Academy of Political Science (U.S.). 1972. Political Science Quarterly. 3rd edn. 87.
ADLER, E. 1997. ‘Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics’. European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 319–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003.
Adler, E. n.d. ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’. In European Journal of International Relations., vol. 3. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S15?/tEuropean+Journal+of+International+Relation/teuropean+journal+of+international+relation/1%2C1%2C2%2CB/frameset&FF=teuropean+journal+of+international+relations&1%2C%2C2.
Alan James. 1989. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies 15 (3): 215–29. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20097183?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’. n.d. International Organization 48 (2). http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/inteorga.
Ashley, R. K. 1988. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 17 (2): 227–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901.
Ashley, R.K. 1996a. ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.
Ashley, R.K. 1996b. ‘The Achievements of Post-Structuralism’. In International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, edited by Steve Smith, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511660054.
Ashley, R.K. n.d. ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 17. no. 2. London School of Economics.
Baldwin, D.A. n.d. Neorealism and Neoliberalism : The Contemporary Debate / David A. Baldwin, Editor. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SNeorealism%20and%20Neoliberalism%3A%20The%20Contemporary%20Debate__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt.
Bartelson, Jens. 1995a. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Bartelson, Jens. 1995b. A Genealogy of Sovereignty. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511586385.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. 2011a. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. 2011b. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. 2011c. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.
Baylis, John, Steve Smith, and Patricia Owens. 2011d. The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations. 5th ed. Oxford University Press.
Beitz, Charles. 1998. ‘International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought’. World Politics 51: 269–96. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/worldpolitics.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2005a. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, Alex J. 2005b. International Society and Its Critics. Oxford University Press. Electronic resource. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001.
Berger, Peter L., and Thomas Luckmann. 1991. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. Penguin social sciences. Penguin.
Booth, Ken. 2011. Realism and World Politics. Routledge.
Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. 1995a. International Relations Theory Today. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Booth, Ken, and Steve Smith. 1995b. International Relations Theory Today. Polity Press.
Brown, C. n.d. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way’. In Review of International Studies, 2nd edn, vol. 21. Butterworths.
Brown, Chris. 1992. International Relations Theory: New Normative Approaches. Columbia University Press.
Brown, Chris. 1995. ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’ Review of International Studies 21 (02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009a. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009b. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009c. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009d. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, Chris, and Kirsten Ainley. 2009e. Understanding International Relations. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley. 2012. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 4th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley, Kai Alderson, and Andrew Hurrell. 2000. Hedley Bull on International Society. Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
Bull, Hedley, and Adam Watson. 1984. The Expansion of International Society. Clarendon.
Burchill, Scott. 2013a. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill, Scott. 2013b. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill, Scott. 2013c. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill, Scott. 2013d. Theories of International Relations. 5th ed. Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan, B., and R. Little. 2001. ‘Why International Relations Has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to Do About It’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 30 (1): 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401.
Buzan, B., and Richard Little. n.d. ‘‘The "English Patient” Strikes Back: A Response to Hall’s Mis-Diagnosis’’. In International Affairs, vol. 77. no. 4. Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, Barry. 2004. From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511616617.
Buzan, Barry, Charles A. Jones, and Richard Little. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Buzan, Barry, and Richard Little. 2001. ‘The “English Patient” Strikes Back: A Response to Hall’s Mis-Diagnosis’. International Affairs 77 (4): 943–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00227.
Campbell, D., and M. J. Shapiro. 2007. ‘Guest Editors’ Introduction’. Security Dialogue 38 (2): 131–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607080596.
Campbell, David. 1998a. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Manchester University Press.
Campbell, David. 1998b. Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity. Rev. ed. Manchester University Press.
Campbell, David, and Michael J. Shapiro. 1999. Moral Spaces: Rethinking Ethics and World Politics. University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, Edward Hallett, and Michael Cox. 2001. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chekel, Jeffrey. n.d. ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’. In World Politics, vol. 50. no. 2.
Connolly, William E. n.d. ‘"Identity and Difference in Global Politics’. International/Intertextual Relations : Postmodern Readings of World Politics / Edited by James Der Derian, Michael J. Shapiro Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Electronic Resource] / Álvaro Rocha... [et al.] (Eds.) Human-Environment Relations [Electronic Resource] : Transformative Values in Theory and Practice / Emily Brady, Pauline Phemister, Editors. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SInternationalLw%3D%3DIntertextual%20Relations__Orightresult?lang=eng&suite=cobalt.
