[1]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2808874
[2]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[3]
K. Hargreaves, ‘Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination’, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 261–283, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00492.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00492.x
[4]
M. C. Inhorn, ‘Masturbation, Semen Collection and Men’s IVF Experiences: Anxieties in the Muslim World’, Body & Society, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 37–53, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1177/1357034X07082251. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1177/1357034X07082251
[5]
M. Nash, Ed., Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.
[6]
M. Nash, Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[7]
K. Throsby, When IVF fails: feminism, infertility, and the negotiation of normality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2341631
[8]
K. Throsby, When IVF fails: feminism, infertility and the negotiation of normality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42678&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[9]
R. Almeling, ‘“Why do you want to be a donor?”: gender and the production of altruism in egg and sperm donation’, New Genetics and Society, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 143–157, Aug. 2006, doi: 10.1080/14636770600855184. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/14636770600855184
[10]
Almeling, Rene, ‘Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material’, American Sociological Review, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 319–340 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/218831869?accountid=14888
[11]
R. Almeling, Sex cells: the medical market for eggs and sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2011.
[12]
R. Arditti, R. D. Klein, and S. Minden, Test-tube women: what future for motherhood? London: Pandora, 1989.
[13]
L. I. A. Birke, G. Vines, and S. Himmelweit, Tomorrow’s child: reproductive technologies in the 90s. London: Virago, 1990.
[14]
M. Nash, Ed., Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[15]
M. Nash, Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[16]
N. R. Cahn, The new kinship: constructing donor-conceived families, vol. Families, law, and society series. New York: New York University Press, 2013.
[17]
C. Lewiecki-Wilson and J. Cellio, Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge, 1st ed., vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166
[18]
C. Lewiecki-Wilson and J. Cellio, Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge, 1st ed., vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166
[19]
G. Corea, The mother machine: reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. London: Women’s Press, 1988.
[20]
L. Culley, N. Hudson, and F. Van Rooij, Eds., Marginalized reproduction: ethnicity, infertility and reproductive technologies, vol. Earthscan science in society series. London: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=217074&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[21]
L. Culley, N. Hudson, and F. Van Rooij, Marginalized reproduction: ethnicity, infertility and reproductive technologies, vol. Science in society series. London: Earthscan, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=217074&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[22]
K. R. Daniels, G. M. Lewis, and W. Gillett, ‘Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: The nature of couples’ decision-making’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 40, no. 9, pp. 1213–1220, May 1995, doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00251-N.
[23]
E. Denny, ‘Liberation or oppression? radical feminism and in vitro fertilisation.’, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 62–80, Jan. 1994, doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347010. [Online]. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347010/full
[24]
J. Edwards, Technologies of procreation: kinship in the age of assisted conception, 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1999.
[25]
D. Farquhar, The other machine: discourse and reproductive technologies, vol. Thinking gender. New York: Routledge, 1996.
[26]
S. Franklin, Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=180137
[27]
S. Franklin, Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=32286&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[28]
J. M. Goldfarb, Ed., Third-party reproduction: a comprehensive guide. New York: Springer, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1
[29]
V. M. Grace, K. R. Daniels, and W. Gillett, ‘The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 301–314, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.sciencedirect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0277953607004819?via%3Dihub
[30]
L. Handwerker, ‘Social and Ethical Implications of In Vitro Fertilization in Contemporary China’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, vol. 4, no. 03, Jun. 1995, doi: 10.1017/S0963180100006101.
[31]
M. C. Inhorn and F. van Balen, Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 2002.
[32]
F. A. Hanson, ‘Donor Insemination: Eugenic and Feminist Implications’, Medical Anthropology Quarterly, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 287–311, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/649581?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[33]
V. Hartouni, Cultural conceptions: on reproductive technologies and the remaking of life. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
[34]
K. Silva, Feminist erasures: challenging backlash culture. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian, 2015.
[35]
K. Mendes and K. Silva, Feminist erasures: challenging backlash culture. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137454928
[36]
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team, ‘HFEA Code of Practice: Guidance Note 12. Egg sharing arrangements (version 2.0)’. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF [Online]. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/499.html
[37]
K. Horsey, Ed., Revisiting the regulation of human fertilisation and embryology, vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315767895
[38]
K. Horsey, Revisiting the regulation of human fertilisation and embryology, vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. London: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315767895
[39]
P. Wade, Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics, vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books, 2007.
[40]
M. C. Inhorn, Local babies, global science: gender, religion, and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge, 2003.
[41]
M. C. Inhorn, Ed., Reconceiving the second sex: men, masculinity, and reproduction, vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009.
[42]
M. C. Inhorn, M. la C. Mosegaard, T. Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, and H. Oppenheimer, Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity, and Reproduction, vol. Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780857455369
[43]
M. C. Inhorn and S. Tremayne, Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives, vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books, 2012.
[44]
M. C. Inhorn and S. Tremayne, Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives, vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books, 2012.
[45]
M. Kirkman, ‘Egg and Embryo Donation and the Meaning of Motherhood’, Women & Health, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1–18, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1300/J013v38n02_01. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1300/J013v38n02_01
[46]
G. Corea and International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women, Man-made women: how new reproductive technologies affect women, 1st Midland book ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
[47]
J. Maher, ‘Something Else Besides a Father’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 853–867, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2013.831369. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/14680777.2013.831369
[48]
L. Meerabeau, ‘Husbands’ participation in fertility treatment: they also serve who only stand and wait.’, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 396–410, Sep. 1991, doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.ep10492399.
[49]
L. J. Moore, Sperm counts: overcome by man’s most precious fluid, vol. Intersections. New York: New York University Press, 2007.
[50]
M. Nahman, ‘Materializing Israeliness: Difference and mixture in transnational ova donation’, Science as Culture, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 199–213, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1080/09505430600890669. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/09505430600890669
[51]
M. Nahman, ‘Nodes of Desire: Romanian Egg Sellers, `Dignity’ and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 65–82, May 2008, doi: 10.1177/1350506807088068. [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/1350506807088068
[52]
M. R. Nahman, Extractions: an ethnography of reproductive tourism, vol. Globath ethics series. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291752
[53]
M. R. Nahman, Extractions: An ethnography of reproductive tourism, vol. Global ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291752
[54]
A. Oakley, Essays on women, medicine and health, vol. Edinburgh education and society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 1993.
