Academy of Political Science (U.S.). (1972). Political science quarterly. 87.
Adler, E. (n.d.). Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics. In European journal of international relations. (Vol. 3, pp. 319–363). http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S15?/tEuropean+Journal+of+International+Relation/teuropean+journal+of+international+relation/1%2C1%2C2%2CB/frameset&FF=teuropean+journal+of+international+relations&1%2C%2C2
ADLER, E. (1997). Seizing the Middle Ground:: Constructivism in World Politics. European Journal of International Relations, 3(3), 319–363. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066197003003003
Alan James. (1989). The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 15(3), 215–229. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20097183?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate. (n.d.). International Organization, 48(2). http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/inteorga
Ashley, R. K. (n.d.). Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. In Millennium: journal of international studies (Vol. 17, Issue 2, pp. 227–262). London School of Economics.
Ashley, R. K. (1988). Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), 227–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020901
Ashley, R. K. (1996a). The achievements of post-structuralism. In International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
Ashley, R. K. (1996b). The achievements of post-structuralism. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511660054
Baldwin, D. A. (n.d.). Neorealism and neoliberalism : the contemporary debate / David A. Baldwin, editor. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SNeorealism%20and%20Neoliberalism%3A%20The%20Contemporary%20Debate__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
Bartelson, J. (1995a). A genealogy of sovereignty: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Bartelson, J. (1995b). A Genealogy of Sovereignty: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511586385
Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2011a). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2011b). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2011c). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Baylis, J., Smith, S., & Owens, P. (2011d). The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations (5th ed). Oxford University Press.
Beitz, C. (1998). International Liberalism and Distributive Justice: A Survey of Recent Thought. World Politics, 51, 269–296. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/worldpolitics
Bellamy, A. J. (2005a). International society and its critics. Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, A. J. (2005b). International society and its critics [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199265208.001.0001
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1991). The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge: Vol. Penguin social sciences. Penguin.
Booth, K. (2011). Realism and world politics. Routledge.
Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995a). International relations theory today. Pennsylvania State University Press.
Booth, K., & Smith, S. (1995b). International relations theory today. Polity Press.
Brown, C. (n.d.). International theory and international society: the viability of the middle way. In Review of international studies (2nd ed., Vol. 21, pp. 183–196). Butterworths.
Brown, C. (1992). International relations theory: new normative approaches. Columbia University Press.
Brown, C. (1995). International theory and international society: the viability of the middle way? Review of International Studies, 21(02). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619
Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009a). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009b). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009c). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009d). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, C., & Ainley, K. (2009e). Understanding international relations (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bull, H. (2012). The anarchical society: a study of order in world politics (4th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Bull, H., Alderson, K., & Hurrell, A. (2000). Hedley Bull on international society. Palgrave/Macmillan Press.
Bull, H., & Watson, A. (1984). The Expansion of international society. Clarendon.
Burchill, S. (2013a). Theories of international relations (5th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill, S. (2013b). Theories of international relations (5th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill, S. (2013c). Theories of international relations (5th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Burchill, S. (2013d). Theories of international relations (5th ed). Palgrave Macmillan.
Buzan, B. (2004). From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511616617
Buzan, B., Jones, C. A., & Little, R. (1993). The logic of anarchy: neorealism to structural realism: Vol. New directions in world politics. Columbia University Press.
Buzan, B., & Little, R. (n.d.). ‘The "English patient” strikes back: a response to Hall’s mis-diagnosis’. In International affairs (Vol. 77, Issue 4, pp. 943–946). Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001a). Why International Relations has Failed as an Intellectual Project and What to do About it. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 30(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298010300010401
Buzan, B., & Little, R. (2001b). The ‘English patient’ strikes back: a response to Hall’s mis-diagnosis. International Affairs, 77(4), 943–946. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.00227
Campbell, D. (1998a). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Rev. ed). Manchester University Press.
Campbell, D. (1998b). Writing security: United States foreign policy and the politics of identity (Rev. ed). Manchester University Press.
Campbell, D., & Shapiro, M. J. (1999). Moral spaces: rethinking ethics and world politics. University of Minnesota Press.
