Bibliography for SO231: Transformations: Gender, Reproduction and Contemporary Society (Weeks 14-25) BETA

Aarvold, J, and C Buswell. 1999. ‘Very Young Motherhood: Whose Problem’. Youth and Policy 64: 1–14.

Aboderin, Isabella. 2014. ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights of Older Men and Women: Addressing a Policy Blind Spot’. Reproductive Health Matters 22 (44): 185–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(14)44814-6.

‘Adoption UK’. n.d. http://www.adoptionuk.org/.

Allen, Isobel, Shirley Bourke Dowling, Heather Rolfe, and Policy Studies Institute. 1998. Teenage Mothers: Decisions and Outcomes. Vol. Report. London: Policy Studies Institute.

‘Alliance for Justice’. n.d. http://www.afj.org/campaigns/reproductive-justice-roe-at-risk.

Almeling, Rene. 2006. ‘“Why Do You Want to Be a Donor?”: Gender and the Production of Altruism in Egg and Sperm Donation’. New Genetics and Society 25 (2): 143–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770600855184.

———. 2011. Sex Cells: The Medical Market for Eggs and Sperm. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Almeling, Rene. n.d. ‘Selling Genes, Selling Gender: Egg Agencies, Sperm Banks, and the Medical Market in Genetic Material’. American Sociological Review 72 (3): 319–40. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/218831869?accountid=14888.

Andrews, Lori B. 2000. The Clone Age: Adventures in the New World of Reproductive Technology. FirstOwl Books edition. New York: Henry Holt.

Anne Phillips. 2011. ‘It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It: Bodies as Objects and Property’. Political Theory 39 (6): 724–48. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41502590?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Arditti, Rita, Renate D. Klein, and Shelley Minden. 1989. Test-Tube Women: What Future for Motherhood? London: Pandora.

ATKIN, KARL. 2003. ‘Ethnicity and the Politics of the New Genetics: Principles and Engagement’. Ethnicity & Health 8 (2): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557850303561.

Atwood, Margaret. 1996. The Handmaid’s Tale. London: Vintage.

‘Bad Reputation’. n.d. https://badreputation.org.uk/2011/03/02/reproductive-justice-in-the-uk-part-1/.

BAILEY, ALISON. 2011a. ‘Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy’. Hypatia 26 (4): 715–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x.

———. 2011b. ‘Reconceiving Surrogacy: Toward a Reproductive Justice Account of Indian Surrogacy’. Hypatia 26 (4): 715–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01168.x.

Baslington, Hazel. 1996. ‘Anxiety Overflow’. Women’s Studies International Forum 19 (6): 675–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00088-X.

Bergman, Kim, Ritchie J. Rubio, Robert-Jay Green, and Elena Padrón. 2010. ‘Gay Men Who Become Fathers via Surrogacy: The Transition to Parenthood’. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 6 (2): 111–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15504281003704942.

Bhabha, J. 2004. ‘Moving Babies: Globaliziation, Markets and Transational Adoption’. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 28 (2): 181–98. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/forwa28&id=419&collection=journals&index=journals/forwa.

Bharadwaj, Aditya. 2003. ‘Why Adoption Is Not an Option in India: The Visibility of Infertility, the Secrecy of Donor Insemination, and Other Cultural Complexities’. Social Science & Medicine 56 (9): 1867–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00210-1.

Birke, Lynda I. A., Gail Vines, and Susan Himmelweit. 1990. Tomorrow’s Child: Reproductive Technologies in the 90s. London: Virago.

‘Black Families and Adoption - the Debate.’ n.d. BBC - London. http://www.bbc.co.uk/london/content/articles/2007/09/14/blacklondon_feature.shtml.

Breheny, Mary, and Christine Stephens. 2007. ‘Individual Responsibility and Social Constraint: The Construction of Adolescent Motherhood in Social Scientific Research’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 9 (4): 333–46. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20460936?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Briggs, Laura. 2003. ‘Mother, Child, Race, Nation: The Visual Iconography of Rescue and the Politics of Transnational and Transracial Adoption’. Gender  History 15 (2): 179–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0424.00298.

‘Bubbalicious: The Place for Young Parents’. n.d. http://www.bubbalicious.co.uk/?gclid=CLLKqtOH5LkCFcbLtAod1SkAcw.

Bullen, Elizabeth, Jane Kenway, and Valerie Hay. 2000. ‘New Labour, Social Exclusion and Educational Risk Management: The Case of “Gymslip Mums”’. British Educational Research Journal 26 (4): 441–56. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1501386?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Burfoot, Annette. 1995. ‘In-Appropriation — a Critique of Proceed With Care’. Women’s Studies International Forum 18 (4): 499–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-5395(95)80039-R.

Byrne, B. 2006. ‘In Search of a “Good Mix”: “Race”, Class, Gender and Practices of Mothering’. Sociology 40 (6): 1001–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038506069841.

Cahn, Naomi R. 2013. The New Kinship: Constructing Donor-Conceived Families. Vol. Families, law, and society series. New York: New York University Press.

‘Campaign To End Sex Selection’. n.d. http://www.cwpe.org/initiatives/sexselection.

Campion, Mukti Jain. 1995a. Who’s Fit to Be a Parent? London: Routledge. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2687598.

———. 1995b. Who’s Fit to Be a Parent? Electronic resource. London: Routledge. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&db=nlabk&AN=134658.

Carolan, Mary. 2005. ‘"Doing It Properly”: The Experience of First Mothering Over 35 Years’. Health Care for Women International 26 (9): 764–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399330500230987.

Carvalho, João Eduardo Coin de. 2007. ‘How Can a Child Be a Mother? Discourse on Teenage Pregnancy in a Brazilian’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 9 (2): 109–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050600994448.

‘Childrens Hope International Chinese Adoption Agency’. n.d. http://www.chinaadoptionagency.com/.

Chrisler, Joan C. 2012a. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger.

———. 2012b. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Electronic resource. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430.

———. 2012c. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2647316.

———. 2012d. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Electronic resource. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430.

———. 2012e. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430.

———. 2012f. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Electronic resource. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430.

———. 2012g. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=871430.

———. 2012h. Reproductive Justice: A Global Concern. Electronic resource. Vol. Women’s psychology. Santa Barbara, Calif: Praeger. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=871430.

———. 2014. ‘A Reproductive Justice Approach to Women’s Health’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 14 (1): 205–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12056.

Conaway, Laura. 2007. ‘White Kid, Black Family: Transracial Adoption’. http://www.npr.org/sections/bryantpark/2007/11/white_kid_black_family_transra.html.

Conn, Peter. 2013. Adoption: A Brief Social and Cultural History. Electronic resource. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137333919.

