1.
Dutfield, Graham, Suthersanen, Uma: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
2.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
3.
Goodin, R.E., Pettit, P., Pogge, T.: A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2012).
4.
Goodin, Robert E., Pettit, Philip: A Companion to contemporary political philosophy. Blackwell, Oxford, UK (1998).
5.
Gosseries, Axel, Marciano, Alain, Strowel, Alain: Intellectual property and theories of justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke [England] (2008).
6.
Edwin C. Hettinger: Justifying Intellectual Property. Philosophy & Public Affairs. 18, 31–52 (1989).
7.
D. B. Resnik: A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property. Journal of Business Ethics. 46, 319–335 (2003).
8.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
9.
Drahos, P.: Global property rights in information: the story of TRIPS at the GATT. Prometheus. 13, 6–19 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1080/08109029508629187.
10.
Fischer-Lescano, Andreas: Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law. Michigan Journal of International Law. 25, 999–1046 (2003).
11.
Helfer, Laurence R.: Regime Shifting: The TRIPs Agreement and New Dynamics of International Intellectual Property Lawmaking. Yale Journal of International Law. 29, 1–83 (2004).
12.
Maskus, K.E., Penubarti, M.: How trade-related are intellectual property rights? Journal of International Economics. 39, 227–248 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(95)01377-8.
13.
Sell, S., May, C.: Moments in Law: Contestation and Settlement in the History of Intellectual Property. Review of International Political Economy. 8, 467–500 (2001).
14.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
15.
Frederick M. Abbott: The WTO Medicines Decision: World Pharmaceutical Trade and the Protection of Public Health. The American Journal of International Law. 99, 317–358 (2005).
16.
Kuanpoth, J.: Patents and access to medicines in Thailand – the DDI case and beyond. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 149–158 (2006).
17.
Matthews, D.: From the August 30, 2003 WTO decision to the December 6, 2005 agreement on an amendment to TRIPS: improving access to medicines in developing countries? Intellectual Property Quarterly. 91–130 (2006).
18.
Pogge, T.W.: Human rights and global health: a research program. Metaphilosophy. 36, 182–209 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2005.00362.x.
19.
Rangnekar, D.: Context and Ambiguity in the Making of Law: A Comment on Amending India’s Patent Act. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 10, 365–387 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2007.00327.x.
20.
Dwijen Rangnekar: The Supreme Court Judgment. Economic and Political Weekly. 48, 39–40 (2013).
21.
Scherer, F.M.: Post-TRIPS Options for Access to Patented Medicines in Developing Nations. Journal of International Economic Law. 5, 913–939 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/5.4.913.
22.
Susan K. Sell and Aseem Prakash: Using Ideas Strategically: The Contest between Business and NGO Networks in Intellectual Property Rights. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 143–175 (2004).
23.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
24.
Aoki, Keith: Reclaiming Common Heritage Treatment in the International Plant Genetic Resources Regime Complex. Michigan State Law Review. 2007, 35–70 (2007).
25.
Tansey, G., Rajotte, T.: The future control of food: a guide to international negotiations and rules on intellectual property, biodiversity and food security. Earthscan, London (2008).
26.
Final report: Assessing the economic implications of different models for implementing the requirement to protect plant varieties Report Work Package 6 Impacts of the IPR Rules on Sustainable Development, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_final_report.pdf.
27.
Muriel Lightbourne, Graham Dutfield: Review of Literature: Law, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_legal_literature_review.pdf.
28.
Dr Dwijen Rangnekar: Review of Literature: Economics, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_economic_literature_review.pdf.
29.
Country case studies: Bulgaria, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_bulgaria_case_study.pdf.
30.
Muriel Lightbourne, Lois Muraguri: Country case studies: China, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_china_case_study.pdf.
31.
Muriel Lightbourne: Country case studies: Ethiopia, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_ethiopia_case_study.pdf.
32.
Dr Dwijen Rangnekar: Country case studies: India, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_india_case_study.pdf.
33.
Dr Dwijen Rangnekar: Country case studies: Kenya, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_kenya_case_study.pdf.
34.
Mr. Ivan Ivanov, Dr. Burcak Yildiz *, Mrs.Ofelia Tsonkova, Mrs. Tatiana Mateeva: Country case studies: Turkey, http://www.ecologic.de/download/projekte/1800-1849/1802/wp6_turkey_case_study.pdf.
35.
Glenn E. Bugos and Daniel J. Kevles: Plants as Intellectual Property: American Practice, Law, and Policy in World Context. Osiris. 7, 74–104 (1992).
36.
Oguamanam, Chidi: Regime Tension in the Intellectual Property Rights Arena: Farmers’ Rights and Post-TRIPS Counter Regime Trends. Dalhousie Law Journal. 29, 413–453 (2006).
37.
Van Overwalle, Geertrui: Patent Protection for Plants: A Comparison of American and European Approaches. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology. 39, 143–194 (1998).
38.
Pottage, Alain: Organisms and Manufactures: On the History of Plant Inventions. Melbourne University Law Review. 31, 539–568 (2007).
39.
Rangnekar, D.: Geneva Rhetoric, National Reality: The Political Economy of Introducing Plant Breeders’ Rights in Kenya. New Political Economy. 19, 359–383 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2013.796445.