Campbell, D., & Shapiro, M. J. (2007). Guest Editors’ Introduction. Security Dialogue, 38(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010607080596
Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (2001). The twenty years’ crisis, 1919-1939: an introduction to the study of international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.
Chekel, J. (n.d.). The constructivist turn in International Relations theory. In World politics (Vol. 50, Issue 2, pp. 324–348).
Connolly, W. E. (n.d.). "Identity and Difference in Global Politics. International/Intertextual Relations : Postmodern Readings of World Politics / Edited by James Der Derian, Michael J. Shapiro Advances in Information Systems and Technologies [Electronic Resource] / Álvaro Rocha... [et al.] (Eds.) Human-Environment Relations [Electronic Resource] : Transformative Values in Theory and Practice / Emily Brady, Pauline Phemister, Editors. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SInternationalLw%3D%3DIntertextual%20Relations__Orightresult?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
Constantinou, C. (n.d.). Before the summit: representations of sovereignty on the Himalayas. In Millennium: journal of international studies (Vol. 27, pp. 23–54). London School of Economics.
Constantinou, C. M. (1998). Before the Summit: Representations of Sovereignty on the Himalayas. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 27(1), 23–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270010901
Copeland, D. (2003). A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies, 29(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004273
Copeland., D. C. (n.d.). A realist critique of the English School. In Review of international studies (3rd ed., Vol. 29, pp. 427–441). Butterworths.
Cox, R. W. (1997). The new realism: perspectives on multilateralism and world order: Vol. International political economy series. Multilareralism and the UN system. Macmillan.
Culler, J. D. (1983). On deconstruction: theory and criticism after structuralism. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Cutler, A. C. (n.d.). The "Grotian tradition” in international relations’. In Review of international studies (Vol. 17, Issue 1, pp. 41–65). Butterworths.
Der Derian, J. (1989). The boundaries of knowledge and power in international relations. In International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington Books.
Der Derian, J. (1995a). International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Der Derian, J. (1995b). International theory: critical investigations. Macmillan.
Der Derian, J., & Shapiro, M. J. (1989). International/intertextual relations: postmodern readings of world politics: Vol. Issues in world politics series. Lexington Books.
Deudney, D. (n.d.-a). The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies, 25, 179–196. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/revinterstud
Deudney, D. (n.d.-b). The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies., 25, 179–196. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/treview+of+international+studies/treview+of+international+studies/1%2C3%2C5%2CB/frameset&FF=treview+of+international+studies&2%2C%2C3/indexsort=-
Donnelly, J. (1992). Twentieth-Century Realism. Traditions of International Ethics, Cambridge studies in international relations, 84–111.
Doty, R. L. (1996). Imperial encounters: the politics of representation in North-South relations: Vol. Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press.
Duncan Snidal. (1991). Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Cooperation. In The American Political Science Review (Vol. 85, Issue 3, pp. 701–726). http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1963847?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Dunne, T. (1998). The English School [Electronic resource]. In Inventing international society: a history of the English school: Vol. St. Antony’s series. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230376137
Dunne, T. & St. Antony’s College (University of Oxford). (1998). Inventing international society: a history of the English school: Vol. St. Antony’s series. Macmillan in association with St Antony’s College.
Edkins, J., Persram, N., & Pin-Fat, V. (1999). Sovereignty and subjectivity: Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. L. Rienner.
Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (n.d.). Generalising the International. In Review of international studies (Vol. 31, Issue 3, pp. 451–472). Butterworths.
Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (2005). Generalising the International. Review of International Studies, 31(3), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583
Edkins, J., & Zehfuss, M. (2013). Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition). Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=514135&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Epp, R. (n.d.). The English school on the frontiers of international society: a hermeneutic recollection’. In Review of international studies (Vol. 24, Issue 5, pp. 47–74). Butterworths.
Evans, T., & Wilson, P. (n.d.). Regime theory and the English school of international relations’. In Millennium: journal of international studies (Vol. 21, Issue 3, pp. 329–351). London School of Economics.
Evans, T., & Wilson, P. (1992). Regime Theory and the English School of International Relations: A Comparison. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 21(3), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298920210030701
Fawn, R., & Larkins, J. (1996). International society after the Cold War: anarchy and order reconsidered. Macmillan Press.
