Bibliography for LA201: General Principles of Constitutional and Administrative Law BETA

A New Magna Carta. (2014). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/463/463.pdf

Allan, T. R. S. (1994). Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism. Clarendon Press.

Allan, T. R. S. (1997). Parliamentary sovereignty: law, politics, and revolution. Law Quarterly Review, 113(Jul), 443–452. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F70AB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Allan, T. R. S. (2005). Constitutional justice: a liberal theory of the rule of law [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001

Allan, T. R. S. (2006). Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”. The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007264

Allan, T. R. S. (2011a). Judicial deference and judicial review: legal doctrine and legal theory. Law Quarterly Review, 127(Jan), 96–117. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I20DA9E6008C611E0A451F66F817AC0EE

Allan, T. R. S. (2011b). Questions of legality and legitimacy: Form and substance in British constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor017

Allan, T. R. S. (2013). The sovereignty of law: freedom, constitution and common law. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.001.0001

Aroney, N. (2014). Reserved matters, legislative purpose and the referendum on Scottish independence. Public Law, Jul, 422–445. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A24C20F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A

Ballinger, C. (2012). The House of Lords, 1911-2011: a century of non-reform: Vol. Hart studies in constitutional law. Hart.

Bamforth, N., & Leyland, P. (Eds.). (2014). Accountability in the contemporary constitution. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.001.0001

Barber, N. W. (2001). Prelude to the Separation of Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal, 60(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197301000629

Barber, N. W. (2011). The afterlife of Parliamentary sovereignty. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor023

Barendt, E. (1995). Separation of powers and constitutional government. Public Law, Win, 599–619. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID3936440E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

Beaton, R. (2014). The Boundaries of Proportionality Review and the End of Life. Judicial Review, 19(3), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.5235/10854681.19.3.135

Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) v. Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/bellin-1.htm

Bingham, T. H. (2010). The rule of law. Allen Lane.

Bjorge, E. (2015). Fundamental rights at English (and European?) common law. Law Quarterly Review, 131(Apr), 192–196. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9010B212C81111E4A0E9E7C45C1190E1

Blick, A. (2011). Codifying – or not codifying – the UK constitution: A Literature Review. Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies  King’s College London. http://www.parliament.uk/pagefiles/56954/CPCS%20Literature%20Review%20(4).pdf

Bogdanor, V. (2009). The new British Constitution. Hart Pub.

Bogdanor, V. & British Academy. (2003). The British constitution in the twentieth century. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.

Bradley, A. W., Ewing, K. D., & Knight, C. (2014). Constitutional and administrative law (Sixteenth edition). Pearson. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2741966

Brady, A. D. P. (2012). Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge University Press.

British and Irish Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/

Cambridge University Law Society, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, & William S. Hein & Company. (1921). The Cambridge law journal [Electronic resource]. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/jid_Clj

Campbell, D., & Young, J. (2002). The metric martyrs and the entrenchment jurisprudence of Lord Justice Laws. Public Law, Aut, 399–406. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F6E3A1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Campbell, T., Ewing, K. D., & Tomkins, A. (2001). Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford University Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662633

Clayton, R. (2004). Judicial deference and ‘democratic dialogue’: the legitimacy of judicial intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998. Public Law, Spr, 33–47. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84927EF0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Clayton, R. (2015). The empire strikes back: common law rights and the Human Rights Act. Public Law, Jan, 3–12. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I28D78E607B4611E4A15DE99780331015

Coservatives on Bill of Rights. (n.d.). https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20Files/human_rights.pdf

Craig, P. (2014). Constitutionalising constitutional law: HS2. Public Law, Jul, 373–392. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A13AB0F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A

Craig, P. P. (1997). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. Public Law, 467–487. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID15274F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

Craig, P. P. (2012). Administrative law (7th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.

