[1]
A. W. Bradley, K. D. Ewing, and C. Knight, Constitutional and administrative law, Sixteenth edition. Harlow, England: Pearson, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2741966
[2]
M. Elliott and R. Thomas, Public law, Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2017.
[3]
J. L. Jowell, D. Oliver, and C. O’Cinneide, The changing constitution, Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2015.
[4]
P. Leyland and G. Anthony, Textbook on administrative law, 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[5]
P. P. Craig, Administrative law, 7th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell, 2012.
[6]
C. Harlow and R. Rawlings, Law and administration, 3rd ed., vol. Law in context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=238868&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[7]
T. H. Bingham, The rule of law. London: Allen Lane, 2010.
[8]
P. Leyland, The constitution of the United Kingdom: a contextual analysis, 2nd ed., vol. Constitutional systems of the world. Oxford, UK: Hart Publishing, 2012.
[9]
M. Loughlin, The British constitution: a very short introduction, First edition., vol. Very Short Introductions. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[10]
V. Bogdanor, The new British Constitution. Oxford: Hart Pub, 2009.
[11]
A. King, The British constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
[12]
V. Bogdanor and British Academy, The British constitution in the twentieth century. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press, 2003.
[13]
A. Horne and G. Drewry, Eds., Parliament and the law, Second edition., vol. volume 8. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2018.
[14]
N. Bamforth and P. Leyland, Eds., Accountability in the contemporary constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.001.0001
[15]
Tomkins, Adam, Public law, vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[16]
T. Campbell, K. D. Ewing, and A. Tomkins, Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662633
[17]
D. Oliver, Constitutional reform in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[18]
Johnson, Nevil, Reshaping the British constitution: essays in political interpretation. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004.
[19]
C. Turpin and A. Tomkins, British government and the constitution: text and materials, 7th ed., vol. Law in context series. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=329861&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[20]
T. R. S. Allan, The sovereignty of law: freedom, constitution and common law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.001.0001
[21]
A. Kavanagh, Constitutional review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511724374
[22]
A. L. Young, Parliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000473.html
[23]
T. Hickman and P. P. Craig, Public law after the Human Rights Act. Oxford: Hart Pub, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2544638
[24]
A. D. P. Brady, Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[25]
‘Jackson and others (Appellants) v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [2005] UKHL 56’. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051013/jack.pdf
[26]
‘Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) (18 February 2002)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/195.html
[27]
D. Campbell and J. Young, ‘The metric martyrs and the entrenchment jurisprudence of Lord Justice Laws’, Public Law, no. Aut, pp. 399–406, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F6E3A1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[28]
N. W. Barber, ‘The afterlife of Parliamentary sovereignty’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 144–154, 2011, doi: 10.1093/icon/mor023. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/icon/mor023
[29]
A. L. Young, ‘Sovereignty: Demise, afterlife, or partial resurrection?’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 163–171, 2011, doi: 10.1093/icon/mor028. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/icon/mor028
[30]
T. R. S. Allan, ‘Parliamentary sovereignty: law, politics, and revolution’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 113(Jul), pp. 443–452, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F70AB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[31]
M. Gordon, ‘The conceptual foundations of parliamentary sovereignty: reconsidering Jennings and Wade’, Public Law, no. Jul, pp. 519–543, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3E10D5B1727E11DE8047B748D67C18CA
[32]
J. D. Goldsworthy, The sovereignty of Parliament: history and philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248087.001.0001
[33]
J. Laws, ‘Law and democracy’, Public Law, no. Spr, pp. 72–93, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID390A520E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[34]
J. D. Goldsworthy, Parliamentary sovereignty: contemporary debates, vol. Cambridge studies in constitutional law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277078&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[35]
