[1]
Alfonso, A.I. Working images : visual research and representation in ethnography.
[2]
Alfonso, A.I. Working images : visual research and representation in ethnography.
[3]
Alfonso, A.I. Working images : visual research and representation in ethnography.
[4]
Allen, L. 2011. The camera never lies?: analysing photographs in research on sexualities and schooling. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 32, 5 (Dec. 2011), 761–777. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.620757.
[5]
Allen, L. 2008. Young people’s ‘agency’ in sexuality research using visual methods. Journal of Youth Studies. 11, 6 (Dec. 2008), 565–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802225744.
[6]
Allen, L. 2008. Young people’s ‘agency’ in sexuality research using visual methods. Journal of Youth Studies. 11, 6 (Dec. 2008), 565–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260802225744.
[7]
American Sociological Association: Ethics and the Code of Ethics: http://www.asanet.org/about/ethics.cfm.
[8]
Analia Inés Meo 2010. Picturing Students’ Habitus: The Advantages and Limitations of Photo-Elicitation Interviewing in a Qualitative Study in the City of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 9, 2 (2010), 149–171.
[9]
Annette Kuhn 1995. Ch.1 Family Secrets: an Introduction. Family secrets: acts of memory and imagination. Verso. 1–10.
[10]
Apel, D. 2004. Imagery of lynching: black men, white women, and the mob. Rutgers University Press.
[11]
Back, L. 2009. Portrayal and betrayal: Bourdieu, photography and sociological life. The Sociological Review. 57, 3 (Aug. 2009), 471–490. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2009.01850.x.
[12]
Banks, M. 2007. Using visual data in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[13]
Banks, M. 2007. Using visual data in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[14]
Banks, M. 2007. Using visual data in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[15]
Banks, M. 2007. Using visual data in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[16]
Banks, M. 2007. Using visual data in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[17]
Banks, M. 2007. Using visual data in qualitative research. Sage Publications.
[18]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[19]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[20]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[21]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[22]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[23]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[24]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[25]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[26]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[27]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[28]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[29]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[30]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[31]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[32]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[33]
Banks, M. 2001. Visual methods in social research. SAGE.
[34]
Barbie Zelizer 1998. Remembering to forget. University of Chicago Press.
[35]
Barr, M. 2009. The alchemy of the photograph. Visual Studies. 24, 1 (Mar. 2009), 66–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860902732728.
[36]
Barr, M. 2009. The alchemy of the photograph. Visual Studies. 24, 1 (Mar. 2009), 66–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860902732728.
[37]
Barr, M. 2009. The alchemy of the photograph. Visual Studies. 24, 1 (Mar. 2009), 66–70. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860902732728.
[38]
Barrett, D. 2004. Photo‐documenting the needle exchange: methods and ethics. Visual Studies. 19, 2 (Oct. 2004), 145–149. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586042000301647.
[39]
Barrett, T. 1996. Criticizing photographs: an introduction to understanding images. Mayfield Publishing Company.
[40]
Barrett, T. 1996. Criticizing photographs: an introduction to understanding images. Mayfield Publishing Company.
[41]
Barrett, T. 1996. Criticizing photographs: an introduction to understanding images. Mayfield Publishing Company.
[42]
Batchen, G. et al. 2012. Picturing atrocity: photography in crisis. Reaktion Books.
[43]
Bateson, G. and Mead, M. 1942. Balinese character: a photographic analysis. The New York Academy of Sciences].
[44]
Battlefield earth: http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2004/may/06/photography.
[45]
Baym, N.K. 2010. Personal connections in the digital age. Polity.
[46]
Becker, H.S. 2002. Visual evidence: A                              , the specified generalization, and the work of the reader. Visual Studies. 17, 1 (Jan. 2002), 3–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137327.
[47]
Becker, H.S. 2002. Visual Evidence: A Seventh Man, the specified generalisation, and the work of the reader. Visual Studies. 17, 1 (Jan. 2002), 3–11. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137327.
[48]
Becker, H.S. 1995. Visual sociology, documentary photography, and photojournalism: It’s (almost) all a matter of context. Visual Sociology. 10, 1–2 (1995), 5–14.
[49]
Behdad, A. 2001. The Power-Ful Art of Qajar Photography: Orientalism and (Self)-Orientalizing in Nineteenth-Century Iran. Iranian Studies. 34, 1 (2001), 141–151.
[50]
Behdad, A. 2001. The Power-Ful Art of Qajar Photography: Orientalism and (Self)-Orientalizing in Nineteenth-Century Iran. Iranian Studies. 34, 1 (2001), 141–151.
[51]
Benjamin, W. and Underwood, J.A. 2008. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. Penguin.
[52]
Berger, J. 2009. About looking. Bloomsbury.
