162.
[98]
Jirat-Wasiutynski, V. 1987. Paul Gauguin’s ‘Self-Portrait with Halo and Snake’: The Artist as Initiate and Magus. Art Journal. 46, 1 (Spring 1987). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776839.
[99]
Jirat-Wasiutyński, V. et al. 2000. Technique and meaning in the paintings of Paul Gauguin. Cambridge University Press.
[100]
John Golding 1958. The ‘Demoiselles d’Avignon’. The Burlington Magazine. 100, 662 (1958), 154–163.
[101]
John Klein 1998. The Dispersal of the Modernist Series. Oxford Art Journal. 21, 1 (1998), 123–135.
[102]
John Tchalenko 2009. Henri Matisse Drawing: An Eye-Hand Interaction Study Based on Archival Film. Leonardo. 42, 5 (2009), 433–438.
[103]
Juliet Wilson Bareau 1986. The Hidden Face of Manet. An Investigation of the Artist’s Working Processes [Exhibition Catalog]. The Burlington Magazine. 128, 997 (1986).
[104]
June Hargrove ‘Degas’s Little dancer in the world of pantomime’. Apollo. 147, 432, 15–21.
[105]
Kahng, E. et al. 2011. Picasso and Braque: the Cubist experiment, 1910-1912. Santa Barbara Museum of Art.
[106]
Karmel, P. 2003. Picasso and the invention of Cubism. Yale University Press.
[107]
KATHRYN BROWN 2010. The Aesthetics of Presence: Looking at Degas’s ‘Bathers’. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 68, 4 (2010), 331–341.
[108]
Kay Redfield Jamison and Richard Jed Wyatt 6826. Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 304, 6826 (6826).
[109]
Kear, J. 1991. MAKING HAY WITH MONET: MONETS OF THE ′90s. Art History. 14, 4 (Dec. 1991), 593–599. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1991.tb00459.x.
[110]
Kendall, R. and Joslyn Art Museum 1998. Degas and the little dancer. Yale University Press in association with Joslyn  Art Museum, Omaha.
[111]
Kessler, M.R. 1999. Unmasking Manet’s Morisot. The Art Bulletin. 81, 3 (Sep. 1999). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3051353.
[112]
Kodera, T. 1984. Japan as Primitivistic Utopia: Van Gogh’s Japonisme Portraits. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art. 14, 3/4 (1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3780577.
[113]
Kōdera, T. and Rosenberg, Y. 1993. The Mythology of Vincent Van Gogh. TV Asahi.
[114]
Leighten, P. 1988. Revising Cubism. Art Journal. 47, 4 (Winter 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776977.
[115]
Leighten, P.D. 1989. Re-ordering the universe: Picasso and anarchism, 1897-1914. Princeton University Press.
[116]
Lesko, D. 1979. From Genre to Allegory in Gustave Courbet’s Les Demoiselles de Village. Art Journal. 38, 3 (Spring 1979). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776270.
[117]
Levine, S.Z. 1986. Monet’s Series: Repetition, Obsession. October. 37, (Summer 1986). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/778519.
[118]
Lewis, M.T. 2007. Critical readings in Impressionism and post-Impressionism: an anthology. University of California Press.
[119]
Linda Goddard 2008. ‘The Writings of a Savage?’ Literary Strategies in Paul Gauguin’s “Noa Noa”. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes. 71, (2008), 277–293.
[120]
Lipton, E. 1993. Alias Olympia: a woman’s search for Manet’s notorious model & her  own desire. Thames and Hudson.
[121]
Lipton, E. and Degas, E. 1986. Looking into Degas: uneasy images of women and modern life. University of California Press.
[122]
Lloyd, C. 1986. Studies on Camille Pissarro. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[123]
Locke, N. 2001. Manet and the family romance. Princeton University Press.
[124]
Locke, N. 2000. Unfinished Homage: Manet’s ‘Burial’ and Baudelaire. The Art Bulletin. 82, 1 (Mar. 2000). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3051365.
[125]
Loran, E. and Cézanne, P. 2006. Cézanne’s composition: analysis of his form with diagrams and photographs of his motifs. University of California Press.
[126]
Loretta S. Loftus and Wilfred Niels Arnold 1991. Vincent Van Gogh’s Illness: Acute Intermittent Porphyria? BMJ: British Medical Journal. 303, 6817 (1991), 1589–1591.
[127]
Marilyn R. Brown 2007. ‘Miss La La’s’ Teeth: Reflections on Degas and ‘Race’. The Art Bulletin. 89, 4 (2007), 738–765.
[128]
Martensen-Larsen, B. 1985. When Did Picasso Complete ‘Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’? Zeitschrift für Kunstgeschichte. 48, 2 (1985). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1482281.
