Aarvold, J., & Buswell, C. (1999). Very Young Motherhood: Whose Problem. Youth and Policy, 64, 1–14.
Aboderin, I. (2014). Sexual and reproductive health and rights of older men and women: addressing a policy blind spot. Reproductive Health Matters, 22(44), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44814-6
Adoption UK. (n.d.). http://www.adoptionuk.org/
Allen, I., Dowling, S. B., Rolfe, H., & Policy Studies Institute. (1998). Teenage mothers: decisions and outcomes: Vol. Report. Policy Studies Institute.
Alliance for Justice. (n.d.). http://www.afj.org/campaigns/reproductive-justice-roe-at-risk
Almeling, R. (2006). ‘Why do you want to be a donor?’: gender and the production of altruism in egg and sperm donation. New Genetics and Society, 25(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770600855184
Almeling, R. (2011). Sex cells: the medical market for eggs and sperm. University of California Press.
Almeling, Rene. (n.d.). Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material. American Sociological Review, 72(3), 319–340. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/218831869?accountid=14888
Andrews, L. B. (2000). The clone age: adventures in the new world of reproductive technology (FirstOwl Books edition). Henry Holt.
Anne Phillips. (2011). It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It: Bodies as Objects and Property. Political Theory, 39(6), 724–748. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41502590?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Arditti, R., Klein, R. D., & Minden, S. (1989). Test-tube women: what future for motherhood? Pandora.
ATKIN, K. (2003). Ethnicity and the Politics of the New Genetics: Principles and Engagement. Ethnicity & Health, 8(2), 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850303561
Atwood, M. (1996). The handmaid’s tale. Vintage.
Bad Reputation. (n.d.). https://badreputation.org.uk/2011/03/02/reproductive-justice-in-the-uk-part-1/
BAILEY, A. (2011a). Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy. Hypatia, 26(4), 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x
BAILEY, A. (2011b). Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy. Hypatia, 26(4), 715–741. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x
Baslington, H. (1996). Anxiety overflow. Women’s Studies International Forum, 19(6), 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00088-X
Bergman, K., Rubio, R. J., Green, R.-J., & Padrón, E. (2010). Gay Men Who Become Fathers via Surrogacy: The Transition to Parenthood. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 6(2), 111–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504281003704942
Bhabha, J. (2004). Moving Babies: Globaliziation, Markets and Transational Adoption. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs, 28(2), 181–198. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/forwa28&id=419&collection=journals&index=journals/forwa
Bharadwaj, A. (2003). Why adoption is not an option in India: the visibility of infertility, the secrecy of donor insemination, and other cultural complexities. Social Science & Medicine, 56(9), 1867–1880. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00210-1
Birke, L. I. A., Vines, G., & Himmelweit, S. (1990). Tomorrow’s child: reproductive technologies in the 90s. Virago.
Black families and adoption - the debate. (n.d.). BBC - London. http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2007/09/14/blacklondon_feature.shtml
Breheny, M., & Stephens, C. (2007). Individual Responsibility and Social Constraint: The Construction of Adolescent Motherhood in Social Scientific Research. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9(4), 333–346. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20460936?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Briggs, L. (2003). Mother, Child, Race, Nation: The Visual Iconography of Rescue and the Politics of Transnational and Transracial Adoption. Gender History, 15(2), 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.00298
Bubbalicious: The Place for Young Parents. (n.d.). http://www.bubbalicious.co.uk/?gclid=CLLKqtOH5LkCFcbLtAod1SkAcw
Bullen, E., Kenway, J., & Hay, V. (2000). New Labour, Social Exclusion and Educational Risk Management: The Case of ‘Gymslip Mums’. British Educational Research Journal, 26(4), 441–456. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1501386?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Burfoot, A. (1995). In-appropriation — a critique of Proceed With Care. Women’s Studies International Forum, 18(4), 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(95)80039-R
Byrne, B. (2006). In Search of a ‘Good Mix’: ‘Race’, Class, Gender and Practices of Mothering. Sociology, 40(6), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506069841
Cahn, N. R. (2013). The new kinship: constructing donor-conceived families: Vol. Families, law, and society series. New York University Press.
Campaign To End Sex Selection. (n.d.). http://www.cwpe.org/initiatives/sexselection
Campion, M. J. (1995a). Who’s fit to be a parent? Routledge. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2687598
Campion, M. J. (1995b). Who’s fit to be a parent? [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=134658
Carolan, M. (2005). "Doing It Properly”: The Experience of First Mothering Over 35 Years. Health Care for Women International, 26(9), 764–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330500230987
Childrens Hope International Chinese Adoption Agency. (n.d.). http://www.chinaadoptionagency.com/
Chrisler, J. C. (2012a). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology. Praeger.
Chrisler, J. C. (2012b). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology [Electronic resource]. Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
Chrisler, J. C. (2012c). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology. Praeger. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2647316
Chrisler, J. C. (2012d). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology [Electronic resource]. Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
Chrisler, J. C. (2012e). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology. Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
Chrisler, J. C. (2012f). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology [Electronic resource]. Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
Chrisler, J. C. (2012g). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology. Praeger. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=871430
Chrisler, J. C. (2012h). Reproductive justice: a global concern: Vol. Women’s psychology [Electronic resource]. Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430
Chrisler, J. C. (2014). A Reproductive Justice Approach to Women’s Health. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 205–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12056
Conaway, L. (2007). White Kid, Black Family: Transracial Adoption. http://www.npr.org/sections/bryantpark/2007/11/white_kid_black_family_transra.html
Conn, P. (2013). Adoption: A brief social and cultural history [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137333919
Conn, P. J. (2013). Adoption: a brief social and cultural history: Vol. Palgrave Pivot (First edition). Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137333919
Cook, R., Sclater, S. D., & Kaganas, F. (2003a). Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Hart.
