1.
Lantz G. Applied Ethics: What Kind of Ethics and What Kind of Ethicist? Journal of applied philosophy. 2000;17(1):21-28. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1468-5930.00137/abstract
2.
Norman R. Applied Ethics: What is Applied to What? Utilitas. 2000;12(2):119-136. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=3366280&fileId=S0953820800002740
3.
LaFollette H, ed. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781118790731
4.
Wiley InterScience (Online service). A Companion to Applied Ethics. (Frey RG, Wellman CH, eds.). Blackwell; 2005. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470996621
5.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/
6.
Copp D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Vol Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford University Press; 2007. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001
7.
Copp D, ed. The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory. Vol Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford University Press; 2007. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001
8.
Thomson JJ. A Defense of Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1971;1(1):47-66. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265091
9.
Marquis D. Why Abortion is Immoral. The Journal of Philosophy. 1989;86(4):183-202. doi:10.2307/2026961
10.
Cudd AE. Sensationalized Philosophy: A Reply to Marquis’s ‘Why Abortion is Immoral’. The Journal of Philosophy. 1990;87(5):262-264. doi:10.2307/2026833
11.
Tooley M. Abortion and Infanticide. Philosophy & public affairs (Online)  Philosophy & public affairs [electronic resource] Philos public aff (Online)  Philosophy and public affairs (Online) Philosophy and public affairs. 1972;2(1):37-65. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/pdf/2264919.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
12.
Cohen AI, Wellman CH. Contemporary Debates in Applied Ethics. Vol Contemporary debates in philosophy. Blackwell Pub; 2005.
13.
Davis N. Abortion and Self-Defense. Philosophy & public affairs (Online)  Philosophy & public affairs [electronic resource] Philos public aff (Online)  Philosophy and public affairs (Online) Philosophy and public affairs. 1984;13(3):175-207. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/pdf/2265411.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
14.
Boonin-Vail D. A Defense of ‘A Defense of Abortion’: On the Responsibility Objection to Thomson’s Argument. Ethics. 1997;107(2):286-313. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2381949
15.
McDaniel I. The Responsibility Objection to Abortion: Rejecting the Notion that the Responsibility Objection Successfully Refutes a Woman’s Right to Choose. Bioethics. 2015;29(4):291-299. doi:10.1111/bioe.12097
16.
Gibson RF. On an Inconsistency in Thomson’s Abortion Argument. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 1984;46(1):131-139. doi:10.1007/BF00353495
17.
Finnis J. The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion: A Reply to Judith Thomson. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1973;2(2):117-145. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265137
18.
Brody B. Thomson on Abortion. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1972;1(3):335-340. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265056
19.
Sparrow R. ‘A Not-So-New Eugenics’. Hastings Center report (Online)  The Hastings Center report [electronic resource] Hastings cent rep (Online)  The Hastings Center report (Online). 2011;41(1):32-44. http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/hastings_center_report/v041/41.1.sparrow.pdf
20.
Public Affairs Quarterly. http://www.press.uillinois.edu/journals/paq.html
21.
Kuhse H, Singer P. Bioethics: An Anthology. Vol Blackwell philosophy anthologies. 2nd ed. Blackwell Pub; 2006.
22.
Buchanan AE. From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice. Cambridge University Press; 2000.
23.
Bostrom N, Ord T. The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics. Ethics (Chicago, Ill : Online)  Ethics [electronic resource] Ethics (Online)  Ethics (Online). 2006;116(4):656-679. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/full/10.1086/505233
24.
Savulescu J, Bostrom N. Human Enhancement. Oxford University Press; 2011.
25.
Savulescu J, Meulen RHJ ter, Kahane G. Enhancing Human Capacities. Wiley-Blackwell; 2011.
26.
Life Sciences, Society and Policy | Full text | Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics. doi:10.1186/1746-5354-3-3-43
27.
Singer P. Animal Liberation: Towards an End to Man’s Inhumanity to Animals. Paladin; 1977.
28.
LaFollette H. Ethics in Practice: An Anthology. Vol Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Fourth edition. Wiley Blackwell; 2014. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781118790731
29.
Davis SL. The Least Harm Principle May Require that Humans Consume a Diet Containing Large Herbivores, Not a Vegan Diet. Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics. 2003;16(4):387-394. doi:10.1023/A:1025638030686
30.
McPherson T. A Case for Ethical Veganism Intuitive and Methodological Considerations. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2014;11(6):677-703.
31.
Korsgaard K. A Kantian Case for Animal Rights. http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/CMK.Animal.Rights.pdf
32.
Singer P. Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1980;9(4):325-337. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265002
33.
Regan T. The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 1975;5(2):181-214. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40230566
34.