Constantinou, C. n.d. ‘Before the Summit: Representations of Sovereignty on the Himalayas’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 27. London School of Economics.
Constantinou, C. M. 1998. ‘Before the Summit: Representations of Sovereignty on the Himalayas’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 27 (1): 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270010901.
Copeland, Dale. 2003. ‘A Realist Critique of the English School’. Review of International Studies 29 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004273.
Copeland., Dale C. n.d. ‘A Realist Critique of the English School’. In Review of International Studies, 3rd edn, vol. 29. Butterworths.
Cox, Robert W. 1997. The New Realism: Perspectives on Multilateralism and World Order. International political economy series. Multilareralism and the UN system. Macmillan.
Culler, Jonathan D. 1983. On Deconstruction: Theory and Criticism after Structuralism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Cutler, A.C. n.d. ‘The "Grotian Tradition” in International Relations’’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 17. no. 1. Butterworths.
Der Derian, J. 1989. ‘The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations’. In International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics, Issues in world politics series. Lexington Books.
Der Derian, James. 1995a. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan.
Der Derian, James. 1995b. International Theory: Critical Investigations. Macmillan.
Der Derian, James, and Michael J. Shapiro. 1989. International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Issues in world politics series. Lexington Books.
Deudney, Daniel. n.d.-a. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review of International Studies 25: 179–96. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/revinterstud.
Deudney, Daniel. n.d.-b. ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’. Review of International Studies. 25: 179–96. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/treview+of+international+studies/treview+of+international+studies/1%2C3%2C5%2CB/frameset&FF=treview+of+international+studies&2%2C%2C3/indexsort=-.
Donnelly, J. 1992. ‘Twentieth-Century Realism’. Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge) Cambridge studies in international relations: 84–111.
Doty, Roxanne Lynn. 1996. Imperial Encounters: The Politics of Representation in North-South Relations. Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press.
Duncan Snidal. 1991. ‘Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation’. In The American Political Science Review, vol. 85. no. 3. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1963847?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Dunne, Tim. 1998. ‘The English School’. In Inventing International Society: A History of the English School, St. Antony’s series. Palgrave Macmillan. Electronic resource. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230376137.
Dunne, Tim and St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). 1998. Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. St. Antony’s series. Macmillan in association with St Antony’s College.
Edkins, J., and M. Zehfuss. n.d. ‘Generalising the International’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 31. no. 3. Butterworths.
Edkins, Jenny, Nalini Persram, and Véronique Pin-Fat. 1999. Sovereignty and Subjectivity. Critical perspectives on world politics. L. Rienner.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. 2005. ‘Generalising the International’. Review of International Studies 31 (3): 451–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
Edkins, Jenny, and Maja Zehfuss. 2013. Global Politics: A New Introduction. Second edition. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=514135&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Epp, R. n.d. ‘The English School on the Frontiers of International Society: A Hermeneutic Recollection’’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 24. no. 5. Butterworths.
Evans, T., and P. Wilson. 1992. ‘Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 21 (3): 329–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030701.
Evans, T., and Peter Wilson. n.d. ‘Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations’’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 21. no. 3. London School of Economics.
Fawn, Rick, and Jeremy Larkins. 1996. International Society after the Cold War: Anarchy and Order Reconsidered. Macmillan Press.
Fierke, K. M., and Knud Erik Jørgensen. 2001. Constructing International Relations: The next Generation. International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe.
Finnemore, Martha. 1996. National Interests in International Society. Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. n.d.-a. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’’. In International Organization, vol. 52. no. 4. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=173304&jid=INO&volumeId=52&issueId=04&aid=173303&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=.
Finnemore, Martha, and Kathryn Sikkink. n.d.-b. ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. In International Organization, vol. 52. no. 4.
Forde, S. 1992. ‘Classical Realism’. Traditions of International Ethics (Cambridge) Cambridge studies in international relations: 62–84.
Foucault, Michel. 1991. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Penguin.
Foucault, Michel, and Colin Gordon. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, Michel, and Paul Rabinow. 1991. The Foucault Reader. Penguin.
Fukuyama, Francis. 151 AD. ‘The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics’. In Foreign Affairs, vol. 76. no. 3. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/214267072/fulltext/BC6E5648BEA0478APQ/15?accountid=14888.
