Academy of Political Science (U.S.). 1972. ‘Political Science Quarterly’ 87.
ADLER, E. 1997. ‘Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics’. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 319–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003.
Adler, E. n.d. ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’. In European Journal of International Relations., 3:319–63. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S15?/tEuropean+Journal+of+International+Relation/teuropean+journal+of+international+relation/1%2C1%2C2%2CB/frameset&FF=teuropean+journal+of+international+relations&1%2C%2C2.
Alan James. 1989. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 15 (3): 215–29. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20097183?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. n.d. International Organization 48 (2). http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/inteorga.
Ashley, R. K. 1988. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 227–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901.
Ashley, R.K. 1996a. ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1996b. ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.
———. n.d. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 17:227–62. London: London School of Economics.
Baldwin, D.A. n.d. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism : The Contemporary Debate / David A. Baldwin, Editor’. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SNeorealism%20and%20Neoliberalism%3A%20The%20Contemporary%20Debate__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt.
Bartelson, Jens. 1995a. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1995b. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511586385.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. 2011a. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011b. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011c. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2011d. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Beitz, Charles. 1998. ‘International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought’. World Politics 51: 269–96. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/worldpolitics.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2005a. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2005b. International Society and Its Critics. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Vol. Penguin social sciences. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Booth, Ken. 2011. Realism and World Politics. London: Routledge.
Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. 1995a. International Relations Theory Today. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
———. 1995b. International Relations Theory Today. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Brown, C. n.d. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way’. In Review of International Studies, 2nd ed., 21:183–96. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Brown, Chris. 1992. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1995. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009a. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2009b. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2009c. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2009d. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2009e. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley. 2012. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley, Kai Alderson, and Andrew Hurrell. 2000. Hedley Bull on International Society. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: Clarendon.
Burchill, Scott. 2013a. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013b. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013c. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
———. 2013d. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2001. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 30 (1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.
Buzan, B., and Richard Little. n.d. ‘‘The "English Patient” Strikes Back: A Response to Hall’s Mis-Diagnosis’’. In International Affairs, 77:943–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511616617.
Buzan, Barry, Charles A. Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. Vol. New directions in world politics. New York, N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2001. ‘The “English Patient” Strikes Back: A Response to Hall’s Mis-Diagnosis’. International Affairs 77 (4): 943–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00227.
Campbell, D., and M. J. Shapiro. 2007. ‘Guest Editors’ Introduction’. Security Dialogue 38 (2): 131–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607080596.
Campbell, David. 1998a. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
———. 1998b. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Campbell, David, and Michael J. Shapiro. 1999. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett, and Michael Cox. 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Chekel, Jeffrey. n.d. ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’. In World Politics, 50:324–48.
Connolly, William E. n.d. ‘"Identity and Difference in Global Politics’. International/Intertextual Relations : Postmodern Readings of World Politics / Edited by James Der Derian, Michael J. Shapiro Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Electronic Resource] / Álvaro Rocha... [et al.] (Eds.) Human-Environment Relations [Electronic Resource] : Transformative Values in Theory and Practice / Emily Brady, Pauline Phemister, Editors. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SInternationalLw%3D%3DIntertextual%20Relations__Orightresult?lang=eng&suite=cobalt.
Constantinou, C. n.d. ‘Before the Summit: Representations of Sovereignty on the Himalayas’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27:23–54. London: London School of Economics.
Constantinou, C. M. 1998. ‘Before the Summit: Representations of Sovereignty on the Himalayas’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 27 (1): 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270010901.
Copeland, Dale. 2003. ‘A Realist Critique of the English School’. Review of International Studies 29 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004273.
Copeland., Dale C. n.d. ‘A Realist Critique of the English School’. In Review of International Studies, 3rd ed., 29:427–41. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Cox, Robert W. 1997. The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. Vol. International political economy series. Multilareralism and the UN system. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Culler, Jonathan D. 1983. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Cutler, A.C. n.d. ‘The "Grotian Tradition” in International Relations’’. In Review of International Studies, 17:41–65. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Der Derian, J. 1989. ‘The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations’. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Der Derian, James. 1995a. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
———. 1995b. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Der Derian, James, and Michael J. Shapiro. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Deudney, Daniel. n.d. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review of International Studies 25: 179–96. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/revinterstud.
