[1]
Amy Holdsworth 2008. ‘Television Resurrections’: Television and Memory. Cinema Journal. 47, 3 (2008), 137–144.
[2]
Andrews, H. 2011. On the Grey Box: Broadcasting Experimental Film and Video on Channel 4’s. Visual Culture in Britain. 12, 2 (Jul. 2011), 203–218. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/14714787.2011.575262.
[3]
Andrews, H. 2014. Television and British cinema: convergence and divergence since 1990. Palgrave Macmillan.
[4]
Barr, C. and British Film Institute 1986. All our yesterdays: 90 years of British cinema. BFI Publishing.
[5]
Barr, C. and British Film Institute 1986. All our yesterdays: 90 years of British cinema. BFI Publishing.
[6]
Bazin, A. and Gray, H. 2005. What is cinema?. University of California Press.
[7]
Bennett, J. and Strange, N. 2011. Television as digital media. Duke University Press.
[8]
Bennett, J. and Strange, N. 2011. Television as digital media. Duke University Press.
[9]
Bennett, J. and Strange, N. 2011. Television as digital media. Duke University Press.
[10]
Bignell, J. and Lacey, S. 2005. Popular television drama: critical perspectives. Manchester University Press.
[11]
Bordwell, D. 1988. Towards Intrinsic Norms. Ozu and the poetics of cinema. BFI Publishing. 73–88.
[12]
Brinkema, E. 2014. The forms of the affects. Duke University Press.
[13]
Britton, A. and Grant, B.K. 2009. Britton on film: the complete film criticism of Andrew Britton. Wayne State University Press.
[14]
Browne, N. 1984. The political economy of the television (super) text. Quarterly Review of Film Studies. 9, 3 (Jun. 1984), 174–182. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208409361210.
[15]
Bruno, G. 2007. Atlas of emotion: journeys in art, architecture and film. Verso.
[16]
Brunsdon, C. 1991. Pedagogies of the feminine: feminist teaching and women’s genres. Screen. 32, 4 (Dec. 1991), 364–381. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/32.4.364.
[17]
Buckland, W. ed. 2014. Hollywood puzzle films. Routledge.
[18]
Buonanno, M. 2008. The age of television: experiences and theories. Intellect.
[19]
Buonanno, M. 2008. The age of television: experiences and theories. Intellect.
[20]
Burch, N. 1979. Ozu Yasujiro. To the distant observer: form and meaning in the Japanese cinema. Scolar Press. 154–185.
[21]
Caldwell, J.T. 1995. Excessive Style: The Crisis of Network Television. Televisuality: style, crisis, and authority in American television. Rutgers University Press. 3–31.
[22]
Caldwell, J.T. 1995. Televisuality: style, crisis, and authority in American television. Rutgers University Press.
[23]
Caldwell, J.T. and Everett, A. 2003. New media: theories and practices of digitextuality. Routledge.
[24]
Cameron, I. 1992. The Movie book of film noir. Studio Vista.
[25]
Cannadine, D. and University of London. Institute of Historical Research 2004. History and the media. Palgrave Macmillan.
[26]
Carroll, N. 2009. On criticism. Routledge.
[27]
Clayton, A. and Klevan, A. 2011. Introduction: The language and style of film criticism. The language and style of film criticism. Routledge.
[28]
Clayton, A. and Klevan, A. 2011. The language and style of film criticism. Routledge.
[29]
Coen, J. et al. 2004. Fargo. MGM Home Entertainment.
[30]
Conversations with Jon Halliday: 1997. https://www.amazon.co.uk/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Dstripbooks&field-keywords=halliday++Conversations+with+Jon+Halliday&rh=n%3A266239%2Ck%3Ahalliday++Conversations+with+Jon+Halliday.
[31]
Corner, J. 1999. Critical ideas in television studies. Clarendon Press.
[32]
Corner, J. 1999. Critical ideas in television studies. Clarendon Press.
[33]
Corner, J. 1991. Popular television in Britain: studies in cultural history. BFI Publishing.
[34]
Corner, J. 1991. Popular television in Britain: studies in cultural history. BFI Publishing.
[35]
Corner, John 2003. Finding data, reading patterns, telling stories: issues in the historiography of television. Media, Culture & Society;. 25, 2 (2003).
