1.
All That Heaven Allows (1955) [Internet]. FilmFour; Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/0001483A?bcast=95712924
2.
Wyman J, Hudson R, Moorehead A, Nagel C, Grey V, Talbott G, Sirk D, Lee E, Fenwick P, Hunter R, Metty R, Gross F, Skinner F, Universal-International (Firm). All that heaven allows. [London?]: Universal Pictures Video; 2007.
3.
Fassbinder RW, Mira B, Ben Salem EH, Valentin B, Hermann I, Karlowa E, Bucher A, Kreissl G, Mattes D, Symo M, Jürges J, Eymèsz T, Rainer Werner Fassbinder Foundation, Tango Film Produktion, Criterion Collection (Firm), Wellspring Media. Ali, fear eats the soul. [United States]: Criterion Collection; 2003.
4.
Far from Heaven (2002) [Internet]. FilmFour; Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/0054E252?bcast=74586582
5.
Klinger B. The Many Faces of Melodrama. Melodrama and meaning: history, culture, and the films of Douglas Sirk [Internet]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1994. p. 11–20. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8f1afd4b-f599-e711-80cb-005056af4099
6.
Gibbs JE. Mise-en-scène: film style and interpretation [Internet]. London: Wallflower; 2002. Available from: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=927987
7.
Lynn Spigel. Installing the Television Set: Popular Discourses on Television and Domestic Space, 1948–1955. Camera Obscura [Internet]. Duke University Press; 1988 Jan 1;6(1 16):9–46. Available from: http://cameraobscura.dukejournals.org/content/6/1_16/9.citation
8.
Sontang S. Against Interpretation. Against interpretation, and other essays [Internet]. London: Eyre & Spottiswoode; 1967. p. 3–14. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=1d2e7487-799c-e711-80cb-005056af4099
9.
Evans VL. Douglas Sirk, aesthetic modernism and the culture of modernity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2017.
10.
Halliday J. Conversations with Jon Halliday [Internet]. Cahiers du cinéma; 1997. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=halliday++Conversations+with+Jon+Halliday&rh=n%3A266239%2Ck%3Ahalliday++Conversations+with+Jon+Halliday
11.
Mulvey L. Visual and other pleasures. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2008.
12.
Mulvey L. Death 24x a second: stillness and the moving image. London: Reaktion Books; 2006.
13.
Willemen P, British Film Institute. Looks and frictions: essays in cultural studies and film theory. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1994.
14.
Landy M. Imitations of life: a reader on film & television melodrama. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 1991.
15.
Gibbs J, Pye D. Style and meaning: studies in the detailed analysis of film. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2005.
16.
Lehman P. Close viewings: an anthology of new film criticism. Tallahassee, Fla: Florida State University Press; 1990.
17.
Gibbs J, Pye D. Style and meaning: studies in the detailed analysis of film. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2005.
18.
The Cine-Files [Internet]. Available from: http://issue4.thecine-files.com/
19.
Buonanno M. The age of television: experiences and theories [Internet]. Bristol: Intellect; 2008. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2684701
20.
Corner J. Critical ideas in television studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1999.
21.
Ellis J. Visible fictions: cinema, television, video [Internet]. Rev. ed. London: Routledge; 1992. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2882155
22.
Hartley J. Uses of television [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1999. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2881799
23.
Morley D. Family television: cultural power and domestic leisure. London: Routledge; 1988.
24.
Nixon S. Life in the kitchen: Television advertising, the housewife and domestic modernity in Britain, 1955–1969. Contemporary British History [Internet]. 2017 Jan 2;31(1):69–90. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/13619462.2016.1245619
25.
Corner J. Popular television in Britain: studies in cultural history. London: BFI Publishing; 1991.
26.
Pertierra AC, Turner G. Locating television: zones of consumption [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2013. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2724171
27.
Rodan D. Large, sleek, slim, stylish flat screens: Privatized space and the televisual experience. Continuum [Internet]. 2009 Jun;23(3):367–382. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/10304310902884050
28.
Geller M, New Museum of Contemporary Art (New York, N.Y.). From receiver to remote control: the TV set. New York: New Museum of Contemporary Art;
29.