Cook, R., Sclater, S. D., & Kaganas, F. (2003b). Surrogate motherhood: international perspectives. Hart.
Coram. (n.d.). http://www.coram.org.uk/
Corea, G. (1988a). The mother machine: reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. Women’s Press.
Corea, G. (1988b). The mother machine: reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. Women’s Press.
Corea, G. & International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women. (1987). Man-made women: how new reproductive technologies affect women (1st Midland book ed). Indiana University Press.
cots. (n.d.). http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/
COTS UK (surrogacy support group). (n.d.). http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/
Council for Responsible Genetics. (n.d.). http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/Help/About.aspx
Cretney, S. M., Probert, R., & Barton, C. (2012). Fifty years in family law: essays for Stephen Cretney. Intersentia.
Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Van Rooij, F. (2009). Marginalized reproduction: ethnicity, infertility and reproductive technologies: Vol. Science in society series [Electronic resource]. Earthscan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=217074&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Van Rooij, F. (Eds.). (2013). Marginalized reproduction: ethnicity, infertility and reproductive technologies: Vol. Earthscan science in society series. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=217074&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
CUTAS, D. (2007). POSTMENOPAUSAL MOTHERHOOD: IMMORAL, ILLEGAL? A CASE STUDY. Bioethics, 21(8), 458–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00583.x
Daniels, K. R., Lewis, G. M., & Gillett, W. (1995). Telling donor insemination offspring about their conception: The nature of couples’ decision-making. Social Science & Medicine, 40(9), 1213–1220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00251-N
DasGupta, S., & Dasgupta, S. D. (Eds.). (2014). Globalization and transnational surrogacy in India: outsourcing life. Lexington Books.
de Carvalho, J. E. C. (2007). How can a child be a mother? Discourse on teenage pregnancy in a Brazilian. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050600994448
Decentering the Individual and Centering Community: Using a Reproductive Justice Methodology to Examine the Uses of Reprogenetics. (n.d.). Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 213–225. http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/frontiers/v034/34.3.jesudason.html
Deech, R., & Smajdor, A. (2007a). From IVF to immortality: controversy in the era of reproductive technology. Oxford University Press.
Deech, R., & Smajdor, A. (2007b). From IVF to immortality: controversy in the era of reproductive technology [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219780.001.0001
DeGrazia, D. (2012). Creation ethics: genetics, reproduction, and quality of life [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389630.001.0001
Denny, E. (1994). Liberation or oppression? radical feminism and in vitro fertilisation. Sociology of Health and Illness, 16(1), 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347010
Dorothy E. Roberts. (2009). Race, Gender, and Genetic Technologies: A New Reproductive Dystopia? Signs, 34(4), 783–804. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/597132?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Dorow, S. K. (2006). Transnational adoption: a cultural economy of race, gender, and kinship: Vol. Nation of newcomers. New York University Press.
Dowrick, S., & Grundberg, S. (1980). Why Children? The Women’s Press.
Duncan, S. (2005). Mothering, class and rationality. The Sociological Review, 53(1), 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00503.x
Duncan, S., Edwards, R., & Alexander, C. E. (2010). Teenage parenthood: what’s the problem? Tufnell Press.
Dunk-West, P., & Hafford-Letchfield, T. (2011a). Sexual identities and sexuality in social work: research and reflections from women in the field: Vol. Contemporary social work studies. Ashgate. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2586208
Dunk-West, P., & Hafford-Letchfield, T. (2011b). Sexual identities and sexuality in social work: research and reflections from women in the field: Vol. Contemporary social work studies [Electronic resource]. Ashgate. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=304747&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Earle, S., Komaromy, C., & Layne, L. L. (2012a). Understanding reproductive loss: perspectives on life, death and fertility. Ashgate. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2655848
Earle, S., Komaromy, C., & Layne, L. L. (2012b). Understanding reproductive loss: perspectives on life, death and fertility [Electronic resource]. Ashgate. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781409428114
Earle, S., & Letherby, G. (2007). Conceiving Time? Women who do or do not conceive. Sociology of Health & Illness, 29(2), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00546.x
Edwards, J. (1999). Technologies of procreation: kinship in the age of assisted conception (2nd ed). Routledge.
Edwards, M. E. (2002). Education and Occupations: Reexamining the Conventional Wisdom about Later First Births among American Mothers. Sociological Forum, 17(3), 423–443. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3070349?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ehrich, K., Williams, C., & Farsides, B. (2008). The embryo as moral work object: PGD/IVF staff views and experiences. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30(5), 772–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01083.x
Ettorre, E. (2000). Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body: `Please Doctor, may I have a Normal Baby?’. Sociology, 34(3), 403–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000262
Evans, R., Holgate, H. S., & Yuen, F. K. O. (2006). Teenage pregnancy and parenthood: global perspectives, issues and interventions. Routledge.
Farquhar, D. (1996a). The other machine: discourse and reproductive technologies: Vol. Thinking gender. Routledge.
Farquhar, D. (1996b). The other machine: discourse and reproductive technologies: Vol. Thinking gender. Routledge.
Fertility Fairness. (n.d.). http://www.fertilityfairness.co.uk/
Find Surrogate Mothers. (n.d.). http://www.findsurrogatemother.com/
Fineman, M., & Worthington, K. (2009). What is right for children?: the competing paradigms of religion and human rights. Ashgate.
FINRRAGE. (n.d.-a). http://www.finrrage.org/
FINRRAGE. (n.d.-b). http://www.finrrage.org/
FINRRAGE. (n.d.-c). http://www.finrrage.org/
Fogg-Davis, H. G. (2002). The ethics of transracial adoption. Cornell University Press.
