1
Bradley AW, Ewing KD, Knight C. Constitutional and administrative law. Sixteenth edition. Harlow, England: : Pearson 2014. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2741966
2
Elliott M, Thomas R. Public law. Third edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2017.
3
Jowell JL, Oliver D, O’Cinneide C. The changing constitution. Eighth edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2015.
4
Leyland P, Anthony G. Textbook on administrative law. 7th ed. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
5
Craig PP. Administrative law. 7th ed. London: : Sweet & Maxwell 2012.
6
Harlow C, Rawlings R. Law and administration. 3rd ed. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=238868&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
7
Bingham TH. The rule of law. London: : Allen Lane 2010.
8
Leyland P. The constitution of the United Kingdom: a contextual analysis. 2nd ed. Oxford, UK: : Hart Publishing 2012.
9
Loughlin M. The British constitution: a very short introduction. First edition. Oxford, United Kingdom: : Oxford University Press 2013.
10
Bogdanor V. The new British Constitution. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2009.
11
King A. The British constitution. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2009. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
12
Bogdanor V, British Academy. The British constitution in the twentieth century. Oxford: : Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press 2003.
13
Horne A, Drewry G, editors. Parliament and the law. Second edition. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2018.
14
Bamforth N, Leyland P, editors. Accountability in the contemporary constitution. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.001.0001
15
Tomkins, Adam. Public law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
16
Campbell T, Ewing KD, Tomkins A. Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2001. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662633
17
Oliver D. Constitutional reform in the UK. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2003.
18
Johnson, Nevil. Reshaping the British constitution: essays in political interpretation. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: : Palgrave Macmillan 2004.
19
Turpin C, Tomkins A. British government and the constitution: text and materials. 7th ed. Cambridge, UK: : Cambridge University Press 2012. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=329861&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
20
Allan TRS. The sovereignty of law: freedom, constitution and common law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.001.0001
21
Kavanagh A. Constitutional review under the UK Human Rights Act. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2009. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511724374
22
Young AL. Parliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act. Oxford: : Hart Publishing 2009. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000473.html
23
Hickman T, Craig PP. Public law after the Human Rights Act. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2010. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2544638
24
Brady ADP. Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2012.
25
Jackson and others (Appellants) v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [2005] UKHL 56. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051013/jack.pdf
26
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) (18 February 2002). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/195.html
27
Campbell D, Young J. The metric martyrs and the entrenchment jurisprudence of Lord Justice Laws. Public Law 2002;:399–406.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F6E3A1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
28
Barber NW. The afterlife of Parliamentary sovereignty. International Journal of Constitutional Law 2011;9:144–54. doi:10.1093/icon/mor023
29
Young AL. Sovereignty: Demise, afterlife, or partial resurrection? International Journal of Constitutional Law 2011;9:163–71. doi:10.1093/icon/mor028
30
Allan TRS. Parliamentary sovereignty: law, politics, and revolution. Law Quarterly Review 1997;:443–52.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F70AB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
31
Gordon M. The conceptual foundations of parliamentary sovereignty: reconsidering Jennings and Wade. Public Law 2009;:519–43.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3E10D5B1727E11DE8047B748D67C18CA
32
Goldsworthy JD. The sovereignty of Parliament: history and philosophy. Oxford: : Clarendon 2001. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248087.001.0001
33
Laws J. Law and democracy. Public Law 1995;:72–93.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID390A520E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
34
Goldsworthy JD. Parliamentary sovereignty: contemporary debates. Cambridge: : Cambridge University Press 2010. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277078&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
35
Wicks E. The evolution of a constitution: eight key moments in British constitutional history. Oxford: : Hart Pub 2006.