Conn, Peter J. 2013. Adoption: A Brief Social and Cultural History. First edition. Vol. Palgrave Pivot. New York, N.Y.: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137333919.

Cook, Rachel, Shelley Day Sclater, and Felicity Kaganas. 2003a. Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives. Oxford: Hart.

———. 2003b. Surrogate Motherhood: International Perspectives. Oxford: Hart.

‘Coram’. n.d. http://www.coram.org.uk/.

Corea, Gena. 1988a. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial  Insemination to Artificial Wombs. London: Women’s Press.

———. 1988b. The Mother Machine: Reproductive Technologies from Artificial  Insemination to Artificial Wombs. London: Women’s Press.

Corea, Gena and International Interdisciplinary Congress on Women. 1987. Man-Made Women: How New Reproductive Technologies Affect Women. 1st Midland book ed. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

‘Cots’. n.d. http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/.

‘COTS UK (Surrogacy Support Group)’. n.d. http://www.surrogacy.org.uk/.

‘Council for Responsible Genetics’. n.d. http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/Help/About.aspx.

Cretney, Stephen Michael, Rebecca Probert, and Chris Barton. 2012. Fifty Years in Family Law: Essays for Stephen Cretney. Cambridge: Intersentia.

Culley, Lorraine, Nicky Hudson, and Floor Van Rooij. 2009. Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and Reproductive Technologies. Electronic resource. Vol. Science in society series. London: Earthscan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=217074&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.

———, eds. 2013. Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and Reproductive Technologies. Vol. Earthscan science in society series. London: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=217074&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.

CUTAS, DANIELA. 2007. ‘POSTMENOPAUSAL MOTHERHOOD: IMMORAL, ILLEGAL? A CASE STUDY’. Bioethics 21 (8): 458–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2007.00583.x.

Daniels, Ken R., Gillian M. Lewis, and Wayne Gillett. 1995. ‘Telling Donor Insemination Offspring about Their Conception: The Nature of Couples’ Decision-Making’. Social Science & Medicine 40 (9): 1213–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(94)00251-N.

DasGupta, Sayantani, and Shamita Das Dasgupta, eds. 2014. Globalization and Transnational Surrogacy in India: Outsourcing Life. Lanham, Maryland: Lexington Books.

‘Decentering the Individual and Centering Community: Using a Reproductive Justice Methodology to Examine the Uses of Reprogenetics’. n.d. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34 (3): 213–25. http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/frontiers/v034/34.3.jesudason.html.

Deech, Ruth, and Anna Smajdor. 2007a. From IVF to Immortality: Controversy in the Era of Reproductive Technology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

———. 2007b. From IVF to Immortality: Controversy in the Era of Reproductive Technology. Electronic resource. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199219780.001.0001.

DeGrazia, David. 2012. Creation Ethics: Genetics, Reproduction, and Quality of Life. Electronic resource. New York: Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195389630.001.0001.

Denny, Elaine. 1994. ‘Liberation or Oppression? Radical Feminism and in Vitro Fertilisation.’ Sociology of Health and Illness 16 (1): 62–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep11347010.

Dorothy E. Roberts. 2009. ‘Race, Gender, and Genetic Technologies: A New Reproductive Dystopia?’ Signs 34 (4): 783–804. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/597132?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Dorow, Sara K. 2006. Transnational Adoption: A Cultural Economy of Race, Gender, and Kinship. Vol. Nation of newcomers. New York: New York University Press.

Dowrick, Stephanie, and Sibyl Grundberg. 1980. Why Children? London: The Women’s Press.

Duncan, Simon. 2005. ‘Mothering, Class and Rationality’. The Sociological Review 53 (1): 50–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2005.00503.x.

Duncan, Simon, Rosalind Edwards, and Claire E. Alexander. 2010. Teenage Parenthood: What’s the Problem? London: Tufnell Press.

Dunk-West, Priscilla, and Trish Hafford-Letchfield. 2011a. Sexual Identities and Sexuality in Social Work: Research and Reflections from Women in the Field. Vol. Contemporary social work studies. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2586208.

———. 2011b. Sexual Identities and Sexuality in Social Work: Research and Reflections from Women in the Field. Electronic resource. Vol. Contemporary social work studies. Farnham: Ashgate. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=304747&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.

Earle, Sarah, Carol Komaromy, and Linda L. Layne. 2012a. Understanding Reproductive Loss: Perspectives on Life, Death and Fertility. Farham, Surrey, England: Ashgate. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2655848.

———. 2012b. Understanding Reproductive Loss: Perspectives on Life, Death and Fertility. Electronic resource. Farham: Ashgate. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781409428114.

Earle, Sarah, and Gayle Letherby. 2007. ‘Conceiving Time? Women Who Do or Do Not Conceive’. Sociology of Health & Illness 29 (2): 233–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.00546.x.

Edwards, Jeanette. 1999. Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.

Edwards, Mark Evan. 2002. ‘Education and Occupations: Reexamining the Conventional Wisdom about Later First Births among American Mothers’. Sociological Forum 17 (3): 423–43. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3070349?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Ehrich, Kathryn, Clare Williams, and Bobbie Farsides. 2008. ‘The Embryo as Moral Work Object: PGD/IVF Staff Views and Experiences’. Sociology of Health & Illness 30 (5): 772–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2008.01083.x.

Ettorre, E. 2000. ‘Reproductive Genetics, Gender and the Body: `Please Doctor, May I Have a Normal Baby?’’. Sociology 34 (3): 403–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/S0038038500000262.

Evans, Roy, Helen S. Holgate, and Francis K. O. Yuen. 2006. Teenage Pregnancy and Parenthood: Global Perspectives, Issues and Interventions. London: Routledge.

Farquhar, Dion. 1996a. The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies. Vol. Thinking gender. New York: Routledge.

———. 1996b. The Other Machine: Discourse and Reproductive Technologies. Vol. Thinking gender. New York: Routledge.

‘Fertility Fairness’. n.d. http://www.fertilityfairness.co.uk/.

‘Find Surrogate Mothers’. n.d. http://www.findsurrogatemother.com/.

Fineman, Martha, and Karen Worthington. 2009. What Is Right for Children?: The Competing Paradigms of Religion and Human Rights. Farnham, Surrey, England: Ashgate.

‘FINRRAGE’. n.d. http://www.finrrage.org/.

‘———’. n.d. http://www.finrrage.org/.

‘———’. n.d. http://www.finrrage.org/.

Fogg-Davis, Hawley Grace. 2002. The Ethics of Transracial Adoption. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

‘Following Young Fathers’. n.d. http://followingfathers.leeds.ac.uk/.

Franklin, S. 2001. ‘Culturing Biology: Cell Lines for the Second Millennium’. Health: 5 (3): 335–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136345930100500304.