[55]
N. Pfeffer, The stork and the syringe: a political history of reproductive medicine, vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1993.
[56]
Anne Phillips, ‘It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It: Bodies as Objects and Property’, Political Theory, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 724–748, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41502590?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[57]
A. Phillips, Our bodies, whose property? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685
[58]
A. Phillips, Our bodies, whose property? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685
[59]
M. Richards, G. Pennings, and J. B. Appleby, Reproductive donation: practice, policy, and bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
[60]
M. Richards, G. Pennings, and J. B. Appleby, Eds., Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026390
[61]
D. E. Roberts, Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty, 1st Vintage ed. New York: Vintage, 1999.
[62]
E. F. S. Roberts, God’s laboratory: assisted reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2012.
[63]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012.
[64]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
[65]
A. R. Saetnan, N. Oudshoorn, and M. S. M. Kirejczyk, Bodies of technology: women’s involvement with reproductive medicine, vol. Women and health : cultural and social perspectives. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 2000.
[66]
R. Shaw, ‘Rethinking Reproductive Gifts as Body Projects’, Sociology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 11–28, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0038038507084823.
[67]
P. Spallone and D. L. Steinberg, Made to order: the myth of reproductive and genetic progress, vol. The Athene series. Oxford: Pergamon, 1987.
[68]
P. Spallone, Beyond conception: the new politics of reproduction, vol. Women in society. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1989.
[69]
M. Stacey, Changing human reproduction: social science perspectives. London: Sage, 1992.
[70]
M. Stanworth, Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine, vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987.
[71]
D. L. Steinberg, Bodies in glass: genetics, eugenics, embryo ethics. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997.
[72]
C. Thompson, Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technologies, vol. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT, 2005.
[73]
K. Throsby, ‘“It’s Different for Men”: Masculinity and IVF’, Men and Masculinities, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 330–348, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1177/1097184X03260958.
[74]
K. Throsby, ‘The unaltered body?: Rethinking the body when IVF fails’, Science Studies, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 77–97, 2004.
[75]
P. Wade, Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics, vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books, 2007.
[76]
Morgan, D., ‘Surrogacy Issue: Who Is the Other Mother, The’, International Journal of Law and the Family, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 386–412, 1994 [Online]. Available: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlpf8&id=396
[77]
‘Fertility Fairness’. [Online]. Available: http://www.fertilityfairness.co.uk/
[78]
‘FINRRAGE’. [Online]. Available: http://www.finrrage.org/
[79]
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team, ‘HFEA - Fertility, Infertility, IVF, Embryo research -’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/
[80]
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team, ‘Donation reviews and consultations - HFEA’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/513.html
[81]
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team, ‘National Donation Strategy Group’. [Online]. Available: http://www.altrui.co.uk/2012/05/03/hfea-national-donation-strategy-group/
[82]
‘National Gamete Donation Trust’. [Online]. Available: http://www.ngdt.co.uk/
[83]
‘NICE 2013 Guideline on Fertility’. [Online]. Available: http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG156
[84]
‘One at a Time’, 2014. [Online]. Available: http://www.oneatatime.org.uk/
[85]
‘Hands Off Our Ovaries’. [Online]. Available: http://www.handsoffourovaries.com/
[86]
K. Bergman, R. J. Rubio, R.-J. Green, and E. Padrón, ‘Gay Men Who Become Fathers via Surrogacy: The Transition to Parenthood’, Journal of GLBT Family Studies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 111–141, May 2010, doi: 10.1080/15504281003704942. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/15504281003704942
[87]
‘COTS UK (surrogacy support group)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/
[88]
A. Phillips, Our bodies, whose property? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SOur%20bodies%2C%20whose%20propertyPw%3D%3D__Ff%3Afacetmediatype%3Ah%3Ah%3AE-Book%3A%3A__Orightresult__U__X0?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
[89]
A. Phillips, Our bodies, whose property? Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685
[90]
H. Ragone, ‘Of Likeness and Difference: How Race Is Being Transformed by Gestational Surrogacy’, in Ideologies and technologies of motherhood: race, class, sexuality, nationalism, New York: Routledge, 2000, pp. 56–75 [Online]. Available: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/so/so231/ragone_h_2000.pdf
[91]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[92]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[93]
M. Atwood, The handmaid’s tale. London: Vintage, 1996.
[94]
A. BAILEY, ‘Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy’, Hypatia, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 715–741, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41328877
[95]
H. Baslington, ‘Anxiety overflow’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 675–684, Nov. 1996, doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00088-X. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.sciencedirect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S027753959600088X?via%3Dihub
[96]
S. Earle, C. Komaromy, and L. L. Layne, Understanding reproductive loss: perspectives on life, death and fertility. Farham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2655848
[97]
S. Earle, C. Komaromy, and L. L. Layne, Understanding reproductive loss: perspectives on life, death and fertility. Farham: Ashgate, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781409428114
[98]
A. Burfoot, ‘In-appropriation — a critique of Proceed With Care’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 499–506, Jul. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0277-5395(95)80039-R. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.sciencedirect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/science/article/pii/027753959580039R?via%3Dihub
[99]
M. Nash, Ed., Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[100]
M. Nash, Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[101]
R. Cook, S. D. Sclater, and F. Kaganas, Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Oxford: Hart, 2003.
[102]
R. Cook, S. D. Sclater, and F. Kaganas, Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Oxford: Hart, 2003.
[103]
G. Corea, The mother machine: reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. London: Women’s Press, 1988.
[104]
S. DasGupta and S. D. Dasgupta, Eds., Globalization and transnational surrogacy in India: outsourcing life. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books, 2014.
[105]
L. S. Kauffman, American feminist thought at century’s end: a reader. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1993.
[106]
L. S. Kauffman, American feminist thought at century’s end: a reader. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1993.
[107]
D. Farquhar, The other machine: discourse and reproductive technologies, vol. Thinking gender. New York: Routledge, 1996.
[108]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[109]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[110]
J. Greenfield and S. Jennings, ‘From surrogacy to contested adoption: what went wrong?’, Adoption and Fostering, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 34–40, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://0-aaf.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/19/4/34.abstract
[111]
V. Hartouni, Cultural conceptions: on reproductive technologies and the remaking of life. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.