36
Rawlings R, Leyland P, Young AL, editors. Sovereignty and the law: domestic, European and international perspectives. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2014. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684069.001.0001
37
MacCormick N. Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review 1993;56:1–18.http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1096572
38
Craig PP. Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. Public Law 1997;:467–87.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID15274F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
39
Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1765/J98.html
40
M v Home Office [1993] UKHL 5 (27 July 1993). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1993/5.html
41
Allan TRS. Questions of legality and legitimacy: Form and substance in British constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law 2011;9:155–62. doi:10.1093/icon/mor017
42
Young AL. Rule of Law in the United Kingdom: Formal or Substantive, The. Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 6 (Law Journal Library) 2012;6.http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vioincl6&g_sent=1&collection=journals&id=259
43
Allan TRS. Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism. Oxford: : Clarendon Press 1994.
44
Allan TRS. Constitutional justice: a liberal theory of the rule of law. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001
45
Jowell J. Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis. Public Law 2006;:562–80.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF0D05E100D4A11DB9253D431BB978268
46
Woolf, Lord. Droit public - English style. Public Law 1995;:57–71.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38EF770E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
47
Sedley S. Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda. Public Law 1995;:386–400.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38FBAC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
48
European Communities Act 1972. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68/contents
49
R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Factortame Ltd (Interim Relief Order) [1990] UKHL 7 (26 July 1990). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/7.html
50
HS2 Alliance Case. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0172_Judgment.pdf
51
Craig P. Constitutionalising constitutional law: HS2. Public Law 2014;:373–92.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A13AB0F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A
52
Elliott M. Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom’s Contemporary Constitution. European Constitutional Law Review 2014;10:379–92.http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1648045830?accountid=14888
53
Craig, Paul. The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality. Common Market Law Review;48:1915–44.http://0-www.kluwerlawonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011074
54
Peers S. European integration and the European Union Act 2011: an irresistible force meets an immovable object? Public Law 2013;:119–34.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBA050BB03F0711E2990CBEA3BDA0BE6D
55
Gordon M, Dougan M. The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: ‘who won the bloody war anyway?’ European Law Review 2012;37:3–30.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID13B043050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9
56
Wade HWR. What has happened to the sovereignty of Parliament? Law Quarterly Review 1991;:1–4.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICD256D10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
57
House of Commons - The EU Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty - European Scrutiny Committee. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/633/63302.htm
58
House of Commons - The EU Bill: Restrictions on Treaties and Decisions relating to the EU - European Scrutiny Committee. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/682/68202.htm
59
R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), R (on the application of AM) (AP) (Respondent) v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) [2014] UKSC 38. https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf
60
Finnis J. A British ‘Convention right’ to assistance in suicide? Law Quarterly Review 2015;131:1–8.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I34BAA2907BAE11E49BBC911AA7DF78F5
61
Draghici C. The blanket ban on assisted suicide: between moral paternalism and utilitarian justice. European Human Rights Law Review 2015;:286–97.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I293F05E026F411E58A24809D3D7EB82F
62
Wicks E. The Supreme Court Judgment in Nicklinson: One Step Forward on Assisted Dying; Two Steps Back on Human Rights: A Commentary on The Supreme Court Judgment in R (Nicklinson) V Ministry Of Justice; R (AM) V Director Of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38. Medical Law Review 2015;23:144–56. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwu031
63
Mullock A. The Supreme Court decision in Nicklinson: human rights, criminal wrongs and the dilemma of death. Professional Negligence 2015;31:18–28.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9DF4F830B51711E49F8488D430410EF0
64
Beaton R. The Boundaries of Proportionality Review and the End of Life. Judicial Review 2014;19:135–9. doi:10.5235/10854681.19.3.135
65
Kavanagh A. Defending deference in public law and constitutional theory. Law Quarterly Review 2010;:222–50.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069