Silverstone R. Television and everyday life [Internet]. London: Routledge; 1994. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2698500
30.
Spigel L. Make room for TV: television and the family ideal in postwar America [Internet]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1992. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2756011
31.
Tichi C. Electronic hearth: creating an American television culture [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 1991. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2905968
32.
Andrews H. Television and British cinema: convergence and divergence since 1990 [Internet]. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2722218
33.
Andrews H. On the Grey Box: Broadcasting Experimental Film and Video on Channel 4’s. Visual Culture in Britain [Internet]. 2011 Jul;12(2):203–218. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/14714787.2011.575262
34.
Barr C, British Film Institute. All our yesterdays: 90 years of British cinema. London: BFI Publishing; 1986.
35.
Barr C, British Film Institute. All our yesterdays: 90 years of British cinema. London: BFI Publishing; 1986.
36.
McLoone M, Hill J. Big picture, small screen: the relations between film and television. Luton: University of Luton Press; 1996.
37.
Klinger B. Beyond the multiplex: cinema, new technologies, and the home [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2006. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2668425
38.
Niessen N. Lives of cinema: against its ‘death’. Screen [Internet]. 2011 Sep 1;52(3):307–326. Available from: https://0-academic-oup-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/screen/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/screen/hjr023
39.
Rodowick DN. The virtual life of film [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press; 2007. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2667173
40.
Stokes JC. On screen rivals: cinema and television in the United States and Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan; 1999.
41.
Grainge P. Ephemeral media: transitory screen culture from television to YouTube. London: BFI; 2011.
42.
Johnson C. Branding television [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2012. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2807202
43.
Ahmed S. Making Feminist Points [Internet]. Available from: https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/
44.
DAVID BORDWELL. NEVER THE TWAIN Why can’t cinephiles and academics just get along? SHALL MEET. Film Comment [Internet]. Film Society of Lincoln Center; 2011;47(3):38–41. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/43459668?refreqid=search%3A350b5d35038cc5cd230d7262e379c3dc
45.
Brunsdon C. Pedagogies of the feminine: feminist teaching and women’s genres. Screen [Internet]. 1991 Dec 1;32(4):364–381. Available from: https://0-academic-oup-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/screen/article/32/4/364/1679919/Pedagogies-of-the-feminine-feminist-teaching-and
46.
Gumbrecht HU, Pfeiffer KL. Materialities of communication. Stanford, Calif: Stanford University Press; 1994.
47.
Sedgwick EK. Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press; 2003.
48.
Scarlet Street (1945) [Internet]. BBC2 England; Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/00017964?bcast=76007713
49.
Perkins VF. "How” is "What”. Film as film: understanding and judging movies [Internet]. Penguin. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972. p. 116–133. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=16d966f4-3d99-e711-80cb-005056af4099
50.
Martin A. Guess-Work: Scarlet Street. Movie: A Journal of Film Criticism [Internet]. 2012;3. Available from: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/arts/film/movie/contents/scarlet_st._final.2.pdf
51.
Cameron I. The Movie book of film noir. London: Studio Vista; 1992.
52.
Gibbs J, Pye D. Style and meaning: studies in the detailed analysis of film. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2005.
53.
Martin A. Mise en scène and film style: from classical Hollywood to new media art. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2014.
54.
Pye D, Leigh J, Smith S. Close-up 02. London: Wallflower; 2007.
55.
Thomas D. Reading Hollywood: spaces and meanings in American film. London: Wallflower; 2001.
56.
Wilson GM. Narration in light: studies in cinematic point of view. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1986.
57.
Wood R. Personal views: explorations in film [Internet]. Rev. ed. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 2006. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2999423
58.
Coen J, Coen E, Macy WH, McDormand F. Fargo. Special ed. Santa Monica, CA: MGM Home Entertainment; 2004.
59.
Clayton A, Klevan A. Introduction: The language and style of film criticism. The language and style of film criticism [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2011. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ceb19b4d-5920-e711-80c9-005056af4099
60.