Franklin, Sarah. 1997a. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. London: Routledge. http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/warw/detail.action?docID=180137.

———. 1997b. Embodied Progress: A Cultural Account of Assisted Conception. Electronic resource. London: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=32286&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.

Franklin, Sarah, and Margaret M. Lock. 2003. Remaking Life & Death: Toward an Anthropology of the Biosciences. 1st ed. Vol. School of American Research advanced seminar series. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Franklin, Sarah, and Susan McKinnon. 2001. Relative Values: Reconfiguring Kinship Studies. London: Duke University Press.

Franklin, Sarah, and Celia Roberts. 2006. Born and Made: An Ethnography of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Vol. In-formation series. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Fukuyama, Francis. 2002. Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

‘Full Service, Worldwide Surrogate-Parenting Agency | Circle Surrogacy’. n.d. http://www.circlesurrogacy.com/.

Fuller, Sylvia, Paul Kershaw, and Jane Pulkingham. 2008. ‘Constructing “Active Citizenship”: Single Mothers, Welfare, and the Logics of Voluntarism’. Citizenship Studies 12 (2): 157–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020801900119.

Gaber, Ivor, and Jane Aldridge. 1994. In the Best Interests of the Child: Culture, Identity and  Transracial Adoption. London: Free Association Books.

Germain, Adrienne, Gita Sen, Claudia Garcia-Moreno, and Mridula Shankar. 2015. ‘Advancing Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Implications for the Post-2015 Global Development Agenda’. Global Public Health 10 (2): 137–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2014.986177.

Gill, Owen, and Barbara Jackson. 1983. Adoption and Race: Black, Asian and Mixed Race Children in White  Families. Vol. Child care policy and practice. London: Batsford Academic and Educational in association with British Agencies for Adoption & Fostering.

‘Global Thematic Campaign on Gender and Reproductive Justice | People’s Health Movement’. n.d. http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7146.

Godon, Danielle E., Whitney F. Green, and Patricia G. Ramsey. 2014. ‘Transracial Adoptees: The Search for Birth Family and the Search for Self’. Adoption Quarterly 17 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2014.875087.

Goldfarb, James M., ed. 2014. Third-Party Reproduction: A Comprehensive Guide. New York: Springer. http://0-link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-4614-7169-1.

Gosden, R. G. 1999. Designer Babies: The Brave New World of Reproductive Technology. London: Phoenix.

Grace, Victoria M., Ken R. Daniels, and Wayne Gillett. 2008. ‘The Donor, the Father, and the Imaginary Constitution of the Family: Parents’ Constructions in the Case of Donor Insemination’. Social Science & Medicine 66 (2): 301–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.029.

Greenfield, J, and S Jennings. 1995. ‘From Surrogacy to Contested Adoption: What Went Wrong?’ Adoption and Fostering 19 (4): 34–40. http://0-aaf.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/content/19/4/34.abstract.

Gregson Higginson, Joanna. 1998. ‘Competitive Parenting: The Culture of Teen Mothers’. Journal of Marriage and Family 60 (1): 135–49. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/353447?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Grown, Caren, Elissa Braunstein, and Anju Malhotra. 2006. Trading Women’s Health and Rights?: Trade Liberalization and Reproductive Health in Developing Economies. London: Zed Books.

Hadfield, L., N. Rudoe, and J. Sanderson‐Mann. 2007. ‘Motherhood, Choice and the British Media: A Time to Reflect’. Gender and Education 19 (2): 255–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540250601166100.

‘Hands Off Our Ovaries’. n.d. http://www.handsoffourovaries.com/.

Handwerker, Lisa. 1995. ‘Social and Ethical Implications of In Vitro Fertilization in Contemporary China’. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (03). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180100006101.

———. 2003. ‘New Genetic Technologies and Their Impact on Women: A Feminist Perspective’. Gender & Development 11 (1): 114–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/741954261.

Hanson, F. Allan. 2001. ‘Donor Insemination: Eugenic and Feminist Implications’. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 15 (3): 287–311. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/649581?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Harford, Tim. n.d. ‘More or Less, How Long Can You Wait to Have a Baby?’ Edited by Ruth Alexander. BBC Radio 4. http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b039rwd0.

Hargreaves, Katrina. 2006. ‘Constructing Families and Kinship through Donor Insemination’. Sociology of Health and Illness 28 (3): 261–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2006.00492.x.

Hartouni, Valerie. 1997a. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.

———. 1997b. Cultural Conceptions: On Reproductive Technologies and the Remaking of Life. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.

Hawkes, Gail. 1995. ‘Responsibility and Irresponsibility: Young Women and Family Planning’. Sociology 29 (2): 257–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038595029002005.

Heather Widdows. 2009. ‘Border Disputes across Bodies: Exploitation in Trafficking for Prostitution and Egg Sale for Stem Cell Research’. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2 (1): 5–24. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40339192?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Heilborn, Maria Luiza, Elaine Reis Brandão, and Cristiane Da Silva Cabral. 2007. ‘Teenage Pregnancy and Moral Panic in Brazil’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 9 (4): 403–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050701369441.

Heilborn, Maria Luiza, Elaine Reis Brandão, and Cristiane Da Silva Cabral. 2007. ‘Teenage Pregnancy and Moral Panic in Brazil’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 9 (4): 403–14. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/20460941?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Hicks, Stephen. 2005. ‘Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption: A Brief UK History’. Adoption and Fostering 29 (3): 42–56. http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/030857590502900306.

———. 2011a. Lesbian, Gay, and Queer Parenting: Families, Intimacies, Genealogies. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2587338.

———. 2011b. Lesbian, Gay and Queer Parenting: Families, Intimacies, Genealogies. Electronic resource. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230348592.

Hicks, Stephen, and Janet McDermott. 1999. Lesbian and Gay Fostering and Adoption: Extraordinary yet Ordinary. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Hirsch, Marianne, and Evelyn Fox Keller. 1990. Conflicts in Feminism. New York: Routledge.

Hochschild, Arlie. 2011. ‘Emotional Life on the Market Frontier’. Annual Review of Sociology 37 (1): 21–33. https://0-www-jstor-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41288597?seq=1#metadata_info_tab_contents.

Horsey, Kirsty, ed. 2015a. Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315767895.

———. 2015b. Revisiting the Regulation of Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Electronic resource. Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. London: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315767895.

Howell, Signe. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective. New York: Berghahn.

Hudson, Frances, and Bernard Ineichen. 1991. Taking It Lying down: Sexuality and Teenage Motherhood. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.

Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, Strategy and Information Directorate, Web team,. n.d. ‘Donation Reviews and Consultations - HFEA’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/513.html.

———. n.d. ‘Embryo Research in the UK - HFEA’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/158.html.

———. n.d. ‘Genetic Testing - HFEA’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/172.html.