[53]
Berger, J. and Mohr, J. 1982. Another way of telling. Writers and Readers Publishing.
[54]
Biro, M. 2012. From Analogue to Digital Photography: Bernd and Hilla Becher and Andreas Gursky. History of Photography. 36, 3 (Aug. 2012), 353–366. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2012.686242.
[55]
Boeck, F. de et al. 2004. Kinshasa: tales of the invisible city. Ludion.
[56]
Bolton, A. et al. 2001. Picture This: Researching Child Workers. Sociology. 35, 2 (May 2001), 501–518. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0038038501000244.
[57]
Brassaï 2001. The secret Paris of the 30’s. Thames & Hudson.
[58]
Briski, Z. 2004. Born into brothels: photographs by the children of Calcutta. Umbrage.
[59]
Briski, Z. 2004. Born into brothels: photographs by the children of Calcutta. Umbrage.
[60]
British Educational Research Association 11AD. Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.
[61]
British Educational Research Association 11AD. Revised Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research.
[62]
Brothers, C. 1997. War and photography: a cultural history. Routledge.
[63]
Brower, Kenneth Photography in the Age of Falsification. The Atlantic Monthly. 281, 5, 92–97.
[64]
Bryman, A. 2004. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[65]
Bryman, A. 2004. Social research methods. Oxford University Press.
[66]
Burke, C. 2001. Hands-on history: towards a critique of the ‘everyday’. History of Education. 30, 2 (Mar. 2001), 191–201. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600010012463.
[67]
Burke, C. and Grosvenor, I. 2007. The progressive image in the history of education: stories of two schools. Visual Studies. 22, 2 (Sep. 2007), 155–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701507107.
[68]
Burke, C. and Ribeiro de Castro, H. 2007. The School Photograph: Portraiture and the Art of Assembling the Body of the Schoolchild. History of Education. 36, 2 (Mar. 2007), 213–226. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600601171450.
[69]
Burtynsky, E. et al. 2009. Burtynsky: oil. Steidl.
[70]
Carol Wolkowitz 31AD. Carol Wolkowitz: Flesh and Stone Revisited. Sociological Research Online. 17, 2 (31AD).
[71]
Catherine Lutz and Jane Collins 2003. Ch.33 The Photograph as an Intersection of Gazes. The photography reader. Routledge. 354–374.
[72]
Chalfen, R. 2009. ‘It’s only a picture’: sexting, ‘smutty’ snapshots and felony charges. Visual Studies. 24, 3 (Nov. 2009), 258–268. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903309203.
[73]
Chambers, D. 2001. Representing the family. SAGE.
[74]
Chaplin, E. 1994. Sociology and visual representation. Routledge.
[75]
Chaplin, E. 2006. The convention of captioning: W. G. Sebald and the release of the captive image. Visual Studies. 21, 1 (Apr. 2006), 42–53. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860600613212.
[76]
Charles Petersen In the World of Facebook. The New York Review of Books. LVII, 325, 8–11.
[77]
Clark, C.D. 1999. The Autodriven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children’s experience. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 39–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583801.
[78]
Clark, C.D. 1999. The Autodriven interview: A photographic viewfinder into children’s experience. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 39–50. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583801.
[79]
Clark-Ibáñez, Marisol Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews. The American Behavioral Scientist. 47, 12, 1507–1527.
[80]
Collier, J. and Collier, M. 1986. Visual anthropology: photography as a research method. University of New Mexico Press.
[81]
Collier, J. and Collier, M. 1986. Visual anthropology: photography as a research method. University of New Mexico Press.
[82]
Collier, J. and Collier, M. 1986. Visual anthropology: photography as a research method. University of New Mexico Press.
[83]
Connor Graham and Mark Rouncefield Photo Practices and Family Values in Chinese Households. 2008 Workshop on Social Interaction and Mundane Technologies (SIMTech ’08).
[84]
Cornelia Brink 2000. Secular Icons: Looking at Photographs from Nazi Concentration Camps. History & Memory. 12, 1 (2000), 135–150.
[85]
David Morris ed. McCullin [DVD].
[86]
Davidov, V.M. 2004. Representing representations: the ethics of filming at Ground Zero. Visual Studies. 19, 2 (Oct. 2004), 162–169. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586042000301665.
[87]
Del Tredici, R. 1987. At work in the fields of the bomb. Harrap.
[88]
Divya P. Tolia-Kelly Materializing post-colonial geographies: examining the textural landscapes of migration in the South Asian home. Geoforum. 35, 6, 675–688.
[89]
Drazin, A. and Frohlich, D. 2007. Good Intentions: Remembering through Framing Photographs in English Homes. Ethnos. 72, 1 (Mar. 2007), 51–76. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840701219536.
