[1]
G. Lantz, ‘Applied Ethics: What Kind of Ethics and What Kind of Ethicist?’, Journal of applied philosophy, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1468-5930.00137/abstract
[2]
R. Norman, ‘Applied Ethics: What is Applied to What?’, Utilitas, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 119–136, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=3366280&fileId=S0953820800002740
[3]
H. LaFollette, Ed., Ethics in practice: an anthology, Fourth edition., vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781118790731
[4]
Wiley InterScience (Online service), A companion to applied ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470996621
[5]
‘Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/
[6]
D. Copp, Ed., The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001
[7]
D. Copp, Ed., The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001
[8]
J. J. Thomson, ‘A Defense of Abortion’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 47–66, 1971 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265091
[9]
D. Marquis, ‘Why Abortion is Immoral’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 183–202, 1989, doi: 10.2307/2026961. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2026961
[10]
A. E. Cudd, ‘Sensationalized Philosophy: A Reply to Marquis’s “Why Abortion is Immoral”’, The Journal of Philosophy, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 262–264, 1990, doi: 10.2307/2026833. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2026833
[11]
M. Tooley, ‘Abortion and Infanticide’, Philosophy & public affairs (Online)  Philosophy & public affairs [electronic resource]. Philos. public aff. (Online)  Philosophy and public affairs (Online) Philosophy and public affairs, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 37–65, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/pdf/2264919.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
[12]
A. I. Cohen and C. H. Wellman, Contemporary debates in applied ethics, vol. Contemporary debates in philosophy. Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub, 2005.
[13]
N. Davis, ‘Abortion and Self-Defense’, Philosophy & public affairs (Online)  Philosophy & public affairs [electronic resource]. Philos. public aff. (Online)  Philosophy and public affairs (Online) Philosophy and public affairs, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 175–207, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/pdf/2265411.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
[14]
D. Boonin-Vail, ‘A Defense of “A Defense of Abortion”: On the Responsibility Objection to Thomson’s Argument’, Ethics, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 286–313, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2381949
[15]
I. McDaniel, ‘The Responsibility Objection to Abortion: Rejecting the Notion that the Responsibility Objection Successfully Refutes a Woman’s Right to Choose’, Bioethics, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 291–299, 2015, doi: 10.1111/bioe.12097. [Online]. Available: http://0-ejournals.ebsco.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/Article.asp?ContributionID=35474987
[16]
R. F. Gibson, ‘On an Inconsistency in Thomson’s Abortion Argument’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 131–139, 1984, doi: 10.1007/BF00353495. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4319694
[17]
J. Finnis, ‘The Rights and Wrongs of Abortion: A Reply to Judith Thomson’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 117–145, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265137
[18]
B. Brody, ‘Thomson on Abortion’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 335–340, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265056
[19]
R. Sparrow, ‘“A Not-So-New Eugenics”’, Hastings Center report (Online)  The Hastings Center report [electronic resource]. Hastings cent. rep. (Online)  The Hastings Center report (Online), vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 32–44, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/hastings_center_report/v041/41.1.sparrow.pdf
[20]
‘Public Affairs Quarterly’ [Online]. Available: http://www.press.uillinois.edu/journals/paq.html
[21]
H. Kuhse and P. Singer, Bioethics: an anthology, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[22]
A. E. Buchanan, From chance to choice: genetics and justice. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[23]
N. Bostrom and T. Ord, ‘The Reversal Test: Eliminating Status Quo Bias in Applied Ethics’, Ethics (Chicago, Ill. : Online)  Ethics [electronic resource]. Ethics (Online)  Ethics (Online), vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 656–679, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/full/10.1086/505233
[24]
J. Savulescu and N. Bostrom, Human enhancement. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2011.
[25]
J. Savulescu, R. H. J. ter Meulen, and G. Kahane, Enhancing human capacities. Chichester, West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
[26]
‘Life Sciences, Society and Policy | Full text | Procreative Beneficence, Obligation, and Eugenics’, doi: 10.1186/1746-5354-3-3-43. [Online]. Available: http://www.lsspjournal.com/content/3/3/43
[27]
P. Singer, Animal liberation: towards an end to man’s inhumanity to animals. London: Paladin, 1977.
[28]
H. LaFollette, Ethics in practice: an anthology, Fourth edition., vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley Blackwell, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781118790731
[29]
S. L. Davis, ‘The Least Harm Principle May Require that Humans Consume a Diet Containing Large Herbivores, Not a Vegan Diet.’, Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Ethics, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 387–394, 2003, doi: 10.1023/A:1025638030686. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1023/A:1025638030686
[30]
T. McPherson, ‘A Case for Ethical Veganism Intuitive and Methodological Considerations’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 677–703, 2014.