[112]
A. Hochschild, ‘Emotional Life on the Market Frontier’, Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 21–33, Aug. 2011 [Online]. Available: https://0-www-jstor-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41288597?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
[113]
E. M. Jackson, Regulating reproduction: law, technology and autonomy. Oxford: Hart, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2558274
[114]
E. Jackson, Regulating reproduction: law, technology, and autonomy. Oxford: Hart Pub, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000222.html
[115]
R. G. Lee and D. Morgan, Human fertilisation and embryology: regulating the reproductive revolution. London: Blackstone, 2001.
[116]
R. G. Lee and D. Morgan, Human fertilisation and embryology: regulating the reproductive revolution. London: Blackstone, 2001.
[117]
S. Markens, Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007.
[118]
W. Norton, N. Hudson, and L. Culley, ‘Gay men seeking surrogacy to achieve parenthood’, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 271–279, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.016. [Online]. Available: http://www.rbmojournal.com/article/S1472-6483(13)00180-6/fulltext
[119]
A. Pande, ‘Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker’, Signs, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 969–992, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/651043?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[120]
C. Pateman, The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity, 1988 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3442629
[121]
A. Phillips, ‘It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It: Bodies as Objects and Property’, Political Theory, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 724–748, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41502590?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[122]
H. Kuhse and P. Singer, Bioethics: an anthology, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[123]
H. Ragoné, Surrogate motherhood: conception in the heart, vol. Institutional structures of feeling. Boulder: Westview Press, 1994.
[124]
L. L. Layne, Transformative motherhood: on giving and getting in a consumer culture. New York: New York University Press, 1999.
[125]
D. W. Riggs and C. Due, ‘"The Contented Faces of a Unique Australian Family”: Privilege and Vulnerability in News Media Reporting of Offshore Surrogacy Arrangements’, Feminist Media Studies, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 869–872, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1080/14680777.2014.952874. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/14680777.2014.952874
[126]
D. E. Roberts, Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty, 1st Vintage ed. New York: Vintage, 1999.
[127]
R. Rowland, Living laboratories: women and reproductive technology. London: Lime Tree, 1992.
[128]
M. Hirsch and E. F. Keller, Conflicts in feminism. New York: Routledge, 1990.
[129]
K. Trimmings and P. R. Beaumont, Eds., International surrogacy arrangements: legal regulation at the international level, vol. Studies in private international law. Oxford United Kingdom: Hart Publishing, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2749248
[130]
K. Trimmings and P. Beaumont, International surrogacy arrangements: Legal regulation at the international level. Hart Publishing Ltd, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000810.html
[131]
F. W. Twine, Outsourcing the womb: race, class, and gestational surrogacy in a global market, vol. Framing 21st century social issues. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015.
[132]
A. van Niekerk and L. van Zyl, ‘The Ethics of Surrogacy: Women’s Reproductive Labour’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 345–349, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27717666?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[133]
L. van Zyl and A. van Niekerk, ‘Interpretations, Perspectives and Intentions in Surrogate Motherhood’, Journal of Medical Ethics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 404–409, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27718578?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[134]
K. Vora, ‘Limits of "Labor”: Accounting for Affect and the Biological in Transnational Surrogacy and Service Work’, South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 681–700, Spring 2012, doi: 10.1215/00382876-1724138 10.1215/00382876-1724138. [Online]. Available: http://0-saq.dukejournals.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/111/4/681
[135]
M. Stanworth, Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine, vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987.
[136]
M. Stanworth, Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine, vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell, 1987.
[137]
‘Full Service, Worldwide Surrogate-Parenting Agency | Circle Surrogacy’. [Online]. Available: http://www.circlesurrogacy.com/
[138]
‘cots’. [Online]. Available: http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/
[139]
‘Sweden: EWL members campaign against surrogate motherhood - European Women’s Lobby’. [Online]. Available: http://www.womenlobby.org/Sweden-EWL-members-campaign-against-surrogate-motherhood
[140]
‘Find Surrogate Mothers’. [Online]. Available: http://www.findsurrogatemother.com/
[141]
‘FINRRAGE’. [Online]. Available: http://www.finrrage.org/
[142]
‘OPTS - The Organization of Parents Through Surrogacy’. [Online]. Available: http://www.opts.com/
[143]
‘Surrogacy UK’. [Online]. Available: http://www.surrogacyuk.org/
[144]
‘Successful Parents India | Surrogacy Agency | New Delhi, India’. [Online]. Available: http://www.findsurrogatemother.com/surrogacy-agencies/successful-parents-india-new-delhi-india_870
[145]
C. Lewiecki-Wilson and J. Cellio, Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge, 1st ed., vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2011.
[146]
C. Lewiecki-Wilson and J. Cellio, Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge, 1st ed., vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166
[147]
‘Mitochondria Replacement Consultations: Advice to Government’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/HFEA_Authority_meeting_March_2013_-_Mitchondria_report.pdf
[148]
T. Krahn and S. Wong, ‘Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and reproductive autonomy’, Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 19, pp. 34–42, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60275-1.
[149]
C. Roberts and K. Throsby, ‘Paid to share: IVF patients, eggs and stem cell research’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 159–169, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.011.
[150]
S. Sui and M. Sleeboom-Faulkner, ‘Choosing offspring: prenatal genetic testing for thalassaemia and the production of a “saviour sibling” in China’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 167–175, Feb. 2010, doi: 10.1080/13691050902914110.
[151]
L. B. Andrews, The clone age: adventures in the new world of reproductive technology, FirstOwl Books edition. New York: Henry Holt, 2000.
[152]
K. ATKIN, ‘Ethnicity and the Politics of the New Genetics: Principles and Engagement’, Ethnicity & Health, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 91–109, May 2003, doi: 10.1080/13557850303561.
[153]
H. Kuhse and P. Singer, Bioethics: an anthology, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[154]
D. DeGrazia, Creation ethics: genetics, reproduction, and quality of life. New York: Oxford University Press, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389630.001.0001
[155]
R. Deech and A. Smajdor, From IVF to immortality: controversy in the era of reproductive technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
[156]
R. Deech and A. Smajdor, From IVF to immortality: controversy in the era of reproductive technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219780.001.0001
[157]
K. Ehrich, C. Williams, and B. Farsides, ‘The embryo as moral work object: PGD/IVF staff views and experiences’, Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 772–787, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01083.x.