E. Wicks, The evolution of a constitution: eight key moments in British constitutional history. Oxford: Hart Pub, 2006.
[36]
R. Rawlings, P. Leyland, and A. L. Young, Eds., Sovereignty and the law: domestic, European and international perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684069.001.0001
[37]
N. MacCormick, ‘Beyond the Sovereign State’, The Modern Law Review, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 1993 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1096572
[38]
P. P. Craig, ‘Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework’, Public Law, pp. 467–487, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID15274F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[39]
‘Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1765/J98.html
[40]
‘M v Home Office [1993] UKHL 5 (27 July 1993)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1993/5.html
[41]
T. R. S. Allan, ‘Questions of legality and legitimacy: Form and substance in British constitutionalism’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 155–162, 2011, doi: 10.1093/icon/mor017. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/icon/mor017
[42]
A. L. Young, ‘Rule of Law in the United Kingdom: Formal or Substantive, The’, Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 6 (Law Journal Library), vol. 6, no. 1995–5855, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vioincl6&g_sent=1&collection=journals&id=259
[43]
T. R. S. Allan, Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
[44]
T. R. S. Allan, Constitutional justice: a liberal theory of the rule of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001
[45]
J. Jowell, ‘Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis’, Public Law, no. Aut, pp. 562–580, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF0D05E100D4A11DB9253D431BB978268
[46]
Lord Woolf, ‘Droit public - English style’, Public Law, no. Spr, pp. 57–71, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38EF770E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[47]
S. Sedley, ‘Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda’, Public Law, no. Aut, pp. 386–400, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38FBAC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[48]
‘European Communities Act 1972’. Statute Law Database [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68/contents
[49]
‘R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Factortame Ltd (Interim Relief Order) [1990] UKHL 7 (26 July 1990)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/7.html
[50]
‘HS2 Alliance Case’. [Online]. Available: https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0172_Judgment.pdf
[51]
P. Craig, ‘Constitutionalising constitutional law: HS2’, Public Law, no. Jul, pp. 373–392, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A13AB0F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A
[52]
M. Elliott, ‘Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom’s Contemporary Constitution’, European Constitutional Law Review, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 379–392, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1648045830?accountid=14888
[53]
Craig, Paul, ‘The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality’, Common Market Law Review, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 1915–1944 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.kluwerlawonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011074
[54]
S. Peers, ‘European integration and the European Union Act 2011: an irresistible force meets an immovable object?’, Public Law, no. Jan, pp. 119–134, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBA050BB03F0711E2990CBEA3BDA0BE6D
[55]
M. Gordon and M. Dougan, ‘The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: “who won the bloody war anyway?”’, European Law Review, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3–30, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID13B043050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9
[56]
H. W. R. . Wade, ‘What has happened to the sovereignty of Parliament?’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 107(Jan), pp. 1–4, 1991 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICD256D10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[57]
‘House of Commons - The EU Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty - European Scrutiny Committee’. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/633/63302.htm
[58]
‘House of Commons - The EU Bill: Restrictions on Treaties and Decisions relating to the EU - European Scrutiny Committee’. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/682/68202.htm
[59]
‘R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), R (on the application of AM) (AP) (Respondent) v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) [2014] UKSC 38’. [Online]. Available: https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf
[60]
J. Finnis, ‘A British “Convention right” to assistance in suicide?’, Law Quarterly Review, vol. 131, pp. 1–8, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I34BAA2907BAE11E49BBC911AA7DF78F5
[61]
C. Draghici, ‘The blanket ban on assisted suicide: between moral paternalism and utilitarian justice’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 3, pp. 286–297, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I293F05E026F411E58A24809D3D7EB82F
[62]
E. Wicks, ‘The Supreme Court Judgment in Nicklinson: One Step Forward on Assisted Dying; Two Steps Back on Human Rights: A Commentary on The Supreme Court Judgment in R (Nicklinson) V Ministry Of Justice; R (AM) V Director Of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38.’, Medical Law Review, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 144–156, 2015, doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwu031. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/medlaw/fwu031
[63]
A. Mullock, ‘The Supreme Court decision in Nicklinson: human rights, criminal wrongs and the dilemma of death’, Professional Negligence, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 18–28, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9DF4F830B51711E49F8488D430410EF0
[64]
R. Beaton, ‘The Boundaries of Proportionality Review and the End of Life’, Judicial Review, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 135–139, 2014, doi: 10.5235/10854681.19.3.135. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.5235/10854681.19.3.135
[65]