Following Young Fathers. (n.d.). http://followingfathers.leeds.ac.uk/
Franklin, S. (1997a). Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception. Routledge. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=180137
Franklin, S. (1997b). Embodied progress: a cultural account of assisted conception [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=32286&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Franklin, S. (2001). Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium. Health:, 5(3), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/136345930100500304
Franklin, S., & Lock, M. M. (2003). Remaking life & death: toward an anthropology of the biosciences: Vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series (1st ed). School of American Research Press.
Franklin, S., & McKinnon, S. (2001). Relative values: reconfiguring kinship studies. Duke University Press.
Franklin, S., & Roberts, C. (2006). Born and made: an ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis: Vol. In-formation series. Princeton University Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future: consequences of the biotechnology revolution. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Full Service, Worldwide Surrogate-Parenting Agency | Circle Surrogacy. (n.d.). http://www.circlesurrogacy.com/
Fuller, S., Kershaw, P., & Pulkingham, J. (2008). Constructing ‘active citizenship’: single mothers, welfare, and the logics of voluntarism. Citizenship Studies, 12(2), 157–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020801900119
Gaber, I., & Aldridge, J. (1994). In the best interests of the child: culture, identity and transracial adoption. Free Association Books.
Germain, A., Sen, G., Garcia-Moreno, C., & Shankar, M. (2015). Advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in low- and middle-income countries: Implications for the post-2015 global development agenda. Global Public Health, 10(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.986177
Gill, O., & Jackson, B. (1983). Adoption and race: black, Asian and mixed race children in white families: Vol. Child care policy and practice. Batsford Academic and Educational in association with British Agencies for Adoption & Fostering.
Global Thematic Campaign on Gender and Reproductive Justice | People’s Health Movement. (n.d.). http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7146
Godon, D. E., Green, W. F., & Ramsey, P. G. (2014). Transracial Adoptees: The Search for Birth Family and the Search for Self. Adoption Quarterly, 17(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2014.875087
Goldfarb, J. M. (Ed.). (2014). Third-party reproduction: a comprehensive guide. Springer. http://0-link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1
Gosden, R. G. (1999). Designer babies: the brave new world of reproductive technology. Phoenix.
Grace, V. M., Daniels, K. R., & Gillett, W. (2008). The donor, the father, and the imaginary constitution of the family: Parents’ constructions in the case of donor insemination. Social Science & Medicine, 66(2), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029
Greenfield, J., & Jennings, S. (1995). From surrogacy to contested adoption: what went wrong? Adoption and Fostering, 19(4), 34–40. http://0-aaf.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/19/4/34.abstract
Gregson Higginson, J. (1998). Competitive Parenting: The Culture of Teen Mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, 60(1), 135–149. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/353447?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Grown, C., Braunstein, E., & Malhotra, A. (2006). Trading women’s health and rights?: trade liberalization and reproductive health in developing economies. Zed Books.
Hadfield, L., Rudoe, N., & Sanderson‐Mann, J. (2007). Motherhood, choice and the British media: a time to reflect. Gender and Education, 19(2), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250601166100
Hands Off Our Ovaries. (n.d.). http://www.handsoffourovaries.com/
Handwerker, L. (1995). Social and Ethical Implications of In Vitro Fertilization in Contemporary China. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 4(03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100006101
Handwerker, L. (2003). New genetic technologies and their impact on women: a feminist perspective. Gender & Development, 11(1), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/741954261
Hanson, F. A. (2001). Donor Insemination: Eugenic and Feminist Implications. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 15(3), 287–311. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/649581?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Harford, T. (n.d.). More or Less, How long can you wait to have a baby? (R. Alexander, Ed.). BBC Radio 4. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b039rwd0
Hargreaves, K. (2006). Constructing families and kinship through donor insemination. Sociology of Health and Illness, 28(3), 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00492.x
Hartouni, V. (1997a). Cultural conceptions: on reproductive technologies and the remaking of life. University of Minnesota Press.
Hartouni, V. (1997b). Cultural conceptions: on reproductive technologies and the remaking of life. University of Minnesota Press.
Hawkes, G. (1995). Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Young Women and Family Planning. Sociology, 29(2), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029002005
Heather Widdows. (2009). Border Disputes across Bodies: Exploitation in Trafficking for Prostitution and Egg Sale for Stem Cell Research. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 2(1), 5–24. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40339192?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Heilborn, M. L., Brandão, E. R., & Cabral, C. D. S. (2007). Teenage pregnancy and moral panic in Brazil. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050701369441
Heilborn, M. L., Brandão, E. R., & Da Silva Cabral, C. (2007). Teenage Pregnancy and Moral Panic in Brazil. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 9(4), 403–414. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20460941?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Hicks, S. (2005). Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption: A brief UK history. Adoption and Fostering, 29(3), 42–56. http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/030857590502900306
Hicks, S. (2011a). Lesbian, gay, and queer parenting: families, intimacies, genealogies: Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Palgrave Macmillan. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2587338
Hicks, S. (2011b). Lesbian, gay and queer parenting: families, intimacies, genealogies: Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230348592
Hicks, S., & McDermott, J. (1999). Lesbian and gay fostering and adoption: extraordinary yet ordinary. Jessica Kingsley.
Hirsch, M., & Keller, E. F. (1990). Conflicts in feminism. Routledge.
Hochschild, A. (2011). Emotional Life on the Market Frontier. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 21–33. https://0-www-jstor-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41288597?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents
Horsey, K. (Ed.). (2015a). Revisiting the regulation of human fertilisation and embryology: Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315767895
Horsey, K. (2015b). Revisiting the regulation of human fertilisation and embryology: Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315767895
Howell, S. (2006). The kinning of foreigners: transnational adoption in a global perspective. Berghahn.
Hudson, F., & Ineichen, B. (1991). Taking it lying down: sexuality and teenage motherhood. Macmillan Education.