———. n.d. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review of International Studies. 25: 179–96. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/treview+of+international+studies/treview+of+international+studies/1%2C3%2C5%2CB/frameset&FF=treview+of+international+studies&2%2C%2C3/indexsort=-.
Donnelly, J. 1992. ‘Twentieth-Century Realism’. Traditions of International Ethics Cambridge studies in international relations: 84–111.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Vol. Borderlines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Duncan Snidal. 1991. ‘Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation’. In The American Political Science Review, 85:701–26. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1963847?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Dunne, Tim. 1998. ‘The English School’. Electronic resource. In Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230376137.
Dunne, Tim and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Vol. St. Antony’s series. Basingstoke: Macmillan in association with St Antony’s College.
Edkins, J., and M. Zehfuss. n.d. ‘Generalising the International’. In Review of International Studies, 31:451–72. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Edkins, Jenny, Nalini Persram, and Véronique Pin-Fat. 1999. Sovereignty and Subjectivity. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder: L. Rienner.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. 2005. ‘Generalising the International’. Review of International Studies 31 (3): 451–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
———. 2013. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=514135&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Epp, R. n.d. ‘The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection’’. In Review of International Studies, 24:47–74. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Evans, T., and P. Wilson. 1992. ‘Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 21 (3): 329–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030701.
Evans, T., and Peter Wilson. n.d. ‘Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations’’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21:329–51. London: London School of Economics.
Fawn, Rick, and Jeremy Larkins. 1996. International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Macmillan Press.
Fierke, K. M., and Knud Erik Jørgensen. 2001. Constructing International Relations: The next Generation. Vol. International relations in a constructed world. Armonk, N.Y.: M.E. Sharpe.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. n.d. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’’. In International Organization. Vol. 52. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=173304&jid=INO&volumeId=52&issueId=04&aid=173303&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=.
———. n.d. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. In International Organization. Vol. 52.
Forde, S. 1992. ‘Classical Realism’. Traditions of International Ethics Cambridge studies in international relations: 62–84.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, Michel, and Colin Gordon. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. 1991. The Foucault Reader. London: Penguin.
Fukuyama, Francis. 151AD. ‘The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics’. In Foreign Affairs. Vol. 76. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/214267072/fulltext/BC6E5648BEA0478APQ/15?accountid=14888.
Gellman, P. 1988. ‘Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism - S0260210500113130a.Pdf’. Review of International Studies. https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/media/pdf/cup/archive/RIS14_04/S0260210500113130a.pdf.
George, Jim. 1994a. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
———. 1994b. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Boulder, Colorado: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
———. 1994c. ‘The Positivist-Realist Phase: Morgenthau, Behavioralism, and the Quest for Certainty’. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations Critical perspectives on world politics: 91–110.
Grieco, J. n.d. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42: 485–507.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715.
Griffiths, Martin. 1995. Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. London: Routledge.
Groom, A. J. R., and Margot Light. 1994a. Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
———. 1994b. Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.
GUZZINI, S. 2000. ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 147–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001.
Guzzini, S. n.d. ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’. ISTITUTO UNIV EUROPEOFrom OAIster®, Provided by the OCLC Cooperative 6 (2). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsoai&AN=edsoai.828912677&site=eds-live&group=trial.
Guzzini, Stefano. 1997. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge.
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. New York: Columbia University Press.
Hall, Rodney Bruce and Columbia University. Press. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. Electronic resource. New York: Columbia University Press.
Halliday, Fred. 1994a. Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
———. 1994b. Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
‘Hedley Bull, State Systems and International Societies’. n.d. In Review of International Studies, 2nd ed., 13:147–53. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
‘Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will.’ 1996. International Affairs, 91–107. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9602271958&site=eds-live&group=trial.
