1
Akbari R. Transforming lives: introducing critical pedagogy into ELT classrooms. ELT Journal 2007;62:276–83. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn025
2
Bax S. The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT Journal 2003;57:278–87. doi:10.1093/elt/57.3.278
3
Bax S. The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching. ELT journal 2003;57:278–87.
4
Bax S. Bringing context and methodology together. ELT Journal 2003;57:295–6. doi:10.1093/elt/57.3.295
5
Bax S. Bringing context and methodology together. ELT journal 2003;57:295–6.
6
Bell DM. Another breakthrough, another baby thrown out with the bathwater. ELT Journal 2009;63:255–62. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp027
7
Bialostok S. Metaphors for Literacy: A Cultural Model of White, Middle-Class Parents. Linguistics and Education 2002;13:347–71. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(02)00088-8
8
Brown, Tony, Jones, Liz. Action research and postmodernism: congruence and critique. Buckingham [England]: : Open University Press 2001.
9
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
10
Hazen B, Wu, Y, S Sankar, C, et al. A Proposed Framework for Educational Innovation Dissemination. Journal of educational technology systems 2011;Vol. 40:301–21.http://0-web.b.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=b819c108-eafb-42cd-811e-76adf2324ee3%40sessionmgr115&vid=1&hid=121
11
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
12
Chouliaraki, Lilie, Fairclough, Norman. Discourse in late modernity: rethinking critical discourse analysis. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2002.
13
Cots JM. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal 2006;60:336–45. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl024
14
Cots JM. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT journal 2006;60:336–45.
15
Crookes G. The practicality and relevance of second language critical pedagogy. Language Teaching 2010;43:333–48. doi:10.1017/S0261444809990292
16
Dasli M. Reviving the ‘moments’: from cultural awareness and cross‐cultural mediation to critical intercultural language pedagogy. Pedagogy, Culture & Society 2011;19:21–39. doi:10.1080/14681366.2011.527118
17
Derince ZM. Language learning through critical pedagogy in a "Brave New World”. International Review of Education 2011;57:377–95. doi:10.1007/s11159-011-9218-8
18
Tomlinson, Brian. Materials development in language teaching. 2nd ed. Cambridge, N.Y.: : Cambridge University Press 2011. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=305509&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
19
Tomlinson, Brian. Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
20
Ellis G. How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT Journal 1996;50:213–8. doi:10.1093/elt/50.3.213
21
Ellis G. How culturally appropriate is the communicative approach? ELT journal 1996;50:213–8.
22
Gupta D. CLT in India: context and methodology come together. ELT Journal 2004;58:266–9. doi:10.1093/elt/58.3.266
23
Gupta D. CLT in India: context and methodology come together. ELT journal 2004;58:266–9.
24
Harmer J. Popular culture, methods, and context. ELT Journal 2003;57:288–94. doi:10.1093/elt/57.3.288
25
Harmer J. Popular culture, methods, and context. ELT journal 2003;57:288–94.
26
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
27
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
28
Harwood, Nigel. English language teaching materials: theory and practice. New York: : Cambridge University Press 2010.
29
Hu G. ’CLT is best for China’-- an untenable absolutist claim. ELT Journal 2005;59:65–8. doi:10.1093/elt/cci009
30
Hu G. ‘CLT is best for China’— an untenable absolutist claim. ELT journal 2005;59:65–8.
31
Jones JF. Self-access and culture: retreating from autonomy. ELT Journal 1995;49:228–34. doi:10.1093/elt/49.3.228
32
Jones JF. Self-access and culture: retreating from autonomy. ELT journal 1995;49:228–34.
33
Lee I. Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT Journal 1998;52:282–90. doi:10.1093/elt/52.4.282
34
Lee I. Supporting greater autonomy in language learning. ELT journal 1998;52:282–90.
35
Liao X. The need for Communicative Language Teaching in China. ELT Journal 2004;58:270–3. doi:10.1093/elt/58.3.270
36
Liao X. The need for Communicative Language Teaching in China. ELT journal 2004;58:270–3.
37
Johnson, Robert Keith. The second language curriculum. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1989.
38
Littlewood W. The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT Journal 2004;58:319–26. doi:10.1093/elt/58.4.319
39
Littlewood W. The task-based approach: some questions and suggestions. ELT journal 2004;58:319–26.
40
Littlewood W. Process-oriented pedagogy: facilitation, empowerment, or control? ELT Journal 2009;63:246–54. doi:10.1093/elt/ccn054
41
Mallinson C, Hudley AC, Strickling LR, et al. A Conceptual Framework for Promoting Linguistic and Educational Change. Language and Linguistics Compass 2011;5:441–53.
42
McDevitt B. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT Journal 2004;58:3–9. doi:10.1093/elt/58.1.3
43
McDevitt B. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT journal 2004;58:3–9.