Goerge Toles. Obvious mysteries in Fargo. Michigan Quarterly Review [Internet]. 1999;38(4). Available from: https://0-literature-proquest-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/searchFulltext.do?id=R01593801&divLevel=0&queryId=3010753398631&trailId=15DE4F2BB9B&area=abell&forward=critref_ft
61.
Britton A, Grant BK. Britton on film: the complete film criticism of Andrew Britton [Internet]. Detroit: Wayne State University Press; 2009. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2988759
62.
Carroll N. On criticism. New York: Routledge; 2009.
63.
Luhr W. The Coen brothers’ Fargo [Internet]. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press; 2004. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2668201
64.
Clayton A, Klevan A. The language and style of film criticism [Internet]. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2585945
65.
Please read: V.F. Perkins, ‘Must We Say What They Mean? Film Criticism and Interpretation’. Movie [Internet]. London: Movie; 1990;34:1–6. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=565b4837-7a9c-e711-80cb-005056af4099
66.
Perkins VF. Film as film: understanding and judging movies. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1972.
67.
Stam R. Film theory: an introduction. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2000.
68.
Grayson Perry: Divided Britain [Internet]. Channel 4; Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/0F03831C?bcast=124243314
69.
Spacey K. House of cards [videorecording].
70.
Williams R. Chapter 4: ‘Programming: distribution and flow’. Television: technology and cultural form [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1990. p. 78–118. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4c8eb77a-c497-e711-80cb-005056af4099
71.
Ellis J. Visible fictions: cinema, television, video [Internet]. Rev. ed. London: Routledge; 1992. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2882155
72.
Mittell J. Complex TV: the poetics of contemporary television storytelling [Internet]. New York: New York University Press; 2015. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3087566
73.
Newcomb HM, Hirsch PM. Television as a cultural forum: Implications for research∗. Quarterly Review of Film Studies [Internet]. 1983 Jun;8(3):45–55. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/10509208309361170
74.
Caldwell JT. Excessive Style: The Crisis of Network Television. Televisuality: style, crisis, and authority in American television [Internet]. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press; 1995. p. 3–31. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8327195d-5720-e711-80c9-005056af4099
75.
Bennett J, Strange N. Television as digital media [Internet]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2680993
76.
Browne N. The political economy of the television (super) text. Quarterly Review of Film Studies [Internet]. 1984 Jun;9(3):174–182. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/10509208409361210?journalCode=gqrf19
77.
Buonanno M. The age of television: experiences and theories [Internet]. Bristol: Intellect; 2008. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2684701
78.
Caldwell JT, Everett A. New media: theories and practices of digitextuality. New York: Routledge; 2003.
79.
Corner J. Critical ideas in television studies. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1999.
80.
Bennett J, Strange N. Television as digital media [Internet]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2680993
81.
Kaplan EA. Regarding television: critical approaches : an anthology. Frederick, MD.: University Publications of America; 1983.
82.
Fiske J. Television culture [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2586371
83.
Geraghty C, Lusted D. The television studies book. London: Arnold; 1998.
84.
Hills M. FROM THE BOX IN THE CORNER TO THE BOX SET ON THE SHELF. New Review of Film and Television Studies [Internet]. 2007 Apr;5(1):41–60. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/17400300601140167
85.
Jacobs J. Issues of judgement and value in television studies. International Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2001 Dec;4(4):427–447. Available from: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/136787790100400404
86.
Bennett J, Strange N. Television as digital media [Internet]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2680993
87.
Lury K. Interpreting television. London: Hodder Arnold; 2005.
88.
McDonald K, Smith-Rowsey D, editors. The Netflix effect: technology and entertainment in the 21st century [Internet]. New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Inc; 2016. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3030558
89.
Mellencamp P. Logics of television: essays in cultural criticism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press; 1990.
90.
Spigel L, Olsson J. Television after TV: essays on a medium in transition [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2004. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2876268
91.
Spigel L. My TV Studies . . . Now Playing on a You Tube Site Near You. Television & New Media [Internet]. 2009 Jan;10(1):149–153. Available from: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/1527476408325895
92.
Spigel L, Olsson J. Television after TV: essays on a medium in transition [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2004. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2876268
93.