Craig, Paul. (n.d.). The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality. Common Market Law Review, 48(6), 1915–1944. http://0-www.kluwerlawonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011074

Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. (n.d.). Prospect: politics, essay, review [Electronic resource]. http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB

Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. (1994). The spectator [Electronic resource]. http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB

Draghici, C. (2015). The blanket ban on assisted suicide: between moral paternalism and utilitarian justice. European Human Rights Law Review, 3, 286–297. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I293F05E026F411E58A24809D3D7EB82F

Edwards, R. A. (2002). Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act. Modern Law Review, 65(6), 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00413

Elliott, M. (2013). A damp squib in the long grass: the report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 137–151. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I4BCCF680A3E811E2A94CA75C16A20EA4

Elliott, M. (2014). Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom’s Contemporary Constitution. European Constitutional Law Review, 10(3), 379–392. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1648045830?accountid=14888

Elliott, M. (2015). The Proposed Scotland Bill: The Constitutional Implications of Draft Clauses 1 and 2. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557451

Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2017). Public law (Third edition). Oxford University Press.

Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1765/J98.html

European Communities Act 1972. (n.d.). Statute Law Database. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68/contents

Ewing, K. D. (2004). The futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law, Win, 829–852. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A8ED21E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Ewing, K. D., & Tham, J.-C. (2008). The continuing futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law, Win, 668–693. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EAB8B099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26

Finnis, J. (2015). A British ‘Convention right’ to assistance in suicide? Law Quarterly Review, 131, 1–8. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I34BAA2907BAE11E49BBC911AA7DF78F5

Flinders, M. (2000). The enduring centrality of individual ministerial responsibility within the British constitution. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 6(3), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330008420632

Foster, S. (2015). Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, 179(46). http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5HK8-1J01-DYJF-G17K&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t

Gearty, C. (2015). On fantasy island: British politics, English judges and the European Convention on Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 1–8. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD6D8CD0ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E

Gearty, C. A. (2013). Liberty and security. Polity.

Gee, G., & Webber, G. C. N. (2010). What Is a Political Constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013

Ghaidan (Appellant) v. Godin-Mendoza (FC) (Respondent) [2004] UKHL 30. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040621/gha-1.htm

Goldsworthy, J. D. (2001). The sovereignty of Parliament: history and philosophy [Electronic resource]. Clarendon. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248087.001.0001

Goldsworthy, J. D. (2010). Parliamentary sovereignty: contemporary debates: Vol. Cambridge studies in constitutional law [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277078&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth

Gordon, M. (2009). The conceptual foundations of parliamentary sovereignty: reconsidering Jennings and Wade. Public Law, Jul, 519–543. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3E10D5B1727E11DE8047B748D67C18CA

Gordon, M., & Dougan, M. (2012). The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: ‘who won the bloody war anyway?’ European Law Review, 37(1), 3–30. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID13B043050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9

Gyorfi, T. (2013). Between Common Law Constitutionalism and Procedural Democracy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt004

Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2009). Law and administration: Vol. Law in context (3rd ed) [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=238868&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth

Heydon, J. D. (2014). Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review, 130(Jul), 392–412. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7CAEEF40F31C11E3847EA720781C7CD8

Hickman, T., & Craig, P. P. (2010). Public law after the Human Rights Act. Hart Pub. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2544638

Himsworth, C. M. G. (2007). Devolution and its Jurisdictional Asymmetries. Modern Law Review, 70(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00625.x

Horne, A., & Drewry, G. (Eds.). (2018). Parliament and the law: Vol. volume 8 (Second edition). Hart Publishing.

House of Commons - The EU Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty - European Scrutiny Committee. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/633/63302.htm

House of Commons - The EU Bill: Restrictions on Treaties and Decisions relating to the EU - European Scrutiny Committee. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/682/68202.htm

HS2 Alliance Case. (n.d.). https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0172_Judgment.pdf

Human Rights Act Reform | UK Constitutional Law Association. (n.d.). http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/tag/human-rights-act-reform/

Jackson and others (Appellants)  v.  Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [2005] UKHL 56. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051013/jack.pdf

Johnson, Nevil. (2004). Reshaping the British constitution: essays in political interpretation. Palgrave Macmillan.