44
McClure J. Developing language skills and learner autonomy in international postgraduates. ELT Journal 2001;55:142–8. doi:10.1093/elt/55.2.142
45
McClure J. Developing language skills and learner autonomy in international postgraduates. ELT journal 2001;55:142–8.
46
Norton, Bonny, Toohey, Kelleen. Critical pedagogies and language learning. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2004.
47
Palfreyman, David, Smith, Richard C., Palgrave Connect (Online service). Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. New York: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42628&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
48
Palfreyman, David, Smith, Richard C. Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
49
Porto M. Culturally responsive L2 education: an awareness-raising proposal. ELT Journal 2010;64:45–53. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp021
50
Rao Z. Chinese students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. System 2002;30:85–105. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00050-1
51
Rao Z. Chinese students’ perceptions of communicative and non-communicative activities in EFL classroom. System: an international journal of educational technology and applied linguistics 2002;30:85–105.
52
Rocha‐Schmid E. Participatory pedagogy for empowerment: a critical discourse analysis of teacher–parents’ interactions in a family literacy course in London. International Journal of Lifelong Education 2010;29:343–58. doi:10.1080/02601371003700659
53
Taki S. International and local curricula: The question of ideology. Language Teaching Research 2008;12:127–42. doi:10.1177/1362168807084503
54
Tomlinson, Brian. English language learning materials: a critical review. London: : Continuum 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781441178565
55
Tomlinson, Brian. English language learning materials: a critical review. London: : Continuum 2010.
56
Tomlinson B, Dat B. The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to ELT methodology. Language Teaching Research 2004;8:199–222. doi:10.1191/1362168804lr140oa
57
Tomlinson B, Dat B. The contributions of Vietnamese learners of English to ELT methodology. Language teaching research 2004;8:199–222.
58
Wallace, Catherine. Critical reading in language education. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
59
Wette R. Product-process distinctions in ELT curriculum theory and practice. ELT Journal 2011;65:136–44. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq022
60
Wharton S. Critical text analysis: linking language and cultural studies. ELT Journal 2011;65:221–9. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq068
61
Xuesong G. Strategies Used by Chinese Parents to Support English Language Learning: Voices of ‘Elite’ University Students. RELC Journal 2006;37:285–98. doi:10.1177/0033688206071302
62
Xuesong G. Strategies Used by Chinese Parents to Support English Language Learning Voices of ‘Elite’ University Students. RELC journal 2006;37:285–98.
63
Anderson, Wendy, Corbett, John. Exploring English with online corpora: an introduction. Basingstoke [England]: : Palgrave Macmillan 2009.
64
Anderson W, Corbett J. Teaching English as a friendly language: lessons from the SCOTS corpus. ELT Journal 2010;64:414–23. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp085
65
Boxer D. Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: the case of complaints. ELT Journal 1995;49:44–58. doi:10.1093/elt/49.1.44
66
Boxer D, Pickering L. Problems in the presentation of speech acts in ELT materials: the case of complaints. ELT journal 1995;49:44–58.
67
Bygate M. Applied Linguistics: A Pragmatic Discipline, a Generic Discipline? Applied Linguistics 2005;26:568–81. doi:10.1093/applin/ami032
68
Bygate M. Applied Linguistics: A Pragmatic Discipline, a Generic Discipline? Applied linguistics 2005;26:568–81.
69
Carter R. Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT Journal 1998;52:43–56. doi:10.1093/elt/52.1.43
70
Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication, and culture. ELT journal 1998;52:43–56.
71
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
72
Chen Y-S, Su S-W. A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal 2012;66:184–92. doi:10.1093/elt/ccr061
73
Mark A. Clarke. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL Quarterly 1994;28:9–26.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3587196
74
Clarke MA. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL quarterly 1994;28:9–26.
75
Cook G. The uses of reality: a reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal 1998;52:57–63. doi:10.1093/elt/52.1.57
76
Cook G. The uses of reality: a reply to Ronald Carter. ELT journal 1998;52:57–63.
77
Cots JM. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT Journal 2006;60:336–45. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl024
78
Cots JM. Teaching ‘with an attitude’: Critical Discourse Analysis in EFL teaching. ELT journal 2006;60:336–45.
79
Scott A. Crossley, Max M. Louwerse, Philip M. McCarthy and Danielle S. McNamara. A Linguistic Analysis of Simplified and Authentic Texts. The Modern Language Journal 2007;91:15–30.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4127085
80
Ellis R. Second language acquisition, teacher education and language pedagogy. Language Teaching 2010;43. doi:10.1017/S0261444809990139
81
Gavioli L. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal 2001;55:238–46. doi:10.1093/elt/55.3.238
82
Gavioli L, Aston G. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT journal 2001;55:238–46.