[129]
Mary Louise Krumrine 1992. Cézanne’s ‘Restricted Power’: Further Reflections on the ‘Bathers’. The Burlington Magazine. 134, 1074 (1992), 586–595.
[130]
Mary Louise Krumrine 1990. Paul Cézanne. Thames and Hudson in association with Kunstmuseum Basel.
[131]
Matisse, H. and Flam, J.D. 1973. Matisse on art. Phaidon.
[132]
Mauner, G.L. 1975. Manet, peintre-philosophe: a study of the painter’s themes. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[133]
McQuillan, M.A. and Gogh, V. van 2005. Van Gogh. Thames and Hudson.
[134]
Meyer Shapiro ‘The nature of Abstract Art’. Marxist quarterly. 1, 1, 77–98.
[135]
Michael Fried 1992. Manet in His Generation: The Face of Painting in the 1860s. Critical Inquiry. 19, 1 (1992), 22–69.
[136]
Michael Fried 1982. Painter into Painting: On Courbet’s ‘After Dinner at Ornans’ and ‘Stonebreakers’. Critical Inquiry. 8, 4 (1982), 619–649.
[137]
Michael Fried 1984. Painting Memories: On the Containment of the past in Baudelaire and Manet. Critical Inquiry. 10, 3 (1984), 510–542.
[138]
Michael Fried 1983. The Structure of Beholding in Courbet’s ‘Burial at Ornans’. Critical Inquiry. 9, 4 (1983), 635–683.
[139]
Moffitt, J.F. 1987. Art and Politics: An Underlying Pictorial - Political Topos in Courbet’s ‘Real Allegory’. Artibus et Historiae. 8, 15 (1987). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1483277.
[140]
Mullins, E.B. and Braque, G. 1968. Braque. Thames and Hudson.
[141]
Murray, A. 1980. ‘STRANGE AND SUBTLE PERSPECTIVE …’: Van Gogh, The Hague School and the Dutch Landscape Tradition. Art History. 3, 4 (Dec. 1980), 410–424. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1980.tb00086.x.
[142]
Nicolson, B. Courbet, The studio of the painter. Viking Press.
[143]
Nochlin, L. 1967. Gustave Courbet’s Meeting: A Portrait of the Artist as a Wandering Jew. The Art Bulletin. 49, 3 (Sep. 1967). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3048470.
[144]
Nochlin, L. Impressionism and post-impressionism, 1874-1904: sources and  documents. Prentice-Hall.
[145]
Nochlin, L. 1990. Realism. Penguin.
[146]
Nochlin, L. 1989. Seurat’s Grande Jatte: An Anti-Utopian Allegory. Art Institute of Chicago Museum Studies. 14, 2 (1989). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/4108747.
[147]
Patricia Leighten 1994. Cubist Anachronisms: Ahistoricity, Cryptoformalism, and Business-as-Usual in New York. Oxford Art Journal. 17, 2 (1994), 91–102.
[148]
Paul Smith, ’Joachim Gasquet, Virgil and Cézanne’s Landscape: ‘My Beloved Golden Age’. Apollo. 147, 147, 11–23.
[149]
Penrose, R. et al. 1981. Picasso in retrospect. Granada.
[150]
Pissarro, C. et al. 1980. Pissarro: Camille Pissarro 1830-1903. Arts Council of Great Britain.
[151]
Pissarro, C. et al. 1992. The impressionist and the city: Pissarro’s series paintings. Yale University Press.
[152]
Poggi, C. 1992. In defiance of painting: cubism, futurism, and the invention of  collage. Yale University Press.
[153]
Pollock, G. and Cassatt, M. 1998. Mary Cassatt: painter of modern women. Thames & Hudson.
[154]
Pollock, G. and Kendall, R. 1992. Dealing with Degas: representations of women and the politics of  vision. Pandora.
[155]
Pollock, Griselda. Vision and difference. Routledge.
[156]
Prendergast, C. 1992. Paris and the nineteenth century. Blackwell.
[157]
Przyblyski, J.M. 1996. Courbet, the Commune, and the Meanings of Still Life in 1871. Art Journal. 55, 2 (Summer 1996). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/777743.
[158]
Reff, T. 1962. Cezanne, Flaubert, St. Anthony, and the Queen of Sheba. The Art Bulletin. 44, 2 (Jun. 1962). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3047999.
[159]
Reff, T. 1976. Degas, the artist’s mind. Thames and Hudson.
[160]
Reff, T. 1971. The Technical Aspects of Degas’s Art. Metropolitan Museum Journal. 4, (Jan. 1971), 141–166. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1512619.
[161]
Reff, T. and Manet, É. 1976. Manet - ‘Olympia’. Allen Lane.
[162]
Rewald, J. 1961. The history of impressionism. Museum of Modern Art.