Fierke, K. M., & Jørgensen, K. E. (2001). Constructing international relations: the next generation: Vol. International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe.
Finnemore, M. (1996). National interests in international society: Vol. Cornell studies in political economy. Cornell University Press.
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (n.d.-a). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’. In International Organization (Vol. 52, Issue 4). http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=173304&jid=INO&volumeId=52&issueId=04&aid=173303&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=
Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (n.d.-b). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. In International organization (Vol. 52, Issue 4).
Forde, S. (1992). Classical Realism. Traditions of International Ethics, Cambridge studies in international relations, 62–84.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. Penguin.
Foucault, M., & Gordon, C. (1980). Power/knowledge: selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M., & Rabinow, P. (1991). The Foucault reader. Penguin.
Fukuyama, Francis. (151 C.E.). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. In Foreign Affairs (Vol. 76, Issue 3). http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/214267072/fulltext/BC6E5648BEA0478APQ/15?accountid=14888
Gellman, P. (1988). Hans J. Morgenthau and the legacy of political realism - S0260210500113130a.pdf. In Review of International Studies (Vol. 14, pp. 247–266). https://0-journalarchives.jisc.ac.uk.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/media/pdf/cup/archive/RIS14_04/S0260210500113130a.pdf
George, J. (1994a). Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations: Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
George, J. (1994b). Discourses of global politics: a critical (re)introduction to international relations: Vol. Critical perspectives on world politics. Lynne Rienner Publishers.
George, J. (1994c). The Positivist-Realist Phase: Morgenthau, Behavioralism, and the Quest for Certainty. Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to International Relations, Critical perspectives on world politics, 91–110.
Grieco, J. (n.d.). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42, 485–507.
Grieco, J. M. (1988). Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism. International Organization, 42(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027715
Griffiths, M. (1995). Realism, idealism and international politics: a reinterpretation. Routledge.
Groom, A. J. R., & Light, M. (1994a). Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Pinter Publishers.
Groom, A. J. R., & Light, M. (1994b). Contemporary international relations: a guide to theory. Pinter Publishers.
Guzzini, S. (n.d.). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. ISTITUTO UNIV EUROPEOFrom OAIster®, Provided by the OCLC Cooperative, 6(2). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsoai&AN=edsoai.828912677&site=eds-live&group=trial
Guzzini, S. (1997). Realism in international relations and international political economy: the continuing story of a death foretold: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
GUZZINI, S. (2000). A Reconstruction of Constructivism in International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(2), 147–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006002001
Hall, R. B. (1999). National collective identity: social constructs and international systems. Columbia University Press.
Hall, R. B. & Columbia University. Press. (1999). National collective identity: social constructs and international systems [Electronic resource]. Columbia University Press.
Halliday, F. (1994a). Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
Halliday, F. (1994b). Rethinking international relations. Macmillan.
Hedley Bull, state systems and international societies. (n.d.). In Review of international studies (2nd ed., Vol. 13, pp. 147–153). Butterworths.
Hedley Bull’s pluralism of the intellect and solidarism of the will. (1996). International Affairs, 91–107. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9602271958&site=eds-live&group=trial
Hoffman, S. (1987). Liberalism and International Affairs. In Janus and Minerva: essaysin the theory and practice of international politics. Westview Press.
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1990). Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon.
Hollis, M., & Smith, S. (1991). Explaining and understanding international relations. Clarendon Press.
Hovden, E., & Keene, E. (2001). Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’ [Electronic resource]. The Globalization of Liberalism. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230519381
Hovden, E., & Keene, E. (2002). Moral Commitment and Liberal Approaches to World Politics’. The Globalization of Liberalism.
Hurrell, A. (2007). On global order: power, values, and the constitution of international society [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199233106.001.0001
Hutchings, K. (1999a). International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era: Vol. Sage politics texts. Sage Publications. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=255970&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Hutchings, K. (1999b). International political theory: rethinking ethics in a global era: Vol. Sage politics texts. SAGE.
