[1]
A. N. Prior 1960. The Runabout Inference-Ticket. Analysis. 21, 2 (1960), 38–39.
[2]
Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. 1987. The Liar: an essay on truth and circularity. Oxford University Press.
[3]
Beall, J.C. 2007. Revenge of the liar: new essays on the paradox. Oxford University Press.
[4]
Beall, J.C. and Armour-Garb, B.P. eds. 2008. Deflationism and paradox. Clarendon Press.
[5]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[6]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[7]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[8]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[9]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[10]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[11]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[12]
Blackburn, S. and Simmons, K. 1999. Truth. Oxford University Press.
[13]
Boolos, G. et al. 2007. Computability and logic. Cambridge University Press.
[14]
Butler, R.J. 1962. Analytical philosophy. Blackwell.
[15]
Caret, C.R. and Hjortland, O.T. eds. 2015. Foundations of logical consequence. Oxford University Press.
[16]
Cartwright, R. 1987. Philosophical essays. MIT Press.
[17]
Craig, E. and Routledge (Firm) 1998. Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge.
[18]
Craig, E. and Routledge (Firm) 1998. Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge.
[19]
Craig, E. and Routledge (Firm) 1998. Routledge encyclopedia of philosophy. Routledge.
[20]
Curry’s Paradox: https://0-plato-stanford-edu.pugwash.lib.warwick.ac.uk/entries/curry-paradox/.
[21]
Dietz, R. and Moruzzi, S. 2009. Cuts and clouds: vagueness, its nature, and its logic. Oxford University Press.
[22]
Donald Davidson 1996. The Folly of Trying to Define Truth. The Journal of Philosophy. 93, 6 (1996), 263–278.
[23]
Donald Davidson 1996. The Folly of Trying to Define Truth. The Journal of Philosophy. 93, 6 (1996), 263–278.
[24]
Etchemendy, J. 1990. The concept of logical consequence. Harvard University Press.
[25]
Etchemendy, J. 1990. The concept of logical consequence. Harvard University Press.
[26]
Field, H.H. 2008. Saving truth from paradox. Oxford University Press.
[27]
Haack, S. 1978. Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press.
[28]
Haack, S. 1978. Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press.
[29]
Haack, S. 1978. Philosophy of logics. Cambridge University Press.
[30]
Haack, S. and Haack, S. 1996. Deviant logic, fuzzy logic: beyond the formalism. University of Chicago Press.
[31]
Hale, B. 1997. A companion to the philosophy of language. Blackwell.
[32]
Horwich, P. 1998. Truth. Clarendon.
[33]
Horwich, P. 1998. Truth. Clarendon.
[34]
Horwich, P. 1998. Truth. Clarendon.
[35]
Horwich, P. 1998. Truth. Clarendon.
[36]
Hughes, R.I.G. 1993. A philosophical companion to first-order logic. Hackett Pub. Co.
[37]
Hughes, R.I.G. 1993. A philosophical companion to first-order logic. Hackett Pub. Co.
[38]
Hughes, R.I.G. 1993. A philosophical companion to first-order logic. Hackett Pub. Co.
[39]
Jacquette, D. 2002. Philosophy of logic: an anthology. Blackwell Publishers.
[40]
Jacquette, D. 2002. Philosophy of logic: an anthology. Blackwell Publishers.
[41]
Keefe, R. and Smith, P. 1999. Vagueness: a reader. MIT Press.
[42]
Keefe, R. and Smith, P. 1999. Vagueness: a reader. MIT Press.
[43]
Kripke, S. 1975. Outline of a Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy. 72, 19 (1975), 690–716.
[44]
Künne, W. 2005. Conceptions of truth. Clarendon.
[45]
Logical Consequence: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-consequence/.
[46]
Logical Constants: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-constants/.
[47]
Maudlin, T. 2004. Truth and paradox: solving the riddles. Clarendon.
[48]
Maudlin, T. 2004. Truth and paradox: solving the riddles. Clarendon.