[36]
Couldry, N. and McCarthy, A. 2004. MediaSpace: place, scale, and culture in a media age. Routledge.
[37]
Crary, J. 1990. Techniques of the observer: on vision and modernity in the  nineteenth century. MIT Press.
[38]
Creeber, G. 2006. Tele-visions: an introduction to studying television. BFI.
[39]
DAVID BORDWELL 2011. NEVER THE TWAIN Why can’t cinephiles and academics just get along? SHALL MEET. Film Comment. 47, 3 (2011), 38–41.
[40]
De Luca, T. and Jorge, N.B. eds. 2016. Slow cinema. Edinburgh University Press.
[41]
De Luca, T. and Jorge, N.B. eds. 2016. Slow cinema. Edinburgh University Press.
[42]
Denis, C. et al. 2008. 35 rhums: 35 shots of rum. New Wave Films.
[43]
Desser, D. 1997. Ozu’s Tokyo story. Cambridge University Press.
[44]
Eleftheriotis, D. and Needham, G. 2006. Asian cinemas: a reader and guide. Edinburgh University Press.
[45]
Ellis, J. 1992. Visible fictions: cinema, television, video. Routledge.
[46]
Ellis, J. 1992. Visible fictions: cinema, television, video. Routledge.
[47]
Elsaesser, T. 2016. Film history as media archaeology: tracking digital cinema. Amsterdam University Press.
[48]
Elsaesser, T. and Hagener, M. 2010. Film theory: an introduction through the senses. Routledge.
[49]
Elsaesser, T. and Hagener, M. 2010. Film theory: an introduction through the senses. Routledge.
[50]
Evans, V.L. 2017. Douglas Sirk, aesthetic modernism and the culture of modernity. Edinburgh University Press.
[51]
Fassbinder, R.W. et al. 2003. Ali, fear eats the soul. Criterion Collection.
[52]
Fiske, J. 2011. Television culture. Routledge.
[53]
Friedberg, A. 2006. The virtual window: from Alberti to Microsoft. MIT Press.
[54]
Fuller, B. et al. 2017. American gods: Complete season one. StudioCanal.
[55]
Geller, M. and New Museum of Contemporary Art (New York, N.Y.) From receiver to remote control: the TV set. New Museum of Contemporary Art.
[56]
Geraghty, C. and Lusted, D. 1998. The television studies book. Arnold.
[57]
Gibbs, J. and Pye, D. 2005. Style and meaning: studies in the detailed analysis of film. Manchester University Press.
[58]
Gibbs, J. and Pye, D. 2005. Style and meaning: studies in the detailed analysis of film. Manchester University Press.
[59]
Gibbs, J. and Pye, D. 2005. Style and meaning: studies in the detailed analysis of film. Manchester University Press.
[60]
Gibbs, J.E. 2002. Mise-en-scène: film style and interpretation. Wallflower.
[61]
Gillis, S. and Hollows, J. 2008. Feminism, domesticity and popular culture. Routledge.
[62]
Goerge Toles 1999. Obvious mysteries in Fargo. Michigan Quarterly Review. 38, 4 (1999).
[63]
Gorton, K. 2009. Media audiences: television, meaning and emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
[64]
Gott, M. et al. 2013. Open roads, closed borders: the contemporary French-language road movie. Intellect.
[65]
Graf, A. 2002. The cinema of Wim Wenders: the celluloid highway. Wallflower Press.
[66]
Grainge, P. 2011. Ephemeral media: transitory screen culture from television to YouTube. BFI.
[67]
Gregg, M. and Seigworth, G.J. 2010. The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.
[68]
Gumbrecht, H.U. and Pfeiffer, K.L. 1994. Materialities of communication. Stanford University Press.
[69]
Gunning, T. 2007. Moving Away from the Index: Cinema and the Impression of Reality. differences. 18, 1 (Jan. 2007), 29–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/10407391-2006-022.
[70]
Hartley, J. 1999. Uses of television. Routledge.
[71]
Hemmings, C. 2005. INVOKING AFFECT. Cultural Studies. 19, 5 (Sep. 2005), 548–567. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380500365473.