A. Kavanagh, ‘Defending deference in public law and constitutional theory’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 126(Apr), pp. 222–250, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069
[66]
A. L. Young, ‘In Defence of Due Deference’, Modern Law Review, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 554–580, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x
[67]
T. R. S. Allan, ‘Judicial deference and judicial review: legal doctrine and legal theory’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 127(Jan), pp. 96–117, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I20DA9E6008C611E0A451F66F817AC0EE
[68]
T. R. S. Allan, ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 671–695, 2006, doi: 10.1017/S0008197306007264. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/S0008197306007264
[69]
R. Clayton, ‘Judicial deference and “democratic dialogue”: the legitimacy of judicial intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998’, Public Law, no. Spr, pp. 33–47, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84927EF0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[70]
J. Jowell, ‘Judicial deference: servility, civility or institutional capacity?’, Public Law, pp. 592–601, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8487F7A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[71]
F. Klug, ‘Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act 1998’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 2, pp. 125–133, 2003 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A25D70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[72]
R. A. Edwards, ‘Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act’, Modern Law Review, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 859–882, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1468-2230.00413. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/1468-2230.00413
[73]
‘Obergefell v. Hodges No. 14–556’. Supreme Court of the United States, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
[74]
C. E. Wells, ‘Obergefell v Hodges’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 4, pp. 406–412, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I88B2E3B0411211E59CB8B97FD04D5F6C
[75]
‘Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) v. Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21’. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/bellin-1.htm
[76]
‘Ghaidan (Appellant) v. Godin-Mendoza (FC) (Respondent) [2004] UKHL 30’. [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040621/gha-1.htm
[77]
A. L. Young, ‘Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: avoiding the deference trap’, Public Law, no. Spr, pp. 23–34, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8499AAE0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[78]
A. Kavanagh, ‘The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 179–206, 2006, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqi049. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/ojls/gqi049
[79]
A. L. Young, ‘Is dialogue working under the Human Rights Act 1998?’, Public Law, pp. 773–800, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576
[80]
P. Sales and R. Ekins, ‘Rights-consistent interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 127(Apr), pp. 217–238, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7DFA62304E5611E0B91FA9F94CE59879
[81]
MoJ, ‘Commission on a Bill of Rights: The Choice Before Us’. IMB [Online]. Available: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206065653/https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/cbr/uk-bill-rights-vol-1.pdf
[82]
‘Coservatives on Bill of Rights’. [Online]. Available: https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20Files/human_rights.pdf
[83]
C. Gearty, ‘On fantasy island: British politics, English judges and the European Convention on Human Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD6D8CD0ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E
[84]
‘Human Rights Act Reform | UK Constitutional Law Association’. [Online]. Available: http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/tag/human-rights-act-reform/
[85]
F. Klug and A. Williams, ‘The choice before us? The report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights’, Public Law, no. Jul, pp. 459–468, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EDF7D0D7C911E29A79B66BE8E69D4B
[86]
M. Elliott, ‘A damp squib in the long grass: the report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights’, European Human Rights Law Review, vol. 2, pp. 137–151, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I4BCCF680A3E811E2A94CA75C16A20EA4
[87]
J. D. Heydon, ‘Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems?’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 130(Jul), pp. 392–412, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7CAEEF40F31C11E3847EA720781C7CD8
[88]
S. Foster, ‘Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998’, Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, vol. 179, no. 46, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5HK8-1J01-DYJF-G17K&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
[89]
K. D. Ewing, ‘The futility of the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, no. Win, pp. 829–852, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A8ED21E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[90]
K. D. Ewing and J.-C. Tham, ‘The continuing futility of the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, no. Win, pp. 668–693, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EAB8B099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26
[91]
A. Kavanagh, ‘Judging the judges under the Human Rights Act: deference, disillusionment and the “war on terror”’, Public Law, no. Apr, pp. 287–304, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFC2512E1231F11DEBA18CA797BE6038F
[92]
A. Lester, ‘The utility of the Human rights Act: a reply to Keith Ewing’, Public Law, no. Sum, pp. 249–258, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A43231E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[93]
A. Tomkins, ‘National security and the role of the court: a changed landscape?’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 126(Oct), pp. 543–567, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I0756BA21C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27
[94]
D. McKeever, ‘The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed?’, Public Law, no. Jan, pp. 110–139, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I67F11560E15B11DE88C6C8FBE711743E
[95]