66
Young AL. In Defence of Due Deference. Modern Law Review 2009;72:554–80. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x
67
Allan TRS. Judicial deference and judicial review: legal doctrine and legal theory. Law Quarterly Review 2011;:96–117.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I20DA9E6008C611E0A451F66F817AC0EE
68
Allan TRS. Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”. The Cambridge Law Journal 2006;65:671–95. doi:10.1017/S0008197306007264
69
Clayton R. Judicial deference and ‘democratic dialogue’: the legitimacy of judicial intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998. Public Law 2004;:33–47.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84927EF0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
70
Jowell J. Judicial deference: servility, civility or institutional capacity? Public Law 2003;:592–601.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8487F7A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
71
Klug F. Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act 1998. European Human Rights Law Review 2003;:125–33.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A25D70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
72
Edwards RA. Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act. Modern Law Review 2002;65:859–82. doi:10.1111/1468-2230.00413
73
Obergefell v. Hodges No. 14–556. 2014.http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
74
Wells CE. Obergefell v Hodges. European Human Rights Law Review 2015;:406–12.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I88B2E3B0411211E59CB8B97FD04D5F6C
75
Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) v. Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/bellin-1.htm
76
Ghaidan (Appellant) v. Godin-Mendoza (FC) (Respondent) [2004] UKHL 30. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040621/gha-1.htm
77
Young AL. Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: avoiding the deference trap. Public Law 2005;:23–34.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8499AAE0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
78
Kavanagh A. The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2006;26:179–206. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqi049
79
Young AL. Is dialogue working under the Human Rights Act 1998? Public Law 2011;:773–800.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576
80
Sales P, Ekins R. Rights-consistent interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998. Law Quarterly Review 2011;:217–38.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7DFA62304E5611E0B91FA9F94CE59879
81
MoJ. Commission on a Bill of Rights: The Choice Before Us. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206065653/https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/cbr/uk-bill-rights-vol-1.pdf
82
Coservatives on Bill of Rights. https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20Files/human_rights.pdf
83
Gearty C. On fantasy island: British politics, English judges and the European Convention on Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review 2015;:1–8.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD6D8CD0ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E
84
Human Rights Act Reform | UK Constitutional Law Association. http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/tag/human-rights-act-reform/
85
Klug F, Williams A. The choice before us? The report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights. Public Law 2013;:459–68.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EDF7D0D7C911E29A79B66BE8E69D4B
86
Elliott M. A damp squib in the long grass: the report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights. European Human Rights Law Review 2013;2:137–51.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I4BCCF680A3E811E2A94CA75C16A20EA4
87
Heydon JD. Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review 2014;:392–412.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7CAEEF40F31C11E3847EA720781C7CD8
88
Foster S. Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly 2015;179.http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5HK8-1J01-DYJF-G17K&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
89
Ewing KD. The futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law 2004;:829–52.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A8ED21E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
90
Ewing KD, Tham J-C. The continuing futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law 2008;:668–93.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EAB8B099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26
91
Kavanagh A. Judging the judges under the Human Rights Act: deference, disillusionment and the ‘war on terror’. Public Law 2009;:287–304.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFC2512E1231F11DEBA18CA797BE6038F
92
Lester A. The utility of the Human rights Act: a reply to Keith Ewing. Public Law 2005;:249–58.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A43231E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
93
Tomkins A. National security and the role of the court: a changed landscape? Law Quarterly Review 2010;:543–67.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I0756BA21C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27
94
McKeever D. The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed? Public Law 2010;:110–39.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I67F11560E15B11DE88C6C8FBE711743E
95
Gearty CA. Liberty and security. Cambridge, UK: : Polity 2013.