Jones, T. H. (2012). Wales, Devolution and Sovereignty. Statute Law Review, 33(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hms023

Jones, T. H., & Williams, J. M. (2004). Wales as a jurisdiction. Public Law, Spr, 78–101. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I847E33A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Jowell, J. (2003). Judicial deference: servility, civility or institutional capacity? Public Law, 592–601. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8487F7A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Jowell, J. (2006). Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis. Public Law, Aut, 562–580. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF0D05E100D4A11DB9253D431BB978268

Jowell, J. L., Oliver, D., & O’Cinneide, C. (2015). The changing constitution (Eighth edition). Oxford University Press.

JSTOR (Organization) & William S. Hein & Company. (1937). The modern law review [Electronic resource]. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2230

Kavanagh, A. (2006). The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi049

Kavanagh, A. (2009a). Constitutional review under the UK Human Rights Act [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511724374

Kavanagh, A. (2009b). Judging the judges under the Human Rights Act: deference, disillusionment and the ‘war on terror’. Public Law, Apr, 287–304. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFC2512E1231F11DEBA18CA797BE6038F

Kavanagh, A. (2010). Defending deference in public law and constitutional theory. Law Quarterly Review, 126(Apr), 222–250. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069

King, A. (2009). The British constitution [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001

Klug, F. (2003). Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act 1998. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 125–133. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A25D70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Klug, F., & Williams, A. (2013). The choice before us? The report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights. Public Law, Jul, 459–468. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EDF7D0D7C911E29A79B66BE8E69D4B

Laws, J. (1995). Law and democracy. Public Law, Spr, 72–93. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID390A520E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

Lee, R. G. (2010). Blackstone’s statutes on public law and human rights 2010-2011: Vol. Blackstone’s statutes series. Oxford University Press.

Legislation.gov.uk. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga

Lester, A. (2005). The utility of the Human rights Act: a reply to Keith Ewing. Public Law, Sum, 249–258. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A43231E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Leyland, P. (2012). The constitution of the United Kingdom: a contextual analysis: Vol. Constitutional systems of the world (2nd ed). Hart Publishing.

Leyland, P., & Anthony, G. (2013). Textbook on administrative law (7th ed). Oxford University Press.

Loughlin, M. (2013). The British constitution: a very short introduction: Vol. Very Short Introductions (First edition). Oxford University Press.

M v Home Office [1993] UKHL 5 (27 July 1993). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1993/5.html

MacCormick, N. (1993). Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review, 56(1), 1–18. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1096572

Masterman, R., & Wheatle, S. (2015). A Common law Resurgence in Rights Protection. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 57–65. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD718470ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E

McKeever, D. (2010). The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed? Public Law, Jan, 110–139. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I67F11560E15B11DE88C6C8FBE711743E

McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2005). State of the union: Unionism and the alternatives in the United Kingdom since 1707 [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199258201.001.0001

McLean, I., & Peterson, S. (2014). Transitional constitutionalism in the United Kingdom. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 3(4), 1113–1135. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I6587228063DF11E58BD8DD30ADE7CC2B

Melton, J., Stuart, C., & Helen, D. (n.d.). To Codify or not to Codify? The Constitution Unit. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/162.pdf

MoJ. (n.d.). Commission on a Bill of Rights: The Choice Before Us. IMB. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206065653/https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/cbr/uk-bill-rights-vol-1.pdf

Mullock, A. (2015). The Supreme Court decision in Nicklinson: human rights, criminal wrongs and the dilemma of death. Professional Negligence, 31(1), 18–28. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9DF4F830B51711E49F8488D430410EF0

Murkens, J. E. K. (2009). The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(3), 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp020

New statesman. (1996). [Electronic resource]. http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1

Obergefell v. Hodges No. 14–556. (2014). Supreme Court of the United States. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf

Oliver, D. (2003). Constitutional reform in the UK. Oxford University Press.

Oxford journal of legal studies. (n.d.). http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1743939

Parliamentary Research Paper 04/31. (n.d.). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-31

Peers, S. (2013). European integration and the European Union Act 2011: an irresistible force meets an immovable object? Public Law, Jan, 119–134. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBA050BB03F0711E2990CBEA3BDA0BE6D

Poole, T. (2003). Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.3.435

Public law. (n.d.).

