[1]
L. M. Antony, Mind of one’s own, 2nd ed. Westview Press, 2002.
[2]
Haslanger, Sally Anne, Resisting reality: social construction and social critique. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892631.001.0001
[3]
Fricker, Miranda and Hornsby, Jennifer, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy, vol. Cambridge companions to philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1017/CCOL0521624517
[4]
Hornsby, Jennifer and Fricker, Miranda, The Cambridge companion to feminism in philosophy, vol. Cambridge companions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
[5]
Jaggar, Alison M. and Bordo, Susan, Gender / body / knowledge: feminist reconstructions of being and knowing. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1989.
[6]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[7]
Witt, Charlotte, Feminist metaphysics: explorations in the ontology of sex, gender and identity. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-90-481-3783-1
[8]
Beauvoir, Simone de, Borde, Constance, and Malovany-Chevallier, Sheila, The second sex. London: Jonathan Cape, 2009.
[9]
Lloyd, Genevieve, The man of reason: ‘male’ and ‘female’ in Western philosophy, 2nd ed., vol. Ideas. London: Routledge, 1993.
[10]
Welton, Donn, Body and flesh: a philosophical reader. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1998.
[11]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[12]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[13]
Okin, Susan Moller, Justice, gender, and the family. New York: Basic Books, 1989.
[14]
Kymlicka, Will, Contemporary political philosophy: an introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[15]
D. Satz, ‘Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2004. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-family/
[16]
Williams, Joan, Unbending gender: why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
[17]
Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona, Eds, Women in philosophy: what needs to change? New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199325603.001.0001
[18]
Hutchison, Katrina and Jenkins, Fiona, Eds, Women in philosophy: what needs to change? New York: Oxford University Press, 2014. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199325603.001.0001
[19]
C. CALHOUN, ‘The Undergraduate Pipeline Problem’, Hypatia, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 216–223, Apr. 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2009.01040.x
[20]
C. Calhoun, ‘The Undergraduate Pipeline Problem’’, Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 216–223, 2009.
[21]
S. Haslanger, ‘Changing the Ideology and Culture of Philosophy: Not by Reason (Alone)’, Hypatia, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 210–223, 2008, Available: http://0-muse.jhu.edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/journals/hypatia/v023/23.2.haslanger.html
[22]
British Philosophical Association and Society for Women in Philosophy UK, ‘Women in Philosophy in the UK’. 2011. Available: http://www.bpa.ac.uk/uploads/2011/02/BPA_Report_Women_In_Philosophy.pdf
[23]
A. Garry, ‘Analytic Feminism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2004. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/femapproach-analytic/
[24]
‘What is it like to be a woman in philosophy?’ Available: http://beingawomaninphilosophy.wordpress.com/
[25]
‘SWIP UK: The UK Society for Women in Philosophy’. Available: http://swipuk.org/
[26]
‘Feminist Philosophers | News feminist philosophers can use’. Available: http://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/
[27]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[28]
Elizabeth Anderson, ‘Recent Thinking about Sexual Harassment: A Review Essay’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 284–311, 2006, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/3876394?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Recent&searchText=Thinking&searchText=about&searchText=Sexual&searchText=Harassment:&searchText=A&searchText=Review&searchText=Essay&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DRecent%252BThinking%252Babout%252BSexual%252BHarassment%25253A%252BA%252BReview%252BEssay%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100428%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[29]
E. Anderson, ‘Recent Thinking about Sexual Harassment: A Review Essay’, Philosophy and public affairs, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 284–311, 2006.
[30]
J. Crosthwaite and G. Priest, ‘The definition of sexual harassment’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 66–82, Mar. 1996, doi: 10.1080/00048409612347071
[31]
J. Saul, ‘Stop Thinking So Much About “Sexual Harassment”’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, p. n/a-n/a, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.1111/japp.12058
[32]
Australasian Association of Philosophy and Australasian Association of Psychology and Philosophy, ‘The definition of sexual harassment’, Australasian journal of philosophy, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 66–82, 1996.
[33]
J. ROCHA, ‘The Sexual Harassment Coercive Offer’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 203–216, May 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2010.00508.x
[34]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[35]
L. Shrage, ‘Feminist Perspectives on Sex Markets (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2004. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminist-sex-markets/
[36]
Rae Langton, ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 293–330, 1993, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2265469?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Speech&searchText=Acts&searchText=and&searchText=Unspeakable&searchText=Acts&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DSpeech%252BActs%252Band%252BUnspeakable%252BActs%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100428%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[37]
R. Langton, ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts’, Philosophy and public affairs, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 293–330, 1993.