Couldry N, McCarthy A. MediaSpace: place, scale, and culture in a media age. London: Routledge; 2004.
94.
Williams R, Williams E. Television: technology and cultural form. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 1990.
95.
Wood H. Television is happening. European Journal of Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2007 Nov;10(4):485–506. Available from: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/1367549407081956
96.
Turner G, Tay J. Television studies after tv: understanding television in the post-broadcast era [Internet]. London: Routledge; 2009. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2876267
97.
Corner, John. Finding data, reading patterns, telling stories: issues in the historiography of television. Media, Culture & Society; [Internet]. 2003;25(2). Available from: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1177/01634437030252006
98.
Wheatley H. Re-viewing television history: critical issues in television historiography [Internet]. London: I. B. Tauris; 2007. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2876271
99.
Lynn Spigel. Installing the Television Set: Popular Discourses on Television and Domestic Space, 1948–1955. Camera Obscura [Internet]. Duke University Press; 1988 Jan 1;6(1 16):9–46. Available from: http://cameraobscura.dukejournals.org/content/6/1_16/9.citation
100.
Bignell J, Lacey S. Popular television drama: critical perspectives. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 2005.
101.
Hilmes M. The television history book. London: British Film Institute; 2003.
102.
Amy Holdsworth. ‘Television Resurrections’: Television and Memory. Cinema Journal [Internet]. University of Texas Press; 2008;47(3):137–144. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/30136121
103.
Jacobs J. The intimate screen: early British television drama [Internet]. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2664100
104.
Creeber G. Tele-visions: an introduction to studying television. London: BFI; 2006.
105.
Lacey S. Some Thoughts on Television History and Historiography: A British Perspective. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies [Internet]. 2006 Mar;1(1):3–12. Available from: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.7227/CST.1.1.3
106.
Moran J. Armchair nation: an intimate history of Britain in front of the TV [Internet]. London: Profile Books; 2013. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2876349
107.
Gillis S, Hollows J. Feminism, domesticity and popular culture. London: Routledge; 2008.
108.
Rachel Moseley and Helen Wheatley. Is Archiving a Feminist Issue? Historical Research and the Past, Present, and Future of Television Studies. Cinema Journal [Internet]. University of Texas Press; 2008;47(3):152–158. Available from: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/30136123
109.
Corner J. Popular television in Britain: studies in cultural history. London: BFI Publishing; 1991.
110.
Cannadine D, University of London. Institute of Historical Research. History and the media. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2004.
111.
Wallace, Richard. John Cura: Pioneer of the Television Archive. Journal of British Cinema & Television; [Internet]. 2016;13(1):99–120. Available from: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=112339087&site=eds-live&group=trial
112.
Bruno G. Atlas of emotion: journeys in art, architecture and film. New York: Verso; 2007.
113.
Kar Wai Wong. Grandmaster [videorecording].
114.
Gunning T. Moving Away from the Index: Cinema and the Impression of Reality. differences [Internet]. 2007 Jan 1;18(1):29–52. Available from: https://plu.mx/a/?ebsco-client=&doi=10.1215%2F10407391-2006-022
115.
Metz C. On the Impression of Reality in the Cinema. Film language: a semiotics of the cinema [Internet]. New York: Oxford University Press; 1974. p. 3–15. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=e12e9083-4f99-e711-80cb-005056af4099
116.
Bazin A, Gray H. What is cinema? [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2005. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2756261
117.
Crary J. Techniques of the observer: on vision and modernity in the nineteenth century. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 1990.
118.
Visual Studies Workshop. Afterimage. Rochester, N.Y.: Visual Studies Workshop;
119.
Elsaesser T. Film history as media archaeology: tracking digital cinema. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2016.
120.
Elsaesser T, Hagener M. Film theory: an introduction through the senses [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2010. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3076220
121.
Friedberg A. The virtual window: from Alberti to Microsoft [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2006. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2756081
122.
Kracauer S. Theory of film: the redemption of physical reality. New York: Oxford University Press; 1965.
123.
Manovich L. The language of new media [Internet]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press; 2001. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2851616
124.
