[1]
Ahlquist, S. 2013. ‘Storyline’: a task-based approach for the young learner classroom. ELT Journal. 67, 1 (2013), 41–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccs052.
[2]
Akbari, R. 2007. Transforming lives: introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal. 62, 3 (Apr. 2007), 276–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn025.
[3]
Anderson, W. and Corbett, J. 2010. Teaching English as a friendly language: lessons from the SCOTS corpus. ELT Journal. 64, 4 (Oct. 2010), 414–423. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp085.
[4]
Anderson, Wendy and Corbett, John 2009. Exploring English with online corpora: an introduction. Palgrave Macmillan.
[5]
Atkinson, D. 2003. L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12, 1 (2003), 3–15. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00123-6.
[6]
Badger, R. and White, G. 2000. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal. 54, 2 (Apr. 2000), 153–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153.
[7]
Badger, R. and White, G. 2000. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal. 54, 1 (2000), 153–160.
[8]
Basturkmen, H. 1998. Refining procedures: A needs analysis project at Kuwait University. English Teaching Forum. 36, 4 (1998).
[9]
Basturkmen, Helen 2010. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Palgrave Macmillan.
[10]
Basturkmen, Helen 2006. Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[11]
Basturkmen, Helen 2006. Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
[12]
Bax, S. 2003. Bringing context and methodology together. ELT Journal. 57, 3 (Jul. 2003), 295–296. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.295.
[13]
Bax, S. 2003. Bringing context and methodology together. ELT journal. 57, 3 (2003), 295–296.
[14]
Bax, S. 2003. The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal. 57, 3 (Jul. 2003), 278–287. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.278.
[15]
Bax, S. 2003. The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT journal. 57, 3 (2003), 278–287.
[16]
Beck, S.W. 2006. Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing. Research in the Teaching of English. 40, 4 (2006), 413–460.
[17]
Beck, S.W. 2006. Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing. Research in the teaching of English. 40, 4 (2006), 413–460.
[18]
Belcher, D.D. 2004. Trends in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, (Mar. 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026719050400008X.
[19]
Belcher, D.D. 2004. Trends in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual review of applied linguistics. 24, (2004), 165–186.
[20]
Belcher, Diane Dewhurst 2009. English for specific purposes in theory and practice. University of Michigan Press.
[21]
Belcher, Diane Dewhurst et al. 2011. New directions in English for specific purposes research. University of Michigan Press.
[22]
Bell, D.M. 2009. Another breakthrough, another baby thrown out with the bathwater. ELT Journal. 63, 3 (Jul. 2009), 255–262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp027.
[23]
Benesch, Sarah 2001. Critical English for academic purposes: theory, politics, and  practice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[24]
Besio, C. and Pronzini, A. 2011. Inside Organizations and Out. Methodological Tenets for Empirical Research Inspired by Systems Theory. Urban education. 46, 1 (2011), 18–41.
[25]
Bhatia, V. K. 1993. Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. Longman.
[26]
Bialostok, S. 2002. Metaphors for Literacy: A Cultural Model of White, Middle-Class Parents. Linguistics and Education. 13, 3 (2002), 347–371. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-5898(02)00088-8.
[27]
Bourke, J.M. 2006. Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT Journal. 60, 3 (Jul. 2006), 279–286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl008.
[28]
Bourke, J.M. 2006. Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT journal. 60, 3 (2006), 279–286.
[29]
Boxer, D. 1995. Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: the case of complaints. ELT Journal. 49, 1 (Jan. 1995), 44–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.1.44.
[30]
Boxer, D. and Pickering, L. 1995. Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: the case of complaints. ELT journal. 49, 1 (1995), 44–58.
[31]
Brown, H. Douglas 2007. Principles of language learning and teaching. Pearson Longman.
[32]
Brown, S. 2012. Managing change in universities: a Sisyphean task? Quality in Higher Education. 18, 1 (Apr. 2012), 139–146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2012.663547.
[33]
Brown, Tony and Jones, Liz 2001. Action research and postmodernism: congruence and critique. Open University Press.
[34]
Burns, A. 2003. ESL Curriculum Development in Australia: Recent Trends and Debates. RELC Journal. 34, 3 (Dec. 2003), 261–283. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400302.
[35]
Burns, A. 2003. ESL Curriculum Development in Australia: Recent Trends and Debates. RELC journal. 34, 3 (2003), 261–283.
[36]
Bygate, M. 2005. Applied Linguistics: A Pragmatic Discipline, a Generic Discipline? Applied Linguistics. 26, 4 (Dec. 2005), 568–581. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami032.
[37]
Bygate, M. 2005. Applied Linguistics: A Pragmatic Discipline, a Generic Discipline? Applied linguistics. 26, 4 (2005), 568–581.
[38]
Carless, D. 2013. Innovation in language teaching and learning. The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Wiley-Blackwell.