[72]
Hills, M. 2007. FROM THE BOX IN THE CORNER TO THE BOX SET ON THE SHELF. New Review of Film and Television Studies. 5, 1 (Apr. 2007), 41–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/17400300601140167.
[73]
Hilmes, M. 2003. The television history book. British Film Institute.
[74]
Hitoto, Y. et al. Café Lumière. ICA Projects.
[75]
Is Ozu Slow? 2000. http://sensesofcinema.com/2000/feature-articles/ozu-2/.
[76]
Jacobs, J. 2001. Issues of judgement and value in television studies. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 4, 4 (Dec. 2001), 427–447. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/136787790100400404.
[77]
Jacobs, J. 2000. The intimate screen: early British television drama. Oxford University Press.
[78]
Jarmusch, J. et al. 1993. Mystery train. Channel 4.
[79]
Johnson, C. 2012. Branding television. Routledge.
[80]
Kaplan, E.A. 1983. Regarding television: critical approaches : an anthology. University Publications of America.
[81]
Kar Wai Wong Grandmaster [videorecording].
[82]
Kiarostami, A. 2003. Five Dedicated to Ozu.
[83]
Klinger, B. 2006. Beyond the multiplex: cinema, new technologies, and the home. University of California Press.
[84]
Klinger, B. 1994. The Many Faces of Melodrama. Melodrama and meaning: history, culture, and the films of Douglas  Sirk. Indiana University Press. 11–20.
[85]
Kore-eda, H. et al. 2008. Still walking. New Wave Films.
[86]
Kracauer, S. 1965. Theory of film: the redemption of physical reality. Oxford University Press.
[87]
Lacey, S. 2006. Some Thoughts on Television History and Historiography: A British Perspective. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies. 1, 1 (Mar. 2006), 3–12. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.1.1.3.
[88]
Landy, M. 1991. Imitations of life: a reader on film & television melodrama. Wayne State University Press.
[89]
Lee, V.P.Y. 2011. East Asian cinemas: regional flows and global transformations. Palgrave Macmillan.
[90]
Lehman, P. 1990. Close viewings: an anthology of new film criticism. Florida State University Press.
[91]
Luhr, W. 2004. The Coen brothers’ Fargo. Cambridge University Press.
[92]
Lury, K. 2005. Interpreting television. Hodder Arnold.
[93]
Lynn Spigel 1988. Installing the Television Set: Popular Discourses on Television and Domestic Space, 1948–1955. Camera Obscura. 6, 1 16 (Jan. 1988), 9–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-6-1_16-9                                  10.1215/02705346-6-1_16-9.
[94]
Lynn Spigel 1988. Installing the Television Set: Popular Discourses on Television and Domestic Space, 1948–1955. Camera Obscura. 6, 1 16 (Jan. 1988), 9–46. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1215/02705346-6-1_16-9                                  10.1215/02705346-6-1_16-9.
[95]
Making Feminist Points: https://feministkilljoys.com/2013/09/11/making-feminist-points/.
[96]
Manovich, L. 2001. The language of new media. MIT Press.
[97]
Marks, L.U. 2000. The skin of the film: intercultural cinema, embodiment, and the senses. Duke University Press.
[98]
Martin, A. 2012. Guess-Work: Scarlet Street. Movie: A Journal of Film Criticism. 3, (2012).
[99]
Martin, A. 2014. Mise en scène and film style: from classical Hollywood to new media art. Palgrave Macmillan.
[100]
McDonald, K. and Smith-Rowsey, D. eds. 2016. The Netflix effect: technology and entertainment in the 21st century. Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing Inc.
[101]
McLoone, M. and Hill, J. 1996. Big picture, small screen: the relations between film and television. University of Luton Press.
[102]
Mellencamp, P. 1990. Logics of television: essays in cultural criticism. Indiana University Press.
[103]
Metz, C. 1974. On the Impression of Reality in the Cinema. Film language: a semiotics of the cinema. Oxford University Press. 3–15.
[104]
Mittell, J. 2015. Complex TV: the poetics of contemporary television storytelling. New York University Press.
[105]
Moran, J. 2013. Armchair nation: an intimate history of Britain in front of the TV. Profile Books.
[106]
Morley, D. 1988. Family television: cultural power and domestic leisure. Routledge.
