Allan, S. 1996. ‘Prinz Friedrich von Homburg’. In The Plays of Heinrich von Kleist: Ideals and Illusions, Cambridge studies in German:223–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=eec0e7f6-8143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Allan, Seâan. 1996. The Plays of Heinrich von Kleist: Ideals and Illusions. Vol. Cambridge studies in German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511519406.
Allen, R. 1996. ‘Reading Kleist and Hoffmann’. In Romantic Writings, Approaching literature:251–67. London: Routledge in association with the Open University. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=c0e27cfd-8143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Bahr, Ehrhard. 1974. Was Ist Aufklärung?: Thesen Und Definitionen. Vol. Reclams Universal-Bibliothek. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Benn, M B. 1976. ‘Political Revolt’. In The Drama of Revolt: A Critical Study of Georg Büchner, Anglica Germanica. Series 2:4–40. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=24fe71a9-8343-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Berlin, Isaiah and Hardy, Henry. 2000. The Roots of Romanticism: The A.W. Mellon Lectures in the Fine Arts, 1965, the National Gallery of Art, Washington, DC. London: Pimlico.
Bèuchner, Georg and Greiner, Martin. 1957. Lenz: Der Hessische Landbote. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Beutin, Wolfgang. 1993. A History of German Literature: From the Beginnings to the Present  Day. 4th ed. London: Routledge. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/search/C__S%20history%20of%20German%20literature%20%20beutin__Orightresult__U?lang=eng&suite=cobalt&fromMain=yes.
Blackbourn, David, and David Blackbourn. 2003. History of Germany, 1780-1918: The Long Nineteenth Century. 2nd ed. Vol. Blackwell classic histories of Europe. Malden, Mass., Oxford: Blackwell Pub.
Brown, H M. 1998. ‘Die Verlobung in St Domingo/ The Erzahlungen’. In Heinrich von Kleist: The Ambiguity of Art and the Necessity of Form, 179–94. Oxford: Clarendon. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=86764f2b-8643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Brown, H. M. 1998. Heinrich von Kleist: The Ambiguity of Art and the Necessity of Form. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Brunschwig, Henri and Jellinek, Frank. 1974. Enlightenment and Romanticism in Eighteenth-Century Prussia. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bunyan, A. 2003. ‘Heine, Die Harzreise’. In Landmarks in German Short Prose, Britische und irische Studien zur deutschen Sprache und Literatur:61–78. Oxford: P. Lang. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=decc6ac4-8643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Durrell, Martin, and A. E. Hammer. 2017. Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage. Sixth edition. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
Dyer, D. 1977. ‘Das Erdbeben in Chili’. In The Stories of Kleist: A Critical Study, 13–30. London: Duckworth. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=723471a9-8e43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Ellis, J. M. 1963. ‘Kleist’s Das Erdbeben in Chile’. Publications of the English Goethe Society. 33 (1): 10–55. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f63ec9be-8f43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Ellis, J M. 1974. ‘Tieck: Der Blonde Eckbert’. In Narration in the German Novelle: Theory and Interpretation, Anglica Germanica. Series 2:77–93. London: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=75660081-8f43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Falkenberg, M. 2005. ‘Ludwig Tieck’s “Der Blonde Eckbert” - The Uncanniness of Indifferent Fate’. In Rethinking the Uncanny in Hoffman and Tieck, Studies in modern German literature:135–60. Oxford: P. Lang. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ge/ge207.
Finkelde, Dominik. 2009. ‘Normativität Und Transgression: Kleists Prinz Friedrich von Homburg Und Die Obszöne Unterseite Des Gesetzes’. German Studies Review 32 (3): 569–89. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/40574867.
Frisch, Max. 1971. Wilhelm Tell Fèur Die Schule. Vol. Suhrkamp Taschenbuch. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Fulbrook, Mary. 1997. German History since 1800. London: Arnold.
