[1]
Academy of Political Science (U.S.) 1972. Political science quarterly. 87, (1972).
[2]
ADLER, E. 1997. Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations. 3, 3 (Sep. 1997), 319–363. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003.
[3]
Adler, E. Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. European journal of international relations. 319–363.
[4]
Alan James 1989. The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies. 15, 3 (1989), 215–229.
[5]
Ashley, R.K. 1996. The achievements of post-structuralism. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[6]
Ashley, R.K. 1996. The achievements of post-structuralism. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. S. Smith et al., eds. Cambridge University Press.
[7]
Ashley, R.K. Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 227–262.
[8]
Ashley, R.K. 1988. Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 17, 2 (Jun. 1988), 227–262. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901.
[9]
Baldwin, D.A. Neorealism and neoliberalism : the contemporary debate / David A. Baldwin, editor.
[10]
Bartelson, J. 1995. A genealogy of sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
[11]
Bartelson, J. 1995. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge University Press.
[12]
Baylis, J. et al. 2011. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Baylis, J. et al. 2011. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[14]
Baylis, J. et al. 2011. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[15]
Baylis, J. et al. 2011. The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Beitz, C. 1998. International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought. World Politics. 51, (1998), 269–296.
[17]
Bellamy, A.J. 2005. International society and its critics. Oxford University Press.
[18]
Bellamy, A.J. 2005. International society and its critics. Oxford University Press.
[19]
Berger, P.L. and Luckmann, T. 1991. The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of  knowledge. Penguin.
[20]
Booth, K. 2011. Realism and world politics. Routledge.
[21]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Pennsylvania State University Press.
[22]
Booth, K. and Smith, S. 1995. International relations theory today. Polity Press.
[23]
Brown, C. 1992. International relations theory: new normative approaches. Columbia University Press.
[24]
Brown, C. 1995. International theory and international society: the viability of the middle way? Review of International Studies. 21, 02 (Apr. 1995). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
[25]
Brown, C. International theory and international society: the viability of the middle way. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 183–196.
[26]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[27]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[28]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[29]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[30]
Brown, C. and Ainley, K. 2009. Understanding international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[31]
Bull, H. et al. 2000. Hedley Bull on international society. Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
[32]
Bull, H. 2012. The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics. Palgrave Macmillan.
[33]
Bull, H. and Watson, A. 1984. The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.
[34]
Burchill, S. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[35]
Burchill, S. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[36]
Burchill, S. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[37]
Burchill, S. 2013. Theories of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[38]
Buzan, B. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press.
[39]
Buzan, B. et al. 1993. The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism. Columbia University Press.
[40]
Buzan, B. and Little, R. 2001. The ‘English patient’ strikes back: a response to Hall’s mis-diagnosis. International Affairs. 77, 4 (Oct. 2001), 943–946. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00227.
[41]
Buzan, B. and Little, R. ‘The "English patient” strikes back: a response to Hall’s mis-diagnosis’. International affairs. Cambridge University Press. 943–946.
[42]
Buzan, B. and Little, R. 2001. Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 30, 1 (Jan. 2001), 19–39. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.
[43]
Campbell, D. 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of  identity. Manchester University Press.
[44]
Campbell, D. 1998. Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of  identity. Manchester University Press.
[45]
Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M.J. 2007. Guest Editors’ Introduction. Security Dialogue. 38, 2 (Jun. 2007), 131–137. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607080596.
[46]
Campbell, D. and Shapiro, M.J. 1999. Moral spaces: rethinking ethics and world politics. University of Minnesota Press.
[47]
Carr, E.H. and Cox, M. 2001. The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[48]
Chekel, J. The constructivist turn in International Relations theory. World politics. 324–348.
[49]
Connolly, W.E. "Identity and Difference in Global Politics. International/intertextual relations : postmodern readings of world  politics / edited by James Der Derian, Michael J. Shapiro                        Advances in information systems and technologies [electronic resource] / Álvaro Rocha... [et al.] (eds.)                        Human-environment relations [electronic resource] : transformative values in theory and practice / Emily Brady, Pauline Phemister, editors.
[50]
Constantinou, C. Before the summit: representations of sovereignty on the Himalayas. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 23–54.
[51]
Constantinou, C.M. 1998. Before the Summit: Representations of Sovereignty on the Himalayas. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 27, 1 (Mar. 1998), 23–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270010901.
[52]
Copeland, D. 2003. A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies. 29, 03 (Jul. 2003). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004273.