———. n.d. ‘HFEA - Fertility, Infertility, IVF, Embryo Research -’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/.

———. n.d. ‘HFEA Code of Practice: Guidance Note 12. Egg Sharing Arrangements (Version 2.0)’. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority, 21 Bloomsbury Street, London, WC1B 3HF. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/499.html.

———. n.d. ‘National Donation Strategy Group’. Human Fertilisation & Embryology Authority, Finsbury Tower 103-105, Bunhill Row, London, EC1Y 8HF. http://www.altrui.co.uk/2012/05/03/hfea-national-donation-strategy-group/.

‘Human Genetics Alert’. n.d. http://www.hgalert.org/.

Humphrey, Michael, and Heather Humphrey. 1993. Inter-Country Adoption: Practical Experiences. London: Tavistock/Routledge.

Inanc, Hande. n.d. ‘Unemployment and the Timing of Parenthood: Implications of Partnership Status and Partner’s Employment’. Demographic Research 32: 219–50. http://www.demographic-research.org/volumes/vol32/7/.

Inhorn, M. C. 2007. ‘Masturbation, Semen Collection and Men’s IVF Experiences: Anxieties in the        Muslim World’. Body & Society 13 (3): 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X07082251.

Inhorn, Marcia Claire. 2003. Local Babies, Global Science: Gender, Religion, and in Vitro Fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.

———, ed. 2009. Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity, and Reproduction. Vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books.

Inhorn, Marcia Claire, and Frank van Balen. 2002. Infertility around the Globe: New Thinking on Childlessness, Gender, and Reproductive Technologies. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.

Inhorn, Marcia Claire, Maruska la Cour Mosegaard, Tine Tjørnhøj-Thomsen, and Helene Oppenheimer. 2009. Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity, and Reproduction. Vol. Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780857455369.

Inhorn, Marcia Claire, and Soraya Tremayne. 2012a. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives. Vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books.

———. 2012b. Islam and Assisted Reproductive Technologies: Sunni and Shia Perspectives. Vol. Fertility, reproduction and sexuality. New York: Berghahn Books.

‘International  Adoption’. n.d. http://www.internationaladoptionnet.org/.

Jackson, Emily. 2001. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology, and Autonomy. Electronic resource. Oxford: Hart Pub. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000222.html.

Jackson, Emily M. 2001. Regulating Reproduction: Law, Technology and Autonomy. Oxford: Hart. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2558274.

James, Veronica, and Jonathan Gabe. 1996. Health and the Sociology of Emotions. Vol. Sociology of health and illness monograph series. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.

Jarman, Michelle. 2015. ‘Relations of Abortion: Crip Approaches to Reproductive Justice’. Feminist Formations 27 (1): 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2015.0008.

Jaworski, Beth K. 2009. ‘Reproductive Justice and Media Framing: A Case‐study Analysis of Problematic Frames in the Popular Media’. Sex Education 9 (1): 105–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681810802639830.

Joffe, Carole E., and Jennifer A. Reich. 2015a. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2808874.

———. 2015b. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Electronic resource. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

———. 2015c. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

———. 2015d. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Electronic resource. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

———. 2015e. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

———. 2015f. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Electronic resource. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

———. 2015g. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, NY: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

———. 2015h. Reproduction and Society: Interdisciplinary Readings. Electronic resource. Vol. Perspectives on gender. New York, N.Y.: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9781315754222.

Kauffman, Linda S. 1993a. American Feminist Thought at Century’s End: A Reader. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

———. 1993b. American Feminist Thought at Century’s End: A Reader. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell.

Kay, Jackie. 1991. The Adoption Papers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Bloodaxe.

Kerr, Anne. n.d. Genetic Politics : From Eugenics to Genome / Anne Kerr and Tom  Shakespeare ; with Cartoon by Suzy Varty. http://webcat.warwick.ac.uk/search/Y?searchtype=t&SORT=D&searcharg=Genetic+Politics%3A+from+Eugenics+to+Genome&searchscope=1.

Kidger, J. 2005. ‘Stories of Redemption? Teenage Mothers as the New Sex Educators’. Sexualities 8 (4): 481–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460705056622.

Kiernan, Kathleen E. 1997. ‘Becoming a Young Parent: A Longitudinal Study of Associated Factors’. The British Journal of Sociology 48 (3): 406–28. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/591138?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Kirkman, Maggie. 2003. ‘Egg and Embryo Donation and the Meaning of Motherhood’. Women & Health 38 (2): 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v38n02_01.

Kirkman, Maggie, Lyn Harrison, Lynne Hillier, and Priscilla Pyett. 2001. ‘“I Know I’m Doing a Good Job”: Canonical and Autobiographical Narratives of Teenage Mothers’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 3 (3): 279–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050010026097.

Kirton, Derek. 2000. Race, Ethnicity and Adoption. Vol. Race, health, and social care. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Kluger, Jeffrey, Lucy Birmingham, Ruth Davis Konigsberg, Tara Thean, Felipe Cabrera, and Krista Mahr. 2013. ‘Too Old To Be A Dad?’ Time 181 (15). http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=87000724&site=bsi-live.

Knudsen, L. 2006. ‘Introduction’. In Reproductive Rights in a Global Context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan. Nashville, Tennessee: Vanderbilt University Press, 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=89c7edce-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.

Krahn, T, and SI Wong. 2009. ‘Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Reproductive Autonomy’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 19 (January): 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60275-1.

Kuhse, Helga, and Peter Singer. 2006a. Bioethics: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

———. 2006b. Bioethics: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

———. 2006c. Bioethics: An Anthology. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell philosophy anthologies. Oxford: Blackwell Pub.

———. 2012a. A Companion to Bioethics. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

———. 2012b. A Companion to Bioethics. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell companions to philosophy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Kulczycki, Andrzej, ed. 2014. Critical Issues in Reproductive Health. Vol. Springer series on demographic methods and population analysis. Dordrecht: Springer. http://0-link.springer.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-94-007-6722-5.

L. Knudsen. 2006. ‘Introduction’. Electronic resource. In Reproductive Rights in a Global Context: South Africa, Uganda, Peru, Denmark, United States, Vietnam, Jordan. Nashville [Tenn.]: Vanderbilt University Press, 2006. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=89c7edce-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.

Lawson, Annette, and Deborah L. Rhode. 1993. The Politics of Pregnancy: Adolescent Sexuality and Public Policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Layne, Linda L. 1999. Transformative Motherhood: On Giving and Getting in a Consumer Culture. New York: New York University Press.

Lee, Ellie and Institute of Ideas. 2002. Designer Babies: Where Should We Draw the Line? Vol. Debating matters. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

LEE M. SILVER. 1999. REMAKING EDEN. Paperback. PHOENIX.