Fairlie S. Meat: A Benign Extravagance. 1st ed. Permanent Pub; 2010.
35.
Savoury A. How to green the world’s deserts and reverse climate change. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI
36.
Sinnott-Armstrong W, Howarth RB. Perspectives on Climate Change: Science, Economics, Politics, Ethics. Vol Advances in the economics of environmental resources. Elsevier JAI; 2005.
37.
KAGAN S. Do I Make a Difference? Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2011;39(2):105-141. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01203.x
38.
NEFSKY J. Consequentialism and the Problem of Collective Harm: A Reply to Kagan. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2011;39(4):364-395. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2012.01209.x
39.
Andreou C. Environmental Damage and the Puzzle of the Self-Torturer. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2006;34(1):95-108. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00054.x
40.
Lawson, B. Individual Complicity in Collective Wrongdoing. In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. Published online 2013. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-84875648932&site=eds-live&group=trial
41.
Parfit D. Reasons and Persons. Clarendon; 1984. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/019824908X.001.0001
42.
Jamieson, Dale. When Utilitarians Should Be Virtue Theorists. Utilitas; Jun2007, Vol. 2007;19:160-183. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=25532637&site=eds-live&group=trial
43.
Wündisch J. Green Votes not Green Virtues: Effective Utilitarian Responses to Climate Change. Utilitas. 2014;26(2):192-205. doi:10.1017/S0953820813000307
44.
Spiekermann K. Small impacts and imperceptible effects: Causing harm with others. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/eds/C__Sspiekermann%20impacts%20harms__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
45.
Glover J, Scott-Taggart MJ. It Makes no Difference Whether or Not I Do It. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes. 1975;49:171-209. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4106873
46.
Broad CD. On the Function of False Hypotheses in Ethics. International Journal of Ethics. 1916;26(3):377-397. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2377052
47.
Pinkert F. What if i cannot make a difference (and know it). Ethics. 2015;125(4):971-998. doi:10.1086/680909
48.
Zwolinski, Matt. SWEATSHOPS, CHOICE, AND EXPLOITATION. Business Ethics Quarterly. 2007;17(4):689-727. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=27019122&site=eds-live&group=trial
49.
Peter Singer. Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1972;1(3):229-243. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265052
50.
Pogge T. Real World Justice. The Journal of Ethics. 2005;9(1):29-53. doi:10.1007/s10892-004-3313-z
51.
Green K. Distance, Divided Responsibility and Universalizability. The Monist. 2003;86(3):501-515. doi:10.5840/monist200386330
52.
MacAskill W. Replaceability, Career Choice, and Making a Difference. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2014;17(2):269-283. doi:10.1007/s10677-013-9433-4
53.
Collins S. Duties to Make Friends. Ethical Theory & Moral Practice. 2013;16(5):907-921. doi:10.1007/s10677-013-9422-7
54.
Deveaux M. The Global Poor as Agents of Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 2015;12(2):125-150.
55.
PABLO GILABERT. THE DUTY TO ERADICATE GLOBAL POVERTY: POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE? Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2005;7(5):537-550. http://www.jstor.org/stable/25733600?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=global&searchText=poor&searchText=agents&searchText=of&searchText=justice&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dglobal%2Bpoor%2Bagents%2Bof%2Bjustice%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
56.
Brock G. Global Poverty and Desert. Politics. 2006;26(3):168-175. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00265.x
57.
Risse M. Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification? Ethics & International Affairs. 2005;19(1):9-18. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00485.x
58.
Wenar L. Property Rights and the Resource Curse. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2008;36(1):2-32. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00122.x
59.
Miller RW. Beneficence, Duty and Distance. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2004;32(4):357-383. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00018.x
60.
Satz D. What Do We Owe the Global Poor? Ethics & International Affairs. 2005;19(1):47-54. doi:10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00489.x
61.
O’Neill O. Global Poverty and the Limits of Academic Expertise. Ethics & International Affairs. 2012;26(2):183-189. doi:10.1017/S0892679412000287
62.
Spoerl JS. Peter Singer on famine, affluence, and morality: a Christian response. American Journal of Jurisprudence. 1992;37:113-134. http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajj37&start_page=113&collection=journals&id=117
63.
McElwee B. Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2011;14(4):457-466. doi:10.1007/s10677-010-9256-5
64.
Pogge T. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. 2nd ed. Polity; 2008.
65.
Liam B. Murphy. The Demands of Beneficence. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 1993;22(4):267-292. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265468
66.
Murphy LB. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory. Vol Oxford ethics series. Oxford University Press; 2000.
67.
Pogge T. Priorities of global justice. Metaphilosophy. 2001;32(1/2):6-24. doi:10.1111/1467-9973.00172
68.