96
Murkens JEK. The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2009;29:427–55. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqp020
97
Gee G, Webber GCN. What Is a Political Constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2010;30:273–99. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqq013
98
Gyorfi T. Between Common Law Constitutionalism and Procedural Democracy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2013;33:317–38. doi:10.1093/ojls/gqt004
99
Poole T. Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 2003;23:435–54. doi:10.1093/ojls/23.3.435
100
Himsworth CMG. Devolution and its Jurisdictional Asymmetries. Modern Law Review 2007;70:31–58. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00625.x
101
McLean I, McMillan A. State of the union: Unionism and the alternatives in the United Kingdom since 1707. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2005. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199258201.001.0001
102
Jones TH, Williams JM. Wales as a jurisdiction. Public Law 2004;:78–101.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I847E33A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
103
Jones TH. Wales, Devolution and Sovereignty. Statute Law Review 2012;33:151–62. doi:10.1093/slr/hms023
104
McLean I, Peterson S. Transitional constitutionalism in the United Kingdom. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law 2014;3:1113–35.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I6587228063DF11E58BD8DD30ADE7CC2B
105
Aroney N. Reserved matters, legislative purpose and the referendum on Scottish independence. Public Law 2014;:422–45.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A24C20F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A
106
Elliott M. The Proposed Scotland Bill: The Constitutional Implications of Draft Clauses 1 and 2. SSRN Electronic Journal Published Online First: 2015. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2557451
107
Taylor RB. Foundational and regulatory conventions: exploring the constitutional significance of Britain’s dependency upon conventions. Public Law 2015;:614–32.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD
108
Parliamentary Research Paper 04/31. http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-31
109
Research Briefings - Individual ministerial accountability (2012). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06467
110
Flinders M. The enduring centrality of individual ministerial responsibility within the British constitution. The Journal of Legislative Studies 2000;6:73–92. doi:10.1080/13572330008420632
111
Barendt E. Separation of powers and constitutional government. Public Law 1995;:599–619.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID3936440E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
112
Barber NW. Prelude to the Separation of Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal 2001;60:59–88. doi:10.1017/S0008197301000629
113
White R. Separation of powers and legislative supremacy. Law Quarterly Review 2011;:456–74.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3C19CA009A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11
114
Stephenson S. The Supreme Court’s renewed interest in Autochthonous Constitutionalism. Public Law Published Online First: 2015.https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad6ada60000016436a303cb1194d14a&docguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&hitguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=2&resolvein=true
115
Bjorge E. Fundamental rights at English (and European?) common law. Law Quarterly Review 2015;:192–6.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9010B212C81111E4A0E9E7C45C1190E1
116
Masterman R, Wheatle S. A Common law Resurgence in Rights Protection. European Human Rights Law Review 2015;1:57–65.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD718470ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E
117
Clayton R. The empire strikes back: common law rights and the Human Rights Act. Public Law 2015;:3–12.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I28D78E607B4611E4A15DE99780331015
118
Russell M. The contemporary House of Lords: Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2013.
119
Ballinger C. The House of Lords, 1911-2011: a century of non-reform. Oxford: : Hart 2012.
120
Melton J, Stuart C, Helen D. To Codify or not to Codify? https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/162.pdf
121
Blick A. Codifying – or not codifying – the UK constitution: A Literature Review. 2011.http://www.parliament.uk/pagefiles/56954/CPCS%20Literature%20Review%20(4).pdf
122
A New Magna Carta. 2014.http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/463/463.pdf
123
Walter J, Finey W, Walter W, et al. The times. Published Online First: 1788.http://0-infotrac.galegroup.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/itweb/warwick?db=TTDA
124
The guardian. Published Online First: 1980.http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1
125
The economist. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/41716
126
New statesman. Published Online First: 1996.http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1
127
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. Prospect: politics, essay, review. http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB
128
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. The spectator. Published Online First: 1994.http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB
129
Public law. Published Online First: 1956.http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I66580770A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
131
William S. Hein & Company. The law quarterly review. Published Online First: 1885.http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/lqr&collection=journals
132
The Law quarterly review. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1742833
133
JSTOR (Organization), William S. Hein & Company. The modern law review. Published Online First: 1937.http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2230
134
The Modern law review.
135
Cambridge University Law Society, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, et al. The Cambridge law journal. Published Online First: 1921.http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/jid_Clj
136
The Cambridge law journal. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1737980
137
Oxford journal of legal studies. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1743939
138
Society of Public Teachers of Law (London, England). Legal studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars.
139
Lee RG. Blackstone’s statutes on public law and human rights 2010-2011. Oxford: : Oxford University Press 2010.
140
Legislation.gov.uk. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga
141
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. http://www.bailii.org/