[90]
Duneier, M. and Carter, O. 2001. Sidewalk. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[91]
Duneier, M. and Carter, O. 2001. Sidewalk. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
[92]
Edwards, E. and Hart, J. 2004. Photographs objects histories: on the materiality of images. Routledge.
[93]
Edwards, E. and Hart, J. 2004. Photographs objects histories: on the materiality of images. Routledge.
[94]
Edwards, S. 2009. Commons and Crowds: Figuring Photography from Above and Below. Third Text. 23, 4 (Jul. 2009), 447–464. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09528820903007735.
[95]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[96]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[97]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[98]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[99]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[100]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[101]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[102]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[103]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[104]
Edwards, S. 2006. Photography: a very short introduction. Oxford University Press.
[105]
Elizabeth Chaplin 2005. Elizabeth Chaplin: The Photograph in Theory. Sociological Research Online. 10, 1 (2005).
[106]
Elizabeth Chaplin 2002. The Photograph in Theory. Sociological Research Online. 10, 1 (2002).
[107]
Elizabeth Chaplin 2002. The Photograph in Theory. Sociological Research Online. 10, 1 (2002).
[108]
Feldstein, P. and Bloom, S.G. 2008. The Oxford project. Welcome Books.
[109]
Fermi, R. et al. 1995. Picturing the bomb: photographs from the secret world of the Manhattan Project. H.N. Abrams.
[110]
Fineman, M. et al. 2012. Faking it: manipulated photography before Photoshop. Metropolitan Museum of Art.
[111]
Fischman, G.E. 2001. Reflections About Images,Visual Culture, and Educational Research. Educational Researcher. 30, 8 (Nov. 2001), 28–33. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030008028.
[112]
Flick, U. et al. 2004. A companion to qualitative research. SAGE.
[113]
Furman, F.K. 1997. Facing the mirror: older women and beauty shop culture. Routledge.
[114]
Gallagher, C. American ground zero: the secret nuclear war. [MIT Press].
[115]
Ganzel, B. 1984. Dust bowl descent. University of Nebraska Press.
[116]
George and Njuguna, J. 2007. The Mathare Youth Sports Association (MYSA) ShootBack Project. Children, Youth and Environments. 17, 3 (2007), 227–235.
[117]
Gianotti, E. 2004. Through the lens of the camera in remote mining sites in the Peruvian highlands. Visual Studies. 19, 2 (Oct. 2004), 126–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586042000301629.
[118]
Gillian Rose 2003. Family Photographs and Domestic Spacings: A Case Study. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. 28, 1 (2003), 5–18.
[119]
Gillian Rose Practising photography: an archive, a study, some photographs and a researcher. Journal of Historical Geography. 26, 4, 555–571.
[120]
Gourevitch, P. and Morris, E. 2008. Standard operating procedure: a war story. Picador.
[121]
Graham-Brown, S. 1988. Images of women: the portrayal of women in photography of the Middle East, 1860-1950. Columbia University Press.
[122]
Greenfield, L. and University of Arizona 2002. Girl culture. Chronicle Books.
[123]
Halberstam, J. 1998. Female masculinity. Duke University Press.
[124]
Halberstam, J. 2005. In a queer time and place: transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York University Press.
[125]
Haldrup, M. and Larsen, J. 2003. The Family Gaze. Tourist Studies. 3, 1 (Apr. 2003), 23–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468797603040529.
[126]
Hallman, B.C. and Benbow, S.M.P. 2007. Family leisure, family photography and zoos: exploring the emotional geographies of families. Social & Cultural Geography. 8, 6 (Dec. 2007), 871–888. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360701712636.
[127]
Hammond, J.D. 2004. Photography and ambivalence. Visual Studies. 19, 2 (Oct. 2004), 135–145. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586042000301638.
[128]
Harper, D. 2002. Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual Studies. 17, 1 (Jan. 2002), 13–26. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860220137345.
[129]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[130]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[131]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[132]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[133]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[134]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[135]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[136]
Harper, D.A. 2012. Visual sociology. Routledge.
[137]
Herbert Gallery ed. Coming to Coventry, Stories from the South Asian Pioneers. Herbert Gallery -Coventry Teaching PCT (2006).
[138]
Hirsch, M. 1999. The familial gaze. Dartmouth College.
[139]
Holgate, J. et al. 2012. Visualizing ‘community’: an experiment in participatory photography among Kurdish diasporic workers in London. The Sociological Review. 60, 2 (May 2012), 312–332. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2012.02075.x.
[140]
Hutnyk, J. 1996. The rumour of Calcutta: tourism, charity and the poverty of  representation. Zed.
[141]
Inconvenient Evidence: Iraqi Prison Photographs from Abu Ghraib: 2004. http://museum.icp.org/museum/exhibitions/abu_ghraib/.
[142]
Jagose, A. 1996. Queer theory: an introduction. New York University Press.