[39]
Carter, R. 1998. Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal. 52, 1 (Jan. 1998), 43–56. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.1.43.
[40]
Chen, Y.-S. and Su, S.-W. 2012. A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal. 66, 2 (Apr. 2012), 184–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr061.
[41]
Chen, Y.-S. and Su, S.-W. 2012. A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal. 66, 2 (Apr. 2012), 184–192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr061.
[42]
Cheng, A. 2007. Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English for Specific Purposes. 26, 3 (2007), 287–307. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.002.
[43]
Cheng, Y.S. 2004. A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing. 13, 4 (2004), 313–335. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001.
[44]
Chouliaraki, Lilie and Fairclough, Norman 2002. Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh University Press.
[45]
Clarke, M.A. 1994. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL quarterly. 28, 1 (1994), 9–26.
[46]
Clarke, M.A. 1994. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL quarterly. 28, 1 (1994), 9–26.
[47]
Clarke, Mark A. 2003. A place to stand: essays for educators in troubled times. University of Michigan Press.
[48]
Clarke, Mark A. 2007. Common ground, contested territory: examining roles of English language teachers in troubled times. University of Michigan Press.
[49]
Cook, G. 1998. The uses of reality: a reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal. 52, 1 (Jan. 1998), 57–63. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.1.57.
[50]
Cook, G. 1998. The uses of reality: a reply to Ronald Carter. ELT journal. 52, 1 (1998), 57–63.
[51]
Cooksey, R.W. 2011. Yours, Mine or Ours: What Counts as Innovation? The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension. 17, 3 (Jun. 2011), 283–295. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2011.559083.
[52]
Cots, J.M. 2006. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal. 60, 4 (Oct. 2006), 336–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl024.
[53]
Cots, J.M. 2006. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT journal. 60, 4 (2006), 336–345.
[54]
Cots, J.M. 2006. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal. 60, 4 (Oct. 2006), 336–345. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl024.
[55]
Cots, J.M. 2006. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT journal. 60, 4 (2006), 336–345.
[56]
Crookes, G. 2010. The practicality and relevance of second language critical pedagogy. Language Teaching. 43, 03 (Jul. 2010), 333–348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990292.
[57]
Cullen, R. 2007. Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal. 62, 3 (2007), 221–230. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm042.
[58]
Dasli, M. 2011. Reviving the ‘moments’: from cultural awareness and cross‐cultural mediation to critical intercultural language pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. 19, 1 (Mar. 2011), 21–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2011.527118.
[59]
Dechant, K. and Dechant, L. 2010. Using systems theory to conceptualize the implementation of undergraduate online education in a university setting. Organization Management Journal. 7, 4 (Dec. 2010), 291–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2010.38.
[60]
Derince, Z.M. 2011. Language learning through critical pedagogy in a "Brave New World”. International Review of Education. 57, 3–4 (Aug. 2011), 377–395. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9218-8.
[61]
Douglas, Dan 2000. Assessing language for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.
[62]
Dudley-Evans, Tony and St. John, Maggie-Jo 1998. Developments in ESP: a multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge University Press.
[63]
Edge, J. 2000. Research and its agenda. TESOL matters. 11, 1 (2000).
[64]
Edge, Julian 2001. Action research. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages.
[65]
EH Hinkel, E. 2004. Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language teaching research. 8, 1 (2004), 5–29.
[66]
Eli EH Hinkel Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research. 8, 1, 5–29.
[67]
Eli Hinkel 2006. Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly. 40, 1 (2006), 109–131.
[68]
Ellis, G. 1996. How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT Journal. 50, 3 (Jul. 1996), 213–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/50.3.213.
[69]
Ellis, G. 1996. How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT journal. 50, 3 (1996), 213–218.
[70]
Ellis, R. 2003. Designing a task based syllabus. RELC journal. 34, 1 (2003), 64–81.
[71]
Ellis, R. 2003. Designing a Task-Based Syllabus. RELC Journal. 34, 1 (Apr. 2003), 64–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400105.
[72]
Ellis, R. 2003. Designing a Task-Based Syllabus. RELC Journal. 34, 1 (Apr. 2003), 64–81. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400105.
[73]
Ellis, R. 2003. Designing a Task-Based Syllabus. RELC journal. 34, 1 (2003), 64–81.
[74]
Ellis, R. 2010. Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching. 43, 02 (Apr. 2010). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990139.
[75]
Ellis, R. 1993. Talking shop: second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? ELT journal. 47, 1 (1993), 3–11.
[76]
Ellis, Rod 1990. Instructed second language acquisition: learning in the classroom. Basil Blackwell.
[77]
Ellis, Rod Talking shop: Second language acquisition research: how does it help teachers? ELT Journal. 47, 1, 3-11-3–11.