Unger PK. Living High and Letting Die: Our Illusion of Innocence. Oxford University Press; 1996. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0195108590.001.0001
69.
Thomson, Judith Jarvis. The Right to Privacy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7/1/1975, Vol. 1975;4. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2265075&site=eds-live&group=trial
70.
Rachels, James. Why Privacy is Important. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7/1/1975, Vol. 1975;4. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2265077&site=eds-live&group=trial
71.
Benn SI. A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press; 1988. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609114
72.
Allen AL. Unpopular Privacy: What Must We Hide? Vol Studies in feminist philosophy. Oxford University Press; 2011. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195141375.001.0001
73.
Scanlon, Thomas. Thomson on Privacy. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7/1/1975, Vol. 1975;4. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2265076&site=eds-live&group=trial
74.
Benn SI. A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press; 1988. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609114
75.
Hughes RLD. Two concepts of privacy. Computer Law & Security Review. 2015;31(4):527-537. doi:10.1016/j.clsr.2015.05.010
76.
Blaauw, M. THE EPISTEMIC ACCOUNT OF PRIVACY. EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY; JUN, 2013, 10 2, p167-p177,  11p. Published online 2013. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000330372800006&site=eds-live&group=trial
77.
van den Hoven, M. J. Privacy and the varieties of moral wrong-doing in an information age. Computers & Society; Sep1997, Vol. 1997;27:33-37. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=73562782&site=eds-live&group=trial
78.
Mill JS, Gray J. On Liberty, and Other Essays. Vol Oxford world’s classics. Oxford University Press; 1998.
79.
Parent WA. Privacy, Morality, and the Law. Philosophy & public affairs (Online)  Philosophy & public affairs [electronic resource] Philos public aff (Online)  Philosophy and public affairs (Online) Philosophy and public affairs. 1983;12(4):269-288. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/pdf/2265374.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
80.
Gerstein RS. Intimacy and Privacy. Ethics (Chicago, Ill : Online)  Ethics [electronic resource] Ethics (Online)  Ethics (Online). 1978;89(1):76-81. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2380133?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
81.
Etzioni A. The Limits of Privacy. Basic Books; 1999.
82.
van den Hoven van Genderen, Rob. Trading Privacy for Security [article]. Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 2009;1(2009). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edshol&AN=hein.journals.amslawf1.50&site=eds-live&group=trial
83.
Lusk, Rachel E. Facebook’s Newest Friend - Employers: Use of Social Networking in Hiring Challenges U.S. Privacy Constructs [comments]. Capital University Law Review, Vol. 2014;42(2014). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edshol&AN=hein.journals.capulr42.26&site=eds-live&group=trial
84.
Wiley InterScience (Online service). A Companion to Applied Ethics. (Frey RG, Wellman CH, eds.). Blackwell; 2005. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470996621
85.
Lenman J. On Becoming Redundant or What Computers Shouldn’t Do. Journal of Applied Philosophy. 2001;18(1):1-11. doi:10.1111/1468-5930.00169
86.
Mitcham C. Convivial software: an end-user perspective on free and open source software. Ethics and Information Technology. 2009;11(4):299-310. doi:10.1007/s10676-009-9209-7
87.
Bonnefon JF, Shariff A, Rahwan I. Autonomous Vehicles Need Experimental Ethics: Are We Ready for Utilitarian Cars? Science. 352(6293):1573-1576. doi:10.1126/science.aaf2654
88.
Nozick R. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group; 2013. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3035644
89.
Parks JA. Lifting the Burden of Women’s Care Work: Should Robots Replace the ‘Human Touch’? Hypatia. 2010;25(1):100-120. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01086.x
90.
Collins M. Will Robots Replace Humans? Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation. 2014;75(10):46-46. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=99291974&site=eds-live&group=trial
91.
Wolbring, GYumakulov, S. Social Robots: Views of Staff of a Disability Service Organization. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS; AUG, 2014, 6 3, p457-p468,  12p. Published online 2014. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000340496200012&site=eds-live&group=trial
92.
Information Technology Wants to Be Free. Academe, v98 n5 p18-23 Sep-Oct 2012. Published online 2012:18-23. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ983934&site=eds-live&group=trial
93.
Nihlén Fahlquist J. Saving lives in road traffic—ethical aspects. Journal of Public Health. 2009;17(6):385-394. doi:10.1007/s10389-009-0264-7
94.
Hevelke A, Nida-Rümelin J. Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics. 2015;21(3):619-630. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5
95.
Purves D, Jenkins R, Strawser BJ. Autonomous Machines, Moral Judgment, and Acting for the Right Reasons. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 2015;18(4):851-872. doi:10.1007/s10677-015-9563-y
96.