[107]
Mulvey, L. 2006. Death 24x a second: stillness and the moving image. Reaktion Books.
[108]
Mulvey, L. 2006. Death 24x a second: stillness and the moving image. Reaktion Books.
[109]
Mulvey, L. 2008. Visual and other pleasures. Palgrave Macmillan.
[110]
Nagib, L. 2016. The Politics of Slowness and the Traps of Modernity. Slow cinema. T. De Luca and N.B. Jorge, eds. Edinburgh University Press. 25–46.
[111]
Ndalianis, A. 2015. A Disturbing Feast for the Senses. Journal of Visual Culture. 14, 3 (Dec. 2015), 279–284. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1470412915607928.
[112]
Newcomb, H.M. and Hirsch, P.M. 1983. Television as a cultural forum: Implications for research∗. Quarterly Review of Film Studies. 8, 3 (Jun. 1983), 45–55. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10509208309361170.
[113]
Niessen, N. 2011. Lives of cinema: against its ‘death’. Screen. 52, 3 (Sep. 2011), 307–326. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1093/screen/hjr023.
[114]
Nixon, S. 2017. Life in the kitchen: Television advertising, the housewife and domestic modernity in Britain, 1955–1969. Contemporary British History. 31, 1 (Jan. 2017), 69–90. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/13619462.2016.1245619.
[115]
Ozu, Y. et al. 2006. Late autumn. Tartan Video.
[116]
Ozu, Y. et al. 2004. The Noriko trilogy. Tartan Video.
[117]
Ozu, Y. and Noda, K. 2003. Tokyo Story: The Ozu/Noda Screenplay.
[118]
Perkins, V.F. 1972. Film as film: understanding and judging movies. Penguin.
[119]
Perkins, V.F. 1972. "How” is "What”. Film as film: understanding and judging movies. Penguin. 116–133.
[120]
Pertierra, A.C. and Turner, G. 2013. Locating television: zones of consumption. Routledge.
[121]
Phillips, A. and Stringer, J. 2007. Japanese cinema: texts and contexts. Routledge.
[122]
Plantinga, C.R. 2009. Moving viewers: American film and the spectator’s experience. University of California Press.
[123]
Pye, D. et al. 2007. Close-up 02. Wallflower.
[124]
Rachel Moseley and Helen Wheatley 2008. Is Archiving a Feminist Issue? Historical Research and the Past, Present, and Future of Television Studies. Cinema Journal. 47, 3 (2008), 152–158.
[125]
Richie, D. 1974. Ozu. University of California Press.
[126]
Rodan, D. 2009. Large, sleek, slim, stylish flat screens: Privatized space and the televisual experience. Continuum. 23, 3 (Jun. 2009), 367–382. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310902884050.
[127]
Rodowick, D.N. 2007. The virtual life of film. Harvard University Press.
[128]
Russell, C. 2011. Classical Japanese cinema revisited. Continuum.
[129]
Schrader, P. 1988. Transcendental style in film: Ozu, Bresson, Dreyer. Da Capo.
[130]
Sedgwick, E.K. 2003. Touching feeling: affect, pedagogy, performativity. Duke University Press.
[131]
Shaviro, S. 1993. The cinematic body. University of Minnesota Press.
[132]
Shouse, E. 2005. Feeling, Emotion, Affect. M/C Journal. 8, 6 (2005).
[133]
Silverstone, R. 1994. Television and everyday life. Routledge.
[134]
Smit, A. 2013. Visual Effects and Visceral Affect: ‘Tele-Affectivity’ and the Intensified Intimacy of Contemporary Television. Critical Studies in Television: The International Journal of Television Studies. 8, 3 (Nov. 2013), 92–107. DOI:https://doi.org/10.7227/CST.8.3.8.
[135]
Sobchack, V.C. 2004. Carnal thoughts: embodiment and moving image culture. University of California Press.
[136]
Song Hwee LIM 2016. Domesticating Time: Gendered Temporalities in Hou Hsiao-hsien’s Café Lumière. Frontiers of Literary Studies in China. 10, 1 (2016), 36–57. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3868/s010-005-016-0003-4.
[137]
Sontang, S. 1967. Against Interpretation. Against interpretation, and other essays. Eyre & Spottiswoode. 3–14.
