[1]
Bird, Alexander 1998. Philosophy of science. UCL Press.
[2]
Eddington, Arthur Stanley 1935. The nature of the physical world. J.M. Dent & Sons.
[3]
Feigl, H. and Maxwell, G. 1962. Scientific explanation, space, and time. Univ. of Minnesota Press.
[4]
Gerald Holton Science, Technology, & Human Values. 7, 40.
[5]
Godfrey-Smith, P. 2007. Popper’s Philosophy of Science: Looking Ahead. (2007).
[6]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[7]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[8]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[9]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[10]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[11]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[12]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[13]
Godfrey-Smith, Peter 2003. Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press.
[14]
Goodman, Nelson Fact, fiction, and forecast. Bobbs-Merrill.
[15]
Jackson, Frank and Smith, Michael 2005. The Oxford handbook of contemporary philosophy. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Kuhn, T.S. 2012. The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions. The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. 92–110.
[17]
Kuhn, T.S. 2012. The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions. The structure of scientific revolutions. The University of Chicago Press. 92–110.
[18]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[19]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[20]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[21]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[22]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[23]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[24]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[25]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[26]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[27]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[28]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[29]
Ladyman, James 2002. Understanding philosophy of science. Routledge.
[30]
Lakatos, I. 1973. Science and Pseudoscience. (1973).
[31]
Laudan, L. 1998. Demystifying Underdetermination. Philosophy of science: the central issues. W.W. Norton. 320–353.
[32]
Laudan, L. 1998. Demystifying Underdetermination. Philosophy of science: the central issues. W.W. Norton. 320–353.
[33]
Lipton, Peter 2004. Inference to the best explanation. Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
[34]
Lipton, Peter 2004. Inference to the best explanation. Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
[35]
Newton-Smith, W. 1981. The rationality of science. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[36]
Newton-Smith, W. 1981. The rationality of science. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
[37]
Paul R. Thagard 1978. Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association. 1978, (1978), 223–234.
[38]
Popper, K. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge. 43–51.
[39]
Popper, K. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge. 43–51.
[40]
Popper, K. 2002. The Problem of Induction. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. 3–10.
[41]
Popper, K. 2002. The Problem of Induction. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge. 3–10.
[42]
Popper, Karl R. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
[43]
Popper, Karl R. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. Routledge.
[44]
Quine, W.V. 1963. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. From a logical point of view: 9 logico-philosophical essays. Harvard University Press. 20–46.
[45]
Science and Pseudo-Science (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/.
[46]
Scientific Realism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/.
[47]
Scientific Revolutions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-revolutions/.
[48]
Structural Realism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/.
[49]
The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incommensurability/.
[50]
The Problem of Induction (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/.
[51]
Underdetermination of Scientific Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy): http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/.
[52]
Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The scientific image. Clarendon.
[53]
Worrall, J. 1989. Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds. Dialectica. 43, 1/2 (1989), 99–124.