[163]
Rewald, J. and Weitzenhoffer, F. 1984. Aspects of Monet: a symposium on the artist’s life and times. Abrams.
[164]
Richard Kendall 1988. Degas and the Contingency of Vision. The Burlington Magazine. 130, 1020 (1988), 180–216.
[165]
Richard Shiff 1992. Handling Shocks: On the Representation of Experience in Walter Benjamin’s Analogies. Oxford Art Journal. 15, 2 (1992), 88–103.
[166]
Richard Shiff 1978. Seeing Cézanne. Critical Inquiry. 4, 4 (1978), 769–808.
[167]
Roger Benjamin 1987. Matisse’s ‘Notes of a painter’. UMI Research Press.
[168]
Roskill, M.W. Van Gogh, Gauguin and the Impressionist circle. Thames and Hudson.
[169]
Rubin, J.H. 1994. Manet’s silence and the poetics of bouquets. Reaktion.
[170]
Rubin, J.H. 1980. Realism and social vision in Courbet & Proudhon. Princeton University Press.
[171]
Rubin, W. 1983. From Narrative to ‘Iconic’ in Picasso: The Buried Allegory in Bread and Fruitdish on a Table and the Role of Les Demoiselles d’Avignon. The Art Bulletin. 65, 4 (Dec. 1983). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3050371.
[172]
Rubin, W. and Museum of Modern Art (New York, N.Y.) 1989. Picasso and Braque: pioneering cubism. Museum of Modern Art.
[173]
Seibert, M.A. 1983. A Political and a Pictorial Tradition Used in Gustave Courbet’s Real Allegory. The Art Bulletin. 65, 2 (Jun. 1983). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3050325.
[174]
Seurat, G. et al. 1991. Seurat: Galeries nationales du Grand Palais, Paris, 9 avril-12  août1991. Éditions de la Reunion des musées nationaux.
[175]
Seurat, G. and Kahn, G. 1971. The drawings of Georges Seurat. Dover Publications.
[176]
Shackelford, G.T.M. et al. 2013. Paul Gauguin: Where do we come from? What are we? Where are we going?. MFA publications, Museum of Fine Arts.
[177]
Shiff, R. 1984. Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory,  technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. University of Chicago Press.
[178]
Shiff, R. 1984. Cézanne and the end of impressionism: a study of the theory,  technique, and critical evaluation of modern art. University of Chicago Press.
[179]
Shiff, R. 1991. Constructing Physicality. Art Journal. 50, 1 (Spring 1991). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/777084.
[180]
Sidlauskas, S. 1993. Resisting Narrative: The Problem of Edgar Degas’s Interior. The Art Bulletin. 75, 4 (Dec. 1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3045989.
[181]
Silverman, D. 2001. Van Gogh and Gauguin: the search for sacred art. Farrar Straus Giroux.
[182]
Smith, G. 1991. On Walter Benjamin: critical essays and recollections. MIT Press.
[183]
Smith, P. 2013. Cézanne’s "Primitive” Perspective, or the "View from Everywhere”. The Art Bulletin. 95, 1 (Mar. 2013), 102–119. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00043079.2013.10786108.
[184]
Smith, P. 1997. Manet Bits. Art History. 20, 3 (Sep. 1997), 477–482. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8365.00072.
[185]
Smith, P. 1992. ‘PARBLEU’: PISSARRO AND THE POLITICAL COLOUR OF AN ORIGINAL VISION. Art History. 15, 2 (Jun. 1992), 223–247. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1992.tb00482.x.
[186]
Smith, P. and Seurat, G. 1997. Seurat and the avant-garde. Yale University Press.
[187]
Smith, P. and Wilde, C. 2002. A companion to art theory. Blackwell.
[188]
Spate, V. and Monet, C. 1992. The colour of time: Claude Monet. Thames and Hudson.
[189]
Steefel, L.D. 1992. The Neglected Fruit Cluster in Picasso’s ‘Les Demoiselles d’Avignon’. Artibus et Historiae. 13, 26 (1992). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/1483434.
[190]
Steinberg, L. 1988. The Philosophical Brothel. October. 44, (Spring 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/778974.
[191]
Steiner, W. 1986. Divide and narrate: the icon-symbol tension in Seurat. Word & Image. 2, 4 (Oct. 1986), 342–348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02666286.1986.10435358.
[192]
Stumpel, J. 1984. The ‘Grande Jatte,’ That Patient Tapestry. Simiolus: Netherlands Quarterly for the History of Art. 14, 3/4 (1984). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3780578.
[193]
Sund, J. 1988. FAVOURED FICTIONS: WOMEN AND BOOKS IN THE ART OF VAN GOGH. Art History. 11, 2 (Jun. 1988), 255–267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1988.tb00298.x.