Lee, Robert G., and Derek Morgan. 2001a. Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Regulating the Reproductive  Revolution. London: Blackstone.

———. 2001b. Human Fertilisation and Embryology: Regulating the Reproductive  Revolution. London: Blackstone.

Leese, Maggie. 2014. ‘The Bumpy Road to “Becoming”: Capturing the Stories That Teenage Mothers Told about Their Journey into Motherhood’. Child & Family Social Work, September, n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12169.

Leinaweaver, Jessaca B. n.d. ‘The Quiet Migration Redux: International Adoption, Race, and Difference’. Human Organization 73 (1): 62–71. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1513353120?accountid=14888.

Leinaweaver, Jessaca, and Sonja van Wichelen. 2015. ‘The Geography of Transnational Adoption: Kin and Place in Globalization’. Social & Cultural Geography 16 (5): 499–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2015.1033449.

Lewiecki-Wilson, Cynthia, and Jen Cellio. 2011a. Disability and Mothering: Liminal Spaces of Embodied Knowledge. 1st ed. Vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166.

———. 2011b. Disability and Mothering: Liminal Spaces of Embodied Knowledge. 1st ed. Vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press.

———. 2014a. Disability and Mothering: Liminal Spaces of Embodied Knowledge. 1st ed. Vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166.

———. 2014b. Disability and Mothering: Liminal Spaces of Embodied Knowledge. 1st ed. Vol. Critical perspectives on disability. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press. http://warw.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=3410166.

‘LGBT Adoption and Fostering Week (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender)’. n.d. http://www.lgbtadoptfosterweek.org.uk/.

Lichtenberg, I., and J. LeClair. 2011. ‘Advocating Equal Protection for Men in Reproductive Rights and Responsibilities’. Southern University Law Review 38 (1): 53–78. https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/soulr38&id=57&collection=journals.

Lloyd, Eva, Ann Phoenix, and Anne Woollett. 1991. Motherhood: Meanings, Practices and Ideologies. Vol. Gender and psychology. London: Sage Publications.

Luker, Kristin. 1996. Dubious Conceptions: The Politics of Teenage Pregnancy. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Madhok, Sumi, Maya Unnithan, and Carolyn Heitmeyer. 2014. ‘On Reproductive Justice: “Domestic Violence”, Rights and the Law in India’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 16 (10): 1231–44. https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=On+reproductive+justice:+’domestic+violence’,+rights+and+the+law+in+India.&title=Culture,+Health+&+Sexuality&aufirst=&auinit=&aulast=Madhok&issn=13691058&eissn=&coden=&volume=16&issue=10&spage=1231&epage=&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3.

Maher, Jennifer. 2014. ‘Something Else Besides a Father’. Feminist Media Studies 14 (5): 853–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2013.831369.

Mandell, Betty Reid. 1973. Where Are the Children?: A Class Analysis of Foster Care and  Adoption. Vol. Lexington books. Lexington (Mass.): D.C. Heath.

Markens, Susan. 2007. Surrogate Motherhood and the Politics of Reproduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Marteau, Theresa, and Martin Richards, eds. 1996. The Troubled Helix: Social and Psychological Implications of the New Human Genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511570049.

Masson, Judith. 2001. ‘Intercountry Adoption: A Global Problem or a Global Solution.’ Journal of International Affairs 55 (1): 141–66. http://0-search.ebscohost.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5355583&site=bsi-live.

Maxwell, Maureen, and Lauren Cook. 2014. ‘The Portrayal of the Adopted Child in British Newspapers and Magazines’. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies 9 (4): 318–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2014.947350.

McDermott, Elizabeth, and Hilary Graham. 2005. ‘Resilient Young Mothering: Social Inequalities, Late Modernity and the “Problem” of “Teenage” Motherhood’. Journal of Youth Studies 8 (1): 59–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676260500063702.

McKibben, Bill. 2004. Enough: Genetic Engineering and the End of Human Nature. London: Bloomsbury.

McLean, Sheila, and Sarah Elliston. 2013. Regulating Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Electronic resource. Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Abingdon, Oxon [U.K.]: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9780203096376.

———, eds. 2014. Regulating Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

Meerabeau, Liz. 1991. ‘Husbands’ Participation in Fertility Treatment: They Also Serve Who Only Stand and Wait.’ Sociology of Health and Illness 13 (3): 396–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.ep10492399.

Mendes, Kaitlynn, and Kumarini Silva. 2015. Feminist Erasures: Challenging Backlash Culture. Electronic resource. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137454928.

Mette N. Svendsen and Lene Koch. 2008. ‘Unpacking the “Spare Embryo”: Facilitating Stem Cell Research in a Moral Landscape’. Social Studies of Science 38 (1): 93–110. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/25474566?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Millar, I. M., Christina Paulson-Ellis, and British Association for Adoption & Fostering. 2009. Exploring Infertility Issues in Adoption. Vol. Good practice guide. London: British Association for Adoption & Fostering.

Mills, M., R. R. Rindfuss, P. McDonald, and E. te Velde. 2011. ‘Why Do People Postpone Parenthood? Reasons and Social Policy Incentives’. Human Reproduction Update 17 (6): 848–60. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026.

‘Mitochondria Replacement Consultations: Advice to Government’. n.d. http://www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/HFEA_Authority_meeting_March_2013_-_Mitchondria_report.pdf.

Mollborn, Stefanie. 2007. ‘Making the Best of a Bad Situation: Material Resources and Teenage Parenthood’. Journal of Marriage and Family 69 (1): 92–104.

Mollborn, Stefanie, and Janet Jacobs. 2012. ‘"We’ll Figure a Way”: Teenage Mothers’ Experiences in Shifting Social and Economic Contexts’. Qualitative Sociology 35 (1): 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-011-9213-1.

Moore, Lisa Jean. 2007. Sperm Counts: Overcome by Man’s Most Precious Fluid. Vol. Intersections. New York: New York University Press.

Morgan, D. 1994. ‘Surrogacy Issue: Who Is the Other Mother, The’. International Journal of Law and the Family 8 (3): 386–412. http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/intlpf8&id=396.

Morgan, Patricia M. and Institute of Economic Affairs (Great Britain). Health and Welfare Unit. 1999. Adoption: The Continuing Debate. Vol. no. 53. London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit.

Mortimore, Claudia. 1994. Immigration and Adoption. Vol. GEMS. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books and School of Oriental & African Studies.

‘Mothers Over 40’. n.d. http://www.mothersover40.com/home.html.

Nahman, M. 2008. ‘Nodes of Desire: Romanian Egg Sellers, `Dignity’ and Feminist Alliances in Transnational Ova Exchanges’. European Journal of Women’s Studies 15 (2): 65–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506807088068.