Funk, Gerald. 2002. Georg Bèuchner, Dantons Tod. Vol. Erlèauterungen und Dokumente. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Garland, H. 1969. ‘Wilhelm Tell’. In Schiller, the Dramatic Writer: A Study of Style in the Plays, 261–86. Oxford: Clarendon. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=dc36973a-9443-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Graham, I. 1974. ‘Heiliger Dankgesang Eines Genesenen an Die Gottheit’: A Reading of Wilhelm Tell’. In Schiller’s Drama; Talent and Integrity, 195–215. New York: Barnes & Noble Books. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=18bf2322-9743-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Guthrie, J. 1982. ‘The True Dialectic of Dantons Tod: A Reply’. New German Studies. 10: 151–74. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8a656941-9943-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Hampson, Norman. 1968. The Enlightenment. Vol. Pelican books. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Heine, Heinrich, and Manfred Windfuhr. 2003. Die Harzreise. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Hobsbawm, E. J. and Ranger, T. O. 1983. The Invention of Tradition. Vol. Past and present publications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2793877.
Hoffmann, E. T. A. and Drux, Rudolf. 1991. Der Sandmann. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek (Stuttgart, Germany). Stuttgart: Reclam. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3473909.
Holmes, T. M. 1974. ‘The Ideology of the Moderates in Buchner’s “Dantons Tod”’. German Life and Letters 27 (1): 93–100. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1974.tb01585.x.
Homan, R L. 1985. ‘Liberty and the Libertine in Danton’s Death’. Edited by James Redmond M.A. Themes in Drama 7: 129–36. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=05a62141-9f43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Honour, Hugh. 1981. Romanticism. Vol. Pelican books. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
———. 1991. Neo-Classicism. Vol. Style and civilization. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Horton, D. 1984. ‘“Verwirrung” In Deb Blonde Eckbert’. German Life and Letters 37 (4): 322–35. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1984.tb00854.x.
Horton, D. 1989. ‘Modes of Consciousness Representation in Büchner’s Lenz’. German Life and Letters 43 (1): 34–48. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1989.tb00635.x.
Jones, M. V. 1986. ‘Der Sandmann’ and “the Uncanny”: A Sketch for an Alternative Approach’. Paragraph : The Journal of the Modern Critical Theory Group. 7 (1): 77–101. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9834d85b-a343-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Kaiser, D A. 1999. ‘Schiller’s Aesthetic State’. In Romanticism, Aesthetics, and Nationalism, Cambridge studies in Romanticism:39–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ee397128-a443-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Kerry, S S. 1961. ‘Uber Die Asthetische Erziehung Des Menschen’’. In Schiller’s Writings on Aesthetics, Publications of the Faculty of Arts of the University of Manchester:110–69. Manchester, Eng: University Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ge/ge207.
Kleist, Heinrich von. 1996. Die Verlobung in St. Domingo: Das Bettelweib von Locarno ; Der Findling ;Erzèahlungen / Heinrich von Kleist. Anm. von Christine Ruhrberg. Um Anmerkungen ergèanzte Ausg. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek (Stuttgart, Germany). Stuttgart: Reclam. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3473908.
Kleist, Heinrich von and Kleist, Heinrich von. 1993. Die Marquise von O--: Das Erdbeben in Chili : Erzèahlungen. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek (Stuttgart, Germany). Stuttgart: P. Reclam.
Kleist, Heinrich von, and Ernst von Reusner. 1979. Prinz Friedrich von Homburg: Ein Schauspiel. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3473912.
Knight, A H J. 1974. ‘Büchner’s Works’. In Georg Büchner, 68–165. London: Methuen. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=80c5e9ae-a643-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Lamport, F. J. 1981. ‘The Silence of Wilhelm Tell’. The Modern Language Review 76: 857–68. http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/3727194.
Lessing, Gotthold Ephraim, and Wilhelm Grosse. 2002. Die Juden: Ein Lustspiel in Einem Aufzuge Verfertiget Im Jahr 1749. Durchgesehene Ausgabe. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek. Stuttgart: Reclam.
Maass, J. 1983. ‘The Prince of Homburg’. In Kleist: A Biography, 192–99. London: Secker & Warburg. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=8c20e62a-ad43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Maguire, J M. 1978. ‘Perspectives on Revolution: Marx’s Position on the Eve of 1848’. In Marx’s Theory of Politics, 28–47. Cambridge [Eng.]: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=277ae5a2-ad43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Martinson, S. 1996. ‘The Tasks of Culture: Beauty and the Aesthetic Education of the Human Being’. In Harmonious Tensions: The Writings of Friedrich Schiller, 144–92. Newark, N.J.: University of Delaware Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=ec9b7516-b043-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Marx, Karl, and Friedrich Engels. 1985. The Communist Manifesto. Vol. Penguin classics. Harmondsworth: Penguin. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb2884652.