[158]
E. Ettorre, ‘Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body: `Please Doctor, may I have a Normal Baby?’’, Sociology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 403–420, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1177/S0038038500000262.
[159]
S. Franklin, ‘Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium’, Health:, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 335–354, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1177/136345930100500304.
[160]
S. Franklin and C. Roberts, Born and made: an ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis, vol. In-formation series. Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2006.
[161]
F. Fukuyama, Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2002.
[162]
R. G. Gosden, Designer babies: the brave new world of reproductive technology. London: Phoenix, 1999.
[163]
L. Handwerker, ‘New genetic technologies and their impact on women: a feminist perspective’, Gender & Development, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 114–124, May 2003, doi: 10.1080/741954261.
[164]
Kerr, Anne., Genetic politics : from eugenics to genome / Anne Kerr and Tom Shakespeare ; with cartoon by Suzy Varty. [Online]. Available: http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search/Y?searchtype=t&SORT=D&searcharg=Genetic+Politics%3A+from+Eugenics+to+Genome&searchscope=1
[165]
H. Kuhse and P. Singer, A companion to bioethics, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[166]
E. Lee and Institute of Ideas, Designer babies: where should we draw the line?, vol. Debating matters. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2002.
[167]
T. Marteau and M. Richards, Eds., The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511570049
[168]
B. McKibben, Enough: genetic engineering and the end of human nature. London: Bloomsbury, 2004.
[169]
S. McLean and S. Elliston, Eds., Regulating pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a comparative and theoretical analysis, vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2014.
[170]
S. McLean and S. Elliston, Regulating pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a comparative and theoretical analysis, vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Abingdon, Oxon [U.K.]: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9780203096376
[171]
J. Overboe, ‘Disability and Genetics: Affirming the Bare Life (the State of Exception)’, Canadian review of sociology and anthropology (Online)
The Canadian review of sociology and anthropology. [electronic resource] : Revue canadienne de sociologie et d’anthropologie.
Canadian review of sociology and anthropology (Online)
Revue canadienne de sociologie et d’anthropologie
CRSA/RCSA, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 219–235, 2007.
[172]
E. Parens and A. Asch, Prenatal testing and disability rights, vol. Hastings Center studies in ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press, 2000.
[173]
S. Parry, ‘The politics of cloning: mapping the rhetorical convergence of embryos and stem cells in parliamentary debates’, New Genetics and Society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 177–200, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1080/1463677032000102594.
[174]
S. Parry, ‘(Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: Exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 62, no. 10, pp. 2349–2359, May 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.024.
[175]
A. Petersen, ‘Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 1255–1268, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00229-X.
[176]
H. Kuhse and P. Singer, Bioethics: an anthology, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub, 2006.
[177]
S. Franklin and S. McKinnon, Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. London: Duke University Press, 2001.
[178]
S. Franklin and M. M. Lock, Remaking life & death: toward an anthropology of the biosciences, 1st ed., vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 2003.
[179]
Dorothy E. Roberts, ‘Race, Gender, and Genetic Technologies: A New Reproductive Dystopia?’, Signs, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 783–804, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/597132?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[180]
P. J. ROCK, ‘Eugenics and Euthanasia: A cause for concern for disabled people, particularly disabled women’, Disability & Society, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 121–127, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1080/09687599650023399.
[181]
M. A. Rothblatt, Unzipped genes: taking charge of baby-making in the new millennium, vol. America in transition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1997.
[182]
T. Shakespeare, ‘“Losing the plot”? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability’, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 669–688, Sep. 1999, doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.00178.
[183]
LEE M. SILVER, REMAKING EDEN. PHOENIX, 1999.
[184]
M. K. Smith, ‘The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings” and the relevance of the harm principle’, New Genetics and Society, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 154–170, Jun. 2013, doi: 10.1080/14636778.2013.788358.
[185]
D. L. Steinberg, ‘A most selective practice’, Women’s Studies International Forum, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 33–48, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00067-2.
[186]
K. Strong, I. Kerridge, and M. Little, ‘Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children’, Bioethics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 187–193, May 2014, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02001.x.
[187]
Mette N. Svendsen and Lene Koch, ‘Unpacking the “Spare Embryo”: Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape’, Social Studies of Science, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 93–110, 2008 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25474566?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[188]
M. Taylor-Sands, Saviour siblings: a relational approach to the welfare of the child in selective reproduction, vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, England: Routledge, 2013.
[189]
M. Taylor-Sands, Saviour siblings: a relational approach to the welfare of the child in selective reproduction, vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, England: Routledge, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=542441&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[190]
R. Tutton, ‘Gift Relationships in Genetics Research’, Science as Culture, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 523–542, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.1080/0950543022000028965.
[191]
J. Turney, Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
[192]
C. Waldby, ‘Oocyte markets: women’s reproductive work in embryonic stem cell research’, New Genetics and Society, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 19–31, Mar. 2008, doi: 10.1080/14636770701843576.
[193]
C. Waldby and M. Cooper, ‘From Reproductive Work to Regenerative Labour: The Female Body and the Stem Cell Industries’’, Feminist Theory, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–22.
[194]
H. Kuhse and P. Singer, A companion to bioethics, 2nd ed., vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012.
[195]
Heather Widdows, ‘Border Disputes across Bodies: Exploitation in Trafficking for Prostitution and Egg Sale for Stem Cell Research’, International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 5–24, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40339192?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[196]
C. Williams, J. Kitzinger, and L. Henderson, ‘Envisaging the embryo in stem cell research: rhetorical strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates’, Sociology of Health and Illness, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 793–814, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00370.x.
[197]
W. D. Winkelman, S. A. Missmer, D. Myers, and E. S. Ginsburg, ‘Public perspectives on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis’, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 665–675, May 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0456-8.
