A New Magna Carta. 2014, http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/463/463.pdf.
Allan, T. R. S. Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. electronic resource, Oxford University Press, 2005, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001.
Allan, T.R.S. ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”’. The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 65, no. 3, 2006, pp. 671–95, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007264.
---. ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’. Law Quarterly Review, no. 127(Jan), 2011, pp. 96–117, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I20DA9E6008C611E0A451F66F817AC0EE.
Allan, T. R. S. Law, Liberty, and Justice: The Legal Foundations of British Constitutionalism. Clarendon Press, 1994.
Allan, T.R.S. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty: Law, Politics, and Revolution’. Law Quarterly Review, no. 113(Jul), 1997, pp. 443–52, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F70AB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
Allan, T. R. S. ‘Questions of Legality and Legitimacy: Form and Substance in British Constitutionalism’. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 1, 2011, pp. 155–62, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor017.
---. The Sovereignty of Law: Freedom, Constitution and Common Law. Oxford University Press, 2013, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.001.0001.
Aroney, Nicholas. ‘Reserved Matters, Legislative Purpose and the Referendum on Scottish Independence’. Public Law, no. Jul, 2014, pp. 422–45, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A24C20F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A.
Ballinger, Chris. The House of Lords, 1911-2011: A Century of Non-Reform. Hart, 2012.
Bamforth, Nicholas, and Peter Leyland, editors. Accountability in the Contemporary Constitution. Oxford University Press, 2014, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.001.0001.
Barber, N.W. ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’. The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 60, no. 1, 2001, pp. 59–88, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197301000629.
Barber, N. W. ‘The Afterlife of Parliamentary Sovereignty’. International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 1, 2011, pp. 144–54, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor023.
Barendt, Eric. ‘Separation of Powers and Constitutional Government’. Public Law, no. Win, 1995, pp. 599–619, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID3936440E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Beaton, Ross. ‘The Boundaries of Proportionality Review and the End of Life’. Judicial Review, vol. 19, no. 3, 2014, pp. 135–39, https://doi.org/10.5235/10854681.19.3.135.
Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) v. Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/bellin-1.htm.
Bingham, T. H. The Rule of Law. Allen Lane, 2010.
Bjorge, Eirik. ‘Fundamental Rights at English (and European?) Common Law’. Law Quarterly Review, no. 131(Apr), 2015, pp. 192–96, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9010B212C81111E4A0E9E7C45C1190E1.
Blick, Andrew. Codifying – or Not Codifying – the UK Constitution: A Literature Review. Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies King’s College London, 2011, http://www.parliament.uk/pagefiles/56954/CPCS%20Literature%20Review%20(4).pdf.
Bogdanor, Vernon. The New British Constitution. Hart Pub, 2009.
Bogdanor, Vernon and British Academy. The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2003.
Bradley, A. W., et al. Constitutional and Administrative Law. Sixteenth edition, Pearson, 2014, http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2741966.
Brady, Alan D. P. Proportionality and Deference under the UK Human Rights Act: An Institutionally Sensitive Approach. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. http://www.bailii.org/.
Cambridge University Law Society, et al. The Cambridge Law Journal. electronic resource, 1921, http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/jid_Clj.
Campbell, David, and James Young. ‘The Metric Martyrs and the Entrenchment Jurisprudence of Lord Justice Laws’. Public Law, no. Aut, 2002, pp. 399–406, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F6E3A1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
Campbell, Tom, et al. Sceptical Essays on Human Rights. Oxford University Press, 2001, http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662633.
Clayton, Richard. ‘Judicial Deference and “Democratic Dialogue”: The Legitimacy of Judicial Intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’. Public Law, no. Spr, 2004, pp. 33–47, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84927EF0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
---. ‘The Empire Strikes Back: Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act’. Public Law, no. Jan, 2015, pp. 3–12, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I28D78E607B4611E4A15DE99780331015.
Coservatives on Bill of Rights. https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20Files/human_rights.pdf.
Craig, P. P. Administrative Law. 7th ed, Sweet & Maxwell, 2012.
Craig, Paul. ‘Constitutionalising Constitutional Law: HS2’. Public Law, no. Jul, 2014, pp. 373–92, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A13AB0F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A.
Craig, Paul. ‘The European Union Act 2011: Locks, Limits and Legality’. Common Market Law Review, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1915–44, http://0-www.kluwerlawonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011074.
Craig, Paul P. ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’. Public Law, 1997, pp. 467–87, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID15274F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. Prospect: Politics, Essay, Review. electronic resource, http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB.
---. The Spectator. electronic resource, 1994, http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB.
Draghici, Carmen. ‘The Blanket Ban on Assisted Suicide: Between Moral Paternalism and Utilitarian Justice’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 3, 2015, pp. 286–97, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I293F05E026F411E58A24809D3D7EB82F.