Ravid O. Don’t Sue Me, I Was Just Lawfully Texting & Drunk When My Autonomous Car Crashed into You. Southwestern Law Review. 2014;44:175-207. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/swulr44&id=&page=&collection=journals&id=181
97.
Waytz A, Heafner J, Epley N. The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 2014;52:113-117. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005
98.
Gurney JK. Sue My Car Not Me: Products Liability and Accidents Involving Autonomous Vehicles. Journal of Law, Technology & Policy. Published online 2013:247-277. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jltp2013&id=&page=&collection=journals&id=259
99.
Swift A. The morality of school choice. Theory and Research in Education. 2004;2(1):7-21. doi:10.1177/1477878504040574
100.
Swift A. The morality of school choice reconsidered: a response. Theory & Research in Education. 2004;2(3):323-342. doi:10.1177/1477878504046528
101.
Anderson E. Rethinking Equality of Opportunity: Comment on Adam Swift’s ‘How Not to Be a Hypocrite’. Theory and Research in Education,. 2004;2(2):99-110. doi:10.1177/1477878504043438
102.
Macleod CM. The Puzzle of Parental Partiality: Reflections on ‘How Not to Be a Hypocrite--School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent’. Theory and Research in Education. 2004;2(3):309-321. doi:10.1177/1477878504046526
103.
Swift A. A short guide to hypocrisy. New Statesman. 2003;132(4662):16-16. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11265583&site=eds-live&group=trial
104.
Clayton M, Stevens D. School Choice and the Burdens of Justice. Theory and Research in Education. 2004;2(2):111-126. doi:10.1177/1477878504043439
105.
Macleod CM. The Puzzle of Parental Partiality: Reflections on How Not to Be a Hypocrite: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent. Theory and Research in Education. 2004;2(3):309-321. doi:10.1177/1477878504046526
106.
Swift A. How Not to Be a Hypocrite: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent. Routledge; 2003. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=2253&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
107.
Power S. Comments on ‘How Not to Be a Hypocrite’: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed. Theory and Research in Education. 2004;2(1):23-29. doi:10.1177/1477878504040575
108.
Anderson K. How not to be a Hypocrite: School Choice and the Morally Perplexed Parent. Journal of Educational Thought. 2006;40(1):97-100. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/213814123?accountid=14888
109.
Leathwood C. A Critique of Institutional Inequalities in Higher Education (or an Alternative to Hypocrisy for Higher Educational Policy). Theory and Research in Education. 2004;2(1):31-48. doi:10.1177/1477878504040576
110.
Brighouse H, Swift A. Legitimate Parental Partiality. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 2009;37(1):43-80. doi:10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.01145.x
111.
Leibowitz, Uri D. Moral Deliberation and Ad Hominem Fallacies. Journal of Moral Philosophy; 2015, p1-23, 23p. Published online 2015:1-23. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=110433362&site=eds-live&group=trial
112.
Singer, Peter. Moral Experts. Analysis, 3/1/1972, Vol. 1972;32. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.3327906&site=eds-live&group=trial
113.
Cross B. Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement. Bioethics. 2016;30(3):188-194. doi:10.1111/bioe.12173
114.
Gesang, B. ARE MORAL PHILOSOPHERS MORAL EXPERTS? BIOETHICS; MAY, 2010, 24 4, p153-p159,  7p. Published online 2010. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000276014000001&site=eds-live&group=trial
115.
Archard, D. WHY MORAL PHILOSOPHERS ARE NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE MORAL EXPERTS. BIOETHICS; MAR, 2011, 25 3, p119-p127,  9p. Published online 2011. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000286890800001&site=eds-live&group=trial
116.
Hoffmann, M. How to identify moral experts? An application of Goldman’s criteria for expert identification to the domain of morality. In: Analyse und Kritik. 2012;(2). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-84878508925&site=eds-live&group=trial
117.
Burch, Robert W. ARE THERE MORAL EXPERTS? The Monist, 10/1/1974, Vol. 1974;58. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.27902392&site=eds-live&group=trial
118.
Miller, Peter. Who are the Moral Experts? Journal of Moral Education; Oct1975, Vol. 1975;5:3-12. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=75433329&site=eds-live&group=trial
119.
Nielsen, K. On the need for ‘moral experts’: a test case for practical ethics. In: The International journal of applied philosophy. 1984;(1). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-0021387549&site=eds-live&group=trial
120.
Hills A. Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology*. Ethics. 2009;120(1):94-127. doi:10.1086/648610
121.
Driver, Julia. Autonomy and the Asymmetry Problem for Moral Expertise. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 4/1/2006, Vol. 2006;128. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4321738&site=eds-live&group=trial
122.
Goldman, Alvin I. Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7/1/2001, Vol. 2001;63. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.3071090&site=eds-live&group=trial