83
Gilmore A. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal 2004;58:363–74. doi:10.1093/elt/58.4.363
84
Gilmore A. A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT journal 2004;58:363–74.
85
Gilmore A. Authentic materials and authenticity in foreign language learning. Language Teaching 2007;40. doi:10.1017/S0261444807004144
86
Guariento W. Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT Journal 2001;55:347–53. doi:10.1093/elt/55.4.347
87
Guariento W, Morley J. Text and task authenticity in the EFL classroom. ELT journal 2001;55:347–53.
88
Eli Hinkel. Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL Quarterly 2006;40:109–31.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40264513
89
Hinkel E. Current Perspectives on Teaching the Four Skills. TESOL quarterly 2006;40:109–31.
90
Hoey, Michael. Lexical priming: a new theory of words and language. London: : Routledge/AHRB 2005. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=15624&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
91
Hoey, Michael. Lexical priming: a new theory of words and language. London: : Routledge 2005.
92
HOLMES, JANET. Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks. Applied Linguistics;9:21-44-21–44.http://0-www.jiscjournalarchives.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/openurl.html?ref=oup/applij/applij_9_1.pdf/21.pdf
93
HOLMES J. Doubt and Certainty in ESL Textbooks. Applied linguistics 1988;9:51–44.
94
Huang L-S. Corpus-aided language learning. ELT Journal 2011;65:481–4. doi:10.1093/elt/ccr031
95
Pride, J. B., Holmes, Janet. Sociolinguistics: selected readings. Harmondsworth: : Penguin 1972.
96
Koprowski M. Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT Journal 2005;59:322–32. doi:10.1093/elt/cci061
97
Koprowski M. Investigating the usefulness of lexical phrases in contemporary coursebooks. ELT journal 2005;59:322–32.
98
Lee WY -c. Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT Journal 1995;49:323–8. doi:10.1093/elt/49.4.323
99
Yuk-chun Lee W. Authenticity revisited: text authenticity and learner authenticity. ELT journal 1995;49:323–8.
100
Myskow G, Gordon K. A focus on purpose: using a genre approach in an EFL writing class. ELT Journal 2010;64:283–92. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp057
101
Nunan, David. The learner-centred curriculum: a study in second language teaching. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1988.
102
Paltridge, Brian. Discourse analysis: an introduction. 2nd ed. London: : Blomsbury Academic 2012.
103
Peacock M. The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT Journal 1997;51:144–56. doi:10.1093/elt/51.2.144
104
Peacock M. The effect of authentic materials on the motivation of EFL learners. ELT journal 1997;51:144–56.
105
SCOTTON, CAROL MYERS; BERNSTEN, JANICE. Natural Conversations as a Model for Textbook Dialogue. Applied Linguistics;9:372-384-372–84.http://0-www.jiscjournalarchives.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/openurl.html?ref=oup/applij/applij_9_4.pdf/372.pdf
106
SCOTTON, CAROL MYERS; BERNSTEN, JANICE. Natural Conversations as a Model for Textbook Dialogue. Applied linguistics 1988;9:372–84.
107
Seidlhofer, Barbara. Controversies in applied linguistics. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
108
Hoey, Michael. Text, discourse and corpora: theory and analysis. London: : Continuum 2007. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781441194855
109
Hoey, Michael. Text, discourse and corpora: theory and analysis. London: : Continuum 2007.
110
Tomlinson, Brian. English language learning materials: a critical review. London: : Continuum 2008. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781441178565
111
Tomlinson, Brian. English language learning materials: a critical review. London: : Continuum 2010.
112
Wharton S. Epistemological and interpersonal stance in a data description task: Findings from a discipline-specific learner corpus. English for Specific Purposes 2012;31:261–70. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2012.05.005
113
WILLIAMS, MARION. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied Linguistics;9:45-58-45–58.http://0-www.jiscjournalarchives.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/openurl.html?ref=oup/applij/applij_9_1.pdf/45.pdf
114
WILLIAMS M. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied linguistics 1988;9:45–58.
115
Widdowson, H. G. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
116
Jane Willis and Dave Willis – Willis-ELT. http://www.willis-elt.co.uk/conferences.html
117
Wong, Jean. ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 2002;40:37–60.http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=ehh&AN=7047226&site=ehost-live
118
Wong J. ‘Applying’ conversation analysis in applied linguistics: Evaluating dialogue in English as a second language textbooks. IRAL 2002;40:37–60.
119
Wong, Viola; Kwok, Peony; Choi, Nancy. The use of authentic materials at tertiary level. ELT Journal;49:318-322-318–22.http://0-www.jiscjournalarchives.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/openurl.html?ref=oup/eltj/eltj_49_4.pdf/318.pdf
120
Wong V, Kwok P, Choi N. The use of authentic materials at tertiary level. ELT journal 1995;49:318–22.