[198]
‘Campaign To End Sex Selection’. [Online]. Available: http://www.cwpe.org/initiatives/sexselection
[199]
‘Council for Responsible Genetics’. [Online]. Available: http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/Help/About.aspx
[200]
‘FINRRAGE’. [Online]. Available: http://www.finrrage.org/
[201]
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team, ‘Embryo research in the UK - HFEA’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/158.html
[202]
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team, ‘Genetic testing - HFEA’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/172.html
[203]
‘Human Genetics Alert’. [Online]. Available: http://www.hgalert.org/
[204]
‘The ethics of stem cells | Wellcome Trust’. [Online]. Available: http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Human-Fertilisation-and-Embryology-Act/Stem-cell-basics/WTD040077.htm
[205]
J. Bhabha, ‘Moving Babies: Globaliziation, Markets and Transational Adoption’, Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 181–198, 2004 [Online]. Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/forwa28&id=419&collection=journals&index=journals/forwa
[206]
S. Hicks, Lesbian, gay, and queer parenting: families, intimacies, genealogies, vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2587338
[207]
S. Hicks, Lesbian, gay and queer parenting: families, intimacies, genealogies, vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230348592
[208]
A. R. Wilson, Situating intersectionality: Politics, policy, and power, vol. The politics of intersectionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137025135
[209]
D. W. Riggs, ‘"Let’s Go to the Movies”: Filmic Representations of Gay Foster and Adoptive Parents’, Journal of GLBT Family Studies, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 297–312, May 2011, doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2011.564948. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/1550428X.2011.564948
[210]
S. Sales, ‘Contested attachments: rethinking adoptive kinship in the era of open adoption’, Child & Family Social Work, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 149–158, May 2015, doi: 10.1111/cfs.12062. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/cfs.12062/abstract
[211]
A. Bharadwaj, ‘Why adoption is not an option in India: the visibility of infertility, the secrecy of donor insemination, and other cultural complexities’, Social Science & Medicine, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1867–1880, May 2003, doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00210-1. [Online]. Available: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953602002101?via%3Dihub
[212]
L. Briggs, ‘Mother, Child, Race, Nation: The Visual Iconography of Rescue and the Politics of Transnational and Transracial Adoption’, Gender History, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 179–200, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1111/1468-0424.00298. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1468-0424.00298/abstract
[213]
M. J. Campion, Who’s fit to be a parent? London: Routledge, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2687598
[214]
M. J. Campion, Who’s fit to be a parent? London: Routledge, 1995 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=134658
[215]
P. Dunk-West and T. Hafford-Letchfield, Sexual identities and sexuality in social work: research and reflections from women in the field, vol. Contemporary social work studies. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2586208
[216]
P. Dunk-West and T. Hafford-Letchfield, Sexual identities and sexuality in social work: research and reflections from women in the field, vol. Contemporary social work studies. Farnham: Ashgate, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=304747&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[217]
P. J. Conn, Adoption: a brief social and cultural history, First edition., vol. Palgrave Pivot. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137333919
[218]
P. Conn, Adoption: A brief social and cultural history. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137333919
[219]
S. K. Dorow, Transnational adoption: a cultural economy of race, gender, and kinship, vol. Nation of newcomers. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
[220]
H. G. Fogg-Davis, The ethics of transracial adoption. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 2002.
[221]
I. Gaber and J. Aldridge, In the best interests of the child: culture, identity and transracial adoption. London: Free Association Books, 1994.
[222]
D. E. Godon, W. F. Green, and P. G. Ramsey, ‘Transracial Adoptees: The Search for Birth Family and the Search for Self’, Adoption Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–27, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10926755.2014.875087. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/pdf/10.1080/10926755.2014.875087
[223]
S. M. Cretney, R. Probert, and C. Barton, Fifty years in family law: essays for Stephen Cretney. Cambridge: Intersentia, 2012.
[224]
M. Fineman and K. Worthington, What is right for children?: the competing paradigms of religion and human rights. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate, 2009.
[225]
S. Hicks and J. McDermott, Lesbian and gay fostering and adoption: extraordinary yet ordinary. London: Jessica Kingsley, 1999.
[226]
S. Hicks, ‘Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption: A brief UK history’, Adoption and Fostering, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 42–56, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/030857590502900306
[227]
S. Howell, The kinning of foreigners: transnational adoption in a global perspective. New York: Berghahn, 2006.
[228]
P. Wade, Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics, vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books, 2007.
[229]
M. Humphrey and H. Humphrey, Inter-country adoption: practical experiences. London: Tavistock/Routledge, 1993.
[230]
J. Masson, ‘Intercountry Adoption: A Global Problem or a Global Solution.’, Journal of International Affairs, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 141–166, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5355583&site=bsi-live
[231]
J. Kay, The adoption papers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Bloodaxe, 1991.
[232]
D. Kirton, Race, ethnicity and adoption, vol. Race, health, and social care. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000.
[233]
J. B. Leinaweaver, ‘The Quiet Migration Redux: International Adoption, Race, and Difference’, Human Organization, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 62–71 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1513353120?accountid=14888
[234]
B. R. Mandell, Where are the children?: a class analysis of foster care and adoption, vol. Lexington books. Lexington (Mass.): D.C. Heath, 1973.
[235]
P. Wade, Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics, vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books, 2007.
[236]
M. Maxwell and L. Cook, ‘The portrayal of the adopted child in British newspapers and magazines’, Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 318–322, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.1080/17450128.2014.947350. [Online]. Available: https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=The+portrayal+of+the+adopted+child+in+British+newspapers+and+magazines&title=Vulnerable+Children+and+Youth+Studies&aufirst=Maureen&auinit=&aulast=Maxwell&issn=17450128&eissn=17450136&coden=&volume=9&issue=4&spage=318&epage=322&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3
[237]
I. M. Millar, C. Paulson-Ellis, and British Association for Adoption & Fostering, Exploring infertility issues in adoption, vol. Good practice guide. London: British Association for Adoption & Fostering, 2009.
[238]
P. M. Morgan and Institute of Economic Affairs (Great Britain). Health and Welfare Unit, Adoption: the continuing debate, vol. no. 53. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit, 1999.
[239]
C. Mortimore, Immigration and adoption, vol. GEMS. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books and School of Oriental & African Studies, 1994.
[240]
O. Gill and B. Jackson, Adoption and race: black, Asian and mixed race children in white families, vol. Child care policy and practice. London: Batsford Academic and Educational in association with British Agencies for Adoption & Fostering, 1983.
[241]
S. M. Park, ‘Adoptive Maternal Bodies: A Queer Paradigm for Rethinking Mothering?’, Hypatia, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 201–226, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3811085?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[242]
D. E. Roberts, Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty, 1st Vintage ed. New York: Vintage, 1999.
[243]
S. Sales, Adoption, family and the paradox of origins: a Foucauldian history, vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230363281
[244]
S. Sales, Adoption, family and the paradox of origins: A Foucauldian history, vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230363281
[245]
P. Selman and British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering, Intercountry adoption: developments, trends and perspectives. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering, 2000.