International Peace Research Institute. (1992). Security dialogue [Electronic resource]. http://0-sdi.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/
J. Peter Burgess. (n.d.). Security Dialogue. 35, 403–404. http://0-sdi.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/35/4.toc
Jack Snyder. (1990). Averting Anarchy in the New Europe. International Security, 14(4), 5–41. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2538749?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jackson, R. H. (2000). The global covenant: human conduct in a world of states [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199262012.001.0001
James. (n.d.). The realism of Realism: The state and the study of International Relations. Review of International Studies, 215–229.
Jervis, R. (n.d.). Realism in the Study of International Politics. International Organization, 52, 971–991.
Jervis, R. (1988). Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation. In World Politics (Vol. 40, Issue 03, pp. 317–349). https://doi.org/10.2307/2010216
Jervis, R. (1998). Realism in the Study of World Politics. International Organization, 52(4), 971–991. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550707
John J. Mearsheimer. (1990). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. In International Security (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 5–56). http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2538981?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Jones, R. E. (n.d.). The English school of international relations: a case for closure. In Review of international studies (1st ed., Vol. 7, pp. 1–13). Butterworths.
Jones, R. E. (1981). The English school of international relations: a case for closure. In Review of International Studies (1st ed., Vol. 7). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500115086
Justin Rosenberg. (1990). What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies, 16(4), 285–303. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20097232?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Katzenstein, P. J. (n.d.). The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. In Foreign affairs (Vol. 76, Issue 3, pp. 123–124). Council on Foreign Relations.
Keene, E. (2002a). Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics: Vol. LSE Monographs in International Studies. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491474
Keene, E. (2002b). Beyond the anarchical society: Grotius, colonialism and order in world politics: Vol. LSE monographs in international studies. Cambridge University Press.
Kegley, C. W. (Ed.). (2002). Controversies in international relations theory: realism and the neoliberal challenge. Palgrave Macmillan.
Kenneth N. Waltz. (1993). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. In International Security (Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 44–79). http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2539097?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Keohane, R. (1990). International Liberalism Reconsidered. In The economic limits to modern politics: Vol. Murphy Institute studies in political economy. Cambridge University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1986). Neorealism and its critics: Vol. The Political economy of international change. Columbia University Press.
Keohane, R. O. (1989). International institutions and state power: essays in international relations theory. Westview Press.
Keohane, R. O. (2005a). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy: Vol. A Princeton classic edition (1st Princeton classic ed) [Electronic resource]. Princeton University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=275144&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Keohane, R. O. (2005b). After hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy: Vol. A Princeton classic edition (1st Princeton classic ed). Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R. O., & Nye, J. S. (2012). Power and interdependence (4th ed). Longman.
Krasner, S. D. (1999). Sovereignty: organized hypocrisy. Princeton University Press.
Kratochwil, friedrich. (n.d.). Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s "Social Theory of International Politics” and the Constructivist Challenge. In Millennium: journal of international studies (Vol. 29, pp. 73–101). London School of Economics.
Kratochwil, F. (n.d.). The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of International Studies, 19, 63–80.
Kratochwil, F. (1993). The embarrassment of changes: neo-realism as the science of Realpolitik without politics. Review of International Studies, 19(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117346
Kratochwil, F. (2000). Constructing a New Orthodoxy? Wendt’s `Social Theory of International Politics’ and the Constructivist Challenge. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 29(1), 73–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298000290010901
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989a). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511559044
Kratochwil, F. V. (1989b). Rules, norms and decisions: on the conditions of practical and legal reasoning in international relations and domestic affairs: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Kubálková, V., Onuf, N. G., & Kowert, P. (1998). International relations in a constructed world. M.E. Sharpe.
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012). The structure of scientific revolutions (Fourth edition). The University of Chicago Press.
Lapid, Y. (n.d.). The Third Debate. On the Prospect of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. In International studies quarterly (Vol. 33, Issue 3, pp. 235–254). Blackwell.
Linklater, A. (1995). Neo-realism in Theory and Practice. In International relations theory today (pp. 241–262). Pennsylvania State University Press.
Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006a). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491528
Linklater, A., & Suganami, H. (2006b). The English school of international relations: a contemporary reassessment: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Little, R. (n.d.-a). The English School vs American Realism: a meeting of minds or divided by a common language. In Review of international studies (3rd ed., Vol. 29, pp. 443–460). Butterworths.
Little, R. (n.d.-b). The English School’s contribution to the study of International Relations’. In European journal of international relations (Vol. 6, Issue 3, pp. 395–422). Sage Publications.
LITTLE, R. (2000). The English School’s Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395–422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004
Little, R. (2003). The English School vs. American Realism: a meeting of minds or divided by a common language? Review of International Studies, 29(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210503004431
London School of Economics and Political Science. (1987). Millennium : journal of international studies.
Millennium
Journal of international studies. 16(2).
M. Nicholson. (n.d.). "What’s the use of International Relations”. Review of International Studies, 26(2), 183–198. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/record=b1600244~S1
Mearsheimer, J. J. (n.d.). Back to the Future: Instability in Europe after the Cold War. In International Security (Vol. 15, Issue 1, pp. 5–56). Center for Science and International Affairs.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of Great Power politics: Vol. The Norton series in world poltics. Norton.
Michael J. Smith. (n.d.). Realist Thought from Weber to Kissinger (Political Traditions in Foreign Policy Series) [Paperback]. Louisiana State Univ Pr.
Milner, H. (n.d.). International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. In World politics (Vol. 44, Issue 3, pp. 466–494).
Milner, H. (1992). International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses. World Politics, 44(03), 466–496. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546
Mingst, K. A., & Snyder, J. L. (2011a). Essential readings in world politics: Vol. The Norton series in world politics (4th ed). W.W. Norton.
Mingst, K. A., & Snyder, J. L. (2011b). Essential readings in world politics: Vol. The Norton series in world politics (4th ed). W.W. Norton.
Mingst, K. A., & Snyder, J. L. (2011c). Essential readings in world politics: Vol. The Norton series in world politics (4th ed). W.W. Norton.
Mingst, K. A., & Snyder, J. L. (2011d). Essential readings in world politics: Vol. The Norton series in world politics (4th ed). W.W. Norton.
Morgenthau, H. J. (1995). The Intellectual and Political Functions of Theory. International Theory: Critical Investigations, 53–71.
Morgenthau, H. J., Thompson, K. W., & Clinton, W. D. (2006). Politics among nations: the struggle for power and peace (7th ed). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Neufeld, M. (1995). The restructuring of international relations theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Neumann, I. B. (1997). John Vincent and the English School in International Relations. In The Future of international relations: masters in the making? Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
Nye, J. (1988). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics, 40, 235–251.
Nye, J. S. (1988). Neorealism and Neoliberalism. World Politics, 40(02), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010363
Palan, R. (n.d.-a). A world of their making: an evaluation of the constructivist critique in International Relations. In Review of International Studies (Vol. 26, Issue 4, pp. 575–598). http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/action/displayFulltext?type=1&fid=62978&jid=RIS&volumeId=26&issueId=04&aid=62977&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=
Palan, R. (n.d.-b). A world of their making: an evaluation of the constructivist critique in International Relations. In Review of international studies (Vol. 26, Issue 4, pp. 575–598). Butterworths.
R. B. J. Walker. (1987). Realism, Change, and International Political Theory. International Studies Quarterly, 31(1), 65–86. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600660?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Relative Gains and Patterns of International Cooperation. (n.d.). In American political science review (3rd ed., Vol. 85, pp. 701–726).
Richard K. Ashley and R. B. J. Walker. (1990). Introduction: Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. International Studies Quarterly, 34(3), 259–268. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600569?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Robert Jervis. (1988). Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation. World Politics, 40(3), 317–349. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2010216?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Rosenau, J. N., & Durfee, M. (2000a). Thinking theory thoroughly: coherent approaches to an incoherent world (2nd ed). Westview Press.
Rosenau, J. N., & Durfee, M. (2000b). Thinking theory thoroughly: coherent approaches to an incoherent world (2nd ed). Westview Press.
Rosenau, J. N., & Durfee, M. (2000c). Thinking theory thoroughly: coherent approaches to an incoherent world (2nd ed). Westview Press.