121
Graves, Kathleen. Teachers as course developers. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
122
McGroarty M. EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2004;24. doi:10.1017/S0267190504000182
123
Bourke JM. Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT Journal 2006;60:279–86. doi:10.1093/elt/ccl008
124
Bourke JM. Designing a topic-based syllabus for young learners. ELT journal 2006;60:279–86.
125
Ellis R. Designing a Task-Based Syllabus. RELC Journal 2003;34:64–81. doi:10.1177/003368820303400105
126
Ellis R. Designing a task based syllabus. RELC journal 2003;34:64–81.
127
Gavioli L. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT Journal 2001;55:238–46. doi:10.1093/elt/55.3.238
128
Gavioli L, Aston G. Enriching reality: language corpora in language pedagogy. ELT journal 2001;55:238–46.
129
Johnston B, Peterson S. The program matrix: A conceptual framework for language programs. System 1994;22:63–80.http://0-www.sciencedirect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/science/article/pii/0346251X94900418
130
Johnston B, Peterson S. The program matrix: A conceptual framework for language programs. System: an international journal of educational technology and applied linguistics 1994;22:63–80.
131
Macaro, Ernesto. Teaching and learning a second language: a review of recent research. London: : Continuum 2003.
132
Kim McDonough and Wanpen Chaikitmongkol. Teachers’ and Learners’ Reactions to a Task-Based EFL Course in Thailand. TESOL Quarterly 2007;41:107–32.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40264333
133
McDonough K, Chaikitmongkol W. Teachers’ and Learners’ Reactions to a Task-Based EFL Course in Thailand. TESOL quarterly 2007;41:107–32.
134
McDevitt B. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT Journal 2004;58:3–9. doi:10.1093/elt/58.1.3
135
McDevitt B. Negotiating the syllabus: a win-win situation? ELT journal 2004;58:3–9.
136
McGrath, Ian. Materials evaluation and design for language teaching. Edinburgh: : Edinburgh University Press 2002.
137
Nunan, David. Syllabus design. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1988.
138
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
139
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
140
Thomas K. Ricento and Nancy H. Hornberger. Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional. TESOL Quarterly 1996;30:401–27.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3587691
141
Ricento TK, Hornberger NH. Unpeeling the Onion: Language Planning and Policy and the ELT Professional. TESOL quarterly 1996;30:401–27.
142
Tomlinson, Brian. Developing materials for language teaching. Second edition. London: : Bloomsbury Academic 2013.
143
White, Ronald V. The ELT curriculum: design, innovation and management. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1988.
144
Widdowson, H. G. Aspects of language teaching. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1990.
145
Woodward, Tessa. Planning lessons and courses: designing sequences of work for the language classroom. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
146
Ellis R. Designing a Task-Based Syllabus. RELC Journal 2003;34:64–81. doi:10.1177/003368820303400105
147
Ellis R. Designing a Task-Based Syllabus. RELC journal 2003;34:64–81.
148
Forey G. Workplace texts: do they mean the same for teachers and business people? English for Specific Purposes 2004;23:447–69. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2004.01.003
149
Gray K. Syllabus design for the general class: what happens to theory when you apply it. ELT journal 1990;44:261–71.
150
Green C. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT Journal 2005;59:306–11. doi:10.1093/elt/cci059
151
Green C. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT journal 2005;59:306–11.
152
Hodge R, Pitt K, Barton D. ‘This is not enough for one’s life’: perceptions of living and learning English in Blackburn by students seeking asylum and refugee status. Working Papers. ;Working paper 4.http://www.literacy.lancs.ac.uk/workpapers/wp04-hodge-&-pitt-this-is-not-enough.pdf
153
Holme R, Chalauisaeng B. The learner as needs analyst: The use of participatory appraisal in the EAP reading classroom. English for Specific Purposes 2006;25:403–19. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.01.003
154
Thorsten TH Huth , Carmen CT Taleghani-Nikazm. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language Teaching Research;10:53–79.http://0-ejournals.ebsco.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/Article.asp?ContributionID=10408191
155
Huth TT, Taleghani-Nikazm CC. How can insights from conversation analysis be directly applied to teaching L2 pragmatics? Language teaching research 2006;10:53–79.
156
Nitta R. Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal 2005;59:3–13. doi:10.1093/elt/cci001
157
Nitta R, Gardner S. Consciousness raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT journal 2005;59:3–13.
158
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
159
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
160
Palfreyman, David, Smith, Richard C., Palgrave Connect (Online service). Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. New York: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42628&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
161
Palfreyman, David, Smith, Richard C. Learner autonomy across cultures: language education perspectives. Basingstoke: : Palgrave Macmillan 2003.
162
Seedhouse P. Needs analysis and the general English classroom. ELT journal 1995;49:59–65.