[78]
Ellis, Rod 2008. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press.
[79]
Ellsworth, J.B. et al. 2000. Surviving change: a survey of educational change models. Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University.
[80]
Eng Tan, K. and Miller, J. 2007. Writing in English in Malaysian High Schools: The Discourse of Examinations. Language and education. 21, 2 (2007), 124–140.
[81]
Erlam, R. 2008. What Do You Researchers Know about Language Teaching? Bridging the Gap Between SLA Research and Language Pedagogy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. 2, 3 (Nov. 2008), 253–267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802158958.
[82]
Fang, X. and Warschauer, M. 2004. Technology and Curricular Reform in China: A Case Study. TESOL quarterly. 38, 2 (2004), 301–323.
[83]
Flowerdew, John 1994. Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge University Press.
[84]
Flowerdew, John and Peacock, Matthew 2001. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge University Press.
[85]
Forey, G. 2004. Workplace texts: do they mean the same for teachers and business people? English for Specific Purposes. 23, 4 (2004), 447–469. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2004.01.003.
[86]
Fullan, Michael 2007. The new meaning of educational change. Teachers College Press.
[87]
Gavioli, L. 2001. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal. 55, 3 (Jul. 2001), 238–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.238.
[88]
Gavioli, L. 2001. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal. 55, 3 (Jul. 2001), 238–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.3.238.
[89]
Gavioli, L. and Aston, G. 2001. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT journal. 55, 3 (2001), 238–246.
[90]
Gavioli, L. and Aston, G. 2001. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT journal. 55, 3 (2001), 238–246.
[91]
Gibson, S. 2008. Reading aloud: a useful learning tool? ELT Journal. 62, 1 (2008), 29–36. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm075.
[92]
Gilmore, A. 2004. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal. 58, 4 (Oct. 2004), 363–374. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.363.
[93]
Gilmore, A. 2004. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT journal. 58, 4 (2004), 363–374.
[94]
Gilmore, A. 2007. Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching. 40, 02 (Apr. 2007). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444807004144.
[95]
Grabe, William and Kaplan, Robert B. 1996. Theory and practice of writing: an applied linguistic perspective. Longman.
[96]
Graves, Kathleen 1996. Teachers as course developers. Cambridge University Press.
[97]
Graves, Kathleen 1996. Teachers as course developers. Cambridge University Press.
[98]
Gray, K. 1990. Syllabus design for the general class: what happens to theory when you apply it. ELT journal. 44, 4 (1990), 261–271.
[99]
Green, C. 2005. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT Journal. 59, 4 (Oct. 2005), 306–311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci059.
[100]
Green, C. 2005. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT journal. 59, 4 (2005), 306–311.
[101]
Green, C. 2005. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT Journal. 59, 4 (Oct. 2005), 306–311. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci059.
[102]
Green, C. 2005. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT journal. 59, 4 (2005), 306–311.
[103]
Guariento, W. 2001. Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal. 55, 4 (Oct. 2001), 347–353. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.4.347.
[104]
Guariento, W. and Morley, J. 2001. Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT journal. 55, 4 (2001), 347–353.
[105]
Gupta, D. 2004. CLT in India: context and methodology come together. ELT Journal. 58, 3 (Jul. 2004), 266–269. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.266.
[106]
Gupta, D. 2004. CLT in India: context and methodology come together. ELT journal. 58, 3 (2004), 266–269.
[107]
Guth, S. and Helm, F. 2012. Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration. ELT Journal. 66, 1 (2012), 42–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr027.
[108]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[109]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[110]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[111]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[112]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[113]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[114]
Hall, David and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge.
[115]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[116]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[117]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[118]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[119]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[120]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[121]
Hall, David R. and Hewings, Ann 2001. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University.
[122]
Harding, Keith 2007. English for specific purposes. Oxford University Press.
[123]
Harmer, J. 2003. Popular culture, methods, and context. ELT Journal. 57, 3 (Jul. 2003), 288–294. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/57.3.288.
[124]
Harmer, J. 2003. Popular culture, methods, and context. ELT journal. 57, 3 (2003), 288–294.
[125]
Harwood, Nigel 2010. English language teaching materials: theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.
[126]
Hazen, B. et al. 2011. A Proposed Framework for Educational Innovation Dissemination. Journal of educational technology systems. Vol. 40, Issue 3 (2011), 301–321.
[127]
Hewings, Martin et al. 1999. Business English: research into practice. Longman (in association with the British Council).
[128]
Hinkel, E. 2006. Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL quarterly. 40, 1 (2006), 109–131.
[129]
Hinkel, Eli 2005. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[130]
Hirose, K. 2003. Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12, 2 (2003), 181–209. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00015-8.
[131]
Hirose, K. 2006. Pursuing the complexity of the relationship between L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. 15, 2 (2006), 142–146. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.04.002.