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. (n.d.-a). Donation reviews and consultations - HFEA. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/513.html
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. (n.d.-b). Embryo research in the UK - HFEA. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/158.html
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. (n.d.-c). Genetic testing - HFEA. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/172.html
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. (n.d.-d). HFEA - Fertility, Infertility, IVF, Embryo research -. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. (n.d.-e). HFEA Code of Practice: Guidance Note 12. Egg sharing arrangements (version 2.0). Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/499.html
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. (n.d.-f). National Donation Strategy Group. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.altrui.co.uk/2012/05/03/hfea-national-donation-strategy-group/
Human Genetics Alert. (n.d.). http://www.hgalert.org/
Humphrey, M., & Humphrey, H. (1993). Inter-country adoption: practical experiences. Tavistock/Routledge.
Inanc, H. (n.d.). Unemployment and the timing of parenthood: Implications of partnership status and partner’s employment. Demographic Research, 32, 219–250. http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol32/7/
Inhorn, M. C. (2003). Local babies, global science: gender, religion, and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. Routledge.
Inhorn, M. C. (2007). Masturbation, Semen Collection and Men’s IVF Experiences: Anxieties in the Muslim World. Body & Society, 13(3), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X07082251
Inhorn, M. C. (Ed.). (2009). Reconceiving the second sex: men, masculinity, and reproduction: Vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. Berghahn Books.
Inhorn, M. C., & Balen, F. van. (2002). Infertility around the globe: new thinking on childlessness, gender, and reproductive technologies. University of California Press.
Inhorn, M. C., Mosegaard, M. la C., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, T., & Oppenheimer, H. (2009). Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity, and Reproduction: Vol. Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality. Berghahn Books. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780857455369
Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2012a). Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives: Vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. Berghahn Books.
Inhorn, M. C., & Tremayne, S. (2012b). Islam and assisted reproductive technologies: Sunni and Shia perspectives: Vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. Berghahn Books.
International Adoption. (n.d.). http://www.internationaladoptionnet.org/
Jackson, E. (2001). Regulating reproduction: law, technology, and autonomy [Electronic resource]. Hart Pub. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000222.html
Jackson, E. M. (2001). Regulating reproduction: law, technology and autonomy. Hart. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2558274
James, V., & Gabe, J. (1996). Health and the sociology of emotions: Vol. Sociology of health and illness monograph series. Blackwell Publishers.
Jarman, M. (2015). Relations of Abortion: Crip Approaches to Reproductive Justice. Feminist Formations, 27(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2015.0008
Jaworski, B. K. (2009). Reproductive justice and media framing: a case‐study analysis of problematic frames in the popular media. Sex Education, 9(1), 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810802639830
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015a). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender. Routledge. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2808874
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015b). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015c). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015d). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015e). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015f). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015g). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Joffe, C. E., & Reich, J. A. (2015h). Reproduction and society: interdisciplinary readings: Vol. Perspectives on gender [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222
Kauffman, L. S. (1993a). American feminist thought at century’s end: a reader. Blackwell.
Kauffman, L. S. (1993b). American feminist thought at century’s end: a reader. Blackwell.
Kay, J. (1991). The adoption papers. Bloodaxe.
Kerr, Anne. (n.d.). Genetic politics : from eugenics to genome / Anne Kerr and Tom Shakespeare ; with cartoon by Suzy Varty. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search/Y?searchtype=t&SORT=D&searcharg=Genetic+Politics%3A+from+Eugenics+to+Genome&searchscope=1
Kidger, J. (2005). Stories of Redemption? Teenage Mothers as the New Sex Educators. Sexualities, 8(4), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705056622
Kiernan, K. E. (1997). Becoming a Young Parent: A Longitudinal Study of Associated Factors. The British Journal of Sociology, 48(3), 406–428. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/591138?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Kirkman, M. (2003). Egg and Embryo Donation and the Meaning of Motherhood. Women & Health, 38(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v38n02_01
Kirkman, M., Harrison, L., Hillier, L., & Pyett, P. (2001). ‘I know I’m doing a good job’: Canonical and autobiographical narratives of teenage mothers. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 3(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050010026097
Kirton, D. (2000). Race, ethnicity and adoption: Vol. Race, health, and social care. Open University Press.
Kluger, J., Birmingham, L., Konigsberg, R. D., Thean, T., Cabrera, F., & Mahr, K. (2013). Too Old To Be A Dad? Time, 181(15). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=87000724&site=bsi-live
Knudsen, L. (2006). Introduction. In Reproductive rights in a global context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan. Vanderbilt University Press, 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=89c7edce-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Krahn, T., & Wong, S. (2009). Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and reproductive autonomy. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 19, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60275-1
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2006a). Bioethics: an anthology: Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies (2nd ed). Blackwell Pub.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2006b). Bioethics: an anthology: Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies (2nd ed). Blackwell Pub.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2006c). Bioethics: an anthology: Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies (2nd ed). Blackwell Pub.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2012a). A companion to bioethics: Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy (2nd ed). Wiley-Blackwell.
Kuhse, H., & Singer, P. (2012b). A companion to bioethics: Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy (2nd ed). Wiley-Blackwell.
Kulczycki, A. (Ed.). (2014). Critical Issues in Reproductive Health: Vol. Springer series on demographic methods and population analysis. Springer. http://0-link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-94-007-6722-5
L. Knudsen. (2006). Introduction [Electronic resource]. In Reproductive rights in a global context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan. Vanderbilt University Press, 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=89c7edce-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Lawson, A., & Rhode, D. L. (1993). The Politics of pregnancy: adolescent sexuality and public policy. Yale University Press.
Layne, L. L. (1999). Transformative motherhood: on giving and getting in a consumer culture. New York University Press.
Lee, E. & Institute of Ideas. (2002). Designer babies: where should we draw the line? Vol. Debating matters. Hodder & Stoughton.
LEE M. SILVER. (1999). REMAKING EDEN [Paperback]. PHOENIX.
