A New Magna Carta. (2014). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmpolcon/463/463.pdf
Allan, T. R. S. (1994). Law, liberty, and justice: the legal foundations of British constitutionalism. Clarendon Press.
Allan, T. R. S. (1997). Parliamentary sovereignty: law, politics, and revolution. Law Quarterly Review, 113(Jul), 443–452. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F70AB0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Allan, T. R. S. (2005). Constitutional justice: a liberal theory of the rule of law [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001
Allan, T. R. S. (2006). Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”. The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), 671–695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007264
Allan, T. R. S. (2011a). Judicial deference and judicial review: legal doctrine and legal theory. Law Quarterly Review, 127(Jan), 96–117. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I20DA9E6008C611E0A451F66F817AC0EE
Allan, T. R. S. (2011b). Questions of legality and legitimacy: Form and substance in British constitutionalism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor017
Allan, T. R. S. (2013). The sovereignty of law: freedom, constitution and common law. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199685066.001.0001
Aroney, N. (2014). Reserved matters, legislative purpose and the referendum on Scottish independence. Public Law, Jul, 422–445. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A24C20F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A
Ballinger, C. (2012). The House of Lords, 1911-2011: a century of non-reform: Vol. Hart studies in constitutional law. Hart.
Bamforth, N., & Leyland, P. (Eds.). (2014). Accountability in the contemporary constitution. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199670024.001.0001
Barber, N. W. (2001). Prelude to the Separation of Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal, 60(1), 59–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197301000629
Barber, N. W. (2011). The afterlife of Parliamentary sovereignty. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor023
Barendt, E. (1995). Separation of powers and constitutional government. Public Law, Win, 599–619. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID3936440E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
Beaton, R. (2014). The Boundaries of Proportionality Review and the End of Life. Judicial Review, 19(3), 135–139. https://doi.org/10.5235/10854681.19.3.135
Bellinger (FC) (Appellant) v. Bellinger [2003] UKHL 21. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200203/ldjudgmt/jd030410/bellin-1.htm
Bingham, T. H. (2010). The rule of law. Allen Lane.
Bjorge, E. (2015). Fundamental rights at English (and European?) common law. Law Quarterly Review, 131(Apr), 192–196. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9010B212C81111E4A0E9E7C45C1190E1
Blick, A. (2011). Codifying – or not codifying – the UK constitution: A Literature Review. Centre for Political and Constitutional Studies King’s College London. http://www.parliament.uk/pagefiles/56954/CPCS%20Literature%20Review%20(4).pdf
Bogdanor, V. (2009). The new British Constitution. Hart Pub.
Bogdanor, V. & British Academy. (2003). The British constitution in the twentieth century. Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
Bradley, A. W. (2010). The Courts and the Machinery of Justice. In Constitutional and administrative law (15th ed, pp. 362–394). Pearson Longman. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=238b8e66-8543-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Bradley, A. W., Ewing, K. D., & Knight, C. (2014). Constitutional and administrative law (Sixteenth edition). Pearson. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2741966
Brady, A. D. P. (2012). Proportionality and deference under the UK Human Rights Act: an institutionally sensitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/
Cambridge University Law Society, University of Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, & William S. Hein & Company. (1921). The Cambridge law journal [Electronic resource]. http://0-journals.cambridge.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/jid_Clj
Campbell, D., & Young, J. (2002). The metric martyrs and the entrenchment jurisprudence of Lord Justice Laws. Public Law, Aut, 399–406. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I79F6E3A1E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Campbell, T., Ewing, K. D., & Tomkins, A. (2001). Sceptical essays on human rights. Oxford University Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2662633
Clayton, R. (2004). Judicial deference and ‘democratic dialogue’: the legitimacy of judicial intervention under the Human Rights Act 1998. Public Law, Spr, 33–47. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84927EF0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Clayton, R. (2015). The empire strikes back: common law rights and the Human Rights Act. Public Law, Jan, 3–12. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I28D78E607B4611E4A15DE99780331015
Coservatives on Bill of Rights. (n.d.). https://www.conservatives.com/~/media/files/downloadable%20Files/human_rights.pdf
Craig, P. (2007). Britain in the European Union. In The Changing Constitution (pp. 84–107). https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fe132c05-8b43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Craig, P. (2014). Constitutionalising constitutional law: HS2. Public Law, Jul, 373–392. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID5A13AB0F30B11E385A2E4EF39C65A9A
Craig, P. P. (1997). Formal and substantive conceptions of the rule of law: an analytical framework. Public Law, 467–487. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID15274F0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
Craig, P. P. (2012). Administrative law (7th ed). Sweet & Maxwell.