[246]
N. Seymour, In black and white. London: BAAF, 2007.
[247]
R. J. Simon, H. Altstein, and M. S. Melli, The case for transracial adoption. Washington, D.C.: American University Press, 1994.
[248]
R. J. Simon and H. Altstein, Adoption, race, & identity: from infancy to young adulthood, 2nd ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers, 2002.
[249]
D. M. Smolin, ‘Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnaping, and Stealing Children’, Wayne Law Review, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 113–200, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/waynlr52&id=123&collection=journals
[250]
J. Leinaweaver and S. van Wichelen, ‘The geography of transnational adoption: kin and place in globalization’, Social & Cultural Geography, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 499–507, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1080/14649365.2015.1033449. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/14649365.2015.1033449
[251]
J. Weise, Transracial adoption: a black perspective, vol. Social work monograph. Norwich: Social Work Monographs, 1988.
[252]
M. N. Younes and S. A. Klein, ‘The International Adoption Experience: Do They Live Happily Ever After?’, Adoption Quarterly, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 65–83, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1080/10926755.2014.875090. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/10926755.2014.875090
[253]
B. Yngvesson, Belonging in an adopted world: race, identity, and transnational adoption, vol. The Chicago series in law and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3099465
[254]
‘Black families and adoption - the debate.’ BBC - London [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2007/09/14/blacklondon_feature.shtml
[255]
L. Conaway, ‘White Kid, Black Family: Transracial Adoption’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://www.npr.org/sections/bryantpark/2007/11/white_kid_black_family_transra.html
[256]
‘Adoption UK’. [Online]. Available: http://www.adoptionuk.org/
[257]
‘Coram’. [Online]. Available: http://www.coram.org.uk/
[258]
‘Childrens Hope International Chinese Adoption Agency’. [Online]. Available: http://www.chinaadoptionagency.com/
[259]
‘International Adoption’. [Online]. Available: http://www.internationaladoptionnet.org/
[260]
‘LGBT Adoption and Fostering Week (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender)’. [Online]. Available: http://www.lgbtadoptfosterweek.org.uk/
[261]
‘Stonewall: Adoption and Fostering’. [Online]. Available: https://www.stonewall.org.uk/help-advice/parenting-rights/adoption-and-fostering
[262]
‘People’s Health Movement’. [Online]. Available: http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7146
[263]
T. Harford, ‘More or Less, How long can you wait to have a baby?’ BBC Radio 4 [Online]. Available: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b039rwd0
[264]
M. Kirkman, L. Harrison, L. Hillier, and P. Pyett, ‘“I know I’m doing a good job”: Canonical and autobiographical narratives of teenage mothers’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 279–294, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1080/13691050010026097. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/13691050010026097
[265]
N. Shelton and S. Johnson, ‘“I think motherhood for me was a bit like a double-edged sword”: the narratives of older mothers’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 316–330, Jul. 2006, doi: 10.1002/casp.867. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1002/casp.867
[266]
M. Nash, Ed., Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[267]
M. Nash, Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences, vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
[268]
J. Aarvold and C. Buswell, ‘Very Young Motherhood: Whose Problem’, Youth and Policy, vol. 64, pp. 1–14, 1999.
[269]
I. Allen, S. B. Dowling, H. Rolfe, and Policy Studies Institute, Teenage mothers: decisions and outcomes, vol. Report. London: Policy Studies Institute, 1998.
[270]
E. Lloyd, A. Phoenix, and A. Woollett, Motherhood: meanings, practices and ideologies, vol. Gender and psychology. London: Sage Publications, 1991.
[271]
E. Bullen, J. Kenway, and V. Hay, ‘New Labour, Social Exclusion and Educational Risk Management: The Case of “Gymslip Mums”’, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 441–456, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1501386?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[272]
M. Breheny and C. Stephens, ‘Individual Responsibility and Social Constraint: The Construction of Adolescent Motherhood in Social Scientific Research’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 333–346, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20460936?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[273]
B. Byrne, ‘In Search of a “Good Mix”: “Race”, Class, Gender and Practices of Mothering’, Sociology, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 1001–1017, Dec. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0038038506069841. [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/0038038506069841
[274]
M. Carolan, ‘"Doing It Properly”: The Experience of First Mothering Over 35 Years’, Health Care for Women International, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 764–787, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1080/07399330500230987. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/07399330500230987
[275]
D. CUTAS, ‘POSTMENOPAUSAL MOTHERHOOD: IMMORAL, ILLEGAL? A CASE STUDY’, Bioethics, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 458–463, Oct. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00583.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00583.x/abstract
[276]
J. E. C. de Carvalho, ‘How can a child be a mother? Discourse on teenage pregnancy in a Brazilian’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 109–120, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/13691050600994448. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/4005513?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[277]
S. Duncan, ‘Mothering, class and rationality’, The Sociological Review, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 50–76, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00503.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00503.x
[278]
S. Duncan, R. Edwards, and C. E. Alexander, Teenage parenthood: what’s the problem? London: Tufnell Press, 2010.
[279]
S. Earle and G. Letherby, ‘Conceiving Time? Women who do or do not conceive’, Sociology of Health & Illness, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 233–250, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00546.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00546.x/abstract
[280]
M. E. Edwards, ‘Education and Occupations: Reexamining the Conventional Wisdom about Later First Births among American Mothers’, Sociological Forum, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 423–443, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3070349?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[281]
V. James and J. Gabe, Health and the sociology of emotions, vol. Sociology of health and illness monograph series. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
[282]
M. L. Heilborn, E. R. Brandão, and C. D. S. Cabral, ‘Teenage pregnancy and moral panic in Brazil’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 403–414, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1080/13691050701369441. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/13691050701369441
[283]
S. Fuller, P. Kershaw, and J. Pulkingham, ‘Constructing “active citizenship”: single mothers, welfare, and the logics of voluntarism’, Citizenship Studies, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 157–176, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1080/13621020801900119. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/13621020801900119
[284]
L. Hadfield, N. Rudoe, and J. Sanderson‐Mann, ‘Motherhood, choice and the British media: a time to reflect’, Gender and Education, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 255–263, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09540250601166100. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/09540250601166100
[285]
G. Hawkes, ‘Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Young Women and Family Planning’, Sociology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 257–273, May 1995, doi: 10.1177/0038038595029002005. [Online]. Available: http://0-soc.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/29/2/257
[286]
M. L. Heilborn, E. R. Brandão, and C. Da Silva Cabral, ‘Teenage Pregnancy and Moral Panic in Brazil’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 403–414, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20460941?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[287]
J. Gregson Higginson, ‘Competitive Parenting: The Culture of Teen Mothers’, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 135–149, 1998 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/353447?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[288]
R. Evans, H. S. Holgate, and F. K. O. Yuen, Teenage pregnancy and parenthood: global perspectives, issues and interventions. London: Routledge, 2006.