[53]
Copeland., D.C. A realist critique of the English School. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 427–441.
[54]
Cox, R.W. 1997. The new realism: perspectives on multilateralism and world order. Macmillan.
[55]
Culler, J.D. 1983. On deconstruction: theory and criticism after structuralism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[56]
Cutler, A.C. The "Grotian tradition” in international relations’. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 41–65.
[57]
Der Derian, J. 1995. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[58]
Der Derian, J. 1995. International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
[59]
Der Derian, J. 1989. The boundaries of knowledge and power in international relations. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world  politics. Lexington Books.
[60]
Der Derian, J. and Shapiro, M.J. 1989. International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world  politics. Lexington Books.
[61]
Deudney, D. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies. 25, 179–196.
[62]
Deudney, D. The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of international studies. 25, 179–196.
[63]
Donnelly, J. 1992. Twentieth-Century Realism. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge studies in international relations, (1992), 84–111.
[64]
Doty, R.L. 1996. Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations. University of Minnesota Press.
[65]
Duncan Snidal 1991. Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation. The American Political Science Review. 701–726.
[66]
Dunne, T. 1998. The English School. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Palgrave Macmillan.
[67]
Dunne, T. and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford) 1998. Inventing international society: a history of the English school. Macmillan in association with St Antony’s College.
[68]
Edkins, J. et al. 1999. Sovereignty and subjectivity. L. Rienner.
[69]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. 2005. Generalising the International. Review of International Studies. 31, 3 (2005), 451–472. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
[70]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. Generalising the International. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 451–472.
[71]
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. 2013. Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[72]
Epp, R. The English school on the frontiers of international society: a hermeneutic recollection’. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 47–74.
[73]
Evans, T. and Wilson, P. Regime theory and the English school of international relations’. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 329–351.
[74]
Evans, T. and Wilson, P. 1992. Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 21, 3 (Dec. 1992), 329–351. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030701.
[75]
Fawn, R. and Larkins, J. 1996. International society after the Cold War: anarchy and order reconsidered. Macmillan Press.
[76]
Fierke, K.M. and Jørgensen, K.E. 2001. Constructing international relations: the next generation. M.E. Sharpe.
[77]
Finnemore, M. 1996. National interests in international society. Cornell University Press.
[78]
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. International Organization.
[79]
Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International organization.
[80]
Forde, S. 1992. Classical Realism. Traditions of international ethics. Cambridge studies in international relations, (1992), 62–84.
[81]
Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Penguin.
[82]
Foucault, M. and Gordon, C. 1980. Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
[83]
Foucault, M. and Rabinow, P. 1991. The Foucault reader. Penguin.
[84]
Fukuyama, Francis 151AD. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Foreign Affairs.
[85]
Gellman, P. 1988. Hans J. Morgenthau and the legacy of political realism - S0260210500113130a.pdf. Review of International Studies.
[86]
George, J. 1994. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[87]
George, J. 1994. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
[88]
George, J. 1994. The Positivist-Realist Phase: Morgenthau, Behavioralism, and the Quest for Certainty. Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations. Critical perspectives on world politics, (1994), 91–110.
[89]
Grieco, J. Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International organization. 42, 485–507.
[90]
Grieco, J.M. 1988. Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization. 42, 03 (Jun. 1988). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715.
[91]
Griffiths, M. 1995. Realism, idealism and international politics: a reinterpretation. Routledge.
[92]
Groom, A.J.R. and Light, M. 1994. Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Pinter Publishers.
[93]
Groom, A.J.R. and Light, M. 1994. Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Pinter Publishers.
[94]
Guzzini, S. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. ISTITUTO UNIV EUROPEOFrom OAIster®, provided by the OCLC Cooperative. 6, 2.
[95]
GUZZINI, S. 2000. A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 6, 2 (Jun. 2000), 147–182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001.
[96]
Guzzini, S. 1997. Realism in international relations and international political  economy: the continuing story of a death foretold. Routledge.
[97]
Hall, R.B. 1999. National collective identity: social constructs and international systems. Columbia University Press.
[98]
Hall, R.B. and Columbia University. Press 1999. National collective identity: social constructs and international systems. Columbia University Press.
[99]
Halliday, F. 1994. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[100]
Halliday, F. 1994. Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
[101]
Hoffman, S. 1987. Liberalism and International Affairs. Janus and Minerva: essaysin the theory and practice of international politics. Westview Press.