[38]
Catherine A. MacKinnon, ‘Sexuality, Pornography, and Method: "Pleasure under Patriarchy’, Ethics, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 314–346, 1989, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2381437?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Sexuality,&searchText=Pornography,&searchText=and&searchText=Method:&searchText=%2527Pleasure&searchText=Under&searchText=Patriarchy&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DSexuality%25252C%252BPornography%25252C%252Band%252BMethod%25253A%252B%252527Pleasure%252BUnder%252BPatriarchy%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100153%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[39]
C. A. MacKinnon, ‘Sexuality, Pornography, and Method: "Pleasure under Patriarchy’, Ethics: an international journal of social, political and legal philosophy, vol. 99, no. 2, pp. 314–346, 1989.
[40]
Jennifer Saul, ‘Pornography, Speech Acts and Context’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, vol. 106, pp. 229–248, 2006, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/4545459?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Pornography,&searchText=Speech&searchText=Acts&searchText=and&searchText=Context&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DPornography%25252C%252BSpeech%252BActs%252Band%252BContext%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj101348%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[41]
J. Saul, ‘Pornography, Speech Acts and Context’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society for Systematic Study of Philosophy, vol. 106, pp. 229–248, 2006.
[42]
J. GAUTHIER, ‘Prostitution, Sexual Autonomy, and Sex Discrimination’, Hypatia, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 166–186, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2010.01126.x
[43]
Debra Satz, ‘Markets in Women’s Sexual Labor’, Ethics, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 63–85, 1995, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2382005?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Markets&searchText=in&searchText=Women%2527s&searchText=Sexual&searchText=Labor&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DMarkets%252Bin%252BWomen%252527s%252BSexual%252BLabor%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100153%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[44]
D. Satz, ‘Markets in Women’s Sexual Labor’, Ethics: an international journal of social, political and legal philosophy, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 63–85, 1995.
[45]
Nussbaum, Martha Craven, Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[46]
Lars O. Ericsson, ‘Charges Against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment’, Ethics, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 335–366, 1980, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2380575?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Charges&searchText=Against&searchText=Prostitution:&searchText=An&searchText=Attempt&searchText=at&searchText=a&searchText=Philosophical&searchText=Assessment&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DCharges%252BAgainst%252BProstitution%25253A%252BAn%252BAttempt%252Bat%252Ba%252BPhilosophical%252BAssessment%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100153%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[47]
‘Charges Against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment’, Ethics: an international journal of social, political and legal philosophy, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 335–366, 1980.
[48]
Carole Pateman, ‘Defending Prostitution: Charges Against Ericsson’, Ethics, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 561–565, 1983, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/2380632?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Defending&searchText=Prostitution:&searchText=Charges&searchText=Against&searchText=Ericsson&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DDefending%252BProstitution%25253A%252BCharges%252BAgainst%252BEricsson%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100153%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[49]
C. Pateman, ‘Defending Prostitution: Charges Against Ericsson’, Ethics: an international journal of social, political and legal philosophy, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 561–565, 1983.
[50]
Scott A. Anderson, ‘Prostitution and Sexual Autonomy: Making Sense of the Prohibition of Prostitution*’, Ethics, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 748–780, 2002, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/339672?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Prostitution&searchText=and&searchText=Sexual&searchText=Autonomy:&searchText=Making&searchText=Sense&searchText=of&searchText=the&searchText=Prohibition&searchText=of&searchText=Prostitution&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DProstitution%252Band%252BSexual%252BAutonomy%25253A%252BMaking%252BSense%252Bof%252Bthe%252BProhibition%252Bof%252BProstitution%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100153%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[51]
S. A. Anderson, ‘Prostitution and Sexual Autonomy: Making Sense of the Prohibition of Prostitution’, Ethics: an international journal of social, political and legal philosophy, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 748–780, 2002.
[52]
Hallie Rose Liberto, ‘Normalizing Prostitution versus Normalizing the Alienability of Sexual Rights: A Response to Scott A. Anderson*’, Ethics, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 138–145, 2009, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/644624
[53]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[54]
A. J. Cahill, ‘Feminist Pleasure and Feminine Beautification’, Hypatia, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 42–64, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2003.tb01412.x
[55]
A. J. Cahill, ‘Feminist Pleasure and Feminine Beautification’, Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 42–64, 2003.