[31]
K. Korsgaard, ‘A Kantian Case for Animal Rights’ [Online]. Available: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~korsgaar/CMK.Animal.Rights.pdf
[32]
P. Singer, ‘Utilitarianism and Vegetarianism’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 325–337, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265002
[33]
T. Regan, ‘The Moral Basis of Vegetarianism’, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 181–214, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40230566
[34]
S. Fairlie, Meat: a benign extravagance, 1st ed. East Meon: Permanent Pub, 2010.
[35]
A. Savoury, ‘How to green the world’s deserts and reverse climate change’. [Online]. Available: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpTHi7O66pI
[36]
W. Sinnott-Armstrong and R. B. Howarth, Perspectives on climate change: science, economics, politics, ethics, vol. Advances in the economics of environmental resources. Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI, 2005.
[37]
S. KAGAN, ‘Do I Make a Difference?’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 105–141, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2011.01203.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=62837380&site=eds-live&group=trial
[38]
J. NEFSKY, ‘Consequentialism and the Problem of Collective Harm: A Reply to Kagan.’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 364–395, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2012.01209.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=74132867&site=eds-live&group=trial
[39]
C. Andreou, ‘Environmental Damage and the Puzzle of the Self-Torturer’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 95–108, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2006.00054.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3557976
[40]
Lawson, B., ‘Individual Complicity in Collective Wrongdoing’, In: Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-84875648932&site=eds-live&group=trial
[41]
D. Parfit, Reasons and persons. Oxford: Clarendon, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/019824908X.001.0001
[42]
Jamieson, Dale, ‘When Utilitarians Should Be Virtue Theorists.’, Utilitas; Jun2007, Vol, vol. 19, pp. 160–183, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=25532637&site=eds-live&group=trial
[43]
J. Wündisch, ‘Green Votes not Green Virtues: Effective Utilitarian Responses to Climate Change’, Utilitas, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 192–205, 2014, doi: 10.1017/S0953820813000307. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1530317563?accountid=14888
[44]
K. Spiekermann, ‘Small impacts and imperceptible effects: Causing harm with others’ [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/eds/C__Sspiekermann%20impacts%20harms__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
[45]
J. Glover and M. J. Scott-Taggart, ‘It Makes no Difference Whether or Not I Do It’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 49, pp. 171–209, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4106873
[46]
C. D. Broad, ‘On the Function of False Hypotheses in Ethics’, International Journal of Ethics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 377–397, 1916 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2377052
[47]
F. Pinkert, ‘What if i cannot make a difference (and know it)’, Ethics, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 971–998, 2015, doi: 10.1086/680909. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1086/680909
[48]
Zwolinski, Matt, ‘SWEATSHOPS, CHOICE, AND EXPLOITATION.’, Business Ethics Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 689–727, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=27019122&site=eds-live&group=trial
[49]
Peter Singer, ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 229–243, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265052
[50]
T. Pogge, ‘Real World Justice’, The Journal of Ethics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 29–53, 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10892-004-3313-z. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25115814
[51]
K. Green, ‘Distance, Divided Responsibility and Universalizability’, The Monist, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 501–515, 2003, doi: 10.5840/monist200386330. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27903838
[52]
W. MacAskill, ‘Replaceability, Career Choice, and Making a Difference’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 269–283, 2014, doi: 10.1007/s10677-013-9433-4. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/s10677-013-9433-4
[53]
S. Collins, ‘Duties to Make Friends.’, Ethical Theory & Moral Practice, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 907–921, 2013, doi: 10.1007/s10677-013-9422-7. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/24478736
[54]
M. Deveaux, ‘The Global Poor as Agents of Justice.’, Journal of Moral Philosophy, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 125–150, 2015.