163
Swan M. Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction. Applied Linguistics 2005;26:376–401. doi:10.1093/applin/ami013
164
Swan M. Legislation by hypothesis; the case of task based instruction. Applied linguistics 2005;26:376–401.
165
Graves, Kathleen. Teachers as course developers. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1996.
166
Applied languages. Valencia: : Universitat de ValeÌncia, Servei de Publicacions 1997.
167
Widdowson, H. G. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
168
WILLIAMS M. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied Linguistics 1988;9:45–58. doi:10.1093/applin/9.1.45
169
WILLIAMS M. Language Taught for Meetings and Language Used in Meetings: Is there Anything in Common? Applied linguistics 1988;9:45–58.
170
Young J. Comment: who needs analysis? ELT Journal 2000;54:72–4. doi:10.1093/elt/54.1.72
171
Young J. Comment: Who needs analysis? ELT journal 2000;54:72–4.
172
Ahlquist S. ‘Storyline’: a task-based approach for the young learner classroom. ELT Journal 2013;67:41–51. doi:10.1093/elt/ccs052
173
Guth S, Helm F. Developing multiliteracies in ELT through telecollaboration. ELT Journal 2012;66:42–51. doi:10.1093/elt/ccr027
174
Ning H. Adapting cooperative learning in tertiary ELT. ELT Journal 2011;65:60–70. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq021
175
Cullen R. Teaching grammar as a liberating force. ELT Journal 2007;62:221–30. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm042
176
Gibson S. Reading aloud: a useful learning tool? ELT Journal 2008;62:29–36. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm075
177
Spelman Miller, Kristyan, Thompson, Paul, British Association for Applied Linguistics. Unity and diversity in language use: selected papers from the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics held at the University of Reading, September 2001. New York: : Continuum 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781847141323
178
Spelman Miller, Kristyan, Thompson, Paul, British Association for Applied Linguistics. Unity and diversity in language use: selected papers from the Annual Meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, held at the University of Reading, September 2001. London: : British Association for Applied Linguistics in association with Continuum 2002.
179
Hoey, Michael, Scott, Mike, Thompson, Geoff. Patterns of text: in honour of Michael Hoey. Amsterdam: : John Benjamins Pub. Co 2001. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9789027298492
180
Hoey, Michael, Scott, Mike, Thompson, Geoff. Patterns of text: in honour of Michael Hoey. Amsterdam: : John Benjamins Pub. Co 2001.
181
Wharton S. Ways of constructing knowledge in TESOL research reports: The management of community consensus and individual innovation. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 2006;44:23–48. doi:10.1515/IRAL.2006.002
182
Wharton S. Ways of constructing knowledge in TESOL research reports: The management of community consensus and individual innovation. IRAL 2006;44:23–48.
183
Wharton S. Social identity and parallel text dynamics in the reporting of educational action research. English for Specific Purposes 2007;26:485–501. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.09.003
184
Brown, H. Douglas. Principles of language learning and teaching. 5th ed. White Plains, NY: : Pearson Longman 2007.
185
Mark A. Clarke. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL Quarterly 1994;28:9–26.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3587196
186
Clarke MA. The Dysfunctions of the Theory/Practice Discourse. TESOL quarterly 1994;28:9–26.
187
Edge J. Research and its agenda. TESOL matters 2000;11.
188
Ellis, Rod. Instructed second language acquisition: learning in the classroom. Oxford: : Basil Blackwell 1990.
189
Ellis, Rod. Talking shop: Second language acquisition research: how does it help teachers? ELT Journal;47:3-11-3–11.http://0-www.jiscjournalarchives.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/openurl.html?ref=oup/eltj/eltj_47_1.pdf/3.pdf
190
Ellis R. Talking shop: second language acquisition research: How does it help teachers? ELT journal 1993;47:3–11.
191
Ellis, Rod. The study of second language acquisition. 2nd ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2008.
192
Erlam R. What Do You Researchers Know about Language Teaching? Bridging the Gap Between SLA Research and Language Pedagogy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching 2008;2:253–67. doi:10.1080/17501220802158958
193
Green C. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT Journal 2005;59:306–11. doi:10.1093/elt/cci059
194
Green C. Integrating extensive reading in the task-based curriculum. ELT journal 2005;59:306–11.
195
Hopkins D, Nettle M. Second language acquisition research: a response to Rod. ELT journal 1994;48:157–61.
196
Johnstone R. Research on language teaching and learning: 2001. Language Teaching 2002;35. doi:10.1017/S0261444802001799
197
Johnstone R. Research on language teaching and learning in 2001. Language teaching 2002;35:157–81.
198
Lockyer Willis, Jane, Willis, Dave. Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: : Heinemann 1996.
199
Lightbown P. Anniversary article. Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied Linguistics 2000;21:431–62. doi:10.1093/applin/21.4.431
200
Lightbown P. Anniversary article. Classroom SLA research and second language teaching. Applied linguistics 2000;21:431–62.