[56]
E. (Lina) Papadaki, ‘Feminist Perspectives on Objectification (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2010. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-objectification/
[57]
K. P. Morgan, ‘Women and the Knife: Cosmetic Surgery and the Colonization of Women’s Bodies’, Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 25–53, 1991.
[58]
Crasnow, Sharon L. and Superson, Anita M., Out from the shadows: analytical feminist contributions to traditional philosophy, vol. Studies in feminist philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199855469.001.0001
[59]
C. West, ‘Pornography and Censorship (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2004. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pornography-censorship/
[60]
De Marneffe, Peter, Liberalism and prostitution, vol. Oxford political philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383249.001.0001
[61]
L. Shrage, ‘Prostitution and the Case for Decriminalization’, Dissent, vol. 43, pp. 41–45, 1996.
[62]
R. Whisnant, ‘Feminist Perspectives on Rape (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2009. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-rape/
[63]
D. Archard, Sexual consent. Westview Press 1998.
[64]
Lois Pineau, ‘Date Rape: A Feminist Analysis’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 217–243, 1989, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/3504696?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Date&searchText=Rape&searchText=A&searchText=Feminist&searchText=Analysis&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DDate%252BRape%252BA%252BFeminist%252BAnalysis%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100561%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[65]
Douglas N. Husak and George C. Thomas III, ‘Date Rape, Social Convention, and Reasonable Mistakes’, Law and Philosophy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 95–126, 1992, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/3504905?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%2527Date%2520Rape,%2520Social%2520Convention,%2520and%2520Reasonable%2520Mistakes%2527&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253D%252527Date%252BRape%25252C%252BSocial%252BConvention%25252C%252Band%252BReasonable%252BMistakes%252527%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100561%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[66]
MacKinnon, Catharine A., Toward a feminist theory of the state. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1989.
[67]
Anderson, Michelle J., ‘Negotiating Sex’, Southern California Law Review, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1401–1438, 2004, Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/scal78&id=1415&collection=journals&index=journals/scal#1415
[68]
M. Anderson, ‘Negotiating Sex’, Southern California law review, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 1401–1438, 2005.
[69]
Anderson, Michelle J., ‘All-American Rape’, St. John’s Law Review, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 625–644, 2005, Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/stjohn79&id=635&collection=journals&index=journals/stjohn#635
[70]
K. Burgess-Jackson, ‘A Crime against Women: Calhoun on the Wrongness of Rape’, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 286–293, Aug. 2000, doi: 10.1111/0047-2786.00046
[71]
Ann J. Cahill, Rethinking rape. Cornell University Press, 2001.
[72]
A. J. Cahill, ‘In Defense of Self-Defense’, Philosophical Papers, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 363–380, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1080/05568640903420913
[73]
M. Mikkola, ‘Feminist Perspectives on Sex and Gender (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2008. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/
[74]
Butler, Judith, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, 2nd ed., vol. Routledge classics. New York: Routledge, 2006. Available: https://www.dawsonera.com/guard/protected/dawson.jsp?name=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth&dest=http://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9780203824979
[75]
Butler, Judith, Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity, vol. Routledge classics. New York: Routledge, 2006.
[76]
M. Mikkola, ‘Elizabeth Spelman, Gender Realism, and Women’, Hypatia, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 77–96, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.2006.tb01129.x
[77]
M. Mikkola, ‘Elizabeth Spelman, Gender Realism, and Women’, Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 77–96, 2006.
[78]
Witt, Charlotte, Feminist metaphysics: explorations in the ontology of sex, gender and identity. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-90-481-3783-1
[79]
Witt, Charlotte, Feminist metaphysics: explorations in the ontology of sex, gender and identity. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1007/978-90-481-3783-1
[80]
Sally Haslanger, ‘Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?’, Noûs, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–55, 2000, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/2671972
[81]
S. Haslanger, ‘Gender and Race: (What) Are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?’, Noûs, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 31–55, 2000.