Public law. (1956). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I66580770A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true

R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), R (on the application of AM) (AP) (Respondent) v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) [2014] UKSC 38. (n.d.). https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf

R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Factortame Ltd (Interim Relief Order) [1990] UKHL 7 (26 July 1990). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/7.html

Rawlings, R., Leyland, P., & Young, A. L. (Eds.). (2014). Sovereignty and the law: domestic, European and international perspectives. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684069.001.0001

Research Briefings - Individual ministerial accountability (2012). (n.d.). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06467

Russell, M. (2013). The contemporary House of Lords: Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford University Press.

Sales, P., & Ekins, R. (2011). Rights-consistent interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998. Law Quarterly Review, 127(Apr), 217–238. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7DFA62304E5611E0B91FA9F94CE59879

Sedley, S. (1995). Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda. Public Law, Aut, 386–400. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38FBAC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

Society of Public Teachers of Law (London, England). (n.d.). Legal studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars.

Stephenson, S. (2015). The Supreme Court’s renewed interest in Autochthonous Constitutionalism. Public Law. https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad6ada60000016436a303cb1194d14a&docguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&hitguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=2&resolvein=true

Taylor, R. B. (2015). Foundational and regulatory conventions: exploring the constitutional significance of Britain’s dependency upon conventions. Public Law, 614–632. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD

The Cambridge law journal. (n.d.). http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1737980

The economist. (n.d.). [Electronic resource]. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/41716

The guardian. (1980). [Electronic resource]. http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1

The Law quarterly review. (n.d.). http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1742833

The Modern law review. (n.d.).

Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) (18 February 2002). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/195.html

Tomkins, A. (2010). National security and the role of the court: a changed landscape? Law Quarterly Review, 126(Oct), 543–567. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I0756BA21C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27

Tomkins, Adam. (2003). Public law: Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford University Press.

Turpin, C., & Tomkins, A. (2012). British government and the constitution: text and materials: Vol. Law in context series (7th ed) [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=329861&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth

Wade, H. W. R. . (1991). What has happened to the sovereignty of Parliament? Law Quarterly Review, 107(Jan), 1–4. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICD256D10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

Walter, J., Finey, W., Walter, W., Walter, J., Robinson, H. C., Stoddart, J., Barnes, T., Delane, J. T., Chenery, T., Buckle, G. E., Dawson, G., Casey, W. F., & Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. (1788). The times. http://0-infotrac.galegroup.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/itweb/warwick?db=TTDA

Wells, C. E. (2015). Obergefell v Hodges. European Human Rights Law Review, 4, 406–412. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I88B2E3B0411211E59CB8B97FD04D5F6C

White, R. (2011). Separation of powers and legislative supremacy. Law Quarterly Review, 127(Jul), 456–474. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3C19CA009A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11

Wicks, E. (2006). The evolution of a constitution: eight key moments in British constitutional history. Hart Pub.

Wicks, E. (2015). The Supreme Court Judgment in Nicklinson: One Step Forward on Assisted Dying; Two Steps Back on Human Rights: A Commentary on The Supreme Court Judgment in R (Nicklinson) V Ministry Of Justice; R (AM) V Director Of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38. Medical Law Review, 23(1), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwu031

William S. Hein & Company. (1885). The law quarterly review. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/lqr&collection=journals

Woolf, Lord. (1995). Droit public - English style. Public Law, Spr, 57–71. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38EF770E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028

Young, A. L. (2005). Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: avoiding the deference trap. Public Law, Spr, 23–34. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8499AAE0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A

Young, A. L. (2009a). In Defence of Due Deference. Modern Law Review, 72(4), 554–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x

Young, A. L. (2009b). Parliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act [Electronic resource]. Hart Publishing. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000473.html

Young, A. L. (2011a). Is dialogue working under the Human Rights Act 1998? Public Law, 773–800. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576

Young, A. L. (2011b). Sovereignty: Demise, afterlife, or partial resurrection? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor028

Young, A. L. (2012). Rule of Law in the United Kingdom: Formal or Substantive, The. Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 6 (Law Journal Library), 6(1995–5855). http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vioincl6&g_sent=1&collection=journals&id=259