Craig, Paul. (n.d.). The European Union Act 2011: Locks, limits and legality. Common Market Law Review, 48(6), 1915–1944. http://0-www.kluwerlawonline.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/abstract.php?area=Journals&id=COLA2011074
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. (n.d.). Prospect: politics, essay, review [Electronic resource]. http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB
Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. (1994). The spectator [Electronic resource]. http://0-global.factiva.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/en/sess/login.asp?XSID=S003sFo3sb90pFyMT7yMTEnNDUoOTUvMtmm5DFHY96oYqZlNFFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFBQUFB
Draghici, C. (2015). The blanket ban on assisted suicide: between moral paternalism and utilitarian justice. European Human Rights Law Review, 3, 286–297. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I293F05E026F411E58A24809D3D7EB82F
Dyke, T. (2011). Judicial review in an age of austerity. Judicial Review, 3(16), 202–215. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cf77d1d2-8e43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Edwards, R. A. (2002). Judicial Deference under the Human Rights Act. Modern Law Review, 65(6), 859–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00413
Elliott, M. (2013). A damp squib in the long grass: the report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 137–151. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I4BCCF680A3E811E2A94CA75C16A20EA4
Elliott, M. (2014). Constitutional Legislation, European Union Law and the Nature of the United Kingdom’s Contemporary Constitution. European Constitutional Law Review, 10(3), 379–392. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/docview/1648045830?accountid=14888
Elliott, M. (2015). The Proposed Scotland Bill: The Constitutional Implications of Draft Clauses 1 and 2. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557451
Elliott, M., & Thomas, R. (2017). Public law (Third edition). Oxford University Press.
Entick v Carrington & Ors [1765] EWHC KB J98 (02 November 1765). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/1765/J98.html
European Communities Act 1972. (n.d.). Statute Law Database. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1972/68/contents
Ewing, K. D. (2004). The futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law, Win, 829–852. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A8ED21E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Ewing, K. D., & Tham, J.-C. (2008). The continuing futility of the Human Rights Act. Public Law, Win, 668–693. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EAB8B099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26
Finnis, J. (2015). A British ‘Convention right’ to assistance in suicide? Law Quarterly Review, 131, 1–8. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I34BAA2907BAE11E49BBC911AA7DF78F5
Flinders, M. (2000). The enduring centrality of individual ministerial responsibility within the British constitution. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 6(3), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13572330008420632
Foster, S. (2015). Repealing the Human Rights Act 1998. Criminal Law & Justice Weekly, 179(46). http://0-www.lexisnexis.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/uk/legal/docview/getDocForCuiReq?lni=5HK8-1J01-DYJF-G17K&csi=280390&oc=00240&perma=true&elb=t
Gearty, C. (2015). On fantasy island: British politics, English judges and the European Convention on Human Rights. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 1–8. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD6D8CD0ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E
Gearty, C. A. (2013). Liberty and security. Polity.
Gee, G., & Webber, G. C. N. (2010). What Is a Political Constitution? Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), 273–299. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013
Ghaidan (Appellant) v. Godin-Mendoza (FC) (Respondent) [2004] UKHL 30. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200304/ldjudgmt/jd040621/gha-1.htm
Goldsworthy, J. D. (2001). The sovereignty of Parliament: history and philosophy [Electronic resource]. Clarendon. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199248087.001.0001
Goldsworthy, J. D. (2010). Parliamentary sovereignty: contemporary debates: Vol. Cambridge studies in constitutional law [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=277078&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Gordon, M. (2009). The conceptual foundations of parliamentary sovereignty: reconsidering Jennings and Wade. Public Law, Jul, 519–543. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3E10D5B1727E11DE8047B748D67C18CA
Gordon, M., & Dougan, M. (2012). The United Kingdom’s European Union Act 2011: ‘who won the bloody war anyway?’ European Law Review, 37(1), 3–30. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID13B043050A411E18A8AA01CC7CE21D9
Gyorfi, T. (2013). Between Common Law Constitutionalism and Procedural Democracy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 33(2), 317–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqt004
Harlow, C., & Rawlings, R. (2009). Law and administration: Vol. Law in context (3rd ed) [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=238868&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Heydon, J. D. (2014). Are bills of rights necessary in common law systems? Law Quarterly Review, 130(Jul), 392–412. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7CAEEF40F31C11E3847EA720781C7CD8
Hickman, T., & Craig, P. P. (2010). Public law after the Human Rights Act. Hart Pub. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2544638
Himsworth, C. M. G. (2007). Devolution and its Jurisdictional Asymmetries. Modern Law Review, 70(1), 31–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2006.00625.x
Horne, A., & Drewry, G. (Eds.). (2018). Parliament and the law: Vol. volume 8 (Second edition). Hart Publishing.