Nahman, Michal. 2006. ‘Materializing Israeliness: Difference and Mixture in Transnational Ova Donation’. Science as Culture 15 (3): 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430600890669.

Nahman, Michal Rachel. 2013a. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. Vol. Globath ethics series. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291752.

———. 2013b. Extractions: An Ethnography of Reproductive Tourism. Electronic resource. Vol. Global ethics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137291752.

Nash, Meredith, ed. 2014a. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

———. 2014b. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

———, ed. 2014c. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

———. 2014d. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

———, ed. 2014e. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

———. 2014f. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

———, ed. 2014g. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

———. 2014h. Reframing Reproduction: Conceiving Gendered Experiences. Vol. Genders and sexualities in the social sciences. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137267139.

‘National Gamete Donation Trust’. n.d. http://www.ngdt.co.uk/.

‘NICE 2013 Guideline on Fertility’. n.d. NICE. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG156.

Niekerk, Anton van, and Liezl van Zyl. 1995. ‘The Ethics of Surrogacy: Women’s Reproductive Labour’. Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (6): 345–49. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27717666?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Norton, Wendy, Nicky Hudson, and Lorraine Culley. 2013. ‘Gay Men Seeking Surrogacy to Achieve Parenthood’. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 27 (3): 271–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.03.016.

‘Nurture: Stories of New Midlife Mothers’. n.d. http://www.midlifemothers.org/.

Oakley, Ann. 1993. Essays on Women, Medicine and Health. Vol. Edinburgh education and society. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

‘One at a Time’. 2014. One at a time campaign. 2014. http://www.oneatatime.org.uk/.

‘OPTS - The Organization of Parents Through Surrogacy’. n.d. http://www.opts.com/.

Overboe, J. 2007. ‘Disability and Genetics: Affirming the Bare Life (the State of Exception)’. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology (Online)  The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology. [Electronic Resource] : Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’anthropologie. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology (Online) Revue Canadienne de Sociologie et d’anthropologie CRSA/RCSA 44 (2): 219–35.

Pande, Amrita. 2010. ‘Commercial Surrogacy in India: Manufacturing a Perfect Mother‐Worker’. Signs 35 (4): 969–92. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/651043?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Parens, Erik, and Adrienne Asch. 2000. Prenatal Testing and Disability Rights. Vol. Hastings Center studies in ethics. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Park, Shelley M. 2006. ‘Adoptive Maternal Bodies: A Queer Paradigm for Rethinking Mothering?’ Hypatia 21 (1): 201–26. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3811085?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Parry, Sarah. 2003. ‘The Politics of Cloning: Mapping the Rhetorical Convergence of Embryos and Stem Cells in Parliamentary Debates’. New Genetics and Society 22 (2): 177–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463677032000102594.

———. 2006. ‘(Re)Constructing Embryos in Stem Cell Research: Exploring the Meaning of Embryos for People Involved in Fertility Treatments’. Social Science & Medicine 62 (10): 2349–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.10.024.

Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3442629.

‘People’s Health Movement’. n.d. http://www.phmovement.org/en/node/7146.

Perrier, Maud. 2013. ‘No Right Time: The Significance of Reproductive Timing for Younger and Older Mothers’ Moralities’. The Sociological Review 61 (1): 69–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12005.

Petersen, Alan. 2001. ‘Biofantasies: Genetics and Medicine in the Print News Media’. Social Science & Medicine 52 (8): 1255–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00229-X.

Pfeffer, Naomi. 1993. The Stork and the Syringe: A Political History of Reproductive  Medicine. Vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Phillips, Anne. 2011. ‘It’s My Body and I’ll Do What I Like With It: Bodies as Objects and Property’. Political Theory 39 (6): 724–48. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/41502590?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

———. 2013a. Our Bodies, Whose Property? Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685.

———. 2013b. Our Bodies, Whose Property? Electronic resource. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685.

———. 2013c. Our Bodies, Whose Property? Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__SOur%20bodies%2C%20whose%20propertyPw%3D%3D__Ff%3Afacetmediatype%3Ah%3Ah%3AE-Book%3A%3A__Orightresult__U__X0?lang=eng&suite=cobalt.

———. 2013d. Our Bodies, Whose Property? Electronic resource. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://WARW.eblib.com/patron/FullRecord.aspx?p=1131685.

Phoenix, Ann. 1991. Young Mothers? Vol. Family life series. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Piepmeier, Alison. 2013. ‘The Inadequacy of “Choice”: Disability and What’s Wrong with Feminist Framings of Reproduction’. Feminist Studies 39 (1): 159–86. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23719307?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.

Ragone, H. 2000. ‘Of Likeness and Difference: How Race Is Being Transformed by Gestational Surrogacy’. In Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood: Race, Class, Sexuality,  Nationalism, 56–75. New York: Routledge. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/so/so231/ragone_h_2000.pdf.

Ragoné, Helena. 1994. Surrogate Motherhood: Conception in the Heart. Vol. Institutional structures of feeling. Boulder: Westview Press.

Ramey, Sharon Landesman. 2001. Interwoven Lives: Adolescent Mothers and Their Children. Edited by Thomas L. Whitman. Vol. Research monographs in adolescence. Mahwah, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

‘RCOG Statement on Later Maternal Age’. 9AD. https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/news/rcog-statement-on-later-maternal-age/.

Richards, Martin, Guido Pennings, and John B. Appleby. 2012a. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy, and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

———, eds. 2012b. Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9781139026390.

Riggs, Damien W. 2011. ‘"Let’s Go to the Movies”: Filmic Representations of Gay Foster and Adoptive Parents’. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 7 (3): 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2011.564948.

Riggs, Damien W., and Clemence Due. 2014. ‘"The Contented Faces of a Unique Australian Family”: Privilege and Vulnerability in News Media Reporting of Offshore Surrogacy Arrangements’. Feminist Media Studies 14 (5): 869–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2014.952874.

Roberts, Celia, and Karen Throsby. 2008. ‘Paid to Share: IVF Patients, Eggs and Stem Cell Research’. Social Science & Medicine 66 (1): 159–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.08.011.

Roberts, Dorothy E. 1999a. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. 1st Vintage ed. New York: Vintage.

———. 1999b. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. 1st Vintage ed. New York: Vintage.

———. 1999c. Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty. 1st Vintage ed. New York: Vintage.

Roberts, Elizabeth F. S. 2012. God’s Laboratory: Assisted Reproduction in the Andes. Berkeley: University of California Press.

ROCK, PATRICIA J. 1996. ‘Eugenics and Euthanasia: A Cause for Concern for Disabled People, Particularly Disabled Women’. Disability & Society 11 (1): 121–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599650023399.