Rosenberg, J. (1990). What’s the Matter with Realism? Review of International Studies, 16, 285–303.
Rothstein, R. L. (2006a). On the costs of realism. Perspectives on World Politics.
Rothstein, R. L. (2006b). On the costs of realism [Electronic resource]. Perspectives on World Politics. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=29166&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Royal Institute of International Affairs. (2000). International affairs. 76(4).
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the world polity: essays on international institutionalization: Vol. The new international relations. Routledge.
Sachs, W. (1993). Global ecology: a new arena of political conflict. Zed Books.
Said, E. W. (2003). Orientalism: Vol. Penguin classics ([New pref. ed.]). Penguin.
Searle, J. R. (1996). The construction of social reality. Penguin.
Shapiro, M. (2013a). How does the nation-state work? In Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition). Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=514135&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Shapiro, M. (2013b). How does the nation-state work? In Global politics: a new introduction (Second edition). Routledge.
Shapiro, M. J. (n.d.). The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality. In Millennium: journal of international studies (Vol. 27, Issue 3, pp. 695–713). London School of Economics.
Shapiro, M. J. (1998). The Events of Discourse and the Ethics of Global Hospitality. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 27(3), 695–713. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270030501
Shapiro, M. J., & Alker, H. R. (1996). Challenging boundaries: global flows, territorial identities: Vol. Borderlines. University of Minnesota Press.
Smith, S., Booth, K., & Zalewski, M. (1996). International theory: positivism and beyond. Cambridge University Press.
Snyder, J. (n.d.). Averting Anarchy in the New Europe. International Security, 14, 5–41.
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005a). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005b). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005c). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005d). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005e). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005f). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005g). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed) [Electronic resource]. Pearson/Prentice Hall. http://www.MyiLibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=177127&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Steans, J., Pettiford, L., Diez, T., & Steans, J. (2005h). Introduction to international relations: perspectives and themes (2nd ed). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Steans, J., & Steans, J. (2010). An introduction to international relations theory: perspectives and themes (3rd ed). Longman.
Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English School’. (n.d.). In International affairs (Vol. 77, Issue 4, pp. 931–942). Cambridge University Press.
Still the English patient? Closures and inventions in the English school. (2001). International Affairs, 77(4), 931–942. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5408273&site=eds-live&group=trial
Suganami, H. (1983). The Structure of Institutionalism: an Anatomy of British Mainstream International Relations. In International Relations (Vol. 7, Issue 5, pp. 2363–2381). https://doi.org/10.1177/004711788300700508
Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. (n.d.). In International Organization (Vol. 51, Issue 4, pp. 513–553). Cambridge University Press. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/inteorga
The social construction of international society. (n.d.). In European journal of international relations (3rd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 367–389). Sage Publications.
Vincent, R. J. (n.d.). Hedley Bull and order in international politics. In Millennium: journal of international studies (2nd ed., Vol. 17, pp. 195–213). London School of Economics.
Vincent, R. J. (1988). Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics. In Millennium - Journal of International Studies (2nd ed., Vol. 17, pp. 195–213). https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701
Vogler, J., Imber, M. F., & ESRC Global Environmental Change Programme. (1996). The environment and international relations: Vol. Global environmental change series. Routledge.
Walker, R. B. J. (1987). Realism, Change and International Political Theory. International Studies Quarterly, 31(1), 65–86.
Walker, R. B. J. (1991). State Sovereignty and the Articulation of Political Space/Time. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 20(3), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298910200030201
Walker, R. B. J. (1993). Inside/outside: international relations as political theory: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Walker, R. B. J., & Ashley, R. (n.d.). Speaking the Language of Exile: Dissident Thought in International Studies. In International studies quarterly (Vol. 34, pp. 259–268). Blackwell.
Walt, S. M. (1987). The origins of alliances: Vol. Cornell studies in security affairs. Cornell University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (n.d.-a). Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=909467
Waltz, K. N. (n.d.-b). Realist Thought and Neorealist Theory. In Journal of international affairs (Vol. 44, Issue 1, pp. 21–37). School of International Affairs, Columbia University.