[132]
Hodge, R. et al. ‘This is not enough for one’s life’: perceptions of living and learning English in Blackburn by students seeking asylum and refugee status. Working Papers. Lancaster Literacy Research Centre.
[133]
Hoey, Michael 2005. Lexical priming: a new theory of words and language. Routledge/AHRB.
[134]
Hoey, Michael 2005. Lexical priming: a new theory of words and language. Routledge.
[135]
Hoey, Michael et al. 2001. Patterns of text: in honour of Michael Hoey. John Benjamins Pub. Co.
[136]
Hoey, Michael et al. 2001. Patterns of text: in honour of Michael Hoey. John Benjamins Pub. Co.
[137]
Hoey, Michael 2007. Text, discourse and corpora: theory and analysis. Continuum.
[138]
Hoey, Michael 2007. Text, discourse and corpora: theory and analysis. Continuum.
[139]
Holme, R. and Chalauisaeng, B. 2006. The learner as needs analyst: The use of participatory appraisal in the EAP reading classroom. English for Specific Purposes. 25, 4 (2006), 403–419. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.01.003.
[140]
HOLMES, J. 1988. Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks. Applied linguistics. 9, 1 (1988), 51–44.
[141]
HOLMES, JANET Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks. Applied Linguistics. 9, 1, 21-44-21–44.
[142]
Hopkins, D. and Nettle, M. 1994. Second language acquisition research: a response to Rod. ELT journal. 48, 2 (1994), 157–161.
[143]
Hu, G. 2005. ’CLT is best for China’-- an untenable absolutist claim. ELT Journal. 59, 1 (Jan. 2005), 65–68. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci009.
[144]
Hu, G. 2005. ‘CLT is best for China’— an untenable absolutist claim. ELT journal. 59, 1 (2005), 65–68.
[145]
Huang, L.-S. 2011. Corpus-aided language learning. ELT Journal. 65, 4 (Oct. 2011), 481–484. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr031.
[146]
Hutchinson, Tom and Waters, Alan 1987. English for specific purposes: a learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press.
[147]
Huth, T.T. and Taleghani-Nikazm, C.C. 2006. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language teaching research. 10, 1 (2006), 53–79.
[148]
Hyland, K. 2003. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing. 12, 1 (2003), 17–29. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8.
[149]
Hyland, Ken 2004. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. University of Michigan Press.
[150]
Hyland, Ken 2000. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Longman.
[151]
Hyland, Ken 2009. Teaching and researching writing. Longman.
[152]
Hyland, Ken 2002. Teaching and researching writing. Longman.
[153]
Jane Willis and Dave Willis – Willis-ELT: http://www.willis-elt.co.uk/conferences.html.
[154]
Johnson, Robert Keith 1989. The second language curriculum. Cambridge University Press.
[155]
Johnston, B. and Peterson, S. 1994. The program matrix: A conceptual framework for language programs. System. 22, 1 (1994), 63–80.
[156]
Johnston, B. and Peterson, S. 1994. The program matrix: A conceptual framework for language programs. System: an international journal of educational technology and  applied linguistics. 22, 1 (1994), 63–80.
[157]
Johnstone, R. 2002. Research on language teaching and learning: 2001. Language Teaching. 35, 03 (Jul. 2002). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444802001799.
[158]
Johnstone, R. 2002. Research on language teaching and learning in 2001. Language teaching. 35, 3 (2002), 157–181.
[159]
Jones, J.F. 1995. Self-access and culture: retreating from autonomy. ELT Journal. 49, 3 (Jul. 1995), 228–234. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.3.228.
[160]
Jones, J.F. 1995. Self-access and culture: retreating from autonomy. ELT journal. 49, 3 (1995), 228–234.
[161]
Keck, C. 2006. The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. 15, 4 (2006), 261–278. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006.
[162]
Kim, E.-Y. 2011. Using translation exercises in the communicative EFL writing classroom. ELT Journal. 65, 2 (Apr. 2011), 154–160. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq039.
[163]
Kim McDonough and Wanpen Chaikitmongkol 2007. Teachers’ and Learners’ Reactions to a Task-Based EFL Course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly. 41, 1 (2007), 107–132.
[164]
Koprowski, M. 2005. Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT Journal. 59, 4 (Oct. 2005), 322–332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci061.
[165]
Koprowski, M. 2005. Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT journal. 59, 4 (2005), 322–332.
[166]
Kroll, Barbara 2003. Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
[167]
Lee, H.-C. 2013. The reading response e-journal: An alternative way to engage low-achieving EFL students. Language Teaching Research. 17, 1 (Jan. 2013), 111–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168812457539.
[168]
Lee, I. 1998. Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal. 52, 4 (Oct. 1998), 282–290. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.4.282.