Rolfe, Alison. 2008. ‘“You’ve Got to Grow up When You’ve Got a Kid”: Marginalized Young Women’s Accounts of Motherhood’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 18 (4): 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.925.

Rosenthal, J.L, R.C Zimmermann, and M.V Sauer. 1997. ‘P-180 The Desire for Childbearing in Women of Advanced Reproductive Age: Findings in a Donor Oocyte Program’. Fertility and Sterility 68 (January): S179–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(97)90995-X.

Rothblatt, Martine Aliana. 1997. Unzipped Genes: Taking Charge of Baby-Making in the New Millennium. Vol. America in transition. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

‘Roundtable: Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Justice’. n.d. Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 34 (3): 102–25. http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/frontiers/v034/34.3.briggs.html.

Rowland, Robyn. 1992. Living Laboratories: Women and Reproductive Technology. London: Lime Tree.

Saetnan, Ann Rudinow, Nelly Oudshoorn, and Marta Stefania Maria Kirejczyk. 2000. Bodies of Technology: Women’s Involvement with Reproductive Medicine. Vol. Women and health : cultural and social perspectives. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press.

Sales, Sally. 2012a. Adoption, Family and the Paradox of Origins: A Foucauldian History. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230363281.

———. 2012b. Adoption, Family and the Paradox of Origins: A Foucauldian History. Electronic resource. Vol. Palgrave Macmillan studies in family and intimate life. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9780230363281.

———. 2015. ‘Contested Attachments: Rethinking Adoptive Kinship in the Era of Open Adoption’. Child & Family Social Work 20 (2): 149–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12062.

Schofield, Gillian. 1994. The Youngest Mothers: The Experience of Pregnancy and Motherhood  among Young Women of School Age. Aldershot: Avebury.

Selman, P, and C Glendinning. 1994. ‘Teenage Pregnancy and Social Policy’. Youth and Policy 47 (5): 39–58.

Selman, Peter and British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering. 2000. Intercountry Adoption: Developments, Trends and Perspectives. London: British Agencies for Adoption and Fostering.

Sevon, Eija. 2005. ‘Timing Motherhood: Experiencing and Narrating the Choice to Become a Mother’. Feminism & Psychology 15 (4): 461–82. http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/0959-353505057619.

Seymour, Nathalie. 2007. In Black and White. London: BAAF.

Shakespeare, Tom. 1999. ‘“Losing the Plot”? Medical and Activist Discourses of Contemporary Genetics and Disability’. Sociology of Health and Illness 21 (5): 669–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.00178.

Shaw, R. 2008. ‘Rethinking Reproductive Gifts as Body Projects’. Sociology 42 (1): 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507084823.

Shaw, Rachel L., and David C. Giles. 2009. ‘Motherhood on Ice? A Media Framing Analysis of Older Mothers in the UK News’. Psychology & Health 24 (2): 221–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440701601625.

Shelton, Nikki, and Sally Johnson. 2006. ‘“I Think Motherhood for Me Was a Bit like a Double-Edged Sword”: The Narratives of Older Mothers’. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology 16 (4): 316–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.867.

Silliman, Jael Miriam, Marlene Gerber Fried, Loretta Ross, and Elena R. Gutiérrez. 2004. Undivided Rights: Women of Color Organize for Reproductive Justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: South End Press.

Silva, Kumarini. 2015. Feminist Erasures: Challenging Backlash Culture. Edited by Kaitlynn Mendes. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillian.

Simon, Rita J., and Howard Altstein. 2002. Adoption, Race, & Identity: From Infancy to Young Adulthood. 2nd ed. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.

Simon, Rita J., Howard Altstein, and Marygold Shire Melli. 1994. The Case for Transracial Adoption. Washington, D.C.: American University Press.

‘SisterSong | Women of Color Reproductive Justice Collective’. n.d. http://sistersong.net/.

Smith, Malcolm K. 2013. ‘The Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008: Restrictions on the Creation of "saviour Siblings” and the Relevance of the Harm Principle’. New Genetics and Society 32 (2): 154–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2013.788358.

Smolin, D.  M. 2006. ‘Child Laundering: How the Intercountry Adoption System Legitimizes and Incentivizes the Practices of Buying, Trafficking, Kidnaping, and Stealing Children’. Wayne Law Review 52 (1): 113–200. https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/waynlr52&id=123&collection=journals.

Spallone, Patricia. 1989. Beyond Conception: The New Politics of Reproduction. Vol. Women in society. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.

Spallone, Patricia, and Deborah Lynn Steinberg. 1987. Made to Order: The Myth of Reproductive and Genetic Progress. Vol. The Athene series. Oxford: Pergamon.

Stacey, Margaret. 1992. Changing Human Reproduction: Social Science Perspectives. London: Sage.

Stanworth, Michelle. 1987a. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.

———. 1987b. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.

———. 1987c. Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. Vol. Feminist perspectives. Cambridge: Polity in association with Blackwell.

Steinberg, Deborah Lynn. 1997a. Bodies in Glass: Genetics, Eugenics, Embryo Ethics. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

———. 1997b. ‘A Most Selective Practice’. Women’s Studies International Forum 20 (1): 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(96)00067-2.

‘Stonewall: Adoption and Fostering’. n.d. https://www.stonewall.org.uk/help-advice/parenting-rights/adoption-and-fostering.

Strong, Kimberly, Ian Kerridge, and Miles Little. 2014. ‘Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children’. Bioethics 28 (4): 187–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8519.2012.02001.x.

‘Successful Parents India | Surrogacy Agency | New Delhi, India’. n.d. http://www.findsurrogatemother.com/surrogacy-agencies/successful-parents-india-new-delhi-india_870.

Sufrin, Carolyn, Alexa Kolbi-Molinas, and Rachel Roth. 2015. ‘Reproductive Justice, Health Disparities And Incarcerated Women in the United States’. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 47 (4): 213–19. https://doi.org/10.1363/47e3115.

Sui, Suli, and Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner. 2010. ‘Choosing Offspring: Prenatal Genetic Testing for Thalassaemia and the Production of a “Saviour Sibling” in China’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 12 (2): 167–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691050902914110.

‘Surrogacy UK’. n.d. http://www.surrogacyuk.org/.

‘Sweden: EWL Members Campaign against Surrogate Motherhood - European Women’s Lobby’. n.d. http://www.womenlobby.org/Sweden-EWL-members-campaign-against-surrogate-motherhood.

Tabberer, Sharon and Joseph Rowntree Foundation. 2000. Teenage Pregnancy and Choice: Abortion or Motherhood : Influences on  the Decision. York: York Publishing Services for the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

Taylor-Sands, Michelle. 2013a. Saviour Siblings: A Relational Approach to the Welfare of the Child in Selective Reproduction. Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, England: Routledge.