[143]
Joanou, J.P. 2009. The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies. 24, 3 (Nov. 2009), 214–223. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903309120.
[144]
John Grady Visual Research at the Crossroads. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 9, 3.
[145]
Johnsrud, B. 2011. Putting the pieces together again: digital photography and the compulsion to order violence at Abu Ghraib. Visual Studies. 26, 2 (Jun. 2011), 154–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571894.
[146]
Johnsrud, B. 2011. Putting the pieces together again: digital photography and the compulsion to order violence at Abu Ghraib. Visual Studies. 26, 2 (Jun. 2011), 154–168. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571894.
[147]
Jon Prosser 1992. Personal Reflections on the Use of Photography in an Ethnographic Case Study. British Educational Research Journal. 18, 4 (1992), 397–411.
[148]
Jon Prosser et al. 2008. Visual Research Ethics at the Crossroads. NCRM Working Paper Realities. NCRM EPrints Repository.
[149]
Jon Wagner 2007. Ch.2 Observing Culture and Social Life: Documentary Photography, Fieldwork and Social Research. Visual research methods: image, society, and representation. Sage Publications. 23–59.
[150]
Jonathan Jones The fake photographs that predate Photoshop.
[151]
Judith Butler 2007. Torture and the Ethics of Photography. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 25, (2007), 951–966.
[152]
Julia Day ‘We had 50 images within an hour’.
[153]
Just one more ...: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2006/aug/12/familyandrelationships.family.
[154]
Kirby, T. 2007. The genius of photography. BBC4.
[155]
Klett, M. et al. 2006. After the ruins, 1906 and 2006: rephotographing the San Francisco earthquake and fire. University of California Press.
[156]
Knowles, C. 2006. Seeing race through the lens. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 29, 3 (May 2006), 512–529. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870600597917.
[157]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[158]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[159]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[160]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[161]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[162]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[163]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[164]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[165]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[166]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[167]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[168]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[169]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[170]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[171]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[172]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[173]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[174]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[175]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[176]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[177]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[178]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[179]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[180]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[181]
Knowles, C. and Sweetman, P. 2004. Picturing the social landscape: visual methods in the sociological imagination. Routledge.
[182]
Kuhn, A. 2007. Photography and cultural memory: a methodological exploration. Visual Studies. 22, 3 (Dec. 2007), 283–292. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860701657175.
[183]
Kuhn, A. and McAllister, K.E. 2006. Locating memory: photographic acts. Berghahn Books.
[184]
Kuhn, A. and McAllister, K.E. 2006. Locating memory: photographic acts. Berghahn Books.
[185]
Kuhn, A. and McAllister, K.E. 2006. Locating memory: photographic acts. Berghahn Books.
[186]
Kuhn, A. and McAllister, K.E. 2006. Locating memory: photographic acts. Berghahn Books.
[187]
Kunard, A. 2006. Traditions of Collecting and Remembering. Early Popular Visual Culture. 4, 3 (Nov. 2006), 227–243. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17460650601002214.
[188]
Lalvani, S. 1996. Photography, vision, and the production of modern bodies. State University of New York Press.
[189]
Langford, M. and Musée McCord d’histoire canadienne 2001. Suspended conversations: the afterlife of memory in photographic albums. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
[190]
Leathwood, C. 2013. Re/presenting intellectual subjectivity: gender and visual imagery in the field of higher education. Gender and Education. 25, 2 (Mar. 2013), 133–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2011.590467.
[191]
Lenman, R. 2005. The Oxford companion to the photograph. Oxford University Press.
[192]
Lesy, M. and United States 2002. Long time coming: a photographic portrait of America, 1935-1943. Norton.
[193]
Liebenberg, L. 2009. The visual image as discussion point: increasing validity in boundary crossing research. Qualitative Research. 9, 4 (Sep. 2009), 441–467. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109337877.
[194]
Linfield, S. 2010. The cruel radiance: photography and political violence. University of Chicago Press.
[195]
Linfield, S. 2010. The cruel radiance: photography and political violence. The University of Chicago Press.
[196]
Lister, M. 1995. The Photographic image in digital culture. Routledge.
[197]
Lister, M. ed. 2013. The photographic image in digital culture. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
[198]
Luttrell, W. and Chalfen, R. 2010. Lifting up voices of participatory visual research. Visual Studies. 25, 3 (Dec. 2010), 197–200. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523270.
[199]
Lutz, C. and Collins, J.L. 1993. Reading National geographic. University of Chicago Press.
[200]
Mannay, D. 2010. Making the familiar strange: can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research. 10, 1 (Feb. 2010), 91–111. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109348684.
[201]
Manoff, M. 2004. Theories of the Archive from Across the Disciplines. portal: Libraries and the Academy. 4, 1 (2004), 9–25. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0015.