Lee, R. G., & Morgan, D. (2001a). Human fertilisation and embryology: regulating the reproductive revolution. Blackstone.
Lee, R. G., & Morgan, D. (2001b). Human fertilisation and embryology: regulating the reproductive revolution. Blackstone.
Leese, M. (2014). The bumpy road to ‘becoming’: capturing the stories that teenage mothers told about their journey into motherhood. Child & Family Social Work, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12169
Leinaweaver, J. B. (n.d.). The Quiet Migration Redux: International Adoption, Race, and Difference. Human Organization, 73(1), 62–71. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1513353120?accountid=14888
Leinaweaver, J., & van Wichelen, S. (2015). The geography of transnational adoption: kin and place in globalization. Social & Cultural Geography, 16(5), 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2015.1033449
Lewiecki-Wilson, C., & Cellio, J. (2011a). Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge: Vol. Critical perspectives on disability (1st ed). Syracuse University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166
Lewiecki-Wilson, C., & Cellio, J. (2011b). Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge: Vol. Critical perspectives on disability (1st ed). Syracuse University Press.
Lewiecki-Wilson, C., & Cellio, J. (2014a). Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge: Vol. Critical perspectives on disability (1st ed). Syracuse University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166
Lewiecki-Wilson, C., & Cellio, J. (2014b). Disability and mothering: liminal spaces of embodied knowledge: Vol. Critical perspectives on disability (1st ed). Syracuse University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166
LGBT Adoption and Fostering Week (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender). (n.d.). http://www.lgbtadoptfosterweek.org.uk/
Lichtenberg, I., & LeClair, J. (2011). Advocating Equal Protection for Men in Reproductive Rights and Responsibilities. Southern University Law Review, 38(1), 53–78. https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/soulr38&id=57&collection=journals
Lloyd, E., Phoenix, A., & Woollett, A. (1991). Motherhood: meanings, practices and ideologies: Vol. Gender and psychology. Sage Publications.
Luker, K. (1996). Dubious conceptions: the politics of teenage pregnancy. Harvard University Press.
Madhok, S., Unnithan, M., & Heitmeyer, C. (2014). On reproductive justice: ‘domestic violence’, rights and the law in India. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(10), 1231–1244. https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=On+reproductive+justice:+’domestic+violence’,+rights+and+the+law+in+India.&title=Culture,+Health+&+Sexuality&aufirst=&auinit=&aulast=Madhok&issn=13691058&eissn=&coden=&volume=16&issue=10&spage=1231&epage=&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3
Maher, J. (2014). Something Else Besides a Father. Feminist Media Studies, 14(5), 853–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2013.831369
Mandell, B. R. (1973). Where are the children?: a class analysis of foster care and adoption: Vol. Lexington books. D.C. Heath.
Markens, S. (2007). Surrogate motherhood and the politics of reproduction. University of California Press.
Marteau, T., & Richards, M. (Eds.). (1996). The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511570049
Masson, J. (2001). Intercountry Adoption: A Global Problem or a Global Solution. Journal of International Affairs, 55(1), 141–166. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5355583&site=bsi-live
Maxwell, M., & Cook, L. (2014). The portrayal of the adopted child in British newspapers and magazines. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 9(4), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2014.947350
McDermott, E., & Graham, H. (2005). Resilient Young Mothering: Social Inequalities, Late Modernity and the ‘Problem’ of ‘Teenage’ Motherhood. Journal of Youth Studies, 8(1), 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500063702
McKibben, B. (2004). Enough: genetic engineering and the end of human nature. Bloomsbury.
McLean, S., & Elliston, S. (2013). Regulating pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a comparative and theoretical analysis: Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9780203096376
McLean, S., & Elliston, S. (Eds.). (2014). Regulating pre-implantation genetic diagnosis: a comparative and theoretical analysis: Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Meerabeau, L. (1991). Husbands’ participation in fertility treatment: they also serve who only stand and wait. Sociology of Health and Illness, 13(3), 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10492399
Mendes, K., & Silva, K. (2015). Feminist erasures: challenging backlash culture [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137454928
Mette N. Svendsen and Lene Koch. (2008). Unpacking the ‘Spare Embryo’: Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape. Social Studies of Science, 38(1), 93–110. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25474566?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Millar, I. M., Paulson-Ellis, C., & British Association for Adoption & Fostering. (2009). Exploring infertility issues in adoption: Vol. Good practice guide. British Association for Adoption & Fostering.
Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & te Velde, E. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6), 848–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026
Mitochondria Replacement Consultations: Advice to Government. (n.d.). http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/HFEA_Authority_meeting_March_2013_-_Mitchondria_report.pdf
Mollborn, S. (2007). Making the Best of a Bad Situation: Material Resources and Teenage Parenthood. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69(1), 92–104.
Mollborn, S., & Jacobs, J. (2012). "We’ll Figure a Way”: Teenage Mothers’ Experiences in Shifting Social and Economic Contexts. Qualitative Sociology, 35(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9213-1
Moore, L. J. (2007). Sperm counts: overcome by man’s most precious fluid: Vol. Intersections. New York University Press.
Morgan, D. (1994). Surrogacy Issue: Who Is the Other Mother, The. International Journal of Law and the Family, 8(3), 386–412. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlpf8&id=396
Morgan, P. M. & Institute of Economic Affairs (Great Britain). Health and Welfare Unit. (1999). Adoption: the continuing debate: Vol. no. 53. IEA Health and Welfare Unit.
Mortimore, C. (1994). Immigration and adoption: Vol. GEMS. Trentham Books and School of Oriental & African Studies.