[102]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1990. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon.
[103]
Hollis, M. and Smith, S. 1991. Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.
[104]
Hovden, E. and Keene, E. 2001. Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’. The globalization of liberalism. (2001).
[105]
Hovden, E. and Keene, E. 2002. Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’. The globalization of liberalism. (2002).
[106]
Hurrell, A. 2007. On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society. Oxford University Press.
[107]
Hutchings, K. 1999. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. Sage Publications.
[108]
Hutchings, K. 1999. International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era. SAGE.
[109]
International Peace Research Institute 1992. Security dialogue. (1992).
[110]
J. Peter Burgess Security Dialogue. 35, 403–404.
[111]
Jack Snyder 1990. Averting Anarchy in the New Europe. International Security. 14, 4 (1990), 5–41.
[112]
Jackson, R.H. 2000. The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states. Oxford University Press.
[113]
James The realism of Realism: The state and the study of International Relations. Review of international studies. 215–229.
[114]
Jervis, R. 1988. Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation. World Politics. 317–349.
[115]
Jervis, R. Realism in the Study of International Politics. International organization. 52, 971–991.
[116]
Jervis, R. 1998. Realism in the Study of World Politics. International Organization. 52, 4 (Oct. 1998), 971–991. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550707.
[117]
John J. Mearsheimer 1990. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. 5–56.
[118]
Jones, R.E. 1981. The English school of international relations: a case for closure. Review of International Studies.
[119]
Jones, R.E. The English school of international relations: a case for closure. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 1–13.
[120]
Justin Rosenberg 1990. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies. 16, 4 (1990), 285–303.
[121]
Katzenstein, P.J. The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. Foreign affairs. Council on Foreign Relations. 123–124.
[122]
Keene, E. 2002. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Cambridge University Press.
[123]
Keene, E. 2002. Beyond the anarchical society: Grotius, colonialism and order in world politics. Cambridge University Press.
[124]
Kegley, C.W. ed. 2002. Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
[125]
Kenneth N. Waltz 1993. The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security. 44–79.
[126]
Keohane, R. 1990. International Liberalism Reconsidered. Cambridge University Press.
[127]
Keohane, R.O. 2005. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
[128]
Keohane, R.O. 2005. After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton University Press.
[129]
Keohane, R.O. 1989. International institutions and state power: essays in international  relations theory. Westview Press.
[130]
Keohane, R.O. 1986. Neorealism and its critics. Columbia University Press.
[131]
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. 2012. Power and interdependence. Longman.
[132]
Krasner, S.D. 1999. Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
[133]
Kratochwil, friedrich Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s "Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 73–101.
[134]
Kratochwil, F. 2000. Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s `Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 29, 1 (Jan. 2000), 73–101. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290010901.
[135]
Kratochwil, F. 1993. The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of International Studies. 19, 01 (Jan. 1993). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117346.
[136]
Kratochwil, F. The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of international studies. 19, 63–80.
[137]
Kratochwil, F.V. 1989. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
[138]
Kratochwil, F.V. 1989. Rules, norms and decisions: on the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs. Cambridge University Press.
[139]
Kubálková, V. et al. 1998. International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe.
[140]
Kuhn, T.S. and Hacking, I. 2012. The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press.
[141]
Lapid, Y. The Third Debate. On the Prospect of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International studies quarterly. Blackwell. 235–254.
[142]
Linklater, A. 1995. Neo-realism in Theory and Practice. International relations theory today. Pennsylvania State University Press. 241–262.
[143]
Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. 2006. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
[144]
Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. 2006. The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
[145]
Little, R. 2003. The English School vs. American Realism: a meeting of minds or divided by a common language? Review of International Studies. 29, 03 (Jul. 2003). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004431.
[146]
Little, R. The English School vs American Realism: a meeting of minds or divided by a common language. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 443–460.
[147]
LITTLE, R. 2000. The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations. 6, 3 (Sep. 2000), 395–422. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.
[148]
Little, R. The English School’s contribution to the study of International Relations’. European journal of international relations. Sage Publications. 395–422.
[149]
London School of Economics and Political Science. 1987. Millennium : journal of international studies. Millennium Journal of international studies. 16, 2 (1987).
[150]
M. Nicholson "What’s the use of International Relations”. Review of International Studies. 26, 2, 183–198.
[151]
Mearsheimer, J.J. Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. International Security. Center for Science and International Affairs. 5–56.