House of Commons - The EU Bill and Parliamentary Sovereignty - European Scrutiny Committee. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/633/63302.htm
House of Commons - The EU Bill: Restrictions on Treaties and Decisions relating to the EU - European Scrutiny Committee. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201011/cmselect/cmeuleg/682/68202.htm
HS2 Alliance Case. (n.d.). https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/UKSC_2013_0172_Judgment.pdf
Human Rights Act Reform | UK Constitutional Law Association. (n.d.). http://ukconstitutionallaw.org/tag/human-rights-act-reform/
Jackson and others (Appellants) v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General. [2005] UKHL 56. (n.d.). http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd051013/jack.pdf
Johnson, Nevil. (2004). Reshaping the British constitution: essays in political interpretation. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jones, T. H. (2012). Wales, Devolution and Sovereignty. Statute Law Review, 33(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/slr/hms023
Jones, T. H., & Williams, J. M. (2004). Wales as a jurisdiction. Public Law, Spr, 78–101. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I847E33A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Jowell, J. (2003). Judicial deference: servility, civility or institutional capacity? Public Law, 592–601. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8487F7A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Jowell, J. (2006). Parliamentary sovereignty under the new constitutional hypothesis. Public Law, Aut, 562–580. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF0D05E100D4A11DB9253D431BB978268
Jowell, J. L., Oliver, D., & O’Cinneide, C. (2015). The changing constitution (Eighth edition). Oxford University Press.
JSTOR (Organization) & William S. Hein & Company. (1937). The modern law review [Electronic resource]. http://0-onlinelibrary.wiley.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1468-2230
Kavanagh, A. (2006). The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26(1), 179–206. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqi049
Kavanagh, A. (2009a). Constitutional review under the UK Human Rights Act [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780511724374
Kavanagh, A. (2009b). Judging the judges under the Human Rights Act: deference, disillusionment and the ‘war on terror’. Public Law, Apr, 287–304. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IFC2512E1231F11DEBA18CA797BE6038F
Kavanagh, A. (2010). Defending deference in public law and constitutional theory. Law Quarterly Review, 126(Apr), 222–250. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069
King, A. (2009). The British constitution [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199576982.001.0001
Klug, F. (2003). Judicial deference under the Human Rights Act 1998. European Human Rights Law Review, 2, 125–133. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A25D70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Klug, F., & Williams, A. (2013). The choice before us? The report of the Commission on a Bill of Rights. Public Law, Jul, 459–468. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I00EDF7D0D7C911E29A79B66BE8E69D4B
Laws, J. (1995). Law and democracy. Public Law, Spr, 72–93. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID390A520E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
Lee, R. G. (2010). Blackstone’s statutes on public law and human rights 2010-2011: Vol. Blackstone’s statutes series. Oxford University Press.
Legislation.gov.uk. (n.d.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga
Lester, A. (2005). The utility of the Human rights Act: a reply to Keith Ewing. Public Law, Sum, 249–258. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I84A43231E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Leyland, P. (2012). The constitution of the United Kingdom: a contextual analysis: Vol. Constitutional systems of the world (2nd ed). Hart Publishing.
Leyland, P., & Anthony, G. (2013). Textbook on administrative law (7th ed). Oxford University Press.
Loughlin, M. (2013). The British constitution: a very short introduction: Vol. Very Short Introductions (First edition). Oxford University Press.