Mothers Over 40. (n.d.). http://www.mothersover40.com/home.html
Nahman, M. (2006). Materializing Israeliness: Difference and mixture in transnational ova donation. Science as Culture, 15(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430600890669
Nahman, M. (2008). Nodes of Desire: Romanian Egg Sellers, `Dignity’ and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 15(2), 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807088068
Nahman, M. R. (2013a). Extractions: An ethnography of reproductive tourism: Vol. Global ethics [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291752
Nahman, M. R. (2013b). Extractions: an ethnography of reproductive tourism: Vol. Globath ethics series. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291752
Nash, M. (Ed.). (2014a). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan.
Nash, M. (2014b). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
Nash, M. (Ed.). (2014c). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
Nash, M. (2014d). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
Nash, M. (Ed.). (2014e). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
Nash, M. (2014f). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
Nash, M. (Ed.). (2014g). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
Nash, M. (2014h). Reframing reproduction: conceiving gendered experiences: Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139
National Gamete Donation Trust. (n.d.). http://www.ngdt.co.uk/
NICE 2013 Guideline on Fertility. (n.d.). NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG156
Norton, W., Hudson, N., & Culley, L. (2013). Gay men seeking surrogacy to achieve parenthood. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 27(3), 271–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.016
Nurture: Stories of New Midlife Mothers. (n.d.). http://www.midlifemothers.org/
Oakley, A. (1993). Essays on women, medicine and health: Vol. Edinburgh education and society. Edinburgh University Press.
One at a Time. (2014). One at a time campaign. http://www.oneatatime.org.uk/
OPTS - The Organization of Parents Through Surrogacy. (n.d.). http://www.opts.com/
Overboe, J. (2007). Disability and Genetics: Affirming the Bare Life (the State of Exception). Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology (Online)
The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. [Electronic Resource] : Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’anthropologie.
Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology (Online)
Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’anthropologie
CRSA/RCSA, 44(2), 219–235.
Pande, A. (2010). Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker. Signs, 35(4), 969–992. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/651043?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Parens, E., & Asch, A. (2000). Prenatal testing and disability rights: Vol. Hastings Center studies in ethics. Georgetown University Press.
Park, S. M. (2006). Adoptive Maternal Bodies: A Queer Paradigm for Rethinking Mothering? Hypatia, 21(1), 201–226. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3811085?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Parry, S. (2003). The politics of cloning: mapping the rhetorical convergence of embryos and stem cells in parliamentary debates. New Genetics and Society, 22(2), 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677032000102594
Parry, S. (2006). (Re)constructing embryos in stem cell research: Exploring the meaning of embryos for people involved in fertility treatments. Social Science & Medicine, 62(10), 2349–2359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.024
Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Polity. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3442629
People’s Health Movement. (n.d.). http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7146
Perrier, M. (2013). No right time: the significance of reproductive timing for younger and older mothers’ moralities. The Sociological Review, 61(1), 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12005
Petersen, A. (2001). Biofantasies: genetics and medicine in the print news media. Social Science & Medicine, 52(8), 1255–1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00229-X
Pfeffer, N. (1993). The stork and the syringe: a political history of reproductive medicine: Vol. Feminist perspectives. Polity Press.
Phillips, A. (2011). It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It: Bodies as Objects and Property. Political Theory, 39(6), 724–748. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41502590?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Phillips, A. (2013a). Our bodies, whose property? Princeton University Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685
Phillips, A. (2013b). Our bodies, whose property? [Electronic resource]. Princeton University Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685
Phillips, A. (2013c). Our bodies, whose property? Princeton University Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SOur%20bodies%2C%20whose%20propertyPw%3D%3D__Ff%3Afacetmediatype%3Ah%3Ah%3AE-Book%3A%3A__Orightresult__U__X0?lang=eng&suite=cobalt
Phillips, A. (2013d). Our bodies, whose property? [Electronic resource]. Princeton University Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685
Phoenix, A. (1991). Young mothers? Vol. Family life series. Polity Press.
Piepmeier, A. (2013). The Inadequacy of ‘Choice’: Disability and What’s Wrong with Feminist Framings of Reproduction. Feminist Studies, 39(1), 159–186. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23719307?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Ragoné, H. (1994). Surrogate motherhood: conception in the heart: Vol. Institutional structures of feeling. Westview Press.
Ragone, H. (2000). Of Likeness and Difference: How Race Is Being Transformed by Gestational Surrogacy. In Ideologies and technologies of motherhood: race, class, sexuality, nationalism (pp. 56–75). Routledge. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/so/so231/ragone_h_2000.pdf
Ramey, S. L. (2001). Interwoven lives: adolescent mothers and their children: Vol. Research monographs in adolescence (T. L. Whitman, Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
RCOG statement on later maternal age. (9 C.E.). https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-statement-on-later-maternal-age/
Richards, M., Pennings, G., & Appleby, J. B. (2012a). Reproductive donation: practice, policy, and bioethics. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, M., Pennings, G., & Appleby, J. B. (Eds.). (2012b). Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026390
Riggs, D. W. (2011). "Let’s Go to the Movies”: Filmic Representations of Gay Foster and Adoptive Parents. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 7(3), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2011.564948
Riggs, D. W., & Due, C. (2014). "The Contented Faces of a Unique Australian Family”: Privilege and Vulnerability in News Media Reporting of Offshore Surrogacy Arrangements. Feminist Media Studies, 14(5), 869–872. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.952874
Roberts, C., & Throsby, K. (2008). Paid to share: IVF patients, eggs and stem cell research. Social Science & Medicine, 66(1), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.011
Roberts, D. E. (1999a). Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty (1st Vintage ed). Vintage.
Roberts, D. E. (1999b). Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty (1st Vintage ed). Vintage.
Roberts, D. E. (1999c). Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty (1st Vintage ed). Vintage.
Roberts, E. F. S. (2012). God’s laboratory: assisted reproduction in the Andes. University of California Press.