Hoffman, Stanley. 1987. ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’. In Janus and Minerva: Essaysin the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon.
———. 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Oxford [England]: Clarendon Press.
Hovden, Eivind, and Edward Keene. 2001. ‘Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’’. Electronic resource. The Globalization of Liberalism. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230519381.
———. 2002. ‘Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’’. The Globalization of Liberalism.
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233106.001.0001.
Hutchings, Kimberly. 1999a. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Vol. Sage politics texts. London: Sage Publications. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255970&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 1999b. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Vol. Sage politics texts. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE.
International Peace Research Institute. 1992. ‘Security Dialogue’. Electronic resource. http://0-sdi.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/.
J. Peter Burgess. n.d. ‘Security Dialogue’ 35: 403–4. http://0-sdi.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/35/4.toc.
Jack Snyder. 1990. ‘Averting Anarchy in the New Europe’. International Security 14 (4): 5–41. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2538749?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199262012.001.0001.
James. n.d. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies, 215–29.
Jervis, R. n.d. ‘Realism in the Study of International Politics’. International Organization 52: 971–91.
Jervis, Robert. 1988. ‘Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation’. In World Politics, 40:317–49. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010216.
———. 1998. ‘Realism in the Study of World Politics’. International Organization 52 (4): 971–91. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550707.
John J. Mearsheimer. 1990. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. In International Security, 15:5–56. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2538981?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Jones, R.E. n.d. ‘The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure’. In Review of International Studies, 1st ed., 7:1–13. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Jones, Roy E. 1981. ‘The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure’. In Review of International Studies, 1st ed. Vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500115086.
Justin Rosenberg. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16 (4): 285–303. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20097232?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Katzenstein, P.J. n.d. ‘The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics’. In Foreign Affairs, 76:123–24. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.
Keene, Edward. 2002a. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Vol. LSE Monographs in International Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491474.
———. 2002b. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. Vol. LSE monographs in international studies. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Kegley, Charles W., ed. 2002. Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenneth N. Waltz. 1993. ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’. In International Security, 18:44–79. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2539097?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Keohane, Robert. 1990. International Liberalism Reconsidered. The Economic Limits to Modern Politics. Vol. Murphy Institute studies in political economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. Vol. The Political economy of international change. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Boulder: Westview Press.
———. 2005a. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Electronic resource. 1st Princeton classic ed. Vol. A Princeton classic edition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=275144&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005b. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. 1st Princeton classic ed. Vol. A Princeton classic edition. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 2012. Power and Interdependence. 4th ed. Boston: Longman.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Kratochwil, F. 2000. ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s `Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 29 (1): 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290010901.
———. n.d. ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics’. Review of International Studies 19: 63–80.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1993. ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics’. Review of International Studies 19 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117346.
Kratochwil, friedrich. n.d. ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s "Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29:73–101. London: London School of Economics.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989a. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511559044.
———. 1989b. Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kubálková, V., Nicholas Greenwood Onuf, and Paul Kowert. 1998. International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk, N.Y.aLondon: M.E. Sharpe.
Kuhn, Thomas S., and Ian Hacking. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Fourth edition. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Lapid, Y. n.d. ‘The Third Debate. On the Prospect of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’. In International Studies Quarterly, 33:235–54. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Linklater, A. 1995. ‘Neo-Realism in Theory and Practice’. In International Relations Theory Today, 241–62. University Park, Pa: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006a. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491528.
———. 2006b. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LITTLE, R. 2000. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6 (3): 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.
Little, R. n.d. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’’. In European Journal of International Relations, 6:395–422. London: Sage Publications.
Little, Richard. 2003. ‘The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?’ Review of International Studies 29 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004431.
———. n.d. ‘The English School vs American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language’. In Review of International Studies, 3rd ed., 29:443–60. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
London School of Economics and Political Science. 1987. ‘Millennium : Journal of International Studies.
Millennium
Journal of International Studies’ 16 (2).