[169]
Lee, I. 1998. Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT journal. 52, 4 (1998), 282–290.
[170]
Lee, W.Y. -c. 1995. Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal. 49, 4 (Oct. 1995), 323–328. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.4.323.
[171]
Lee, Y.-J. 2006. The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing. 15, 4 (2006), 307–330. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.003.
[172]
Liao, X. 2004. The need for Communicative Language Teaching in China. ELT Journal. 58, 3 (Jul. 2004), 270–273. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.3.270.
[173]
Liao, X. 2004. The need for Communicative Language Teaching in China. ELT journal. 58, 3 (2004), 270–273.
[174]
Lier, L.V. 1998. The Relationship Between Consciousness, Interaction and Language Learning. Language Awareness. 7, 2–3 (Jun. 1998), 128–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09658419808667105.
[175]
Lightbown, P. 2000. Anniversary article. Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics. 21, 4 (Dec. 2000), 431–462. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/21.4.431.
[176]
Lightbown, P. 2000. Anniversary article. Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied linguistics. 21, 4 (2000), 431–462.
[177]
Lin, B. 2003. English in Singapore: an Insider’s Perspective of Syllabus Renewal Through a Genre-Based Approach. RELC Journal. 34, 2 (Aug. 2003), 223–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400206.
[178]
Lin, B. 2003. English in Singapore: an Insider’s Perspective of Syllabus Renewal Through a Genre-Based Approach. RELC journal. 34, 2 (2003), 223–246.
[179]
Littlewood, W. 2009. Process-oriented pedagogy: facilitation, empowerment, or control? ELT Journal. 63, 3 (Jul. 2009), 246–254. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn054.
[180]
Littlewood, W. 2004. The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal. 58, 4 (Oct. 2004), 319–326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.4.319.
[181]
Littlewood, W. 2004. The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT journal. 58, 4 (2004), 319–326.
[182]
Lockyer Willis, Jane 1996. A framework for task-based learning. Longman.
[183]
Lockyer Willis, Jane and Willis, Dave 1996. Challenge and change in language teaching. Heinemann.
[184]
Lockyer Willis, Jane and Willis, Dave 1996. Challenge and change in language teaching. Heinemann.
[185]
Lockyer Willis, Jane and Willis, Dave 1996. Challenge and change in language teaching. Heinemann.
[186]
Lockyer Willis, Jane and Willis, Dave 1996. Challenge and change in language teaching. Heinemann.
[187]
Lockyer Willis, Jane and Willis, Dave 1996. Challenge and change in language teaching. Heinemann.
[188]
Long, Michael H. and Doughty, Catherine 2009. The handbook of language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell.
[189]
Macalister, J. 2011. Today’s teaching, tomorrow’s text: exploring the teaching of reading. ELT Journal. 65, 2 (Apr. 2011), 161–169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq023.
[190]
Macaro, Ernesto 2003. Teaching and learning a second language: a review of recent research. Continuum.
[191]
Mallinson, C. et al. 2011. A Conceptual Framework for Promoting Linguistic and Educational Change. Language and Linguistics Compass. 5, 7 (2011), 441–453.
[192]
Mark A. Clarke 1994. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL Quarterly. 28, 1 (1994), 9–26.
[193]
Mark A. Clarke 1994. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL Quarterly. 28, 1 (1994), 9–26.
[194]
Markee, Numa 1997. Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge University Press.
[195]
Master, Peter Antony and Brinton, Donna 1998. New ways in English for specific purposes. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages,  Inc.
[196]
McClure, J. 2001. Developing language skills and learner autonomy in international postgraduates. ELT Journal. 55, 2 (Apr. 2001), 142–148. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.142.
[197]
McClure, J. 2001. Developing language skills and learner autonomy in international postgraduates. ELT journal. 55, 2 (2001), 142–148.
[198]
McDevitt, B. 2004. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT Journal. 58, 1 (Jan. 2004), 3–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.1.3.
[199]
McDevitt, B. 2004. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT journal. 58, 1 (2004), 3–9.
[200]
McDevitt, B. 2004. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT Journal. 58, 1 (Jan. 2004), 3–9. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/58.1.3.
[201]
McDevitt, B. 2004. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT journal. 58, 1 (2004), 3–9.
[202]
McDonough, K. and Chaikitmongkol, W. 2007. Teachers’ and Learners’ Reactions to a Task-Based EFL Course in Thailand. TESOL quarterly. 41, 1 (2007), 107–132.
[203]
McGrath, Ian 2002. Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh University Press.
[204]
McGroarty, M. 2004. EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, (Mar. 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000182.
[205]
Mei-Yun  Ko A case study of an EFL teacher’s critical literacy teaching in a reading class in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research. 17, 1, 91–108.
[206]
Murray, Denise E. 2008. Planning change, changing plans: innovations in second language teaching. University of Michigan Press.