[55]
PABLO GILABERT, ‘THE DUTY TO ERADICATE GLOBAL POVERTY: POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE?’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 537–550, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25733600?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=global&searchText=poor&searchText=agents&searchText=of&searchText=justice&searchUri=%2Faction%2FdoBasicSearch%3FQuery%3Dglobal%2Bpoor%2Bagents%2Bof%2Bjustice%26amp%3Bacc%3Don%26amp%3Bwc%3Don%26amp%3Bfc%3Doff%26amp%3Bgroup%3Dnone&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[56]
G. Brock, ‘Global Poverty and Desert.’, Politics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 168–175, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00265.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00265.x
[57]
M. Risse, ‘Do We Owe the Global Poor Assistance or Rectification?’, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 9–18, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00485.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/200508937?accountid=14888
[58]
L. Wenar, ‘Property Rights and the Resource Curse’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 2–32, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.00122.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40212810
[59]
R. W. Miller, ‘Beneficence, Duty and Distance’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 357–383, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2004.00018.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3557993
[60]
D. Satz, ‘What Do We Owe the Global Poor?’, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47–54, 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1747-7093.2005.tb00489.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/200503736?accountid=14888
[61]
O. O’Neill, ‘Global Poverty and the Limits of Academic Expertise.’, Ethics & International Affairs, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 183–189, 2012, doi: 10.1017/S0892679412000287. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1030091034?accountid=14888
[62]
J. S. Spoerl, ‘Peter Singer on famine, affluence, and morality: a Christian response.’, American Journal of Jurisprudence, vol. 37, pp. 113–134, 1992 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/ajj37&start_page=113&collection=journals&id=117
[63]
B. McElwee, ‘Impartial Reasons, Moral Demands’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 457–466, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10677-010-9256-5. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41472612
[64]
T. Pogge, World poverty and human rights: cosmopolitan responsibilities and reforms, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity, 2008.
[65]
Liam B. Murphy, ‘The Demands of Beneficence’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 267–292, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2265468
[66]
L. B. Murphy, Moral demands in nonideal theory, vol. Oxford ethics series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[67]
T. Pogge, ‘Priorities of global justice’, Metaphilosophy, vol. 32, no. 1/2, pp. 6–24, 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-9973.00172. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/24439448
[68]
P. K. Unger, Living high and letting die: our illusion of innocence. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0195108590.001.0001
[69]
Thomson, Judith Jarvis, ‘The Right to Privacy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7/1/1975, Vol, vol. 4, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2265075&site=eds-live&group=trial
[70]
Rachels, James, ‘Why Privacy is Important’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7/1/1975, Vol, vol. 4, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2265077&site=eds-live&group=trial
[71]
S. I. Benn, A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609114
[72]
A. L. Allen, Unpopular privacy: what must we hide?, vol. Studies in feminist philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195141375.001.0001
[73]
Scanlon, Thomas, ‘Thomson on Privacy’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 7/1/1975, Vol, vol. 4, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.2265076&site=eds-live&group=trial
[74]
S. I. Benn, A Theory of Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511609114
[75]
R. L. D. Hughes, ‘Two concepts of privacy’, Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 527–537, Aug. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2015.05.010.
[76]
Blaauw, M, ‘THE EPISTEMIC ACCOUNT OF PRIVACY’, EPISTEME-A JOURNAL OF INDIVIDUAL AND SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY; JUN, 2013, 10 2, p167-p177,  11p, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000330372800006&site=eds-live&group=trial
[77]
van den Hoven, M. J., ‘Privacy and the varieties of moral wrong-doing in an information age.’, Computers & Society; Sep1997, Vol, vol. 27, pp. 33–37, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=73562782&site=eds-live&group=trial
[78]
J. S. Mill and J. Gray, On liberty, and other essays, vol. Oxford world’s classics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
[79]
W. A. Parent, ‘Privacy, Morality, and the Law’, Philosophy & public affairs (Online)  Philosophy & public affairs [electronic resource]. Philos. public aff. (Online)  Philosophy and public affairs (Online) Philosophy and public affairs, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 269–288, 1983 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/pdf/2265374.pdf?acceptTC=true&jpdConfirm=true
[80]
R. S. Gerstein, ‘Intimacy and Privacy’, Ethics (Chicago, Ill. : Online)  Ethics [electronic resource]. Ethics (Online)  Ethics (Online), vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 76–81, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2380133?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[81]