[152]
Mearsheimer, J.J. 2001. The tragedy of Great Power politics. Norton.
[153]
Michael J. Smith Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Political Traditions in Foreign Policy Series). Louisiana State Univ Pr.
[154]
Milner, H. 1992. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics. 44, 03 (Apr. 1992), 466–496. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
[155]
Milner, H. International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World politics. 466–494.
[156]
Mingst, K.A. and Snyder, J.L. 2011. Essential readings in world politics. W.W. Norton.
[157]
Mingst, K.A. and Snyder, J.L. 2011. Essential readings in world politics. W.W. Norton.
[158]
Mingst, K.A. and Snyder, J.L. 2011. Essential readings in world politics. W.W. Norton.
[159]
Mingst, K.A. and Snyder, J.L. 2011. Essential readings in world politics. W.W. Norton.
[160]
Morgenthau, H.J. et al. 2006. Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
[161]
Morgenthau, H.J. 1995. The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory. International theory: critical investigations. (1995), 53–71.
[162]
Neufeld, M. 1995. The restructuring of international relations theory. Cambridge University Press.
[163]
Neumann, I.B. 1997. John Vincent and the English School in International Relations. The Future of international relations: masters in the making?. Routledge.
[164]
Nye, J. 1988. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World politics. 40, (1988), 235–251.
[165]
Nye, J.S. 1988. Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics. 40, 02 (Jan. 1988), 235–251. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.
[166]
Palan, R. A world of their making: an evaluation of the constructivist critique in International Relations. Review of International Studies. 575–598.
[167]
Palan, R. A world of their making: an evaluation of the constructivist critique in International Relations. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 575–598.
[168]
R. B. J. Walker 1987. Realism, Change, and International Political Theory. International Studies Quarterly. 31, 1 (1987), 65–86.
[169]
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker 1990. Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly. 34, 3 (1990), 259–268.
[170]
Robert Jervis 1988. Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation. World Politics. 40, 3 (1988), 317–349.
[171]
Rosenau, J.N. and Durfee, M. 2000. Thinking theory thoroughly: coherent approaches to an incoherent world. Westview Press.
[172]
Rosenau, J.N. and Durfee, M. 2000. Thinking theory thoroughly: coherent approaches to an incoherent world. Westview Press.
[173]
Rosenau, J.N. and Durfee, M. 2000. Thinking theory thoroughly: coherent approaches to an incoherent world. Westview Press.
[174]
Rosenberg, J. 1990. What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of international studies. 16, (1990), 285–303.
[175]
Rothstein, R.L. 2006. On the costs of realism. Perspectives on world politics. (2006).
[176]
Rothstein, R.L. 2006. On the costs of realism. Perspectives on world politics. (2006).
[177]
Royal Institute of International Affairs. 2000. International affairs. 76, 4 (2000).
[178]
Ruggie, J.G. 1998. Constructing the world polity: essays on international  institutionalization. Routledge.
[179]
Sachs, W. 1993. Global ecology: a new arena of political conflict. Zed Books.
[180]
Said, E.W. 2003. Orientalism. Penguin.
[181]
Searle, J.R. 1996. The construction of social reality. Penguin.
[182]
Shapiro, M. 2013. How does the nation-state work? Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[183]
Shapiro, M. 2013. How does the nation-state work? Global politics: a new introduction. Routledge.
[184]
Shapiro, M.J. 1998. The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 27, 3 (Sep. 1998), 695–713. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030501.
[185]
Shapiro, M.J. The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 695–713.
[186]
Shapiro, M.J. and Alker, H.R. 1996. Challenging boundaries: global flows, territorial identities. University of Minnesota Press.
[187]
Smith, S. et al. 1996. International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
[188]
Snyder, J. Averting Anarchy in the New Europe. International Security. 14, 5–41.
[189]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[190]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[191]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[192]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[193]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[194]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[195]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[196]
Steans, J. et al. 2005. Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
[197]
Steans, J. and Steans, J. 2010. An introduction to international relations theory: perspectives and themes. Longman.
[198]
Suganami, H. 1983. The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations. International Relations. 2363–2381.
[199]
Vincent, R.J. 1988. Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 195–213.
[200]
Vincent, R.J. Hedley Bull and order in international politics. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 195–213.
[201]
Vogler, J. et al. 1996. The environment and international relations. Routledge.
[202]
Walker, R.B.J. 1993. Inside/outside: international relations as political theory. Cambridge University Press.