Mason, E E. 1977. ‘In My Beginning Is My End’. German Life and Letters 31 (2): 135–44. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1978.tb00429.x.
McColgan, M. 1978. ‘The True Dialectic of Dantons Tod’. New German Studies 6: 151–74. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=85cf1c5e-b143-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
McGlathery, James M. 1989. ‘Magic and Desire in Eichendorff’s Das Marmorbild’. German Life and Letters 42 (3): 257–68. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1989.tb00939.x.
McInnes, E. 1980. ‘Scepticism, Ideology and History in Buchner’s Dantons Tod’. In For Lionel Thomas: A Collection of Essays Presented in His Memory, 53–69. [Hull, Eng.]: Dept. of German, University of Hull. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=a5204f0e-b243-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
McLellan, D. 1980. ‘Writings 1848-1850’. In The Thought of Karl Marx: An Introduction, 2nd ed, 43–53. London (etc.): Macmillan. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=76a4e554-b243-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Mills, K. 1987. ‘The “Hero” and the Sceptic: The Function of Lacroix in Dantons Tod’. In Büchner in Britain: A Passport to Georg Büchner, 29–37. Bristol: University of Bristol Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=f98a6aff-b343-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Nisbet, H. B. 1982. ‘"Was Ist Aufklärung?”: The Concept of Enlightenment in Eighteenth-Century Germany’. Journal of European Studies 12 (1): 77–95. http://0-journals.sagepub.com.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1177/004724418201204601.
Ockenden, R. C. 1990. ‘Wilhelm Tell as Political Drama’. Oxford German Studies 18: 23–44. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bae5f91d-ba43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Outram, Dorinda. 2005. The Enlightenment. 2nd ed. Vol. New approaches to European history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, J J. 1968. ‘Some Reflections on Georg Büchner’s Lenz and Its Principal Source, the Oberlin Record’. German Life and Letters 21: 103–11. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1968.tb00752.x.
Pascal, R. 1978. ‘Buchner’s Lenz - Style and Message’. Oxford German Studies 9: 68–83. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=d69df230-bd43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Perraudin, M. 1992. ‘Babekan’s “Brille”, and the Rejuvenation of Congo Hoango. A Reinterpretation of Kleist’s Story of the Haitian Revolution’. Oxford German Studies 20 (1): 85–103. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=fc415712-bf43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Prawer, S S. 1961. ‘Germany Revisited’. In Heine, the Tragic Satirist: A Study of the Later Poetry, 1827-1856, 103–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ge/ge207.
Prawer, S. S. 1965. ‘Hoffmann’s Uncanny Guest: A Reading of Der Sandmann’. German Life and Letters 18: 297–308. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1965.tb00084.x.
Prawer, Siegbert Salomon and University of London. 1970. The Romantic Period in Germany: Essays by Members of the London  University Institute of Germanic Studies. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Reddick, J. 1994. ‘Fraud, Futility, Freedom’. In Georg Büchner: The Shattered Whole, 93–120. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=7b746897-c443-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Reed, T. J. 1991. Schiller. Vol. Past masters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Regener, Ursula. 2004. Joseph von Eichendorff, Das Marmorbild. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek (Stuttgart, Germany). Stuttgart: P. Reclam.
Reiss, Hans. 1955. The Political Thought of the German Romantics, 1793-1815. Vol. Political texts. Oxford: Blackwell.
Robertson, Ritchie. 1998. ‘“Dies Hohe Lied Der Duldung”? The Ambiguities of Toleration in Lessing’s “Die Juden and Nathan Der Weise”’. The Modern Language Review 93 (1). https://doi.org/10.2307/3733627.
Sagarra, Eda. 1977. A Social History of Germany, 1648-1914. London: Methuen.
———. 1980. An Introduction to Nineteenth Century Germany. Harlow: Longman.