40.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
41.
Orit Fischman Afori: The battle over public e-libraries - taking stock and moving ahead. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 44, 392–417 (2013).
42.
James Boyle: The Second Enclosure Movement and the Construction of the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, 33–74 (2003).
43.
Brennan, D.J.: The three step test frenzy - why the TRIPs panel decision might be considered per incuriam. Intellectual Property Quarterly. 212–225 (2002).
44.
Chon, Margaret: Intellectual Property from Below: Copyright and Capability for Education. U.C. Davis Law Review. 40, (2006).
45.
Davies, P.: Access v contract: competing freedoms in the context of copyright limitations and exceptions for libraries. European Intellectual Property Review. 35, 402–414 (2013).
46.
David Lange: Reimagining the Public Domain. Law and Contemporary Problems. 66, 463–483 (2003).
47.
Lawrence Liang: Porous Legalities and Avenues of Participation, http://preview.sarai.net/journal/05_pdf/01/02_lawrence.pdf.
48.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
49.
Isabella Alexander: Criminalising Copyright: A Story of Publishers, Pirates and Pieces of Eight. The Cambridge Law Journal. 66, 625–656 (2007).
50.
Thomas Hays: The evolution and decentralisation of secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 1. European Intellectual Property Review. 28, 617–624 (2006).
51.
Hays, T.: Secondary liability for infringements of copyright-protected works: Part 2. European Intellectual Property Review. 29, 15–21 (2007).
52.
Lawrence Lessig: The Architecture of Innovation. Duke Law Journal. 51, 1783–1801 (2002).
53.
Glynn S. Lunney, Jr.: The Death of Copyright: Digital Technology, Private Copying, and the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Virginia Law Review. 87, 813–920 (2001).
54.
Felix Oberholzer-Gee: File Sharing and Copyright. Innovation Policy and the Economy. 10, 19–55 (2010).
55.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
56.
Raustiala, K., Munzer, S.R.: The Global Struggle over Geographic Indications. European Journal of International Law. 18, 337–365 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chm016.
57.
Tomer Broude: Taking ‘Trade and Culture’ Seriously: Geographical Indications and Cultural Protection in WTO Law. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law. 26, 623–692 (2005).
58.
Dev Gangjee: Say cheese! A sharper image of generic use through the lens of Feta. European Intellectual Property Review. 29, 172–179 (2007).
59.
Handler, Michael: WTO Geographical Indications Dispute, The. Modern Law Review. 69, 70–91 (2006).
60.
Dr Dwijen Rangnekar ed: The Journal of World Intellectual Property. Journal of World Intellectual Property. 13,.
61.
Rangnekar, D.: Remaking place: the social construction of a Geographical Indication for Feni. Environment and Planning A. 43, 2043–2059 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1068/a43259.
62.
Madhavi Sunder: The Invention of Traditional Knowledge. Law and Contemporary Problems. 70, 97–124 (2007).
63.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
64.
Schroeder, Doris: Justice and the Convention on Biological Diversity. Ethics & International Affairs. 23, 267–280.
65.
Stephanie Bucher: The protection of genetic resources and indigenous knowledge: disclosure of origin on the international and Latin-American agenda. International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law. 39, 35–50 (2008).
66.
Buck, M., Hamilton, C.: The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law. 20, 47–61 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2011.00703.x.
67.
Coombe, R.J.: Legal Claims to Culture in and Against the Market: Neoliberalism and the Global Proliferation of Meaningful Difference. Law, Culture and the Humanities. 1, 35–52 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1191/1743872105lw010oa.
68.
Dutfield, G.: A critical analysis of the debate on traditional knowledge, drug discovery and patent-based biopiracy. European Intellectual Property Review. 33, 238–244 (2011).
69.
Morgera, E., Tsioumani, E.: The Evolution of Benefit Sharing: Linking Biodiversity and Community Livelihoods. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law. 19, 150–173 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2010.00674.x.
70.
John B. Kleba, Dwijen Rangneka: Fairness and equity: interrogating the Nagoya protocol:  Special issue. Law, Environment and Development Journal. 9, (2013).
71.
Dutfield, G., Suthersanen, U.: Global intellectual property law: commentary and materials. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2008).
72.
Menescal, A.K.: Changing WIPO’S Ways?. The 2004 Development Agenda in Historical Perspective. The Journal of World Intellectual Property. 8, 761–796 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1796.2005.tb00277.x.
73.
de Beer, J.: Implementing the World Intellectual Property Organization’s development agenda. , Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2009.
74.
Amy Kapczynski: The Access to Knowledge Mobilization and the New Politics of Intellectual Property. The Yale Law Journal. 117, 804–885 (2008).
75.
Maskus, Keith E.: Lessons from Studying the International Economics of Intellectual Property Rights. Vanderbilt Law Review. 53, 2219–2239 (2000).
76.
May, C.: The World Intellectual Property Organisation and the Development Agenda. Global Society. 22, 97–113 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701740753.
77.
Yu, Peter K.: Tale of Two Development Agendas, A. Ohio Northern University Law Review. 35, 465–573 (2009).