[202]
Marcus Banks 2001. Ch.1 Reading Narratives. Visual methods in social research. SAGE. 9–12.
[203]
Marcus Banks 2001. Ch.1 Reading Narratives. Visual methods in social research. SAGE. 9–12.
[204]
Margolis, E. 1999. Class Pictures: Representations of race, gender and ability in a century of school photography. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 7–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583800.
[205]
Margolis, E. 1999. Class Pictures: Representations of race, gender and ability in a century of school photography. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 7–38. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583800.
[206]
Margolis, E. 1988. Mining Photographs: Unearthing the Meanings of Historical Photos. Radical History Review. 1988, 40 (Jan. 1988), 33–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/01636545-1988-40-33.
[207]
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. 2011. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE.
[208]
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. 2011. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE.
[209]
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. 2011. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE.
[210]
Margolis, E. and Pauwels, L. 2011. The SAGE handbook of visual research methods. SAGE.
[211]
Margolis, Eric 2004. Images of assimilation: photographs of Indian schools in Arizona. History of Education. 33, 2 (2004). DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/0046760042000151456.
[212]
Marianne Hirsch 1997. Ch.5 A Terrible Picture. Family frames: photography, narrative, and postmemory. Harvard University Press. 184–187.
[213]
Marien, M.W. 2002. Photography: a cultural history. Laurence King.
[214]
Marien, M.W. 2002. Photography: a cultural history. Laurence King.
[215]
Marquis, M. and Manceau, M. 2007. Individual Factors Determining the Food Behaviours of Single Men Living in Apartments in Montreal as Revealed by Photographs and Interviews. Journal of Youth Studies. 10, 3 (Jul. 2007), 305–316. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260701216158.
[216]
Martha Langford 2006. Ch.10 Speaking the Album. Locating memory: photographic acts. Berghahn Books. 223–246.
[217]
Menzel, P. and Mann, C.C. 1995. Material world: a global family portrait. Sierra Club Books.
[218]
Mike Davis 1993. The Dead West; Ecocide in Marlboro Country. New Left Review. 200, (1993), 49–73.
[219]
Mirzoeff, N. 1998. The visual culture reader. Routledge.
[220]
Mitchell, C. 2011. Doing visual research. SAGE.
[221]
Mitchell, W.J. 1992. The reconfigured eye: visual truth in the post-photographic era. MIT Press.
[222]
Mizen, P. 2005. A little ‘light work’? Children’s images of their labour. Visual Studies. 20, 2 (Oct. 2005), 124–139. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860500244001.
[223]
Mizen, P. and Ofosu-Kusi, Y. 2010. Unofficial truths and everyday insights: understanding voice in visual research with the children of Accra’s urban poor. Visual Studies. 25, 3 (Dec. 2010), 255–267. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2010.523278.
[224]
Moore, G. et al. 2008. The photo‐survey research method: capturing life in the city. Visual Studies. 23, 1 (Apr. 2008), 50–62. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908536.
[225]
Morris, E. et al. 2009. Standard operating procedure. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment.
[226]
Newman, J. et al. 2004. Twin lens reflex: the portrait photographs of Bandele ‘Tex’ Ajetunmobi and Harry Jacobs. Black Cultural Archives.
[227]
Newman, J. et al. 2004. Twin lens reflex: the portrait photographs of Bandele ‘Tex’ Ajetunmobi and Harry Jacobs. Black Cultural Archives.
[228]
Orellana, M.F. 1999. Space and place in an Urban Landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 73–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583803.
[229]
Orellana, M.F. 1999. Space and place in an Urban Landscape: Learning from children’s views of their social worlds. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 73–89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583803.
[230]
Packard, J. 2008. ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies. 23, 1 (Apr. 2008), 63–77. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908544.
[231]
Papademas, D. 2009. IVSA Code of Research Ethics and Guidelines. Visual Studies. 24, 3 (Nov. 2009), 250–257. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903309187.
[232]
Pauli, L. et al. 2003. Manufactured landscapes: the photographs of Edward Burtynsky. National Gallery of Canada in association with Yale University Press.
[233]
Pauwels, L. 2008. A private visual practice going public? Social functions and sociological research opportunities of Web‐based family photography. Visual Studies. 23, 1 (Apr. 2008), 34–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908528.
[234]
Pauwels, L. 2008. A private visual practice going public? Social functions and sociological research opportunities of Web‐based family photography. Visual Studies. 23, 1 (Apr. 2008), 34–49. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908528.
[235]
Pauwels, L. 2006. Ethical Issues of Online (Visual) Research. Visual Anthropology. 19, 3–4 (2006), 365–369.
[236]
Payne, C. 2006. Lessons with Leah: re‐reading the photographic archive of nation in the National Film Board of Canada’s Still Photography Division. Visual Studies. 21, 1 (Apr. 2006), 4–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860600613147.