ROCK, P. J. (1996). Eugenics and Euthanasia: A cause for concern for disabled people, particularly disabled women. Disability & Society, 11(1), 121–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023399
Rolfe, A. (2008). ‘You’ve got to grow up when you’ve got a kid’: Marginalized young women’s accounts of motherhood. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18(4), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.925
Rosenthal, J. L., Zimmermann, R. C., & Sauer, M. V. (1997). P-180 The desire for childbearing in women of advanced reproductive age: Findings in a donor oocyte program. Fertility and Sterility, 68, S179–S180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)90995-X
Rothblatt, M. A. (1997). Unzipped genes: taking charge of baby-making in the new millennium: Vol. America in transition. Temple University Press.
Roundtable: Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Justice. (n.d.). Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies, 34(3), 102–125. http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/frontiers/v034/34.3.briggs.html
Rowland, R. (1992). Living laboratories: women and reproductive technology. Lime Tree.
Saetnan, A. R., Oudshoorn, N., & Kirejczyk, M. S. M. (2000). Bodies of technology: women’s involvement with reproductive medicine: Vol. Women and health : cultural and social perspectives. Ohio State University Press.
Sales, S. (2012a). Adoption, family and the paradox of origins: a Foucauldian history: Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230363281
Sales, S. (2012b). Adoption, family and the paradox of origins: A Foucauldian history: Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230363281
Sales, S. (2015). Contested attachments: rethinking adoptive kinship in the era of open adoption. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12062
Schofield, G. (1994). The youngest mothers: the experience of pregnancy and motherhood among young women of school age. Avebury.
Selman, P. & British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering. (2000). Intercountry adoption: developments, trends and perspectives. British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.
Selman, P., & Glendinning, C. (1994). Teenage Pregnancy and Social Policy. Youth and Policy, 47(5), 39–58.
Sevon, E. (2005). Timing Motherhood: Experiencing and Narrating the Choice to Become a Mother. Feminism & Psychology, 15(4), 461–482. http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/0959-353505057619
Seymour, N. (2007). In black and white. BAAF.
Shakespeare, T. (1999). ‘Losing the plot’? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(5), 669–688. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00178
Shaw, R. (2008). Rethinking Reproductive Gifts as Body Projects. Sociology, 42(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507084823
Shaw, R. L., & Giles, D. C. (2009). Motherhood on ice? A media framing analysis of older mothers in the UK news. Psychology & Health, 24(2), 221–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701601625
Shelton, N., & Johnson, S. (2006). ‘I think motherhood for me was a bit like a double-edged sword’: the narratives of older mothers. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16(4), 316–330. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.867
Silliman, J. M., Fried, M. G., Ross, L., & Gutiérrez, E. R. (2004). Undivided rights: women of color organize for reproductive justice. South End Press.
Silva, K. (2015). Feminist erasures: challenging backlash culture (K. Mendes, Ed.). Palgrave Macmillian.
Simon, R. J., & Altstein, H. (2002). Adoption, race, & identity: from infancy to young adulthood (2nd ed). Transaction Publishers.
Simon, R. J., Altstein, H., & Melli, M. S. (1994). The case for transracial adoption. American University Press.
SisterSong | Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective. (n.d.). http://sistersong.net/
Smith, M. K. (2013). The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: restrictions on the creation of "saviour siblings” and the relevance of the harm principle. New Genetics and Society, 32(2), 154–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.788358
Smolin, D. M. (2006). Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnaping, and Stealing Children. Wayne Law Review, 52(1), 113–200. https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/waynlr52&id=123&collection=journals
Spallone, P. (1989). Beyond conception: the new politics of reproduction: Vol. Women in society. Macmillan Education.
Spallone, P., & Steinberg, D. L. (1987). Made to order: the myth of reproductive and genetic progress: Vol. The Athene series. Pergamon.
Stacey, M. (1992). Changing human reproduction: social science perspectives. Sage.
Stanworth, M. (1987a). Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine: Vol. Feminist perspectives. Polity in association with Blackwell.
Stanworth, M. (1987b). Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine: Vol. Feminist perspectives. Polity in association with Blackwell.
Stanworth, M. (1987c). Reproductive technologies: gender, motherhood and medicine: Vol. Feminist perspectives. Polity in association with Blackwell.
Steinberg, D. L. (1997a). Bodies in glass: genetics, eugenics, embryo ethics. Manchester University Press.
Steinberg, D. L. (1997b). A most selective practice. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00067-2
Stonewall: Adoption and Fostering. (n.d.). https://www.stonewall.org.uk/help-advice/parenting-rights/adoption-and-fostering
Strong, K., Kerridge, I., & Little, M. (2014). Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children. Bioethics, 28(4), 187–193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02001.x
Successful Parents India | Surrogacy Agency | New Delhi, India. (n.d.). http://www.findsurrogatemother.com/surrogacy-agencies/successful-parents-india-new-delhi-india_870
Sufrin, C., Kolbi-Molinas, A., & Roth, R. (2015). Reproductive Justice, Health Disparities And Incarcerated Women in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 47(4), 213–219. https://doi.org/10.1363/47e3115
Sui, S., & Sleeboom-Faulkner, M. (2010). Choosing offspring: prenatal genetic testing for thalassaemia and the production of a ‘saviour sibling’ in China. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 12(2), 167–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902914110
Surrogacy UK. (n.d.). http://www.surrogacyuk.org/
Sweden: EWL members campaign against surrogate motherhood - European Women’s Lobby. (n.d.). http://www.womenlobby.org/Sweden-EWL-members-campaign-against-surrogate-motherhood
Tabberer, S. & Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2000). Teenage pregnancy and choice: abortion or motherhood : influences on the decision. York Publishing Services for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Taylor-Sands, M. (2013a). Saviour siblings: a relational approach to the welfare of the child in selective reproduction: Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge.