[289]
F. Hudson and B. Ineichen, Taking it lying down: sexuality and teenage motherhood. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education, 1991.
[290]
H. Inanc, ‘Unemployment and the timing of parenthood: Implications of partnership status and partner’s employment’, Demographic Research, vol. 32, pp. 219–250 [Online]. Available: http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol32/7/
[291]
J. Kidger, ‘Stories of Redemption? Teenage Mothers as the New Sex Educators’, Sexualities, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 481–496, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1177/1363460705056622. [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1177/1363460705056622
[292]
K. E. Kiernan, ‘Becoming a Young Parent: A Longitudinal Study of Associated Factors’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 406–428, 1997 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/591138?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[293]
J. Kluger, L. Birmingham, R. D. Konigsberg, T. Thean, F. Cabrera, and K. Mahr, ‘Too Old To Be A Dad?’, Time, vol. 181, no. 15, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=87000724&site=bsi-live
[294]
M. Leese, ‘The bumpy road to “becoming”: capturing the stories that teenage mothers told about their journey into motherhood’, Child & Family Social Work, p. n/a-n/a, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1111/cfs.12169. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/cfs.12169/abstract
[295]
K. Luker, Dubious conceptions: the politics of teenage pregnancy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1996.
[296]
A. Lawson and D. L. Rhode, The Politics of pregnancy: adolescent sexuality and public policy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993.
[297]
E. McDermott and H. Graham, ‘Resilient Young Mothering: Social Inequalities, Late Modernity and the “Problem” of “Teenage” Motherhood’, Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 59–79, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/13676260500063702. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/13676260500063702
[298]
M. Mills, R. R. Rindfuss, P. McDonald, and E. te Velde, ‘Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives’, Human Reproduction Update, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 848–860, Nov. 2011, doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmr026. [Online]. Available: https://0-academic-oup-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/humupd/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/humupd/dmr026
[299]
S. Mollborn, ‘Making the Best of a Bad Situation: Material Resources and Teenage Parenthood’, Journal of Marriage and Family, vol. 69, no. 1, pp. 92–104, 2007.
[300]
S. Mollborn and J. Jacobs, ‘"We’ll Figure a Way”: Teenage Mothers’ Experiences in Shifting Social and Economic Contexts’, Qualitative Sociology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 23–46, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s11133-011-9213-1. [Online]. Available: https://0-link-springer-com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/article/10.1007%2Fs11133-011-9213-1
[301]
M. Perrier, ‘No right time: the significance of reproductive timing for younger and older mothers’ moralities’, The Sociological Review, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 69–87, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1111/1467-954X.12005. [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/1467-954X.12005
[302]
A. Phoenix, Young mothers?, vol. Family life series. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991.
[303]
A. Rolfe, ‘“You’ve got to grow up when you’ve got a kid”: Marginalized young women’s accounts of motherhood’, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 299–314, Jul. 2008, doi: 10.1002/casp.925. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1002/casp.925/abstract
[304]
J. L. Rosenthal, R. C. Zimmermann, and M. V. Sauer, ‘P-180 The desire for childbearing in women of advanced reproductive age: Findings in a donor oocyte program’, Fertility and Sterility, vol. 68, pp. S179–S180, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(97)90995-X. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.sciencedirect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S001502829790995X?via%3Dihub
[305]
‘RCOG statement on later maternal age’. 9AD [Online]. Available: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-statement-on-later-maternal-age/
[306]
G. Schofield, The youngest mothers: the experience of pregnancy and motherhood among young women of school age. Aldershot: Avebury, 1994.
[307]
P. Selman and C. Glendinning, ‘Teenage Pregnancy and Social Policy’, Youth and Policy, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 39–58, 1994.
[308]
E. Sevon, ‘Timing Motherhood: Experiencing and Narrating the Choice to Become a Mother’, Feminism & psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 461–482, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/0959-353505057619
[309]
R. L. Shaw and D. C. Giles, ‘Motherhood on ice? A media framing analysis of older mothers in the UK news’, Psychology & Health, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 221–236, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1080/08870440701601625.
[310]
S. Tabberer and Joseph Rowntree Foundation, Teenage pregnancy and choice: abortion or motherhood : influences on the decision. York: York Publishing Services for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2000.
[311]
S. L. Tornello and C. J. Patterson, ‘Timing of Parenthood and Experiences of Gay Fathers: A Life Course Perspective’, Journal of GLBT Family Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 35–56, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1080/1550428X.2013.878681. [Online]. Available: http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/0959-353505057619
[312]
K. Weed, J. S. Nicholson, and J. R. Farris, Teen pregnancy and parenting: rethinking the myths and misperceptions, vol. Routledge advances in health and social policy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9780203079607
[313]
S. L. Ramey, Interwoven lives: adolescent mothers and their children, vol. Research monographs in adolescence. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001.