[82]
Theodore Bach, ‘Gender Is a Natural Kind with a Historical Essence*’, Ethics, vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 231–272, 2012, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.1086/663232?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=%2527Gender%2520is%2520a%2520Natural%2520Kind%2520with%2520a%2520Historical%2520Essence%2527&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253D%252527Gender%252Bis%252Ba%252BNatural%252BKind%252Bwith%252Ba%252BHistorical%252BEssence%252527%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj100153%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[83]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[84]
M. A. Slote, Ethics of care and empathy. Routledge, 2007.
[85]
Copp, David, The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195325911.001.0001
[86]
Copp, David, The Oxford handbook of ethical theory, vol. Oxford handbooks in philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[87]
Walker, Rebecca L. and Ivanhoe, P. J., Working virtue: virtue ethics and contemporary moral problems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
[88]
Held, Virginia, The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/0195180992.001.0001
[89]
Held, Virginia, The ethics of care: personal, political, and global. New York: Oxford University Press, 2006.
[90]
Kymlicka, Will, Contemporary political philosophy: an introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
[91]
Noddings, Nel, Caring, a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986. Available: http://lib.myilibrary.com/ProductDetail.aspx?id=510032&entityid=https://idp.warwick.ac.uk/idp/shibboleth
[92]
Noddings, Nel, Caring: a feminine approach to ethics & moral education, 2nd ed. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2003.
[93]
Gilligan, Carol, In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1982.
[94]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[95]
E. Anderson, ‘Feminist Epistemology and Philosophy of Science (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)’, 2000. Available: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-epistemology/
[96]
Fricker, Miranda, Epistemic injustice: power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
[97]
E. ANDERSON, ‘Feminist Epistemology: An Interpretation and a Defense’, Hypatia, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 50–84, Aug. 1995, doi: 10.1111/j.1527-2001.1995.tb00737.x
[98]
E. Anderson, ‘Feminist epistemology: an interpretation and a defense.’, Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 50–84, 1995.
[99]
Helen E. Longino and Kathleen Lennon, ‘Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, vol. 71, pp. 19–54, 1997, Available: http://0-www.jstor.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/stable/10.2307/4106954?Search=yes&resultItemClick=true&searchText=Feminist&searchText=Epistemology&searchText=as&searchText=a&searchText=Local&searchText=Epistemology&searchUri=%252Faction%252FdoBasicSearch%253FQuery%253DFeminist%252BEpistemology%252Bas%252Ba%252BLocal%252BEpistemology%2526amp%253Bfilter%253Djid%25253A10.2307%25252Fj101223%2526amp%253BSearch%253DSearch%2526amp%253Bwc%253Don%2526amp%253Bfc%253Doff%2526amp%253BglobalSearch%253D%2526amp%253BsbbBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbjBox%253D%2526amp%253BsbpBox%253D
[100]
H. E. Longino and K. Lennon, ‘Feminist Epistemology as a Local Epistemology’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: Supplementary volume, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 19–36, 1997.
[101]
Greco, John and Sosa, Ernest, The Blackwell guide to epistemology, vol. Blackwell philosophy guides. Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishers, 1999.
[102]
E. Anderson, ‘Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions’, Social Epistemology, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 163–173, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1080/02691728.2011.652211
[103]
Saul, Jennifer Mather, Feminism: issues & arguments. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003.
[104]
E. F. Kittay, Blackwell guide to feminist philosophy. Blackwell Publishers, 2007.
[105]
Crenshaw, Kimberle, ‘Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, vol. 1989, pp. 139–167, 1989, Available: http://0-heinonline.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/uchclf1989&id=143&collection=journals&index=journals/uchclf#143
[106]
K. Jones, ‘Intersectionality and ameliorative analyses of race and gender’, Philosophical Studies, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0245-0
[107]
S. Haslanger, ‘Race, intersectionality, and method: a reply to critics’, Philosophical Studies, Dec. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s11098-013-0244-1
[108]
F. Dzodan, ‘My Feminism will be Intersectional or it will be Bullshit!’, 2011. Available: http://tigerbeatdown.com/2011/10/10/my-feminism-will-be-intersectional-or-it-will-be-bullshit/
[109]
‘1 in 2 and 77.7p - gender, disability, violence and pay gaps’. Available: http://libcom.org/library/1-2-777p-gender-disability-violence-pay-gaps
[110]
Nussbaum, Martha Craven, Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
[111]
Khader, Serene J., Adaptive preferences and women’s empowerment, vol. Studies in feminist philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011. Available: http://0-dx.doi.org.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199777884.001.0001
[112]
S. BERGES, ‘Why Women Hug their Chains: Wollstonecraft and Adaptive Preferences’, Utilitas, vol. 23, no. 01, pp. 72–87, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1017/S0953820810000452