[237]
Peter Osborne 2000. Traveling light : photography, travel, and visual culture. Manchester University Press.
[238]
Phillip Mizen and Yaw Ofosu-Kusi 31AD. Engaging with a World Outside of Ourselves. Sociological Research Online. 17, 2 (31AD).
[239]
Pink, S. 1999. A woman, a camera and the world of bullfighting: Visual culture as the production of anthropological knowledge. Visual Anthropology. 13, 1 (1999), 71–86.
[240]
Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in  research. SAGE.
[241]
Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in  research. SAGE.
[242]
Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in  research. SAGE.
[243]
Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in  research. SAGE.
[244]
Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in  research. SAGE.
[245]
Pink, S. 2001. Doing visual ethnography: images, media and representation in  research. SAGE.
[246]
Pink, S. 2007. Doing visual ethnography: images, media, and representation in research. Sage Publications.
[247]
Pink, S. 2006. The future of visual anthropology: engaging the senses. Routledge.
[248]
Pink, S. 2006. The future of visual anthropology: engaging the senses. Routledge.
[249]
Pinney, C. 1997. Camera Indica: the social life of Indian photographs. Reaktion Books.
[250]
Piper, H. and Frankham, J. 2007. Seeing Voices and Hearing Pictures: Image as discourse and the framing of image-based research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education. 28, 3 (Sep. 2007), 373–387. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458954.
[251]
Pole, C.J. 2004. Seeing is believing?: approaches to visual research. Elsevier JAI.
[252]
Pole, C.J. 2004. Seeing is believing?: approaches to visual research. Elsevier JAI.
[253]
Poliakoff, S. 2004. Shooting the past. BBC Worldwide.
[254]
Professor Gillian Rose Summary: Family Photography Going Digital.
[255]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[256]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[257]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[258]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[259]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[260]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[261]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[262]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[263]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[264]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[265]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[266]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[267]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[268]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[269]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[270]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[271]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[272]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[273]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer.
[274]
Prosser, J. 1998. Image-based research: a sourcebook for qualitative researchers. Falmer Press.
[275]
Prosser, J. 2007. Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies. 22, 1 (Apr. 2007), 13–30. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860601167143.
[276]
Rancière, J. 2009. The emancipated spectator. Verso.
[277]
Rao, S. 2000. Imperial imaginary: Photography and the invention of the British raj in India. Visual Communication Quarterly. 7, 4 (Sep. 2000), 10–16. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/15551390009363443.
[278]
Raskin, R. 2004. A child at gunpoint: a case study in the life of a photo. Aarhus University Press.
[279]
Research Governance & Ethics: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/rss/researchgovernance_ethics/.
[280]
Rich, M. and Chalfen, R. 1999. Showing and telling asthma: Children teaching physicians with visual narrative. Visual Sociology. 14, 1 (Jan. 1999), 51–71. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725869908583802.
[281]
Richard Chalfen To See What It’s Like To Live Like You: The Popularity of Making Kids Make Pictures, Seeing and Knowing Seminar. Harvard University.
[282]
Richter, R. and Schadler, C. 2009. See my virtual self: dissemination as a characteristic of digital photography – the example of Flickr.com. Visual Studies. 24, 2 (Sep. 2009), 169–177. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860903106179.
[283]
Ritchin, F. 2010. After photography. W. W. Norton.
[284]
Roberts, J. 1998. The art of interruption: realism, photography, and the everyday. Manchester Universtiy Press.
[285]
Rogers, H. and Williamson, A. 2006. Art becomes you: parody, pastiche and the politics of art : materiality in a post-material paradigm. Article Press.
[286]
Rose, G. 2010. Doing family photography: the domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Ashgate.
[287]
Rose, G. 2010. Doing family photography: the domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Ashgate.
[288]
Rose, G. 2010. Doing family photography: the domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Ashgate.
[289]
Rose, G. 2010. Doing family photography: the domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Ashgate.
[290]
Rose, G. 2010. Doing family photography: the domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Ashgate.
[291]
Rose, G. 2010. Doing family photography: the domestic, the public and the politics of sentiment. Ashgate.
[292]
Rose, G. 1997. Engendering the Slum: Photography in East London in the 1930s. Gender, Place & Culture. 4, 3 (Nov. 1997), 277–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699725350.
[293]
Rose, G. 1997. Engendering the Slum: Photography in East London in the 1930s. Gender, Place & Culture. 4, 3 (Nov. 1997), 277–300. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09663699725350.
[294]
Rose, G. 2012. Visual methodologies: an introduction to researching with visual materials. SAGE.
[295]
Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of  visual materials. Sage.
[296]
Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of  visual materials. Sage.
[297]
Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of  visual materials. Sage.