[203]
Walker, R.B.J. 1987. Realism, Change and International Political Theory. International studies quarterly. 31, 1 (1987), 65–86.
[204]
Walker, R.B.J. 1991. State Sovereignty and the Articulation of Political Space/Time. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 20, 3 (Mar. 1991), 445–461. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200030201.
[205]
Walker, R.B.J. and Ashley, R. Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International studies quarterly. Blackwell. 259–268.
[206]
Walt, S.M. 1987. The origins of alliances. Cornell University Press.
[207]
Waltz, Kenneth N. Realist thought and neorealist theory. Journal of International Affairs. 44, 1, 21–37.
[208]
Waltz, K.N. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
[209]
Waltz, K.N. 2001. Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
[210]
Waltz, K.N. Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory. Journal of international affairs. School of International Affairs, Columbia University. 21–37.
[211]
Waltz, K.N. 2000. Structural Realism after the Cold War. International Security. 5–41.
[212]
Waltz, K.N. Structural Realism After the Cold War. International Security. Center for Science and International Affairs. 5–41.
[213]
Waltz, K.N. The Emerging Structure of International Politics. International Security. Center for Science and International Affairs. 44–79.
[214]
Waltz, K.N. 2010. Theory of international politics. Waveland.
[215]
Waltz, K.N. 2010. Theory of international politics. Waveland.
[216]
Watson, A. 1987. Hedley Bull, states systems and international societies. Review of International Studies. 147–153.
[217]
Watson, A. 1992. The evolution of international society: a comparative historical  analysis. Routledge.
[218]
Weber, C. 1998. Performative States. Millennium - Journal of International Studies. 27, 1 (Mar. 1998), 77–95. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270011101.
[219]
Weber, C. Performative States. Millennium: journal of international studies. London School of Economics. 77–96.
[220]
Weber, C. Reconsidering statehood: examining the sovereignty/intervention boundary. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 199–216.
[221]
Weber, C. 1995. Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state, and symbolic  exchange. Cambridge University Press.
[222]
Weber, C. 1994. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge University Press.
[223]
Weldes, J. 1999. Constructing national interests: the United States and the Cuban  missile crisis. University of Minnesota Press.
[224]
Weldes, J. 1999. Constructing national interests: the United States and the Cuban missile crisis. University of Minnesota Press.
[225]
Wendt, A. 1999. Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
[226]
Wheeler, N.J. and Dunne, T. Hedley Bull’s pluralism of the intellect and solidarism of the will’. International affairs. Cambridge University Press. 91–107.
[227]
Wight, M. et al. 1991. International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of  International Affairs.
[228]
Wight, M. et al. 1986. Power politics. Penguin (for) Royal Institute of International  Affairs.
[229]
Wight, M. et al. 1977. Systems of states. Leicester University Press (for) the London School of  Economics and Political Science.
[230]
Williams, J. 2002. Territorial borders, toleration and the English School’. Review of International Studies. 737–758.
[231]
Williams, J. Territorial borders, toleration and the English School. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 737–758.
[232]
World Peace Foundation. International organization.
[233]
Yosef Lapid 1989. The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly. 33, 3 (1989), 235–254.
[234]
ZEHFUSS, M. 2001. Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations. 7, 3 (Sep. 2001), 315–348. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007003002.
[235]
Zehfuss, M. Constructivism and identity: A dangerous liaison. European journal of international relations. Sage Publications. 315–348.
[236]
Zehfuss, M. 2002. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge University Press.
[237]
Zehfuss, M. 2002. Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality. Cambridge University Press.
[238]
Zhang, Y. 151AD. The "English School” in China: a travelogue of ideas and their diffusion’. European Journal of International Relations. 87–114.
[239]
Zhang, Y. The "English School” in China: a travelogue of ideas and their diffusion. European journal of international relations. Sage Publications. 87–114.
[240]
Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. International Organization. 48, 2.
[241]
Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies. Review of international studies. Butterworths. 147–153.
[242]
1996. Hedley Bull’s pluralism of the intellect and solidarism of the will. International Affairs. (1996), 91–107.
[243]
Relative Gains and Patterns of International Cooperation. American political science review. 701–726.
[244]
2001. Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school. International Affairs. 77, 4 (2001), 931–942.
[245]
Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English School’. International affairs. Cambridge University Press. 931–942.
[246]
Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization. Cambridge University Press. 513–553.
[247]
The social construction of international society. European journal of international relations. Sage Publications. 367–389.