Sagarra, Eda, and Peter N. Skrine. 1999. A Companion to German Literature: From 1500 to the Present. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers.
Sammons, Jeffrey L. 1979. Heinrich Heine: A Modern Biography. Manchester: Carcanet New Press. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3278588.
Savile, A. 1987. ‘Beauty and the Ideal of Man’. In Aesthetic Reconstructions: The Seminal Writings of Lessing, Kant and Schiller, Aristotelian Society series:195–218. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=55764fec-cb43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Schiller, Friedrich. 1990. Maria Stuart: Trauerspiel in Fünf Aufzügen. Um Anmerkungen ergänzte Ausg. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek. Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam jun.
Schiller, Friedrich and Walzel, Oskar F. n.d. Wilhelm Tell: Schauspiel. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek (Stuttgart, Germany). Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam Jun. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3473911.
Schmidt, Ricarda. 2005. ‘Male Foibles, Female Critique and Narrative Capriciousness: On the Function of Gender in Conceptions of Art and Subjectivity in E.T.A. Hoffmann’. In From Goethe to Gide: Feminism, Aesthetics and the French and Germany Literary Canon, 1770-1936, 49–64. Exeter: University of Exeter Press. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ge/ge207.
Sharpe, L. 1982. ‘Wilhelm Tell’. In Schiller and the Historical Character: Presentation and Interpretation in the Historiographical Works and in the Historical Dramas, Oxford modern languages and literature monographs:142–73. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=9d48e875-cf43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
———. 1991. ‘Weimar: The Later Dramas’. In Friedrich Schiller: Drama, Thought and Politics, Cambridge studies in German:251–313. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=479e6985-cf43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Sharpe, Lesley. 1991. Friedrich Schiller: Drama, Thought and Politics. Vol. Cambridge studies in German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CBO9780511597749.
Stahl, E L. 1961. ‘Prinz Friedrich von Homburg’. In Heinrich von Kleist’s Dramas, 103–15. London: Blackwell. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ge/ge207.
Stephens, A. 1994. ‘Das Erdbeben in Chili - Die Verlobung in St. Domingo’. In Heinrich von Kleist: The Dramas and Stories, 194–211. Oxford: Berg. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=6732f21c-d543-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Stern, J P. 1964. ‘A World of Suffering: Georg Buchner’. In Re-Interpretations: Seven Studies in Nineteenth-Century German Literature, 78–155. London: Thames and Hudson. http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/services/library/search/extracts/ge/ge207.
Swales, M. 1975a. ‘Ontology, Politics, Sexuality. A Note on Georg Buchner’s Drama Dantons Tod’. New German Studies 3: 109–25. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=27ef8c33-d743-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
———. 1975b. ‘Reading One’s Life: An Analysis of Tieck’s Der Blonde Eckbert’. German Life and Letters 29 (1): 165–75. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1468-0483.1975.tb00157.x.
Tieck, Ludwig. 1952. Der Blonde Eckbert: Der Runenberg ; Die Elfen. Vol. Universal-Bibliothek (Stuttgart, Germany). Stuttgart: Philipp Reclam. http://encore.lib.warwick.ac.uk/iii/encore/record/C__Rb3473910.
Tuveson, E L. 1984. ‘The Millenarian Structure of The Communist Manifesto’. In The Apocalypse in English Renaissance Thought and Literature: Patterns, Antecedents and Repercussions, 323–41. Manchester: Manchester University Press. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=bb0c7347-dc43-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.
Vaughan, William. 1980. German Romantic Painting. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Wagner, Y., and M. Strauss. 1969. ‘The Programme of the Communist Manifesto and Its Theoretical Foundations’. Political Studies 17 (4): 470–84. http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1969.tb00746.x.
Wright, E. 1978. ‘The Language of Omens in Hoffmann’s Der Sandmann and Tieck’s Liebeszauber’. In E.T.A. Hoffmann and the Rhetoric of Terror: Aspects of Language Used for the Evocation of Fear, Bithell series of dissertations:75–115. London: University of London, Institute of Germanic Studies. https://contentstore.cla.co.uk/secure/link?id=4105fd8a-e843-e611-80bd-0cc47a6bddeb.