201
Ortega, Lourdes. Understanding second language acquisition. London: : Hodder Education 2009.
202
Nitta R. Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT Journal 2005;59:3–13. doi:10.1093/elt/cci001
203
Nitta R, Gardner S. Consciousness-raising and practice in ELT coursebooks. ELT journal 2005;59:3–13.
204
Richards JC. Materials Development and Research--Making the Connection. RELC Journal 2006;37:5–26. doi:10.1177/0033688206063470
205
Richards JC. Materials Development and Research—Making the Connection. RELC journal 2006;37:5–26.
206
Lockyer Willis, Jane, Willis, Dave. Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: : Heinemann 1996.
207
Spolsky, Bernard. Conditions for second language learning: introduction to a general theory. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 1989.
208
Stevick, Earl W. Success with foreign languages: seven who achieved it and what worked for them. London: : Prentice Hall International 1989.
209
Swan M. Legislation by Hypothesis: The Case of Task-Based Instruction. Applied Linguistics 2005;26:376–401. doi:10.1093/applin/ami013
210
Swan M. Legislation by hypothesis; the case of task based instruction. Applied linguistics 2005;26:376–401.
211
Lier LV. The Relationship Between Consciousness, Interaction and Language Learning. Language Awareness 1998;7:128–45. doi:10.1080/09658419808667105
212
Van Lier L. The Relationship Between Consciousness, Interaction and Language Learning. Language awareness 1998;7:128–45.
213
Widdowson, H. G. Defining issues in English language teaching. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
214
Lockyer Willis, Jane. A framework for task-based learning. Harlow, Essex: : Longman 1996.
215
Lockyer Willis, Jane, Willis, Dave. Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: : Heinemann 1996.
216
Atkinson D. L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003;12:3–15. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00123-6
217
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 2000;54:153–60. doi:10.1093/elt/54.2.153
218
Badger R, White G. A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal 2000;54:153–60.
219
Beck SW. Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing. Research in the Teaching of English 2006;40:413–60.http://0-www.ncte.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/library/NCTEFiles/Resources/Journals/RTE/0404-may06/RT0404Subjectivity.pdf
220
Beck SW. Subjectivity and intersubjectivity in the teaching and learning of writing. Research in the teaching of English 2006;40:413–60.
221
Chen Y-S, Su S-W. A genre-based approach to teaching EFL summary writing. ELT Journal 2012;66:184–92. doi:10.1093/elt/ccr061
222
Cheng YS. A measure of second language writing anxiety: Scale development and preliminary validation. Journal of Second Language Writing 2004;13:313–35. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2004.07.001
223
Cheng A. Transferring generic features and recontextualizing genre awareness: Understanding writing performance in the ESP genre-based literacy framework. English for Specific Purposes 2007;26:287–307. doi:10.1016/j.esp.2006.12.002
224
Grabe, William, Kaplan, Robert B. Theory and practice of writing: an applied linguistic perspective. London: : Longman 1996.
225
Wong Mei Ha H, Storey P. Knowing and Doing in the ESL Writing Class. Language Awareness 2006;15:283–300. doi:10.2167/la365/0
226
Wong Mei Ha H, Storey P. Knowing and Doing in the ESL Writing Class. Language awareness 2006;15:283–300.
227
Eli EH Hinkel. Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research;8:5–29.http://0-ejournals.ebsco.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/Article.asp?ContributionID=10407889
228
EH Hinkel E. Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language teaching research 2004;8:5–29.
229
Hirose K. Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003;12:181–209. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(03)00015-8
230
Hirose K. Pursuing the complexity of the relationship between L1 and L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006;15:142–6. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.04.002
231
Hyland, Ken. Teaching and researching writing. 2nd ed. Harlow: : Longman 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781408205150
232
Hyland, Ken. Teaching and researching writing. Harlow: : Longman 2002.
233
Hyland K. Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 2003;12:17–29. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8
234
Keck C. The use of paraphrase in summary writing: A comparison of L1 and L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006;15:261–78. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.006
235
Kim E-Y. Using translation exercises in the communicative EFL writing classroom. ELT Journal 2011;65:154–60. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq039
236
Mei-Yun Ko. A case study of an EFL teacher’s critical literacy teaching in a reading class in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research;17:91–108.http://0-ejournals.ebsco.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/Article.asp?ContributionID=29314440
237
Kroll, Barbara. Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. Cambridge, U.K.: : Cambridge University Press 2003.