Edwards, Richard A. ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’. Modern Law Review, vol. 65, no. 6, 2002, pp. 859–82, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00413.
Elliott, Mark. ‘A Damp Squib in the Long Grass: The Report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review, vol. 2, 2013, pp. 137–51, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I4BCCF680A3E811E2A94CA75C16A20EA4.
---. ‘Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom’s Contemporary Constitution’. European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 10, no. 3, 2014, pp. 379–92, http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1648045830?accountid=14888.
---. ‘The Proposed Scotland Bill: The Constitutional Implications of Draft Clauses 1 and 2’. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557451.
Elliott, Mark, and Robert Thomas. Public Law. Third edition, Oxford University Press, 2017.
Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1765/J98.html.
European Communities Act 1972. Statute Law Database, http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68/contents.
Ewing, K. D. ‘The Futility of the Human Rights Act’. Public Law, no. Win, 2004, pp. 829–52, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A8ED21E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
Ewing, K. D., and Joo-Cheong Tham. ‘The Continuing Futility of the Human Rights Act’. Public Law, no. Win, 2008, pp. 668–93, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EAB8B099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26.
Finnis, John. ‘A British “Convention Right” to Assistance in Suicide?’ Law Quarterly Review, vol. 131, 2015, pp. 1–8, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I34BAA2907BAE11E49BBC911AA7DF78F5.
Flinders, Matthew. ‘The Enduring Centrality of Individual Ministerial Responsibility within the British Constitution’. The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, 2000, pp. 73–92, https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330008420632.
Foster, Steve. ‘Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998’. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, vol. 179, no. 46, 2015, http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5HK8-1J01-DYJF-G17K&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t.
Gearty, C. A. Liberty and Security. Polity, 2013.
Gearty, Conor. ‘On Fantasy Island: British Politics, English Judges and the European Convention on Human Rights’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 1, 2015, pp. 1–8, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD6D8CD0ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E.
Gee, G., and G. C. N. Webber. ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, 2010, pp. 273–99, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013.
Ghaidan (Appellant) v. Godin-Mendoza (FC) (Respondent) [2004] UKHL 30. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040621/gha-1.htm.
Goldsworthy, Jeffrey Denys. Parliamentary Sovereignty: Contemporary Debates. electronic resource, Cambridge University Press, 2010, http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277078&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
---. The Sovereignty of Parliament: History and Philosophy. electronic resource, Clarendon, 2001, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248087.001.0001.
Gordon, Michael. ‘The Conceptual Foundations of Parliamentary Sovereignty: Reconsidering Jennings and Wade’. Public Law, no. Jul, 2009, pp. 519–43, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3E10D5B1727E11DE8047B748D67C18CA.
Gordon, Michael, and Michael Dougan. ‘The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: “Who Won the Bloody War Anyway?”’ European Law Review, vol. 37, no. 1, 2012, pp. 3–30, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID13B043050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9.
Gyorfi, T. ‘Between Common Law Constitutionalism and Procedural Democracy’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, 2013, pp. 317–38, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt004.
Harlow, Carol, and Richard Rawlings. Law and Administration. 3rd ed, electronic resource, vol. Law in context, Cambridge University Press, 2009, http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=238868&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Heydon, J. D. ‘Are Bills of Rights Necessary in Common Law Systems?’ Law Quarterly Review, no. 130(Jul), 2014, pp. 392–412, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7CAEEF40F31C11E3847EA720781C7CD8.
Hickman, Tom, and P. P. Craig. Public Law after the Human Rights Act. Hart Pub, 2010, http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2544638.
Himsworth, C. M. G. ‘Devolution and Its Jurisdictional Asymmetries’. Modern Law Review, vol. 70, no. 1, 2007, pp. 31–58, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00625.x.
Horne, Alexander, and Gavin Drewry, editors. Parliament and the Law. Second edition, vol. volume 8, Hart Publishing, 2018.
House of Commons - The EU Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty - European Scrutiny Committee. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/633/63302.htm.
House of Commons - The EU Bill: Restrictions on Treaties and Decisions Relating to the EU - European Scrutiny Committee. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/682/68202.htm.
HS2 Alliance Case. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0172_Judgment.pdf.
Human Rights Act Reform | UK Constitutional Law Association. http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/tag/human-rights-act-reform/.
Jackson and Others (Appellants) v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [2005] UKHL 56. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051013/jack.pdf.
Johnson, Nevil. Reshaping the British Constitution: Essays in Political Interpretation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
Jones, T. H. ‘Wales, Devolution and Sovereignty’. Statute Law Review, vol. 33, no. 2, 2012, pp. 151–62, https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hms023.