[49]
McGee, V. 1991. Truth, vagueness, and paradox: an essay on the logic of truth. Hackett Pub. Co.
[50]
Nuel D. Belnap 1962. Tonk, Plonk and Plink. Analysis. 22, 6 (1962), 130–134.
[51]
Patterson, D. 2012. Alfred Tarski: philosophy of language and logic. Palgrave Macmillan.
[52]
Patterson, D. 2008. New essays on Tarski and philosophy. Oxford University Press.
[53]
Patterson, D. 2008. New essays on Tarski and philosophy. Oxford University Press.
[54]
Quine, W.V. 1986. Philosophy of logic. Harvard University Press.
[55]
Quine, W.V. 1986. Philosophy of logic. Harvard University Press.
[56]
Quine, W.V. 1986. Philosophy of logic. Harvard University Press.
[57]
Quine, W.V. 1986. Philosophy of logic. Harvard University Press.
[58]
Quine, W.V. 1976. The ways of paradox, and other essays. Harvard University Press.
[59]
Read, S. 1995. Thinking about logic: an introduction to the philosophy of logic. Oxford University Press.
[60]
Read, S. 1995. Thinking about logic: an introduction to the philosophy of logic. Oxford University Press.
[61]
Read, S. 1995. Thinking about logic: an introduction to the philosophy of logic. Oxford University Press.
[62]
Read, S. 1995. Thinking about logic: an introduction to the philosophy of logic. Oxford University Press.
[63]
Review by: R. M. Sainsbury 1995. Review: Vagueness, Ignorance, and Margin for Error. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 46, 4 (1995), 589–601.
[64]
Rumfitt, I. 2015. The boundary stones of thought: an essay in the philosophy of logic. Oxford University Press.
[65]
Sainsbury, R.M. 2001. Logical forms: an introduction to philosophical logic. Blackwell Publishing.
[66]
Sainsbury, R.M. 1991. Logical forms: an introduction to philosophical logic. Blackwell.
[67]
Sainsbury, R.M. 2009. Paradoxes. Cambridge University Press.
[68]
Sainsbury, R.M. 2009. Paradoxes. Cambridge University Press.
[69]
Shapiro, S. 2007. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press.
[70]
Shapiro, S. 2005. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press.
[71]
Shapiro, S. 2007. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press.
[72]
Shapiro, S. 2005. The Oxford handbook of philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford University Press.
[73]
Shapiro, S. 2006. Vagueness in context. Clarendon.
[74]
Soames, S. 1999. Understanding truth. Oxford University Press.
[75]
Soames, S. 1999. Understanding truth. Oxford University Press.
[76]
Soames, S. 1999. Understanding truth. Oxford University Press.
[77]
Soames, S. 1999. Understanding truth. Oxford University Press.
[78]
Sorensen, Roy Vagueness.
[79]
Strawson, P.F. 1967. Philosophical logic. Oxford University P.
[80]
Strawson, P.F. 1967. Philosophical logic. Oxford University P.
[81]
Tarski, A. and Corcoran, J. 1983. Logic, semantics, metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938. Hackett Pub. Co.
[82]
Tarski, A. and Corcoran, J. 1983. Logic, semantics, metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938. Hackett Pub. Co.
[83]
Tarski, A. and Corcoran, J. 1983. Logic, semantics, metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938. Hackett Pub. Co.
[84]
Tarski, A. and Corcoran, J. 1983. Logic, semantics, metamathematics: papers from 1923 to 1938. Hackett Pub. Co.
[85]
Tarski, A. and Corcoran, J. 1986. What are logical notions? History and Philosophy of Logic. 7, 2 (1986), 143–154. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1080/01445348608837096.
[86]
William H. Hanson 1997. The Concept of Logical Consequence. The Philosophical Review. 106, 3 (1997), 365–409.
[87]
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. Routledge.
[88]
Williamson, T. 1994. Vagueness. Routledge.