M v Home Office [1993] UKHL 5 (27 July 1993). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1993/5.html
MacCormick, N. (1993). Beyond the Sovereign State. The Modern Law Review, 56(1), 1–18. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/1096572
Masterman, R., & Wheatle, S. (2015). A Common law Resurgence in Rights Protection. European Human Rights Law Review, 1, 57–65. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IAD718470ADF811E4A8D6F1E3CD2AEA2E
McEldowney, J. (2002). Parliament. In Public law: Vol. Sweet&Maxwell’s textbook series (3rd ed, pp. 59–94). Sweet & Maxwell. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dc70e3c1-b143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
McKeever, D. (2010). The Human Rights Act and anti-terrorism in the UK: one great leap forward by Parliament, but are the courts able to slow the steady retreat that has followed? Public Law, Jan, 110–139. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I67F11560E15B11DE88C6C8FBE711743E
McLean, I., & McMillan, A. (2005). State of the union: Unionism and the alternatives in the United Kingdom since 1707 [Electronic resource]. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0199258201.001.0001
McLean, I., & Peterson, S. (2014). Transitional constitutionalism in the United Kingdom. Cambridge Journal of International and Comparative Law, 3(4), 1113–1135. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I6587228063DF11E58BD8DD30ADE7CC2B
Melton, J., Stuart, C., & Helen, D. (n.d.). To Codify or not to Codify? The Constitution Unit. https://www.ucl.ac.uk/constitution-unit/publications/tabs/unit-publications/162.pdf
MoJ. (n.d.). Commission on a Bill of Rights: The Choice Before Us. IMB. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130206065653/https://www.justice.gov.uk/downloads/about/cbr/uk-bill-rights-vol-1.pdf
Mullock, A. (2015). The Supreme Court decision in Nicklinson: human rights, criminal wrongs and the dilemma of death. Professional Negligence, 31(1), 18–28. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I9DF4F830B51711E49F8488D430410EF0
Murkens, J. E. K. (2009). The Quest for Constitutionalism in UK Public Law Discourse. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 29(3), 427–455. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqp020
New statesman. (1996). [Electronic resource]. http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1
Obergefell v. Hodges No. 14–556. (2014). Supreme Court of the United States. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-556_3204.pdf
Oliver, D. (2003). Constitutional reform in the UK. Oxford University Press.
Oxford journal of legal studies. (n.d.). http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1743939
Parliamentary Research Paper 04/31. (n.d.). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/RP04-31
Partington, M. (2006). Law and Society: The purposes and functions of Law. In An Introduction to the English Legal System (pp. 13–30). https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d59df230-bd43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Peers, S. (2013). European integration and the European Union Act 2011: an irresistible force meets an immovable object? Public Law, Jan, 119–134. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=IBA050BB03F0711E2990CBEA3BDA0BE6D
Poole, T. (2003). Back to the Future? Unearthing the Theory of Common Law Constitutionalism. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(3), 435–454. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.3.435
Public law. (n.d.).
Public law. (1956). http://login.westlaw.co.uk/wluk/app/external/path?ao=o.I66580770A29A11DB9A2D866D614A63ED&ndd=2&athens=true
R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent), R (on the application of AM) (AP) (Respondent) v The Director of Public Prosecutions (Appellant) [2014] UKSC 38. (n.d.). https://www.supremecourt.uk/decided-cases/docs/uksc_2013_0235_judgment.pdf
R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p Factortame Ltd (Interim Relief Order) [1990] UKHL 7 (26 July 1990). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1990/7.html
Rawlings, R., Leyland, P., & Young, A. L. (Eds.). (2014). Sovereignty and the law: domestic, European and international perspectives. Oxford University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199684069.001.0001
Research Briefings - Individual ministerial accountability (2012). (n.d.). http://researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ResearchBriefing/Summary/SN06467
Russell, M. (2013). The contemporary House of Lords: Westminster bicameralism revived. Oxford University Press.
Sales, P., & Ekins, R. (2011). Rights-consistent interpretation and the Human Rights Act 1998. Law Quarterly Review, 127(Apr), 217–238. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I7DFA62304E5611E0B91FA9F94CE59879
Sedley, S. (1995). Human rights: a twenty-first century agenda. Public Law, Aut, 386–400. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38FBAC0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
Society of Public Teachers of Law (London, England). (n.d.). Legal studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars.