Waltz, K. N. (n.d.-c). Structural Realism After the Cold War. In International Security (Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5–41). Center for Science and International Affairs.
Waltz, K. N. (n.d.-d). The Emerging Structure of International Politics. In International Security (Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 44–79). Center for Science and International Affairs.
Waltz, K. N. (2000). Structural Realism after the Cold War. In International Security (Vol. 25, Issue 1, pp. 5–41). https://doi.org/10.1162/016228800560372
Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the state, and war: a theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
Waltz, K. N. (2010a). Theory of international politics. Waveland.
Waltz, K. N. (2010b). Theory of international politics. Waveland.
Waltz, Kenneth N. (n.d.). Realist thought and neorealist theory. Journal of International Affairs, 44(1), 21–37. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=9609193524&site=eds-live&group=trial
Watson, A. (1987). Hedley Bull, states systems and international societies. In Review of International Studies (2nd ed., Vol. 13, pp. 147–153). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113701
Watson, A. (1992). The evolution of international society: a comparative historical analysis. Routledge.
Weber, C. (n.d.-a). Performative States. In Millennium: journal of international studies (Vol. 27, pp. 77–96). London School of Economics.
Weber, C. (n.d.-b). Reconsidering statehood: examining the sovereignty/intervention boundary. In Review of international studies (Vol. 18, Issue 3, pp. 199–216). Butterworths.
Weber, C. (1994). Simulating Sovereignty: Intervention, the State and Symbolic Exchange: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511559167
Weber, C. (1995). Simulating sovereignty: intervention, the state, and symbolic exchange: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Weber, C. (1998). Performative States. Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 27(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298980270011101
Weldes, J. (1999a). Constructing national interests: the United States and the Cuban missile crisis: Vol. Borderlines (Minneapolis, Minn.). University of Minnesota Press.
Weldes, J. (1999b). Constructing national interests: the United States and the Cuban missile crisis: Vol. Borderlines [Electronic resource]. University of Minnesota Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=310458
Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Wheeler, N. J., & Dunne, T. (n.d.). Hedley Bull’s pluralism of the intellect and solidarism of the will’. In International affairs (Vol. 72, Issue 1, pp. 91–107). Cambridge University Press.
Wight, M., Bull, H., Holbraad, C., & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1986). Power politics (2nd ed). Penguin (for) Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Wight, M., Bull, H., & London School of Economics and Political Science. (1977). Systems of states. Leicester University Press (for) the London School of Economics and Political Science.
Wight, M., Wight, G., Porter, B., & Royal Institute of International Affairs. (1991). International theory: the three traditions. Leicester University Press for the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
Williams, J. (n.d.). Territorial borders, toleration and the English School. In Review of international studies (Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 737–758). Butterworths.
Williams, J. (2002). Territorial borders, toleration and the English School’. In Review of International Studies (Vol. 28, Issue 4, pp. 737–758). http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/204944767?accountid=14888
World Peace Foundation. (n.d.). International organization. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search~S1?/tinternational+organization/tinternational+organization/1%2C49%2C76%2CB/frameset&FF=tinternational+organization&2%2C%2C7/indexsort=-
Yosef Lapid. (1989). The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory in a Post-Positivist Era. International Studies Quarterly, 33(3), 235–254. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2600457?origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Zehfuss, M. (n.d.). Constructivism and identity: A dangerous liaison. In European journal of international relations (Vol. 7, Issue 3, pp. 315–348). Sage Publications.
ZEHFUSS, M. (2001). Constructivism and Identity:: A Dangerous Liaison. European Journal of International Relations, 7(3), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066101007003002
Zehfuss, M. (2002a). Constructivism in International Relations: The Politics of Reality: Vol. Cambridge Studies in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511491795
Zehfuss, M. (2002b). Constructivism in international relations: the politics of reality: Vol. Cambridge studies in international relations. Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, Y. (n.d.). The "English School” in China: a travelogue of ideas and their diffusion. In European journal of international relations (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 87–114). Sage Publications.
Zhang, Y. (151 C.E.). The "English School” in China: a travelogue of ideas and their diffusion’. In European Journal of International Relations (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 87–114). http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/211999072/fulltextPDF?accountid=14888