M. Nicholson. n.d. ‘"What’s the Use of International Relations”’. Review of International Studies 26 (2): 183–98. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1600244~S1.
Mearsheimer, J.J. n.d. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. In International Security, 15:5–56. Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. Vol. The Norton series in world poltics. New York: Norton.
Michael J. Smith. n.d. Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Political Traditions in Foreign Policy Series). Paperback. Louisiana State Univ Pr.
Milner, H. n.d. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. In World Politics, 44:466–94.
Milner, Helen. 1992. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. World Politics 44 (03): 466–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
Mingst, Karen A., and Jack L. Snyder. 2011a. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. Vol. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
———. 2011b. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. Vol. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
———. 2011c. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. Vol. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
———. 2011d. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. Vol. The Norton series in world politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Morgenthau, Hans J., Kenneth W. Thompson, and W. David Clinton. 2006. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, H.J. 1995. ‘The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory’. International Theory: Critical Investigations, 53–71.
Neufeld, Mark. 1995. The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Neumann, I.B. 1997. ‘John Vincent and the English School in International Relations’. In The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making? Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge.
Nye, J. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40: 235–51.
Nye, Joseph S. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40 (02): 235–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.
Palan, R. n.d. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. In Review of International Studies, 26:575–98. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=62978&jid=RIS&volumeId=26&issueId=04&aid=62977&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=.
———. n.d. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. In Review of International Studies, 26:575–98. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
R. B. J. Walker. 1987. ‘Realism, Change, and International Political Theory’. International Studies Quarterly 31 (1): 65–86. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600660?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
‘Relative Gains and Patterns of International Cooperation’. n.d. In American Political Science Review, 3rd ed., 85:701–26.
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. 1990. ‘Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies’. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 259–68. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600569?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Robert Jervis. 1988. ‘Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation’. World Politics 40 (3): 317–49. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2010216?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Rosenau, James N., and Mary Durfee. 2000a. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
———. 2000b. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
———. 2000c. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. 2nd ed. Boulder, Colo: Westview Press.
Rosenberg, J. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16: 285–303.
Rothstein, R.L. 2006a. ‘On the Costs of Realism’. Perspectives on World Politics.
———. 2006b. ‘On the Costs of Realism’. Electronic resource. Perspectives on World Politics. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=29166&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Royal Institute of International Affairs. 2000. ‘International Affairs.’ 76 (4).
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. Vol. The new international relations. London: Routledge.
Sachs, Wolfgang. 1993. Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict. London: Zed Books.
Said, Edward W. 2003. Orientalism. [New pref. ed.]. Vol. Penguin classics. London: Penguin.
Searle, John R. 1996. The Construction of Social Reality. London: Penguin.
Shapiro, M. J. 1998. ‘The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 27 (3): 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030501.
Shapiro, Michael J., and Hayward R. Alker. 1996. Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Vol. Borderlines. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Shapiro, Mike. 2013a. ‘How Does the Nation-State Work?’ In Global Politics: A New Introduction, Second edition. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=514135&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2013b. ‘How Does the Nation-State Work?’ In Global Politics: A New Introduction, Second edition. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Shapiro, M.J. n.d. ‘The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27:695–713. London: London School of Economics.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, J. n.d. ‘Averting Anarchy in the New Europe’. International Security 14: 5–41.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005a. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005b. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
———. 2005c. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005d. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005e. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005f. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
———. 2005g. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. Electronic resource. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
———. 2005h. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Harlow, England: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Steans, Jill, and Jill Steans. 2010. An Introduction to International Relations Theory: Perspectives and Themes. 3rd ed. Harlow: Longman.
‘Still the English Patient? Closures and Inventions in the English School.’ 2001. International Affairs 77 (4): 931–42. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5408273&site=eds-live&group=trial.
‘Still the English Patient? Closures and Inventions in the English School’’. n.d. In International Affairs, 77:931–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Suganami, H. 1983. ‘The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations’. In International Relations, 7:2363–81. https://doi.org/10.1177/004711788300700508.
‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’. n.d. In International Organization, 51:513–53. Cambridge University Press. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/inteorga.
‘The Social Construction of International Society’. n.d. In European Journal of International Relations, 3rd ed., 1:367–89. London: Sage Publications.
Vincent, R.J. 1988. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. In Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 2nd ed., 17:195–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701.
———. n.d. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2nd ed., 17:195–213. London: London School of Economics.
Vogler, John, Mark F. Imber, and ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme. 1996. The Environment and International Relations. Vol. Global environmental change series. London: Routledge.
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, R.B.J. 1987. ‘Realism, Change and International Political Theory’. International Studies Quarterly 31 (1): 65–86.
———. 1991. ‘State Sovereignty and the Articulation of Political Space/Time’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 20 (3): 445–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200030201.
Walker, R.B.J., and Richard Ashley. n.d. ‘Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies’. In International Studies Quarterly, 34:259–68. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Vol. Cornell studies in security affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. In International Security, 25:5–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560372.
———. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press.
———. 2010a. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland.
———. 2010b. Theory of International Politics. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland.
———. n.d. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New York: Columbia University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=909467.
Waltz, Kenneth N. n.d. ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory.’ Journal of International Affairs 44 (1): 21–37. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9609193524&site=eds-live&group=trial.
Waltz, K.N. n.d. ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory’. In Journal of International Affairs, 44:21–37. New York: School of International Affairs, Columbia University.
———. n.d. ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War’. In International Security, 25:5–41. Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs.
———. n.d. ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’. In International Security, 18:44–79. Cambridge, MA: Center for Science and International Affairs.
Watson, Adam. 1987. ‘Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Societies’. In Review of International Studies, 2nd ed., 13:147–53. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113701.
———. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. London: Routledge.
Weber, C. 1998. ‘Performative States’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 27 (1): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270011101.
———. n.d. ‘Performative States’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27:77–96. London: London School of Economics.
———. n.d. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. In Review of International Studies, 18:199–216. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
Weber, Cynthia. 1994. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511559167.
———. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State, and Symbolic Exchange. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weldes, Jutta. 1999a. Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Vol. Borderlines (Minneapolis, Minn.). Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 1999b. Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Electronic resource. Vol. Borderlines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310458.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wheeler, N.J., and T. Dunne. n.d. ‘Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will’’. In International Affairs, 72:91–107. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wight, Martin, Hedley Bull, Carsten Holbraad, and Royal Institute of International Affairs. 1986. Power Politics. 2nd ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin (for) Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Wight, Martin, Hedley Bull, and London School of Economics and Political Science. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester: Leicester University Press (for) the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Wight, Martin, Gabriele Wight, Brian Porter, and Royal Institute of International Affairs. 1991. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester: Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Williams, J. 2002. ‘Territorial Borders, Toleration and the English School’’. In Review of International Studies, 28:737–58. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/204944767?accountid=14888.
———. n.d. ‘Territorial Borders, Toleration and the English School’. In Review of International Studies, 28:737–58. Sevenoaks: Butterworths.
World Peace Foundation. n.d. ‘International Organization.’ http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/tinternational+organization/tinternational+organization/1%2C49%2C76%2CB/frameset&FF=tinternational+organization&2%2C%2C7/indexsort=-.
Yosef Lapid. 1989. ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 235–54. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600457?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
ZEHFUSS, M. 2001. ‘Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison’. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 315–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007003002.
Zehfuss, M. n.d. ‘Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison’. In European Journal of International Relations, 7:315–48. London: Sage Publications.
Zehfuss, Maja. 2002a. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491795.
———. 2002b. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Y. n.d. ‘The "English School” in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and Their Diffusion’. In European Journal of International Relations, 9:87–114. London: Sage Publications.
Zhang, Yongjin. 151AD. ‘The "English School” in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and Their Diffusion’’. In European Journal of International Relations, 9:87–114. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/211999072/fulltextPDF?accountid=14888.