[314]
H. WILSON and A. HUNTINGTON, ‘Deviant (M)others: The Construction of Teenage Motherhood in Contemporary Discourse’, Journal of Social Policy, vol. 35, no. 01, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1017/S0047279405009335. [Online]. Available: http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/222056835?accountid=14888
[315]
‘Bubbalicious: The Place for Young Parents’. [Online]. Available: http://www.bubbalicious.co.uk/?gclid=CLLKqtOH5LkCFcbLtAod1SkAcw
[316]
‘Following Young Fathers’. [Online]. Available: http://followingfathers.leeds.ac.uk/
[317]
‘Mothers Over 40’. [Online]. Available: http://www.mothersover40.com/home.html
[318]
‘Nurture: Stories of New Midlife Mothers’. [Online]. Available: http://www.midlifemothers.org/
[319]
‘The Tindall Foundation Thrive Teen Parenting Centre’. [Online]. Available: http://tindall.org.nz/thrive-teen-parenting-centre-empowering-young-parents-to-build-thriving-families/
[320]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2647316
[321]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
[322]
B. K. Jaworski, ‘Reproductive justice and media framing: a case‐study analysis of problematic frames in the popular media’, Sex Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 105–121, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1080/14681810802639830. [Online]. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1080/14681810802639830
[323]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
[324]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
[325]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[326]
C. E. Joffe and J. A. Reich, Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings, vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, 2015 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
[327]
I. Aboderin, ‘Sexual and reproductive health and rights of older men and women: addressing a policy blind spot’, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 22, no. 44, pp. 185–190, Nov. 2014, doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44814-6. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1016/S0968-8080%2814%2944814-6
[328]
A. BAILEY, ‘Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy’, Hypatia, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 715–741, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41328877
[329]
‘Roundtable: Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Justice’, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 102–125 [Online]. Available: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/frontiers/v034/34.3.briggs.html
[330]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=871430
[331]
J. C. Chrisler, Reproductive justice: a global concern, vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger, 2012 [Online]. Available: http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
[332]
J. C. Chrisler, ‘A Reproductive Justice Approach to Women’s Health’, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 205–209, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1111/asap.12056. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/asap.12056/abstract
[333]
A. Germain, G. Sen, C. Garcia-Moreno, and M. Shankar, ‘Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in low- and middle-income countries: Implications for the post-2015 global development agenda’, Global Public Health, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 137–148, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1080/17441692.2014.986177. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/17441692.2014.986177
[334]
C. Grown, E. Braunstein, and A. Malhotra, Trading women’s health and rights?: trade liberalization and reproductive health in developing economies. London: Zed Books, 2006.
[335]
M. Jarman, ‘Relations of Abortion: Crip Approaches to Reproductive Justice’, Feminist Formations, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 46–66, 2015, doi: 10.1353/ff.2015.0008. [Online]. Available: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/article/582251
[336]
‘Decentering the Individual and Centering Community: Using a Reproductive Justice Methodology to Examine the Uses of Reprogenetics’, Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 213–225 [Online]. Available: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/frontiers/v034/34.3.jesudason.html
[337]
L. Knudsen, ‘Introduction’, in Reproductive rights in a global context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan, Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press, 2006, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=89c7edce-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[338]
L. Knudsen, ‘Introduction’, in Reproductive rights in a global context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan, Nashville [Tenn.]: Vanderbilt University Press, 2006, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=89c7edce-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[339]
A. Kulczycki, Ed., Critical Issues in Reproductive Health, vol. Springer series on demographic methods and population analysis. Dordrecht: Springer, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://0-link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-94-007-6722-5
[340]
I. Lichtenberg and J. LeClair, ‘Advocating Equal Protection for Men in Reproductive Rights and Responsibilities’, Southern University Law Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 53–78, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/soulr38&id=57&collection=journals
[341]
S. Madhok, M. Unnithan, and C. Heitmeyer, ‘On reproductive justice: “domestic violence”, rights and the law in India’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1231–1244, Nov. 2014 [Online]. Available: https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=On+reproductive+justice:+’domestic+violence’,+rights+and+the+law+in+India.&title=Culture,+Health+&+Sexuality&aufirst=&auinit=&aulast=Madhok&issn=13691058&eissn=&coden=&volume=16&issue=10&spage=1231&epage=&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3
[342]
A. Piepmeier, ‘The Inadequacy of “Choice”: Disability and What’s Wrong with Feminist Framings of Reproduction’, Feminist Studies, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 159–186, 2013 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/23719307?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
[343]
J. M. Silliman, M. G. Fried, L. Ross, and E. R. Gutiérrez, Undivided rights: women of color organize for reproductive justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press, 2004.
[344]
C. Sufrin, A. Kolbi-Molinas, and R. Roth, ‘Reproductive Justice, Health Disparities And Incarcerated Women in the United States’, Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 213–219, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1363/47e3115. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1363/47e3115/abstract
[345]
E. Tomasovic, ‘Robbed of Reproductive Justice: The Necessity of a Global Initiative to Provide Redress to Roma Women Coercively Sterilized in Eastern Europe’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 765–824, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/colhr41&id=771&collection=journals
[346]
M. Unnithan and S. L. Pigg, ‘Sexual and reproductive health rights and justice – tracking the relationship’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 1181–1187, Nov. 2014 [Online]. Available: https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=Sexual+and+reproductive+health+rights+and+justice--tracking+the+relationship.&title=Culture,+Health+&+Sexuality&aufirst=&auinit=&aulast=M&issn=14645351&eissn=&coden=&volume=16&issue=10&spage=1181&epage=&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3
[347]
A. E. Yamin and V. M. Boulanger, ‘Embedding sexual and reproductive health and rights in a transformational development framework: lessons learned from the MDG targets and indicators’, Reproductive Health Matters, vol. 21, no. 42, pp. 74–85, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(13)42727-1. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1016/S0968-8080%2813%2942727-1
[348]
A. E. Yamin and V. M. Boulanger, ‘Why Global Goals and Indicators Matter: The Experience of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the Millennium Development Goals’, Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, vol. 15, no. 2–3, pp. 218–231, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1080/19452829.2014.896322. [Online]. Available: http://0-www.tandfonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1080/19452829.2014.896322
[349]
A. N. Zucker, ‘Reproductive Justice: More Than Choice’, Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 210–213, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1111/asap.12059. [Online]. Available: http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/10.1111/asap.12059/abstract
[350]
‘Alliance for Justice’. [Online]. Available: http://www.afj.org/campaigns/reproductive-justice-roe-at-risk
[351]
‘Bad Reputation’. [Online]. Available: https://badreputation.org.uk/2011/03/02/reproductive-justice-in-the-uk-part-1/
[352]
‘Global Thematic Campaign on Gender and Reproductive Justice | People’s Health Movement’. [Online]. Available: http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7146
[353]
‘SisterSong | Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective’. [Online]. Available: http://sistersong.net/
[354]
‘The Pro-Choice Public Education Project’. [Online]. Available: http://www.protectchoice.org/index.php
[355]
S. Dowrick and S. Grundberg, Why Children? London: The Women’s Press, 1980.