Mulvey L. Death 24x a second: stillness and the moving image. London: Reaktion Books; 2006.
125.
Stam R. Film theory: an introduction. Malden, Mass: Blackwell; 2000.
126.
Fuller B, Green M, Gaiman N, Whittle R, Browning E, Schreiber P, FremantleMedia North America, StudioCanal Limited. American gods: Complete season one. [London]: StudioCanal; 2017.
127.
Sobchack VC. Carnal thoughts: embodiment and moving image culture [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2668155
128.
Brinkema E. The forms of the affects [Internet]. Durham: Duke University Press; 2014. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2750546
129.
Caldwell JT. Televisuality: style, crisis, and authority in American television [Internet]. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press; 1995. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2848118
130.
Elsaesser T, Hagener M. Film theory: an introduction through the senses [Internet]. New York: Routledge; 2010. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3076220
131.
Gorton K. Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion [Internet]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2009. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2796985
132.
Hemmings C. INVOKING AFFECT. Cultural Studies [Internet]. 2005 Sep;19(5):548–567. Available from: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/09502380500365473
133.
Marks LU. The skin of the film: intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2000.
134.
Ndalianis A. A Disturbing Feast for the Senses. Journal of Visual Culture. 2015 Dec;14(3):279–284.
135.
Plantinga CR. Moving viewers: American film and the spectator’s experience [Internet]. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2009. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2668563
136.
Senses of cinema. West Preston, Victoria, Australia: Senses of Cinema; Available from: http://sensesofcinema.com/issues/
137.
Shaviro S. The cinematic body [Internet]. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1993. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2914101
138.
Gregg M, Seigworth GJ. The affect theory reader [Internet]. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2010. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2747774
139.
Shouse E. Feeling, Emotion, Affect. M/C Journal [Internet]. 2005;8(6). Available from: http://www.journal.media-culture.org.au/0512/03-shouse.php
140.
Smit A. Visual Effects and Visceral Affect: ‘Tele-Affectivity’ and the Intensified Intimacy of Contemporary Television. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies [Internet]. 2013 Nov;8(3):92–107. Available from: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.7227/CST.8.3.8
141.
Williams, Linda. Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess. Film Quarterly (ARCHIVE) [Internet]. 44(4). Available from: https://0-search-proquest-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/223102636?accountid=14888
142.
Ozu Y, Noda K, Atsuta Y, Ryū C, Hara S, Sugimura H. The Noriko trilogy. London: Tartan Video; 2004.
143.
Late Spring (1949) [Internet]. FilmFour; Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/01BC3002?bcast=90546390
144.
Ozu Y, Noda K, Hara S, Tsukasa Y, Okada M, Satomi T, Shōchiku Kabushiki Kaisha. Late autumn. [S.I.]: Tartan Video; 2006.
145.
Bordwell D. Towards Intrinsic Norms. Ozu and the poetics of cinema [Internet]. London: BFI Publishing; 1988. p. 73–88. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=18aa4f69-049b-e811-80cd-005056af4099
146.
Burch N. Ozu Yasujiro. To the distant observer: form and meaning in the Japanese cinema [Internet]. London: Scolar Press; 1979. p. 154–185. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=76e8cecb-5720-e711-80c9-005056af4099
147.
Schrader P. Transcendental style in film: Ozu, Bresson, Dreyer. New York: Da Capo; 1988.
148.
Phillips A, Stringer J. Japanese cinema: texts and contexts. London: Routledge; 2007.
149.
Russell C. Classical Japanese cinema revisited [Internet]. New York: Continuum; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2824993
150.
Desser D. Ozu’s Tokyo story [Internet]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2668747
151.
Eleftheriotis D, Needham G. Asian cinemas: a reader and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2006.
152.
Richie D. Ozu. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1974.
153.
Ozu Y, Noda K. Tokyo Story: The Ozu/Noda Screenplay [Internet]. 2003. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tokyo-Story-Screenplay-16-Oct-2003-Paperback/dp/B013PREW8K/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1505207011&sr=8-1&keywords=Tokyo+Story%3A+The+Ozu%2FNoda+Screenplay
154.