238
Lee H-C. The reading response e-journal: An alternative way to engage low-achieving EFL students. Language Teaching Research 2013;17:111–31. doi:10.1177/1362168812457539
239
Lee Y-J. The process-oriented ESL writing assessment: Promises and challenges. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006;15:307–30. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.003
240
Macalister J. Today’s teaching, tomorrow’s text: exploring the teaching of reading. ELT Journal 2011;65:161–9. doi:10.1093/elt/ccq023
241
O’Brien T. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language Teaching 2004;37:1–28. doi:10.1017/S0261444804002113
242
O’Brien T. Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning. Language teaching 2004;37:1–28.
243
Victoria Purcell-Gates, Nell K. Duke and Joseph A. Martineau. Learning to Read and Write Genre-Specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching. Reading Research Quarterly 2007;42:8–45.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4151702
244
Purcell-Gates V, Duke NK, Martineau JA. Learning to Read and Write Genre-Specific Text: Roles of Authentic Experience and Explicit Teaching. Reading research quarterly 2007;42:8–45.
245
Rao Z. Training in brainstorming and developing writing skills. ELT Journal 2007;61:100–6. doi:10.1093/elt/ccm002
246
Reid J. A computer text analysis of four cohesion devices in english discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 1992;1:79–107. doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90010-M
247
Roca de Larios J, Manchon R, Murphy L, et al. The foreign language writer’s strategic behaviour in the allocation of time to writing processes. Journal of Second Language Writing 2008;17:30–47. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.08.005
248
Schleppegrell, Mary, Colombi, Cecilia. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781410612298
249
Schleppegrell, Mary, Colombi, Cecilia. Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: meaning with power. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2002.
250
Tony Silva. Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications. TESOL Quarterly 1993;27:657–77.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3587400
251
Silva T. Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications. TESOL quarterly 1993;27:657–77.
252
Silva T, Brice C. Research in Teaching Writing. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2004;24. doi:10.1017/S0267190504000042
253
Silva T, Brice C. Research in Teaching Writing. Annual review of applied linguistics 2004;24:70–106.
254
P.C So B. From analysis to pedagogic applications: using newspaper genres to write school genres. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2005;4:67–82. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2004.02.004
255
Stapleton P, Radia P. Tech-era L2 writing: towards a new kind of process. ELT Journal 2010;64:175–83. doi:10.1093/elt/ccp038
256
Stevenson M, Schooner R, de Glopper K. Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL. Journal of Second Language Writing 2006;15:201–33. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002
257
Tan KE, Miller J. Writing in English in Malaysian High Schools: The Discourse of Examinations. Language and Education 2007;21:124–40. doi:10.2167/le663.0
258
Eng Tan K, Miller J. Writing in English in Malaysian High Schools: The Discourse of Examinations. Language and education 2007;21:124–40.
259
Wang W, Wen Q. L1 use in the L2 composing process: An exploratory study of 16 Chinese EFL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing 2002;11:225–46. doi:10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00084-X
260
Weber J-J. A concordance- and genre-informed approach to ESP essay writing. ELT Journal 2001;55:14–20. doi:10.1093/elt/55.1.14
261
Wong Fillmore L, E. Snow C. What Teachers Need to Know About Language. http://people.ucsc.edu/~ktellez/wong-fill-snow.html
262
Weber J-J. A concordance- and genre-informed approach to ESP essay writing. ELT journal 2001;55:14–20.
263
Yi Y. Engaging literacy: A biliterate student’s composing practices beyond school. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007;16:23–39. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.03.001
264
Besio C, Pronzini A. Inside Organizations and Out. Methodological Tenets for Empirical Research Inspired by Systems Theory. Urban education 2011;46:18–41.http://0-online.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/0042-0859
265
Brown S. Managing change in universities: a Sisyphean task? Quality in Higher Education 2012;18:139–46. doi:10.1080/13538322.2012.663547
266
Burns A. ESL Curriculum Development in Australia: Recent Trends and Debates. RELC Journal 2003;34:261–83. doi:10.1177/003368820303400302
267
Burns A. ESL Curriculum Development in Australia: Recent Trends and Debates. RELC journal 2003;34:261–83.
268
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
269
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
270
Carless D. Innovation in language teaching and learning. In: The encyclopedia of applied linguistics. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: : Wiley-Blackwell 2013. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9781405198431
271
Clarke, Mark A. A place to stand: essays for educators in troubled times. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2003.
272
Clarke, Mark A. Common ground, contested territory: examining roles of English language teachers in troubled times. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2007.
273
Cooksey RW. Yours, Mine or Ours: What Counts as Innovation? The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension 2011;17:283–95. doi:10.1080/1389224X.2011.559083
274
Dechant K, Dechant L. Using systems theory to conceptualize the implementation of undergraduate online education in a university setting. Organization Management Journal 2010;7:291–300. doi:10.1057/omj.2010.38
275
Ellsworth JB, Syracuse University, Educational Research Information Center (U.S.). Surviving change: a survey of educational change models. Syracuse, N.Y.: : Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University 2000.