[138]
Spacey, K. House of cards [videorecording].
[139]
Spigel, L. 1992. Make room for TV: television and the family ideal in postwar America. University of Chicago Press.
[140]
Spigel, L. 2009. My TV Studies . . . Now Playing on a You Tube Site Near You. Television & New Media. 10, 1 (Jan. 2009), 149–153. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476408325895.
[141]
Spigel, L. and Olsson, J. 2004. Television after TV: essays on a medium in transition. Duke University Press.
[142]
Spigel, L. and Olsson, J. 2004. Television after TV: essays on a medium in transition. Duke University Press.
[143]
Stam, R. 2000. Film theory: an introduction. Blackwell.
[144]
Stam, R. 2000. Film theory: an introduction. Blackwell.
[145]
Stein, W. and Di Paolo, M. eds. 2015. Ozu international: essays on the global influences of a Japanese auteur. Bloomsbury, An imprint of Bloombury Publishing Inc.
[146]
Stein, W. and Di Paolo, M. eds. 2015. Ozu international: essays on the global influences of a Japanese auteur. Bloomsbury, An imprint of Bloombury Publishing Inc.
[147]
Stokes, J.C. 1999. On screen rivals: cinema and television in the United States and  Britain. Macmillan.
[148]
The Cine-Files: http://issue4.thecine-files.com/.
[149]
Thomas, D. 2001. Reading Hollywood: spaces and meanings in American film. Wallflower.
[150]
Tichi, C. 1991. Electronic hearth: creating an American television culture. Oxford University Press.
[151]
Tokyo-Ga: 1985. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Tokyo-Ga-Chishu-Ryu/dp/B00ESQBU6A/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1505207424&sr=8-1&keywords=Tokyo-Ga+wim+Wenders%2C+1985.
[152]
Turner, G. and Tay, J. 2009. Television studies after tv: understanding television in the post-broadcast era. Routledge.
[153]
Udden, J. 2009. No man an island: the cinema of Hou Hsiao-hsien. Hong Kong University Press.
[154]
Visual Studies Workshop Afterimage.
[155]
Wallace, Richard 2016. John Cura: Pioneer of the Television Archive. Journal of British Cinema & Television;. 13, 1 (2016), 99–120.
[156]
‘Watch Again! Look well! Look! (For Ozu)’: 2013. http://www.davidbordwell.net/blog/2013/12/12/watch-again-look-well-look-for-ozu/.
[157]
Wheatley, H. 2007. Re-viewing television history: critical issues in television historiography. I. B. Tauris.
[158]
Willemen, P. and British Film Institute 1994. Looks and frictions: essays in cultural studies and film theory. Indiana University Press.
[159]
Williams, Linda Film Bodies: Gender, Genre, and Excess. Film Quarterly (ARCHIVE). 44, 4.
[160]
Williams, R. 1990. Chapter 4: ‘Programming: distribution and flow’. Television: technology and cultural form. Routledge. 78–118.
[161]
Williams, R. and Williams, E. 1990. Television: technology and cultural form. Routledge.
[162]
Wilson, G.M. 1986. Narration in light: studies in cinematic point of view. Johns Hopkins University Press.
[163]
Wood, H. 2007. Television is happening. European Journal of Cultural Studies. 10, 4 (Nov. 2007), 485–506. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407081956.
[164]
Wood, R. 2006. Personal views: explorations in film. Wayne State University Press.
[165]
Wu, I. 2008. Remapping Ozu’s Tokyo? The Interplay between History and Memory in Hou Hsiao-Hsien’s Café Lumière. Asian Cinema. 19, 1 (Mar. 2008), 172–181. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1386/ac.19.1.172_1.
[166]
Wyman, J. et al. 2007. All that heaven allows. Universal Pictures Video.
[167]
All That Heaven Allows (1955). FilmFour.
[168]
Far from Heaven (2002). FilmFour.
[169]
Grayson Perry: Divided Britain. Channel 4.
[170]
Late Spring (1949). FilmFour.
[171]
1990. Please read: V.F. Perkins, ‘Must We Say What They Mean? Film Criticism and Interpretation’. Movie. 34, (1990), 1–6.
[172]
Scarlet Street (1945). BBC2 England.
[173]
Senses of cinema.