Jones, Timothy H., and Jane M. Williams. ‘Wales as a Jurisdiction’. Public Law, no. Spr, 2004, pp. 78–101, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I847E33A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
Jowell, Jeffrey. ‘Judicial Deference: Servility, Civility or Institutional Capacity?’ Public Law, 2003, pp. 592–601, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8487F7A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
---. ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty under the New Constitutional Hypothesis’. Public Law, no. Aut, 2006, pp. 562–80, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF0D05E100D4A11DB9253D431BB978268.
Jowell, Jeffrey L., et al. The Changing Constitution. Eighth edition, Oxford University Press, 2015.
JSTOR (Organization) and William S. Hein & Company. The Modern Law Review. electronic resource, 1937, http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2230.
Kavanagh, A. ‘The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, 2006, pp. 179–206, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi049.
Kavanagh, Aileen. Constitutional Review under the UK Human Rights Act. electronic resource, Cambridge University Press, 2009, https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511724374.
---. ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’. Law Quarterly Review, no. 126(Apr), 2010, pp. 222–50, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069.
---. ‘Judging the Judges under the Human Rights Act: Deference, Disillusionment and the “War on Terror”’. Public Law, no. Apr, 2009, pp. 287–304, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFC2512E1231F11DEBA18CA797BE6038F.
King, Anthony. The British Constitution. electronic resource, Oxford University Press, 2009, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001.
Klug, Francesca. ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act 1998’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 2, 2003, pp. 125–33, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A25D70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
Klug, Francesca, and Amy Williams. ‘The Choice before Us? The Report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights’. Public Law, no. Jul, 2013, pp. 459–68, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EDF7D0D7C911E29A79B66BE8E69D4B.
Laws, John. ‘Law and Democracy’. Public Law, no. Spr, 1995, pp. 72–93, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID390A520E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Lee, R. G. Blackstone’s Statutes on Public Law and Human Rights 2010-2011. Oxford University Press, 2010.
Legislation.Gov.Uk. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga.
Lester, Anthony. ‘The Utility of the Human Rights Act: A Reply to Keith Ewing’. Public Law, no. Sum, 2005, pp. 249–58, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A43231E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
Leyland, Peter. The Constitution of the United Kingdom: A Contextual Analysis. 2nd ed, vol. Constitutional systems of the world, Hart Publishing, 2012.
Leyland, Peter, and Gordon Anthony. Textbook on Administrative Law. 7th ed, Oxford University Press, 2013.
Loughlin, Martin. The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction. First edition, vol. Very Short Introductions, Oxford University Press, 2013.
M v Home Office [1993] UKHL 5 (27 July 1993). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1993/5.html.
MacCormick, Neil. ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’. The Modern Law Review, vol. 56, no. 1, 1993, pp. 1–18, http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1096572.
Masterman, Roger, and Se-shauna Wheatle. ‘A Common Law Resurgence in Rights Protection’. European Human Rights Law Review, vol. 1, 2015, pp. 57–65, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD718470ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E.
McKeever, David. ‘The Human Rights Act and Anti-Terrorism in the UK: One Great Leap Forward by Parliament, but Are the Courts Able to Slow the Steady Retreat That Has Followed?’ Public Law, no. Jan, 2010, pp. 110–39, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I67F11560E15B11DE88C6C8FBE711743E.
McLean, Iain, and Alistair McMillan. State of the Union: Unionism and the Alternatives in the United Kingdom since 1707. electronic resource, Oxford University Press, 2005, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199258201.001.0001.
McLean, Iain, and Scot Peterson. ‘Transitional Constitutionalism in the United Kingdom’. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 3, no. 4, 2014, pp. 1113–35, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I6587228063DF11E58BD8DD30ADE7CC2B.
Melton, James, et al. To Codify or Not to Codify? The Constitution Unit, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/162.pdf.
MoJ. Commission on a Bill of Rights: The Choice Before Us. IMB, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206065653/https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/cbr/uk-bill-rights-vol-1.pdf.
Mullock, Alexandra. ‘The Supreme Court Decision in Nicklinson: Human Rights, Criminal Wrongs and the Dilemma of Death’. Professional Negligence, vol. 31, no. 1, 2015, pp. 18–28, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9DF4F830B51711E49F8488D430410EF0.
Murkens, J. E. K. ‘The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, 2009, pp. 427–55, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp020.
New Statesman. electronic resource, 1996, http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1.
Obergefell v. Hodges No. 14–556. Supreme Court of the United States, 2014, http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf.
Oliver, Dawn. Constitutional Reform in the UK. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1743939.
Parliamentary Research Paper 04/31. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-31.