276
Xu Fang and Mark Warschauer. Technology and Curricular Reform in China: A Case Study. TESOL Quarterly 2004;38:301–23.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3588382
277
Fang X, Warschauer M. Technology and Curricular Reform in China: A Case Study. TESOL quarterly 2004;38:301–23.
278
Fullan, Michael. The new meaning of educational change. 4th ed. New York: : Teachers College Press 2007.
279
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
280
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
281
Lockyer Willis, Jane, Willis, Dave. Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: : Heinemann 1996.
282
Lin B. English in Singapore: an Insider’s Perspective of Syllabus Renewal Through a Genre-Based Approach. RELC Journal 2003;34:223–46. doi:10.1177/003368820303400206
283
Lin B. English in Singapore: an Insider’s Perspective of Syllabus Renewal Through a Genre-Based Approach. RELC journal 2003;34:223–46.
284
Markee, Numa. Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1997.
285
Hall, David R., Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge in association with Macquarie University and The Open University 2001. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=536280&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
286
Hall, David, Hewings, Ann. Innovation in English language teaching: a reader. London: : Routledge 2001.
287
Murray, Denise E. Planning change, changing plans: innovations in second language teaching. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2008.
288
Lockyer Willis, Jane, Willis, Dave. Challenge and change in language teaching. Oxford: : Heinemann 1996.
289
Edge, Julian. Action research. Alexandria, Va: : Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages 2001.
290
Rogers, Everett M. Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: : Free Press 2003.
291
Tribble C, British Council. Managing change in English language teaching: lessons from experience. London: : British Council 2012.
292
Long, Michael H., Doughty, Catherine. The handbook of language teaching. Chichester, U.K.: : Wiley-Blackwell 2009.
293
Waters A, Vilches MaLC. Factors Affecting ELT Reforms: The Case of the Philippines Basic Education Curriculum. RELC Journal 2008;39:5–24. doi:10.1177/0033688208091138
294
Waters A. Managing innovation in English language education. Language Teaching 2009;42. doi:10.1017/S026144480999005X
295
Wedell, Martin. Planning for educational change: putting people and their contexts first. London: : Continuum 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781441192707
296
Wedell, Martin. Planning for educational change: putting people and their contexts first. London: : Continuum 2009.
297
Basturkmen H. Refining procedures: A needs analysis project at Kuwait University. English Teaching Forum 1998;36.
298
Basturkmen, Helen. Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2006. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781410617040
299
Basturkmen, Helen. Ideas and options in English for specific purposes. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers 2006.
300
Basturkmen, Helen. Developing courses in English for specific purposes. Houndmills, England: : Palgrave Macmillan 2010.
301
Belcher DD. Trends in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 2004;24. doi:10.1017/S026719050400008X
302
Belcher DD. Trends in Teaching English for Specific Purposes. Annual review of applied linguistics 2004;24:165–86.
303
Belcher, Diane Dewhurst. English for specific purposes in theory and practice. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2009.
304
Belcher, Diane Dewhurst, Johns, Ann M., Paltridge, Brian. New directions in English for specific purposes research. Ann Arbor, MI: : University of Michigan Press 2011.
305
Benesch, Sarah. Critical English for academic purposes: theory, politics, and practice. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2001.
306
Bhatia, V. K. Analysing genre: language use in professional settings. London: : Longman 1993.
307
Douglas, Dan. Assessing language for specific purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2000.
308
Nunan, David, Carter, Ronald. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
309
Dudley-Evans, Tony, St. John, Maggie-Jo. Developments in ESP: a multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1998.
310
Flowerdew, John. Academic listening: research perspectives. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1994.
311
Flowerdew, John, Peacock, Matthew. Research perspectives on English for academic purposes. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2001.
312
Harding, Keith. English for specific purposes. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2007.
313
Hewings, Martin, Nickerson, Catherine, British Council. Business English: research into practice. Harlow: : Longman (in association with the British Council) 1999.
314
Hutchinson, Tom, Waters, Alan. English for specific purposes: a learning-centred approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1987.
315
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Michigan classics ed. Ann Arbor: : University of Michigan Press 2004. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=478779&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
316
Hyland, Ken. Disciplinary discourses: social interactions in academic writing. Harlow: : Longman 2000.
317
Master, Peter Antony, Brinton, Donna. New ways in English for specific purposes. Alexandria, VA: : Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc 1998.
318
Peter Antony Master. Responses to ESP: English for Specific Purposes. San José State University, 1998 http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=a6DQGwAACAAJ&dq=Responses to ESP&hl=en&sa=X&ei=44OhU6nGJeew7AaizIC4CA&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAA
319
Hinkel, Eli. Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Mahwah, N.J.: : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2005.
320
Swales, John. Episodes in ESP: a source and reference book on the development of English for science and technology. Oxford: : Pergamon
321
Swales, John M. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 1990.