Taylor-Sands, M. (2013b). Saviour siblings: a relational approach to the welfare of the child in selective reproduction: Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=542441&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
The ethics of stem cells | Wellcome Trust. (n.d.). http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Human-Fertilisation-and-Embryology-Act/Stem-cell-basics/WTD040077.htm
The Pro-Choice Public Education Project. (n.d.). http://www.protectchoice.org/index.php
The Tindall Foundation Thrive Teen Parenting Centre. (n.d.). http://tindall.org.nz/thrive-teen-parenting-centre-empowering-young-parents-to-build-thriving-families/
Thompson, C. (2005). Making parents: the ontological choreography of reproductive technologies: Vol. Inside technology. MIT.
Throsby, K. (2004a). The unaltered body?: Rethinking the body when IVF fails. Science Studies, 19(2), 77–97.
Throsby, K. (2004b). When IVF fails: feminism, infertility, and the negotiation of normality. Palgrave Macmillan. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2341631
Throsby, K. (2004c). When IVF fails: feminism, infertility and the negotiation of normality [Electronic resource]. Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42678&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Throsby, K. (2004d). ‘It’s Different for Men’: Masculinity and IVF. Men and Masculinities, 6(4), 330–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260958
Tomasovic, E. (2010). Robbed of Reproductive Justice: The Necessity of a Global Initiative to Provide Redress to Roma Women Coercively Sterilized in Eastern Europe. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 41(3), 765–824. https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/colhr41&id=771&collection=journals
Tornello, S. L., & Patterson, C. J. (2015). Timing of Parenthood and Experiences of Gay Fathers: A Life Course Perspective. Journal of GLBT Family Studies, 11(1), 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2013.878681
Trimmings, K., & Beaumont, P. (2013a). International surrogacy arrangements: Legal regulation at the international level [Electronic resource]. Hart Publishing Ltd. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000810.html
Trimmings, K., & Beaumont, P. R. (Eds.). (2013b). International surrogacy arrangements: legal regulation at the international level: Vol. Studies in private international law. Hart Publishing. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2749248
Turney, J. (1998). Frankenstein’s footsteps: science, genetics and popular culture. Yale University Press.
Tutton, R. (2002). Gift Relationships in Genetics Research. Science as Culture, 11(4), 523–542. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950543022000028965
Twine, F. W. (2015). Outsourcing the womb: race, class, and gestational surrogacy in a global market: Vol. Framing 21st century social issues. Routledge.
Unnithan, M., & Pigg, S. L. (2014). Sexual and reproductive health rights and justice – tracking the relationship. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 16(10), 1181–1187. https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=Sexual+and+reproductive+health+rights+and+justice--tracking+the+relationship.&title=Culture,+Health+&+Sexuality&aufirst=&auinit=&aulast=M&issn=14645351&eissn=&coden=&volume=16&issue=10&spage=1181&epage=&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3
van Niekerk, A., & van Zyl, L. (1995). The Ethics of Surrogacy: Women’s Reproductive Labour. Journal of Medical Ethics, 21(6), 345–349. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27717666?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
van Zyl, L., & van Niekerk, A. (2000). Interpretations, Perspectives and Intentions in Surrogate Motherhood. Journal of Medical Ethics, 26(5), 404–409. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27718578?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Vora, K. (2012). Limits of "Labor”: Accounting for Affect and the Biological in Transnational Surrogacy and Service Work. South Atlantic Quarterly, 111(4), 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1724138 10.1215/00382876-1724138
Wade, P. (2007a). Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics: Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. Berghahn Books.
Wade, P. (2007b). Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics: Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. Berghahn Books.
Wade, P. (2007c). Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics: Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. Berghahn Books.
Wade, P. (2007d). Race, ethnicity and nation: perspectives from kinship and genetics: Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. Berghahn Books.
Waldby, C. (2008). Oocyte markets: women’s reproductive work in embryonic stem cell research. New Genetics and Society, 27(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770701843576
Waldby, C., & Cooper, M. (n.d.). From Reproductive Work to Regenerative Labour: The Female Body and the Stem Cell Industries’. Feminist Theory, 11(1), 3–22.
Weed, K., Nicholson, J. S., & Farris, J. R. (2015). Teen pregnancy and parenting: rethinking the myths and misperceptions: Vol. Routledge advances in health and social policy [Electronic resource]. Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9780203079607
Weise, J. (1988). Transracial adoption: a black perspective: Vol. Social work monograph. Social Work Monographs.
Williams, C., Kitzinger, J., & Henderson, L. (2003). Envisaging the embryo in stem cell research: rhetorical strategies and media reporting of the ethical debates. Sociology of Health and Illness, 25(7), 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00370.x
Wilson, A. R. (2013). Situating intersectionality: Politics, policy, and power: Vol. The politics of intersectionality. Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137025135
WILSON, H., & HUNTINGTON, A. (2005). Deviant (M)others: The Construction of Teenage Motherhood in Contemporary Discourse. Journal of Social Policy, 35(01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405009335
Winkelman, W. D., Missmer, S. A., Myers, D., & Ginsburg, E. S. (2015). Public perspectives on the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 32(5), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0456-8
Yamin, A. E., & Boulanger, V. M. (2013). Embedding sexual and reproductive health and rights in a transformational development framework: lessons learned from the MDG targets and indicators. Reproductive Health Matters, 21(42), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(13)42727-1
Yamin, A. E., & Boulanger, V. M. (2014). Why Global Goals and Indicators Matter: The Experience of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the Millennium Development Goals. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 15(2–3), 218–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2014.896322
Yngvesson, B. (2010). Belonging in an adopted world: race, identity, and transnational adoption: Vol. The Chicago series in law and society. The University of Chicago Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3099465
Younes, M. N., & Klein, S. A. (2014). The International Adoption Experience: Do They Live Happily Ever After? Adoption Quarterly, 17(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2014.875090
Zucker, A. N. (2014). Reproductive Justice: More Than Choice. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 14(1), 210–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12059
