[1]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
[2]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9780226300610
[3]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002.
[4]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277859&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[5]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
[6]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780226300610
[7]
T. S. Kuhn, ‘The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions’, in The structure of scientific revolutions, Fourth edition., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012, pp. 92–110 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7b5645f5-a743-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[8]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002.
[9]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277859&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[10]
L. Laudan, ‘Demystifying Underdetermination’, in Philosophy of science: the central issues, 1st ed., New York: W.W. Norton, 1998, pp. 320–353 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c3067e34-a943-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[11]
Lipton, Peter, Inference to the best explanation, 2nd ed., vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group, 2004.
[12]
Popper, Karl R., The logic of scientific discovery, vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=23930&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[13]
K. Popper, ‘The Problem of Induction’, in The logic of scientific discovery, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 3–10 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9b483484-c143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[14]
K. Popper, ‘Conjectures and Refutations’, in Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge, vol. Routledge classics, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 43–51 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=14e00f7e-c143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[15]
W. V. Quine, ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, in From a logical point of view: 9 logico-philosophical essays, 2d ed., Rev., Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1963, pp. 20–46 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c800855f-c343-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[16]
Lipton, Peter, Inference to the best explanation, 2nd ed., vol. International library of philosophy. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group, 2004.
[17]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
[18]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780226300610
[19]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002.
[20]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277859&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[21]
Goodman, Nelson, Fact, fiction, and forecast, 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
[22]
J. Vickers, ‘The Problem of Induction (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/
[23]
K. Popper, ‘Conjectures and Refutations’, in Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge, vol. Routledge classics, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 43–51 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=14e00f7e-c143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[24]
K. Popper, ‘The Problem of Induction’, in The logic of scientific discovery, London: Routledge, 2002, pp. 3–10 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9b483484-c143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[25]
Popper, Karl R., The logic of scientific discovery, vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=23930&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[26]
Newton-Smith, W., The rationality of science, vol. International library of philosophy. Boston, Mass: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
[27]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002.
[28]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277859&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[29]
P. Godfrey-Smith, ‘Popper’s Philosophy of Science: Looking Ahead’, 2007 [Online]. Available: http://petergodfreysmith.com/science-me
[30]
S. O. Hansson, ‘Science and Pseudo-Science (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/
[31]
I. Lakatos, ‘Science and Pseudoscience’, 1973 [Online]. Available: http://www.lse.ac.uk/philosophy/About/lakatos/scienceandpseudoscience.aspx
[32]
Paul R. Thagard, ‘Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience’, PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 1978, pp. 223–234, 1978 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/192639
[33]
Gerald Holton, ‘Science, Technology, & Human Values’, vol. 7, no. 40 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/i227969
[34]
T. S. Kuhn, ‘The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions’, in The structure of scientific revolutions, Fourth edition., Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2012, pp. 92–110 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7b5645f5-a743-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[35]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003.
[36]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter, Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science, vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780226300610
[37]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002.
[38]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277859&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[39]
Newton-Smith, W., The rationality of science, vol. International library of philosophy. Boston, Mass: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1981.
[40]
T. Nickles, ‘Scientific Revolutions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-revolutions/
[41]
E. Oberheim and P. Hoyningen-Huene, ‘The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incommensurability/
[42]
J. Worrall, ‘Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds’, Dialectica, vol. 43, no. 1/2, pp. 99–124, 1989 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/42970613
[43]
Jackson, Frank and Smith, Michael, The Oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy, vol. Oxford handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
[44]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002.
[45]
Ladyman, James, Understanding philosophy of science. London: Routledge, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277859&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[46]
Bird, Alexander, Philosophy of science, vol. Fundamentals of philosophy. London: UCL Press, 1998.
[47]
K. Stanford, ‘Underdetermination of Scientific Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/
[48]
R. Boyd, ‘Scientific Realism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/
[49]
J. Ladyman, ‘Structural Realism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. [Online]. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/
[50]
Van Fraassen, Bas C., The scientific image, vol. Clarendon library of logic and philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon, 1980 [Online]. Available: http://0-www.oxfordscholarship.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/view/10.1093/0198244274.001.0001/acprof-9780198244271-chapter-2
[51]
L. Laudan, ‘Demystifying Underdetermination’, in Philosophy of science: the central issues, 1st ed., New York: W.W. Norton, 1998, pp. 320–353 [Online]. Available: https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c3067e34-a943-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
[52]
H. Feigl and G. Maxwell, Scientific explanation, space, and time, vol. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 1962.
[53]
Eddington, Arthur Stanley, The nature of the physical world, vol. Everyman’s library. London: J.M. Dent & Sons, 1935.