Hitoto Y, Hsiao-hsien H, T’ien-Wen C, Miyajima H, Asano T, Hagiwara M, Shōchiku Kabushiki Kaisha, Asahi Shimbunsha, Sumitomo Corporation, Eisei Gekijo Co, Imagica Corp. Café Lumière. [England]: ICA Projects;
155.
Kiarostami A. Five Dedicated to Ozu [Internet]. 2003. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Five-Dedicated-Ozu-Region-NTSC/dp/B000QCU520/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1505207321&sr=8-1&keywords=Five+Dedicated+to+Ozu
156.
Wenders W. Tokyo-Ga [Internet]. 1985. Available from: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tokyo-Ga-Chishu-Ryu/dp/B00ESQBU6A/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1505207424&sr=8-1&keywords=Tokyo-Ga+wim+Wenders%2C+1985
157.
Jarmusch J, Koduh Y, Nagase M, Hawkins SJ, Channel Four (Great Britain). Mystery train. [London]: Channel 4; 1993.
158.
Denis C, Pesery B, Fargeau JP, Descas A, Diop M, Dogué N, Colin G, Caven I, Soudaine compagnie, Arte France cinéma (Firm), Pandora Film (Firm), Tindersticks (Musical group). 35 rhums: 35 shots of rum [Internet]. [London]: New Wave Films; 2008. Available from: https://learningonscreen.ac.uk/ondemand/index.php/prog/01407544?bcast=89004719
159.
Kore-eda H, Abe H, Natsukawa Y, Kiki K, Harada Y, You, New Wave Films. Still walking. [London]: New Wave Films; 2008.
160.
Bordwell D. ‘Watch Again! Look well! Look! (For Ozu)’ [Internet]. Observations on Film Art; 2013. Available from: http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2013/12/12/watch-again-look-well-look-for-ozu/
161.
Rosenbaum J. Is Ozu Slow? [Internet]. Senses of Cinema; 2000. Available from: http://sensesofcinema.com/2000/feature-articles/ozu-2/
162.
Nagib L. The Politics of Slowness and the Traps of Modernity. In: De Luca T, Jorge NB, editors. Slow cinema [Internet]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2016. p. 25–46. Available from: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8835f723-6e98-e711-80cb-005056af4099
163.
Graf A. The cinema of Wim Wenders: the celluloid highway. London: Wallflower Press; 2002.
164.
Udden J. No man an island: the cinema of Hou Hsiao-hsien. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2009.
165.
De Luca T, Jorge NB, editors. Slow cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2016.
166.
Gott M, Schilt T, Rascaroli L. Open roads, closed borders: the contemporary French-language road movie [Internet]. Bristol, UK: Intellect; 2013. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2659958
167.
Song Hwee LIM. Domesticating Time: Gendered Temporalities in Hou Hsiao-hsien’s Café Lumière. Frontiers of Literary Studies in China [Internet]. 2016;10(1):36–57. Available from: http://0-booksandjournals.brillonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/journals/10.3868/s010-005-016-0003-4
168.
Lee VPY. East Asian cinemas: regional flows and global transformations [Internet]. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan; 2011. Available from: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2702797
169.
De Luca T, Jorge NB, editors. Slow cinema. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2016.
170.
Stein W, Di Paolo M, editors. Ozu international: essays on the global influences of a Japanese auteur [Internet]. New York: Bloomsbury, An imprint of Bloombury Publishing Inc; 2015. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=752606&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
171.
Buckland W, editor. Hollywood puzzle films. New York: Routledge; 2014.
172.
Stein W, Di Paolo M, editors. Ozu international: essays on the global influences of a Japanese auteur [Internet]. New York: Bloomsbury, An imprint of Bloombury Publishing Inc; 2015. Available from: http://lib.myilibrary.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=752606&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
173.
Wu I fen. Remapping Ozu’s Tokyo? The Interplay between History and Memory in Hou Hsiao-Hsien’s Café Lumière. Asian Cinema [Internet]. 2008 Mar 1;19(1):172–181. Available from: http://0-www.ingentaconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/intellect/ac/2008/00000019/00000001/art00011