A. Etzioni, The limits of privacy. New York, N.Y.: Basic Books, 1999.
[82]
van den Hoven van Genderen, Rob, ‘Trading Privacy for Security [article]’, Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol, vol. 1, no. 2009, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edshol&AN=hein.journals.amslawf1.50&site=eds-live&group=trial
[83]
Lusk, Rachel E., ‘Facebook’s Newest Friend - Employers: Use of Social Networking in Hiring Challenges U.S. Privacy Constructs [comments]’, Capital University Law Review, Vol, vol. 42, no. 2014, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edshol&AN=hein.journals.capulr42.26&site=eds-live&group=trial
[84]
Wiley InterScience (Online service), A companion to applied ethics. Oxford: Blackwell, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/book/10.1002/9780470996621
[85]
J. Lenman, ‘On Becoming Redundant or What Computers Shouldn’t Do’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2001, doi: 10.1111/1468-5930.00169. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/24354314
[86]
C. Mitcham, ‘Convivial software: an end-user perspective on free and open source software’, Ethics and Information Technology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 299–310, 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10676-009-9209-7. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/222261868?accountid=14888
[87]
J.-F. Bonnefon, A. Shariff, and I. Rahwan, ‘Autonomous Vehicles Need Experimental Ethics: Are We Ready for Utilitarian Cars?’, Science, vol. 352, no. 6293, pp. 1573–1576, doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2654. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1126/science.aaf2654
[88]
R. Nozick, Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books, a member of the Perseus Books Group, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3035644
[89]
J. A. Parks, ‘Lifting the Burden of Women’s Care Work: Should Robots Replace the “Human Touch”?’, Hypatia, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 100–120, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01086.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40602642
[90]
M. Collins, ‘Will Robots Replace Humans?’, Industrial Maintenance & Plant Operation, vol. 75, no. 10, pp. 46–46, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=99291974&site=eds-live&group=trial
[91]
Wolbring, GYumakulov, S, ‘Social Robots: Views of Staff of a Disability Service Organization’, INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS; AUG, 2014, 6 3, p457-p468,  12p, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswsc&AN=000340496200012&site=eds-live&group=trial
[92]
‘Information Technology Wants to Be Free’, Academe, v98 n5 p18-23 Sep-Oct 2012, pp. 18–23, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ983934&site=eds-live&group=trial
[93]
J. Nihlén Fahlquist, ‘Saving lives in road traffic—ethical aspects’, Journal of Public Health, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 385–394, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s10389-009-0264-7.
[94]
A. Hevelke and J. Nida-Rümelin, ‘Responsibility for Crashes of Autonomous Vehicles: An Ethical Analysis’, Science and Engineering Ethics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 619–630, Jun. 2015, doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9565-5.
[95]
D. Purves, R. Jenkins, and B. J. Strawser, ‘Autonomous Machines, Moral Judgment, and Acting for the Right Reasons’, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 851–872, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10677-015-9563-y. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/s10677-015-9563-y
[96]
O. Ravid, ‘Don’t Sue Me, I Was Just Lawfully Texting & Drunk When My Autonomous Car Crashed into You.’, Southwestern Law Review, vol. 44, pp. 175–207, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/swulr44&id=&page=&collection=journals&id=181
[97]
A. Waytz, J. Heafner, and N. Epley, ‘The mind in the machine: Anthropomorphism increases trust in an autonomous vehicle’, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 52, pp. 113–117, May 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2014.01.005.