Gellman, P. 1988. ‘Hans J. Morgenthau and the Legacy of Political Realism - S0260210500113130a.Pdf’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 14. https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/media/pdf/cup/archive/RIS14_04/S0260210500113130a.pdf.
George, Jim. 1994a. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
George, Jim. 1994b. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
George, Jim. 1994c. ‘The Positivist-Realist Phase: Morgenthau, Behavioralism, and the Quest for Certainty’. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations (Boulder, Colorado) Critical perspectives on world politics: 91–110.
Grieco, J. n.d. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42: 485–507.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’. International Organization 42 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715.
Griffiths, Martin. 1995. Realism, Idealism and International Politics: A Reinterpretation. Routledge.
Groom, A. J. R., and Margot Light. 1994a. Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. Pinter Publishers.
Groom, A. J. R., and Margot Light. 1994b. Contemporary International Relations: A Guide to Theory. Pinter Publishers.
GUZZINI, S. 2000. ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6 (2): 147–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001.
Guzzini, S. n.d. ‘A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations’. ISTITUTO UNIV EUROPEOFrom OAIster®, Provided by the OCLC Cooperative 6 (2). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsoai&AN=edsoai.828912677&site=eds-live&group=trial.
Guzzini, Stefano. 1997. Realism in International Relations and International Political Economy: The Continuing Story of a Death Foretold. The new international relations. Routledge.
Hall, Rodney Bruce. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. Columbia University Press.
Hall, Rodney Bruce and Columbia University. Press. 1999. National Collective Identity: Social Constructs and International Systems. Columbia University Press. Electronic resource.
Halliday, Fred. 1994a. Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan.
Halliday, Fred. 1994b. Rethinking International Relations. Macmillan.
‘Hedley Bull, State Systems and International Societies’. n.d. In Review of International Studies, 2nd edn, vol. 13. Butterworths.
‘Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will.’ 1996. International Affairs, 91–107. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9602271958&site=eds-live&group=trial.
Hoffman, Stanley. 1987. ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’. In Janus and Minerva: Essaysin the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Westview Press.
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. 1990. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Clarendon.
Hollis, Martin, and Steve Smith. 1991. Explaining and Understanding International Relations. Clarendon Press.
Hovden, Eivind, and Edward Keene. 2001. ‘Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’’. The Globalization of Liberalism (Basingstoke). Electronic resource. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230519381.
Hovden, Eivind, and Edward Keene. 2002. ‘Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’’. The Globalization of Liberalism (Basingstoke).
Hurrell, Andrew. 2007. On Global Order: Power, Values, and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford University Press. Electronic resource. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233106.001.0001.
Hutchings, Kimberly. 1999a. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Sage politics texts. Sage Publications. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255970&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Hutchings, Kimberly. 1999b. International Political Theory: Rethinking Ethics in a Global Era. Sage politics texts. SAGE.
International Peace Research Institute. 1992. Security Dialogue. (London). Electronic resource. http://0-sdi.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/.
J. Peter Burgess. n.d. Security Dialogue. 35: 403–4. http://0-sdi.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/35/4.toc.
Jack Snyder. 1990. ‘Averting Anarchy in the New Europe’. International Security 14 (4): 5–41. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2538749?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Jackson, Robert H. 2000. The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford University Press. Electronic resource. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199262012.001.0001.
James. n.d. ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’. Review of International Studies (Sevenoaks), 215–29.
Jervis, R. n.d. ‘Realism in the Study of International Politics’. International Organization 52: 971–91.
Jervis, Robert. 1988. ‘Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation’. In World Politics, vol. 40. no. 03. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010216.
Jervis, Robert. 1998. ‘Realism in the Study of World Politics’. International Organization 52 (4): 971–91. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550707.
John J. Mearsheimer. 1990. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. In International Security, vol. 15. no. 1. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2538981?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Jones, R.E. n.d. ‘The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure’. In Review of International Studies, 1st edn, vol. 7. Butterworths.
Jones, Roy E. 1981. ‘The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure’. In Review of International Studies, 1st edn, vol. 7. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500115086.
Justin Rosenberg. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies 16 (4): 285–303. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20097232?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Katzenstein, P.J. n.d. ‘The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics’. In Foreign Affairs, vol. 76. no. 3. Council on Foreign Relations.