[298]
Rose, G. 2001. Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of  visual materials. Sage.
[299]
Rose, G. 2007. Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. SAGE Publications.
[300]
Rose, G. 2007. Visual methodologies: an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. SAGE Publications.
[301]
Rousmaniere, K. 2001. Questioning the visual in the history of education. History of Education. 30, 2 (Mar. 2001), 109–116. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/00467600010012391.
[302]
Rusted, B. 2004. Editor’s introduction: visual studies, digital imaging and new media. Visual Studies. 19, 1 (Apr. 2004), 2–6. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586042000204807.
[303]
Ryan, J.R. 1997. Picturing empire: photography and the visualisation of the British  Empire. Reaktion.
[304]
Salgado, S. 2004. Sahel: the end of the road. University of California Press.
[305]
Salgado, S. 1993. Workers: an archaeology of the industrial age. Phaidon.
[306]
Salgado, S. and Aperture Foundation 2000. The children: refugees and migrants. Aperture Foundation.
[307]
Sander, A. and Döblin, A. 2003. August Sander: face of our time ; sixty portraits of twentieth-century Germans. Schirmer Art Books.
[308]
Sarvas, R. and Frohlich, D.M. 2011. From snapshots to social media - the changing picture of domestic photography. Springer.
[309]
Sarvas, R. and Frohlich, D.M. 2011. From snapshots to social media - the changing picture of domestic photography. Springer.
[310]
Schwartz, Dona Visual Ethnography:  Using Photography in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology. 12, 2.
[311]
Schwartz, Dona Visual Ethnography:  Using Photography in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology. 12, 2.
[312]
Schwartzenberg, S. 2005. The personal archive as historical record. Visual Studies. 20, 1 (Apr. 2005), 70–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860500064920.
[313]
Schwartzenberg, S. 2005. The personal archive as historical record 1. Visual Studies. 20, 1 (Apr. 2005), 70–82. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860500064920.
[314]
Shanyang Zhao et al. Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships. Computers in Human Behavior. 24, 5, 1816–1836.
[315]
Shore, S. 2007. The nature of photographs. Phaidon Press.
[316]
Shore, S. 2007. The nature of photographs. Phaidon Press.
[317]
Shortt, H. 2012. Identityscapes of a Hair Salon: Work Identities and the Value of Visual Methods. Sociological Research Online. 17, 2 (2012). DOI:https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.2690.
[318]
Simon, T. et al. 2003. The innocents. Umbrage.
[319]
Simons, H. and Usher, R. 2000. Situated ethics in educational research. RoutledgeFalmer.
[320]
Simons, H. and Usher, R. 2000. Situated ethics in educational research. Routledge.
[321]
Sliwinski, S. 2004. A painful labour: responsibility and photography. Visual Studies. 19, 2 (Oct. 2004), 150–162. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586042000301656.
[322]
Smith, M. 2007. Negotiating boundaries and borders: qualitative methodology and development research. Elsevier.
[323]
Social Research Association Ethical Guidelines.
[324]
Sontag, S. 1979. On photography. Penguin.
[325]
Sontag, S. 1979. On photography. Penguin.
[326]
Sontag, S. 2004. Regarding the pain of others. Penguin.
[327]
Sontag, S. 2004. Regarding the pain of others. Penguin.
[328]
Spence, J. and Holland, P. 1991. Family snaps: the meanings of domestic photography. Virago.
[329]
Spencer, S. 2011. Visual research methods in the social sciences: awakening visions. Routledge.
[330]
Spencer, S. 2011. Visual research methods in the social sciences: awakening visions. Routledge.
[331]
Squiers, C. 2005. The body at risk: photography of disorder, illness, and healing. University of California.
[332]
Stanczak, G.C. 2007. Visual research methods: image, society, and representation. Sage Publications.
[333]
Stanczak, G.C. 2007. Visual research methods: image, society, and representation. Sage Publications.
[334]
Stanczak, G.C. 2007. Visual research methods: image, society, and representation. Sage Publications.
[335]
Stanczak, G.C. 2007. Visual research methods: image, society, and representation. Sage Publications.
[336]
Steven J. Gold 1997. Visual Methods in Sociological Analysis - Introduction. Qualitative Sociology. 20, 1 (1997), 3–6.
[337]
Stuart Hall 1984. Ch.25 Reconstruction Work : Images of Postwar Black Settlement. The everyday life reader. Routledge. 251–261.
[338]
Suchar, Charles S. 1997. Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts. Qualitative Sociology. 20, 1 (1997).
[339]
Suchar, Charles S. 1997. Grounding Visual Sociology Research in Shooting Scripts. Qualitative Sociology. 20, 1 (1997).
[340]
Susan Meiselas and Human Rights Watch 2007. Costly Dream.