Peers, Steve. ‘European Integration and the European Union Act 2011: An Irresistible Force Meets an Immovable Object?’ Public Law, no. Jan, 2013, pp. 119–34, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBA050BB03F0711E2990CBEA3BDA0BE6D.
Poole, T. ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, 2003, pp. 435–54, https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.3.435.
Public Law. 1956, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I66580770A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true.
---.
R (on the Application of Nicklinson and Another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), R (on the Application of AM) (AP) (Respondent) v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) [2014] UKSC 38. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf.
R v Secretary of State for Transport Ex p Factortame Ltd (Interim Relief Order) [1990] UKHL 7 (26 July 1990). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/7.html.
Rawlings, Richard, et al., editors. Sovereignty and the Law: Domestic, European and International Perspectives. Oxford University Press, 2014, http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684069.001.0001.
Research Briefings - Individual Ministerial Accountability (2012). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06467.
Russell, Meg. The Contemporary House of Lords: Westminster Bicameralism Revived. Oxford University Press, 2013.
Sales, Philip, and Richard Ekins. ‘Rights-Consistent Interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’. Law Quarterly Review, no. 127(Apr), 2011, pp. 217–38, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7DFA62304E5611E0B91FA9F94CE59879.
Sedley, Stephen. ‘Human Rights: A Twenty-First Century Agenda’. Public Law, no. Aut, 1995, pp. 386–400, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38FBAC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Society of Public Teachers of Law (London, England). Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars.
Stephenson, Scott. ‘The Supreme Court’s Renewed Interest in Autochthonous Constitutionalism’. Public Law, 2015, https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad6ada60000016436a303cb1194d14a&docguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&hitguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=2&resolvein=true.
Taylor, Robert Brett. ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency upon Conventions’. Public Law, 2015, pp. 614–32, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD.
The Cambridge Law Journal. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1737980.
The Economist. electronic resource, http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/41716.
The Guardian. electronic resource, 1980, http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1.
The Law Quarterly Review. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1742833.
The Modern Law Review.
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) (18 February 2002). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/195.html.
Tomkins, Adam. ‘National Security and the Role of the Court: A Changed Landscape?’ Law Quarterly Review, no. 126(Oct), 2010, pp. 543–67, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I0756BA21C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27.
Tomkins, Adam. Public Law. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Turpin, Colin, and Adam Tomkins. British Government and the Constitution: Text and Materials. 7th ed, electronic resource, vol. Law in context series, Cambridge University Press, 2012, http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=329861&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Wade, H. W. R. .. ‘What Has Happened to the Sovereignty of Parliament?’ Law Quarterly Review, no. 107(Jan), 1991, pp. 1–4, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICD256D10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Walter, John, et al. The Times. 1788, http://0-infotrac.galegroup.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/itweb/warwick?db=TTDA.
Wells, Callie E. ‘Obergefell v Hodges’. European Human Rights Law Review, no. 4, 2015, pp. 406–12, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I88B2E3B0411211E59CB8B97FD04D5F6C.
White, Richard. ‘Separation of Powers and Legislative Supremacy’. Law Quarterly Review, no. 127(Jul), 2011, pp. 456–74, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3C19CA009A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11.
Wicks, E. ‘The Supreme Court Judgment in Nicklinson: One Step Forward on Assisted Dying; Two Steps Back on Human Rights: A Commentary on The Supreme Court Judgment in R (Nicklinson) V Ministry Of Justice; R (AM) V Director Of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38.’ Medical Law Review, vol. 23, no. 1, 2015, pp. 144–56, https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwu031.
Wicks, Elizabeth. The Evolution of a Constitution: Eight Key Moments in British Constitutional History. Hart Pub, 2006.
William S. Hein & Company. The Law Quarterly Review. 1885, http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/lqr&collection=journals.
Woolf, Lord. ‘Droit Public - English Style’. Public Law, no. Spr, 1995, pp. 57–71, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38EF770E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028.
Young, A. L. ‘Sovereignty: Demise, Afterlife, or Partial Resurrection?’ International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 1, 2011, pp. 163–71, https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor028.
Young, Alison L. ‘Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: Avoiding the Deference Trap’. Public Law, no. Spr, 2005, pp. 23–34, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8499AAE0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A.
---. ‘In Defence of Due Deference’. Modern Law Review, vol. 72, no. 4, 2009, pp. 554–80, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x.
---. ‘Is Dialogue Working under the Human Rights Act 1998?’ Public Law, 2011, pp. 773–800, http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576.
---. Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. electronic resource, Hart Publishing, 2009, http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000473.html.
---. ‘Rule of Law in the United Kingdom: Formal or Substantive, The’. Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 6 (Law Journal Library), vol. 6, no. 1995–5855, 2012, http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vioincl6&g_sent=1&collection=journals&id=259.