[207]
Myskow, G. and Gordon, K. 2010. A focus on purpose: using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT Journal. 64, 3 (Jul. 2010), 283–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp057.
[208]
Ning, H. 2011. Adapting cooperative learning in tertiary ELT. ELT Journal. 65, 1 (2011), 60–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq021.
[209]
Nitta, R. 2005. Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal. 59, 1 (Jan. 2005), 3–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci001.
[210]
Nitta, R. 2005. Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal. 59, 1 (Jan. 2005), 3–13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci001.
[211]
Nitta, R. and Gardner, S. 2005. Consciousness raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT journal. 59, 1 (2005), 3–13.
[212]
Nitta, R. and Gardner, S. 2005. Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT journal. 59, 1 (2005), 3–13.
[213]
Norton, Bonny and Toohey, Kelleen 2004. Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge University Press.
[214]
Nunan, David 1988. Syllabus design. Oxford University Press.
[215]
Nunan, David 1988. The learner-centred curriculum: a study in second language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
[216]
Nunan, David and Carter, Ronald 2001. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.
[217]
Nunan, David and Carter, Ronald 2001. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge University Press.
[218]
O’Brien, T. 2004. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching. 37, 1 (Jan. 2004), 1–28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444804002113.
[219]
O’Brien, T. 2004. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language teaching. 37, 1 (2004), 1–28.
[220]
Ortega, Lourdes 2009. Understanding second language acquisition. Hodder Education.
[221]
Palfreyman, David et al. 2003. Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
[222]
Palfreyman, David et al. 2003. Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
[223]
Palfreyman, David and Smith, Richard C. 2003. Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
[224]
Palfreyman, David and Smith, Richard C. 2003. Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.
[225]
Paltridge, Brian 2012. Discourse analysis: an introduction. Blomsbury Academic.
[226]
P.C So, B. 2005. From analysis to pedagogic applications: using newspaper genres to write school genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 4, 1 (2005), 67–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.004.
[227]
Peacock, M. 1997. The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal. 51, 2 (Apr. 1997), 144–156. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/51.2.144.
[228]
Peacock, M. 1997. The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT journal. 51, 2 (1997), 144–156.
[229]
Peter Antony Master Responses to ESP: English for Specific Purposes. San José State University, 1998.
[230]
Porto, M. 2010. Culturally responsive L2 education: an awareness-raising proposal. ELT Journal. 64, 1 (Jan. 2010), 45–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp021.
[231]
Pride, J. B. and Holmes, Janet 1972. Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Penguin.
[232]
Purcell-Gates, V. et al. 2007. Learning to Read and Write Genre-Specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching. Reading research quarterly. 42, 1 (2007), 8–45.
[233]
Rao, Z. 2002. Chinese students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. System. 30, 1 (2002), 85–105. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00050-1.
[234]
Rao, Z. 2002. Chinese students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. System: an international journal of educational technology and  applied linguistics. 30, 1 (2002), 85–105.
[235]
Rao, Z. 2007. Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal. 61, 2 (Apr. 2007), 100–106. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccm002.
[236]
Reid, J. 1992. A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in english discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. 1, 2 (1992), 79–107. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/1060-3743(92)90010-M.
[237]
Ricento, T.K. and Hornberger, N.H. 1996. Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional. TESOL quarterly. 30, 3 (1996), 401–427.
[238]
Richards, J.C. 2006. Materials Development and Research--Making the Connection. RELC Journal. 37, 1 (Apr. 2006), 5–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206063470.
[239]
Richards, J.C. 2006. Materials Development and Research—Making the Connection. RELC journal. 37, 1 (2006), 5–26.
[240]
Roca de Larios, J. et al. 2008. The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing. 17, 1 (2008), 30–47. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005.
[241]
Rocha‐Schmid, E. 2010. Participatory pedagogy for empowerment: a critical discourse analysis of teacher–parents’ interactions in a family literacy course in London. International Journal of Lifelong Education. 29, 3 (May 2010), 343–358. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/02601371003700659.
[242]
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations. Free Press.
[243]
Schleppegrell, Mary and Colombi, Cecilia 2002. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[244]
Schleppegrell, Mary and Colombi, Cecilia 2002. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[245]
Scott A. Crossley, Max M. Louwerse, Philip M. McCarthy and Danielle S. McNamara 2007. A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts. The Modern Language Journal. 91, 1 (2007), 15–30.
[246]
SCOTTON, CAROL MYERS; BERNSTEN, JANICE Natural Conversations as a Model for Textbook Dialogue. Applied Linguistics. 9, 4, 372-384-372–384.
[247]
SCOTTON, CAROL MYERS; BERNSTEN, JANICE 1988. Natural Conversations as a Model for Textbook Dialogue. Applied linguistics. 9, 4 (1988), 372–384.