———. 2013b. Saviour Siblings: A Relational Approach to the Welfare of the Child in Selective Reproduction. Vol. Biomedical law and ethics library. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, England: Routledge. http://lib.myilibrary.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=542441&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.

‘The Ethics of Stem Cells | Wellcome Trust’. n.d. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Policy/Spotlight-issues/Human-Fertilisation-and-Embryology-Act/Stem-cell-basics/WTD040077.htm.

‘The Pro-Choice Public Education Project’. n.d. http://www.protectchoice.org/index.php.

‘The Tindall Foundation Thrive Teen Parenting Centre’. n.d. http://tindall.org.nz/thrive-teen-parenting-centre-empowering-young-parents-to-build-thriving-families/.

Thompson, Charis. 2005. Making Parents: The Ontological Choreography of Reproductive Technologies. Vol. Inside technology. Cambridge, Mass: MIT.

Throsby, K. 2004. ‘The Unaltered Body?:  Rethinking the Body When IVF Fails’. Science Studies 19 (2): 77–97.

Throsby, K. 2004. ‘“It’s Different for Men”: Masculinity and IVF’. Men and Masculinities 6 (4): 330–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X03260958.

Throsby, Karen. 2004a. When IVF Fails: Feminism, Infertility, and the Negotiation of Normality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2341631.

———. 2004b. When IVF Fails: Feminism, Infertility and the Negotiation of Normality. Electronic resource. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=42678&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth.

Tomasovic, E. 2010. ‘Robbed of Reproductive Justice: The Necessity of a Global Initiative to Provide Redress to Roma Women Coercively Sterilized in Eastern Europe’. Columbia Human Rights Law Review 41 (3): 765–824. https://0-heinonline-org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/colhr41&id=771&collection=journals.

Tornello, Samantha L., and Charlotte J. Patterson. 2015. ‘Timing of Parenthood and Experiences of Gay Fathers: A Life Course Perspective’. Journal of GLBT Family Studies 11 (1): 35–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/1550428X.2013.878681.

Trimmings, Katarina, and P. R. Beaumont, eds. 2013a. International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International Level. Vol. Studies in private international law. Oxford United Kingdom: Hart Publishing. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2749248.

Trimmings, Katarina, and Paul Beaumont. 2013b. International Surrogacy Arrangements: Legal Regulation at the International Level. Electronic resource. Hart Publishing Ltd. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000810.html.

Turney, Jon. 1998. Frankenstein’s Footsteps: Science, Genetics and Popular Culture. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Tutton, Richard. 2002. ‘Gift Relationships in Genetics Research’. Science as Culture 11 (4): 523–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950543022000028965.

Twine, France Winddance. 2015. Outsourcing the Womb: Race, Class, and Gestational Surrogacy in a Global Market. Vol. Framing 21st century social issues. New York, NY: Routledge.

Unnithan, Maya, and Stacy Leigh Pigg. 2014. ‘Sexual and Reproductive Health Rights and Justice – Tracking the Relationship’. Culture, Health & Sexuality 16 (10): 1181–87. https://arlir.iii.com/nonret~S0&atitle=Sexual+and+reproductive+health+rights+and+justice--tracking+the+relationship.&title=Culture,+Health+&+Sexuality&aufirst=&auinit=&aulast=M&issn=14645351&eissn=&coden=&volume=16&issue=10&spage=1181&epage=&quarter=&ssn=&date=2014&sid=&reqtype3.

Vora, Kalindi. 2012. ‘Limits of "Labor”: Accounting for Affect and the Biological in Transnational Surrogacy and Service Work’. South Atlantic Quarterly 111 (4): 681–700. https://doi.org/10.1215/00382876-1724138                                  10.1215/00382876-1724138.

Wade, Peter. 2007a. Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books.

———. 2007b. Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books.

———. 2007c. Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books.

———. 2007d. Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. Vol. Studies of the biosocial society. New York: Berghahn Books.

Waldby, C, and M Cooper. n.d. ‘From Reproductive Work to Regenerative Labour: The Female Body and the Stem Cell Industries’’. Feminist Theory 11 (1): 3–22.

Waldby, Catherine. 2008. ‘Oocyte Markets: Women’s Reproductive Work in Embryonic Stem Cell Research’. New Genetics and Society 27 (1): 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636770701843576.

Weed, Keri, Jody S. Nicholson, and Jaelyn Renee Farris. 2015. Teen Pregnancy and Parenting: Rethinking the Myths and Misperceptions. Electronic resource. Vol. Routledge advances in health and social policy. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. http://0-www.tandfebooks.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/isbn/9780203079607.

Weise, Jacqueline. 1988. Transracial Adoption: A Black Perspective. Vol. Social work monograph. Norwich: Social Work Monographs.

Williams, Clare, Jenny Kitzinger, and Lesley Henderson. 2003. ‘Envisaging the Embryo in Stem Cell Research: Rhetorical Strategies and Media Reporting of the Ethical Debates’. Sociology of Health and Illness 25 (7): 793–814. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1467-9566.2003.00370.x.

Wilson, Angelia R. 2013. Situating Intersectionality: Politics, Policy, and Power. Vol. The politics of intersectionality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. http://0-www.palgraveconnect.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doifinder/10.1057/9781137025135.

WILSON, HELEN, and ANNETTE HUNTINGTON. 2005. ‘Deviant (M)Others: The Construction of Teenage Motherhood in Contemporary Discourse’. Journal of Social Policy 35 (01). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279405009335.

Winkelman, William D., Stacey A. Missmer, Dale Myers, and Elizabeth S. Ginsburg. 2015. ‘Public Perspectives on the Use of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis’. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 32 (5): 665–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0456-8.

Yamin, Alicia Ely, and Vanessa M Boulanger. 2013. ‘Embedding Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in a Transformational Development Framework: Lessons Learned from the MDG Targets and Indicators’. Reproductive Health Matters 21 (42): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-8080(13)42727-1.

Yamin, Alicia Ely, and Vanessa M. Boulanger. 2014. ‘Why Global Goals and Indicators Matter: The Experience of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights in the Millennium Development Goals’. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 15 (2–3): 218–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2014.896322.

Yngvesson, Barbara. 2010. Belonging in an Adopted World: Race, Identity, and Transnational Adoption. Vol. The Chicago series in law and society. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3099465.

Younes, Maha N., and Stephanie A. Klein. 2014. ‘The International Adoption Experience: Do They Live Happily Ever After?’ Adoption Quarterly 17 (1): 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2014.875090.

Zucker, Alyssa N. 2014. ‘Reproductive Justice: More Than Choice’. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy 14 (1): 210–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12059.

Zyl, Liezl van, and Anton van Niekerk. 2000. ‘Interpretations, Perspectives and Intentions in Surrogate Motherhood’. Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (5): 404–9. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/27718578?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.