Stephenson, S. (2015). The Supreme Court’s renewed interest in Autochthonous Constitutionalism. Public Law. https://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/document?&srguid=i0ad6ada60000016436a303cb1194d14a&docguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&hitguid=I4508F36010F311E5B853A6F356F47180&rank=1&spos=1&epos=1&td=1&crumb-action=append&context=2&resolvein=true
Taylor, R. B. (2015). Foundational and regulatory conventions: exploring the constitutional significance of Britain’s dependency upon conventions. Public Law, 614–632. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD
The Cambridge law journal. (n.d.). http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1737980
The economist. (n.d.). [Electronic resource]. http://0-search.proquest.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/publication/41716
The guardian. (1980). [Electronic resource]. http://0-www.bpe.europresse.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/ip/intro.asp?user=WARWICKT_1
The Law quarterly review. (n.d.). http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb1742833
The Modern law review. (n.d.).
Thoburn v Sunderland City Council [2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) (18 February 2002). (n.d.). http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Admin/2002/195.html
Tomkins, A. (2010). National security and the role of the court: a changed landscape? Law Quarterly Review, 126(Oct), 543–567. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I0756BA21C2CE11DFA880E34515B10C27
Tomkins, Adam. (2003). Public law: Vol. Clarendon law series. Oxford University Press.
Turpin, C., & Tomkins, A. (2007). The Ideas of the Constitution [Electronic resource]. In British government and the constitution: text and materials (6th ed, pp. 33–137). Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=cd674a39-dc43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb
Turpin, C., & Tomkins, A. (2012). British government and the constitution: text and materials: Vol. Law in context series (7th ed) [Electronic resource]. Cambridge University Press. http://lib.myilibrary.com/browse/open.asp?id=329861&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
Wade, H. W. R. . (1991). What has happened to the sovereignty of Parliament? Law Quarterly Review, 107(Jan), 1–4. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ICD256D10E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
Walter, J., Finey, W., Walter, W., Walter, J., Robinson, H. C., Stoddart, J., Barnes, T., Delane, J. T., Chenery, T., Buckle, G. E., Dawson, G., Casey, W. F., & Dow Jones Reuters Business Interactive LLC. (1788). The times. http://0-infotrac.galegroup.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/itweb/warwick?db=TTDA
Wells, C. E. (2015). Obergefell v Hodges. European Human Rights Law Review, 4, 406–412. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I88B2E3B0411211E59CB8B97FD04D5F6C
White, R. (2011). Separation of powers and legislative supremacy. Law Quarterly Review, 127(Jul), 456–474. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I3C19CA009A2711E09D29F4D8A5F97F11
Wicks, E. (2006). The evolution of a constitution: eight key moments in British constitutional history. Hart Pub.
Wicks, E. (2015). The Supreme Court Judgment in Nicklinson: One Step Forward on Assisted Dying; Two Steps Back on Human Rights: A Commentary on The Supreme Court Judgment in R (Nicklinson) V Ministry Of Justice; R (AM) V Director Of Public Prosecutions [2014] UKSC 38. Medical Law Review, 23(1), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwu031
William S. Hein & Company. (1885). The law quarterly review. http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Index?index=journals/lqr&collection=journals
Woolf, Lord. (1995). Droit public - English style. Public Law, Spr, 57–71. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID38EF770E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028
Young, A. L. (2005). Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza: avoiding the deference trap. Public Law, Spr, 23–34. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=I8499AAE0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A
Young, A. L. (2009a). In Defence of Due Deference. Modern Law Review, 72(4), 554–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00757.x
Young, A. L. (2009b). Parliamentary sovereignty and the Human Rights Act [Electronic resource]. Hart Publishing. http://0-portal.igpublish.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iglibrary/search/HARTB0000473.html
Young, A. L. (2011a). Is dialogue working under the Human Rights Act 1998? Public Law, 773–800. http://login.westlaw.co.uk/maf/wluk/app/authentication/sso/athens?redirect=/maf/wluk/app/document?docguid=ID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576
Young, A. L. (2011b). Sovereignty: Demise, afterlife, or partial resurrection? International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor028
Young, A. L. (2012). Rule of Law in the United Kingdom: Formal or Substantive, The. Vienna Online Journal on International Constitutional Law 6 (Law Journal Library), 6(1995–5855). http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/vioincl6&g_sent=1&collection=journals&id=259
