Bibliography for PH123: Elements of Scientific Method BETA

Bird, Alexander. 1998. Philosophy of Science. Vol. Fundamentals of philosophy. London: UCL Press.

Boyd, Richard. n.d. ‘Scientific Realism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/).

Eddington, Arthur Stanley. 1935. The Nature of the Physical World. Vol. Everyman’s library. London: J.M. Dent & Sons.

Feigl, Herbert, and Grover Maxwell. 1962. Scientific Explanation, Space, and Time. Vol. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.

Gerald Holton. n.d. ‘Science, Technology, & Human Values’. 7(40).

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003a. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003b. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003c. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003d. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003e. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003f. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003g. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2003h. Theory and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science. Vol. Science and its conceptual foundations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Godfrey-Smith, Peter. 2007. ‘Popper’s Philosophy of Science: Looking Ahead’.

Goodman, Nelson. n.d. Fact, Fiction, and Forecast. 3rd ed. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Hansson, Sven Ove. n.d. ‘Science and Pseudo-Science (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pseudo-science/).

Jackson, Frank and Smith, Michael. 2005. The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Vol. Oxford handbooks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kuhn, T. S. 2012a. ‘The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions’. Pp. 92–110 in The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S. 2012b. ‘The Nature and Necessity of Scientific Revolutions’. Pp. 92–110 in The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Ladyman, James. 2002a. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002b. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002c. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002d. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002e. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002f. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002g. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002h. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002i. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002j. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002k. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. 2002l. Understanding Philosophy of Science. London: Routledge.

Ladyman, James. n.d. ‘Structural Realism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/).

Lakatos, Imre. 1973. ‘Science and Pseudoscience’.

Laudan, L. 1998. ‘Demystifying Underdetermination’. Pp. 320–53 in Philosophy of science: the central issues. New York: W.W. Norton.

Laudan, Larry. 1998. ‘Demystifying Underdetermination’. Pp. 320–53 in Philosophy of science: the central issues. New York: W.W. Norton.

Lipton, Peter. 2004a. Inference to the Best Explanation. Vol. International library of philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

Lipton, Peter. 2004b. Inference to the Best Explanation. Vol. International library of philosophy. 2nd ed. London: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.

Newton-Smith, W. 1981a. The Rationality of Science. Vol. International library of philosophy. Boston, Mass: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Newton-Smith, W. 1981b. The Rationality of Science. Vol. International library of philosophy. Boston, Mass: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Nickles, Thomas. n.d. ‘Scientific Revolutions (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-revolutions/).

Oberheim, Eric, and Paul Hoyningen-Huene. n.d. ‘The Incommensurability of Scientific Theories (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/incommensurability/).

Paul R. Thagard. 1978. ‘Why Astrology Is a Pseudoscience’. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:223–34.

Popper, K. 2002a. ‘Conjectures and Refutations’. Pp. 43–51 in Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge.

Popper, K. 2002b. ‘Conjectures and Refutations’. Pp. 43–51 in Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge.

Popper, K. 2002c. ‘The Problem of Induction’. Pp. 3–10 in The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

Popper, K. 2002d. ‘The Problem of Induction’. Pp. 3–10 in The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

Popper, Karl R. 2002a. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge.

Popper, Karl R. 2002b. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Vol. Routledge classics. London: Routledge.

Quine, W. V. 1963. ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’. Pp. 20–46 in From a logical point of view: 9 logico-philosophical essays. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Stanford, Kyle. n.d. ‘Underdetermination of Scientific Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-underdetermination/).

Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1980. The Scientific Image. Vol. Clarendon library of logic and philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon.

Vickers, John. n.d. ‘The Problem of Induction (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’. Retrieved (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/induction-problem/).

Worrall, John. 1989. ‘Structural Realism: The Best of Both Worlds’. Dialectica 43(1/2):99–124.