Keene, Edward. 2002a. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. LSE Monographs in International Studies. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491474.
Keene, Edward. 2002b. Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics. LSE monographs in international studies. Cambridge University Press.
Kegley, Charles W., ed. 2002. Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neoliberal Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenneth N. Waltz. 1993. ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’. In International Security, vol. 18. no. 2. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2539097?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Keohane, Robert. 1990. International Liberalism Reconsidered. In The Economic Limits to Modern Politics, Murphy Institute studies in political economy. Cambridge University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1986. Neorealism and Its Critics. The Political economy of international change. Columbia University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 1989. International Institutions and State Power: Essays in International Relations Theory. Westview Press.
Keohane, Robert O. 2005a. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. 1st Princeton classic ed. A Princeton classic edition. Princeton University Press. Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=275144&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Keohane, Robert O. 2005b. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. 1st Princeton classic ed. A Princeton classic edition. Princeton University Press.
Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph S. Nye. 2012. Power and Interdependence. 4th ed. Longman.
Krasner, Stephen D. 1999. Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
Kratochwil, F. 2000. ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s `Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 29 (1): 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290010901.
Kratochwil, F. n.d. ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics’. Review of International Studies (Sevenoaks) 19: 63–80.
Kratochwil, Friedrich. 1993. ‘The Embarrassment of Changes: Neo-Realism as the Science of Realpolitik without Politics’. Review of International Studies 19 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117346.
Kratochwil, friedrich. n.d. ‘Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s "Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 29. London School of Economics.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989a. Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511559044.
Kratochwil, Friedrich V. 1989b. Rules, Norms and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Kubálková, V., Nicholas Greenwood Onuf, and Paul Kowert. 1998. International Relations in a Constructed World. M.E. Sharpe.
Kuhn, Thomas S., and Ian Hacking. 2012. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Fourth edition. The University of Chicago Press.
Lapid, Y. n.d. ‘The Third Debate. On the Prospect of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’. In International Studies Quarterly, vol. 33. no. 3. Blackwell.
Linklater, A. 1995. ‘Neo-Realism in Theory and Practice’. In International Relations Theory Today. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006a. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491528.
Linklater, Andrew, and Hidemi Suganami. 2006b. The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
LITTLE, R. 2000. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’. European Journal of International Relations 6 (3): 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004.
Little, R. n.d. ‘The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations’’. In European Journal of International Relations, vol. 6. no. 3. Sage Publications.
Little, Richard. 2003. ‘The English School vs. American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language?’ Review of International Studies 29 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004431.
Little, Richard. n.d. ‘The English School vs American Realism: A Meeting of Minds or Divided by a Common Language’. In Review of International Studies, 3rd edn, vol. 29. Butterworths.
London School of Economics and Political Science. 1987. Millennium : Journal of International Studies.
Millennium
Journal of International Studies. 16 (2).
M. Nicholson. n.d. ‘"What’s the Use of International Relations”’. Review of International Studies 26 (2): 183–98. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1600244~S1.
Mearsheimer, J.J. n.d. ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War’. In International Security, vol. 15. no. 1. Center for Science and International Affairs.
Mearsheimer, John J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. The Norton series in world poltics. Norton.
Michael J. Smith. n.d. Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Political Traditions in Foreign Policy Series). Louisiana State Univ Pr. Paperback.
Milner, H. n.d. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. In World Politics, vol. 44. no. 3.
Milner, Helen. 1992. ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’. World Politics 44 (03): 466–96. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
Mingst, Karen A., and Jack L. Snyder. 2011a. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. The Norton series in world politics. W.W. Norton.
Mingst, Karen A., and Jack L. Snyder. 2011b. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. The Norton series in world politics. W.W. Norton.
Mingst, Karen A., and Jack L. Snyder. 2011c. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. The Norton series in world politics. W.W. Norton.
Mingst, Karen A., and Jack L. Snyder. 2011d. Essential Readings in World Politics. 4th ed. The Norton series in world politics. W.W. Norton.
Morgenthau, Hans J., Kenneth W. Thompson, and W. David Clinton. 2006. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, H.J. 1995. ‘The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory’. International Theory: Critical Investigations (Basingstoke), 53–71.
Neufeld, Mark. 1995. The Restructuring of International Relations Theory. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Neumann, I.B. 1997. ‘John Vincent and the English School in International Relations’. In The Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?, The new international relations. Routledge.