[194]
T. J. Clark 1969. A Bourgeois Dance of Death: Max Buchon on Courbet-I. The Burlington Magazine. 111, 793 (1969), 208–213.
[195]
T. J. Clark 1982. Clement Greenberg’s Theory of Art. Critical Inquiry. 9, 1 (1982), 139–156.
[196]
Tamar Garb 1996. Visuality and Sexuality in Cézanne’s Late Bathers. Oxford Art Journal. 19, 2 (1996), 46–60.
[197]
The letters - Vincent van Gogh Letters: http://vangoghletters.org/vg/letters.html.
[198]
Thierry de Duve and Brian Holmes 1998. How Manet’s ‘A Bar at the Folies-Bergère’ Is Constructed. Critical Inquiry. 25, 1 (1998), 136–168.
[199]
Thomson, B. 2001. Gauguin. Thames and Hudson.
[200]
Thomson, R. et al. 1990. Camille Pissarro: Impressionism, landscape and rural labour. Herbert Press.
[201]
Thomson, R. et al. 1998. Framing France: the representation of landscape in France, 1870-1914. Manchester University Press.
[202]
Thomson, R. and Degas, E. 1988. Degas: the nudes. Thames and Hudson.
[203]
Ting Chang 1996. ‘The Meeting’: Gustave Courbet and Alfred Bruyas. The Burlington Magazine. 138, 1122 (1996), 586–591.
[204]
Tom McDonough 2002. The Crimes of the Flaneur. October. 102, (2002), 101–122.
[205]
Toussaint, H. et al. 1977. Gustave Courbet: 1819-1877 , (exposition organisée par la Réunion  des musées nationaux et l’Arts Council of Great Britain), Grand  Palais, 30 septembre 1977-2 janvier 1978 , (catalogue. Ministère de la culture et de l’environnement, Éditions des  musées nationaux.
[206]
Tucker, P.H. et al. 1990. Monet in the ’90s: the series paintings. Museum of Fine Arts.
[207]
Ward, J.L. 1976. A Reexamination of Van Gogh’s Pictorial Space. The Art Bulletin. 58, 4 (Dec. 1976). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/3049573.
[208]
Ward, M. 1996. Pissarro, Neo-impressionism, and the spaces of the avant-garde. University of Chicago Press.
[209]
Wayne V. Andersen 1967. Gauguin and a Peruvian Mummy. The Burlington Magazine. 109, 769 (1967), 238–243.
[210]
Weisberg, G.P. and Cleveland Museum of Art The realist tradition: French painting and drawing, 1830-1900. Cleveland Museum of Art.
[211]
Werth, M. 2002. The joy of life: the idyllic in French art, circa 1900. University of California Press.
[212]
Where Do We Come From? What Are We? Where Are We Going? | Museum of Fine Arts, Boston: http://www.mfa.org/collections/object/where-do-we-come-from-what-are-we-where-are-we-going-32558.
[213]
William Cloonan 1990. Braque’s Le Portugais and a Portuguese Nun. The French Review. 63, 4 (1990), 607–616.
[214]
Wright, A. 1998. Arche-tectures: Matisse and the End of (Art) History. October. 84, (Spring 1998). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/779208.
[215]
Wright, A. 2004. Matisse and the subject of modernism. Princeton University Press.
[216]
Yeh, S.F. 1976. Mary Cassatt’s Images of Women. Art Journal. 35, 4 (Summer 1976). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/776228.
[217]
Zelevansky, L. 1992. Picasso and Braque: a symposium. Museum of Modern Art.
[218]
Zelevansky, L. 1992. Picasso and Braque: a symposium. Museum of Modern Art.
[219]
Zemel, C. 1987. SORROWING WOMEN, RESCUING MEN: VAN GOGH’S IMAGES OF WOMEN AND FAMILY. Art History. 10, 3 (Sep. 1987), 351–368. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8365.1987.tb00261.x.
[220]
Ziva Amishai-Maisels 1973. Gauguin’s ‘Philosophical Eve’. The Burlington Magazine. 115, 843 (1973), 373–382.
[221]
Impressionism: A Feminist Reading: The Gendering Of Art, Science, And Nature In The Nineteenth Century by Broude, Norma (1997) Paperback.
[222]
Impressionism : beneath the surface / Paul Smith.
[223]
26AD. Is Paris Still the Capital of the Nineteenth Century?: Essays on Art and Modernity, 1850-1900. Routledge.
[224]
More on a Name: Manet’s ‘Olympia’ and the Defiant Heroine in Mid-Nineteenth-Century France.
[225]
2010. Seurat Re-viewed (Refiguring Modernism) (2010-04-30). Penn State University Press (2010-04-30).
[226]
Special Issue: Pissarro. Apollo. 136, 369.
[227]
2007. Value, art, politics. Liverpool University Press.