[341]
Susan Sontag 1979. Ch.1 Plato’s Cave. On photography. Penguin. 3–24.
[342]
Tagg, J. 1988. The burden of representation: essays on photographies and histories. Macmillan.
[343]
Tan, F. et al. 2005. Fiona Tan: countenance. Modern Art Oxford.
[344]
Taylor, J. 1998. Body horror: photojournalism, catastrophe and war. Manchester University Press.
[345]
Terence Wright 2004. Ch.2. Pre-production. The photography handbook. Routledge. 36–76.
[346]
Terence Wright 2004. Ch.2. Pre-production. The photography handbook. Routledge. 36–76.
[347]
The British Sociological Association: http://www.britsoc.co.uk/about/equality/statement-of-ethical-practice.aspx.
[348]
The power of the holiday photo: http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2010/aug/24/power-of-the-holiday-photo.
[349]
Things Are Queer: 1996. http://www.theory.org.uk/ctr-que7.htm.
[350]
Tinkler, P. 2008. A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies. 23, 3 (Dec. 2008), 255–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860802489916.
[351]
Tinkler, P. 2008. A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies. 23, 3 (Dec. 2008), 255–266. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860802489916.
[352]
Torture as pornography: 2004. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/may/07/gender.uk.
[353]
Twomey, C. 2012. Framing Atrocity: Photography and Humanitarianism. History of Photography. 36, 3 (Aug. 2012), 255–264. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/03087298.2012.669933.
[354]
Urry, J. 1990. The Tourist gaze: leisure and travel in contemporary societies. Sage.
[355]
Van House, N.A. 2011. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies. 26, 2 (Jun. 2011), 125–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888.
[356]
Van House, N.A. 2011. Personal photography, digital technologies and the uses of the visual. Visual Studies. 26, 2 (Jun. 2011), 125–134. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571888.
[357]
Vettel-Becker, P. 2002. Destruction and Delight: World War II Combat Photography and the Aesthetic Inscription of Masculine Identity. Men and Masculinities. 5, 1 (Jul. 2002), 80–102. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X02005001004.
[358]
Volcano, D.L. Sublime Mutations.
[359]
Volcano, D.L. and Halberstam, J. 1999. The drag king book. Serpent’s Tail.
[360]
Wells, L. 1997. Photography: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[361]
Wells, L. 1997. Photography: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[362]
Wells, L. 2004. Photography: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[363]
Wells, L. 2004. Photography: a critical introduction. Routledge.
[364]
Wells, L. 2003. The photography reader. Routledge.
[365]
Wells, L. 2003. The photography reader. Routledge.
[366]
Wells, L. 2003. The photography reader. Routledge.
[367]
Wexler, L. 2000. Tender violence: domestic visions in an age of U.S. imperialism. University of North Carolina Press.
[368]
Wexler, L. 2000. Tender violence: domestic visions in an age of U.S. imperialism. University of North Carolina Press.
[369]
What Have We Done? 2004. http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0524-09.htm.
[370]
Winddance Twine, F. 2006. Visual ethnography and racial theory: Family photographs as archives of interracial intimacies. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 29, 3 (May 2006), 487–511. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870600597909.
[371]
Winddance Twine, F. 2006. Visual ethnography and racial theory: Family photographs as archives of interracial intimacies. Ethnic and Racial Studies. 29, 3 (May 2006), 487–511. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870600597909.
[372]
Wombell, P. 1991. Photovideo. Rivers Oram Press.
[373]
Woodley-Baker, R. 2009. Private and public experience captured: young women capture their everyday lives and dreams through photo-narratives. Visual Studies. 24, 1 (Mar. 2009), 19–35. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860902732694.
[374]
Woodward, S. 2008. Digital Photography and Research Relationships: Capturing the Fashion Moment. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 857–872. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094566.
[375]
Woodward, S. 2008. Digital Photography and Research Relationships: Capturing the Fashion Moment. Sociology. 42, 5 (Oct. 2008), 857–872. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038508094566.
[376]
Wright, C.Y. et al. 2010. RETRACTED: Visual Research Methods: Using Cameras to Empower Socially Excluded Black Youth. Sociology. 44, 3 (Jun. 2010), 541–558. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038510362483.
[377]
Wright, T. 2004. The photography handbook. Routledge.
[378]
Wright, T. 2004. The photography handbook. Routledge.
[379]
Young, L. and Barrett, H. 2001. Adapting visual methods: action research with Kampala street children. Area. 33, 2 (Jun. 2001), 141–152. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-4762.00017.
[380]
Zelizer, B. 2010. About to die: how news images move the public. Oxford University Press.
[381]
Zelizer, B. 2010. About to die: how news images move the public. Oxford University Press.
[382]
Zelizer, B. Remembering to forget : Holocaust memory through the camera’s eye.