C. A. Gearty, Liberty and security. Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2013.
[96]
J. E. K. Murkens, ‘The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 427–455, 2009, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqp020. [Online]. Available: https://academic.oup.com/ojls/article-abstract/29/3/427/1533571?redirectedFrom=fulltext
[97]
G. Gee and G. C. N. Webber, ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 273–299, 2010, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqq013. [Online]. Available: https://0-academic-oup-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ojls/article/30/2/273/1505202
[98]
T. Gyorfi, ‘Between Common Law Constitutionalism and Procedural Democracy’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 317–338, 2013, doi: 10.1093/ojls/gqt004. [Online]. Available: https://0-academic-oup-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ojls/article/33/2/317/1547137
[99]
T. Poole, ‘Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 435–454, 2003, doi: 10.1093/ojls/23.3.435. [Online]. Available: https://0-academic-oup-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ojls/article/23/3/435/1585696
[100]
C. M. G. Himsworth, ‘Devolution and its Jurisdictional Asymmetries’, Modern Law Review, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 31–58, 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00625.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00625.x
[101]
I. McLean and A. McMillan, State of the union: Unionism and the alternatives in the United Kingdom since 1707. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199258201.001.0001
[102]
T. H. Jones and J. M. Williams, ‘Wales as a jurisdiction’, Public Law, no. Spr, pp. 78–101, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I847E33A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
[103]
T. H. Jones, ‘Wales, Devolution and Sovereignty’, Statute Law Review, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 151–162, 2012, doi: 10.1093/slr/hms023. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/slr/hms023
[104]
I. McLean and S. Peterson, ‘Transitional constitutionalism in the United Kingdom’, Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1113–1135, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I6587228063DF11E58BD8DD30ADE7CC2B
[105]
N. Aroney, ‘Reserved matters, legislative purpose and the referendum on Scottish independence’, Public Law, no. Jul, pp. 422–445, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A24C20F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A
[106]
M. Elliott, ‘The Proposed Scotland Bill: The Constitutional Implications of Draft Clauses 1 and 2’, SSRN Electronic Journal, 2015, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2557451. [Online]. Available: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2557451
[107]
R. B. Taylor, ‘Foundational and regulatory conventions: exploring the constitutional significance of Britain’s dependency upon conventions’, Public Law, pp. 614–632, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD
[108]
‘Parliamentary Research Paper 04/31’. [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-31
[109]
‘Research Briefings - Individual ministerial accountability (2012)’. [Online]. Available: http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06467
[110]
M. Flinders, ‘The enduring centrality of individual ministerial responsibility within the British constitution’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 73–92, 2000, doi: 10.1080/13572330008420632. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/13572330008420632
[111]
E. Barendt, ‘Separation of powers and constitutional government’, Public Law, no. Win, pp. 599–619, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID3936440E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
[112]
N. W. Barber, ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’, The Cambridge Law Journal, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 59–88, 2001, doi: 10.1017/S0008197301000629. [Online]. Available: http://0-doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/S0008197301000629
[113]
R. White, ‘Separation of powers and legislative supremacy’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 127(Jul), pp. 456–474, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3C19CA009A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11
[114]
S. Stephenson, ‘The Supreme Court’s renewed interest in Autochthonous Constitutionalism’, Public Law, 2015 [Online]. Available: https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad6ada60000016436a303cb1194d14a&docguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&hitguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=2&resolvein=true
[115]
E. Bjorge, ‘Fundamental rights at English (and European?) common law’, Law Quarterly Review, no. 131(Apr), pp. 192–196, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9010B212C81111E4A0E9E7C45C1190E1
[116]
R. Masterman and S. Wheatle, ‘A Common law Resurgence in Rights Protection’, European Human Rights Law Review, vol. 1, pp. 57–65, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD718470ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E
[117]
R. Clayton, ‘The empire strikes back: common law rights and the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, no. Jan, pp. 3–12, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I28D78E607B4611E4A15DE99780331015
[118]
M. Russell, The contemporary House of Lords: Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
[119]
C. Ballinger, The House of Lords, 1911-2011: a century of non-reform, vol. Hart studies in constitutional law. Oxford: Hart, 2012.
[120]
J. Melton, C. Stuart, and D. Helen, ‘To Codify or not to Codify?’ The Constitution Unit [Online]. Available: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/162.pdf
[121]
A. Blick, ‘Codifying – or not codifying – the UK constitution: A Literature Review’. Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies King’s College London, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.parliament.uk/pagefiles/56954/CPCS%20Literature%20Review%20(4).pdf
[122]
‘A New Magna Carta’. 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/463/463.pdf
[123]
J. Walter et al., ‘The times’, 1788 [Online]. Available: http://0-infotrac.galegroup.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/itweb/warwick?db=TTDA
[124]
‘The guardian’, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1
[125]
‘The economist’ [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/41716
[126]
‘New statesman’, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1
[127]
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC., ‘Prospect: politics, essay, review’ [Online]. Available: http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB
[128]
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC., ‘The spectator’, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB
[129]
‘Public law’, 1956 [Online]. Available: http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I66580770A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
[131]
William S. Hein & Company, ‘The law quarterly review’, 1885 [Online]. Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/lqr&collection=journals
[132]
‘The Law quarterly review’ [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1742833
[133]
JSTOR (Organization) and William S. Hein & Company, ‘The modern law review’, 1937 [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2230
[134]
‘The Modern law review’.
[135]
Cambridge University Law Society, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, and William S. Hein & Company, ‘The Cambridge law journal’, 1921 [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/jid_Clj
[136]
‘The Cambridge law journal’ [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1737980
[137]
‘Oxford journal of legal studies’ [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1743939
[138]
Society of Public Teachers of Law (London, England), ‘Legal studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars’.
[139]
R. G. Lee, Blackstone’s statutes on public law and human rights 2010-2011, vol. Blackstone’s statutes series. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.
[140]
‘Legislation.gov.uk’. [Online]. Available: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga
[141]
‘British and Irish Legal Information Institute’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bailii.org/