[248]
Seedhouse, P. 1995. Needs analysis and the general English classroom. ELT journal. 49, 1 (1995), 59–65.
[249]
Seidlhofer, Barbara 2003. Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford University Press.
[250]
Silva, T. 1993. Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications. TESOL quarterly. 27, 4 (1993), 657–677.
[251]
Silva, T. and Brice, C. 2004. Research in Teaching Writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 24, (Mar. 2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000042.
[252]
Silva, T. and Brice, C. 2004. Research in Teaching Writing. Annual review of applied linguistics. 24, (2004), 70–106.
[253]
Spelman Miller, Kristyan et al. 2002. Unity and diversity in language use: selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Reading, September 2001. Continuum.
[254]
Spelman Miller, Kristyan et al. 2002. Unity and diversity in language use: selected papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, held at the University of Reading, September 2001. British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Continuum.
[255]
Spolsky, Bernard 1989. Conditions for second language learning: introduction to a general  theory. Oxford University Press.
[256]
Stapleton, P. and Radia, P. 2010. Tech-era L2 writing: towards a new kind of process. ELT Journal. 64, 2 (Apr. 2010), 175–183. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp038.
[257]
Stevenson, M. et al. 2006. Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing. 15, 3 (2006), 201–233. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002.
[258]
Stevick, Earl W. 1989. Success with foreign languages: seven who achieved it and what  worked for them. Prentice Hall International.
[259]
Swales, John Episodes in ESP: a source and reference book on the development of  English for science and technology. Pergamon.
[260]
Swales, John M. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
[261]
Swan, M. 2005. Legislation by hypothesis; the case of task based instruction. Applied linguistics. 26, 3 (2005), 376–401.
[262]
Swan, M. 2005. Legislation by hypothesis; the case of task based instruction. Applied linguistics. 26, 3 (2005), 376–401.
[263]
Swan, M. 2005. Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction. Applied Linguistics. 26, 3 (Sep. 2005), 376–401. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami013.
[264]
Swan, M. 2005. Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction. Applied Linguistics. 26, 3 (Sep. 2005), 376–401. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami013.
[265]
Taki, S. 2008. International and local curricula: The question of ideology. Language Teaching Research. 12, 1 (Jan. 2008), 127–142. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168807084503.
[266]
Tan, K.E. and Miller, J. 2007. Writing in English in Malaysian High Schools: The Discourse of Examinations. Language and Education. 21, 2 (Mar. 2007), 124–140. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2167/le663.0.
[267]
Thomas K. Ricento and Nancy H. Hornberger 1996. Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional. TESOL Quarterly. 30, 3 (1996), 401–427.
[268]
Thorsten TH Huth ,  Carmen CT Taleghani-Nikazm How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research. 10, 1, 53–79.
[269]
Tomlinson, B. and Dat, B. 2004. The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to ELT methodology. Language Teaching Research. 8, 2 (May 2004), 199–222. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168804lr140oa.
[270]
Tomlinson, B. and Dat, B. 2004. The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to ELT methodology. Language teaching research. 8, 2 (2004), 199–222.
[271]
Tomlinson, Brian 2013. Developing materials for language teaching. Bloomsbury Academic.
[272]
Tomlinson, Brian 2008. English language learning materials: a critical review. Continuum.
[273]
Tomlinson, Brian 2010. English language learning materials: a critical review. Continuum.
[274]
Tomlinson, Brian 2008. English language learning materials: a critical review. Continuum.
[275]
Tomlinson, Brian 2010. English language learning materials: a critical review. Continuum.
[276]
Tomlinson, Brian 2011. Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
[277]
Tomlinson, Brian 1998. Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press.
[278]
Tony Silva 1993. Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications. TESOL Quarterly. 27, 4 (1993), 657–677.
[279]
Tribble, C. and British Council 2012. Managing change in English language teaching: lessons from experience. British Council.
[280]
Van Lier, L. 1998. The Relationship Between Consciousness, Interaction and Language Learning. Language awareness. 7, 2–3 (1998), 128–145.
[281]
Victoria Purcell-Gates, Nell K. Duke and Joseph A. Martineau 2007. Learning to Read and Write Genre-Specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching. Reading Research Quarterly. 42, 1 (2007), 8–45.
[282]
Wallace, Catherine 2003. Critical reading in language education. Palgrave Macmillan.
[283]
Wang, W. and Wen, Q. 2002. L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing. 11, 3 (2002), 225–246. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00084-X.
[284]
Waters, A. 2009. Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching. 42, 04 (Oct. 2009). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480999005X.
[285]
Waters, A. and Vilches, Ma.L.C. 2008. Factors Affecting ELT Reforms: The Case of the Philippines Basic Education Curriculum. RELC Journal. 39, 1 (Apr. 2008), 5–24. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208091138.