[98]
J. K. Gurney, ‘Sue My Car Not Me: Products Liability and Accidents Involving Autonomous Vehicles.’, Journal of Law, Technology & Policy, pp. 247–277, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/jltp2013&id=&page=&collection=journals&id=259
[99]
A. Swift, ‘The morality of school choice’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–21, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504040574. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504040574
[100]
A. Swift, ‘The morality of school choice reconsidered: a response’, Theory & Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 323–342, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504046528. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504046528
[101]
E. Anderson, ‘Rethinking Equality of Opportunity: Comment on Adam Swift’s “How Not to Be a Hypocrite”’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 99–110, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504043438. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504043438
[102]
C. M. Macleod, ‘The Puzzle of Parental Partiality: Reflections on “How Not to Be a Hypocrite--School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent”’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 309–321, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504046526. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504046526
[103]
A. Swift, ‘A short guide to hypocrisy.’, New Statesman, vol. 132, no. 4662, pp. 16–16, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=11265583&site=eds-live&group=trial
[104]
M. Clayton and D. Stevens, ‘School Choice and the Burdens of Justice’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 111–126, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504043439. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504043439
[105]
C. M. Macleod, ‘The Puzzle of Parental Partiality: Reflections on How Not to Be a Hypocrite: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed Parent’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 309–321, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504046526. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504046526
[106]
A. Swift, How not to be a hypocrite: school choice for the morally perplexed parent. London: Routledge, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=2253&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[107]
S. Power, ‘Comments on “How Not to Be a Hypocrite”: School Choice for the Morally Perplexed’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 23–29, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504040575. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504040575
[108]
K. Anderson, ‘How not to be a Hypocrite: School Choice and the Morally Perplexed Parent.’, Journal of Educational Thought, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 97–100, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/213814123?accountid=14888
[109]
C. Leathwood, ‘A Critique of Institutional Inequalities in Higher Education (or an Alternative to Hypocrisy for Higher Educational Policy)’, Theory and Research in Education, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–48, 2004, doi: 10.1177/1477878504040576. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1477878504040576
[110]
H. Brighouse and A. Swift, ‘Legitimate Parental Partiality’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 43–80, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1088-4963.2008.01145.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40212836
[111]
Leibowitz, Uri D., ‘Moral Deliberation and Ad Hominem Fallacies.’, Journal of Moral Philosophy; 2015, p1-23, 23p, pp. 1–23, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=110433362&site=eds-live&group=trial
[112]
Singer, Peter, ‘Moral Experts’, Analysis, 3/1/1972, Vol, vol. 32, 1972 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.3327906&site=eds-live&group=trial
[113]
B. Cross, ‘Moral Philosophy, Moral Expertise, and the Argument from Disagreement’, Bioethics, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 188–194, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.1111/bioe.12173.
[114]
Gesang, B, ‘ARE MORAL PHILOSOPHERS MORAL EXPERTS?’, BIOETHICS; MAY, 2010, 24 4, p153-p159,  7p, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000276014000001&site=eds-live&group=trial
[115]
Archard, D, ‘WHY MORAL PHILOSOPHERS ARE NOT AND SHOULD NOT BE MORAL EXPERTS’, BIOETHICS; MAR, 2011, 25 3, p119-p127,  9p, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000286890800001&site=eds-live&group=trial
[116]
Hoffmann, M., ‘How to identify moral experts? An application of Goldman’s criteria for expert identification to the domain of morality’, In: Analyse und Kritik, no. 2, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-84878508925&site=eds-live&group=trial
[117]
Burch, Robert W., ‘ARE THERE MORAL EXPERTS?’, The Monist, 10/1/1974, Vol, vol. 58, 1974 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.27902392&site=eds-live&group=trial
[118]
Miller, Peter, ‘Who are the Moral Experts?’, Journal of Moral Education; Oct1975, Vol, vol. 5, pp. 3–12, 1975 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=75433329&site=eds-live&group=trial
[119]
Nielsen, K., ‘On the need for “moral experts”: a test case for practical ethics.’, In: The International journal of applied philosophy, no. 1, 1984 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edselc&AN=edselc.2-52.0-0021387549&site=eds-live&group=trial
[120]
A. Hills, ‘Moral Testimony and Moral Epistemology*’, Ethics, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 94–127, Oct. 2009, doi: 10.1086/648610.
[121]
Driver, Julia, ‘Autonomy and the Asymmetry Problem for Moral Expertise’, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 4/1/2006, Vol, vol. 128, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.4321738&site=eds-live&group=trial
[122]
Goldman, Alvin I., ‘Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 7/1/2001, Vol, vol. 63, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsjsr&AN=edsjsr.10.2307.3071090&site=eds-live&group=trial