Nye, J. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40: 235–51.
Nye, Joseph S. 1988. ‘Neorealism and Neoliberalism’. World Politics 40 (02): 235–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363.
Palan, R. n.d.-a. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 26. no. 4. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=62978&jid=RIS&volumeId=26&issueId=04&aid=62977&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=.
Palan, R. n.d.-b. ‘A World of Their Making: An Evaluation of the Constructivist Critique in International Relations’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 26. no. 4. Butterworths.
R. B. J. Walker. 1987. ‘Realism, Change, and International Political Theory’. International Studies Quarterly 31 (1): 65–86. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600660?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
‘Relative Gains and Patterns of International Cooperation’. n.d. In American Political Science Review, 3rd edn, vol. 85.
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. 1990. ‘Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies’. International Studies Quarterly 34 (3): 259–68. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600569?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Robert Jervis. 1988. ‘Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation’. World Politics 40 (3): 317–49. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2010216?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Rosenau, James N., and Mary Durfee. 2000a. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. 2nd ed. Westview Press.
Rosenau, James N., and Mary Durfee. 2000b. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. 2nd ed. Westview Press.
Rosenau, James N., and Mary Durfee. 2000c. Thinking Theory Thoroughly: Coherent Approaches to an Incoherent World. 2nd ed. Westview Press.
Rosenberg, J. 1990. ‘What’s the Matter with Realism?’ Review of International Studies (Sevenoaks) 16: 285–303.
Rothstein, R.L. 2006a. ‘On the Costs of Realism’. Perspectives on World Politics (Abingdon).
Rothstein, R.L. 2006b. ‘On the Costs of Realism’. Perspectives on World Politics (London). Electronic resource. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=29166&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Royal Institute of International Affairs. 2000. International Affairs. 76 (4).
Ruggie, John Gerard. 1998. Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. The new international relations. Routledge.
Sachs, Wolfgang. 1993. Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict. Zed Books.
Said, Edward W. 2003. Orientalism. [New pref. ed.]. Penguin classics. Penguin.
Searle, John R. 1996. The Construction of Social Reality. Penguin.
Shapiro, M. J. 1998. ‘The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 27 (3): 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030501.
Shapiro, Michael J., and Hayward R. Alker. 1996. Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press.
Shapiro, Mike. 2013a. ‘How Does the Nation-State Work?’ In Global Politics: A New Introduction, Second edition. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=514135&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Shapiro, Mike. 2013b. ‘How Does the Nation-State Work?’ In Global Politics: A New Introduction, Second edition. Routledge.
Shapiro, M.J. n.d. ‘The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 27. no. 3. London School of Economics.
Smith, Steve, Ken Booth, and Marysia Zalewski. 1996. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, J. n.d. ‘Averting Anarchy in the New Europe’. International Security (Cambridge, MA) 14: 5–41.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005a. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Electronic resource. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005b. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Electronic resource.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005c. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Electronic resource. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005d. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Electronic resource. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005e. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Electronic resource. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005f. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005g. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall. Electronic resource. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.
Steans, Jill, Lloyd Pettiford, Thomas Diez, and Jill Steans. 2005h. Introduction to International Relations: Perspectives and Themes. 2nd ed. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Steans, Jill, and Jill Steans. 2010. An Introduction to International Relations Theory: Perspectives and Themes. 3rd ed. Longman.
‘Still the English Patient? Closures and Inventions in the English School.’ 2001. International Affairs 77 (4): 931–42. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5408273&site=eds-live&group=trial.
‘Still the English Patient? Closures and Inventions in the English School’’. n.d. In International Affairs, vol. 77. no. 4. Cambridge University Press.
Suganami, H. 1983. ‘The Structure of Institutionalism: An Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations’. In International Relations, vol. 7. no. 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/004711788300700508.
‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’. n.d. In International Organization, vol. 51. no. 4. Cambridge University Press. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/inteorga.
‘The Social Construction of International Society’. n.d. In European Journal of International Relations, 3rd edn, vol. 1. Sage Publications.
Vincent, R.J. 1988. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. In Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 2nd edn, vol. 17. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701.
Vincent, R.J. n.d. ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 2nd edn, vol. 17. London School of Economics.
Vogler, John, Mark F. Imber, and ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme. 1996. The Environment and International Relations. Global environmental change series. Routledge.
Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, R.B.J. 1987. ‘Realism, Change and International Political Theory’. International Studies Quarterly (Cambridge) 31 (1): 65–86.
Walker, R.B.J. 1991. ‘State Sovereignty and the Articulation of Political Space/Time’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 20 (3): 445–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200030201.
Walker, R.B.J., and Richard Ashley. n.d. ‘Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies’. In International Studies Quarterly, vol. 34. Blackwell.
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances. Cornell studies in security affairs. Cornell University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2000. ‘Structural Realism after the Cold War’. In International Security, vol. 25. no. 1. https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560372.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2001. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2010a. Theory of International Politics. Waveland.
Waltz, Kenneth N. 2010b. Theory of International Politics. Waveland.
Waltz, Kenneth N. n.d. Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. Columbia University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=909467.
Waltz, Kenneth N. n.d. ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory.’ Journal of International Affairs 44 (1): 21–37. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9609193524&site=eds-live&group=trial.
Waltz, K.N. n.d.-a. ‘Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory’. In Journal of International Affairs, vol. 44. no. 1. School of International Affairs, Columbia University.
Waltz, K.N. n.d.-b. ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War’. In International Security, vol. 25. no. 1. Center for Science and International Affairs.
Waltz, K.N. n.d.-c. ‘The Emerging Structure of International Politics’. In International Security, vol. 18. no. 2. Center for Science and International Affairs.
Watson, Adam. 1987. ‘Hedley Bull, States Systems and International Societies’. In Review of International Studies, 2nd edn, vol. 13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113701.
Watson, Adam. 1992. The Evolution of International Society: A Comparative Historical Analysis. Routledge.
Weber, C. 1998. ‘Performative States’. Millennium - Journal of International Studies 27 (1): 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270011101.
Weber, C. n.d.-a. ‘Performative States’. In Millennium: Journal of International Studies, vol. 27. London School of Economics.
Weber, C. n.d.-b. ‘Reconsidering Statehood: Examining the Sovereignty/Intervention Boundary’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 18. no. 3. Butterworths.
Weber, Cynthia. 1994. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511559167.
Weber, Cynthia. 1995. Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State, and Symbolic Exchange. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Weldes, Jutta. 1999a. Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Borderlines (Minneapolis, Minn.). University of Minnesota Press.
Weldes, Jutta. 1999b. Constructing National Interests: The United States and the Cuban Missile Crisis. Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press. Electronic resource. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310458.
Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Wheeler, N.J., and T. Dunne. n.d. ‘Hedley Bull’s Pluralism of the Intellect and Solidarism of the Will’’. In International Affairs, vol. 72. no. 1. Cambridge University Press.
Wight, Martin, Hedley Bull, Carsten Holbraad, and Royal Institute of International Affairs. 1986. Power Politics. 2nd ed. Penguin (for) Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Wight, Martin, Hedley Bull, and London School of Economics and Political Science. 1977. Systems of States. Leicester University Press (for) the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Wight, Martin, Gabriele Wight, Brian Porter, and Royal Institute of International Affairs. 1991. International Theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Williams, J. 2002. ‘Territorial Borders, Toleration and the English School’’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 28. no. 4. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/204944767?accountid=14888.
Williams, J. n.d. ‘Territorial Borders, Toleration and the English School’. In Review of International Studies, vol. 28. no. 4. Butterworths.
World Peace Foundation. n.d. International Organization. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/tinternational+organization/tinternational+organization/1%2C49%2C76%2CB/frameset&FF=tinternational+organization&2%2C%2C7/indexsort=-.
Yosef Lapid. 1989. ‘The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era’. International Studies Quarterly 33 (3): 235–54. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600457?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
ZEHFUSS, M. 2001. ‘Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison’. European Journal of International Relations 7 (3): 315–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007003002.
Zehfuss, M. n.d. ‘Constructivism and Identity: A Dangerous Liaison’. In European Journal of International Relations, vol. 7. no. 3. Sage Publications.
Zehfuss, Maja. 2002a. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491795.
Zehfuss, Maja. 2002b. Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Y. n.d. ‘The "English School” in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and Their Diffusion’. In European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9. no. 1. Sage Publications.
Zhang, Yongjin. 151 AD. ‘The "English School” in China: A Travelogue of Ideas and Their Diffusion’’. In European Journal of International Relations, vol. 9. no. 1. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/211999072/fulltextPDF?accountid=14888.