[286]
Weber, J.-J. 2001. A concordance- and genre-informed approach to ESP essay writing. ELT Journal. 55, 1 (Jan. 2001), 14–20. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.1.14.
[287]
Weber, J.-J. 2001. A concordance- and genre-informed approach to ESP essay writing. ELT journal. 55, 1 (2001), 14–20.
[288]
Wedell, Martin 2009. Planning for educational change: putting people and their contexts first. Continuum.
[289]
Wedell, Martin 2009. Planning for educational change: putting people and their contexts first. Continuum.
[290]
Wette, R. 2011. Product-process distinctions in ELT curriculum theory and practice. ELT Journal. 65, 2 (Apr. 2011), 136–144. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq022.
[291]
Wharton, S. 2011. Critical text analysis: linking language and cultural studies. ELT Journal. 65, 3 (Jul. 2011), 221–229. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccq068.
[292]
Wharton, S. 2012. Epistemological and interpersonal stance in a data description task: Findings from a discipline-specific learner corpus. English for Specific Purposes. 31, 4 (2012), 261–270. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.005.
[293]
Wharton, S. 2007. Social identity and parallel text dynamics in the reporting of educational action research. English for Specific Purposes. 26, 4 (2007), 485–501. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.003.
[294]
Wharton, S. 2006. Ways of constructing knowledge in TESOL research reports: The management of community consensus and individual innovation. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 44, 1 (Jan. 2006), 23–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.002.
[295]
Wharton, S. 2006. Ways of constructing knowledge in TESOL research reports: The management of community consensus and individual innovation. IRAL. 44, 1 (2006), 23–48.
[296]
White, Ronald V. 1988. The ELT curriculum: design, innovation and management. Basil Blackwell.
[297]
Widdowson, H. G. 1990. Aspects of language teaching. Oxford University Press.
[298]
Widdowson, H. G. 2003. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
[299]
Widdowson, H. G. 2003. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
[300]
Widdowson, H. G. 2003. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
[301]
WILLIAMS, M. 1988. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied linguistics. 9, 1 (1988), 45–58.
[302]
WILLIAMS, M. 1988. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied Linguistics. 9, 1 (Mar. 1988), 45–58. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/9.1.45.
[303]
WILLIAMS, M. 1988. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied linguistics. 9, 1 (1988), 45–58.
[304]
WILLIAMS, MARION Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied Linguistics. 9, 1, 45-58-45–58.
[305]
Wong Fillmore, L. and E. Snow, C. What Teachers Need to Know About Language. Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.
[306]
Wong, J. 2002. ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL. 40, 1 (2002), 37–60.
[307]
Wong, Jean 2002. ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching. 40, 1 (2002), 37–60.
[308]
Wong Mei Ha, H. and Storey, P. 2006. Knowing and Doing in the ESL Writing Class. Language Awareness. 15, 4 (Nov. 2006), 283–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2167/la365/0.
[309]
Wong Mei Ha, H. and Storey, P. 2006. Knowing and Doing in the ESL Writing Class. Language awareness. 15, 4 (2006), 283–300.
[310]
Wong, V. et al. 1995. The use of authentic materials at tertiary level. ELT journal. 49, 4 (1995), 318–322.
[311]
Wong, Viola; Kwok, Peony; Choi, Nancy The use of authentic materials at tertiary level. ELT Journal. 49, 4, 318-322-318–322.
[312]
Woodward, Tessa 2001. Planning lessons and courses: designing sequences of work for the  language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
[313]
Xu Fang and Mark Warschauer 2004. Technology and Curricular Reform in China: A Case Study. TESOL Quarterly. 38, 2 (2004), 301–323.
[314]
Xuesong, G. 2006. Strategies Used by Chinese Parents to Support English Language Learning: Voices of ‘Elite’ University Students. RELC Journal. 37, 3 (Dec. 2006), 285–298. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206071302.
[315]
Xuesong, G. 2006. Strategies Used by Chinese Parents to Support English Language Learning Voices of ‘Elite’ University Students. RELC journal. 37, 3 (2006), 285–298.
[316]
Yi, Y. 2007. Engaging literacy: A biliterate student’s composing practices beyond school. Journal of Second Language Writing. 16, 1 (2007), 23–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.03.001.
[317]
Young, J. 2000. Comment: who needs analysis? ELT Journal. 54, 1 (Jan. 2000), 72–74. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.1.72.
[318]
Young, J. 2000. Comment: Who needs analysis? ELT journal. 54, 1 (2000), 72–74.
[319]
Yuk-chun Lee, W. 1995. Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT journal. 49, 4 (1995), 323–328.
[320]
1997. Applied languages. Universitat de València, Servei de Publicacions.
[321]
1998. Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT journal. 52, 1 (1998), 43–56.